Pharmaceutical Sustainability Initiatives

Similar documents
BEYOND O&M. Shawn Maurer SEDAC Building Energy Specialist. Smart Energy Design Assistance Center (SEDAC), University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign

Condenser Water Heat Recovery"

YWCA 1503 S. Denver Tulsa, Oklahoma 5/18/2010 Performed By

CHP Case Studies. Midwest CHP Application Center (MAC) .org (312) University of Illinois at Chicago Energy Resources Center UIC

Electric Forward Market Report

LIBRARY ENERGY WALK- THROUGH. Andy Robinson, Training and Education, SEDAC

Administration Division Public Works Department Anchorage: Performance. Value. Results.

Energy Report - February 2008

Local Water Supply Planning - North Carolina Division of Water Resources

ENERGY MANAGEMENT IN A CHILLED WATER PLANT USING THERMAL STORAGE

Optimizing Energy Use in a HealthCare Setting. Michael P. Della Barba Environmental Health & Engineering, Director of Commissioning

Ground-Coupled Heat Pump And Energy Storage

Powering Michigan Agriculture with Renewable Energy

Establishing a Baseline, Energy Audits and Energy Star s Portfolio Manager

Application of a cooling tower model for optimizing energy use


Existing Building Cx: Processes & Results A Cultural Journey. Barry Abramson Senior Vice President Servidyne

Union College Combined Cooling, Heat and Power Project

Heating the University of Glasgow with river sourced heat pumps. Adam McConkey Andrew Poon-King Zhibin Yu

Achieving a cost optimal balance between heat supply efficiency and moderation of demand

Efficient utilization of energy sources

Texas Hospital. Central Plant Redesign. Central Utility Plant SECOND PLACE HEALTH CARE FACILITIES, EXISTING 2013 ASHRAE TECHNOLOGY AWARD CASE STUDIES

Monterey Salinas Transit Water Use Analysis for the Monterey Operations and Maintenance (TDA) Facility Renovation and Expansion Project

Modeling and analyzing solar cooling systems in Polysun

9/13/2011. Mark Hanicits, Director of Facilities and Safety, MetroSouth Medical Center. Terry Malloy P.E., Cxa, Project Manager, Teng & Associates

Urban Greening and the UHI: Seasonal Trade-offs in Heating and Cooling Energy Consumption in Manchester, UK

Implications of Measured Commercial Building Loads on Geothermal System Sizing

Introduction and purpose of this meeting. A New Day in Energy Management

Giuseppe Giordano Founder & CEO

a comparative study of secondary glycol and direct expansion refrigeration systems

Ohio. Market Guide. AEP Columbus Southern Power AEP Ohio Power Dayton Power & Light. Residential Customers:

Marysville School District Resource Conservation Program. John Bingham Marysville S.D. Ray Burton Snohomish Co. P.U.D.

Low-Hanging Fruit Simple Steps Toward Energy Effective Building Operations

Microturbine CHP for Microgrids Microgrid2017

I/I Analysis & Water Balance Modelling. Presented by Paul Edwards

METHODOLOGY The process starts with a collection of available information, continued by an audit in loco, it is

ISO Monitoring and Measurement Nonconformance and Corrective and Preventative Action

Solar Energy Technologies

F. Kabus, G. Möllmann, F. Hoffmann and J. Bartels GTN Geothermie Neubrandenburg GmbH, Seestrasse 7A, Neubrandenburg, Germany

PU-BENEFS PU-BENEFS. Feasibility study report. Bridge Park Community Leisure Centre At Brentfield, Harrow Road London NW10 0RG Country: United Kingdom

OPTIMIZATION OF ICE THERMAL STORAGE SYSTEM DESIGN FOR HVAC SYSTEMS

Value of Air Source Heat Pumps in Light of Variable Energy Prices. Jeff Haase. Energy Design Conference February 27, 2013

SIEMENS Year 3 Annual Energy Performance Report for Jackson County School District April 2010 May 2011

One year in the Colourworks

Welcome Waste Water Quality Breakout

AN INTRODUCTION TO WEATHER NORMALIZATION OF UTILITY BILLS FOR ALTERNATIVE ENERGY CONTRACTORS. John Avina, Director Abraxas Energy Consulting

Solar heating system sizing Solar storage tank size (volume) Solar collector array size (area)

Sea Water Heat Pump Project

Financial Intelligence NCIA 2016 National Training Conference Pittsburg April 18 th & 19 th

Premium Sample Reports

Reducing Peak Energy Demand: The Hidden Benefit of Cool Roofs

BB&E GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY. Prepared For: General Services Administration (GSA) Joint Base Andrews, Maryland.

