TRENDS IN U.S. THERMOELECTRIC POWER. WATER/ENERGY SUSTAINABILITY SYMPOSIUM WATER & ENERGY POLICY IN THE 21 ST CENTURY September 13 16, 2009

Similar documents
Investigation of the Coastal Lowlands Aquifer System

Water Use in the Tennessee Valley for 2015 and Projected Use in 2040

U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Florida Water-Use Program

Nuclear Power Generation: Water Needs and Environmental Impacts

Electricity Generation and Water- Related Constraints: An Empirical Analysis of Four Southeastern States

Use of Water in New Mexico analyzed by county

The Future of Renewable Energy and Other Energy. By Peter Barth CH2M HILL Pittsburgh, PA

Past and Future Freshwater Use in the United States

Confronting Uncertainties in Biofuel Water Landscape: Assessment and Attributes

Water Supply Planning in North Carolina. Water / Wastewater Infrastructure Study Commission December 14, 2009

Study: Gallatin Coal Plant

Water and Energy Nexus: Strategic Thinking Water + Energy in Changing Climates, 2010 Ground Water Protection Council

Water Issues Relating to Unconventional Oil and Gas Production

The Springs and. Aquifer System of Florida. Debra Segal, M.S. Volunteer for the Howard T. Odum Florida Springs Institute. Rock Springs, Orange County

The energy sector is comprised of mining and power generation.

2009 GWPC Water/Energy Sustainability Symposium Salt Lake City, UT DOE/NETL s Energy-Water RD&D Program

Atlases of Water Rights by Type and by Use

Permitting of Wastewater Discharges from Biodiesel Production Facilities in Colorado

Water Availability and Use - Program 55

The Peace Watershed. Current and Future Water Use and Issues, 2011

Energy s Water Demand: Trends, Vulnerabilities, and Management

WATER USE BENCHMARKS FOR THERMOELECTRIC POWER GENERATION

Water Use and Conservation in Manufacturing: Evidence from U.S. Microdata. Randy A. Becker Center for Economic Studies U.S.

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS: Point Pleasant Pumping Station. 1. Q: Why does PE need water from the Delaware at Point Pleasant?

RE: Industrial Surface Water Withdrawal Permit No Vogtle Electric Generating Plant Units 3 and 4, Burke County, Georgia

Water Use, Electric Power, and Nuclear Energy: Environmental Stewardship. William Skaff Nuclear Energy Institute September 15, 2009

Water and Wisconsin Agriculture: Reducing Withdrawals and Increasing Efficiency

PANAMA CANAL RESERVOIR WATER QUALITY EVALUATION STUDY

WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR UNCONVENTIONAL GAS WELL DEVELOPMENT

TECHNICAL EVALUATION OF OPTIONS FOR LONG-TERM AUGMENTATION OF THE COLORADO RIVER SYSTEM

Colorado River Challenges Impacts to Southern Arizona

Analysis of Water Consumption in the Major Steps of Bioethanol Production

Issue paper: Aquifer Water Balance

NGWA INFORMATION BRIEF

Water Quality and Quantity Impacts from Proposed South Texas Plant Expansion

CITY OF HOYT LAKES, MINNESOTA SOURCE WATER ASSESSMENT

Groundwater Resources Program Regional Groundwater Evaluation

Water Demand Scenarios for NE Illinois Study Area

Issues with petroleum

Recent Developments in Water Withdrawal Management

An Examination of Future Power Generation Scenarios and Water Resource Impacts Great Lakes Energy-Water Nexus Initiative

Dynamic Statewide Water Budget for Water Planning in New Mexico

Department of Defense Industrial, Landscaping, and Agricultural (ILA) Water Use Guidance

Water Pollution. Environmental Science

Michigan Department of Environmental Quality

SEWRPC Staff Memorandum RESPONSE TO REQUESTS BY THE CITY OF NEW BERLIN TO DELINEATE THE 20-YEAR PLANNED WATER SUPPLY SERVICE AREA FOR THE UTILITY

Implementing the Irrigation Reporting Portion of the Illinois Water Use Act

Importance of Groundwater to the US Economy

Domestic Self-Supply and Private Landscape Irrigation Wells

Leveraging Energy Efficiency to Deliver Water Savings. Kathleen Hogan Climate Protection Partnerships Division US EPA

Alabama s Water- Agriculture Nexus Water Resource Management and Economics Conference October 23, 2014

Resiliency and the Energy-Water Nexus

INSTRUCTIONS FOR FILING A WATER ALLOCATION PERMIT APPLICATION

Output s. Inputs Categories Amount Renewable? Raw. Re- Ne wa ble. Categories (Non-hazardous? Hazardous?) A mo unt. Ra w Gr Sc. Green.

