Next Generation Customer Information System. SFMTA Board of Directors Policy and Governance Committee March 23, 2018

Similar documents
The Next Next Generation Customer Information System

San Francisco Freeway Corridor Management Study (SF FCMS)

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

In addition to core elements on the foundation frameworks, the project will also include:

SFMTA Municipal Transportation Agency Image: police direct traffic as pedestrians, cars and streetcars pass by long ago; Muni centennial logo.

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY: 2016 CUSTOMER SATISFACTION STUDY

CTA Transit Operations & Technology Management Divisions

Where s the bus? Real-Time Info & Service Alerts

San Francisco Transportation Task Force 2045

TRANSIT SERVICE GUIDELINES

Title VI Fare Equity Analysis

Transit Marketing Study

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary

Public Input CHAPTER II INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY ADVISORY GROUP (CAG)

CAPITAL AREA TRANSIT PLANNING SERVICE STANDARDS AND PROCESS. Planning Department

Memorandum. Date: RE: Citizens Advisory Committee

CHAPTER IV REQUIREMENTS AND GUIDELINES FOR FIXED ROUTE TRANSIT PROVIDERS

Content of the module

Management and Integration of Data and Modeling at Santa Clara County Congestion Management Agency

Transit Investment Direction and Plan Introduction. Transportation Advisory Board TPP Workshop August 16, 2017

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

Proposed Overnight Service Pilot

Travel Behavior Inventory Household Survey Update. Transportation Committee

Request for Proposals for Real Time Passenger Information System

On Time Performance. PRESENTATION TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS Sept 24, Presented by Kenneth Mc Donald - COO Sonali Bose - CFO

2016 transit accessibility plan

FUTURE BUS RAPID TRANSIT PLANS

Caltrain Fare Study Update

Service Standards and Policies

Near-Real Time Data for Operational Monitoring and Control

Elements of a Complete Streets Policy Effective 2018

Attachment 2: Draft Business Plan Scope of Work

Purpose of the Countywide Transportation Plan SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY

Caltrain Rapid Rail Plan

Sustainability. Sustainability Principles. 1. Framework. Spokane Transit s definition of Sustainability is:

Introduction to Transportation Systems

Mobility on Demand for Improving Business Profits and User Satisfaction

Director of Transportation Planning

Transit Service Guidelines

ADVERTISING 2016 INFORMATION & RATES. Kim Britton, Marketing Director

Super Bowl 50 Service Plans, Safety Protocols and Communications

PURPOSE. Joint Transportation Committee (JTC) directed to:

Mobility-on-Demand. Committee. Regional New Mobility. February 13, 2017

SOUTHEAST FLORIDA REGIONAL COMPACT CLIMATE CHANGE. Sustainable Communities & Transportation Planning

TRANSIT SERVICES Business Plan

Kent County Transit Needs Assessment Scope of Work

BACKGROUND. The FasTracks Plan includes three core goals:

TRAFFIC ADVISORY LEAFLET

Camden County Travel Management Coordination Center Demonstration Project NJ

Efficient. Enhanced. Improved. Department of Community Services

General Population Survey Summary

Re-Engineering Call Handling and Customer Complaint Processing

Modeling Traffic Flow under Emergency Evacuation Situations: Current Practice and Future Direction

CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEY. Nevin Grinnell Marketing January 10, 2012

LARKSPUR SMART STATION AREA PLAN. Public Workshop December 3, 2013

THE REGION S PLAN POLICY FRAMEWORK. August 2015

2040 Transportation Policy Plan Conversion to Performance Based Planning Basis. 25 th Annual CTS Transportation Research Conference May 21, 2014

Transportation Concurrency

Tracking your Freigh Using IoT Fleet Monitoring and OTM

Category 3, BART Capacity, Access and Parking Improvements. Contra Costa Transportation Authority STAFF REPORT Page 2 of 5 The Authority directed staf

Published by Siemens AG 2017 Mobility Division Otto-Hahn-Ring Munich, Germany Order No. MOMM-B Printed in Germany Dispo No.

Strategic Transportation Plan. Presented to: ECO-Rapid Transit Board of Directors Presented by: Gill V. Hicks, Cambridge Systematics, Inc.

California State Rail Plan. Santa Cruz County Regional Transportation Commission November 2, 2017

VISION ZERO SF: ELIMINATING TRAFFIC DEATHS BY 2024 DECEMBER 13, 2016

THAT Council adopt the Congestion Management Strategy as outlined in this report

PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION PLAN

OneBusAway. Sharing real-time transit info

1.201 / / ESD.210 Transportation Systems Analysis: Demand and Economics. Assignment 2

RIDE-HAILING IMPACTS ON PARKING An overview created by Walker Consultants

Multi-modality assessments in promoting sustainable urban traffic

Public Outreach Notification Standards Public Outreach & Engagement Team Strategy (POETS) A Guide to Conducting Community Outreach for SFMTA Projects

