Wastewater Characterisation and Treatment

Similar documents
WASTEWATER TREATMENT

Wastewater Pollutants & Treatment Processes. Dr. Deniz AKGÜL Marmara University Department of Environmental Engineering

Sanitary Sewer Systems. Sewage Collection System. Types of Sewage 10/12/2016. General Overview

Wastewater Treatment Processes

Module 22 : Sludge Management

Anaerobic Degradation of Organics

Wastewater Management in Developing Countries. Dr. Mushtaq Ahmed Memon Programme Officer, UNEP IETC

Wastewater Treatment Processes

Application of the AGF (Anoxic Gas Flotation) Process

Wastewater Treatment Works... The Basics

Domestic Waste Water (Sewage): Collection, Treatment & Disposal

STRUCTURAL AND OPERATIONAL STUDY OF 339 MLD SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT AT AMBERPET

WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM

MARPAK modular biomedia WASTEWATER TREATMENT

WASTE WATER T*R*E*A*T*M*E*N*T T*E*C*H*N*O*L*O*G*I.E

Utilizing algal oxygen production for advanced wastewater treatment in a Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor (MBBR) the Biologically Aerated Reactor (BAR )

OPERATION AND MANAGEMENT OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS

Advanced Onsite Wastewater Treatment Overview

DISCUSSION PAPER. 1 Objective. 2 Design Flows and Loads. Capital Regional District Core Area Wastewater Management Program

BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHOROUS REMOVAL AN OPERATOR S GUIDE

Unit Treatment Processes in Water and Wastewater Engineering

Water Pollution. Objective: Name, describe, and cite examples of the eight major types of water pollution.

Lagoons Operation and Management in New Brunswick

American Water College 2010

CTB3365x Introduction to Water Treatment

JEDDAH INDUSTRIAL CITY

ANAEROBIC TREATMENT OF PAPER MILL WASTEWATER

Wastewater Treatment Technology and Applications in Industrial Facilities

ENHANCING THE PERFORMANCE OF OXIDATION DITCHES. Larry W. Moore, Ph.D., P.E., DEE Professor of Environmental Engineering The University of Memphis

Improving Septic Tank Performance by Enhancing Anaerobic Digestion NOWRA Onsite Wastewater Mega-Conference

W O C H H O L Z R E G I O N A L W A T E R R E C L A M A T I O N F A C I L I T Y O V E R V I E W

Proposal by Russia to delete hot sub-spot Hot sub-spot name South-West Wastewater Treatment Plant

The Fate of Ammonia in Facultative Lagoon Sludge Treatment Processes: An Investigation of Methods for Reducing Ammonia in Recycle Streams:

Preparing for Nutrient Removal at Your Treatment Plant

COMPARISON OF SBR AND CONTINUOUS FLOW ACTIVATED SLUDGE FOR NUTRIENT REMOVAL

Sulaibiya world s largest membrane water reuse project

Advantages & Applications of MBBR Technologies

TWO YEARS OF BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL WITH AN ADVANCED MSBR SYSTEM AT THE SHENZHEN YANTIAN WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

A. Typically, sewage treatment involves three stages, called (a) primary, (b) secondary and (c) tertiary treatment:

CIE4485 Wastewater Treatment

Module 20: Trickling Filters Answer Key

COMPARISON STUDY BETWEEN INTEGRATED FIXED FILM ACTIVATED SLUDGE (IFAS), MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR (MBR) AND CONVENTIONAL ACTIVATED SLUDGE (AS) PROCESSES

Donner Summit PUD Interactive Map Pop-up Text and Photos June 30, 2015

Reclaimed Waste Water for Power Plant Cooling Tower Water & Boiler Feed Make-up. Richard Coniglio, Business Product Manager

Aerobic Treatment Units

Biological Wastewater Treatment Processes II: MBBR Processes

Case History: Anaerobic and Aerobic Treatment of Textile Wastes at South Carolina Textile Plants. Introduction

A Hybrid Constructed Wetland System for Decentralized Wastewater Treatment

MBBR Wastewater Treatment Processes

BEING GOOD STEWARDS: IMPROVING EFFLUENT QUALITY ON A BARRIER ISLAND. 1.0 Executive Summary

New Methods of Textile waste water treatment. Leture 37

Prepared by the Operation of Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plants Task Force of the Water Environment Federation

