Alternative Delivery for Municipal Water & Wastewater Projects in 2012

Similar documents
Project Delivery Selection Matrix If the Project Delivery Approach Fits, Use It

SCADA System Procurement Alternatives

APPENDIX D Forms for Analytical Delivery Decision Approach (Tier 1)

LB 889 The Political Subdivisions Construction Alternatives Act

1/4/2014. Alternative Project Delivery Methods 1. Agenda

Comparison of Conventional and Alternative Project Delivery Methods: What s in an Acronym? PNWS AWWA May, 2013

PROVING OUR PROFESSIONALISM

Risks Associated with Alternative Delivery Methods. Managing Expectations. Presented by Dan Becker, CCM, PMP, CCE

Choosing a Project Delivery Method. A Design-Build Done Right Primer

FACILITIES CONFERENCE

Procurement Guidelines

EJCDC Contract Documents for America s Infrastructure Buy online at

Design Process 101. Michael Barnard, AIA, NCARB. animalsheltering.org/expo #AnimalCareExpo. Copyright

Integrated Project Delivery

Construction Manager as Constructor (CMc) Manual

Request for Qualifications (CM at Risk Contract) State of Ohio Standard Forms and Documents

ALTERNATE FORMS OF PROJECT DELIVERY

Construction Family of Documents

FEATURES FOR SUCCESS DESIGN-BUILD- OPERATE WASTEWATER PROJECTS

Progressive Design-Build

The Greater Toronto Electrical Contractors Association endorses the following CCDC/CCA Documents

Best Practices for Exceeding Project Goals and Reducing Risk on Construction Projects

Lease-Leaseback Project Delivery Method

A Recipe For Success Progressive Design-Build Restores Reliability to a Critical Pump Station

Choosing Delivery Method

PROGRESSIVE DESIGN BUILD WHAT IS IT? AN UPDATE FROM LAST YEAR

Design-Build Highway Projects: A Review of Practices and Experiences Final Report PRC F

Job Order Contracting (JOC) ITB JE Overview August 2016

Construction Manager at Risk Delivery Method

ALTERNATIVE PROJECT DELIVERY METHODS DO THEY SAVE TIME AND MONEY?

Tampa Bay Water is a wholesale water

CCA Contract Forms Type Members Non-Members

A , Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Contractor where the basis of payment is a Stipulated Sum

Request for Qualifications (Design-Build Contract) State of Ohio Standard Forms and Documents

Project Delivery Method

Progressive Design-Build

ConsensusDocs. Catalog. Updated Docs Inside

Fairfax County Government Construction Management At Risk (CMAR)

ConsensusDocs. ConsensusDocs CONTRACTS CATALOG. Updated Docs Inside. ou Ah. ead o f the Cur v. e K

Integrated Project Delivery (IPD) Across the Spectrum of Delivery Systems Who Owns/Controls the Risk? An Owner s Perspective

CM AT RISK VS. DESIGN BID BUILD

How do FIDIC contracts work

AIA Contract Documents

NCHRP 20-07, Task 373 UTILITY COORDINATION USING ALTERNATIVE CONTRACTING METHODS

Lessons Learned from CM-at-Risk and Design Build Projects at Water and Wastewater Treatment Plants. Lawrence H. Hentz Jr., P.E.

SAN DIEGO COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT. SDCCD Design/Build Subcontracting Plan Preparation Workshop

Seattle Public Schools Office of Internal Audit. Internal Audit Report Construction Management Practices

Project phases II. Tendering-constructionoperation

PROJECT EXECUTION STRATEGIES OVERVIEW

Trinity Well Field and Production Facilities Project Management Using CMAR

Carolinas HealthCare System Case Study Collaborate Bid Build (CB 2 ) A Different Approach to Project Delivery

Effective Utility Coordination Practices Using Alternative Contract Methods

International Subawards

Document Bid Form (General Contract) State of Ohio Standard Requirements for Public Facility Construction

Design-Bid-Build Vs Design Build Projects: Performance Assessment of Commercial Projects In Sri Lanka

STUDY SPONSORS Charles Pankow Foundation 223 West Foothill Blvd., 2nd Floor Claremont, California (909)

Project phases II. Tendering-constructionoperation

Critical Construction Industry Trends Influencing Process and Profitability

RFP Restructuring Advisory Committee: Water and Sewer Question and Answer. Question Cut-Off 2/13/17

Progressive Design-Build

ConsensusDOCS are the only standard contract documents endorsed by 23 leading construction associations Construction Contracts Built by Consensus

Stephane Giraud Director Dams & River Works FIDIC Accredited Trainer & Adjudicator Egis Group

