Latest Developments to Examine the Use of CO 2 and Ethane for EOR in the Bakken and Williston Basin Conventional Reservoirs

Similar documents
Latest Developments at the EERC and CO 2 Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) in Bakken Shale

Bakken Pad Drilling Greater Resource Potential with a Reduced Environmental Footprint

JUNE 14-16, 2016 SHERATON TYSONS CORNER TYSONS, VA. #CCUS

UPDATES AND DEVELOPMENTS AT THE EERC WILLISTON BASIN PERSPECTIVE

Lessons Learned from Enhanced Oil Recovery Operations: The Plains CO 2 Reduction Partnership

ILLINOIS INDUSTRIAL CARBON CAPTURE AND STORAGE PROJECT

Effects of Enhanced Oil Recovery on Production Engineers, Elm Coulee Field, Bakken Reservoir, Richland County, Montana

World Class CO 2 Sequestration Potential in Saline Formations, Oil and Gas Fields, Coal and Shale:

UIC Class VI Permitting Experience

WRITECoal Gasification of Low- Rank Coals for Improved Advanced Clean Coal Gasifier / IGCC Design

The Home Depot - Financing a Renewable & Alternative Energy Commitment

CO 2 Capture from Steam Methane Reformers: Commercial Scale Demonstration Project

Oil Production from Tight Shale Using CO 2

PRODUCTION WELL WATER SHUT-OFF TREATMENT IN A HIGHLY FRACTURED SANDSTONE RESERVOIR

Task Enhanced Mobility of Dense Nonaqueous-Phase Liquids (DNAPLs) Using Dissolved Humic Acids

Hub and Spoke Recycling

EOR Field Experiences in Carbonate Reservoirs in the United States

Managing the Distributed Solar Fleet: From Interconnection to Fleet Operations

SMU Geothermal Conference March 13, 2013

Energy Conservation vs. Energy Efficiency

Successful Completion Optimization of the Eagle Ford Shale

A Novel Integrated Oxy- Combustion and Flue Gas Purification Technology: A Near Zero Emissions Pathway

GASOLINE FROM NATURAL GAS BY SULFUR PROCESSING

Terrestrial Carbon Sequestration in the Northeast: Quantities and Costs

Business Impact of Using the Remote Disconnect Switch October, 2013

The Growing CO 2 -EOR Oil Recovery and CO 2 Utilization Prize

A Southern States Energy Board Carbon Management Program

Industrial Commission Update. Justin J Kringstad Geological Engineer Director North Dakota Pipeline Authority

Manual of Petroleum Measurement Standards Chapter 11 Physical Properties Data

Carbon Dioxide Enhanced Oil Recovery

Carbon Dioxide White Paper Prepared for the Wyoming Joint Minerals, Business and Economic Development Interim Committee October 4, 2006

STP-PT-026 GUARANTEED HIGHER STRENGTH PROPERTIES

This presentation is based upon work supported by the Department of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory under DE FC26 05NT42590 and was

Maximising oil recovery with stored CO 2 : A win-win for the North Sea

GreatPoint Energy International Advanced Coal Technologies Conference June 2010

ENERGYPLUS TRAINING MODULES FOR BUILDING PHYSICS: DAYLIGHTING, INFILTRATION, INSULATION, INTERNAL GAINS, AND THERMAL MASS

For personal use only Operations Update

SPE Copyright 2012, Society of Petroleum Engineers

Advanced Electric Submersible Pump Design Tool for Geothermal Applications

September 24, 2012 Oklahoma City, OK

Central Appalachian Basin (SECARB)

Carbon Capture & Sequestration in the California Context

Assessing the Potential for CO 2 Enhanced Oil Recovery and Storage in Depleted Oil Pools in Southeastern Saskatchewan

Re: Keystone XL Pipeline Project; EPA Comment Letter on Final Supplemental EIS

Global CO 2 Geological Storage Capacity in Hydrocarbon Fields

ST98: 2018 ALBERTA S ENERGY RESERVES & SUPPLY/DEMAND OUTLOOK. Executive Summary.

