* Initiatives started in FY10 and carried forward into this Operational Plan are designated with a (*) in the subsequent pages.

Similar documents
a message from... AIR-6.0

Task Force Innovation Working Groups

Document Revision History

HQMC Strategic Workforce Planning Handbook

SPAWAR Paperless Initiatives Partnering for Success

Statement A: Approved for public release, distribution is unlimited (5 MAY 2015)

DoD Hazmat Business Process Reengineering: Environment, Safety and Occupational Health (ESOH) Transformation

National Defense University. Strategic Plan 2012/2013 to 2017/18 One University Evolution

2013 Program Excellence Award

Building an Integrated Talent Management Strategy. Stavros Liakakos, VP HCM Strategy Knowledge Infusion

IBM SmartCloud Solutions

Achieving Results Through Genuine Leadership

SUBJECT: Better Buying Power 2.0: Continuing the Pursuit for Greater Efficiency and Productivity in Defense Spending

Incorporating updates from the March 2016 Senior Leadership Team Offsite. Contents

Continuous Process Improvement Organizational Implementation Planning Framework

DoD Business Transformation and Environmental Liabilities Recognition, Valuation and Reporting

Application of the Integrated Product Support Elements

Contents. DCMA Strategic Plan

The U.S. Navy s Aviation Data Management System

Performance Based Life Cycle Product Support

DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY STRATEGIC PLAN FY

DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY AMERICA S COMBAT LOGISTICS SUPPORT AGENCY

Department of the Navy Earned Value Management Quarterly Newsletter. Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Management and Budget) (DASN (M&B))

DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY

Department of the Navy. Office of Small Business Programs. Speaker: Ms. Emily Harman Director, Department of the Navy

DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY

OPERATIONS. Copyright 2015 by EdFuel. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Lean Enterprise Transformation. FCM - UNICAMP Richard B. Lewis II Executive Director, Lean Advancement Initiative, MIT March 29, 2012

Talent Community of Expertise

Achieving Results Through

The Life Cycle Logistics career field comprises professionals

Office Of Small Business Programs

Improving Weapon System Investment Decisions A Knowledge-based Approach to Weapon System Acquisitions Could Improve Outcomes

Information and Communication Technologies Strategic Plan 2016/ /20

Modernization and Migration Management (M3) Playbook GSA, Unified Shared Services Management

Supply Management Three-Year Strategic Plan

SEC ESTABLISHMENT OF PANEL ON CONTRACTING INTEGRITY.

It has been proven time and again that the

CAPABILITY MATRIX FOR PROFESSIONAL STAFF HANDBOOK

National Defense University

A Navy Energy Vision for the 21 st Century. RADM Philip H. Cullom Director, Energy and Environmental Readiness Division OPNAV N45

THE UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

Air Vehicle Engineering: Direct Digital Manufacturing

DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY STRATEGIC PLAN Defense Logistics Agency Strategic Plan

Web-based Training for Naval Acquisition Development Program (NADP) Employee Supervisors and Career Field Managers

VISION, MISSION, VALUES

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

Kronos Workforce Ready Implementation Methodology and Customer Responsibilities for WFR Time Keeping Implementations

SERVICE STRENGTH AROUND THE GLOBE

Information Exchange Energy Security Topics

SECTION 2 HUMAN RESOURCE STRATEGY 2.01 CORPORATE HR PLANNING

DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY AMERICA S COMBAT LOGISTICS SUPPORT AGENCY

2017 AIR FORCE MATERIEL COMMAND STRATEGIC PLAN

One-Stop Center Certification in Illinois under WIOA Background and Policy Considerations

21st Century Organic Industrial Enterprise

PROCESS LED TRANSFORMATION & SUSTAINABILITY

ETA Sector Strategies Technical Assistance Initiative: SUSTAINING STATE SECTOR STRATEGIES

Gulfstream SMS. Safety Management International Collaboration Group Meeting Seattle - October 25, Fred Etheridge / Rick Trusis / Carmen Schooley

DoD Sustainability Strategy The Latest. Mr. Dave Asiello DUSD(I&E)/CMRM

Headquarters Marine Corps. Individual Development Plan Handbook

OSD SUPPLY CHAIN ENTERPRISE METRICS STRATEGY. Evolving DoD Supply Enterprise Metrics The Maintenance Customer Perspective

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES. KEY PRIORITIES for CSU Information Technology In support of Graduation Initiative 2025

The leading parts and logistics management system.

Office of the Director of National Intelligence. IC Annual Employee Climate Survey. April Summary Results

DIGITAL STRATEGY SUMMARY

HIMARS/M270A1 Life Cycle Launcher Support (LCLS) Marian Metivier After Market Enterprise Program Manager

Office of Management and Budget. Human Resource Management

Succession Planning. September 15 th, Khris Dodson Syracuse University EFC.

IBM Impact Grants. Offering Portfolio

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES (SOP) FOR THE REGIONAL OFFICE (RO) TRAINING MANAGER. Volume 1. Professional Development for Training Managers

LEADERSHIP PERFORMANCE CRITERIA

Pillar 4: Workforce Goal: To increase alignment of workforce supply with employer demand Supply & Demand

Logistics Community of Interest 1670 Equipment Services Series Competency-Based Learning Map and Training Strategy

Establishing a Sustainable Succession Planning Program

May 1, 2014 Page 1 of 6

Competing through People: Building a Strategy-Capable Organization

Inside of a ring or out, ain t nothing wrong with going down. It s staying down that s wrong. Muhammad Ali

SYSTEMS INTEGRATION / REPAIR AND OVERHAUL

HOW TO LAUNCH A SUCCESSFUL WORKFORCE PLANNING CENTER OF EXPERTISE (COE)

Required Navigation Performance Area Navigation (RNP RNAV) Flight Management File (FMF) Application Development

GW Human Resources Strategic Plan

COMMUNICATIONS STRATEGY

An Overview of the AWS Cloud Adoption Framework

STRATEGIC PLANNING IN THE DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY (DLA)

Cost-Effective Readiness

Report of the Reliability Improvement Working Group Table of Contents

FINANCE & BUSINESS AT PENN STATE...

Ready Relevant Learning Vision and Roadmap

Achieve Business Results with Performance - Based Learning Best Business Practices and Call Center Case Study

Assessment Tools in the Workplace

OBSI Strategic Plan

Organization Name: Rockwell Collins Program Name: KC-46 Tanker. Sub-System R&D/SDD program or project

NDIA Life Cycle Affordability Project

Chris Horton, Ph.D., CIA, CGAP County Auditor. Arlington County Auditor DRAFT Annual Audit Work Plan FY 2019

Selection and Reassignment Policy for International Rotational Posts Effective 1 October 2010

Firms around the world are developing and adapting

Arizona DCYF Final Project Report Executive Summary

Selecting a Manufacturing Execution System (MES)

Continuous Process Improvement Transformation Guidebook

Subj: POLICIES FOR INTEGRATED LOGISTICS OVERHAULS AND PHASED MAINTENANCE REVIEWS

Transcription:

A I R - 6. 0 L O G I S T I C S & I N D U S T R I A L O P E R A T I O N S AIR 6.0 2011 2012 Operational Plan Overview In October 2010, AIR-6.0 leadership released its 2011 Strategic Plan which identified the Logistics and Industrial Competency s long-term priorities, goals, and objectives. This 2011-2012 Operational Plan is a follow-on to the Strategic Plan and identifies the specific initiatives to be implemented within the next two years. The selection of a relatively small number of carefully-selected initiatives, led by national subject matter expert teams, will allow us to make measurable and sustainable progress across the organization and in all four of our Strategic Priority areas: Future Capability Current Readiness People Process, Productivity, and Communication Improvements (Enablers) This focused approach will allow us to move forward strategically while remaining agile and responsive to the emergent day-to-day needs of the Navy and Marine Corps, and our more than 4,000 employees and supporting contractors stationed worldwide. 2 0 1 1-2 0 1 2 O p e r a t i o n a l DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. P l a n 1

Definitions: Operational Plans and Initiatives Operational Plans are developed as part of the Competency s strategic planning process. Leadership will use the Operational Plans to describe specific initiatives and actions to be taken each year in order to maintain progress toward our longer-term strategic goals, while responding to emerging needs and opportunities. For our FY11-12 Operational Plan, potential initiatives were generated through review of recent customer surveys, management assessments of critical competency gaps, and actions that have been directed to AIR- 6.0. In future Operational Plans, ideas for initiatives will also be solicited directly from our employees (in fact, completion of a website for employees to provide both feedback and improvement recommendations is part of an FY11 Initiative). Initiatives that were considered for the Operational Plan included national-level activities that would have significant positive impact on AIR-6.0 and/or our customers (by closing critical gaps or developing needed capability), and required collaborative effort across multiple departments and/or sites to complete. As a result, our approved FY11-12 Initiatives are just a few of the many activities that AIR-6.0 will carry out over the next couple of years, and certainly are not the only efforts being executed that support the Admiral s strategic goals, and NAVAIR and NAE objectives. The Initiatives The 2011-2012 Operational Plan has eighteen (18) Initiatives; thirteen (13) of these are new starts that will begin activity in FY11 and be completed no later than FY12. The remaining initiatives were begun in FY10 and are being carried forward into this Operational Plan, and will also be completed by the end of FY12.* Each initiative has been assigned a single senior-level executive or manager to serve as the initiative s Executive Champion. Executive Champions have accountability and overall responsibility for their assigned initiatives, including developing success criteria/measures, project plans and deliverables; building and motivating teams; and reporting project status, challenges and risks to AIR-6.0 leadership on a regular basis. Our initiatives* are aligned to Strategic Priority Areas (Future Capability, Current Readiness, People, or Enablers), and are briefly described in the following sections. Also identified for each initiative is the: Initiative Champion Strategic objective(s) that the Initiative supports; objectives are summarized at the top of each Strategic Priority section (Note that an Initiative can support multiple objectives.) * Initiatives started in FY10 and carried forward into this Operational Plan are designated with a (*) in the subsequent pages. 2 0 1 1-2 0 1 2 O p e r a t i o n a l P l a n 2

Strategic Priority: Future Capability GOAL: ENSURE LOGISTICS AND SUSTAINMENT CONSIDERATIONS ARE INCORPORATED EARLY INTO THE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF AVIATION WEAPON SYSTEMS, DELIVERING MORE AFFORDABLE AND SUPPORTABLE CAPABILITIES TO THE USN/USMC. 1. Develop innovative & affordable support strategies for new & transitioning platforms, ensuring compliance with logistics process and infrastructure standards, sharing of best practices between programs, & expediting urgent warfighting capability acquisitions when required. 2. Determine, articulate, & properly incentivize supportability in procurement strategies & contract language early in the acquisition process. 3. Engage NAE stakeholders throughout the acquisition phase to ensure Future Capability sustainment requirements are clearly communicated. Initiative 1 (FC 1): Establish Virtual Center of Logistics Excellence Champion: Mr. Mike Overs, AIR-6.6.1 APEO(A)-L Limited expert logistics influence early and upfront in the acquisition process drives inadequate logistics budgets, high Total Ownership Cost (TOC), and support system delays. This Initiative will establish a virtual center of logistics excellence, capable of assisting the logistics workforce in all aspects of early acquisition planning. Supports Future Capability Objective(s): #1, 2, 3 Initiative 2 (FC 2): FMECA Procurement Guidelines (Logistics Impact Assessment) Champion: Mr. Dave Swanson, AIR-6.7.1 Inadequate and/or untimely maintenance planning results in improper identification of logistics requirements, insufficient support system development, and a lack of logistics influence on weapon system design. This Initiative will establish procedural guidance that supports timely FMECA assessment to enable effective design influence and maintenance planning. Focus on the importance of the FMECA on logistics support system development will be emphasized in cross-competency policy working groups and integrated into logistics training courses. Supports Future Capability Objective(s): #1, 2 Initiative 3 (FC 3): Support System Design Review (SSDR) Champion: Mr. Mike O Mealy, AIR-6.6 TD Programs continue to face significant risks due to a general lack of awareness of Operation and Support (O&S) Cost Drivers & their relationships, a failure to utilize an IMS for the Support System (Acquisition through Delivery), not having a Support System Requirements Trade Process or early Stakeholder engagement, and, lack of true Support System product integration. This Initiative will fully develop and implement a Support System Design Review (SSDR) methodology that validates/demonstrates support system acquisition, integration and delivery processes. A pilot SSDR will be completed on one T/M/S platform. Supports Future Capability Objective(s): #1, 2, 3 2 0 1 1-2 0 1 2 O p e r a t i o n a l P l a n 3

