Cattle on Feed. United States Cattle on Feed Up 9 Percent

Similar documents
Milk Production. January Milk Production up 1.8 Percent

Steers weighing 500 pounds and over, as of January 1, 2018, totaled 16.4 million head, down slightly from January 1, 2017.

Milk Production. January Milk Production up 2.7 Percent

United States and Canadian Cattle and Sheep

Grain Stocks. Corn Stocks Up 32 Percent from September 2016 Soybean Stocks Up 53 Percent All Wheat Stocks Down 11 Percent

Cattle on Feed. U.S. Cattle on Feed Up 4 Percent

Flour Milling Products

Grain Crushings and Co- Products Production 2016 Summary

Cattle Outlook. January, 2018

Grain Crushings and Co- Products Production 2017 Summary

Puerto Rico - Various

Corn Objective Yield Survey Data,

Citrus Fruits 2015 Summary

Apples had the highest total value of pollination of crops reported in Region 5 during in The price per colony

Announcement of Class and Component Prices United States Department of Agriculture

Land Values and Cash Rents

Iowa Farm Outlook. February 2015 Ames, Iowa Econ. Info Takeaways from the January Cattle Inventory Report

Small Grains 2017 Summary

Hop Area Harvested, Yield, Production, Price, and Value States and United States:

Iowa Farm Outlook. February 2016 Ames, Iowa Econ. Info Cattle Inventory Report Affirms What Happened in 2015 and What May Happen in 2016

Cattle Market Situation and Outlook

Non-Ambulatory Cattle and Calves

Facts on Direct-to-Consumer Food Marketing

All Mushroom Sales Virtually Unchanged, Value Down 1 Percent

Citrus Fruits. Final Estimates August United States Department of Agriculture. National Agricultural Statistics Service

Cattle Situation and Outlook

BUDGET BASICS TRAINING TOPIC: DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS. Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP)

Cattle & Beef Outlook

Weekly Mature U.S. Beef Cow Slaughter

Livestock and Feedgrain Outlook

Iowa Farm Outlook. December 2015 Ames, Iowa Econ. Info Replacement Quality Heifer Prices Supported by Latest Data

Hop Area Harvested, Yield, Production, Price, and Value States and United States:

Iowa Farm Outlook. June 2017 Ames, Iowa Econ. Info Strong Prices with Large Slaughter Suggest Firm Meat Demand

U.S. Broiler Industry Structure

Iowa Farm Outlook. November 2013 Ames, Iowa Econ. Info Is Beef Cattle Herd Rebuilding on the Horizon?

Cattle and Hay Outlook

Iowa Farm Outlook. More Beef Expansion Ahead. March 2018 Ames, Iowa Econ. Info. 2095

Livestock Enterprise. Budgets for Iowa 2017 File B1-21. Ag Decision Maker

Revised Estimated Returns Series Beginning in 2007

Cattle Market Outlook

3/25/2017. What to do today? Cattle & Beef Markets: Commodity Outlook

Situation and Outlook of the Canadian Livestock Industry

Iowa Farm Outlook. February 2018 Ames, Iowa Econ. Info Betting on the Come in the Fed Cattle Market

Beef Cattle Outlook Dr. Curt Lacy Extension Economist-Livestock

Land Values and Cash Rents: 2008 Summary

Historical Prices, Trends, Seasonal Indexes, and Future Basis of Cattle and Calves at Sioux Falls, South Dakota

Beef Cattle Outlook. Glynn Tonsor Dept. of Agricultural Economics Kansas State University

Cattle Situation and Outlook

Livestock Watering Systems. Mark Green Lead Resource Conservationist USDA-NRCS Springfield, MO

CALCULATING THE SUPPLEMENTAL NUTRITION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (SNAP) PROGRAM ACCESS INDEX: A STEP-BY-STEP GUIDE FOR 2013

HAY PRICES AND TRENDS IN WESTERN STATES

Iowa Farm Outlook. Department of Economics July 2013 Ames, Iowa Econ. Info Happy Independence Day!

