TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION LAREDO DISTRICT EAGLE FORD SHALE: IMPACTS TO THE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM

Similar documents
Case 2:03-cv TJW Document Filed 08/04/2006 Page 1 of 7 APPENDIX C

Economic Impact of the Eagle Ford Shale

INTERSTATE CORRIDOR PLANNING

Update on the Eagle Ford Shale

ENERGY SECTOR CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

Roadway Safety and Energy Development

Rehabilitation Recommendations for FM 97 in Gonzales County

Nueces River Watershed

A Close Look at the Vista Ridge Water Pipeline: What is it Good For?

OIL AND GAS DOCKET NO

Executive Summary Total Impacts Eagle Ford Shale Counties at the Regional Level (14-County Area)

Stop searching for property records at the courthouse. Find them from your desktop in minutes.

Oil and Gas Emission Inventory, Eagle Ford Shale

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OVERVIEW

WINDFARM DEVELOPMENT. FM 1847, Pharr District, Cameron County. Date. Footer Text

TxDOT Chip Seal Over Geotextile Fabric. Research Project

Trans-Texas Corridor-35 Update

FIGURE 2.1. REGIONAL WATER PLANNING AREAS.

EMERGENCY OPERATIONS Educational Series

Shale of the Century

What s s New in Texas Uranium


I-35 Corridor Segment Committee NW Loop 410 San Antonio, Texas. March 11, :00 AM to Noon

North Central Texas Council of Governments 157

of the Eagle Ford Shale

The project consisted of 7 miles of 36-inch pipeline and associated facilities. UPI provide EPCM

Use of Existing Highway ROW for High-Speed Passenger Rail and Freight Transportation Systems

Corpus Christi Yoakum Regional Freight Mobility Study Phase I Report TABLE OF CONTENTS

STATEWIDE ANALYSIS MODEL (SAM-V3) June 5, 2014 Janie Temple

OPEN DATA & PROJECT TRACKER. Michael Chamberlain TPP, Data Management

ALTERNATIVE PROJECT DELIVERY

Descriptive Statistics and Well County Maps

7.0 Stakeholder and Public Outreach

PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM. Rater s Manual FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010 APR. 2009

Water Use In the Eagle Ford Shale Play: A Systems Dynamics Approach

IH 820 Corridor Improvement Study Randol Mill Road To North SH 121 Interchange. Public Meeting. Thursday April 4, 2013

Building Interstate 69 As A Series of Upgrade Projects

I-10 KENDALL EXTENSION. Open House

Prestressed Member Fabrication Plants (Multi-Project) Material Producer List Construction Division Materials & Pavements Section

Climate Change/Extreme Weather Vulnerability and Risk Assessment for Transportation Infrastructure in Dallas and Tarrant Counties

W. W. HAY SEMINAR SERIES. Tower 55 Multimodal Improvements NATIONAL UNIVERSITY RAIL CENTER UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN

ENERGY SLIDESHOW. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas

TEXAS TRANSPORTATION PLAN

Historic Bridge Adoption Information Packet. Medina County CR 662 Francisco Perez Creek

UNDERSTANDING PMIS: RIDE, PATCHING, AND OTHER FACTORS. Darlene C. Goehl, P.E. Dist. Pavement-Materials Engr. TxDOT - BRY

2017 Highway Safety Improvement Program Call

NCDOT Overview. Nick Tennyson, Chief Deputy Secretary March 4, 2015

TEXAS FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN: FACILITATING TEXAS ECONOMIC GROWTH AND GLOBAL COMPETIVENESS

Water Management Barnett Shale November 21, 2008

Tech Brief PRECAST CONCRETE PAVEMENT IMPLEMENTATION BY U.S. HIGHWAY AGENCIES

STATEWIDE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS AND REPORTING SYSTEM (STARS II)

Current Trends in Traffic Congestion Mitigation

Why specify Surface Aggregate Classification A (SAC-A)?

NYSDOT Roadway Inventory. Both On and Off the State System

Stabilizing Sulfate-Rich Soils Using Traditional Stabilizers: A Continuing Case Study of State Highway 289 in Grayson County, Texas

Technical Methods Part 2


Future Trends. Asphalt Rubber. Gregory S. Cleveland, P.E. TxDOT Construction Division. f HMA. f 1

Oil and Gas Regulations and TCEQ Lessons Learned

TEXAS FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN. Greater Houston Freight Committee Kick-Off Meeting

summary report West Texas Rail Feasibility Study Texas Department of Transportation Cambridge Systematics, Inc. HNTB August 2011

For Public Input Period

Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas

TECHNICAL PROPOSAL SECTION A.

Public Meeting. US Highways 18 & 281 and SD Highway 50 From Douglas County Line to SD46 Charles Mix County

MONITORING IMPLEMENTATION AND PERFORMANCE

LAS VEGAS STREET RAILROAD CROSSING RR/PUC CONNECTION AND PRELIMINARY DESIGN

PUBLIC HEARING LOOP 9

CONTINUOUSLY REINFORCED CONCRETE AND UNPAVED ROADS CONDITION SURVEY FIELD MANUAL PUBLICATION 343 APRIL 2017 PUB 343 (4-17)

STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS (SOQ) SCREENING

2015 Ozone Standard. David Brymer. Air Quality Division. Presented to the 2016 Texas Transportation Planning Conference June 16, 2016

2009 through Texas Department of Transportation

2016 Mid-Continent Transportation Research Symposium, October 24-25, Donna Brown-Martin, Director Bureau of Planning and Economic Development

Regional Initiatives on Land Use and Transportation

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Background of Existing Facility 3. Proposed Work 4

2 Purpose and Need. 2.1 Study Area. I-81 Corridor Improvement Study Tier 1 Draft Environmental Impact Statement

Oil & Gas Update. December 2014 Oil & Gas Update

DECISION MEMO. Steve Simpson and Associates, Inc. Simpson #114 & #116 Gas Well Project Compartment 106

M D 355 [FR E D E R IC K R O A D] OVER

TTI s Capabilities in Connected Transportation

Development of Groundwater Model for GMA-12 Using a Participatory Framework for Data Collection and Model Calibration

Appendix B. Benefit-Cost Technical Memorandum

Flexible Pavement of Ohio

1. Introduction Noise Analysis Results Figures. List of Tables

Project Initiation Form

Presentation to Dallas City Council by Ed Ireland, Ph. D. August 1, 2012

2006 GIS-T T Symposium Columbus Ohio

Chris Bosco, P.E., PTOE

South Carolina Department of Transportation. Engineering Directive

FREIGHT PLAN UPDATE/CRITICAL FREIGHT CORRIDORS. Association of Texas MPOs 2017 Summer Meeting

Responding to Complex Integrated System Challenges: Energy, Water, Food Dale L. Keairns

Howard Energy Partners. Howard Energy México. March 2016

South Boston. Transportation Plan. Transportation Planning Division. Virginia Department of Transportation

Modeling Applications for Freight Tennessee DOT Freight Planning

Union Pacific in Houston: Investing to Meet Freight Demands. Brenda Mainwaring, VP Public Affairs, November 12, 2013

Retaining Walls. and Going Beyond the Standards

NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS. OU Meteorology Field Trip October 20, 2017

CITY OF ELK GROVE SPEED CONTROL PROGRAM GUIDELINES

Regional Mobility Authorities in Texas

Texas Freight Advisory Committee

Transcription:

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION LAREDO DISTRICT EAGLE FORD SHALE: IMPACTS TO THE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM Melisa D. Montemayor October 23, 2012

Overview 1. Eagle Ford Shale 2. Impact to The System 3. Pavement Impact 4. Traffic Operations Impact 5. A Look at the Budget 6. Solutions

Eagle Ford Shale Largest single economic development in the history of the state of Texas, $25 Billion South Texas Economy in 2011. Located South Texas and produces from various depths between 4,000 and 14,000 feet. Is the most active shale play in the world with 250 rigs running. Well production across 30 county area: Atascosa County TX Austin County, TX Bastrop County, TX Bee County, TX Brazos County, TX Burleson County, TX Colorado County, TX DeWitt County TX Dimmit County, TX Duval County, TX Fayette County, TX Frio County, TX Goliad County, TX Gonzales County, TX Grimes County, TX Karnes County, TX La Salle County, TX Lavaca County, TX Lee County, TX Leon County, TX Live Oak County, TX Madison County, TX Maverick County, TX McMullen County, TX Milam County, TX Robertson County, TX Washington County, TX Webb County, TX Wilson County, TX Zavala County, TX 3

Impacts to The State The energy sector is of tremendous value to our state This issue will occur in other areas of the state in the future It will require a cooperative effort among a large group of interests to address the issue There are immediate, mid-term and long-term concerns to address

Impacts to The State This issue will persist for 20 40 years or longer We must be proactive in addressing this issue Creative and innovative solutions will be required Strategic and holistic planning will be required Current research efforts need to be expanded Time is of the essence

Impacts to the System Research has determined that the service life on IH, US, SH, and FM highways is reduced: Due to truck traffic associated with natural gas well operations alone between: 1% and 16% for rig movements 1% and 34% for the saltwater disposal traffic 4% and 53% for construction traffic Overall Impact (Average) 30%

Impacts to the System (Cont.) Due to truck traffic associated with crude oil well operations alone between: 1% and 3% for construction traffic 2% and 16% for the production traffic Overall impact (Average) 16%

Traffic Generators Compressor plant Compressor plant 8

Traffic Impacts

Increased Traffic/Safety Concerns

Safety/Environmental Concerns

Bridge Impacts/Restrictions

ROW Issues

Loaded Trucks Per Gas Well (Based on Information from Fort Worth Barnett Shale) 1,184 loaded trucks to bring one gas well into Production, plus 353 loaded trucks per year to maintain, plus 997 loaded trucks every 5 Years to refrac the well This is equivalent to roughly 8 Million cars plus an additional 2 Million cars per year to maintain

Typical Traffic throughout La Salle, Dimmit, & Zavala Counties

FM 133 La Salle County Edge Drop-offs

FM 469 La Salle Co Pavement Failures

FM469 La Salle Co. Severe Pavement Failure& Edge drop offs

FM 468 La Salle Co. Severe Alligator Cracking

IH 35 La Salle Co. Newly Developed Pipe Distribution Site north of Cotulla

IH35 West Frontage Road La Salle Co. Severe Pavement Failure at entrance to distribution site

IH 35 West Frontage Road La Salle Co. Severe Pavement Failure

IH 35 West Frontage Road La Salle Co. Severe Rutting & Pavement Failure

Traffic Operations Counties heavily affected by Oil and Gas Industry traffic: Dimmit and La Salle County Dimmit County La Salle County

Traffic along IH-35 Traffic Counts conducted over a four (4) week period, from June to July, along IH-35: Webb & La Salle County IH-35 MM36 IH-35 MM65 IH-35 MM72 IH-35 MM78

Traffic Count Summary Table 2009 AADT Counts 2010 AADT 2012 ADT Counts % Increase/Decrease Counts (2010 2012) MM36: 12,900 MM36: 13,900 MM36: 17,434 24.62 % MM65: 13,000 MM65: 13,100 MM65: 19,575 49.42 % MM72: 11,100 MM72: 12,700 MM72: 23,591 85.75 % MM78: 11,100 MM78: 12,700 MM78: 20,533 61.67 %

Estimated Annual Impacts Original Estimate for FM System: $890 million Additional 20% for heavier trucks Additional 15% for higher road material prices Very conservative: well over $1 billion annually Estimated impact for state s System: $2 billion Extrapolating to local roads Similar number of lane miles Lower original design requirements Estimated impacts well over $1 billion annually

Immediate Expenditure Category 1 District $$ Corpus Christi 10,363,415 Dallas 2,462,160 Fort Worth 9,640,843 Laredo 10,357,710 San Antonio 2,601,019 Yoakum 4,232,000 TOTAL 39,657,147

Solutions FM Roadway Repairs

Solutions FM Roadway Repairs

Traffic Operations (Signals) SH97 at BI-35 Traffic Signal & Pavement Marking Modifications: Added a protective/permissive left turn lane Pavement marking modifications Lane Designation Sign installations 31

Traffic Operations (Signals, etc.) Planned Projects: Flashing Beacons: US83 @ FM2688 US83 @ FM133 (3 Driveways) Acceleration/Deceleration Lanes: US83 @ FM133 (Consultant) Left Turn Lanes: US83 @ FM305 US83 @ FM191

Traffic Operations (Signs) SH97 and FM133 Signs (Dimmit and LaSalle): 16 Truck warning signs 17 Mile Stretch US83 Dimmit & Webb County 40 Mile Stretch (Planning Phase) 33

Intersection Safety Improvements

Intersection Safety Improvements

Truck Routes Cotulla (Planning) Carrizo Springs (Design) Crystal City (Planning) Cotulla Carrizo Springs 36

Recently Constructed Inspection Station

Solutions: TxDOT Internal Task Force Activities Investigating ways to expedite the acceptance of donations by private entities Identifying and sharing Best Practices within TxDOT for addressing identified impacts Developing consistent access/driveway practices

Statewide Energy Sector Task Force Entities Texas Department Of Transportation Texas Department of Public Safety Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Railroad Commission of Texas Texas Department of Motor Vehicles Cities & Counties MOTRAN Texas Oil and Gas Association Texas Farm Bureau America s Natural Gas Alliance Association of Energy Service Companies The Wind Coalition Texas Independent Producers & Royalty Owners Association Texas Motor Transportation Association Texas Pipeline Association Texas Energy Alliance

Center for Transportation Research report conclusions Current situation is not sustainable. Growth in the energy sector contributes to state s economic prosperity, but impacts service life of pavements. Adequate funding sources needed to maintain infrastructure and ensure transportation system can serve energy sector in the future.

Lessons Learned Extensive coordination and cooperation is necessary Some counties have worked with industry to assist with roadway maintenance costs Law Enforcement assistance with additional enforcement is beneficial All players have a vested interest in finding a way to lessen the impacts

Closing Comments 1. This is a critical issue requiring thoughtful planning 2. A cooperative, multi-entity partnership is needed 3. TxDOT has placed this as a top priority 4. More details will be forthcoming as these plans develop

Thank You