Sustainable Forest Management

Similar documents
2/24/2009. The factors that determine what type of forest will grow in a region are temperature precipitation growing season soil land forms

INFESTATION MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITIES

Invermere Timber Supply Area

Chapter 3 TIMBER SUPPLY ANALYSIS

ANC Timber Ltd 2016 Re-certification Audit

Defining Forests. forestry hardwood log native forest old-growth forest. E-unit: Defining Forests Page 1

Reforestation. After working through this lesson, you should be able to:

Boreal 101. Hook: Variety in the Boreal. Procedure. Learning Outcomes. Extensions

Supply Base Report. Pinnacle Renewable Energy Inc. - Williams Lake Division.

5 Ministry of FLNR Map Area

Soil Temperature Damping Depth in Boreal Plain Forest Stands and Clear Cuts: Comparison of Measured Depths versus Predicted based upon SWAT Algorithms

APPENDIX 2 -- EASTERN U.S. SITE-TREE SELECTION CRITERIA AND FIA FOREST TYPE ALGORITHM FOR THE U.S. EASTERN U.S. SITE-TREE SELECTION CRITERIA

An Example of Long-Form Audit Reporting

Big Hill Insect and Disease Project Proposed Action

LITTLE PRAIRIE COMMUNITY FOREST: B2B October 12, 2016 Presented by Jeff Beale, RPF

The Galton Project Kootenai National Forest. The Galton Project

Tolko Industries Ltd. Athabasca OSB Woodlands 2016 SFI Surveillance Audit

Tree Identification Topics: Original Bearing and Line Trees

Medicine Bow Landscape Vegetation Analysis (LaVA) Cooperating Agency Meeting March 6, :30 a.m. 12:30 p.m.

ISSUE: CANADIAN FOREST PRODUCTS: CONTRIBUTING TO CLIMATE CHANGE SOLUTIONS

Forest Resources of the Ashley National Forest

Overview of Forest Tenure

The Natural Capital Value of Forest Habitat Conservation

Lab 8. Photointerpretation of (Ontario Boreal) Tree Species

Forest Management Branch Directive

Mountain Pine Beetle Management in Canada s Mountain National Parks

Prince George Forest District

Forest Tenure. This lesson provides an overview of Alberta's Legislation and Policy that relates to Forest Tenure.

Aerial Survey Highlights for Colorado, 2016

Forestry in BC. What features of forests make them susceptible to overuse and degradation?

Factoring out of indirect and natural effects

SPECIES AND STAND DYNAMICS IN THE MIXED-WOODS OF QUEBEC'S BOREAL FOREST: A GUIDE FOR ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT

Finnish Forest Sector Economic Outlook

Millar Western Forest Products Ltd.

E8 Forest Management Plan

Forest Resources of the Fishlake National Forest

THE STATE OF CANADA S FORESTS ANNUAL REPORT 2011

APPENDIX A VEGETATION RESTORATION TREATMENT SUMMARY ABBREVIATIONS USED IN THE HARVEST TREATMENT SUMMARY TABLES

British Columbia. Ecosystem Restoration Program

(129) Permanent year-round access. A branch road serving as a collector or as a main winter haul road. Duration of use: 10 years+.

Fire and Biodiversity in British Columbia Ze ev Gedalof, Climate & Ecosystem Dynamics Research Lab, University of Guelph

CA Forest Pest Council Deterioration and Decay in Fire- and Insect-killed Trees

West Fraser Mills Ltd. B.C. and Alberta Woodlands 2016

CANADA. INFORMAL SUBMISSION TO THE AWG-KP Information and Data on Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF) September 2009

Capacity and Capability of Mills in the Flathead National Forest Timber-Processing Area

Appendix B: Site Index Curves for Selected Tree Species. Interpreting Site Index Curves

Policy and Genetic Resource Management Directions or Who moved my seed?

