EXHIBIT C CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE

Similar documents
EXHIBIT B PROJECT OPERATION AND RESOURCE UTILIZATION

L e s s o n 1 INTRODUCTION TO HYDROELECTRIC POWER

PARR. PARR HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT PARR HYDRO DEVELOPMENT & FAIRFIELD PUMPED STORAGE FACILITY DEVELOPMENT FERC PROJECT No SC JANUARY 2013

John Hart Generating Station Replacement Project. January 2018 Community Construction Update Report #55

PARR HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT PARR HYDRO DEVELOPMENT & FAIRFIELD PUMPED STORAGE FACILITY DEVELOPMENT FERC PROJECT No SC SEPTEMBER 19, 2012

Annex V Concrete Structures Removal Plan

Northwest Power and Conservation Council

Working with BC Hydro. Capital Infrastructure Project Delivery

EMERGENCY STORAGE PROJECT San Vicente Pipeline and San Vicente Dam Raise Update Presentation Summary

John Hart Generating Station Replacement Project. November 2017 Community Construction Update Report #53

PROJECT BRIEF for the John Hart Generating Station Replacement Project

KANAWHA RIVER, WEST VIRGINIA

Rapid Hydropower Assessment Model Identify Hydroelectric Sites Using Geographic Information Systems

TOLEDO BEND PROJECT FERC NO FINAL LICENSE APPLICATION EXHIBIT B - PROJECT OPERATIONS AND RESOURCE UTILIZATION

134 FERC 61,195 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

Then the revolving speed of turbine is obtained as 300 r/min based on the specific speed of Ns 208 m-kw.

PEND OREILLE RIVER, WASHINGTON

SOUTH FORK AMERICAN RIVER (CHILI BAR), CALIFORNIA

Long Lake Small Hydro Project

2.16 NAM POT HYDROPOWER PROJECT

WEST ROSEBUD CREEK, MONTANA

Hydropower retrofitted onto existing water infrastructure assets

Lyon Creek Cedar Way Stormwater Detention Dam Operation and Maintenance Manual

Hydropower & Dams Services

Types of Hydropower Facilities

This is a digital document from the collections of the Wyoming Water Resources Data System (WRDS) Library.

Prospect No. 3 Hydroelectric Project FERC Project No. P-2337 Initial Study Report: Ramping May 2015

III. INVENTORY OF EXISTING FACILITIES

MEMORANDUM. The general findings of the assessment are as follows:

Dams. & Hydropower. Australia, New Zealand and the Pacific

LAURIE RIVER #1 GENERATING STATION SHORT-TERM EXTENSION LICENCE APPLICATION

Lower Mattagami River Project

Pipelines and Penstocks Avoiding operational issues throughout the life of your project

Campbell River System. Water Use Plan. Revised for Acceptance by the Comptroller of Water Rights

October 27, RE: Request for Qualifications for the Puu Opae Project. To Whom It May Concern,

Background Paper 81-7 REVIEW OF THE MARLETTE LAKE WATER SYSTEM AND PROPOSALS FOR SALE OF THE SYSTEM OR WATER FROM THE SYSTEM TO CARSON CITY

INVITATION OF BID (INTERNATIONAL COMPETITIVE BIDDING)

Hydropower in Minnesota's Future

Eska Creek Preliminary Feasibility Analysis

Green River Diversion Rehabilitation

MetroWest Water Supply Tunnel (604)

JOBS AROUND THE WORLD

Table of Contents. Table of Contents...1

DRAFT RECLAMATION MANUAL RELEASE Comments on this draft release must be submitted to Michael Pulskamp at by 5 PM on June 4, 2012.

FACT SHEET. 1/ The Recovery Act stipulates that Recovery Act funds for IWTF projects will not be cost shared.

CHAPTER 7 POWER PRODUCTION AND ENERGY CONSUMPTION

Water-Energy Nexus: Economics of Hydropower

SUMMARY OF 2010 WATER QUALITY MONITORING RESULTS WITHIN THE PRIEST RAPIDS HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT

Option 11. Divert Water from Miocene and Hendricks Canal to Supply the Ridge

Created by Simpo PDF Creator Pro (unregistered version) Asst.Prof.Dr. Jaafar S. Maatooq

Deep Tunnel, Shallow Pipe - How the City of Hamilton, OH plans to save millions on SSO control. Glenn Weist, P.E.