Professional Practice 544

Mysore L. Nagaraja, P.E. Chairman

AGENDA. BIM Opportunities for CMMS

Construction Contract Basics

Request for Qualifications (Design-Build Contract) State of Ohio Standard Forms and Documents

Chapter 1, Introduction

PPC2000: Association Of Consultant Architects Standard Form Of Project Partnering Contract

Forsyth County General Services Department Construction Management Division 201 North Chestnut Street Winston-Salem, NC 27101

Planning Construction Procurement. A guide to developing your procurement strategy

ICES Core Cost Engineering Competencies

OFFICE OF PROCUREMENT COOLING TOWER REPLACEMENT, CT BUILDING RFP NO.: RFP OPENING DATE: APRIL 16, 3:00 PM ADDENDUM #4.

MANAGERIAL PROCESS STANDARDIZATION THROUGH ILLUSTRATIVE CASE STUDY

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR AN INTEGRATED PROJECT DELIVERY METHOD UTILIZING DESIGN/BUILD GUARANTEED MAXIMUM PRICE (GMP) SERVICES

Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority. Request for Qualifications Information (RFQI) RFQI No C084. for

1913 Lausanne, Switzerland

Sounds good. What could possibly go wrong? 5/6/2014. Potential Benefits of Design Build. Potential Downsides of Design Build

Member level the optimum standard is given against each activity statement

Contracting Methods and Risk Management

Allowances, Saving, Changes and Contingency

ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS

Single or multi-sourcing model?

Strategic Management and Project Selection

ATTACHMENT A INFRASTRUCTURE FOR SPACEPORT DEVELOPMENT DESIGN-BUILD CONTRACTOR SCOPE OF SERVICES. Table of Contents

Appendix A: Outline of Construction Management Functions /Roles for each phase of the project (source: Construction Management Association of America)

Grabbing the Bull by the Horns: Darigold's Successful Employment of Design-Build Delivery

Understanding the DCAA Audit Process and How to Prepare for Success

Version 1.0. The Contract Management Standard Final Edition. Version 1.0

PROJECT DELIVERY HANDBOOK

S T A N D A R D B I D D I N G D O C U M E N T S. Procurement of Works. Caribbean Development Bank

Construction Contracting Methods. By: Nick Thornsbury Falcon Engineering

MSBA Contractor Roundtable

The documents in the A-Series relate to various forms of agreement between an owner and a contractor.

PPPs Canada s experience Water sector

ConsensusDocs CONTRACTS CATALOG. ConsensusDocs BUILDING A BETTER WAY. See What s New at ConsensusDocs.org

Airport Owners Guide to Project Delivery Systems White Paper Update

Volume II: Cost Proposal and Business Information

Request for Proposals for: Construction Management Services For The ADDISON PUBLIC LIBRARY INTERIOR RENOVATION

6494 Latcha Rd. Walbridge, Ohio v: f: Table of Contents

Transcription:

Alternative Delivery for Municipal Water & Wastewater Projects in 2012 a OWEA 2012 Making a Pass at Going Green Looking Towards the Future June 20, 2012 Dennis Tinkler, P.E.

Agenda Ohio s Methods of Performing Public Construction Ohio Construction Reform (OCR) Alternative Project Delivery Methods Is a Work in Progress Chartered Cities vs. Other Jurisdictions Single-Prime Design/Bid/Build (D/B/B) Design/Build (D/B) project delivery Construction Manager at Risk (CMR) delivery Making a Pass at Going Green ($) Looking Towards the Future General Contractor Led D/B Actions to Move Us Forward 2

Ohio Construction Reform (OCR) June 2011: OCR HB 153 signed by Governor Alternative Project Delivery Methods: Retains multiple-prime Design/Bid/Build (D/B/B) project delivery (not recommended) Retains Construction Manager (CM) as agent delivery Allows Single-Prime D/B/B* Allows Construction Manager at Risk (CMR)* Allows Design/Build (D/B)* Allows for open-book Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP), design-assist, and subcontractor prequalification within D/B and CMR delivery methods *To be discussed further today First changes in Ohio s method of performing public construction in over 134 years! 3

2012: Ohio Construction Reform Work in Progress Check this website for updates on Ohio Construction Reform: http://ocr.ohio.gov/ Allows Single-Prime D/B/B CMR documents final in February 2012 D/B documents final in April 2012 CMR and D/B Standard Requirements for Public Facility documents are a Work in Progress and are expected to be updated for Water/Wastewater projects Go To: http://ocr.ohio.gov/ to sign up for updates, make comments, learn, etc. 4

