User Forum Evolution of Network Management Operation Center NMOC. Lenti Giovanni. Head of NOS 24 January 2013

Similar documents
NM Ops and technical evolutions

The Network Strategy Plan. Brian Flynn

Integration of the Airport with the Network Impact on Operational Communications & Procedure between CDM Airport & NMOC

SESAR PJ09 DCB

The SESAR Joint Undertaking is a EU body created by the EU Council (REG 219/2007)

Network Manager User Forum Wrap-up 28/01/2016

SESAR The European ATM Improvement Programme. Regional ANC 2012 Preparatory Symposium Michael STANDAR Moscow March 2012

NMOC Tactical Support to AOs - Survey

ATFM: GETTING STARTED

The AIRPORT CDM. Bahrain October 2015

Network Manager Review

Subject matter and scope

Post-ops performance adjustment process

Local and network impact assessment of ACDM

EUROCONTROL Advanced ATC TWR Implementation Guide

Extending CDM tools. CDM seminar workshop 26NOV18 Jérôme Dufossez Direction générale de l Aviation civile

Episode 3 D FTS on 4D trajectory management and complexity reduction - Experimental Plan EPISODE 3

Performance Based Approach for ASBUs Implementation

A-CDM Benefits & Network Impact Study

Better pricing for ATM?

ASM/ATFCM/ATC PROCESSES AND PROCEDURES WORK PLAN (60 Tasks)

Commission hearing on the preparation for RP3

Version number 2.1. Approved by NMB at its 15 th session on 12 April 2016

Operational Goals WP/12

DISTRIBUTED MULTI-NODAL ATFM SINGAPORE NODE WEEKLY OPERATIONAL TRIAL PLAN (STAGE 1)

Outbound Punctuality Sequencing by Collaborative Departure Planning

Operational Instruction

Airport Collaborative Decision Making Enhancing Airport Efficiency

Network Manager nominated by the European Commission EUROCONTROL. Network Manager Annual Report 2015

SUPERIOR NETWORK SOLUTIONS

Implementation of the Single European Sky and its extension to Third countries

TAM Review and Outlook

Meteorology in Collaborative Decision Making at Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport

EUROCONTROL Training 2019 EUROCONTROL

Two-Speed IT. Bridging the gap between compliance and innovation

Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) Update

Collaborative Decision Making. ATNS CDM Process & Progress

TWELFTH AIR NAVIGATION CONFERENCE

FAA/Industry Collaborative Weather Rerouting Workshop. TFM Focus Area Discussion Summaries April 10-11, 2001

Strategic Planning in Air Traffic Control as a Multi-Objective Stochastic Optimization Problem

Co-operative Air Traffic Management Airport Centered Planning

Implementation of the Air Traffic Flow Management (ATFM) Monitoring the ATFM implementation in the Peruvian State. (Presented by Peru) SUMMARY

THE ROADMAP FOR DELIVERING HIGH PERFORMING AVIATION FOR EUROPE. European ATM Master Plan

NCLB AIM Workshop Cairo,11-13 September 2017 SWIM. IATA s Perspective

FAA Office of. Environment and Energy Operations Research Projects. Federal Aviation Administration

SESSION 7A SESAR INNOVATIONS. Peter Hotham Chief of Technology & Innovation

THE FUTURE OF AIR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT SAFE & EFFICIENT. An Update on SESAR. Prof. Dr. Peter Hecker Member of the Scientific Committee

Collaborative Decision Making Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport

SESAR Deployment Programme

DEPLOYMENT PROGRAMME Mai 2017 LET S DELIVER TOGETHER

INTERNATIONAL VOLCANIC ASH TASK FORCE (IVATF)

A 4D Flight Profile Server And Probability-Based 4D Weather Objects

SESAR: a European initiative for an enhanced ATM system

Single European Sky Interoperability Regulation

Improving Traffic Flow Optimization and Demand Management

NextGen ATM Concept of Operations: ASAS-Reliant

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR ENERGY AND TRANSPORT MANDATE TO CEN/CENELEC/ETSI FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF

SESAR. M. STANDAR Chief Strategy & External Affairs. Forsknings-och innovationsdagen inom luftfartsområdet Stockholm, March 23 rd, 2017

Military Impact assessment of ATM Master Plan Deployment Packages and Deployment Scenarios

DCB/ASM Scenario Step1 System Definition Final

Preliminary Cost-Benefit Analysis

Assessing ATM performance with simulation and optimisation tools: The APACHE Project

Manual on Collaborative Air Traffic Flow Management

SESAR European ATM Master Plan & SESAR2020

Defining benefits of Dynamic Data Exchange

SESAR & NextGen Working together for Aviation Interoperability

Climate optimised aircraft trajectories based on advanced MET service for sustainable aviation

NORTH EUROPEAN FUNCTIONAL AIRSPACE BLOCK NEFAB Feasibility Study. Cost Benefit Analysis v NEFAB CBA Page 1 of 57

Analysis-Oriented View for Cross-Border ATFM

EPISODE 3. Episode 3 paves the way for SESAR validation

Coordinated Arrival Departure Management

Master Plan edition 2

The future of Air Traffic Management

Information as a Business Asset Expressing the value of Information and Services in Business Models

The Search for Shared Situational Awareness for Enhanced Collaboration in Airport Systems

Capacity Planning and Assessment Additional considerations

ANS performance review in Europe

Final Project Report. Abstract. Document information

Final Project Report. Abstract. Document information

Transport Systems Catapult An Overview. Yolande Herbath Business Development Manager

Final Project Report. Abstract. Document information

COFLIGHT AS A SERVICE

Airport Collaborative Decision Making (A-CDM) Safety Case Guidance Material

Practical application to deliver Solutions. Presented to: ATIEC 2016 By: Bretton Wells Date: 21 September 2016

Boosting your ATM business with NM B2B SWIM Services

ICB Industry Consultation Body A high level vision for achieving the Single European Sky

A CDM Standard to Guide Implementation in Europe

Coordinated Capacity and Demand Management in the European Core Area

Flight Path 2050: 90% of travelers within Europe are able to complete their journey, door to door within 4 hours

The Effect of a Highly Automated Environment on Human Behaviour

SESAR Release 2 RESULTS

SUPPORTING GLOBAL HARMONISATION AND. Michael Standar, SESAR JU Chief Strategy & External Affairs

SESAR development and deployment

International Civil Aviation Organization. Airport Collaborative Decision Making (A CDM) Saulo Da Silva

CDM Airline and Handler Meeting December 20th, Welcome!

Manual on Collaborative Air Traffic Flow Management

Episode 3 D WP4 Contribution Validation Strategy. Single European Sky Implementation support through Validation. Document information.

Implementation of the Dynamic Capacity Management in a high density area Project Number Project Manager

ATMGE/ 21 Budapest, September Agenda Item 2 - ASBU Monitoring and Reporting. Ana Paula FRANGOLHO EUROCONTROL EUROCONTROL

Civil-military ATM performance based partnership

Transcription:

User Forum 2013 Evolution of Network Management Operation Center NMOC Lenti Giovanni Head of NOS 24 January 2013

SESAR: the performance targets A future European ATM system than can: Enable a 3-fold traffic increase in movements above 2006 levels whilst reducing delays Improve Safety Performance by a factor of 10 Enable a 10% reduction in the environmental effects per flight Reduce ATM unit costs to airspace users by at least 50%. Evolution of the NMOC 2

Contribution of NMOC Focus on performance areas for which there are network targets and a clear NM responsibility to contribute: Environment: Network Management contribution to flight efficiency Capacity: NM contribution to improve average en-route ATFM delay - NMOC support to ANSPs to deliver performance (considering AOs needs). Capacity plans ensure annual Network delay target for each year (RP1) is achieved - NMOC deliver operational benefits = 10% improvement on top of ANSP plans Evolution of the NMOC 3