INTRODUCTION OF THE IC REACTOR IN THE PAPER INDUSTRY

Environmental Biotechnology Cooperative Research Centre Date submitted: March 2008 Date published: March 2011

Attached Growth Biological Systems

by M k h GROVER Degremont

Triplepoint Environmental

TWO YEAR CASE STUDY OF INTEGRATED FIXED FILM ACTIVATED SLUDGE (IFAS) AT BROOMFIELD, CO WWTP West 124th Street Broomfield, CO 80020

Use of Biowin for Process Troubleshooting / Design for a Unique Wastewater

COD REMOVAL OF CARDBOARD FACTORY WASTEWATER BY UPFLOW ANAEROBIC FILTER

A Roadmap for Smarter Nutrient Management in a Carbon and Energy Constrained World. Samuel Jeyanayagam, PhD, PE, BCEE

Anaerobic Digestion of Wastewater Treatment Plant Biosolids (Sludge)

SOLUTIONS AND EQUIPMENT FOR LEACHATE TREATMENT

NEW BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL CONCEPT SUCCESSFULLY APPLIED IN A T-DITCH PROCESS WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

CE421/521 Environmental Biotechnology. Nitrogen and Phosphorus Cycles Lecture Tim Ellis

Sanitary and Environmental Engineering I (4 th Year Civil)

Water Technologies. The AGAR Process: Make Your Plant Bigger Without Making it Bigger

Chapter ANAEROBIC TREATMENT BY METHANOGENESIS

General Operational Considerations in Nutrient and Wet Weather Flow Management for Wastewater Treatment Facilities Part II

KEY WORDS Anaerobic lagoons ; reaction constant ; operation ; per capita sludge ; loading rate.

Constructed Wetlands

Characteristics of Nutrient Removal in Vertical Membrane Bioreactors

WASTEWATER TREATMENT. Lili sugiyarto

Anaerobic Reactor Technologies

Biological Phosphorus Removal Technology. Presented by: Eugene Laschinger, P.E.

AquaPASS. Aqua MixAir System. Phase Separator. System Features and Advantages. Anaerobic. Staged Aeration. Pre-Anoxic.

Biothane Anaerobic Technology Memthane 2.0 WATER TECHNOLOGIES

Inlet Process air and wash cycle scour air. Air grid Floor Nozzle

General Information on Nitrogen

Deliverable Report of processes specifications anaerobic waste water purification process of mechanical pulping production

Water and Wastewater Engineering Dr. Ligy Philip Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Madras

Module 19 : Aerobic Secondary Treatment Of Wastewater. Lecture 24 : Aerobic Secondary Treatment Of Wastewater

Fixed-Film Processes

Waste Management for Food & Agriculture Industry Cleaner Production for Food industries

WASTEWATER 101 Fo r MOWA

Center Sanitation District

IMPROVED BIO-TOWER TECHNOLOGY MUNICIPAL SEWAGE TREATMENT

Choices to Address Filamentous Growth

Evaluation of Conventional Activated Sludge Compared to Membrane Bioreactors

Water and Environmental Engineering, Department of Chemical Engineering, Lund University

Zero Discharge for Textile Industry

WASTEWATER TREATMENT. Nelson Environmental Inc. Nelson Environmental Inc.

Wastewater Treatment Design of Waste Stabilization Ponds

Innovations in Nitrogen and Phosphorus Removal

Lowering The Total Cost Of Operation

Outline. Municipal Wastewater Engineering. Advanced wastewater treatment. Advanced wastewater treatment. Advanced wastewater treatment

Trickling Filters and Rotary Biological Contactors

International Society of Beverage Technologists Beverage Production Seminar January 24-27, 2000 Wastewater Minimization and Treatment

Appendix D JWPCP Background and NDN

Copies: Mark Hildebrand (NCA) ARCADIS Project No.: April 10, Task A 3100

Transcription:

Wastewater Characterisation and Treatment Recommended text books: Wastewater Engineering Metcalf and Eddy Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater Contact: Benoit Guieysse B.J.Guieysse@massey.ac.nz RC.2.18 Lecture block outline Characterisation Physical pollutants Chemical pollutants Bio pollutants Sampling Treatment Primary Secondary Tertiary Disposal The big picture: Understanding the nature of wastewater is essential in the design and operation of collection, treatment, and reuse facilities and in the engineering management of environmental quality We need to know what s in it before we can decide what to do with it! 1

