Catalytic Biomass Pyrolysis Studies at Pilot-Scale

Similar documents
Ofei D. Mante* and FA Agblevor Biological Engineering, Utah State University, Logan UT; *RTI International, Research Triangle, NC

Sustainable Biofuels A Small Step towards Carbon Management

Pyrolysis and Gasification

PYRENA PYRolysis Equipment for New Approaches to produce better bio-oil

Effect of Pressure and Heating Rates on Biomass Pyrolysis and Gasification

Conversion of Biomass Particles

Gasification Research at OSU

Design, Construction, and Commissioning of a Pilot-Scale Dual Fluidized Bed System for CO 2 Capture

Energy-Crop Gasification

PRODUCTION OF SYNGAS BY METHANE AND COAL CO-CONVERSION IN FLUIDIZED BED REACTOR

Mikko Hupa Åbo Akademi Turku, Finland

Pilot Scale Biorefinery for Sustainable Fuels from Biomass via Integrated Pyrolysis and Catalytic Hydroconversion

Problems Recorded on the Appropriateness of a Pilot Plant for Production of Second Generation Biofuels by Fast Pyrolysis

Characterization studies of Waste- bio-derived feedstocks

Conversion of Bio-oil to Hydrocarbons Via a Low Hydrogen Route Philip H. Steele and Sathish K. Tanneru

Novel Ni-based catalysts for the hydrotreatment of fast pyrolysis oil

Effect of Torrefaction on Biomass Chemistry and Hydrocarbons Production from Fast Pyrolysis

The biocrack Process a refinery integrated biomass-to-liquid concept

Utilization of Fractionated Bio-Oil in Asphalt. R. Christopher Williams Justinus Satrio Marjorie Rover Robert C. Brown Sheng Teng

Flash Pyrolysis of Jatropha Oil Cake in Gas Heated Fluidized Bed Research Reactor

Stability of fast pyrolysis bio-oils and upgraded products

A NOVEL APPROACH FOR THE INTEGRATION OF BIOMASS PYROLYTIC CONVERSION PROCESSES IN EXISTING MARKETS OF LIQUID FUELS AND CHEMICALS

Processing Recalcitrant Feedstocks in a Biorefinery

Biomass Pyrolysis. Tony Bridgwater Bioenergy Research Group Aston University, Birmingham B4 7ET, UK

Fast Pyrolysis Liquids to Biofuels: R&D at PNNL and IEA Bioenergy

Testing and Feasibility Study of an Indirectly Heated Fluidized-Bed Coal Gasifier

The potential and challenges of drop in biofuels

Commercial biochar production and its certification

EVALUATION OF AN INTEGRATED BIOMASS GASIFICATION/FUEL CELL POWER PLANT

Steam Gasification of Low Rank Fuel Biomass, Coal, and Sludge Mixture in A Small Scale Fluidized Bed

Thermal Conversion of Animal Manure to Biofuel. Outline. Biorefinery approaches

Development of a lab-scale auger reactor for biomass fast pyrolysis and process optimization using response surface methodology

Green Fuel Nordic The Smart Way. Utilising RTP TM technology to produce sustainable 2 nd generation bio-oil from local feedstocks

Utilization of Fractionated Bio-Oil in Asphalt. R. Christopher Williams Justinus Satrio Marjorie Rover Robert C. Brown Sheng Teng

HYBRID STAGED THERMOLYSIS TO VALORISE BIOMASS Paul de Wild, March 11, 2009

From lab to commercial success biomass-to-liquid innovations story with VTT

RTI Warm Syngas Cleanup Technology Demonstration

MULTI-WASTE TREATMENT AND VALORISATION BY THERMOCHEMICAL PROCESSES. Francisco Corona Encinas M Sc.

Synthetic fuels and chemical from biomass by the bioliq-process

Formation of Liquid and Solid Products of Liquid Phase Pyrolysis

Process Economics Program

ADVANCED ENERGY TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT AT RTI INTERNATIONAL

The Effects of Increased Pressure on the Reaction Kinetics of Biomass Pyrolysis and Combustion

EXPERIENCE WITH ATMOSPHERIC FLUIDIZED BED GASIFICATION OF SWITCHGRASS. Jerod Smeenk and Robert C. Brown

Design and Operation of Biomass Circulating Fluidized Bed Boiler with High Steam Parameter

Managing FCC Reliability and Run Lengths

Principles of Pyrolysis

Application of activated process char for gas treatment of biomass gasification producer gases

C R. ombustion esources, Inc. Evaluation of Stratean Inc. Gasifier System. 18 March Consultants in Fuels, Combustion, and the Environment

Sustained Hydrotreatment of Biomass Pyrolysis Bio oil with Minimal Catalyst Deactivation