Appendix D - Evaluation of Interim Solutions

The Hoover Dam By Michael Stahl

Appraisal Evaluation of Columbia River Mainstem Off-Channel Storage Options

Presentation Outline. Review of CEATI Background Conventional Hydro Program Update

consulting engineers hydraulic steel structures

Report on the completion of HPP POBREG RAIFFEISEN BANK SH.A. ALBANIA. Evaluation and Business Plan Supervision of Hydropower Plants

SLIDES: Status of Southern Nevada Water Authority (SNWA): Third Intake into Lake Mead and Groundwater Project

Solar and Hydroelectric Power. By Abby Counihan, Ella Counihan, Deqa Mahammud, Paige Carlson, Fiona Kelliher

WORKING WITH BC HYDRO GENERATION 10 YEAR CAPITAL PLAN

Mill Pond Dam Modifications Feasibility Study

Commissioners Mital, Simpson, Helgeson, Manning, and Brown Mel Damewood, Engineering Manager; Mike McCann, Generation Manager

CLOSURE PLAN. CFR (b) Document No. GERS Stingy Run Flyash Pond. Gavin Plant Cheshire, Ohio. October, 2016

Sudbury to Hudson Transmission Reliability Project Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Buffalo River Hydroelectric Project

SEMINAR ON WATER SECURITY IN BULGARIA SOFIA, SEPTEMBER 18-19, 2017 DAM SAFETY IN ROMANIA

John Hart Generating Station Replacement Project. May 2017 Community Construction Update Report #47

SOUTHERN NEVADA WATER BRIEFING Prepared for the Legislative Commission's Subcommittee to Study Water

The Dalles East Fish Ladder Auxiliary Water System Emergency Operation Backup System Alternatives Columbia River, Oregon-Washington

WATER CONTROL MANUAL

ARTICLE 16 - WIND ENERGY CONVERSION FACILITIES

INTEGRATED RESOURCE PLANNING STUDY 2012 UPDATE

DTE Energy St. Clair Power Plant

SECTION IV. PIPELINE EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL

Hydropower Project License Summary PIT RIVER, CA PIT 1 HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT (P-2687) Pit River below Pit 1 Powerhouse

Review of the Colorado FERC Pilot Project and the Hydropower Regulatory Efficiency Act

PROJECT INFORMATION AND SHORTLISTING CRITERIA FOR SCREENING OF CONSULTING FIRM. Tamakoshi V Hydroelectric Project

today and offer the Department's views on S a measure to authorize tae construction of the Cibolo Project. The 'feasibility report has

Water Balance and Regulation Alternative Analysis for Kajakai Reservoir using HEC-ResSim

John Hart Generating Station Replacement Project. February 2018 Community Construction Update Report #56

Darial Energy LLC. Dariali Hydro Power Plant Construction and Operation Project. Environmental and Social Action Plan, Dariali HPP

This is a digital document from the collections of the Wyoming Water Resources Data System (WRDS) Library.

Regional Rusumo Falls Hydroelectric Project. Terms of Reference for the Project Manager

FAQ. Crown Hydro Frequently Asked Questions Page 1

Hydropower and Water Resources

3- Hydropower. Energy conversion and hydropower principles

Energy and Natural Resources

REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA Irrigation System Enhancement Project (P127759)

Silver Lake Hydropower Project FERC No PRE-FEASIBILITY STUDY REPORT

CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES LIST OF FIGURES

Aspen Revisited. By Alfred F.A. Patzig, HYDROPOWER TURBINE SYSTEMS INC. (HTS INC), Richmond, Virginia, USA

EMERGENCY STORAGE PROJECT

Supplemental Watershed Plan Agreement No. 10 for Neshaminy Creek Watershed Core Creek Dam (PA-620) Bucks County, Pennsylvania

Resources in the Amazon

Introduction. General Description

FACTS: Max Capacity Nant-y-Moch: million gallons. Nant-y-Moch Dam - Height: Nant-y-Moch Dam - Length: Dinas Dam - Height: Dinas Dam - Length:

Annex 5 - Hydropower Model Vakhsh

INITIAL CONSULTATION DOCUMENT

Notice of Intent to Prepare a Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Intake. Diversion Dam Fish Passage Project, Dawson County, Montana

Pasquia Area Drainage and Pumping System

Transcription:

EXHIBIT C CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE C.1 CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE A preliminary construction schedule as shown in Figure C-1 has been developed for the to show the sequencing of principal activities through the engineering design and construction process. The schedule assumes that the FERC license application is accepted in early 2009 and that the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) is completed in about one year (by spring 2010). Based on these assumptions, the four-year-long schedule shows a traditional design-bid-build approach. However depending on project financing needs and conditions in construction markets, The District may choose to construct the Project under a design-build approach which would somewhat condense the design and construction processes. The construction schedule shows the planned phasing of engineering design and construction activities relative to the seasonal weather and river conditions at the Enloe site. Engineering design will take about 10 months and will include some supplementary investigations to assist in final site design. Preparation of bid documents, solicitation of bids from equipment vendors and construction contractors and negotiation of contracts is estimated to take a further nine months. Procurement, manufacture and delivery of the two-unit water-to-wire turbine/generator package is expected to take 12 months with shorter periods for other smaller packages for gates, hoists, penstock cans, transformers, switchgear etc. which would be sequenced to suit construction plans. Construction of power facilities would take 12 months followed by six weeks of commissioning prior to start of commercial operation in the Spring. Installation of the crest gates would be carried out during the subsequent Fall since the new powerplant would be used to draw down the reservoir below the crest of the spillway. FERC Project # 12569 C-1 November 2007

ACTIVITY YEAR 20101 YEAR 20112 YEAR 20123 YEAR 2013 4 J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D DESIGN & BID DOCUMENTS Design Supplemental Site Investigations Bid documents Bid Equipment Packages Bid Construction PROCUREMENT Turbine/Generator Package Gates, Trashracks, hoists Crest gates Penstock Transformers/switchgear CONSTRUCTION Mobilization Access road improvements Cofferdam Site excavation Training Wall Penstock Intake Penstock Intake canal River Intake Approach Channel Tailrace Channel Powerhouse Foundation preparation Concrete substructure Turbine/Generator embedded parts Powerhouse Structure Turbine/Generator Installation Electrical mechanical services Transmission/substation COMMISSIONING COMMERCIAL OPERATION Crest gates Figure C-1: Enloe Project Preliminary Construction Schedule FERC Project # 12569 C-2 November 2007

C.2 COMMERCIAL OPERATION DATE For planning purposes, the date for commercial operation is approximately April 15 th of 2013 of the design and construction process. C.3 EXISTING FACILITIES No portion of the proposed consists of previously constructed, unlicensed water power structures or facilities. Another project at the Enloe Dam previously operated under a license granted by the Federal Power Commission, ceasing operations in 1958. A brief chronology of the Project s history follows. The Federal Power Commission (FPC) issued an order licensing Project No. 2062 on June 26, 1956. The previously operated under a Department of Interior Power Permit issued in 1918 to Okanogan Valley Power Company, which was transferred to Washington Water Power in 1929 and to Public Utility District No. 1 of Okanogan County (The District) in 1945 (FPC Order Issuing License Project No. 2062, June 26, 1956). HISTORY OF PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND OWNERSHIP A detailed description of the hydroelectric development at the Enloe Hydroelectric Project site and of the ownership of facilities prior to the District is provided in the Historical American Engineering Record (see Appendix E.4.1). EARLY PROJECTS The is located on the Similkameen River about 3.5 miles northwest of the City of Oroville, in north-central Washington State, near the Canadian border. The history of hydropower development at this site, just upstream of Similkameen Falls on the lower Similkameen River, spans the past century. According to the HAER (Appendix E.4.1), the earliest known power production on the Similkameen River occurred when an elderly German settler named Kruger placed a small waterwheel on a shaft and lowered it into the Similkameen River (Vissia 1974:8:2). The exact location of the waterwheel and powerhouse has been lost to time. This first powerhouse with its small generator furnished electricity for the mining town of Golden six miles to the south. The first hydroelectric power plant, a run-of-river project, was built at Similkameen Falls by the Similkameen Power Company, organized by J.M. Hagerty in 1902. Hagerty secured land and water rights at the site and spent the next three years developing the project until his death in 1905. Hagerty started construction on a wooden crib dam above the Similkameen Falls to divert water to the powerhouse below the falls. The wooden dam and powerhouse were completed in 1906, about a year after his death. FERC Project # 12569 C-3 November 2007

