SGIPce 2014: Looking Under the Hood. January 13, 2016 George Simons Tom Mayer Jean Shelton, PhD Itron

Similar documents
Self Generation Incentive Program (SGIP) Jason Legner Sr. Program Manager

CPUC Self-Generation Incentive Program Fifth Year Impact Evaluation Final Report

AEP Ohio. Combined Heat and Power (CHP) May 24 th, 2017 Steve Giles Vice President Alternative Energy Hull & Associates, Inc.

Benchmarking of Demand Response Potentials Final Report:

2012 SGIP Impact Evaluation and Program Outlook

Economic Analysis of Large Stationary Fuel Cell Value in California

Modeling Distributed Generation Adoption Using Electric Rate Feedback Loops

Actual Performance of CHP DG Systems Installed for Industrial Applications in California

CPUC Self-Generation Incentive Program. Optimizing Dispatch and Location of Distributed Generation

Combined Heat & Power (CHP) Program Impact Evaluation

TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL M E M O R A N D U M. To: Council Members AGENDA ITEM 8

Estate Master Property Development Suite

Welcome. RETScreen s Clean Energy Policy Toolkit. Clean Energy Solutions Center Webinar 26 April 2013

Cost-Benefit Analysis of the PSE&G Energy Efficiency Program 2014 Prospective

Energy & Emissions Strategic Plan. Executive Summary. Encina Wastewater Authority. April Prepared for

Paycom Payroll Processing Instructions

Renewable Energy Update. Sustainability/Energy Committee April 22, 2014

DEMAND-SIDE MANAGEMENT MARKET POTENTIAL STUDY. Final Report. Volume 5: Distributed Generation Analysis. Prepared for: Ameren Missouri

Renewable Energy Tariff and Financial Analysis Tool. User Guide

Energy Efficiency Screening: Application of the TRC Test

Massachusetts Policies for Combined Heat & Power (CHP) Alternative Portfolio Standard. Energy Efficiency Rebates

Understanding Early Retirement of Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Systems: Going Beyond First Year Impacts Evaluations

Sustainable Energy Management

Value Proposition of Solar Photovoltaics and Fuel Cells in California

New Jersey Renewable Energy Market Assessment

REGULATORY FRAMEWORKS BEHIND DISTRIBUTED ENERGY RESOURCE MARKETS

CHAPTER 2 VENDORS. Chapter 2 introduces students to the basic way that PCA works with vendor transactions. The first thing the students do is select

Oracle. SCM Cloud Implementing Supply Chain Planning. Release 13 (update 17D)

S3 Template Scheduler Instructions

Maintenance Contract Basics Webinar July 2010

BillQuick-QuickBooks Advanced Integration Guide 2016

Massachusetts Policies for Combined Heat & Power (CHP) Alternative Portfolio Standard and the Energy Efficiency Rebates

The Value of Distributed Photovoltaics to Austin Energy and the City of Austin

Unit4 PSA Suite Business Performance Edition

Welcome / Bienvenue. RETScreen Training Institute RETScreen 101 Introduction to Clean Energy Project Analysis

CFC s Financial Webinar Series How to Submit Your Question Step 1: Type in your Step 2: Click on the Send question here. button.

MARIN CLEAN ENERGY. introducing. MCE How It Started 1/24/2011. Community Choice Aggregation. Policy. Grassroots. Public Surveys*

Summary of Net Metered Projects as of June 30, Small Net Metered Projects as of 6/30/2016 Small Group Host Projects as of 6/30/2016

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS FOR RESIDENTIAL SOLAR PV SYSTEMS WITH BATTERY STORAGE IN PG&E TERRITORY. Jayati Thakor. A Thesis Presented to

2017 Energy Preview. What to expect in Gene Beck, CEM, CLP Executive Director

Benchmarking Your Building Using ENERGY STAR Portfolio Manager

Waste Heat to Power: Emissions Free Power & Industrial Competitiveness

Load Shift Working Group.

Comparing the Carbon Emission Reductions from Various Clean Energy Projects

Student Feedback on Instruction (SFI) CoursEval Survey Intelligence Report

Welcome to Today s NACUBO Webcast. Our program will begin shortly with a brief introduction on how to use the desktop interface.

Optimum Capacity Installation of Renewable Energy for Electricity Generation in Kuwait by 2035

Reporting and Dashboards

Contents OVERVIEW... 3

PDF s of the RETScreen data sheets are attached, as are the photos used in the analysis.