Andre Bezanson Mech 4840

THE HOT GAS DESULFURIZATION IN A COMPACT TWO BEDS SYSTEM INTEGRATED WITH COAL GASIFICATION AND FISHER-TROPSCH SYSTEM

Pyrolysis for Biochar Production

Outline. Comparative Fast Pyrolysis of Agricultural Residues for Use in Biorefineries. ECI Bioenergy-II:

Application of CFB (Circulating Fluidized Bed) to Sewage Sludge Incinerator

The production of biochar and byproducts. Tony Bridgwater Bioenergy Research Group Aston University, Birmingham B4 7ET, UK

Synthetic Fuel Substitutes for Thermal Oxidizers Increased Sustainability, Reduced Natural Gas Consumption

The biocrack Process a refinery integrated biomass-to-liquid concept to produce diesel from biogenic feedstock

Technical Information Paper. (R)FCC Slurry Oil Filtration

CREATIVITY AND EXPERTISE to develop solutions for the marine industry. Green Tech 2016 Marine fuels from forest biomass

DEVELOPMENT OF A CIRCULATING FLUIDIZED BED REACTOR MODEL FOR THE FAST PYROLYSIS OF BIOMASS FOR PROCESS SIMULATION

Performance of CLOU process in the combustion of different types of coal with CO 2 capture

Options for Renewable Hydrogen Technologies

Development of Foster Wheeler s Vision 21 Partial Gasification Module

Gas Yields from Coal Devolatilization in a Bench-Scale Fluidized Bed Reactor

Plastic to Fuel Technologies

Opportunities for New Products Development in Green Chemistry. José Marcos Ferreira Tainá Dias Valente

Challenge 2: Fargione et al; Land Use Change Penalty. CO 2 debt is created when land is cleared

REMOVAL OF RESIDUAL CHAR FINES FROM PYROLYSIS VAPORS BY HOT GAS FILTRATION

We accept the challenge!

Process Optimization of Hydrogen Production from Coal Gasification

Investigators: R. E. Mitchell, Associate Professor, Mechanical Engineering Department; P. A. Campbell and L. Ma, Graduate Researchers

OPTIMISATION OF ANGLO PLATINUM S ACP ACID PLANT CATALYTIC CONVERTER. M. K. SICHONE Anglo Platinum, ACP, Kroondal, South Africa

Cleaning biomass generated syngas: is biochar a cheaper alternative to expensive catalysts? Ajay Kumar Oklahoma State University

Fuel Analysis and Burning Characteristics

Update on Biomass Gasification in New Zealand

Gasification of Australian and North Dakota Lignites in a Pressurised Fluidized Bed Gasification Process Development Unit

The hydrothermal decomposition of biomass and waste to produce bio-oil

Comparison of a New Warm-Gas Desulfurization Process versus Traditional Scrubbers for a Commercial IGCC Power Plant

Increased availability and optimization of calciner performance due to automation

OUTOTEC ROASTING SOLUTIONS

Status and Outlook for bioliq-project Syngas Platform for High Performance Fuels

Development status of the EAGLE Gasification Pilot Plant

Decentralized Biomass Power Production

Reprinted from November 2015 ENGINEERING HYDROCARBON

The Pyrolysis-Bioenergy-Biochar Pathway to Carbon Negative Energy

Report No. 29 ETHYLENE. August A private report by the PROCESS ECONOMICS PROGRAM I STANFORD RESEARCH INSTITUTE MENLO PARK, CALIFORNIA

Microalgae Biofuels and Carbon Cycling

WESTINGHOUSE PLASMA GASIFICATION

Catalytic Pyrolysis of Lignin for Bio oils

Effect of Flue Gas Recirculation on the Formation of Fine Particulate Matter in a Domestic Pellet-Fired Boiler

Algae Under Pressure and in Hot Water Hydrothermal Pathways to Renewable Fuels

Shoujie (Jay) Ren Forum Drive. Apt A, Rolla, MO Phone: (865) ;

DrM Korfu 2004 Glycol Filtration a new application in natural gas production plants

ATTRITION OF LIGNITE CHAR DURING FLUIDIZED BED GASIFICATION: EXPERIMENTAL AND MODELING STUDIES. Paola Ammendola and Fabrizio Scala

Design, Fabrication and Performance Study of a Biomass Solid Waste Pyrolysis System for Alternative Liquid Fuel Production

Future Opportunities for Biomass Fuels and Power

Biomass Conversion to Drop-in Fuels

INTEGRATED HEAT, ELECTRICITY AND BIO-OIL PRODUCTION. IEA Biomass Task 34 Meeting in Chicago Jani Lehto, Metso Pekka Jokela, UPM

TECHNO-ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT, THE FINNISH CASE STUDY

Transcription:

Catalytic Biomass Pyrolysis Studies at Pilot-Scale TCS2016, November 1-4, 2016, Chapel Hill, NC Ofei Mante, D. Dayton, D. Barbee, M. Carpenter, L. Shumaker, K. Wang, and J. Peters RTI International is a registered trademark and a trade name of Research Triangle Institute. www.rti.org

Catalytic Biomass Pyrolysis and Biocrude Upgrading at RTI Objective: Demonstrate an advanced biofuels technology that integrates a catalytic biomass pyrolysis step and a hydroprocessing step to produce infrastructure compatible biofuels. Technical goals are to: 1) optimize the catalytic biomass pyrolysis process (1 tonne/day) to achieve high degree of deoxygenation, while maximizing the bio-crude production 2) improve bio-crude thermal stability 3) evaluate the impact of bio-crude quality in the hydroprocessing step 4) minimize hydrogen demand of the integrated process 5) maximize biofuels yields. Feedstocks (INL, Local Sources) Loblolly Pine Hybrid Poplar Corn Stover Switchgrass Catalytic Biomass Pyrolysis Proof of Concept (1" dia fluidized bed) RTI (ARPA-E) Hydroprocessing Proof of Concept (1-L upgrading) P66 (ARPA-E) Advanced Biofuels Gasoline, Diesel, Jet Fuel Bench-scale (1 TPD) RTI (BETO) Bench-scale (350-mL integrated) Haldor Topsøe (BETO)

Catalytic Pyrolysis- Bench Scale Studies Organic Yield, wt% Catalyst RTI-A9 Alumina-1 Alumina-2 RTI-3 BZ-1 BO-1 Organic Yield, wt% 24.8 9.3 8.4 18 21.4 15.4 Oxygen Content, wt%(dry) 19.9 16.5 15.1 24.4 25.9 24.1 30 25 20 15 10 5 RTI-A9 Alumina-1 Alumina-2 RTI-3 BZ-1 BO-1 Increasing biocrude yield while decreasing oxygen content is a major challenge. 0 0 10 20 30 Oxygen Content,wt% (dry)

Pilot-Scale Studies: Methodology Objective: Demonstrate steady-state operation for at least 12 consecutive hours to evaluate process conditions on biocrude yield and quality. Feedstocks: Biomass Loblolly pine Particle Size 2 mm top size Moisture wt% Catalyst: Non-zeolite alumina based catalyst with nominal 70 µm particle size CFP Conditions: Biomass Feed Rate: 35-70 kg/h Pyrolysis Temperature: 425-600 ºC Regenerator Temperature : 560-640 ºC Mixing Zone N 2 flowrate : 75 550 scfh Mixing Zone Residence time : 0.5 2 s Elemental composition (as-received), wt.% Carbon Hydrogen Nitrogen Oxygen 15.0 47.4 6.5 46.2 Red Oak < 2mm 10.0 45.5 6.4 0.4 47.7

Pilot-Scale Studies: Process Flow Diagram Regenerator Cyclone Regenerator Off-gas Water Air Off-gas Cooler Filter Differential Pressure Control Valve Vent Reactor Cyclone Catalyst, Ash and Char Product Vapors Quench Water Riser Regenerator Make-up Catalyst Chilled Water Heavy Bio-crude Heat Exchanger Chilled Water Light Bio-crude Pressure Control Valve Thermal Oxidizer Mixing Zone Biomass Fluidizing Nitrogen Loop Seal Orifice Fuel Water Regenerator Air Gas/Liquid Separator Aqueous Product Storage

RTI s 1TPD Catalytic Biomass Pyrolysis Unit Reactor Front View Biomass Conveyer Screw Biomass Feeder Biomass Hopper Controls Cabinet

Pilot-Scale Studies: Methodology CFP Process: Start-up Procedure: Electric heating to 350 o C Increase gas flows to initiate solids circulation Diesel injection in regenerator to reach desired mixing zone temperature Discontinue diesel injection and commence biomass feeding Feed biomass continuously for 12 hours Stop biomass feeding and shutdown Analysis: CFP product gases and regenerator off gases are analyzed online by micro-gcs Liquids and solids are routinely sampled to determine mass and carbon balances. Characterization of liquid samples Moisture, Density, Viscosity CHNOS GC-MS 13 C-NMR

Pilot-Scale Studies: Methodology Run Code Biomass feed rate (kg/h) Mixing zone Temp. ( C) Riser Temp. ( C) Mixing zone N 2 flow rate (scfh) Mixing zone residence time (s) 13703-37 45.6 424.3 421.7 340 1.38 13703-50 35.5 527.6 520.4 290 1.41 13703-52 50.9 576.0 583.5 513 0.75 13703-56 54.6 464.6 491.1 445 1.00 13703-70 54.5 494.1 490.8 544 0.79 13703-78 44.1 432.6 424.7 546 0.85 13703-86 54.7 460.7 455.1 531 0.84 13703-96 35.8 519.7 494.3 495 0.84 13703-98 64.2 521.0 495.3 75 5.49 13703-102 66.7 514.2 493.7 468 0.89 13703-106 38.9 489.3 478.1 231 1.86