Safety and Service Delivery Committee. Action Item III-A. January 11, 2018

DC Circulator 2018 Service Changes. Outreach Results Report May 2018

Metro s Guide to Accessibility and Independence

PRIVATE SHUTTLE STUDY

An Empirical Research on the Penetration Levels for a Call-a- Cab Service in Mumbai

DOWNTOWN AUSTIN PARKING STRATEGY DETAILED IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

Building the Regional Transit Strategy

KNOXVILLE REGIONAL TRANSIT CORRIDOR STUDY

Policy Brief. Three Transportation Revolutions: Synergies with Transit. Summary. Introduction

Travel Demand Modeling At NCTCOG

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

Bus Service RFI Routes Overview on Process

Investigating ITS Concepts for the Dulles Corridor Rapid Transit Project

Mobility on Demand (MOD) Sandbox Program. Carol Schweiger, President Schweiger Consulting LLC September 7, 2016

Chapter 10 Goals, Objectives + Policies

Miami-Dade Transit. Alice N. Bravo, P.E. Director. Miami-Dade Transit 1

Operations in the 21st Century DOT Meeting Customers Needs and Expectations

Inclusive Coalition Building. Lewis and Clark County Case Study

Downtown Parking Management Strategy. Goals. Key Concepts and Implementation Policies (IP) 1. Dept. responsible for implementing policy.

Subject 2015 MiWay Customer Satisfaction Survey Results. Recommendation

I-66 Corridor Improvements Outside the Capital Beltway in Northern Virginia, USA

MPC-514 July 21, 2016

2018 transit accessibility plan DRAFT

AMPO Annual Conference Session: Performance (Part 1) October 18, 2017 Savannah, GA

Kansas Rural Transit ITS Deployment

Smart Mobility. Presentation of SMTC Community of the Oise and the ITS Services. UTC GSU - Compiègne

S. F. Municipal Transportation Agency Citizens Advisory Council City & County of San Francisco RECOMMENDATIONS / MOTIONS 2017

Dec 1 st, 2016, Helsinki The Digital Revolution in Mobility Steven Ahlig, Innovative Technologies, Mobility Management, Siemens AG

Transcription:

Next Generation Customer Information System SFMTA Board of Directors Policy and Governance Committee March 23, 2018 1

WHY NOW? THE SAN FRANCISCO CONTEXT In 1999, San Francisco launched the first U.S. real-time information system Since then, technology and transportation choices have changed rapidly For the first time in 15+ years, we have a chance to do a refresh 2000 2018 2

A NEW TRANSPORTATION LANDSCAPE Transportation Network Company (TNC) Activity TNCs now generate 170,000 vehicle trips per day, typically with only 1 to 2 passengers 20-26% of peak period traffic in Downtown/SOMA, which delays Muni Concentrated in areas with extensive Muni service Source: TNCs Today: A Profile of San Francisco Transportation Network Company Activity (San Francisco County Transportation Authority) 3

PUBLIC OUTREACH WHAT DO OUR CUSTOMERS WANT? Methods Quantitative Comprehensive Survey (Available in English, Chinese and Spanish; online and paper upon request) 5,852 complete responses; ±1.3% margin of error at a 95% confidence level External Stakeholder Examples + Qualitative (including outreach to underrepresented groups) Concept Testing Stakeholder Interviews Ride-alongs 311 SF Board of Supervisors BART, Caltrain and other transit agencies SF Travel Chamber of Commerce SFMTA Citizens Advisory Council (CAC) Chinatown Community Development Center (CCDC) SFMTA Multimodal Accessibility Advisory Committee (MAAC) Chinatown Tenants Association SFMTA Policy and Governance Hotel Council SFUSD-Access Independent Living Resource Center Senior Action and Disability Network Lighthouse for the Blind SF Transit Riders Mercy Housing Youth Commission Rebuild Potrero The Village Save Muni 4

HOW THE NEW SYSTEM WILL ADDRESS DETERRENTS TO RIDERSHIP 5

WILLINGNESS TO WAIT FOR TRANSIT Waiting Time Until Next Muni Vehicle During the Day During the Evening or At Night When Transferring 5 min 97% 94% 93% 10 min 73% 67% 59% 15 min 35% 34% 22% 20 min 14% 15% 8% 30 min 5% 5% 3% Finding #1 When arriving randomly at a stop without any realtime information, customers are generally willing to wait 10 15 minutes. Finding #2 Wait tolerance declines significantly during the evening or at night Finding #3 Wait tolerance is significantly less for transfers 6

MUNI SERVICE FREQUENCY Rush Hour Service (Generally every 15 minutes or better) Late Evening Service (Generally every 20 to 30 minutes) Service frequency often meets customer expectations during the day, but not during the evening and other off-peak times 7

A 20-MINUTE WAIT: FOUR TEST SCENARIOS Survey presented customers with a hypothetical 20-minute Muni wait Respondents answered four situational questions testing how different types of information could influence mode choice 1 2 Customer arrives at shelter sign predicts a 20-minute wait 3 Countdown sign displays an earlier-arriving alternative 4 Checks smartphone before walking to stop, showing a 20-minute wait Customer's smartphone app also advertises Uber and Lyft 8