Subject Matter Expert: Author: Reviewed by: Margaret Goodrich Bill Schleicher Tim Simmons / Margaret Goodrich. Bulk Meter Readings

MILESTONE REPORT. Energy & Environmental Research Center, University of North Dakota 15 North 23rd Street, Stop 9018 Grand Forks, ND

NRG Carbon 360 SM Overview. John Ragan President NRG Carbon 360

My Electric Footprint

8 th Annual Wyoming CO 2 Conference

North America Midstream Infrastructure through 2035: Capitalizing on Our Energy Abundance

FAX: Title of Presentation: Criticality Measurements for SNM Accountability

Groundwater Monitoring Under a UIC Class VI Permit for a Carbon Storage Project

What Nuclear Reactor Companies Need

CO 2 SELECTIVE CERAMIC MEMBRANE FOR WATER-GAS-SHIFT REACTION WITH CONCOMITANT RECOVERY OF CO 2

GE Global Research Rahul Bidkar Doug Hofer Andrew Mann Max Peter Rajkeshar Singh Edip Sevincer Azam Thatte

Development of A Comprehensive Software Suite for Stability Monitoring and Analysis Based on Synchrophasor Measurement (DOE-OE )

Program Features: Pennsylvania s Low-Income Usage Reduction Program (LIURP)

Reading Your Electric Meter

Dan Kelly. June 14, 2013

PROPERTIES FOR COMPOSITE MATERIALS IN HYDROGEN SERVICE

DESIGN FACTOR GUIDELINES FOR HIGH PRESSURE COMPOSITE HYDROGEN TANKS STP/PT-005

Vapor Recovery Units: Agenda

4lliedSig nal - AEROSPACE. An Integrated, Subsurface Characterization System for Real-Time, In-Situ Field Analysis

Lignite Energy Council R&D Update. Mike Holmes VP for R&D Lignite Energy Council

Simulation-Based Optimization Framework with Heat Integration

Advisory G R A N I T E O I L C O R P. T S X : G X O

Role of Rock/Fluid Characteristics in Carbon (CO 2 ) Storage and Modeling

North Dakota Pipeline Authority Williston Basin Petroleum Conference May 23, 2012 Bismarck, ND

OCCIDENTAL PETROLEUM OVERVIEW. TIPRO Annual Summer Conference Jody Elliott August 18, 2016

Overview Gas & NGL Processing

Hydraulic Fracturing Test Site (HFTS)

Gaps and Challenges for Light and Tight EOR

SACROC CO 2 Flood Project Challenges: Past, Present, and Future

Managing Large Scale CCS: A Supplier Industry s Perspective

CO 2 EOR Research in Saudi Aramco. Nabeel Al-Afaleg, PhD Saudi Aramco 3 rd CSLF Workshop January 27 29, 2008 Al-Khobar, Saudi Arabia

Iowa Department of Natural Resources

Diesel and Gasoline: Energy Heavyweights

October 3 1, Heechan Cho R.P. Killmeyer

STP-NU-035 EXTEND ALLOWABLE STRESS VALUES FOR ALLOY 800H

Finding Global End Use Markets for the Growing LPG Supply

MONTHLY TECHNICAL PROGRESS REPORT. Product Design Improvement

Ion Transport Membrane (ITM) Technology for Lower-Cost Oxygen Production

ENERGY SLIDESHOW. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas

Hydraulic Fracturing Test Site (HFTS)

LSU Natural Gas Conference

ENERGY TRANSFER PARTNERS, L.P. Bakken Pipeline System Overview & Quality Update February 22, 2018

TCLP Preparation and Analysis of K East Basin Composite Sludge Samples

Production: Industry view. World Oil Reserves and. World Oil Reserves and. Kuwait Energy Company. Ray Leonard. ASPO 2007 Cork Ireland

Historic IOR/EOR practices in the Minnelusa

ReservoirSimulationModelsImpactonProductionForecastsandPerformanceofShaleVolatileOilReservoirs

Steady Wins TORTOISE TALK

PURE AND IMPURE CO 2 MINIMUM MISCIBILITY PRESSURE: COMPARING SIXTEEN CORRELATIONS

Technical Progress Report Rate Inhibition of Steam Gasification by Adsorbed Hydrogen #DE-FG22-93PC Reporting Period 7/1/

Trends, Issues and Market Changes for Crude Oil and Natural Gas

U.S. Crude Oil and Natural Gas Proved Reserves, 2012

Bitumen Upgrader Residue Conversion to Incremental Synthetic Fuels Products

Goldman Sachs Basic Materials Conference

US-DOE Patent Clearance is not required prior to the publication of this document.

Transcription:

Latest Developments to Examine the Use of CO 2 and Ethane for EOR in the Bakken and Williston Basin Conventional Reservoirs 13th Annual (2015) EOR Carbon Management Workshop Midland, Texas December 8, 2015 John Harju Vice President for Strategic Partnerships 2015 University of North Dakota Energy & Environmental Research Center.