ASSIMILATIVE CAPACITY MODELING USING INTEGRATED WATERSHED AND LAKE MODELS IN SUPPORT OF THE GEORGIA COMPREHENSIVE STATEWIDE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN

Updated State-level Greenhouse Gas Emission Coefficients for Electricity Generation

Strategies for Phosphorus Management on Cropland. Renee Hancock, NE NRCS State Water Quality Specialist

Overview of the Bureau of Reclamation. Michael L. Connor Commissioner Bureau of Reclamation

COUNTYWIDE PROJECTIONS OF COMMUNITY WATER SUPPLY NEEDS IN THE MIDWEST PROJECT COMPLETION REPORT

laid in the early to mid 20th century with a lifespan of years. With utilities averaging a pipe

Assessing Regional Water Impacts of Biofuel Production Scenarios

Committee on Water. Desalination as a Water Source

Introduction to Water Assessment in GaBi Software

Evaluating Sustainability of Projected Water Demands Under Future Climate Change Scenarios

Altela, Inc. Treating water naturally

Local Water Supply Planning - North Carolina Division of Water Resources

Aquaculture Effluents and the Environment. CS Tucker, Mississippi State University

Water, Energy, and Climate Critical Links

Radiology Staffing Survey 2010

PARR HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT PARR HYDRO DEVELOPMENT & FAIRFIELD PUMPED STORAGE FACILITY DEVELOPMENT FERC PROJECT No SC SEPTEMBER 19, 2012

Environmental Geography

SOUTHERN WATER USE CAUTION AREA REVIEW

Nuclear Power: Water Impacts

Integrated Regional. South Tahoe Public Utility District. Water Management Plan. July 2014 K/J Prepared By Kennedy/Jenks Consultants

The Energy Industry: Structure and Organization. Module 1, Unit B

Importance of Rural Water to Southern Iowa s Livestock Industry. Forty-Second Annual Cornbelt Cow-Calf Conference

Water Dependency of Geothermal Power Generation Systems

Government Involvement in Desalination

Reliant on fossil fuels (coal, oil, natural gas)

A Study of United States Hydroelectric Plant Ownership

TEKS Lesson 7.8C: Effects of Human Activity on Surface Water and Groundwater

Lake County Success. support through synergistic local partnerships that not only mitigate, but also produce

Forecasting Exempt Well Demand in Spokane County Presented by: Mike Hermanson Water Resources Specialist Spokane County Utilities

Lower Ohio and Middle Mississippi Rivers Flood Management

Utilizing Unconventional Water Sources for Industrial Reuse

SUSTAINABLE AND RESILIENT URBAN WATER SYSTEMS

Use of Alternative Water Sources for Power Plant Cooling

Water Rights and Water Law 101 for Small Agricultural Producers

Chapter 6 Water Resources

Water Papers THIRSTY ENERGY. June Diego J. Rodriguez, Anna Delgado, Pat DeLaquil, Antonia Sohns. Public Disclosure Authorized

GEOTHERMAL HEAT PUMPS CONFIGURATIONS/INSTALLATION

Hello my name is Joy Loughry and I am with the groundwater technical unit of the Minnesota department of natural resources. Today I am going to talk

DISTRICT COURT, WATER DIVISION 3, STATE OF COLORADO ALL PERSONS INTERESTED IN WATER APPLICATIONS FILED IN WATER DIVISION 3.

Technologies for High Salinity Water Desalination Shaurya Prakash

Aquifer Characterization and Drought Assessment Ocheyedan River Alluvial Aquifer

Long Island: Water Resources. Water Sayings. Water Issues. Water Quality Issues specific to LI Coastal Areas. Agriculture and Water Regulation

Kevin L. Erwin CE PWS Kevin L. Erwin Consulting Ecologist, Inc Bayside Parkway Ft. Myers, Florida USA

PLANT VOGTLE UNITS 3 AND 4

Optimization of Normandy Reservoir Releases

Hydroelectric power. Made by: Kekoa, Sara, Kupaa and Bree

Transcription:

TRENDS IN U.S. THERMOELECTRIC POWER WATER USE WATER/ENERGY SUSTAINABILITY SYMPOSIUM WATER & ENERGY POLICY IN THE 21 ST CENTURY September 13 16, 2009

U.S. TRENDS IN WATER USE 1950 2000 WI THDRAWALS WITHDRAW WALS 500 310 450 450 400 400 350 350 300 300 250 250 200 150 200 100 150 50 1000 50 OPULATION P 260 260 210 210 160 160 110 60 110 10 60-40 10 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 00 05 POPULATI ION 0 TOTAL, BILLION GALLONS POPULATION, THOUSANDS 50 55 60 65 70 TOTAL, BILLION GALLONS 75 80 85 90 95 00 POPULATION, THOUSANDS 05-40

U.S. TRENDS IN THERMOELECTRIC 1950 2000 250 4,000 M ILLION GA ALLONS PER DAY 200 150 100 50 3,500 3,000 2,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 S GIGAWA ATT-HOUR 0 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 00 05 0 W IT HDRAW ALS ENERGY