10. Wastewater Treatment Example: City of Toronto, Canada Typical steps in wastewater treatment: from the most cost-efficient to the least! Removal SS (include some COD) Removal BOD/COD & nutrients Removal nutrient & pathogens Preliminary treatment Primary treatment Secondary treatment Tertiary treatment Removal large debris, grease Equalization Sludge treatment Typically: Preliminary and Primary treatments are based on physical mechanisms Secondary = biological Tertiary = specialized Sludge digestion, stabilization & dewatering 2

Common processes for pollutant removal Pollutants Common Processes Debris, large solids Grid removal Suspended solids (including VSS) Sedimentation FOGDissolved Air Flotation Dissolved solids Coagulation-Flocculation Organic pollutants* Biological treatment N Biological nitrification-denitrification P Chemical precipitation Priority pollutants** Adsorption Pathogens** Biological treatment (maturation ponds) and specific treatment (UV irradiation, chlorination) * A fraction of organic pollutants found as suspended solids will be removed with solids. ** A fraction of priority pollutants and pathogen can be indirectly removed with solids. Membrane filtration (from ultra- to nano-filtration and reverse osmosis) are gaining popularity in situations where reuse is necessary or space seriously limited. Membrane bioreactors combine size separation with biological removal. PRELIMINARY PRIMARY Waste water Screening Grit removal Flow balancing (optional) Dissolved air flotation Sedimentation Solids Landfill Sludge SECONDARY AEROBIC Suspended culture Attached culture ANAEROBIC Suspended culture Anaerobic lagoon UASB Contact process Attached growth Anaerobic filter Sludge SLUDGE THICKENING/ DEWATERING TERTIARY Specialised Processes SLUDGE TREATMENT DISPOSAL / REUSE DISPOSAL / REUSE 3

Important definitions Pollutant loading rate = amount of pollutant reaching a tank/process per unit of time usually kg/d Example: A wastewater containing 100 g COD/m 3 and 250 g TS/m 3 is treated in a pond. The wastewater flow rate is 300 m 3 /d. The organic loading rate = 100 300 = 30,000 g COD/d = 30 kg COD/d. Similarly, the solid loading rate = 75 kg TS/d. Hydraulic Residence Time (HRT) = amount of time a liquid volume introduced into a tank/process will stay inside the tank/process before being removed Solid Retention Time (SRT) = amount of time a solid would remain in the system. Pollutant loading rates and the retention times are important design criteria during WWT. Preliminary & Primary Treatment Objectives: Balancing of flows, screening/settling and fat removal. Crucial steps that reduce the pollutant load to the rest of the facility. Offer best value for $$ 4

Examples large debris removal Flow / organic loading Need for equalization Typical daily variation of municipal wastewater: water use peaks during morning and evening are seen with a 1-2 hours delay at the WWT 0 6 12 18 24 hours Flow / organic loading Typical yearly variation of municipal wastewater in South France: Winter peaks reflect storms and summer peaks reflect the increase of population (up to 100 times)! 1 3 6 9 12 Month 5

Balancing and storage Tank or pond used to store wastewater Reduce impact of changes in wastewater flow-rate and strength Adjust ph if needed Storage capacity in case of breakdown Useful if wastewater is used for irrigation Fat removal Dissolved Air Flotation http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/file:daf_unit.png 6

Primary treatment Physical separation of solids from the wastewater by sedimentation Examples 7

Secondary treatment All most all wastewaters containing biodegradable constituents can be treated biologically. You must understand the processes to ensure the proper conditions are produced/controlled effectively. Main processes for Secondary treatment Activated Sludge Aerobic ponds Aerobic suspended Aerobic attached Trickling filter Rotative disks Anaerobic pond Anaerobic suspended Anaerobic attached UASB + multitude of hybrid (anaerobic/aerobic or suspended/attached), anoxic (e.g. NO 3- instead of O 2 ) processes in various combinations. Process can also be classified as batch/continuous etc 8