Connecting Time Matters/Billing Matters and QuickBooks. 35*45 Consulting - Global 7 Second System

Contents OVERVIEW... 3

HOW INTEGRATION WORKS...3

Submitted to: Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Sage 300 ERP Sage CRM 7.1 Integration Upgrade Guide

Client Name/Presentation Title

Standby Rates as a Barrier to CHP Electricity Consumers Resource Council (ELCON) Sept. 14, 2017

Sage (UK) Limited Copyright Statement

1. Is there a preference between MW and MWh? RPS need for San Diego Gas & Electric is based upon a percentage of retail sales, which is in MWh.

6 Cost Analysis. Table 6.1 Initial System Costs

Virtual Power Plant Simulation

Part 1 Introduction and Overview

Combined Heat & Power: A Generator of Green Energy and Green Jobs

BillQuick MYOB Integration

Welcome to Speeding Up Your California Solar Initiative Application Form

MISO Distributed Generation (DG) Presentation. October 27, 2015

Contents OVERVIEW... 3

Subject: Supplement - Net Energy Metering Compliance Filing Pursuant to Resolution E- 3992:

PG&E Automated Demand Response (ADR) Incentives

Release Notes Assistance PSA Suite 2016 Spring Release

KU MIX 5.0 QUICK START GUIDE

Brent Gloy, April

ECE 333 GREEN ELECTRIC ENERGY 15. PV ECONOMICS

CHAPTER 2 VENDORS. Chapter 2 introduces students to the basic way that SCA works with vendor transactions. The first thing the students do is select

PIE Performance Process Dashboard & Grid

Risk Management User Guide

Gregory W. Stevens and Ronald K. Ishii, Alternative Energy Systems Consulting, Inc.

Combined Heat and Power ( CHP ) Request for Offers. Participants Conference January 12, 2012

CCA Terms Glossary. Valley Clean Energy Alliance. i CCA Terms Glossary

Chapter 2 explains how Sage 50 works with accounts payable transactions and

2G GAS BLENDING SYSTEM

Demystifying Rooftop Solar

Oracle Project Portfolio Management Cloud

LAZARD'S LEVELIZED COST OF ENERGY ANALYSIS VERSION 10.0 DECEMBER 2016

PG&E Automated Demand Response (ADR) Incentives

Payroll Worksheet Quick Add Data Retention. PaC configuration setup

Sage ERP Accpac 6.0A. SageCRM 7.0 I Integration Update Notice

Las Gallinas Valley Sanitation District Biogas Utilization Evaluation. LGVSD Board Meeting Presentation April 24, 2014

Microsoft Dynamics GP Business Portal. Project Time and Expense User s Guide Release 3.0

INV101: Set Up Inventory

Joint Workshop on Multiple-Use Applications and Station Power for Energy Storage CPUC Rulemaking and CAISO ESDER 2 Stakeholder Initiative

California Energy Efficiency Potential Study

Methodology for calculating subsidies to renewables

Energy Efficient Refrigerator Buying Decision An Environmental Accounting Case

Hyperion Planning. Planning Training Guide. Prepared By: UBC Management Reporting and Budgeting

Options for Reducing Peak Load

Renewable Energy Plan 2013 Biennial Review Lansing Board of Water & Light MSCP Case No. U-16619

2014 MSX Group Microsoft Forecaster User Group Forums. Questions Asked by Attendees

May 11, 2017 Advice Letter 5121-G

Welcome. Logging into the system

Transcription:

SGIPce 2014: Looking Under the Hood January 13, 2016 George Simons Tom Mayer Jean Shelton, PhD Itron

TOPICS FOR TODAY S WEBINAR» Introductions» Overview of SGIPce 2014 model Goals and objectives Inputs to the model Key outputs» Break for written questions» How to Run SGIPce Downloading and setting up the model Starting SGIPce Obtaining results Scenarios Manual changes to inputs» Break for written questions» Demonstrate the model for a technology» Q&A 2

SGIP CE 2014 OVERVIEW

GOALS AND OBJECTIVES OF THE 2014 MODEL» Publicly available cost effectiveness model» Updates the 2011 SGIPce cost effectiveness model Updated technologies, cost data, learning curves, rates and policies» Provides results to help the CPUC, PAs and stakeholders: Identify SGIP technologies that provide long term benefits Identify which technologies need SGIP incentives (and why) Establish a common basis for setting incentive levels among different technologies 4

SGIP CE 2014 MODEL Inputs SGIPce Run Processor Technology Inputs Global Inputs Calculation Engine Avoided Cost Technology Level Results w/inputs Program Level Results Rates by IOU Adoptions by Tech, Sector, Fuel, IOU, Climate Region. Outputs 5

SGIP TECHNOLOGIES EVALUATED» SGIP technologies eligible as of 2014 were evaluated» Technologies grouped by fuel type Non-fuel technologies - Advanced energy storage (stand-alone only) - Wind - Pressure reduction turbines - Waste heat to power (Organic Rankine Cycle) Natural gas fueled technologies - Fuel cells (both CHP and electric-only) - Gas turbines - IC engines - Microturbines Directed biogas fueled technologies - Fuel cells (both CHP and electric-only) - Gas turbines - IC engines - Microturbines Onsite biogas fueled technologies - Fuel cells (both CHP and electric-only) - Gas turbines - IC engines - Microturbines 6

CONFIGURATIONS EVALUATED Technology 2015 Study Nominal Size (kw) Fuels Configurations Small Fuel Cells - CHP 500 NG, OSB, DBG 3 Large Fuel Cells - CHP 1,200 NG, OSB, DBG 3 Fuel Cells Electric Only 500 NG, OSB, DBG 3 Small Gas Turbine 2,500 NG, OSB, DBG 3 Large Gas Turbine 7,000 NG, OSB, DBG 3 Small IC Engine 500 NG, OSB, DBG 3 Large IC Engine 1,500 NG, OSB, DBG 3 Microturbine 200 NG, OSB, DBG 3 Organic Rankine Cycle 500 Waste heat 1 Small Wind 50 Wind 1 Large Wind 1,500 Wind 1 Residential Fuel Cells Not treated NA Not treated Residential Storage 5 NA 1 Medium Commercial Storage 30 NA 1 Large Commercial Storage 5,000 NA 1 Pressure Reduction Turbine 500 In-conduit water flow 1 Utility-scale Combustion Turbi 100,000 NG Not treated Utility-scale Combined Cycle Sy 500,000 NG Not treated Totals: 31 7

MODELING RUNS AVAILABLE Fuel types Sector Utility Climate Region Utility Rate Financing Option Rebate Type Technologies Total Runs - With Fuel 8 3 3 3 2 6 2 4 20,736 - No fuel 7 1 3 3 2 6 2 4 6,048 All Possible 26,784 The model also generates incentives for the PCT test corresponding to MIRR levels ranging from 5% to 15% at individual percentage points 8

OTHER INPUTS» Global Discount rates (utility and societal), escalators Financing variables (e.g., tax rates, percent financed with equity, debt interests, etc.)» Avoided costs Four workbooks with gas and electric avoided costs - Utility, climate region, base case and high case Derived from E3 s 2013 NEM avoided cost calculator» Rates Electric and gas rates - Electric residential non-residential - Gas non-residential Utility charges (e.g., standby, departing load charges, etc.) 9

INPUTS: EXAMPLES OF BENEFITS» Avoided grid costs» Bill and energy savings» Rebates and incentives» Net Energy Metering Bill Credit» Environmental benefits» Reliability benefits» Tax credits and depreciation Example of weighted average electricity rates 10

CRITICAL INPUT ASSUMPTIONS» Treatment of DG Technologies CHP generation profiles based on SGIP metered data and then developed into representative 8760 hour per year profiles - Baseload (flat and step) - Non-baseload (peak and multi-peak) Wind profiles reflect location and weather dependent behavior DG capital and operating/maintenance costs - Current based on industry and SGIP data - Future capital costs based on learning curves derived from historical industry cost trends» Two super scenarios Base case (low GHG) GHG High 11

INPUTS: EXAMPLES OF OPERATIONAL CHARACTERISTICS» Type of fuel consumed or energy resource used» Capacity factors» Efficiencies (electrical and system)» Useful waste heat recovery» Annual degradation rates» Emissions (CO 2, NOx, PM) Partial listing only 12

INPUTS: EXAMPLES OF COSTS» Equipment costs» Operating costs» Nonbypassable charges» Standby charges» Interconnection costs» Administrator costs Example of technology cost worksheet 13

FUTURE COSTS AND PORTFOLIO OF TECHNOLOGIES Market adoption occurs over time Driven by technology performance and cost improvements in the future We can take into account the effect of cost improvements on cost-effectiveness using annual adoptions and learning curves

LEARNING RATES AND PROGRESS RATIOS 15

KEY OUTPUTS» Results provided at two levels» Technology level Benefit/cost test results for each technology from 2014 through 2034 Cost and benefit components» Program level Benefit/cost test results for blends of technologies from 2014 through 2034 16

STANDARD COST TESTS: PERSPECTIVES ON VALUE Total resource cost (TRC) test: combined utility and customer perspective Includes societal TRC test Participant cost test (PCT): participant s perspective Program Administrator's cost (PAC) test: utility s perspective Ratepayer Impact Measure (RIM) test: ratepayer s perspective RIM is not used in this evaluation 17

EXAMPLE OF OUTPUTS: LCOE PROFORMA FROM CALC ENGINE 18

EXAMPLE OF OUTPUTS: LEVELIZED COSTS 19

EXAMPLE OF OUTPUTS: ANNUAL CASH FLOW GRAPHIC FROM CALC ENGINE 20

EXAMPLE OF OUTPUTS: TABULAR COST TEST RESULTS (PCT) PCT 2014 2017 2020 2024 Costs System Cost $ 1,983,005 $ 2,056,007 $ 2,131,696 $ 2,236,967 O&M Cost $ 773,458 $ 713,917 $ 660,730 $ 598,676 Fueling Cost $ 2,732,264 $ 2,939,901 $ 3,140,382 $ 3,358,138 Standby Charges $ 802,178 $ 893,963 $ 1,001,241 $ 1,165,591 Total Costs $ 6,290,905 $ 6,603,788 $ 6,934,049 $ 7,359,371 Benefits Total Rebate $ - $ - $ - $ - REC Revenue $ - $ - $ - $ - State Taxes $ 481,886 $ 503,723 $ 527,234 $ 558,607 Federal Taxes $ 1,899,448 $ 1,818,075 $ 1,902,933 $ 2,016,166 Avoided Bills $ 4,940,182 $ 5,407,758 $ 5,915,570 $ 6,655,386 Total Benefits $ 7,321,515 $ 7,729,556 $ 8,345,738 $ 9,230,159 Net Benefits $ 1,030,610 $ 1,125,767 $ 1,411,689 $ 1,870,788 Ratio 1.16 1.17 1.20 1.25 21

EXAMPLE OF OUTPUTS: GRAPHICAL COST TEST RESULTS (PCT) 22

EXAMPLE OF OUTPUTS: TABULAR MIRR TEST RESULTS (PCT) 23

BREAK FOR WRITTEN QUESTIONS

INSTALLING & RUNNING SGIPCE

DOWNLOADING 2014 SGIP CE The link for downloading the model is: http://capabilities.itron.com/sgipce 26

SGIPCE DIRECTORY STRUCTURE» The compressed file, downloaded from the web site, stores the files in the proper format. Just copy the files from the zip file to a folder of your choosing. Do not try to run the program from the zip file.» You will find a pdf in the zip file that has instructions on how this should be done. Please consult this pdf for more details. 27

THE SGIPCE MODEL STRUCTURE» The model was written using Microsoft Excel» The boxes above represent workbooks that perform various tasks The data in these workbooks have been developed with great care, but if the user finds that they want to change an assumption it can be done by modifying various workbooks appropriately. 28

FLOW OF OPERATIONS WITHIN THE SGIPCE MODEL» Main menu (SGIPce.xlsm): Super Scenarios Defines the global assumptions for each scenario - Uses pre-set or default input data located in workbooks but can be changed by user through pull down menus or input data workbooks User designs and runs Super Scenarios (BAU or Greenhouse Gas) - May run one or more technologies within a scenario» Input Data Workbooks (Inputs folder) DG Technology Data Global Inputs Avoided Costs Utility Tariffs» Calculation Engine (CalcEngines folder is used for tech workbooks) Calculates outputs based on input data values and scenario selections by user. Saves outputs with critical inputs for: - Program level results - Technology level results 29

SGIPCE CONTROL WORKSHEET» This is the main control screen This is what you see when you open the SGIPce workbook This is where you select the Technology, sector, fuel used, utility, utility rate, climate region, financing, and rebate type 30

SETTING SCENARIO IDENTIFIERS AND GLOBAL ASSUMPTIONS» Some important considerations: Program scenario name: is a drop down menu that sets the model to run a Base Case or GHG treatment scenario Version description: should describe your particular run Save MIRR: if set to yes calculates the values of the rebates that result in the Modified Internal Rates of Return (MIRR) of 5 through 15 31

SELECTING TECHNOLOGY RUNS» The columns in the Technology Definitions table: Run Technology Flag Technology Name Sector Fuel Type Utility Climate Region Utility Rate Financing Options Rebate Type 32

CONDUCTING BATCH (SCENARIO) RUNS» The Buttons that control the program: Batch Process No Screen Updating Batch Process View Screen Updating Batch Process Run Unattended Clear Filters Set Run Tech Flag Off Set Run Tech Flag On Reset Progress Ratio Override 33

WHAT HAPPENS WHEN THE RUN FAILS: THE ERROR LOG» The user must always consult this worksheet It shows the disposition of every run and if a run fails it shows where the failure occurred. 34

THE CALC ENGINE 35

SGIP CE CALCULATION ENGINE» Workbook Structure Cover - Run documentation Results - Results worksheet for current run. LCOE ProForma - Based on levelized cost workbook Inputs - Aggregation of inputs by period for use in the calculation worksheet Technology - Technology level input constants Annual Inputs - Technology level annual inputs Finance - Financial inputs 36

SGIP CE CALC ENGINE - RESULTS TAB TEST CALCULATIONS AND LEVELIZED CASH FLOWS

SGIP CE CALC ENGINE - LCOE TAB THE CALCULATION ENGINE 38

Examples of SGIPce Output Screens SGIPce Run Processor Calculation Engine Technology Inputs Global Inputs Avoided Cost Technology Level Results w/inputs Program Level Results Rates by IOU Adoptions by Tech, Sector, Fuel, IOU, Climate Region. 39

SGIP CE RESULTS WORKBOOK» Workbook Structure (Results folder) Cover - Run documentation Adoptions - Table of adoptions for all available runs SummaryStats_perUnit - Summary stats for each line item in batch run at the individual technology level. SummaryStats_Totals - Aggregated totals and cost test calculations - Graphical representation of results Template - A hidden worksheet used to store each technology line items results in the workbook. <Run results worksheet(s)> 40

SGIP CE RESULTS - COVER PAGE 41

SGIP CE RESULTS SUMMARY STATISTICS 42

SGIP CE RESULTS TECHNOLOGY CHARTS 43

SETTING UP A SGIP CE SCENARIO

CREATING A BASE CASE IN THE SGIP CE WORKBOOK Configure Identifiers Once configured Press a button to run the scenario Can select each technology or a group of technology Can select market sector (e.g., residential, commercial, govt., etc.) Can select fuel type (e.g., natural gas, directed biogas, onsite biogas)

CALC ENGINE PROVIDES FEEDBACK ON RUN DECIDING TO SAVE EACH CALCULATION ENGINE.» The user may decide to save the Calculation Engine for each technology selected in the run they define» By saving the all the Calculation Engines the user is able to review all the inputs used to generate the results.» These inputs include: Technology Fuel Type Utility Region (inland or coastal) Rebate type (EPBB or PBI) If progress ratio is different then default Expected capacity factor All inputs used to calculate the selected technology

EXAMPLE: ICE 500KW CALCULATION ENGINE COVER PAGE 47

EXAMPLE: ICE 500KW CALCULATION ENGINE TECHNOLOGY INPUTS 48

EXAMPLE: ICE 500KW CALCULATION ENGINE ANNUAL INPUTS 49

EXAMPLE: ICE 500KW CALCULATION ENGINE SETTING FINANCIAL INPUTS 50

EXAMPLE: ICE 500KW CALCULATION ENGINE RESULTS FROM RUN 51

MANUALLY CHANGING SGIP CE INPUTS

MANUAL CHANGES TO SGIP CE INPUTS: WARNING Making manual changes to the inputs or logic makes support next to impossible. Make sure you maintain a clean copy of every workbook in case a change causes the system to fail. 53

MANUAL CHANGES TO SGIP CE INPUTS: ONSITE BIOGAS EXAMPLE Field can be toggled from Yes to No. Yes if onsite; otherwise No. 54

MANUAL CHANGES TO SGIP CE INPUTS: COST CHANGES EXAMPLE Cost changes can be made manually to any of these costs 55

MANUAL CHANGES TO SGIP CE : THINGS TO REMEMBER» Changes are made to input workbooks in the Inputs folder» Always save the original files Use a suffix like SGIPce_Inputs_Tech_GTle3MW_NR_OSBGas_old» Rename the changed file to the original file name» Save the model» Run it with the changed values» Make sure version name reflects this is a manual change Inputs folder Input workbooks 56

BREAK FOR WRITTEN QUESTIONS

DYNAMIC RUN EXAMPLE

QUESTIONS?

THANK YOU George Simons George.Simons@itron.com 509-891-3180 Dr. Jean Shelton Jean.Shelton@itron.com 858-724-2671 Tom Mayer Tom.Mayer@itron.com 510-844-2826 www.itron.com