TOC INDEX. Basis Levels in Cattle Markets. Alberta Agriculture Market Specialists. Introduction. What is Basis? How to Calculate Basis

Feed Grain Outlook June 2, 2014 Volume 23, Number 33

Iowa Farm Outlook. January 2017 Ames, Iowa Econ. Info Pork industry shaping itself for the future

US Imported Beef Market A Weekly Update

United States and Canadian Hogs and Pigs

Analysis & Comments. Livestock Marketing Information Center State Extension Services in Cooperation with USDA. National Hay Situation and Outlook

Intro to Livestock Marketing Annie s Project. Tim Petry Livestock Economist 2018

Iowa Farm Outlook. Big Supply, Strong Dollar Pressure Hog Prices. January 2016 Ames, Iowa Econ. Info. 2069

Telephone: (706) Animal and Dairy Science Department Rhodes Center for Animal and Dairy Science

Emmit L. Rawls Professor Agricultural Economics

NRCS Conservation Programs Update

Beef Cattle Market Outlook

Michigan s Dairy Industry. Ken Nobis, MMPA President

Iowa Farm Outlook. December 2017 Ames, Iowa Econ. Info Stretch Run for Meat Markets

Structural Changes in Cattle Feeding and Meat Packing

Iowa Farm Outlook. May 2015 Ames, Iowa Econ. Info Several Factors Supporting, Pressuring Fed Cattle Prices

What tools can we use to help us decide when to enter and when to exit a hedge? (Or, or for that matter, when to enter and exit any trade.

TEXAS A8cM UNIVERSITY TEXAS AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION SERVICE

Mink. Pelt Production Up 1 Percent

Iowa Farm Outlook. March 2014 Ames, Iowa Econ. Info Long-Term Projections for Beef Production and Trade

Sheep and Goats Predator Loss

October 20, 1998 Ames, Iowa Econ. Info U.S., WORLD CROP ESTIMATES TIGHTEN SOYBEAN SUPPLY- DEMAND:

Seasonal Trends in Steer Feeding Profits, Prices, and Performance

Iowa Farm Outlook. Livestock Price and Profitability Outlook

2017 Beef Cattle Market Outlook

NRCS Standards and Criteria for Dead Animal Composting

The Value of Improving the Performance of your Cow-Calf Operation

Characteristics of beef cattle operations in the West. C. Alan Rotz,* Senorpe Asem-Hiablie,* Robert Stout,* and Kathleen Fisher

WORKFORCE CONNECTIONS, INC. GRIEVANCE PROCEDURES

Cattle and Beef Markets: 2016 and beyond. Kate Brooks Department of Agricultural Economics

Iowa Farm Outlook. June 2015 Ames, Iowa Econ. Info Regional Hay-Pasture Situation and Outlook. Percent of National All Hay Stocks

OUTLOOK FOR US AGRICULTURE

Background and Assumptions

U.S. MARKET POTENTIAL FOR DRIED DISTILLERS GRAIN WITH. SOLUBLES a. Dept. of Agricultural Economics. Purdue University

Background and Assumptions

U.S. Packing Capacity Sufficient for Expanding Cattle Herd

Dairy Outlook. April By Jim Dunn Professor of Agricultural Economics, Penn State University. Market Psychology

Locally Led Conservation & The Local Work Group. Mark Habiger NRCS

Economics Associated with Beef Cattle Ranching. Larry Forero UC Cooperative Extension April 21, 2016

Bovine Tuberculosis Texas Situation Report

2014 Economic Contribution Analysis of the Washington Beef Industry

Water Talk Series

GUIDE TO ASSEMBLING DATA FOR COW-CALF

ANALYSIS OF MILK MOVEMENTS FROM DAIRY FARMS TO MILK PROCESSING PLANTS: MAY 2016 PACIFIC NORTHWEST ORDER. Staff Paper John Mykrantz.

Agri-Service Industry Report

Tennessee Market Highlights

Cattle Price Situation & Outlook

Farm Labor. Special Note

Transcription:

Cattle on Feed ISSN: 948-9080 Released March, 08, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United s Department of Agriculture (USDA). United s Cattle on Feed Up 9 Percent Cattle and calves on feed for the slaughter market in the United s for feedlots with capacity of,000 or more head totaled.7 million head on March, 08. The inventory was 9 percent above March, 07. Placements in feedlots during February totaled.8 million head, 7 percent above 07. Net placements were.76 million head. February, placements of cattle and calves weighing less than 600 pounds were 5,000 head, 600-699 pounds were 5,000 head, 700-799 pounds were 57,000 head, 800-899 pounds were 40,000 head, 900-999 pounds were,000 head, and,000 pounds and greater were,000 head. Marketings of fed cattle during February totaled.68 million head, percent above 07. Other disappearance totaled 57,000 head during February, percent above 07.

