Side Stream Nutrient Considera6ons and Nutrient Harves6ng

Similar documents
Defining the Benefits of Harvesting Phosphorus from Dewatering Filtrate

WWTP Side Stream Treatment of Nutrients Considerations for City of Raleigh s Bioenergy Recovery Project. Erika L. Bailey, PE, City of Raleigh

Sidestream Treatment Overview. Kam Law, P.E. Beverley Stinson, Ph.D.

Preparing for Nutrient Removal at Your Treatment Plant

Post-Aerobic Digester with Bioaugmentation Pilot Study City of Meridian, ID WWTP PNCWA 2010

Advances in Point Source Nitrogen Removal Technologies: Transitioning from Version 1.0 to 3.0

Shortcut Biological Nitrogen Removal for sustainable wastewater treatment and achieving energy neutrality

A Battle to Be the Best: A Comparison of Two Powerful Sidestream Treatment Technologies: Post Aerobic Digestion and Anammox

JTAC Presentation May 18, Nutrient Removal Process Fundamentals and Operation

THE DEMON ANAMMOX PROCESS: RESOURCE SAVINGS THROUGH SIDE STREAM TREATMENT, AND THE STEPS TOWARDS AN ENERGY NEUTRAL WWTP PRESENTED AT: NC AWWA-WEA 97

Presentation Outline

Andrea Nifong, World Water Works (formerly HRSD) Stephanie Klaus, VT & HRSD

Innovations in Nitrogen and Phosphorus Removal

Applying Extractive Nutrient Recovery for Managing Phosphorus in Sidestreams and Biosolids

We Know Water. AnoxKaldnes. Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor (MBBR) Integrated Fixed-Film Activated Sludge (IFAS) and ANITA Mox Deammonification

Deammonification for Cost-Effective Sidestream Treatment

Sustainable Approaches to Sidestream Nutrient Removal and Recovery

At the Mercy of the Process Impacts of Nitrogen Removal Performance on WWTP Disinfection

A Roadmap for Smarter Nutrient Management in a Carbon and Energy Constrained World. Samuel Jeyanayagam, PhD, PE, BCEE

Technologies for Sustainable Wastewater Treatment. Nitrogen Removal from Sludge Dewatering Liquor

Innovative Phosphorus Control to Turn Struvite Headaches into Increase Revenue. Peter Schauer, Rob Baur, Brett Laney PNCWA 2010

OWEA Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition Upgrading WRFs for Biological Nutrient Removal. June 25, 2015

The following biological nutrient removal processes were evaluated in detail in the 2016 Liquid Processing Facilities Plan:

CE421/521 Environmental Biotechnology. Nitrogen and Phosphorus Cycles Lecture Tim Ellis

Nitrogen and Phosphorus Harvesting and Reuse

2015 Spring Conference

AMPC Wastewater Management Fact Sheet Series Page 1

AMPC Wastewater Management Fact Sheet Series Page 1

Filtrate Treatment Facility Update

Mainstream ANITA Mox Pilot Testing at Los Angeles County Joint Water Pollution Control Plant. Meg Hollowed Veolia Water Technologies

The ANITA Range Sustainable and cost-effective solutions for high-ammonia loaded effluents

NITROGEN REMOVAL GRANT WEAVER, PE & WWTP OPERATOR PRESIDENT THE WATER PLANET COMPANY. Create Optimal Habitats

General Operational Considerations in Nutrient and Wet Weather Flow Management for Wastewater Treatment Facilities Part II

RE ENGINEERING O&M PRACTICES TO GET NITROGEN & PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL WITHOUT FACILITY UPGRADES

CTB3365x Introduction to Water Treatment

WASSTRIP (Waste Activated Sludge. Stripping to Remove Internal. Phosphorus) complements Ostara s. Pearl nutrient recovery process in

We Know Water. AnoxKaldnes. Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor (MBBR) Integrated Fixed-Film Activated Sludge (IFAS) and ANITA Mox Deammonification

NITROGEN AND PHOSPHORUS-RICH SIDESTREAMS: MANAGING THE NUTRIENT MERRY-GO-ROUND

Integrated Activated Sludge and Biosolids Treatment to Conserve Energy & Waste Solids Disposal

ANITA Mox MBBR. Simon Piveteau, M. Christensson, B. Bigot, R. Lemaire, L. Rohold, B. Nussbaum, J. Ochoa

Carbon Redirection and its Role in Energy Optimization at Water Resource Recovery Facilities

STRUVITE HARVESTING: A UTILITY S PERSPECTIVE

FIRST APPLICATION OF THE BABE PROCESS AT S-HERTOGENBOSCH WWTP. Pettelaarpark 70, PO Box GA, s-hertogenbosch, The Netherlands

Holistic Approach to Plant Optimization for Biosolids Management

Biological Phosphorus Removal Technology. Presented by: Eugene Laschinger, P.E.