Traffic Division Public Works Department Anchorage: Performance. Value. Results.

The Project for renovation to increase the efficient use in Brewery by NEDO at Bia Thanh Hoa Brewery in Vietnam

Using Wind Energy on Farms

Energy Reduction Strategy Through 2020

COURSE LISTING. Courses Listed. with Customer Relationship Management (CRM) SAP CRM. 15 December 2017 (12:23 GMT)

Comprehensive Energy Audit For Kongiganak Health Clinic

An evaluation of cooling system water efficiencies and efficiency improvement strategies within Victoria, Australia,

Exploiting the Free, Renewable Energy, Above and Below your Farm. Michigan State University March 10, 2016

Pumped hydro Storage Plants

IAF Advisors Energy Market Outlook Kyle Cooper, (713) , October 31, 2014

Retrocommissioning (RCx)

GHG emission reduction through the JCM scheme

Implementing Low-Cost Energy Savings Projects & Conducting Energy Audits

Hotels: Water and Energy

Environmental Protection Licence 2688

CONDENSING TEMPERATURE CONTROL THROUGH ENERGY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SIMULATON FOR A LARGE OFFICE BUILDING

Sentido Palm Royale Resort Soma Bay Annual sustainability report 2016/17 New Concepts.New Trends

Results and Recommendations from Energy Audit of Shageluk. For VEEP Grants Village of Shageluk, Alaska

November 28, Dear Mr. Bechtold:

U.S. Farm and Retail Egg Price Relationships to 2005 Changing Share of the Consumer's Egg Dollar

ENERGY AND WATER CONSERVATION AND DEMAND MANAGEMENT PLAN

The OWASA UNC Reclaimed Water System: A Progress Review

ISPE CASA Energy Management Forum - Energy Management of Capital Projects at Novartis

Saline Water - Considerations for Future Water Supply. Bruce Thomson Water Resources Program UNM

THREE POWERFUL UTILITY BILL ANALYSIS METHODS FOR THE ENERGY MANAGER. John Avina, Director Abraxas Energy Consulting

Farm Energy Efficiency June Collin Macpherson - JCM Solutions

For. Prepared For ANTHC DEHE

Status of Canadian Energy Storage. Edward Morofsky Richard Stockton College May 2006

Héctor Rubio Plana Gas Natural, SDG S.A. 18th. June 2009

DOE Best Practice Software Tools. Joseph Chappell Adam Roget

DIRECTIONAL-BORE GROUND SOURCE HEAT PUMP FIELD REPORT

Raynet Software Lifecycle

ACEEE Hot Water Forum Water Heating, Distribution, and Use Efficiency. Unique Program Approaches in the Market

Improving WTP Performance Tools to Help Achieve Optimization

ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT FORM-V SYNTHETIC GYPSUM MANUFACTURING PLANT M/S SHREE CEMENT LIMITED, BEAWAR, (RAJASTHAN) APRIL, 2010 to MARCH 2011 PART A

CIBSE Building Performance Innovation in Buildings - New Technologies: What is their role in building performance?

Effects of Condominium Submetering

Developing Solutions for the Environmental Challenges to Deploying PV Plants in Desert Areas

CHP Economic Factors: Electric and Natural Gas Market Trends PREPARED BY: PREPARED FOR: DATE:

Results and Recommendations from Energy Audit of Koyukuk. For VEEP Grants. City of Koyukuk, Alaska

Koeberg Nuclear Power Station. Water Resilience Strategy. Presenter: Velaphi Ntuli Date: 14 February 2018

Where Does It All Go?