2005 ALABAMA WATER USE 12 10 8 6 4 2 05 000 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 0 GROUNDWATER SURFACE WATER THERMOELECTRIC TOTAL WIT HDRAWALS, IN BGD

TREND HIGHLIGHTS TH GW withdrawals 1 to 2 percent of the total t groundwater withdrawals Geothermal through 1995 Saline withdrawals, 2000 1960,, 18 states 2000, 39 states U.S. GROUNDWATER WITHDRAWALS FOR THERMOELECTRIC POWER 3,500 3,000 2,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 0 3,200 1,610 1,470 1,390 941 1,200 Mgal/d 608 525 565 1,559 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 00

Average Annual Water Withdrawals in 1000 gallons per square mile Pacific Northwest 117 G Great t Basin B i 42 Upper Upper MS 123 Missouri 70 Ohio 185 CO 65 CA 227 Lower L CO 57 Rio Grande 50 AK-White-Red AK White Red 65 TX Gulf Region 99 High Source: 1995 Data from USGS Publication 1200 Great Lakes 184 244 TN Lower MS 199 South Atlantic Gulf 119 Low NE 61 Mid Atlantic 198

Pacific Northwest 33% 48% Great Lakes 5% Upper MS 7% Ohio 6% Missouri 39% Great Basin 54% Upper CO 34% CA 69% Lower CO 57% AK-White-Red 51% Rio Grande 44% Average Annual Consumptive Losses High Mid Atlantic 5% 3% TN Lower MS 39% TX Gulf Region 41% NE 10% South Atlantic Gulf 17% Low i percentt off water in t withdrawn ithd Source: 1995 Data from USGS Publication 1200

Water withdrawals by category Livestock Domestic Public Supply Thermoelectric >1 percent >1 percent 11 percent 48 percent >1 percent Less than 1 5 percent percent 34 percent Mining Aquaculture Industrial Irrigation

DISTRIBUTION OF 2000WATER USE Excluding Thermoelectric 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% Irrigation 65% 50% 40% 30% 20% Public supply 21% 10% 0% TH IR PS IN AQ MI DO LV

Geographic distribution of thermoelectric power withdrawals

THERMOELECTRIC WATER USE DATA BY SUBCATEGORY Site specific Condenser Other on site Fuel type Cooling type cooling needs Fossil geothermal nuclear once through recirculating County 1985 1995 2000 2005 State 1955 to 1980 1985 1995 2000 2005 Watershed 1985 1995 1950 to Water Resources Region 1980 1985 1995

BY COOLING TECHNOLOGY 2000 AND 2005 Amendment to the Federal Pollution Control Act of 1972 and 1977 that required stricter water quality standards Limited it water supplies in some areas of the U.S. Cumberland Power Plant

BY COOLING TECHNOLOGY Once through cooling Lower consumptive use relative to withdrawals Courtesy TVA

COOLING TECHNOLOGY IMPACTS ON THE Recirculating cooling WATER RESOURCE Higher consumptive use relative to withdrawals Courtesy TVA

GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION OF U.S. THERMOELECTRIC POWER PLANTS. 2000

THERMOELECTRIC TREND HIGHLIGHTS 1950 TO 2000 ~11 fold 11 fold increase in energy production ~5 fold increase in water use Reduced gal/kwh g / 44 gal/kwh 19 gal/kwh Bull Run Steam Plant

COOLING TECHNOLOGY IMPACTS By 2000 60 percent of generating capacity an alternative to once-through cooling 9 percent of the water withdrawn plants using recirculating cooling WATER DEMAND Alabama Power Company

WATER AVAILABILITY THERMOELECTRIC WATER USE

THERMOELECTRIC POWER USGS ENERGY/WATER DATA GAPS Energy Data sufficiency Universe of power plants Water withdrawals Return flow Consumptive use Public supply deliveries Monthly data Data reliability Accuracy of reporting Data accessibility Centralized datastorage Water Targeted gaging networks Targeted QW samplingsites sites Targeted groundwater models

WATER/ENERGY DATA COLLECTION DOE Energy Information Administration USGS National Water Use Information Program Data Element 2000 2005 Monthly water withdrawals. x return flows. x Monthly Monthly consumptive use. x Nuclear water data Annual withdrawals, return flow, consumptive use. x. Data Element 1995 2005 By 8 digit watershed. X Consumptive use. X Public supply deliveries. X Fuel type. X Cooling system type X. Hydroelectric power. X

THERMOELECTRIC PLANT UNIVERSE OWNERSHIP TENNESSEE EIA 2005 The Three C Group 2005 USGS UTILITIES 8 13 10 NONUTILITES 8 20 0 CO GENERATION 5 9 5 Industrial category

CRITERIA: USGS RECIRCULATING PONDS Dedicated to a single purpose; no competing needs Constructed (perched) on property Intake and discharge are internal No direct discharge to a river or lake no receiving body name Not t a Water of the U.S. and regulated by USEPA Pond is not self-sustainable