SECTION 8.0 NEWPCC SECOND PRIORITY CONTROL ALTERNATIVES

Review of WEFTEC 2016 Challenge & Overview of 2017 Event. Malcolm Fabiyi, PhD, MBA Spencer Snowling, PhD. P.Eng

AnoxKaldnes. Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor (MBBR) and Integrated Fixed-Film Activated Sludge (IFAS)

Developments in Mainstream Deammonification and Nitrite Shunt Haydée De Clippeleir

Masses at Massillon: IFAS for Industrial Loads and Nutrient Removal

Developments in Mainstream Deammonification and Nitrite Shunt Haydée De Clippeleir

Altoona Westerly Wastewater Treatment Facility BNR Conversion with Wet Weather Accommodation

Contents General Information Abbreviations and Acronyms Chapter 1 Wastewater Treatment and the Development of Activated Sludge

Waste Water Treatment Plant Overview and Tour

Activated Sludge Process Control: Nitrification

Nutrient Removal Optimization at the Fairview WWTP

FY17 Technical Survey of Nitrogen Removal Alternatives for the Deer Island Treatment Plant

orld water works Clean Water and Energy from Wastewater IDEAL MBBR IDEAL IFAS

4 Angles. Pilot-scale Evaluation of AirPrex for Phosphorus Management. Innovation Program Phosphorus Initiative JTAC 4/22/2017

Performance Evaluation of the Moores Creek Advanced Water Resource Recovery Facility

20 Years of Nutrient Removal City of Beloit

ISAM INTEGRATED SURGE ANOXIC MIX

Energy Savings Through Denitrification

Operation and Control of Multiple BNR Processes in One WWTP

Short-Cut Nitrogen Removal: A State of the Art Review

Dewatering Optimization Near-Term Savings and Long-Term Capital Planning

An Innovative Approach to Retrofitting for Nitrogen Removal

Managing the Risk of Embracing Disruptive Technology

Secondary Treatment Process Control

OCTOBER 31, NAMI Environmental Conference BEST PRACTICES: IMPROVING WW SYSTEMS

WASTEWATER DEPARTMENT. Bentonville Wastewater Treatment Plant Facts:

MBBR Technology: - A cost effective solution for upgrading existing Waste water Treatment Works. Bruno Bigot

HOW TO SELECT SRT. SRT is selected based on the following treatment requirements/objectives:

CIE4485 Wastewater Treatment

WASTEWATER 101 Fo r MOWA

PLANNING FOR NUTRIENT REMOVAL: WHAT STEPS CAN WE BE TAKING NOW?

Treatment Optimization: What s

COMPARISON OF SBR AND CONTINUOUS FLOW ACTIVATED SLUDGE FOR NUTRIENT REMOVAL

Presenters: Rodrigo Pena-Lang, PE (D&B Engineers), Magdalena Gasior, PE (D&B Engineers) and Paul D. Smith, PE (NYCDEP)

So You ve Removed Your Phosphorus? Now What? JTAC Luncheon April 9 th, 2014

AquaPASS. Aqua MixAir System. Phase Separator. System Features and Advantages. Anaerobic. Staged Aeration. Pre-Anoxic.

Current Trends in Biosolids Management & Treatment

Wet Weather and Advanced Treatment: Procurement Strategies to Secure the Right Technology

In 2010, municipal wastewater treatment facilities

Global Leaders in Biological Wastewater Treatment

AMMONIACAL NITROGEN REMOVAL FROM SLUDGE LIQUORS OPERATIONAL EXPERIENCE WITH THE DEMON PROCESS

Waste water treatment

NUTRIENT REMOVAL FROM ANAEROBIC DIGESTER SIDE-STREAM AT THE BLUE PLAINS AWTP Overlook Ave., SW, Washington, DC 20032

Appendix D JWPCP Background and NDN

Making Your Plant Denitrify

Wastewater Process Ephemeralization -

Wastewater Nitrogen Characteristics, Treatment and Removal Options. Bob Smith, Orenco Systems, Inc. GEC 2013