Northern deciduous forest as wildlife habitat. Tom Paragi Alaska Department of Fish and Game Fairbanks

Fire History in the Colorado Rockies

Supply Base Report for GLHU Stolbtsovski leshoz

Local Log Markets. Past, Present, Future Trends (from a log sellers perspective)

Presentation to the Yunnan Forestry Visiting Delegation to the Faculty of Forestry, UBC, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, April29th, 2005

Landscape-level biomass opportunities

Forest Resources of the Nez Perce National Forest

Supply Base Report: Shaw Resources Eastern Embers

B.C. FIRST NATIONS FORESTRY COUNCIL

Wildlife Conservation Strategy

Emerald Ash Borer: The Protection Option in Canada. J. Meating BioForest Technologies Inc. Sept. 28, 2011

Forest Storm Damage Factsheet. Washington State Department of Natural Resources August 2012

Forest and climate change

2012, Queen s Printer for Ontario Printed in Ontario, Canada ISBN (PDF)

NDS SUPPLEMENT NATIONAL DESIGN SPECIFICATION AMERICAN WOOD COUNCIL. Design Values for Wood Construction

Assessment. Forest Plan Revision

CLIMATE CHANGE INDUCED VEGETATION SHIFTS IN EUROPE

TEMPERATE FORESTS Ed Jensen, College of Forestry, OSU. Temperate Deciduous Forests

BLUNT FIRE INCREMENTAL SILVICULTURE PROJECT

Explanation of the Forest Planning and Practices Regulation Amendments to Protect Secondary Structure

2011 SUSTAINABLE FOREST MANAGEMENT STEWARDSHIP REPORT

Sustainable Forests, Sustainable Communities

KOOTENAY-BOUNDARY HIGHER LEVEL PLAN ORDER

Boulder Ranger District

BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA MERIT BADGE SERIES FORESTRY

THE STATE OF CANADA S FORESTS. Annual Report

Executive Summary. Regeneration and Stand Structure following Mountain Pine Beetle infestation in the sub-boreal spruce zone.

FOREST MANAGEMENT LICENCE NUMBER 2

Seed Zones in Alberta: Applications to shrubs used in reclamation

Forest Resources of the Black Hills National Forest

Atco Wood Products Ltd. SFI Surveillance / Certificate Upgrade Audit June 2016

Reforestation Standard of Alberta

Old Growth Policy for Ontario s Crown Forests

November 2011 SUPPLEMENT NDS. National Design Specification. Design Values for Wood Construction 2012 EDITION

U.S. Census Bureau Lumber Production and Mill Stocks MA321T(07) Issued May 2008

RURAL ECONOMY. Staff Paper

Evaluating the Ecological Impacts of Emerald Ash Borer (and Climate Change) in Black Ash Forests

Adaptation Options for Managing Ecosystems; Coping with Climate Change Forest Service Research and Development Support for Management of Wildlands

Capacity and Capability of Mills in the Clearwater and Nez Perce National Forests Timber Processing Area

Biomass availability and supply. Charles Friesen, Researcher, FPInnovations

Dawson Creek Timber Supply Area Old Growth Management Project.

First Nations Direct Award Forest Tenure Opportunities Guidelines

The Forest Management Plan For Crown License 7

Provincial Woodland Caribou Range Plan. DRAFT Provincial Woodland Caribou Range Plan

Provincial Strategic Threat Analysis 2015 Wildfire Threat Analysis Component. BC Wildfire Service

SMALL STEPS FORWARD Environmental Protection Report 2015/2016 VOLUME TWO: BIODIVERSITY

Summary of British Columbia Forest Inventory Statistics by Land Administration Class

Plantation Forestry: A Global Look

Burning BC s Forests

MANITOBA'S FOREST INDUSTRY, 1985

Type 1 Incremental Silviculture Strategy TFL Version

North Half. South Half

ACTUAL CHALLENGES IN FOREST MANAGAMENT

Transcription:

Sustainable Forest Management 2015 Facts & Statistics Spring 2017 ISBN 978-1-4601-3520-4 ISSN 2368-4844 Agriculture and Forestry Annual Allowable Cut Sustainable forest management requires long-term planning. The forest industry and the Alberta government look at the possible impacts of today s harvesting practices on the forest 200 years in the future. The Annual Allowable Cut (AAC) is the annual amount of timber that can be harvested on a sustainable basis within a defined forest area. The AAC is measured in cubic metres and is based on what the forest will grow. Forest managers use a variety of sample plots and statistical methods to predict the future growth. AACs are approved separately for coniferous (e.g. lodgepole pine or white spruce) and deciduous (e.g. trembling aspen) species groups (Figure 1). In Alberta, AACs are set for Forest Management Units in the Green Area. A Forest Management Unit (FMU) is an area of forested public land designated by the department, under the authority of the Forests Act, as an administrative unit to manage timber. The Alberta government has developed standards for determining the AAC. The approved AAC reflects the area available for harvest and the forest management strategies applied to that area. Forest management strategies also take into account other forest uses outside of timber harvesting. The approved AAC does vary over time. This can be a result of updates or changes to: forest inventory, and growth and yield information; the area available for timber harvest (i.e., changes and additions to provincial parks and other reserved areas); Forest Management Agreement (FMA) and FMU boundaries; calculation procedures and models; catastrophic events, such as wildfire, insects and diseases; management strategies. Individual yearly harvest levels may be greater than the AAC. However, the total harvest level over a five-year period will not exceed the total allowable cut for the five-year period. Figure 1. Examples of types of forests in Alberta Coniferous Forest Deciduous Forest 2017 Government of Alberta

Statistics As of April 30, 2015, the Green Area of Alberta had a total AAC of 32.4 million cubic metres. A total of 19.6 million cubic metres of this AAC was coniferous and 12.8 million cubic metres was deciduous. Figure 2 and Table 1 show the percentage of AAC by tree species group. Table 1 and Figure 3 show that the Upper Peace, Upper Athabasca, and Lower Peace regions contributed the majority (80.76%) of the total AAC in 2014/15. The Lower Athabasca, North Saskatchewan and South Saskatchewan regions contributed a combined total of 19.19 per cent of the AAC. The Red Deer Region contributed only a fraction of a percentage (0.05%), as it is mainly comprised of non-forested private land. Figure 2. Annual Allowable Cut (%) in Alberta s Green Area by tree species group, 2014/15 Coniferous 60.45% e.g., lodgepole pine Deciduous 39.55% e.g., trembling aspen Table 1. Annual Allowable Cut in Alberta s Green Area by Land-use Framework Planning Region, 2014/15 Land-use Framework Planning Region Coniferous Annual Allowable Cut (m 3 /yr) 1 Deciduous Annual Allowable Cut (m 3 /yr) 2 Total Annual Allowable Cut (m 3 /yr) Lower Athabasca 1,210,188 1,661,363 2,871,551 Lower Peace 4,222,735 4,862,960 9,085,695 North Saskatchewan 2,291,342 479,754 2,771,096 Red Deer 14,181 1,656 15,837 South Saskatchewan 518,590 52,494 571,084 Upper Athabasca 5,509,187 2,536,928 8,046,115 Upper Peace 5,809,501 3,211,843 9,020,344 Provincial Total 19,574,724 12,806,998 32,381,722 1 Depending on the area, this may include Douglas fir, subalpine fir, balsam fir, alpine larch, tamarack larch, western larch, Jack pine, lodgepole pine, black spruce, Englemann spruce and/or white spruce. Limber pine and whitebark pine are Endangered Species under the Alberta Wildlife Act and do not contribute to Annual Allowable Cuts in Alberta. 2 Depending on the area, this may include balsam (black) poplar, trembling aspen and/or white birch. Page 2