of Cattle on Feed, Placements, Marketings, and Other Disappearance on,000+ Capacity Feedlots United s: March, 07 and 08 Item On feed February... Placed on feed during February... Fed cattle marketed during February... Other disappearance during February... On feed March... 07 08 (,000 head) (,000 head) (percent) 0,78,694,648 56 0,77,60,87,675 57,75 08 07 0 0 09 of Cattle on Feed, Placements, Marketings, and Other Disappearance on,000+ Capacity Feedlots United s: February, 07 and 08 Item On feed January... Placed on feed during January... Fed cattle marketed during January... Other disappearance during January... On feed February... 07 08 (,000 head) (,000 head) (percent) 0,605,98,75 5 0,78,489,068,858 69,60 08 04 06 0 08 Cattle on Feed (March 08)

of Cattle on Feed on,000+ Capacity Feedlots by Month s and United s: 07 and 08 March, 07 February, 08 Arizona... California... Colorado... Idaho... Iowa... Kansas... Minnesota... Nebraska... Oklahoma... South Dakota... Texas... Washington... March, 08 previous month (,000 head) (,000 head) (,000 head) (percent) (percent) 4 40 90 6,0 60,4 95,4 85 80 485 960 60 70,0 70,670 0 60,6 05 85 490 9 55 70, 65,690 5 70,680 0 8 7 04 0 06 0 0 07 08 0 4 0 0 99 98 0 0 97 0 98 04 0 0 Other s... 0 0 5 0 98 United s... 0,77,60,75 09 0 Cattle on Feed Inventory on,000+ Capacity Feedlots United s Million head.0.5.0 0.5 07 08 0.0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Cattle on Feed (March 08)

of Cattle Placed on Feed on,000+ Capacity Feedlots by Month s and United s: 07 and 08 Arizona... California... Colorado... Idaho... Iowa... Kansas... Minnesota... Nebraska... Oklahoma... South Dakota... Texas... Washington... February 07 January 08 February 08 previous month (,000 head) (,000 head) (,000 head) (percent) (percent) 7 47 80 6 0 80 45 4 44 0 4 8 58 80 4 0 480 5 5 47 0 0 59 65 4 8 40 6 4 46 46 65 6 6 9 94 6 76 04 05 4 06 79 0 9 8 9 88 64 8 98 0 9 Other s... 7 5 4 4 8 United s...,694,068,87 07 88 of Cattle Placed on,000+ Capacity Feedlots United s Million head.5...9.7.5 07 08 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 4 Cattle on Feed (March 08)

of Cattle Placed on Feed by Weight Group on,000+ Capacity Feedlots and Month s and United s: 07 and 08 Colorado... Kansas... Nebraska... Texas... February 07 Under 600 lbs 600-699 lbs 700-799 lbs 800-899 lbs 900+ lbs 900-999 lbs,000+ lbs Total (,000 head) (,000 head) (,000 head) (,000 head) (,000 head) (,000 head) (,000 head) (,000 head) 5 70 75 70 0 85 5 55 0 55 0 80 80 45 0 Other s... 75 95 80 9 89 United s.. Colorado... Kansas... Nebraska... Texas... 5 0 490 95 January 08 Under 600 lbs 600-699 lbs 700-799 lbs 800-899 lbs 900+ lbs 900-999 lbs,000+ lbs Total (,000 head) (,000 head) (,000 head) (,000 head) (,000 head) (,000 head) (,000 head) (,000 head) 5 5 5 0 95 80 80 05 05 55 (X) 0 75 0 4,694 80 480 5 0 Other s... 5 0 78 468 United s.. Colorado... Kansas... Nebraska... Texas... 75 0 65 48 February 08 Under 600 lbs 600-699 lbs 700-799 lbs 800-899 lbs 900+ lbs 900-999 lbs,000+ lbs Total (,000 head) (,000 head) (,000 head) (,000 head) (,000 head) (,000 head) (,000 head) (,000 head) 0 0 5 5 70 75 80 55 90 05 5 55 (X) 5 70 5 5 85,068 65 40 4 65 Other s... 05 75 90 47 United s.. 5 5 Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations. (X) Not applicable. The 900 pounds and greater weight group is the sum of 900-999 pounds and,000 pounds and greater weight groups. 57 40 (X),87 of Cattle Marketed on,000+ Capacity Feedlots by Month s and United s: 07 and 08 Arizona... California... Colorado... Idaho... Iowa... Kansas... Minnesota... Nebraska... Oklahoma... South Dakota... Texas... Washington... February 07 January 08 February 08 previous month (,000 head) (,000 head) (,000 head) (percent) (percent) 7 49 65 5 89 70 9 40 0 6 60 85 4 07 45 4 465 4 4 75 4 4 5 70 6 06 80 0 5 0 0 89 04 0 0 9 0 05 98 06 9 9 85 9 06 99 87 4 88 0 85 88 Other s... 4 48 4 90 United s...,648,858,675 0 90 Cattle on Feed (March 08) 5