Energy & Environmental Research Center (EERC) More than 254,000 square feet of state-of-the-art laboratory, demonstration, and office space.

Partners in EERC s Bakken Research Efforts

The more we understand about the Bakken petroleum system, the more oil we recognize in it. Currently, only a 3% 5% recovery factor. Small improvements in recovery yield billions of barrels of oil. How Do We Get More Oil Out of the Bakken? Can CO 2, or other gases, be a game changer in the Bakken? As a Commodity to Enhance Oil Recovery

CO 2 Oil Recovery From Upper, Middle, and Lower Bakken Rock Samples Small-scale lab experiments indicated CO 2 can remove oil from Middle Bakken rock and Bakken Shales in the lab. Since 2013 EERC has obtained similar results for samples from several Bakken wells in Dunn, McKenzie, and Mountrail Counties.

Bakken CO 2 Demand & EOR Potential for North Dakota A 30,000-ft View Based on the following: Traditional evaluation techniques NDIC OOIP estimates 4% incremental recovery Net utilization of 5000 and 8000 ft 3 /bbl 2 3.2 Bt of CO 2 needed. Yielding 4 7 Bbbl of oil. North Dakota currently produces ~33 Mtpy of CO 2. Leading us to ask, is there something other than CO 2 that might work for EOR?

% of total HC How Do Other Fluids Compare to CO 2 for Getting Oil Out of the Bakken? HC Removal from Middle Bakken Rock Samples Using Different Gases 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% Ethane CO2 CH4/Ethane, 85/15 CH4 20% 10% 0% 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Exposure time, hours

Ethane is Very Effective at Achieving Lower MMPs, Methane is Not! API 41.5 Crude (Bakken), 110 C

Pressure, psi Ethane is Very Effective at Achieving Lower MMPs, Methane is Not! API 30.7 Crude, 42 C 6000 5000 methane 5077±192 4000 3000 2000 1000 CO2 1468±42 ethane 736±8 0

CO 2 vs. Ethane for a 150 tons/d Pilot Scale EOR (Preliminary Estimates based on Early Lab Observations)

North Dakota Gas Plant Capacity - Total gas processing capacity in ND 1400 MMcfd. - Total ethane entering ND gas plants 240 MMcfd (170,000 bbl/d). - Current ND ethane production (fractionation) 43,000 bbl/d, most going to Alberta via Vantage pipeline. - Remaining ethane is present in pipeline gas or NGL product. - Over 90% of ethane processing capacity comes from 3 plants. Assumptions: 1. Raw gas into plant is 20% ethane. 2. bbl/d based on 2015 3 rd quarter processing as reported by ND DMR.

North Dakota EOR Opportunities Top 10 ranked conventional units combine for between 82 and 186 MMbbl of potential incremental oil. Gray shade is the areal extent of the Bakken Formation Top 10 ranked conventional units would require between 14 and 83 MMtons of CO 2. Total combined Williston Basin conventional EOR potential is between 280 and 630 MMbbl, requiring between 47 and 283 MMtons of CO 2. Conventionals combined with Bakken: 4-7.6 Bbbl of incremental oil 2-3.8 Btons of CO 2 needed

Short-Term Goal of the Overarching Program: Injection Test in the Field EERC activities will include: Conducting minimum miscibility pressure (MMP) and hydrocarbon extraction studies on site-specific samples. Providing site-specific modeling support. Working with the hosting operator to design and implement an effective monitoring scheme to determine the fate of the injected CO 2 and/or ethane and its impact on the reservoir. Site host will obtain the injection fluid, conduct the injection and production activities, and provide relevant data to the project team.

Long Term Goal New Initiative Project Ethane Drivers: To use regionally low value ethane to produce high value oil. Ethane is currently more available than CO 2 in the Williston Basin. Additional benefits Relieve gathering bottleneck/reduce flaring Improve pipeline quality methane Improve quality of NGLs (volatility) Eventually may be other markets for chemical and industrial applications - Production of power, fertilizer, methanol, other chemicals, etc. Challenges Fractionation investment Compression & storage infrastructure

Thank You! Andrew Burton/Getty Images

Contact Information Energy & Environmental Research Center University of North Dakota 15 North 23rd Street, Stop 9018 Grand Forks, ND 58202-9018 World Wide Web: www.undeerc.org Telephone No. (701) 777-5157 Fax No. (701) 777-5181 John Harju, Vice President for Strategic Partnerships jharju@undeerc.org

Acknowledgment This material is based upon work supported by the U.S. Department of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory under Award No. DE-FC26-08NT43291. Disclaimer This presentation was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government, nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof.