Programmatic Categorical Exclusions

Similar documents
APPENDIX A. NEPA Assessment Checklist

Categorical Exclusion Programmatic Agreement Between the Federal Highway Administration And the Indiana Department of Transportation

An Overview and Comparison of the Tennessee Department of Transportation s Environmental Evaluation Process

PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT FOR APPROVAL OF CERTAIN CATEGORICAL EXCLUSIONS

Attachment A FTA DCE Worksheet Section II, NEPA Class of Action

Instructions for the SDDOT Categorical Exclusion Checklist and Environmental Commitments Checklist

The term Significant as used in NEPA is defined at 40 CFR and requires consideration of both context and intensity.

DECISION MEMO. West Fork Blacktail Deer Creek Hardened Crossing

Introduction. The term Significant as used in NEPA is defined at 40 CFR and requires consideration of both context and intensity.

Arizona Association of County Engineers New Rules for Categorical Exclusions for FHWA Projects

Categorical Exclusion (CE)

PUBLIC NOTICE. Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344) Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 (33 U.S.C.

Northwest State Route 138 Corridor Improvement Project

Blanche Park Reservoir Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact

The project will be conducted in partnership with the Nez Perce Tribe.

DECISION MEMO. USDA Forest Service. Butte District Silver Bow County T4N, R8W, Section 36

Appendix H Mitigation Monitoring Plan

CEQA and its Role in Historic Preservation. Darcy Kremin, AICP Bay Area Environmental Practice Leader Michael Baker International, Oakland, CA

3-13 Other Required Findings and Regulatory Compliance

FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT OWL CREEK GRAVEL PIT EXPANSION U.S. FOREST SERVICE

ESTIMATE OF QUANTITIES

DECISION MEMO. East Fork Blacktail Trail Reroute

SAN LUIS VALLEY PUBLIC LANDS CENTER

Beaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest Madison Ranger District

Project Name: Gerber Stew Stewardship Contract CX Log #: OR-014 CX Chase Mtn./ Upper Bear Valley Plantation Thinnings

MDOT SHA s NEPA/MEPA, Agency and Public Involvement Processes. Presentation to BRTB s Technical Committee August 1, 2017

Indirect and Cumulative Effects

Bureau of Land Management National Sage-Grouse Habitat Conservation Strategy

CHAPTER 9 DISCUSSIONS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Background. Purpose and Need. Proposal. Mitigation and Design Features

[FWS R8 ES 2017 N107; FXES FF08ECAR00] Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Incidental Take Permit

DECISION MEMO. Missoula Electric Cooperative Point 118. MEC - Buried Electric Powerline (Along West Fork Butte Access Road #37 to Point 118)

PROGRAM NAME: Northfield Owner-Occupied Home Rehabilitation 2015

PUBLIC NOTICE US Army Corps of Engineers, Honolulu District

Proposed Action: In response to resource specialist concerns raised during internal scoping, the following restrictions will apply:

Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Ecology and Transportation (ICOET 2013)

LOCATION AND DESIGN DIVISION

WHEREAS, the Boston Landmarks Commission (BLC) has participated in the consultation and has been invited to concur in the Agreement; and

I-70 East PACT DRAFT EVALUATION DATA

INDEX FOR UNIFORM FILE SYSTEM, ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS

Project Delivery. Rodger Rochelle, PE Technical Services Administrator. Mike Holder, PE Chief Engineer

TRANSMITTAL LETTER. Design Manual Part 1B Post-TIP NEPA Procedures November 2015 Edition

WELCOME IL 47. Community Advisory Group Meeting #5 Waubonsee Community College Wednesday, May 31, 2017

Preliminary Decision Memo 2015 Recreation Residence Projects Odell Lake

It s Cool to Be Safe

SH 34 Corridor Study & Environmental Assessment:

Environmental Information Worksheet

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT CHECKLIST

DECISION NOTICE & FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT OUTFITTER GUIDE MOTORIZED TOURS SPECIAL USE PERMIT ISSUANCES

2.1 Project Definition/Classification/Initial Study Project Definition

Public Notice October 21, 2016 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Charleston District

PUBLIC HEARING LOOP 9

DECISION MEMO IDAHO DREAM PLAN OF OPERATIONS

Public Meeting. US Highways 18 & 281 and SD Highway 50 From Douglas County Line to SD46 Charles Mix County

6. The following paragraphs provide further interim guidance where the ACHP regulations are not specific to the Corps Regulatory Program:

GEOMETRIC DESIGN CRITERIA for Non-freeway Resurfacing, Restoration, and Rehabilitation Projects

Appendix I Endangered Species (Correspondence) DRAFT

PUBLIC NOTICE. REPLY TO: Denver Regulatory Office 9307 South Wadsworth Blvd 30 DAY NOTICE Littleton, CO FAX (303)

Updates on FAA Order F. Agenda. Communicate FAA Order Updates. Educate attendees on the changes to FAA Order

DECISION MEMO Divide Creek Barrier Enhancement

Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact

APPENDIX F: CALTRANS COST ESTIMATE TEMPLATE (included in Appendix AA of the CALTRANS Project Development Procedures Manual)

MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION & MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM CITY OF CHICO PLANNING DIVISION

DRAFT FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT. for. Tioga Sports Park

October 19, 2017 Community Engagement Panel Meeting #4 Overview of Environmental Effects

Construction operations shall be conducted in a manner to provide DOT forces access to the Maintenance Yard on a continuous basis.

J O I N T P U B L I C N O T I C E

Downtown Estes Loop Project Frequently Asked Questions

Programmatic Categorical Exclusion Decision-Making Guide

State Route 8 Bridge Replacement Project

Concept, Feasibility & Mobility Studies. Southport Connector Expressway

MASTER AGREEMENT FOR BRIDGE DESIGN SERVICES SCOPE OF WORK

THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS NON-NHS BRIDGE R&R POLICY

PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT. Utah Crew Rowing Dock Conditional Use 830 S. Delong Street September 8, 2010 Petition #PLNPCM

Record of Decision for Issuing a Presidential Permit to Champlain Hudson Power Express,

DECISION MEMO. Aurora New Horizons Project

National Housing Trust Fund Environmental Review and Funding Requirements

Chapter 10 Natural Environment

National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Process and Federal Agency Compliance

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NORFOLK DISTRICT CORPS OF ENGINEERS FORT NORFOLK 803 FRONT STREET NORFOLK, VIRGINIA

Environmental Assessment

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION BUREAU OF MINING AND RECLAMATION. Coal Refuse Disposal - Site Selection

FINAL INSPECTION OF CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS

COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS. Categorical Exclusions for Oil and Gas Exploration and Development Activities. USDA Forest Service

IRVINE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM FOR THE PLANNING AREA 6 NORTH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

Draft Environmental Assessment Terminal B/C Redevelopment, Secure National Hall, and Related Improvements

All driveways shall have a separate site plan when the application is submitted.

County of Calaveras Department of Planning

Draft Decision Notice Maroon Bells - Snowmass Wilderness Overnight Visitor Use Management Plan

J O I N T P U B L I C N O T I C E

Chapter 6 Avoidance, Minimization, and Mitigation

PROPOSED ACTION Cooperative Horse Removal with Fort McDermitt Paiute-Shoshone Tribe

DECISION MEMO Besson Special Use Permit Ottawa National Forest

Appendix J Greater Sage-grouse Habitat Equivalency Analysis

TIER 1 DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT. 7. Affected Environment, Environmental Consequences, and Mitigation Strategies

Conger Rock Harvesting Project

National Forests in North Carolina Pisgah National Forest Grandfather Ranger District

JOINT PUBLIC NOTICE SAM PAH U. S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY OFFICE OF POLLUTION CONTROL

Chapter 3 Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences

Factor Potential Effects Mitigation Measures

Transcription:

Memorandum of Agreement for Approval of Categorical Exclusions between the Federal Highway Administration and the Wyoming Department of Transportation. February 12, 2014 The Federal Highway Administration, Wyoming Division (FHWA) and the Wyoming Department of Transportation (WYDOT) have developed this Memorandum of Agreement to outline the procedures for the processing of Categorical Exclusions (CE) for Federal-aid actions within Wyoming under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). This agreement supersedes previously dated MOA s for Approval of Categorical Exclusions with the FHWA including the previous MOA concurred by FHWA on October 19, 2011. FHWA concurs on a "programmatic" basis, with WYDOT s designation that those types of projects that satisfy certain conditions identified in this agreement will not result in significant social, economic, and environmental impacts, and are, therefore, categorically excluded from the requirement to prepare an Environmental Assessment (EA) or Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). Categorical Exclusions are actions which meet the definition contained in 23 CFR 771.117(a), that is, they are actions which individually or cumulatively do not involve significant environmental impacts. In addition, regulation 23 CFR 771.117(b) states that any action, which would normally be classified as a CE, but could involve unusual circumstances, will require that the FHWA, in cooperation with the WYDOT, conduct appropriate environmental studies to determine if the CE classification is correct. WYDOT has determined three classifications of CEs (Programmatic, General and Comprehensive) as part of this Programmatic Agreement. The three classifications meet the requirements for a CE according to 23 CFR 771.117(a) and (b) and incorporate actions from 23 CFR 771.117 (c) and (d). Programmatic Categorical Exclusions Programmatic Categorical Exclusions are actions that based on past experiences have not directly, indirectly or cumulatively caused significant impacts to the human or natural environment. Programmatic Categorical Exclusions apply to actions that frequently occur on the existing pavement, occur in the previously disturbed road template, are maintenance or repair projects, are improvements to existing structures and will have no ground disturbance or nominal ground disturbance. Programmatic Categorical Exclusions will not be used on any project within the National Forest. This will ensure any species of local concern by the Forest will be considered and documented in the environmental document. Programmatic Categorical Exclusions are predominantly actions in 771.117 (c) and may include, but are not limited to, the following improvements to existing transportation facilities: Fence maintenance 1

Categorical Exclusion Memorandum of Agreement FHWA-WYDOT Post sign installations Pavement markings Signal and gate replacement/repair Disposal of excess right-of-way Changes in access control Upgrading, removing, adding guardrail Upgrading, removing, adding median barrier Installing or replacing impact attenuators Installing or replacing delineators Resurfacing Chip seal, crack seal and patching Installation of dilemma zone protection Dust suppression on roads Installing rumble strips Surfacing on at-grade rail road crossings Any project within the operational right-of-way (previously disturbed areas) Any project that receives less than $5,000,000 of Federal funds or with a total estimated cost of not more than $30,000,000 and Federal funds comprising less than 15 percent of the total estimated project cost (must comply with 23 CFR 771.117(a)(b)) FHWA and WYDOT agree that all programmatic categorical exclusions determined by the WYDOT are programmatically approved and will be documented using the WYDOT s programmatic categorical exclusion package, without the Form 100. The signature of the WYDOT Environmental Services Manager or his/her designee on the CE is required and the CE does not require additional approval by FHWA. Project documentation will become a permanent part of the project file and will be available for FHWA review upon request. General Categorical Exclusion General Categorical Exclusions are additional actions that qualify as CEs, predominately actions in 23 CFR 771.117 (d). FHWA and WYDOT have agreed to a general categorical exclusion classification and approval process for these actions. If each of the following conditions are satisfied, the action is classified as a CE and does not require additional approval by FHWA. 1. The action does not have significant environmental impacts as described in 23 CFR 771.117 (a). 2. The action does not involve unusual circumstances as described in 23 CFR 771.117 (b). 3. Does not involve the acquisition of more than minor amounts of permanent right-of-way, such acquisitions will not require any commercial or residential displacement. 4. Does not involve a determination of an adverse effect by the State Historic Preservation Office. 5. Does not involve a disproportionately high and adverse impact on minority or low-income populations. 6. Does not involve a Type 1 action requiring a noise assessment. 2

Categorical Exclusion Memorandum of Agreement FHWA-WYDOT Appendix A: Programmatic Categorical Exclusion Package Appendix B: Categorical Exclusion Template with Form 100 4

Appendix A Programmatic Categorical Exclusion Package

Matthew H. Mead Governor John F. Cox Director DATE Mr. Joseph Dailey Project: Various Wyoming Division Administrator Project No: Various Federal Highway Administration Various Locations 2617 E. Lincolnway, Suite D County: Cheyenne, WY 82001-5662 Dear Mr. Dailey: The following project(s) have been evaluated and found to meet the criteria for a Programmatic Categorical Exclusion under the memorandum of agreement with FHWA dated February 12, 2014. PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION These projects are at various locations, and are for miscellaneous work as described in the attached Categorical Exclusion Package. There are ## projects covered by this CE PREPARER Kathy Wenger, Environmental Project Coordinator, Wyoming Department of Transportation DETERMINATION I determine that these projects are Automatic Programmatic Categorical Exclusions. Timothy L. Stark, P.E. Date Environmental Services Engineer Attachments: Categorical Exclusion Package

Categorical Exclusion Package DATE Project Description District County Fiscal Year Type of Work Project No. ####### Project Prefix Project Name RM ##-## Project No. ####### Project Prefix Project Name RM ##-## Project No. ####### Project Prefix Project Name RM ##-##

Appendix B Categorical Exclusion Template with Form 100

Matthew H. Mead Governor John F. Cox Director DATE Mr. Joseph Dailey CE Number: INSERT CE NUMBER Wyoming Division Administrator Project No: INSERT PROJECT NUMBER Federal Highway Administration INSERT PROJECT NAME 2617 E. Lincolnway, Suite D INSERT ROAD NAME Cheyenne, WY 82001-5662 INSERT COUNTY Reference Marker: xx.xx - xx.xx TYPE OF WORK Dear Mr. Dailey: Pursuant to the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act, the Wyoming Department of Transportation (WYDOT) submits this Categorical Exclusion (CE) for the above referenced project. Justification for the determination of minimal and temporary impacts is presented in the following sections. PROJECT LOCATION The proposed project is located on INSERT ROAD NAME between TOWN and TOWN in INSERT COUNTY, Wyoming. More specifically the proposed project is located between Reference Markers (RM) xx.xx - xx.xx in Section ##, T##N, R##W (Figure 1). (A beneficial Figure may be placed in text or as attachment). The total length of the project is XX miles. FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION INSERT ROAD NAME is classified as XX and is or is not on the National Highway System (NHS) EXISTING ROADWAY SECTION The existing typical roadway section consists of XX foot lanes and XX foot shoulders. (Include information about turn lanes or other roadway features.) PURPOSE AND NEED The primary purpose of this project is to XXXX. ACCIDENT RECORDS Highway traffic accidents reported between RM XX and XX from YEAR thru YEAR totaled XX. (Describe the general type of accidents, if any are related to a roadway feature.) TRAFFIC VOLUMES Revised: 11/01/13

Project No: INSERT PROJECT NUMBER INSERT PROJECT NAME Page 2 of 8 The average annual daily total traffic for RM XXX - XXX in 20XX is #### vehicles and the average annual truck traffic is ###. Alternatives The No Action alternative would result in continued problems involving XXX. The preferred alternative is to XXXX. AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT / IMPACTS The attached Wyoming Department of Transportation Form 100 summarizes potential environmental impacts associated with this project. There is a potential for minimal and temporary impacts, associated with construction. These impacts, and other pertinent issues, are discussed in more detail below. SOCIAL IMPACTS Land Use Changes Community Cohesion Relocation Potential Churches and Schools Controversy Potential Energy Utilities Designated Emergency Routes Expand on topic if it cannot be addressed on one line on Form 100 otherwise delete) Environmental Justice Public Transportation Right-of-Way

Project No: INSERT PROJECT NUMBER INSERT PROJECT NAME Page 3 of 8 Construction Permits Pedestrian and Bicycle ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL IMPACTS Are historic properties present or not WYDOT s determination of effect? Also, reference if any specific class III inventories were completed. (Determinations that adversely affect historic properties will need a different discussion here.) Consultation with The State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) was initiated on DATE. SHPO concurred in a determination of (no historic properties affected, no historic properties adversely affected ) on DATE and recommends WYDOT proceed in accordance with state and federal laws subject to the following stipulation: If any cultural materials are discovered during construction, work in the area shall halt immediately, the appropriate State and Federal agency shall be contacted, and the materials evaluated by an archaeologist or historian meeting the Secretary of Interior s Professional Qualification Standards (48 FR22716, Sept. 1983). Structure ### over XX creek will be replaced. The structure was built in 19XX and consists of seven continuous reinforced concrete slabs. As per the 2012, Program Comment issued by the Advisory Council on Historic Bridges, no documentation or evaluation is required. SECTION 4(f) State whether or not 4(f) properties are present and how or how they are not being impacted. No 4(f) properties are present or No 4(f) properties are being affected. Recreational Areas / Refuges Historic Properties NATURAL ENVIRONMENT Wetlands and other Waters of the U.S. (Expand on topic address whether or not wetlands are present.) Water Quality Storm water run-off along the roadway will be controlled during construction according to the Wyoming Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (WYPDES) permit obtained by the contractor. Wild and Scenic Rivers Floodplains Farmlands

Project No: INSERT PROJECT NUMBER INSERT PROJECT NAME Page 4 of 8 Wildlife and Habitat (State where or not habitat is present and whether or not there will be impacts. Remember to indicate whether or not project is in sage grouse core area and address appropriately.) Threatened and Endangered Species 1. No Effect Determinations This project was included in Appendix A of the Programmatic Biological Assessment (PBA) for WYDOT s 2010-2014 program. It has a no effect determination for listed species in the project area. This project was not included in Appendix A of the Programmatic Biological Assessment for WYDOT s 2010-2014 program. However, the project will have no effect on any listed species. (Proceeding discussion in CE should justify no effect determination) 2. May Affect Determinations For Projects Included In Appendix A This project was included in Appendix A of the Programmatic Biological Assessment (PBA) for WYDOT s 2010-2014 program. The project has a not likely to adversely affect or likely to adversely affect determination for listed species (provide specific species) in the project area. (Include a statement regarding the implementation of all appropriate terms and conditions per the Programmatic Biological Opinion (PBO), if applicable. The terms and conditions only pertain to Ute ladies -tresses orchid and Colorado butterfly plant and Preble s meadow jumping mouse 3. May Affect Determinations For Projects Not Included In Appendix A This project was not included in Appendix A of the Programmatic Biological Assessment (PBA) for WYDOT s 2010-2014 program, but its potential effects to listed species are the same or less than the effects of the other projects included in Appendix A. This project is not likely to adversely affect or likely to adversely affect listed species (provide specific species) in the project area. (Include a statement regarding the implementation of appropriate terms and conditions per the Programmatic Biological Opinion (PBO), if applicable. The terms and conditions only pertain Ute ladies -tresses orchid and Colorado butterfly plant and Preble s meadow jumping mouse. Text for Colorado (Green) River Basin Projects The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has determined that water depletions from the upper Colorado River Basin may have an effect on downstream threatened and endangered species. Water depletions from the Colorado (Green) River Basin will be handled through a programmatic agreement. Text for Platte River Basin Projects The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has determined that water depletions from the upper Platte River Basin may have an effect on downstream threatened and endangered species. Water depletions from the Platte River Basin will be handled under Wyoming s Depletions Plan through the USFWS Platte River Recovery Implementation Program. Vegetation Ecosystem

Project No: INSERT PROJECT NUMBER INSERT PROJECT NAME Page 5 of 8 PHYSICAL IMPACTS Noise Air Quality Temporary Impacts Existing Contamination Hazardous Waste Sites Visual Pits and Borrow Sources List pit and borrow locations and if previously cleared PUBLIC PARTICIPATION Has there been any public meetings or are any planned. ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS The contractor will become familiar with and adhere to all laws relevant to minimizing damage to the environment. If any impacts are discovered during project work, the appropriate personnel will be notified immediately to evaluate the impacts and determine the proper measures to be taken to prevent further impacts and mitigate any impacts that require mitigation. The following measures will be implemented on this project to minimize environmental impacts: Compliance with the Army Core of Engineers Permit Compliance with the Wyoming Game and Fish letter regarding Aquatic Invasive Species (AIS) Compliance with the Wyoming Game and Fish sage grouse compliance letter Fen avoidance measures Archeological site avoidance or onsite monitoring Biological Monitoring - raptor nest monitoring or avoidance, sage grouse, etc Timing Restrictions (aquatic, terrestrial, avian and social) ENHANCEMENT SUMMARY Summarizes any enhancements (actions taken above and beyond mitigation)

Project No: INSERT PROJECT NUMBER INSERT PROJECT NAME Page 6 of 8 PREPARER Name, Title, Organization DETERMINATION I determine that Wyoming Project INSERT PROJECT NUMBER is a general categorical exclusion under the memorandum of agreement with FHWA dated October 19, 2011. The following Form 100 describes the impact evaluation and findings. -or- I determine that Wyoming Project INSERT PROJECT NUMBER is a comprehensive categorical exclusion under the memorandum of agreement with FHWA dated October 19, 2011. The following Form 100 describes the impact evaluation and findings. (needs FHWA signature) Sincerely, Timothy L. Stark, P.E. Date Wyoming Department of Transportation Concur with determination, Joseph Dailey Date Federal Highways Administration Attachments: Form 100 - Environmental Impact Evaluation Figure 1: Site Location (optional) State Historic Preservation Office Concurrence Letter dated XXX Wyoming Game and Fish Comment Letter dated XX

INSERT PROJECT NAME CE Number: INSERT CE NUMBER INSERT COUNTY Wyoming Department of Transportation Form 100 - Environmental Impact Evaluation SEVERITY OF IMPACTS Project Number: INSERT PROJECT NUMBER INSERT ROAD NAME Reference Marker: xx.xx - xx.xx SOCIAL IMPACTS Land Use Changes Community Cohesion Relocation Potential Churches and Schools Controversy Potential Energy Utilities Designated Emergency Routes Environmental Justice Public Transportation Right-of-Way Construction Permits Pedestrian & Bicycle Minimal No Impacts None Present ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL IMPACTS Historic Sites / Districts Archaeological Sites SECTION 4 (f) Recreational Areas / Refuges Historic Properties NATURAL ENVIRONMENT IMPACTS Waters of the U.S. and Wetlands Water Quality Wild and Scenic Rivers Floodplains Farmlands Wildlife and Habitat Threatened and Endangered Species Vegetation Ecosystem PHYSICAL IMPACTS Noise Air Quality Temporary Impacts Contamination Hazardous Waste Sites Visual PERMITS REQUIRED REMARKS WATERS OF THE U.S. FINDINGS