Water Conservation Update

EFFECT OF VARYING ROOF RUN-OFF COEFFICIENT VALUES AND TANK SIZE ON RAINWATER HARVESTING SYSTEM S WATER SAVINGS IN MALAYSIA

Water Resources Director: Chris Graybeal

Project Report: SunMaxx Commercial Case Studies

CITY OF BOISE. page 1 INTRA-DEPARTMENT CORRESPONDENCE. Date: October 26, Public Works Commission. Matt Hightree, Scott Canning, Paul Wakagawa

Variable Frequency Drives Opportunities in Agriculture

Transcription:

Pharmaceutical Sustainability Initiatives Duane Hagen, CEA Energy and Systems Optimization Steam and Condensate System Specialist Technical Training Instructor

Primary Energy Sources Conversion of Energy

Defining Sustainability The capacity or ability to endure. The long term maintenance of well being that includes; Environmental Economic Societal In energy management the challenge is assessing how can the organization make the best use of its available resources and from this assessment develop action plans that maximizes the sustainability of energy using equipment while controlling costs.

Who s Directing Sustainability?

A Hagenism on Energy Optimization If you can t change what you pay for fuel, you should be wise enough to change how much fuel you use. Therefore you must know what that usage is and optimize the performance of energy using systems.

Energy and Utility System Optimization Project Goals 1. Determine the Existing Conditions. 2. Define the Proposed Conditions. 3. Subtract the Second from the First. Of Critical Importance: Defining the Existing Conditions

System Optimization Guidelines Design Implement Sustain Sustainability is the key to success.

A Hagenism on The Value of Metering When pursuing energy efficiency what we don t know we can t control. What we can control we can optimize. What we can optimize we can realize as an ROI.

kwh Demand 35 kv Main Meter Demand Trending Understanding Your Facilities Energy Load Language

Tracking and Trending for Cause and Effect Day Time Dew Pt Humidity Dry Bulb Wet Bulb Demand kw Total kwh Energy kwh 15-min 6/21/2011 15:45:00 76.82 62.39 92.15 80.52 6,681.00 129,680.34 1,668.96 Allow the Data to Lead the Sustainability Discussion How can the Energy Team communicate effectively the importance of load reduction? What can be done to hold the HPD below 7000 kwh during this cooling season? Are all unoccupied areas and equipment that are non-essential powered down? Are the chillers, pumps and towers operating at maximum efficiency? What cost effective improvements can be made to increase efficiency?

3-year MMBtu Usage for 1 Million Square Feet of Facility Linear Regression Analysis Data 2008 kwh 2009 kwh 2010 kwh Month # of Days Average CDD 3-yr Av. kwh/day Month # of Days Actual Actual Actual January 31 0 70,715.0538 January 31 2,219,000 2,257,500 2,100,000 February 28 0 75,041.6667 February 28 1,932,000 1,921,500 2,450,000 March 31 8 66,951.6129 March 31 2,110,500 2,079,000 2,037,000 April 30 42 70,855.5556 April 30 2,107,000 2,068,500 2,201,500 May 31 157 76,698.9247 May 31 2,110,500 2,373,000 2,649,500 June 30 371 101,227.7778 June 30 2,856,000 2,985,500 3,269,000 July 31 525 113,677.4194 July 31 3,643,500 3,110,000 3,818,500 August 31 488 107,935.4839 August 31 3,230,500 3,115,000 3,692,500 September 30 267 96,755.5556 September 30 3,066,000 2,919,000 2,723,000 October 31 59 78,241.9355 October 31 2,842,000 2,121,000 2,313,500 November 30 4 68,833.3333 November 30 2,285,500 2,016,000 1,893,500 December 31 1 65,747.3118 December 31 2,110,500 2,138,500 1,865,500 Baseload Multiplier Cost/kWh kwh= ((multiplier*average CDD) + Baseload kwh) * Days in Month 69307 83.762 0.07 kwh= ((83.762* Average CDD) + 69,307 kwh) * Days in Month

2011 Electric Utility Summary Month Acutal kwh Usage 2011 AEP LPT Actual Billing Charge Projected kwh Usage Projected Cost @ $.07 Difference Between Projected and Acutal Usage Cost Difference Between Projected and Actual 2110 kwh Usage 2010 Actual Cost January 1,865,500 $107,791.82 2,148,842 $150,418.91 283,342 $42,627.09 2,100,000 $109,146.25 February 1,645,000 $102,000.42 1,940,596 $135,841.72 295,596 $33,841.30 2,009,000 $127,556.89 March 1,823,500 $109,853.63 2,169,290 $151,850.30 345,790 $41,996.67 2,037,000 $112,573.37 April 1,855,000 $130,650.18 2,184,750 $152,932.51 329,750 $22,282.33 2,201,500 $121,727.03 May 2,565,500 $186,624.38 2,556,187 $178,933.07-9,313 -$7,691.31 2,649,500 $150,116.61 June 2,996,000 $219,382.53 3,011,481 $210,803.67 15,481 -$8,578.86 3,269,000 $178,293.43 July 3,552,500 $185,905.59 3,511,744 $245,822.05-40,756 $59,916.46 3,818,500 $214,212.31 August 3,262,000 $223,780.48 3,415,669 $239,096.80 153,669 $15,316.32 3,692,500 $243,776.35 September 2,750,144 $192,510.05 2,723,000 $187,445.43 October 2,301,718 $161,120.24 2,313,500 $156,889.80 November 2,089,733 $146,281.28 1,893,500 $137,794.03 December 2,150,464 $150,532.51 1,914,500 $111,575.15 Totals 19,565,000 $1,265,989.03 30,230,616 $2,116,143.11 1,373,557 $199,709.99 30,621,500 $1,851,106.65

2011 Electric Utility Summary Month Acutal kwh Usage 2011 AEP LPT Actual Billing Charge Projected kwh Usage Projected Cost at Budgetary Pricing Difference Between Projected and Acutal Usage Difference Between Projected and Actual Cost 3-yr Average kwh Usage 3-yr Average Cost at Budgetary Pricing January 1,865,500 $107,791.82 2,148,842 $150,418.91 283,342 $42,627.09 2,192,167 $153,451.67 February 1,645,000 $102,000.42 1,940,596 $135,841.72 295,596 $33,841.30 2,101,167 $147,081.67 March 1,823,500 $109,853.63 2,169,290 $151,850.30 345,790 $41,996.67 2,075,500 $145,285.00 April 1,855,000 $130,650.18 2,184,750 $152,932.51 329,750 $22,282.33 2,125,667 $148,796.67 May 2,565,500 $186,624.38 2,556,187 $178,933.07-9,313 -$7,691.31 2,377,667 $166,436.67 June 2,996,000 $219,382.53 3,011,481 $210,803.67 15,481 -$8,578.86 3,036,833 $212,578.33 July 3,552,500 $185,905.59 3,511,744 $245,822.05-40,756 $59,916.46 3,524,000 $246,680.00 August 3,262,000 $223,780.48 3,415,669 $239,096.80 153,669 $15,316.32 3,346,000 $234,220.00 September 2,750,144 $192,510.05 2,902,667 $203,186.67 October 2,301,718 $161,120.24 2,425,500 $169,785.00 November 2,089,733 $146,281.28 2,065,000 $144,550.00 December 2,150,464 $150,532.51 2,038,167 $142,671.67 Totals 19,565,000 $1,265,989.03 30,230,616 $2,116,143.11 1,373,557 $199,709.99 30,210,333 $2,114,723.33

2011 Electric Utility Summary

2011 Electric Utility Summary

3-year MMBtu Usage for 1 Million Square Feet of Facility Linear Regression Analysis Data 2008 MMBtu 2009 MMBtu 2010 MMBtu MMBtu Month # of Days Actual Actual Actual Month # of Days Average HDD 3-yr Av./Day January 31 37,353 42,120 37,672 January 31 1523 1,260 Febuary 28 40,618 30,027 33,303 Febuary 28 1312 1,237 March 31 35,596 30,196 28,848 March 31 1184 1,018 April 30 22,919 23,291 19,533 April 30 791 730 May 31 20,232 16,998 14,507 May 31 617 556 June 30 12,875 13,719 14,814 June 30 517 460 July 31 14,016 12,962 11,789 July 31 529 417 August 31 12,359 11,301 13,118 August 31 531 395 September 30 14,361 13,421 15,025 September 30 539 476 October 31 23,159 19,624 19,487 October 31 742 670 November 30 24,766 22,174 28,414 November 30 992 837 December 31 40,817 39,242 35,452 December 31 1368 1,242 MMBtu= ((multiplier* Average HDD) + Baseload MMBtu) * Days in Month Baseload Multiplier 1st Quarter Only Cost/MMBtu MMBtu= ((.8949* Average HDD) + 18.944 MMBtu) * Days in Month 18.944 0.8949 $5.00 $5.50

2011 Natural Gas Utility Summary Month 2011 Acutal MMBtu Usage Actual Cost Projected MMBtu Usage Projected Cost Difference Between Projected and Acutal Usage Cost Difference Between Projected and Actual 2010 Acutal MMBtu Usage 2010 Actual MMBtu Cost January 37,271 $186,355.00 42,831 $214,153.90 5,560 $27,798.90 37,672 $316,990.85 Febuary 30,671 $153,355.00 33,417 $167,085.86 2,746 $13,730.86 33,303 $280,227.92 March 28,823 $144,115.00 33,436 $167,177.62 4,613 $23,062.62 28,848 $242,741.35 April 20,226 $111,243.00 21,795 $119,874.41 1,569 $8,631.41 19,533 $164,360.33 May 18,371 $101,040.50 17,711 $97,412.78-660 ($3,627.72) 14,507 $122,069.08 June 15,982 $87,901.00 14,446 $79,455.36-1,535.57 ($8,445.64) 14,814 $124,652.33 July 10,284 $56,562.00 15,268 $83,975.53 4,984.28 $27,413.53 11,789 $99,198.48 August 12,398 $68,189.00 15,316 $84,240.00 2,918.36 $16,051.00 13,118 $110,381.34 September 15,041 $82,723.54 15,025 $126,427.79 October 21,164 $116,403.96 19,487 $163,973.26 November 27,190 $149,543.93 28,414 $239,089.46 December 38,538 $211,960.01 35,452 $298,310.67 Totals 174,026 $908,760.50 296,154 $1,574,006.88 20,195 $104,614.95 271,962 $2,288,422.87

2011 Natural Gas Utility Summary 2011 Acutal MMBtu Usage Difference Between Projected and Acutal Usage Cost Difference Between Projected and Actual 3-yr Average MMBtu Budgeted Cost 2011 Actual Projected 3-yr Average Month Cost MMBtu Usage Projected Cost MMBtu Usage January 37,271 $186,355.00 42,831 $214,153.90 5,560 $27,798.90 39,048 $195,241.67 Febuary 30,671 $153,355.00 33,417 $167,085.86 2,746 $13,730.86 34,649 $173,246.67 March 28,823 $144,115.00 33,436 $167,177.62 4,613 $23,062.62 31,547 $157,733.33 April 20,226 $111,243.00 21,795 $119,874.41 1,569 $8,631.41 21,914 $120,528.83 May 18,371 $101,040.50 17,711 $97,412.78-660 ($3,627.72) 17,246 $94,851.17 June 15,982 $87,901.00 14,446 $79,455.36-1,536 ($8,445.64) 13,803 $75,914.67 July 10,284 $56,562.00 15,268 $83,975.53 4,984 $27,413.53 12,922 $71,072.83 August 12,398 $68,189.00 15,316 $84,240.00 2,918 $16,051.00 12,259 $67,426.33 September 15,041 $82,723.54 14,269 $78,479.50 October 21,164 $116,403.96 20,757 $114,161.67 November 27,190 $149,543.93 25,118 $138,149.00 December 38,538 $211,960.01 38,504 $211,770.17 Totals 174,026 $908,760.50 296,154 $1,574,006.88 20,195 $104,614.95 282,036 $1,498,575.83

2011 Natural Gas Utility Summary

2011 Natural Gas Utility Summary

Utilize the Tools to Determine Energy Problems

TOC 2 2 nd Floor Dept. 420 Condensate Recovery System Armstrong M10/250 Traps 879 to 881

TOC 2 2 nd Floor Dept. 421 Condensate Recovery System Armstrong M10/250 Traps 882 to 883

TOC 2 2 nd Floor Room A-343 Condensate Pumping System Both condensate recovery systems in departments 420 and 421 discharge into this large pumping system for return to TOC boiler plant on the 3 rd floor. This should be evaluated as part of the water hammer issues.

Reducing the Back Pressure on the Condensate Return System The steam traps that are blowing thru and leaking by are creating issues with over pressurization and replacing these failed traps will assist in reducing this back pressure some what. The bigger issue is system piping design that creates high pressure return zones that do not allow for the dryer coils, kettles and heat exchangers to free drain. This causes these system to operate flooded and this forces the control valves on these systems to operate at higher pressures than should be required to achieve thermal transfer. All of this is forcing the system to use more energy as it must operate at higher pressure. The results of the steam trap audit has yielded the following:

The True Cost of Steam

Tracking Cost Trends

Water Usage and Waste Water Treatment Water Factoids: 120 drops = 5mL 1 gallon = 3785 ml There are 90,840 Drops in 1 Gallon If a faucet dripped once a second how many gallons of water would it waste/year? 1 year ~ 31,536,000 seconds and 24 drops in 1 ml, thus 1 gallon/3785 ml x (1 ml/24 drops) x (1 drop/ 1 s) x (31,536,000 s/ 1 year) = 347.1598415 gallons/year

2008 to Present Water Cost to V of M (Less Service Fees) Month 2008 Gallons 2009 Gallons 2010 Gallons 2011 Gallons Jan $36,385.72 $25,006.76 $24,284.48 $24,475.71 Feb $29,739.50 $19,304.08 $23,164.74 $18,946.80 Mar $26,637.66 $28,866.60 $28,660.76 $19,820.51 Apr $33,450.34 $31,412.59 $27,169.52 $21,459.13 May $38,817.66 $30,185.73 $26,299.06 $33,939.98 Jun $41,598.76 $39,474.16 $38,947.99 $38,848.11 Jul $39,503.80 $34,177.08 $40,483.07 $44,375.39 Aug $42,853.30 $32,400.83 $39,267.91 $44,318.96 Sep $45,045.70 $32,891.68 $37,112.87 Oct $31,010.28 $23,326.73 $33,078.85 Nov $26,726.98 $22,596.74 $33,043.12 Dec $26,771.64 $24,470.84 $27,008.34 Total Usage $418,541.34 $344,113.83 $378,520.70 $246,184.60 Water Charge Rate $0.00406 per gallon

2008 to Present Waste Water Cost to V of M (Less Service Fees) Month 2008 Gallons 2009 Gallons 2010 Gallons 2011 Gallons Jan $40,060.14 $27,532.07 $26,736.86 $26,938.01 Feb $32,742.75 $21,253.51 $25,504.03 $20,636.65 Mar $29,327.67 $31,781.70 $31,065.16 $21,745.21 Apr $36,828.33 $32,498.60 $27,389.48 $22,171.65 May $40,574.19 $27,923.24 $25,103.97 $29,881.06 Jun $43,546.74 $24,432.13 $29,402.77 $30,627.99 Jul $40,596.54 $26,440.94 $27,849.44 $32,720.40 Aug $42,697.44 $23,669.99 $26,736.86 $34,212.49 Sep $45,951.60 $25,858.50 $25,504.03 Oct $33,636.75 $23,451.86 $31,065.16 Nov $29,426.01 $24,063.35 $27,389.48 Dec $29,475.18 $26,942.03 $25,103.97 Total Output $444,863.34 $315,847.92 $328,851.20 $218,933.45 Village Sewer Charge Rate: $0.00447 per gallon

Sustainability in Waste Water Reduction Cooling Tower Evaporation Rate versus Sewered Blow Down Metering Savings Analysis Month-2010 Incoming Gallons Sewered Blow Down Gallons Difference Savings January 0 0 0 $0.00 February 0 0 0 $0.00 March 124,000 14,400 109,600 $489.91 April 657,000 92,400 564,600 $2,523.76 May 1,114,000 260,500 853,500 $3,815.15 June 3,175,000 748,700 2,426,300 $10,845.56 July 3,776,000 860,100 2,915,900 $13,034.07 August 3,687,000 926,800 2,760,200 $12,338.09 September 1,848,000 401,000 1,447,000 $6,468.09 October 820,000 120,100 699,900 $3,128.55 November 341,000 22,400 318,600 $1,306.26 December 0 0 0 $0.00 Total: 15,418,000 3,446,400 12,095,600 $53,949.45 Sustainability = Green

Improving Efficiency and Reducing Costs

A Hagenism on the Basics of WWT It always flows downhill and if it stinks don t eat it.

Alternatives in Energy Sustainability

Carpe diem Latin Enjoy the day; Seize today's opportunities; Literally - Seize the day.