PILOT SCALE TESTS OF A UNIQUE APPROACH FOR BNR UPGRADE OF A SHORT SRT HIGH PURITY OXYGEN SYSTEM AT PIMA COUNTY, AZ

Energy Efficient Wastewater Treatment. Emily Gonthier & Jennifer Lawrence April 30, 2018

Meeting SB1 Requirements and TP Removal Fundamentals

SIMPLE and FLEXIBLE ENERGY SAVINGS And PERFORMANCE ENHANCEMENT for OXIDATION DITCH UPGRADES

Proprietary AquaTron technology incorporates three (3) innovative features that increase its efficiency and reduces cost:

BEING GOOD STEWARDS: IMPROVING EFFLUENT QUALITY ON A BARRIER ISLAND. 1.0 Executive Summary

Perspectives on Wastewater as a Resource

Transcription:

Side Stream Nutrient Considera6ons and Nutrient Harves6ng Eric Spargimino, PE CDM Smith October 23, 2014

High Strength Side Streams Drivers Permit, Cost to treat, O&M and equipment Nitrogen Treatment AlternaFves Phosphorus Treatment AlternaFves Treat or Harvest Summary and Conclusions Agenda

Side Stream CharacterizaFon Primary Sludge Thickening Return Secondary Sludge Thickening Return Dewatering Return Digestate Return TSS - Conc., mg/l 557 444 330 2000 BOD - Conc., mg/l 300 300 200 50 Ammonia - Conc., mg NH3- N/L Total Phosphorus - Conc., mg TP/L 15 15 500 1000 13 200 Predict BOD and Ammonia from typical wastewater (MOP8) and CDM Smith Clients

Nitrogen Side Stream Treatment OpFons Non- proprietary EqualizaFon High Rate Nitrifying AcFvated Sludge Process Proprietary InNitri ( Inexpensive NitrificaFon ) SHARON ( Single Reactor High AcFvity Ammonia Removal Over Nitrite ) Process AOx- DN ( Ammonia OxidaFon- DenitrificaFon Over Nitrite ) similar to SHARON Anammox ( Anaerobic Ammonium OxidaFon ) Process DEMON (suspended growth) ANITA Mox (fixed film) Other Nitrogen Removal Processes AT- 3 ( AeraFon Tank 3, NYCDEP 26th Ward) BABE ( Bio- AugmentaFon Batch Enhanced ) CaRRB ( Centrate and RAS ReaeraFon Basin )

NitrificaFon NH + 4 + 1.5O 2 - NO 2 + 2H + + H 2 O NO - 2 + ½ O 2 - NO 3

Side Stream Process AlternaFves Side Stream Process EqualizaFon Aerated EqualizaFon High rate nitrifying acfvated sludge Descrip6on EQ flow over 24 hr period, or only at night; need mixing Aerate the centrate only; At 1 day SRT, should get most ammonia removed AcFvated sludge plant for dewatering Side Stream (aerafon tank and clarifier); Can be done in an SBR InNitri (m 2 t technologies) Treats Side Stream in a separate acfvated sludge system (with clarifier), produces an enriched populafon of nitrifying bacteria, which is used to seed the mainstream reactor, no denite step

Side Stream Process AlternaFves Side Stream Process Descrip6on Advantages Disadvantages EqualizaFon EQ flow over 24 hr period, or only at night; need mixing Easy, low cost solufon Distributes load throughout day Load sfll treated in main process Large storage tank needed Aerated EqualizaFon Aerate the centrate only; At 1 day SRT, should get most ammonia removed Thousand Oaks example achieve 50% ammonia removal More equipment and operafonal costs than EQ only No denite of Side Stream High rate nitrifying acfvated sludge AcFvated sludge plant for dewatering Side Stream (aerafon tank and clarifier); Can be done in an SBR Non- proprietary Uses high temp of dewatering Side Stream Dallas example - ~800 mg/l ammonia down to <10 mg/l with 3 day SRT; saved $400K & double equipment cost compared with SHARON Separate Side Stream process No denite of Side Stream InNitri (m 2 t technologies) Treats Side Stream in a separate acfvated sludge system (with clarifier), produces an enriched populafon of nitrifying bacteria, which is used to seed the mainstream reactor, no denite step Increased capacity of mainstream nitrificafon process Uses high temp of dewatering Side Stream to speed reacfon No denite of Side Stream Alkalinity needed Poor sekling of Side Stream à hard to maintain SRT

Side Stream Process AlternaFves SHARON / Annamox Side Stream Process SHARON (m 2 t technologies) AOx- DN (f.r.mahony &associates, inc.) DEMON (World Water Works) ANITA Mox (Kruger, Inc.) SHARON / Anammox (m 2 t technologies) Descrip6on Nitrifies ammonia to nitrite then reduces the nitrite to nitrogen gas in a confnuous- flow, completely mixed reactor without sludge recycle at the temperature of centrate Similar to SHARON in fixed film reactor; controls nitrificafon by intermikently aerafng the reactor; at high temp of centrate In Anammox, nitrite and ammonia are converted to nitrogen gas. Batch operafon, suspended growth, two reactors (Min.), one flow EQ tank Anammox in confnuous flow reactor, Fixed Film Growth (MBBR) or combined Fixed Film and Suspended Growth (IFAS) Anammox downstream of SHARON, with SHARON operated to provide approximately equal parts of ammonia and nitrite

Side Stream Process AlternaFves SHARON / Annamox Side Stream Process Descrip6on Advantages Disadvantages SHARON (m 2 t technologies) Nitrifies ammonia to nitrite then reduces the nitrite to nitrogen gas in a confnuous- flow, completely mixed reactor without sludge recycle at the temperature of centrate Decrease nitrogen load to mainstream Decrease oxygen & carbon AddiFonal process to maintain Proprietary, can be costly AOx- DN (f.r.mahony &associates, inc.) Similar to SHARON in fixed film reactor; controls nitrificafon by intermikently aerafng the reactor; at high temp of centrate Decrease nitrogen load to mainstream Decrease oxygen & carbon AddiFonal process to maintain Proprietary, can be costly DEMON (World Water Works) In Anammox, nitrite and ammonia are converted to nitrogen gas. Batch operafon, suspended growth, two reactors (Min.), one flow EQ tank Decrease nitrogen load to mainstream Decrease oxygen & carbon Proprietary, can be costly ANITA Mox (Kruger, Inc.) Anammox in confnuous flow reactor, Fixed Film Growth (MBBR) or combined Fixed Film and Suspended Growth (IFAS) Decrease nitrogen load to mainstream Decrease oxygen & carbon Proprietary, can be costly SHARON / Anammox (m 2 t technologies) Anammox downstream of SHARON, with SHARON operated to provide approximately equal parts of ammonia and nitrite Decreases oxygen use by ~63% compared to convenfonal nitrificafon Does not consume COD AddiFonal process to maintain Heat generated by Anammox, may need cooling

Biological Nitrogen Removal Nitrifica6on Aerobic (with oxygen) Autotrophs (AOBs and NOBs) Nitrate Carbon Denitrifica6on Anoxic (no oxygen) Heterotrophs Oxygen Nitrite Nitrite Carbon Oxygen Alkalinity Ammonia Nitrogen gas, Carbon dioxide Alkalinity

SHARON Process Short- cuts NitrificaFon to Reduce Energy and Carbon Requirements Nitrifica6on Aerobic (with oxygen) Autotrophs (AOBs and NOBs) Nitrate Carbon Denitrifica6on Anoxic (no oxygen) Heterotrophs Oxygen Nitrite Nitrite Carbon Oxygen Alkalinity Ammonia SHARON High temp Nitrogen gas, Carbon dioxide Alkalinity

Anammox Process Achieves Shortest Route to Remove Nitrogen at Low OperaFng Cost (low oxygen, no carbon) Nitrifica6on Aerobic (with oxygen) Autotrophs (AOBs and NOBs) Nitrate Carbon Denitrifica6on Anoxic (no oxygen) Heterotrophs Oxygen Nitrite Nitrite Carbon Oxygen Alkalinity Ammonia Anammox Autotrophs (anammox bacteria) Nitrogen gas, Carbon dioxide Alkalinity

Side Stream Process Flow SchemaFcs Equalization Side Stream EQ Tank. To Headworks High Rate Nitrifying Activated Sludge Air Lime Side Stream EQ Tank. Nitrification NO 3 - To Headworks To WML thickening SHARON /Anammox Air Methanol Side Stream Nitrification to Denitrification to N EQ Tank. 2 NO 2 Gas To Headworks