Statistics cont d Figure 3. Total Annual Allowable Cut (%) in Alberta s Green Area by Land-use Framework Planning Region, 2014/15 North Saskatchewan 8.56% Upper Peace 28.96% 1 Lower Peace 28.06% South Saskatchewan 1.76% Lower Athabasca 8.87% Red Deer 0.05% Upper Athabasca 24.85% 1 Rounded to add up to 100%. Table 1, and Figures 4 and 5 show the AAC in 2014/15 separated by coniferous and deciduous species groups. The Upper Athabasca and Upper Peace regions contributed the majority (57.81 per cent) of the coniferous AAC. The Lower Peace, North Saskatchewan and Lower Athabasca regions contributed a combined total of 39.46 per cent. In contrast, the South Saskatchewan and Red Deer regions contributed a combined total of only 2.72 per cent of the coniferous AAC. The Lower Athabasca Region had 12.97 per cent of the deciduous AAC. The AAC contributions decreased further south in the province with the North Saskatchewan, Red Deer and South Saskatchewan regions contributing 4.17 per cent of the deciduous AAC. Table 2 shows the AAC for each Forest Management Unit within the Green Area of the Province in 2014/15. The Lower Peace, Upper Peace and Upper Athabasca regions contributed the majority (82.86 per cent) of the deciduous AAC, with the Lower Peace contributing a significant portion (37.97 per cent) of the total. Page 3

Statistics cont d Figure 4. Coniferous Annual Allowable Cut (%) in Alberta s Green Area by Land-use Framework Planning Region, 2014/15 North Saskatchewan 11.71% Upper Peace 29.67% South Saskatchewan 2.78% Lower Peace 21.57% Lower Athabasca 6.18% Red Deer 0.07% Upper Athabasca 1 29.89% Figure 5. Deciduous Annual Allowable Cut (%) in Alberta s Green Area by Land-use Framework Planning Region, 2014/15 Lower Peace 1 35.64% North Saskatchewan 3.75% Upper Peace 25.08% South Saskatchewan 0.41% Upper Athabasca 19.81% Lower Athabasca 12.97% Red Deer 0.01% 1 Rounded to add up to 100%. Page 4

Table 2. Annual Allowable Cut by Forest Management Unit in Alberta, 2014/15 Forest Management Unit(s) Coniferous Annual Deciduous Annual A09 23,298 18,670 41,968 A10 8,442 0 8,442 A14 213,574 164,587 378,161 A15 526,744 721,346 1,248,090 B09 173,056 53,677 226,733 B10 144,944 0 144,944 C04 1,536 0 1,536 C05 197,226 0 197,226 E02 97,268 90,572 187,840 E08 452,716 13,621 466,337 E09 1,600 2,100 3,700 E14 1,766,576 249,832 2,016,408 E15 142,037 40,178 182,215 F11 43,281 137,660 180,941 F14 78,856 77,771 156,627 F20 0 1,500 1,500 F23 270,798 304,251 575,049 F26 1,450,000 1,000,000 2,450,000 G09 11,600 11,000 22,600 G11 9,000 9,000 18,000 G12 6,569 33,000 39,569 G13 1,795 18,257 20,052 G14 15,897 21,000 36,897 G15 715,000 452,529 1,167,529 G16 2,278,112 1,478,041 3,756,153 L01 85,910 177,113 263,023 L02 114,634 144,528 259,162 L03 171,912 98,099 270,011 L08 39,528 65,751 105,279 L11 184,632 345,274 529,906 P08 0 73,400 73,400 P14 74,191 98,327 172,518 P19 736,300 679,100 1,415,400 P20 591,700 325,500 917,200 P21 664,300 1,004,300 1,668,600 PO1 3,723 5,183 8,906 PO2 20,491 32,954 53,445 PO3 1,712 7,777 9,489 R10 1,410,825 157,505 1,568,330 R12 954,301 278,372 1,232,673 R13 841,666 60,041 901,707 R14 9,122 8,170 17,292 S10 109,752 180,260 290,012 S11 123,926 175,687 299,613 S14 113,124 152,398 265,522 S16 8,018 13,330 21,348 S17 446,334 765,576 1,211,910 S18 215,199 279,997 495,196 S19 63,400 453,371 516,771 S20 802,255 538,896 1,341,151 S21 216,500 281,000 497,500 S22 177,052 375,585 552,637 S23 44,679 102,740 147,419 S24 6,581 3,915 10,496 W05 30,169 46,386 76,555 W06 245,382 151,528 396,910 W11 94,903 106,049 200,952 W13 435,844 209,412 645,256 W14 808,234 389,682 1,197,916 W15 1,098,500 121,200 1,219,700 Total Annual Provincial Total 19,574,724 12,806,998 32,381,722 Page 5