Pilot Plant Operation- Reactor Temperature Profile Temperature, C 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 Mixing Zone Temp Riser Temp Regen Temp 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 Time on stream (hours)

Pilot Plant Operation- Gas Flows Profile Gas Flow Rate (scfh) Hundreds 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 Reactor Inlet N2 Flow Pyrolysis Product Gas Flow Regen Air Inlet Flow Regen Exit Gas Flows 15 10 5 0 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 Time on Stream (hours)

Results- Yields Summary Yield, gal/dry ton of biomass Yield, gal/dry ton of biomass Oxygen Content, wt% Oxygen Content, wt% 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 425 o C 4 6 8 10 12 CFP Run Time, hours Steady-state yields of biocrude for CFP of loblolly pine using alumina catalyst at 465 o C was around 50 gal/ton. 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 60 50 40 30 20 10 465 o C Steady-state (6-10 h) yields of biocrude for CFP of loblolly pine using alumina catalyst at 425 o C was around 40-45 gal/ton. 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 5 7 9 11 13 CFP Run Time, hours 0

Results- Biocrude Composition Peak Area, % 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 425 C 465 C 485 C 520 C 575 C CFP Temperature, C Other Aliphatic Carbonyls, mono Carbonyls, multi Furans Acids Mono-Aromatic PAH Phenol, mono Phenol, multi Sugar

Results- Biocrude Physico-Chemical Properties CFP liquid products* Lightbiocrude Heavybiocrude Density, g/cm3 Kinematic viscosity, cst Carbon, wt% Hydrogen, wt% Nitrogen, wt% Oxygen, wt% 1.018 4.1 80.3 8.1 0.077 11.5 1.162 154 70.9 6.6 0.108 22.4 * From CFP of loblolly pine at 520 o C

Results-Carbon Balance Run Code -37-50 -52-56 -70-78 -86-96 -98-102 -106 Temperature ( C) 424 528 576 465 494 433 461 520 521 514 489 Bio-oil (Organic), % 10.3 10.4 7.4 17.9 14.1 17.4 6.7-5.8 7.2 13.9 Bio-oil (Aqueous), % 17.2 12.9 9.3 23.1 13.3 9.9 10.2 15.3 19.8 14.6 10.1 Total Liquid, % 27.5 23.3 16.7 41 27.4 27.3 16.9 15.3 25.6 21.8 24 Pyrolysis Gas, % Solid/Regen Gas, % 6.7 21.8 13.8 7.8 7.3 4.6 3.7 9.8 10.9 9.4 10.7 48.8 52.3 32.0 51.5 47.9 56.0 55.5 70.2 47.8 49.5 32.9 Carbon Balance 82.9 97.4 62.6 100.3 82.6 87.9 76.0 80.0 84.3 80.7 67.6

Results-Parametric Effects (Alumina, loblolly pine)

Results-Parametric Effects (Alumina, loblolly pine)

Results-Parametric Effects (Alumina, loblolly pine)

Results- Yields Summary Bio-crude (organic) Yield, wt% 40 Bench-scale published data RTI Pilot-Plant Data RTI Bench-Scale Data 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 15 20 25 30 35 Oxygen content (wt% of bo-crude)

Summary Loblolly Pine Sawdust Liquids Aqueous Organics Solids (Ash and Catalyst Fines) Catalytic biomass pyrolysis in a 1 -dia fluidized bed reactor 20 wt% oxygen content with 42% energy recovery 1 TPD unit operational for more than Three years 4 catalysts tested; 5 feedstocks loblolly pine, hybrid poplar, corn stover, hardwood pellets, red oak 12 h Parametric Studies Temperature was the most influential factor. Short residence times reduced biomass devolatilization. Moderate temperatures (450 T < 500) favored higher yields. Anhydrosugars are cracked at higher temperature > 500 o C, and formation of simple phenols, catechols, and PAH increases. Steady-state yield analysis varied between 38 and 50 gallons/dry ton of biomass. Extended Operations Completed 30 and 20 hours of steady-state operation. Over 200-gal of loblolly pine bio-crude produced for upgrading. Preliminary techno-economic analysis complete See other presentations by Dr. Sylvain Verdier in Session 2.2:Pyrolysis and Dr. Ofei Mante in Session 3.2: Upgrading

Acknowledgements Kim Knudsen Glen Hytoft Jostein Gabrielsen Sylvain Verdier Nadia Luciw Ammitzbøll David D. Dayton John Carpenter Kaige Wang Jonathan Peters David Barbee Kelly Amato Michael Carpenter