of Cattle Marketed on,000+ Capacity Feedlots United s Million head.0.9.8.7.6.5 07 08 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Other Disappearance on,000+ Capacity Feedlots by Month s and United s: 07 and 08 Arizona... California... Colorado... Idaho... Iowa... Kansas... Minnesota... Nebraska... Oklahoma... South Dakota... Texas... Washington... February 07 January 08 February 08 previous month (,000 head) (,000 head) (,000 head) (percent) (percent) 5 0 5 0 5 5 5 5 5 0 0 5 00 67 67 67 67 67 Other s... 4 4 4 United s... 56 69 57 0 8 6 Cattle on Feed (March 08)

Terms and Definitions of Cattle on Feed Estimates Cattle on feed are steers and heifers being fed a ration of grain, silage, hay and/or protein supplement for slaughter market that are expected to produce a carcass that will grade select or better. It excludes cattle being "backgrounded only" for later sale as feeders or later placement in another feedlot. Placements are steers and heifers put into a feedlot, fed a ration which will produce a carcass that will grade select or better, and are intended for the slaughter market. Marketings are steers and heifers shipped out of feedlots to a slaughter market. Other disappearance includes death loss, movement from feedlots to pasture, and shipments to other feedlots for further feeding. Statistical Methodology Survey Procedures: January and July all known feedlots in the United s with capacity of,000 or more head are surveyed to provide data for cattle on feed estimates. the other months, all known feedlots from 6 s are surveyed. The 6 s account for approximately 98 percent of the cattle on feed in feedlots with capacity of,000 or more head. Individual estimates are published monthly for of the 6 s. Data collected from the remaining 4 s are used to establish the Other s estimates. These 4 s include Illinois, New Mexico, Oregon, and Wyoming. The Other s category represents all cattle on feed with a capacity of,000 or more head for the rest of the United s. Estimating Procedures: These cattle on feed estimates were prepared by the Agricultural Statistics Board after reviewing recommendations and analysis submitted by Regional Field Offices. Regional and survey data were reviewed for reasonableness with each other and with estimates from the previous month when establishing the current estimates. Revision Policy: Revisions to previous estimates are made to improve month to month relationships. Estimates for the previous month are subject to revision in all s each month when current estimates are made. In February, all monthly estimates for the, and the number of feedlots and annual marketings from two years ago are reviewed and subject to revisions. The reviews are primarily based on slaughter data, state check-off or brand data, and any other data that may have been received after the original estimate was made. Estimates will also be reviewed after data from the Census of Agriculture are available. No revisions will be made after that date and estimates become final. Reliability: Since all,000+ capacity cattle on feed operators in every are not included in the monthly survey, survey estimates are subject to sampling variability. Survey results are also subject to non-sampling errors such as omissions, duplications, and mistakes in reporting, recording, and processing the data. The effects of these errors cannot be measured directly. They are minimized through rigid quality controls in the data collection process and through a careful review of all reported data for consistency and reasonableness. To assist users in evaluating the reliability of estimates in this report, the "Root Mean Square Error" is shown for selected items in the table on the following page. The "Root Mean Square Error" is a statistical measure based on past performance and is computed using the differences between first and latest estimates. The "Root Mean Square Error" for cattle on feed inventory estimates over the past 4 months is 0.0 percent. This means that chances are out of that the final estimate will not be above or below the current estimate of.7 million head by more than 0.0 percent. Chances are 9 out of 0 that the difference will not exceed 0. percent. The table on the following page shows a 4 month record of the range of differences between first and latest estimates for selected items. Using estimates of number on feed as an example, changes between the first estimate and the latest estimate during the past 4 months have averaged,000 head, ranging from 0 to 5,000 head. this period the initial estimate has been above the latest estimate time and has been below the latest estimate times. This does not imply that the initial estimate is likely to understate or overstate final inventory. Cattle on Feed (March 08) 7