Strategic Priority: Current Readiness GOAL: SUSTAIN AND IMPROVE FIELDED LOGISTICS AND MAINTENANCE SUPPORT SYSTEMS TO ENSURE AVIATION WARFIGHTING ASSETS MEET THE NAVY AND MARINE CORPS DEMAND FOR AIRCRAFT READY FOR TASKING, AT THE LOWEST POSSIBLE COST. 1. Deliver products to all customers on time/cost, responding with agility when required to meet warfighter demands, while maintaining the highest of quality standards. 2. Communicate In Service Support resources needed to ensure safety and readiness levels are achieved, enabling NAE Stakeholders and Resource Sponsors to make betterbalanced, risk based funding decisions. 3. Develop robust capabilities to analyze performance of our support systems and impacts on total ownership costs & readiness, within and across T/M/S Teams. 4. Identify, develop, & implement solutions to improve in service logistics support processes & maintenance practices that affect supportability, maintainability, & affordability. Initiative 1 (CR 1): In-Service Analysis Toolset, Common across Weapon System Platforms Champion: Mr. Dan Nega, AIR-6.8 A common, standardized method/analysis toolset to identify and address cost drivers across currently fielded systems, which can be used by in-service logisticians, does not exist. This Initiative will develop a common set of analysis tools & metrics for PEOs/PMAs to use to measure in-service support systems. Supports Current Readiness Objective(s): #1, 3 Initiative 2 (CR 2): Improve Technical Data Delivery and Usage for Fleet Readiness Center (FRC) Production Champion: Mr. Garry Newton, Deputy COMFRC (Acting) Difficulty integrating "High 6.0" logistics expertise into the "Low 6.0" organization has lead to inefficiencies and higher production costs. This Initiative will leverage technology for digital data management at the FRCs, providing artisans access to technical data on the production floor in the shadow of the aircraft. Supports Current Readiness Objective(s): #4 Initiative 3 (CR 3): Common Cross-Platform In-Service Maintenance Planning Sustainment Process Champion: Mr. Dave Swanson, AIR-6.7.1 After initial fielding of systems, supportability analysis is either not performed or is done inconsistently across programs, which results in increased maintenance costs, sub-optimal fleet support infrastructure, and reduced weapon system readiness. This Initiative will develop a common in-service maintenance planning sustainment process and set of assessment tools, and will deploy them throughout NAVAIR Program Offices. Supports Current Readiness Objective(s): #3 Initiative 4 (CR 4) *: AIR-6.0 Models the Outcomes (Value) Resulting From Funding In-Service Support Requirements Champion: Mr. Dan Nega, AIR-6.8 Continue to refine the Air Systems Support Model and achieve OPNAV model accreditation in FY12. Supports Current Readiness Objective(s): # 2 2 0 1 1-2 0 1 2 O p e r a t i o n a l P l a n 4