Side Stream Process AlternaFves - Other Side Stream Process Descrip6on AT- 3 ( AeraFon Tank 3, NYCDEP 26th Ward) BABE ( Bio- AugmentaFon Batch Enhanced ) CaRRB ( Centrate and RAS ReaeraFon Basin ) Treats Side Stream in a separate acfvated sludge system, plug flow Divert porfon mainstream RAS and blend with Side Stream to feed into reactor, usually SBR Side Stream (centrate) and RAS in bioreactor with aerafon for nitrificafon before return to mainstream

Side Stream Process AlternaFves - Other Side Stream Process Descrip6on Advantages Disadvantages AT- 3 ( AeraFon Tank 3, NYCDEP 26th Ward) Treats Side Stream in a separate acfvated sludge system, plug flow Increased capacity of mainstream nitrificafon process Limited full- scale installafons No denite of Side Stream BABE ( Bio- AugmentaFon Batch Enhanced ) Divert porfon mainstream RAS and blend with Side Stream to feed into reactor, usually SBR Sekles beker than InNitri because of RAS addifon Can achieve some denite with SBR Limited full- scale installafons AddiFonal process to maintain CaRRB ( Centrate and RAS ReaeraFon Basin ) Side Stream (centrate) and RAS in bioreactor with aerafon for nitrificafon before return to mainstream Reduced load to mainstream process Can provide biomass storage for wet weather AddiFonal process to maintain Ostara PEARL TM Nutrient Recycling Controlled struvite precipitafon for phosphorus & ammonia removal Produces struvite, a product that can be sold P benefit, not much N benefit Costly

Faces of Struvite 10-in Digested Solids Lines

Faces of Struvite

Drivers for HarvesFng Phosphorus Struvite Chemical and Cleaning Costs Increasing $170,000/yr and growing at Des Moines $750,000/yr and growing at Deer Island (Ferric only) PotenFal Effluent Nutrient PotenFal RestricFons on Land Applied P at Des Moines

Phosphorus Side Stream Treatment OpFons Non- proprietary Biological Chemical iron salts Alum ph adjustment Carbon Dioxide InjecFon Proprietary Chemical AddiFon Struvout 2520 Harvest DHV Crystalactor Paques Phosphaq CNP - Airprex MulFform Harvest Ostara PEARL TM

Influent 72 MGD 5,200 ppd (8.6 mg/l) Plant Phosphorus Balance Liquid Treatment Process Primary Secondary Effluent 3,400 ppd (5.6 mg/l) Side Stream 3,600 ppd Percent of influent: 69% Typical: 20-30% Solids Treatment Process Blended Sludge 5,600 ppd Biosolids 2,900 ppd Special Waste 1,100 ppd (1.9 mg/l eq.)

Influent 5,200 ppd (8.6 mg/l) Proposed Solu6on Side Stream Nutrient Removal Liquid Treatment Process Primary Secondary Effluent 1 mg/l P Struvite Side Stream Treatment Solids Treatment Process Biosolids 2,500 ppd P Special Waste 1,100 ppd (1.9 mg/l eq.)

Proposed SoluFon Side Stream Nutrient Removal Crystalactor

Mg 2+ +NH 4+ + PO 4 3- + 6 H 2 O MgNH 4 PO 4 6H 2 O struvite 3Fe 2+ +2 PO 4 3- Fe 3 (PO 4 ) 2 8 H 2 O vivianite Source: MulFform Harvest

DHV - Crystalactor

Paques PHOSPAQ Phosphaq s market: >100kg P/d (220 lb P/d) Minimum 50 mg/l PO4- P Minimum 200 mg/l NH4- N

SOURCE: YouTube PHOSPAQ Struvite Product

CNP AirPrex Reduce Polymer by up to 30% Reduce Disposal Costs by up to 20% Reduce Phosphorus Recycle Load by up to 90% Reduce Maintenance Costs by up to 50% Increase Revenue up to 10% from Fertilizer

MulFform Harvest

Ostara Pearl Process

Crystal Green FerFlizer (Photo removed to reduce file size.)

WASSTRIP TM recommended to protect digester

Struvite PrevenFon Electrical Cell Lysis to Aid Struvite Harves6ng

Summary Compared several nitrogen and phosphorus side stream treatment alternafves Evaluated several struvite recovery technologies spanning perceived range from low- to high- tech Proposed further study with non Bio- P plants and implicafons of Iron Salt addifon.

Contact InformaFon: SpargiminoEM@cdmsmith.com QuesFons