Reliability of Monthly Cattle on Feed Estimates [Based on data for the past 4 months] Item on feed... Root mean square error 90 percent confidence level Difference between first and latest estimate Average Smallest Largest Below latest Months Above latest (percent) (percent) (,000) (,000) (,000) (number) (number) 0.0 0. 0 5 Placements... 0. 0.4 0 5 Marketings... 0. 0. 0 0 0 0 Information Contacts Listed below are the commodity specialists in the Livestock Branch of the National Agricultural Statistics Service to contact for additional information. E-mail inquiries may be sent to nass@nass.usda.gov. Travis Averill, Chief, Livestock Branch... (0) 70-570 Scott Hollis, Head, Livestock Section... (0) 690-44 Sherry Bertramsen Livestock Slaughter... (0) 70- Holly Brenize Sheep and Goats... (0) 70-0585 Donnie Fike Dairy Products... (0) 690-6 Heidi Gleich Cattle, Cattle on Feed... (0) 70-0 Mike Miller Milk Production and Milk Cows... (0) 70-78 Seth Riggins Hogs and Pigs... (0) 70-06 8 Cattle on Feed (March 08)

Access to NASS Reports For your convenience, you may access NASS reports and products the following ways: All reports are available electronically, at no cost, on the NASS web site: www.nass.usda.gov Both national and state specific reports are available via a free e-mail subscription. To set-up this free subscription, visit www.nass.usda.gov and click on National or in upper right corner above search box to create an account and select the reports you would like to receive. For more information on NASS surveys and reports, call the NASS Agricultural Statistics Hotline at (800) 77-95, 7:0 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. ET, or e-mail: nass@nass.usda.gov. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination against its customers, employees, and applicants for employment on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, sex, gender identity, religion, reprisal, and where applicable, political beliefs, marital status, familial or parental status, sexual orientation, or all or part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program, or protected genetic information in employment or in any program or activity conducted or funded by the Department. (Not all prohibited bases will apply to all programs and/or employment activities.) If you wish to file a Civil Rights program complaint of discrimination, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form (PDF), found online at www.ascr.usda.gov/filing-program-discrimination-complaint-usda-customer, or at any USDA office, or call (866) 6-999 to request the form. You may also write a letter containing all of the information requested in the form. Send your completed complaint form or letter to us by mail at U.S. Department of Agriculture, Director, Office of Adjudication, 0 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 0-9, by fax (0) 690-744 or email at program.intake@usda.gov.

USDA NASS Data Users Meeting Tuesday, April 4, 08 University of Chicago Gleacher Center 0 North Cityfront Plaza Drive Chicago, Illinois 606-464-8787 USDA s National Agricultural Statistics Service will hold an open forum for users of U.S. domestic and international agriculture data. NASS is organizing the 08 Data Users Meeting in cooperation with five other USDA agencies Agricultural Marketing Service, Economic Research Service, Farm Service Agency, Foreign Agricultural Service, and World Agricultural Outlook Board and the Census Bureau s Foreign Trade Division. Agency representatives will provide updates on recent and pending changes in statistical and information programs important to agriculture, answer questions, and welcome comments and input from data users. For registration details or additional information about the Data Users Meeting, see the meeting page on the NASS website (https://www.nass.usda.gov/education_and_outreach/meeting/index.php). Contact Tina Hall (NASS) at 0-70-896 or tina.hall@nass.usda.gov or Patricia Snipe (NASS) at 0-70-48 or patricia.snipe@nass.usda.gov for information. The Data Users Meeting precedes the Industry Outlook Conference at the same location on Wednesday, April 5, 08. The outlook meeting brings together analysts from various commodity sectors to discuss developments and trends. For registration details or additional information about the Industry Outlook Conference, see the conference page on the LMIC website (http://lmic.info/page/meetings) or contact James Robb at 0-76-99.