Main principle of biological removal: Food + organisms = Products + biomass Carbon source (organic compounds) Nutrient sources: N, P, H, O etc Energy source (Organic and inorganic compounds) Electron acceptor: O 2, NO 3-, CO 2 etc Cell Products: CH 4, oil, NO 3-, N 2, NO 2-, CO 2, O 2, heat, enzymes, toxins etc More cells (containing C, N, and P) Aerobic Carbon removal Organics compounds are used as sources of carbon and energy C 10 H 19 O 3 N + O 2 + N + P C 5 H 7 NO 2 + CO 2 + H 2 O + NH 4+... Symbolize organic matter in WW = pollutant. In fact, WW is made up of 1000s of different compounds Nutrients Biomass that must also be removed (sludge). Note the biomass contains N and P and can be itself considered as organic pollutant Anaerobic carbon removal Organics Biomass + CO 2 + CH 4 + NH 4 + Organic pollutants are converted into methane (energy), CO 2 and biomass (sludge) These reactions summarize far more complex mechanisms! 9

Anoxic carbon removal Anoxic treatment often means that oxygen is absent and replaced by nitrate of sulfate. Nitrate instead of oxygen: C 10 H 19 O 3 N + NO 3- + nutrients C 5 H 7 NO 2 + CO 2 + N 2 +... This process is also known as denitrification (see N-removal) Sulfate instead of oxygen: C 10 H 19 O 3 N + SO 2-4 + nutrients C 5 H 7 NO 2 + CO 2 + H 2 S +... H 2 S formation results in bad smells N-Removal As seen above, biomass is made of C, N and P (C 5 H 7 NO 2 ). N and P are therefore removed by assimilation = uptake into cells during population growth. This is the main mechanism for N and P removal in ponds Biological nitrogen removal is based on the conversion of N (organic or inorganic) into N 2 that escapes into the atmosphere. This is a 2-step process: 1. Nitrification (AEROBIC conditions) conversion of NH 4+ to NO 3 - NH 4+ + CO 2 + O 2 biomass + NO 3 -. 2. Followed by denitrification (ANOXIC) - conversion of NO 3- to N 2 C 10 H 19 O 3 N + NO 3- biomass + N 2 + CO 2 10

Phosphorus Removal Bio-P removal: relatively new (and unreliable) technology Special organisms take up more P than is required for growth More traditional approach is P removal by precipitation Impact of N and P on NZ freshwater: http://www.mfe.govt.nz/environmental-reporting/freshwater/river/nutrients/ The Activated Sludge process Reactor micro-organisms are kept in suspension as flocks Liquid/solids separator usually a sedimentation tank Recycle stream for maintaining adequate biomass conc. 11

Trickling Filters The filter is a non-submerged, fixed film reactor using rock or plastic packing (almost all new filters are constructed with plastic packing). The wastewater is evenly distributed over the top of the bed by a rotary distributor The mircro-organisms grow on the packing. Treatment occurs as the wastewater flows over the film. Anaerobic treatment Advantages Less energy required (no need for forced aeration) Less biological sludge production Fewer nutrients required CH 4 production energy source Elimination of off-gas air pollution (no forced aeration) Disadvantages Longer start-up time May require alkalinity addition May require polishing Bio N and P removal is not possible Much more sensitive to lower temps Potential for production of odours Potential for production of corrosive gases 12

UASB (upflow anaerobic sludge blanket) Rely on granulation which enables very high sludge concentrations to accumulate at the base of the reactor. Liquid and gas flow suspend granules. Baffles retains bacterial granules, separate gas/liquid. HRT of 0.5-1 d Wastewater Ponds (Lagoons) This is the more low-tech of WWT reactors: usually an earthen basin, which might be covered with an impermeable liner. Very common for small communities or as maturation ponds (tertiary treatment) Normally in series 2/3 ponds New Zealand: 200 USA: 3,500+ France: 2,500+ 26 13

Disadvantages Advantages Why ponds? Large land area needed Temperature effect Process modification and control difficult High SS in effluent Ready equalisation Low maintenance Primary/secondary/ tertiary Easy operation 27 Types of ponds Anaerobic Facultative aerobic Maturation (Aerobic pond) Surface aerated 28 14

Anaerobic ponds 2-5m depth, no algae, HRT of 20-50 d Relatively small with a high organic load 125-300 kg BOD/ha-day. 40-70% BOD removal. Problem with methane release in the atmosphere (unless the pond is covered and methane is burned). 29 Facultative ponds Treatment mechanisms in a facultative pond (Source: Wastewater Engineering by Metcalf & Eddy, 1991, pg 437) 15