A 20-MINUTE WAIT: TOP LEVEL RESULTS 9

BETTER TRANSIT INFORMATION REDUCES INCOME DISPARITIES Survey confirms disparities in median household income by gender, ethnicity and other demographic variables As income rises people are less willing to wait for Muni The status quo can further a two-tiered transportation system based on income With better transit information, respondents are much more likely to ride Muni across all income brackets, regardless of demographic background Median Household Income: Female $75-100K, Male $100-125K People of Color: $50-75K, White: $100-125K 10

SAN FRANCISCO HAS MANY TRANSIT ALTERNATIVES With many parallel lines, taking an alternative Muni route is viable throughout much of San Francisco

IMPACTS OF TNC ADS ON MOBILE APPS Comparing the two scenarios with and without TNC ads on a transit app: The income gap reappears with TNC ads TNC ads decreased transit mode share by up to 14 percentage points depending on income bracket Median Household Income: Female $75-100K, Male $100-125K People of Color: $50-75K, White: $100-125K

MANY APPS PRIORITIZE TNC ADS OVER TRANSIT INFO Many third-party apps (63% market share) prominently advertise TNCs when displaying transit predictions obtained through open data 13

HIGHER TNC AVAILABILITY REDUCES TRANSIT MODE SHARE Higher TNC availability also reduces transit mode share across all income levels In TNC-dense areas, there is high potential to attract people to Muni with alternatives and other info 14

TRANSIT PASSES ENCOURAGE MUNI RIDERSHIP Finding #1 Of respondents riding at least four days per week where a pass could make financial sense, 34% pay-as-they-go. Finding #2 Compared to pass users, pay-asyou-go customers are more likely to consider other transportation modes for each trip Finding #3 Passes currently break even at 30 single rides compared to 27.5 in 2009 15

CUSTOMERS WANT A BETTER ENROUTE INFO EXPERIENCE On-Board Digital Signage "Have signs that work at every stop, update outages and line delays, and provide visual information on board vehicles to show transfers available at each stop...bring this very dated system into the 21st century. We live in a city of innovation...utilize it! Announce expected arrival times of intersecting routes at each stop. Solar-Powered Signage I do not own a smartphone. Please do not make the system so dependent on owning one "On board screens that show arrival times of connecting bus, MuniMetro, BART and Caltrain lines would be helpful. Sometimes it's not always convenient to check times on a phone when standing on a crowded bus or holding bags/handrails/kids, etc. 16

SYSTEM ELEMENTS Surface Vehicle Locations Gathers vehicle locations from CAD/AVL System Underground Locations Gathers vehicle locations from Automatic Train Control System Automatic Passenger Counters Gathers real-time ridership loads System Software Generates real-time vehicle predictions, monitors system status through a System Administration Tool, and displays information on customer interfaces through a Content Management System Analytics Platform Processes data from the System Software and Mobile Platform & Website to assist in operational and usage analysis Stationary Digital Signage Displays real-time arrivals, alternatives and other valuable info at rail stations, transit shelters and selected transit stops without power On-Board Digital Signage Provides back-end capability to display service updates, transfer connection times and other information on separately-procured on-board vehicle signs 17 Mobile Platform & Website Delivers travel information in mobile and online formats; Mobile App features an enhanced Trip Planner and collects customer behavior insights to inform planning decisions

POTENTIAL SYSTEM FEATURES System Features Current Future System Software Predictions Engine (improved) Crowding Level Alerts x Alternative Route Suggestions x Real-Time Temporary Service Changes (limited) Connections with other systems x (depends on API availability) Stationary Digital Signage Powered Shelters Unpowered Shelters & Stops x On-Board Digital Signage (back-end) Stop Announcements Connection Times x Service Delay & Reroute Alerts x Mobile Platform & Website Mobile App (primarily mobile ticketing) (enhanced capabilities) Accessible Itineraries x Analytics Platform Usage Trends & Analytics (limited) (enhanced capabilities) Incorporates input from customers and an internal multi-disciplinary team 18

CONCLUSIONS Technology and Transportation Technology has radically altered the transportation landscape Our system is adapting to the sharing economy Challenges and Opportunities The status quo could intensify inequities by creating income-based transportation systems Better real-time information has the potential to alter the psychology of mode choice and bring riders back to transit Real-time info can promote a more equitable and sustainable transportation system Lessons learned will help other transit systems prepare for the future 19 19

NEXT STEPS Phase Functionality Tentative Date Planning Request for Proposals Vendor Selection Contract Negotiations Spring 2018 - Fall 2018 1 1-for-1 replacement of existing shelter signs Real-time arrival predictions generated for each stop Mobile Platform & Website Analytics Platform (basic) 2 Additional signs at unpowered and non-shelter locations Transfer connection, service delay and travel alternatives functionality On-board signage (separate procurement) Analytics Platform (enhanced) Summer 2019 Summer 2020 - Fall 2021 20 20