Capacity NMOC objectives en-route - 1 Weekend traffic 16% less than in weekdays but delays 23% higher: weekend delays reduced by 120,000 per year Action: better usage ATFCM measures (incl. scenarios), MCP, sector configuration management, network effect, CDM Reduce percentage of flights delayed >30 from 1,51% (2011) to 1% (0,87 in 2012) Action: Slot list close monitor and manual interventions on individual penalties, RRPs Effective delay reduction due to accepted reroute proposals (RRPs) 3% daily en-route delay: - 615 per day reduction in 2011 = 2,0% daily en-route network delay - 524 per day reduction in 2012 = 3,1% daily en-route network delay Evolution of the NMOC 4

Capacity NMOC objectives en-route - 2 Reduce the number of ATFCM regulations producing less than 200 to less than 20 per day (25 regs/day in 2011, 17/day in 2012) saving 1,000 delay per day. Action: promote STAM, occupancy counts, implement and expand MCP, support to FMPs on ATFCM knowledge Delay sharing procedure anticipated to reduce at least 25% delay for each event - reduce overall delay by 50,000 /year. Action: FMPs bilateral agreement. Expand to day of operations Evolution of the NMOC 5

Publicity on MCP (Mandatory Cherry Picking) - 1 New measure replacing traditional ATFCM regulation caused by short peaks in en-route sectors Safety: same effect of a traditional regulation CTOT issued only for a limited number of flights Allows as many flights as possible to operate in accordance with their time schedule (no CTOT) Reduces Network delay and number of regs giving delay below 200 Evolution of the NMOC 6

Publicity on Mandatory Cherry Picking (MCP) - 2 Prototype MCP procedure tested 3 days in real time ops with EDYY. 7 MCP replaced 7 standard traditional regulations With 7 standard regulations: - 581 flights subject to CTOT - Overall delay estimated 1,760 With 7 MCP: - 551 flights did not receive CTOT (no departure time constraint) - 30 flights received CTOT with overall delay 268 - delay saving 1,500 - Effective AOs cost saving Evolution of the NMOC 7

Airport Operations NMOC objectives Reduce delays by 5% (average) at 5 targeted airports (all delay reasons) e.g. CARA (Collaborative Arrivals Regulation Avoidance) at LOWW: Overall delay 2010: 329,999 2011: 229,269 2012: 147,745 Reduce small airport delays New procedures, slot list management, CDM exclusions. Support FMPs and TWRs in decisional process for a better usage of ATFCM measures applied due weather and disruptions. Support A-CDM implementation Evolution of the NMOC 8

IFPS evolution youth potion for an antiquated system? Single area of responsibility: one IFPS system processing all messages (invalid FPLs shared across the two Units). Benefit: - Easier management of human resources > reduced costs - Single phone help desk > easier life for AOs New FPL elements: Taxi-time, Take-off weight, SID/STAR, time over points along the route. Benefit: - Decreased invalid FPLs, more consistent flight trajectory Evolution of the NMOC 9

Disruption/Crisis management NMOC providing a timely response to any type (planned or unplanned) of Network disruption or crisis Acting as focal point for coordination Sharing/providing all relevant info to all stakeholders via NOP, contributing to a common situational awareness Elaborate and implement agreed mitigation measures Evolution of the NMOC 10

NMOC (Ops Room) reorganization Ops personnel overall number adapted to Network requirements Cross domain validations Merging key Network activities Dedicated Teams managing the Network Benefits Enhanced network operations procedures Improved integration of planning and operations Provide flexibility (adapting staffing to daily needs) Reduced costs Evolution of the NMOC 11

Doubts? Questions? Thank You! Evolution of the NMOC 12