Strategic Priority: People GOAL: ATTRACT, RETAIN AND DEVELOP OUR WORKFORCE TO MEET 21ST CENTURY NAVAL AVIATION CHALLENGES. 1. Develop & sustain a long range Total Workforce Plan that identifies the optimal size/skill mix needed to meet future requirements, & the activities necessary to posture the Competency accordingly. 2. Promote an environment that values innovation, diversity, and achievement of both individual and team excellence. 3. Ensure long term stability by expediting hiring of high quality talent (reassigning when required to meet urgent customer needs) & removing recruitment & retention barriers. 4. Ensure our workforce has the skills needed to support current & long term needs, with a focus on improving technical training & increasing knowledge of Continuous Process Improvement (CPI) principles. Initiative 1 (P 1): National AIR-6.0 Personnel Staffing Improvement Initiative Champion: Mr. Sonny Fann, AIR-6.0C Our timeliness in filling civilian and military vacancy requirements is considered excessive by both our customers and managers. This initiative will develop a consistent methodology to effectively manage civilian and military staffing for 6.0 competency and program team positions; and implement innovative recruiting, reassignment, and billeting processes to reduce placement cycle time. Supports People Objective(s): #2, 3 Initiative 2 (P 2): National AIR-6.0 Workforce Skills Development Strategy Champion: AIR-6.6 Dept Director (Mr. Mike O Mealy, Acting) With anticipated attrition and both present and future workload demands, our existing range and depth of logisticians will not be adequate to meet customer requirements. AIR-6.0 requires a cohesive national strategy to develop/recruit and procure needed expertise. This Initiative will identify essential logistics acquisition and sustainment functions and the processes and tools needed to close proficiency gaps. This is the first step in designing a comprehensive workforce strategy for the 6.0 Competency. Supports People Objective(s): #1, 4 Initiative 3 (P 3): National AIR-6.0 Master Logistics Skills List Champion: AIR-6.6 Dept Director (Mr. Mike O Mealy, Acting) A standardized or common method that can be used to assess an individual s skills gap against what is required for a specific position or assignment does not exist. These skills gap assessments are critical for determining cross-competency training course needs and for supervisors to outline Individual Development Plan (IDP) requirements for their employees. This Initiative will develop a Master Skills List for each job category that is essential for delivering logistics acquisition and sustainment services to our customers. This inventory will enable effective skills gap assessments and support effective staffing and development. Supports People Objective(s): #1, 4 2 0 1 1-2 0 1 2 O p e r a t i o n a l P l a n 5

Enablers: Process, Productivity, and Communication Improvements GOAL: DRIVE PROCESS, PRODUCTIVITY, AND COMMUNICATION IMPROVEMENTS AT ALL LEVELS OF THE ORGANIZATION. 1. Improve communications across the Logistics organization and with our stakeholders and customers, in order to broaden awareness, understanding, &encourage innovation amongst our workforce. 2. Embed Continuous Process Improvement into the culture across AIR 6.0, & encourage consistent use of CPI principles to meet strategic objectives and management goals, at all levels of the organization. 3. Ensure our workforce has access to the procedures, tools, & processes needed to most effectively and efficiently do their jobs. Initiative 1 (E 1): Establish AIR-6.0 Competency Operating Guide Champion: Mr. Joe Incorvia, AIR-6.0T There is currently a lack of understanding (both internal and external to 6.0) of our AIR-6.0 operations, as well as the functions, structure, and management processes that guide our national organization. This Initiative will document and publish this information in an AIR-6.0 Operating Guide, based on the draft AIR-6.0 Operating Guide and NAVAIR CAO Concept of Operations Guide. Supports Enablers Objective(s): #1, 2, 3 Initiative 2 (E 2): Develop an Internal and External AIR-6.0 Communication Strategy Champion: RDML Matthews AIR-6.0 needs to improve the effectiveness and timeliness of its communications, internally to NAVAIR and across the workforce, specifically, and to external organizations across the Navy and Marine Corps. This Initiative will establish a national communication strategy to increase awareness and support of AIR- 6.0 priorities, initiatives and accomplishments; and effectively address the information needs of employees, and its customers and stakeholders. Supports Enablers Objective(s): #1, 2 Initiative 3 (E 3): Requirements Document for Storing and Hosting Logistics Processes/Tools Champion: Mr. Garry Newton, AIR-6.0A Many information systems for storing "knowledge artifacts" currently exist (websites, shared drives, portals, wiki sites, e-rooms, etc.). However, most are site/department-specific and contain duplicative data (often outdated/non-authoritative) or are missing user-needed information. This Initiative will develop a national AIR-6.0 approach for storing and enabling all-employee access to consistent and accurate information, from anywhere across the national organization. Supports Enablers Objective(s): #1, 2, 3 2 0 1 1-2 0 1 2 O p e r a t i o n a l P l a n 6