Figure 6. Alberta s Forest Management Units and Forest Management Agreement holders as of April 30, 2015 Page 6

Historical Trends Table 3 and Figure 6 show the AAC in Alberta s Green Area from the 2005/06 fiscal (April 1 to March 31) year to the 2014/15 fiscal year. The AAC was increased from 2005/06 to 2011/12. This was a result of new management strategies, especially in regards to mountain pine beetle (MPB). Alberta is experiencing an unprecedented expansion of MPB populations forests along the eastern slopes of the Rocky Mountains and further east in the boreal forest. Alberta is implementing a strategy to reduce the area of pine trees at greatest risk of insect infestation and catastrophic wildfires. Removing the most susceptible stands will help slow the spread of beetles and reduce the impact on Alberta s forest. The 2012/13 AAC was decreased to account for estimated reductions due to wildfire impacts and Lower Athabasca Regional Plan land withdrawals. Table 3. Annual Allowable Cut in Alberta s Green Area, 2005-2015 Year (April 1-March 31) Coniferous Annual Deciduous Annual 2005/2006 15,051,721 11,172,066 26,223,787 2006/2007 15,976,797 11,213,099 27,189,896 2007/2008 16,976,217 11,426,427 28,402,644 2008/2009 18,352,167 11,323,780 29,675,947 2009/2010 18,614,646 11,766,048 30,380,694 2010/2011 18,689,685 12,031,775 30,721,460 2011/2012 18,831,536 12,223,868 31,055,404 2012/2013 18,521,015 11,785,819 30,306,834 2013/2014 19,051,547 12,104,704 31,156,251 2014/2015 19,574,724 12,806,998 32,381,722 Figure 7. Annual Allowable Cut in Alberta s Green Area, 2005-2015 35 30 Total Annual Million Cubic Metres 25 20 15 10 5 Coniferous Deciduous Total 0 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 Year (April 1-March 31) 2012/13 2013/2014 2014/2015 Page 7