The plant supplied power and light to the towns of Oroville and Nighthawk, as well as local irrigation. The dam had contracts with the Owasco and Ivanhoe mines, where electric power was to be used in driving a 4,000-foot tunnel (Hallauer 1979). The Ruby and Caaba mine was also supplied with power, as was the Wannacut Lake mining camp of Golden. The plant was leased to J.L. Harper and his associates, of Republic, Washington, in June, 1910. Operating under the name of North Washington Power Company, the consortium signed a ten-year lease obligating the Company to put a power line from Oroville to service Republic mines and mills. In October of the same year the Company announced plans to add 950 horsepower to the Hagerty powerhouse (Oroville Weekly Gazette 2 September 1910:1). It appears that the North Washington Power Company failed to accomplish either of its envisioned plans as in 1913 executors of the Hagerty estate moved to cancel the lease for failure to perform and listed the property for sale (Oroville Weekly Gazette 14 March 1913:1). In 1915, the Okanogan Water Company, a subsidiary of the Washington Water Power Company of Spokane, contested the water rights of the Similkameen Power Company. The West Okanogan Valley Irrigation District opposed the claims of both power companies, seeking the opportunity to develop power in connection with its irrigation system (Oroville Weekly Gazette 29 October 1915:1). Bo Sweeney, Assistant Secretary of the Department of the Interior, awarded the title of rightful claimant to the water power in the Similkameen River to the Similkameen Power Company. ENLOE ERA Eugene Enloe incorporated the Okanogan Valley Power Company (OVPC) under the laws of the State of Washington in 1913. In 1916, the OVPC bought the complete holdings of the Similkameen Power Company, including the powerhouse and all related machinery, and the power lines and substations that serviced the mines. Construction of the arch-gravity dam appears to have begun in 1919 and was completed in the summer of 1920, as evidenced by the inscription stamped on the west abutment of the dam. The Project itself, however, was not completed for three more years, in 1923 (FPC Order Issuing License Project No. 2062, June 26, 1956). The Project served the mining community of Nighthawk upstream, and the crossroads town of Oroville downstream. In July of 1922 Enloe Dam drew the attention of large power companies. Washington Water Power (WWP) had already extended a power line into Grant County early in 1922 (Oroville Weekly Gazette 21 July 1922:1). That year WWP approached Eugene Enloe, expressing interest in acquiring the facility. On January 1, 1923, Enloe sold the property to Washington Water Power. WWP then installed a second penstock from the dam and a second generating unit in the powerhouse (Oroville Weekly Gazette 11 May 1923:1). The Company also constructed cottages (since removed) near the east abutment of the dam to house operators of the facility. FERC Project # 12569 C-4 November 2007

WWP continued to operate until 1945, when Public Utility District No. 1 of Okanogan County acquired the property. The District acquired the hydropower project on May 11, 1945 (FPC Order Issuing License Project No. 2062, June 26, 1956), and has owned it since. The District ceased operation of the power generators on 29 July 1958 when the extension of Bonneville Power Administration's high-voltage transmission line into the Okanogan Valley provided a less expensive source of power. Operation of Enloe Dam became unprofitable, and the facilities were abandoned. Operation was discontinued because the generating equipment had become obsolete and repair or modernization of the power facilities was not economically feasible. One of the penstocks, which had largely collapsed, was sold for salvage. HISTORICAL AND REMAINING PROJECT FACILITIES A detailed description of the original facilities is provided in the Historical American Engineering Record (Appendix E.4.1). Initially a 1,600 kw unit was installed, followed by the addition of a second 1,600 kw unit in 1924. The Project as licensed in 1956 was described as follows (FPC Order Issuing License Project No. 2062, June 26, 1956): Principal structures consisting of: a concrete arch dam approximately 54 feet high and 340 feet long forming a reservoir with area of about 85 acres at spillway level and useful storage capacity of 212 acre-feet with a 2.5 foot drawdown; two woodstave pipe lines approximately 700 feet long; a powerhouse containing two 2,500-horsepower turbines and two 1,600 kilowatt generators; transformers; switching equipment; a 33-kilovolt transmission live from the Oroville power plant to Tonasket substation; a step-up substation at the Oroville plant; and appurtenant facilities The original water conveyance structures, surge tanks, and powerhouse remain on the site, but are no longer functional. One of the two woodstave pipelines still remains in place, running from the dam about 800 feet downstream to two large steel surge tanks that fed water to the turbines and generators in the powerhouse. The powerhouse itself is in poor condition; it has extensively deteriorated and has been vandalized. The generating units, together with most copper and smaller electrical equipment were removed from the Project site long ago. A suspension bridge which provided footaccess across the river to the powerhouse also has been removed; as has the railroad on the west side of the river which provided freight access to the powerhouse (however single lane vehicle access is available along the old railroad grade). Enloe Dam, however, remains a viable structure. The dam is a 54-foot high, 315-foot long concrete gravity arch structure designed to act as an overfall spillway. The spillway crest length is 276 feet. Enloe Dam impounds a small reservoir approximately two miles long by 250 feet wide, with an average depth of 8.4 feet at the existing dam crest elevation of 1044.3 feet. It is estimated that the original approximately 1,600 acre-feet FERC Project # 12569 C-5 November 2007

reservoir has been reduced to about 570 acre-feet of water storage capacity (with water at the existing dam crest height) by the accumulation of sediment. FERC Project # 12569 C-6 November 2007