Initiative 4 (E 4): Enablers (continued) Release an Updated AIR-6.0/COMFRC CPI Strategy Champion: RDML Matthews We have not fully leveraged the benefits that Continuous Process Improvement (CPI) can bring to the AIR-6.0 organization, nor have we communicated the Admiral s commitment to integrating CPI training, improvement efforts, and performance measures into our everyday business. This Initiative will finalize and publish the AIR-6.0 Continuous Process Improvement (CPI) strategy. This three-year plan will contain specific actions and deliverables to implement RDML Matthews vision of a high-performing CPIenabled organization. Supports Enablers Objective(s): #1, 2, 3 Initiative 5 (E 5) *: Align, Prioritize, and Apply Focus to AIR-6.0 and COMFRC Activities Needed For Long Term Success Champion: Mr. Joe Incorvia, AIR-6.0T Continue to refine the Strategic and Operational Planning processes, developing mechanisms to better integrate leadership and customer priorities, external factors, and workforce feedback into strategic decision making. Supports Enablers Objective(s): #1, 2 Initiative 6 (E 6) *: Monitor Progress Against Long- And Short-Term Goals Via Scorecard/Metrics * Champion: Mr. Joe Incorvia, AIR-6.0T Develop the basis of measurement and process for measuring and collecting metrics identified in the Strategic Plan, which will be used to assess whether results being achieved through our Initiatives are having the intended effect(s). Supports Enablers Objective(s): # 2 Initiative 7 (E 7) *: Develop Product Support Process Framework Strategy and Product Support Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) Champion: AIR-6.6 Dept Director (Mr. Mike O Mealy, Acting) Develop a standard but tailorable logistics IMS for use by program teams, that includes all product (ie. logistics) support elements and management items. Core products/processes (and how they are connected) will be documented, with the high-level info presented in a DoD 5000-like acquisition lifecycle wall chart. Supports Enablers Objective(s): # 2, 3 2 0 1 1-2 0 1 2 O p e r a t i o n a l P l a n 7

Executing the Operational Plan Progress Monitoring and Leadership Reporting Sponsors will develop reporting measures and success criteria for each initiative to provide leadership with insight on progress and performance. Reporting to the executive leadership team will occur on a recurring basis, which provides a forum for awareness and quick resolution of issues (when required), and drives results and accountability. Communication Initiatives may guide the development and introduction of new AIR-6.0 programs and policies. As such, a communication strategy will be implemented to ensure employees and customers/stakeholders are provided with timely information so they can understand how these Initiatives will benefit them. Update AIR-6.0 will begin implementing these initiatives in FY11. This Operational Plan should be considered a living document, as we will adapt and adjust our efforts to meet new and/or accelerating priorities. Follow-on Operational Plans will be influenced by annual reviews of existing national initiatives, customer expectations, and environmental scans. Successful local (department/site) efforts will also influence future national initiatives, as we seek to replicate positive outcomes to drive continual improvement and best practices across the organization. Closing The Logistics and Industrial Competency will focus on key national initiatives in FY11-12 that will drive progress in each of our strategic priority areas. Maintaining a needed balance between strategy and day-today execution, we will ensure that the Sailors and Marines we support remain at the forefront of everything we do. AIR 6.0 welcomes comments and suggestions regarding this Operational Plan. Please forward to your supervisor or submit via the Feedback form on the AIR-6.0 MyNAVAIR Community of Interest. 2 0 1 1-2 0 1 2 O p e r a t i o n a l P l a n 8