Historical Trends cont d The approval of several Forest Management Plans resulted in an increase in the 2013/14 and 2014/15 AACs. All Alberta forest tenures, including FMAs, Timber Quotas and Timber Permits with a term of more than one year are balanced over five-year periods. Fluctuations in total timber volume harvested from year to year reflect trends in the lumber, panelboard, and pulp and paper markets. Figure 7 shows that while the total timber harvest in Alberta gradually increased from 2001 to 2009, it remained below the total AAC. Comparing the five-year average timber volume harvested with the five-year average amount of timber allowed to be cut provides an indication of the status of Alberta s timber supply. To ensure sustainability, harvest levels should not exceed average allowable cut. The harvested timber volumes in Table 4, and Figures 7, 8 and 9 only include allocated timber on Alberta public land. Timber volumes from some industrial salvage, private and federal lands, and other volume from undersized or burned timber are excluded from the reported harvested volume. In Figures 8 and 9, a comparison between the AAC and the actual timber volume harvested as a fiveyear rolling average for the two tree species groups is shown. Figure 8 shows that the gap between the fiveyear rolling average of coniferous AAC and of coniferous timber volume harvested has closed over the 2001-2005, 2002-2006 and 2003-2007 reporting periods. This shows that the coniferous AAC was fully utilized during these periods. The gap between the five-year rolling average of the coniferous AAC and the coniferous timber volume harvested has increased over the next four reporting periods. This is due to the approval of increased coniferous AACs to deal with the MPB threat. The coniferous harvest level did not shown a corresponding increase because of recent market conditions. A large difference remains between the five-year rolling average of deciduous AAC and of deciduous timber volume harvested, as shown in Figure 9. Table 4. Annual Allowable Cut compared to the timber volume harvested in Alberta s Green Area as a five-year rolling average (million cubic metres), 2001-2014 1 5-yr Range Coniferous Deciduous Total April 1 to March 31 AAC Harvested % Harvested AAC Harvested % Harvested AAC Harvested % Harvested 2001-2005 13.95 13.58 97.39% 10.25 6.41 62.55% 24.20 20.00 82.63% 2002-2006 14.23 14.01 98.45% 10.40 6.47 62.18% 24.63 20.47 83.13% 2003-2007 14.68 14.49 98.69% 10.62 6.76 63.70% 25.30 21.25 84.01% 2004-2008 15.32 14.61 95.36% 10.89 6.74 61.94% 26.21 21.35 81.48% 2005-2009 16.10 14.44 89.70% 11.08 6.63 59.88% 27.18 21.08 77.56% 2006-2010 16.99 14.27 83.99% 11.38 6.52 57.29% 28.37 20.79 73.28% 2007-2011 17.72 14.14 79.80% 11.55 6.22 53.85% 29.27 20.36 69.56% 2008-2012 18.29 13.89 75.94% 11.75 5.89 50.13% 30.04 19.78 65.85% 2009-2013 18.60 14.26 76.67% 11.83 5.94 50.21% 30.43 20.20 66.38% 2010-2014 18.74 14.53 77.51% 11.95 6.24 52.11% 30.72 20.77 67.61% 1 Excludes some industrial salvage, private and federal lands, and other volume from undersized or burned timber. Page 8

Historical Trends cont d Figure 8. Total Annual Allowable Cut compared to the total timber volume harvested in Alberta s Green Area as a five-year rolling average, 2000-2014 35 Million Cubic Metres 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 2000-2004 2001-2005 Million Cubic Metres Million Cubic Metres 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 2000-2004 2001-2005 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 2002-2006 2003-2007 2004-2008 2000-2004 2001-2005 2002-2006 2003-2007 2004-2008 2005-2009 2002-2006 2003-2007 2004-2008 2005-2009 2006-2010 Five Year Range 2006-2010 2005-2009 2006-2010 2007-2011 2008-2012 2009-2013 2010-2014 Five Year Range Figure 10. Deciduous Annual Allowable Cut and timber volume harvested in Alberta s Green Area as a five-year rolling average, 2000-2014 Five Year Range 2007-2011 2008-2012 2009-2013 2010-2014 2007-2011 2008-2012 2009-2013 2010-2014 Total harvest Total AAC Figure 9. Coniferous Annual Allowable Cut and timber volume harvested in Alberta s Green Area as a five-year rolling average, 2000-2014 Coniferous harvest Coniferous AAC Deciduous harvest Deciduous AAC Page 9

Future Outlook The total AAC will remain higher than in the past as companies in mountain pine beetleaffected areas implement harvest strategies to address the situation. The corresponding actual harvest completed should increase as well during this period. AACs will also change over time as new Forest Management Plans are approved. The five-year rolling average coniferous level shown in Figure 8 will remain at or below the five -year rolling average coniferous AAC and may vary over time depending on market conditions. The difference between the five-year rolling average deciduous harvest level and the fiveyear rolling average deciduous AAC may vary over time depending on market conditions. Page 10