Facultative ponds Example of design criteria: 10-350 kg BOD/ha day, 1.0-2m depth, 17-200 d HRT (for temperate-subtropical weather, 10-350 kg BOD/ha day, 1.5-2m depth, 33-100 d HRT) 90% BOD removal The algae provide oxygen and capture CO 2 during photosynthesis. CO 2 capture can cause the ph to increase, which improves pathogen kills, N stripping and P precipitation 31 Maturation ponds (aerobic lagoons) Look like facultative, 1-1.5m deep Low organic loading well oxygenated 32 16

Aerated pond typically, mechanical aeration on floats or fixed platforms earthen basin Lagoon depth: 1 3m Similar as a facultative ponds with the upper layer is aerated with surface aerators in order to avoid odor formation! Aeration is often intermittent (during night) 5-25 days retention times 10 g BOD/m 3 -d Irrigation Salinity: related to electrical conductivity (can use TDS as a measure) Nutrients: provide fertilizer (phosphorus is often bound in the soil but nitrogen can leach quite readily). Fats and biological growth can cause the blocking of sprinkler systems; an issue for using WW for irrigation. Discharge areas should be rotated (approx every 20 days) to allow organic and nutrient conversion 17

Sludge disposal Sludge = wastes from screens, primarily clarifiers and biosolids from bioreactors Disposal: land application, landfills, incineration Sludge processing: key process is thickening helps transportation, digestion, drying and combustion Sludge can often be digested anaerobically (more common) or aerobically. Digested sludge can be composted for further stabilization (pathogen removal). Plant Performance Criteria Activated Sludge Plant Biological filter Comparison Aerated Lagoon Waste stabilization pond BOD Removal F F GG Pathogen removal P P GG SS Removal GGF F Economic Factors Simple & economic construction P P F G Simple operation P F P G Land Requirement GGF P Maintenance cost P F P G Energy Demand P F P G Sludge Removal costs F F F G G = Good - F = Fair - P = Poor 18

General overview Process Applications Advantages Disadvantages Cost Activated sludge Low/moderate conc. Proven, good control Emissions of volatile compounds and aerosols, high sludge production. Aeration costs +++ Aerated lagoons / ponds Trickling filter Low conc. Simple, low costs Emissions of volatile compounds and aerosols, sensitive to shock and climate, land requirment, no control Low conc., recalcitrant organics Little sludge, biodiverse Emissions of volatile compounds, sensitive to shocks, clogging, odor + + Anaerobic process High-strength Methane production, low sludge Sensitive to temperature, higher capital costs, odor ++ Source: Environmental Biotreatment. CN Mulligan. This is given as an example only, very specific of North America Conclusions Most large wastewater treatment systems are based on activated sludge variations as secondary treatment because this is the best described process. The trickling filter is used but there are some operational problems (clogging). Anaerobic technologies are generally recommended for effluents with high concentrations of biodegradable organic matter. There are therefore very commonly used for sludge digestion. They remain limited by odor and instability issues (temperature, toxicity). Ponds are common for primary and secondary treatment at small scales (decentralized treatment) or for tertiary treatment as stabilization ponds. 19

Example Case study: treating dairy wastewaters Characteristic Concentration Biochemical oxygen demand 90-12,400 (mg/l) Chemical oxygen demand 180-23,000 (mg/l) Suspended solids 7-7,200 (mg/l) Nitrogen 1 70 (mg/l) Fat 0 2100 (mg/l) Phosphorus (as PO 4 ) 4-150 (mg/l) ph 3 13 Temperature 11 72 ( o C) Remember wastewater properties can change in with time and location! 20

Dairy wastewater Approx 14.7 billions litres milk produced in NZ each year (2005/06) Wastewater produced: 0.5 2 m 3 wastewater per m 3 milk received This accounts for 7 29 billion litres of wastewater produced from milk production only! Treatment options Characteristic Concentration BOD 90-12,400 (mg/l) COD 180-23,000 (mg/l) SS 7-7,200 (mg/l) N 1 70 (mg/l) Fat 0 2100 (mg/l) P (as PO 4- ) 4-150 (mg/l) ph 3 13 Temperature 11 72 ( o C) High BOD and COD values + good BOD/COD ratio = plenty of biodegradable organic matter = excellent for anaerobic treatment! Low concentrations of suspended solids = primary settling might not be efficient A balance tank would be useful (neutralize ph and temperature) and primary settling would help reduce the suspended solids. Fat removal is often necessary 21