OCR: Chartered Cities vs. Other Jurisdictions Alternative Delivery Requirements for Ohio Public Water/Wastewater Facilities Chartered Cities OCR not Applicable Ohio Administrative Rules Apply Much flexibility to select best value of Numerous Alternative Delivery Methods Jurisdictions including Non-Chartered Cities, Villages, Townships, Etc. OCR Applies OCR Developed for State Work BUSINESS! Jacob Marley OCR is a Work in Progress and did not generally consider Water/Wastewater Projects 5

OCR: Single-Prime D/B/B Owner Advantages All Parties are Familiar Time-Tested Process Allows Thorough Collaboration/ Input between Owner and Design Engineer Owner Disadvantages Takes Time Linear Process Min. Collaboration between Engineer & Contractor Risks to Owner Relies on Engineer s Estimates Errors and Omissions result in Change Orders (but much less than Multi-Prime) Workable Project Engineer Owner GC Trade Subcontractors Contractual Relationships Working Relationships 6

OCR: CMR ( D/B Lite ) Owner Advantages CMR Pre-Construction Services: Improved Constructability, Pricing, and Possibly Schedule Price Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) During Design Engineer Owner Reduces Project Risk, Contingency, Design Omissions thereby less potential of Change Order Prequalification of Subcontractors may Increase Quality Owner Disadvantages No Single Responsible Party Separate Design/Construction Contracts CMR Engineer and CMR forced marriage Relies on Criteria Engineer for Initial Estimates Trade Subcontractors Complex GMP Process Risk of Agreement Added Costs for CMR Pre-Con Services Contractual Relationships Working Relationships 7

OCR: Design/Build Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them. Ronald Reagan Owner Advantages Single Point of Contact and Single Contract for Performance and Guarantees Owner Disadvantages (Just for Starts) Subcontracting Process is Burdensome: Project Cost Unknown until final Subcontract Packages are designed, bid, and awarded Public Owners will need significant staff to review Subcontract Packages Higher Design Costs Will Delay Project and Add Administrative Costs; Project at Risk to Proceed unless all Sub Packages are designed, bid, and awarded Key Subcontractors are not Members of D/B Team and; therefore, do not provide meaningful innovation Criteria Engineer Owner Design/Builder Trade Subcontractors Contractual Relationships Working Relationships 8

Looking Toward the Future General Contractor Led Design/Build Owner Disadvantages Procurement can be Complex (Evaluated Bid) Criteria Engineer City Limited to Predict what will be Proposed (if Minimal Criteria Design for Complex Project) Price may include Significant Costs to offset Risk (if Minimal Criteria Design for Complex Project) Design/Builder Possible Limited Owner and D/B Team Collaboration Trade Subcontractors Contractual Relationships Working Relationships 9

Looking Toward the Future Most D/B Projects in US are General Contractor Led Design/Build Why Select GC Led Design/Build? Single-Point of Responsibility D/B Team (GC, Engineer, Subs) is Highly Collaborative with Owner Deliver Project Quickly - Problem Solved Costs: Earliest GMP (Lump Sum with Proposal) Low Procurement Costs Competition: Minimize Design/Construction Costs Potential for Maximum Innovation No Contractor Led Change Order Evaluate Proposals: What s Important to Customers? Source: The Water Design/Build Council 10

Looking Toward the Future General Contractor Led Design/Build Delaware, Ohio Upper Olentangy Water Reclamation Center For Example, we ran into Changes in Site Conditions Rather than going to Our own separate Corners and then arguing, delaying, sending letters, holding meetings we solved the problems together as a Team with No Project Delay. As a Team, we completed Value Engineering and Constructability Review to: Improve Facility Operations, Safety, and Reliability Improve Odor Control Design to Reduce Both Construction and Lifecycle Costs Later, Kokosing D/B Team was selected for $10M Sewer D/B Project (Repeat Business) The Team developed Trust and, as a result, delivered more Value for the same Cost to the City 11

Looking Toward the Future Actions to Move Us Forward Take Advantage of Ohio Construction Reform (OCR) After 134 Years, Stop the Craziness Get Rid of Multi-Prime Design/Bid/Build Owners Use Alternative Project Delivery that is most Advantageous to Your Customers Invest Time, Training, and Resources to Learn about all Alternative Delivery Methods Understand Advantages and Disadvantages of Each Alternative Project Delivery Method Recognize that any Alternative Delivery Method can Work with Proper Planning, Execution, and the Right Team Recognize that Owner must have strong leader to follow through with new Alternatives Encourage Ohio Department of Administrative Service to Update D/B Subcontractor Rules Go to http://ocr.ohio.gov/ and submit comments Source: The Water Design/Build Council 12

Questions & Answers a 13

a OWEA 2012 Making a Pass at Going Green Looking Towards the Future June 20, 2012