EBERHARDT SCHOOL OF BUSINESS BusinessForecasting Center 12 Lodi REGIONAL

Similar documents
Economic Impact of Agriculture and Agribusiness in Miami-Dade County, Florida

The Measure of California Agriculture, 2006 CHAPTER FIVE AGRICULTURE S ROLE IN THE ECONOMY

Kansas. Estimated Economic Impact of Agriculture, Food, and Food Processing Sectors 08/01/2017

Agriculture in Marion, Polk, and Yamhill Counties

A Retrospective Estimate of the Economic Impacts of Reduced Water Supplies to the San Joaquin Valley in 2009

The Economic Importance of New Jersey s Food System in 2002

Economic Impact Study of Agriculture-Related Industries

2015 AGRICULTURAL WORKFORCE. Agriculture economy Employment and earnings Agriculture labor market H-2A and prevailing wages Common practices

Economic Contribution of the Agriculture Industry in New Hampshire. Calendar Year Prepared for New Hampshire Department of Agriculture

Contribution of Agribusiness to the Magic Valley Economy, 2010

Interim Update on the Economic Impact of Michigan s Agri-Food and Agri-Energy System

Agriculture and Food Processing in Washington State Economic Impacts and Importance of Water

Contribution of Agribusiness to the Idaho Economy, 2013

Estimated Economic Impact of Agriculture, Food, and Food Processing Sectors 9/8/2016

There is much debate on the size and importance of

Economic Impacts of Connecticut s Agricultural Industry Update 2015

Contribution of Agribusiness to the Idaho Economy, 2011

Characterizing U.S. Fruit and Vegetable Production

The Economic Importance of Food and Fiber

Contribution of Agribusiness to the Magic Valley Economy, 2013

The Iowa Pork Industry 2008: Patterns and Economic Importance by Daniel Otto and John Lawrence 1

The Economic Contributions of Agriculture in New York State (2014)

Examining Ag & Food Systems in New York State

The Economic Importance of Food and Fiber

STATISTICAL PROFILE OF HALIFAX AND HANTS COUNTIES. Prepared By: Nova Scotia Federation of Agriculture

Economic Contributions of Agriculture, Natural Resources, and Food Industries in Florida in

The Economic Importance of Food and Fiber

Input-output models for agriculture and agri-food industries

Cultivating Trade: The Economic Impact of Indiana s Agricultural Exports

Economic Contribution of Maine s Food Industry

Crossroads Resource Center

Economics of California Farm Labor: The Supply, Demand and Regulatory Situation. January 12, 2017 Woodland

POLICY ANALYSIS REPORT

Economic Contribution of Proposed South St. Paul Union Pacific Rail Yard Improvements

Contribution of Agriculture to Oklahoma s Economy: 2015

EXTENSION. The Economic Impact of a Commercial Cattle Operation in a Rural Nebraska County. Key Findings EC856

PRODUCT CENTER For Agriculture and Natural Resources Room 80 Agriculture Hall, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI (517)

Agriculture and Oregon's Economy

ECONOMIC EMERGENCY PROGRAM Economic Impact of Lost Poultry Processing Jobs in Faribault, Minnesota

USING IMPLAN TO ASSESS LOCAL ECONOMIC IMPACTS. David Mulkey and Alan W. Hodges. Introduction 1

A Comparison of Contributions to the Canadian Economy of Key Bulk Commodity Shippers and Rail Freight Carriers

Economic Contribution of Projects Leveraged with AURI Assistance: Fiscal Years

CONTRIBUTION OF THE ETHANOL INDUSTRY TO THE ECONOMY OF THE UNITED STATES

Economic Contribution of Idaho Agribusiness

ECONOMIC. Impact of Arkansas Agriculture

Economic Impacts of the. Torrance Refinery. August Torrance Refining Company LLC. Prepared For:

THIS IS AN UPDATE OF A PREVIOUS STUDY. This study, like its 1996

inside 3 Arkansas economy is on solid ground Arkansas counts on agriculture Total impact Bringing in the harvest The Value Added advantage

Agricultural and California Economy

Agriculture Overview. Stephen Gran Manager Agriculture Industry Development Hillsborough County Economic Development Department

AN ECONOMIC DESCRIPTION OF THE AGRICULTURAL SECTOR IN PERSHING COUNTY

The Economic Impact of California Specialty Crops A Regional Perspective. Lynn Hamilton 1 Cal Poly San Luis Obispo, Department of Agribusiness

Central California. C enter yourself!

Regional Competitive Industry Analysis

ESTIMATED ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF THE CATTLE RANCHING AND FARMING SECTOR ON THE ELKO COUNTY ECONOMY

How Agriculture Contributes To Oregon's Economy

Economic Impact of the Maine Food System and Farm Vitality Policy Implications

STATISTICAL PROFILE OF COLCHESTER COUNTY. Prepared By: Nova Scotia Federation of Agriculture

2012 Farm Outlook. Highlights

Measuring the Effect of Louisiana Agriculture on the State Economy Through Multiplier and Impact Analysis

Crossroads Resource Center

Prepared by: Agricultural Marketing Services Division Minnesota Department of Agriculture 90 West Plato Boulevard St.

Regional Competitive Industry Analysis

Food & Beverage Manufacturing in Central California

AGRICULTURE Statistics

The University of Georgia

The Economic Impact of Ethanol Production in Hall County

ECONOMIC EMERGENCY REPORT Economic Impact of a Fire on Main Street in Melrose, Minnesota

Economic Contribution of the Agbioscience Industry: Northeast Minnesota

Economic Impacts from Agricultural Production in Arizona

The Economic Performance of Food-Manufacturing Industries in Idaho

Yolo County Workforce Innovation Board Industry Clusters of Opportunity

Economic Contribution of Agriculture to Polk County s Economy

Economic Contribution of the U.S. Lead Battery Industry

CONTRIBUTION OF THE ETHANOL INDUSTRY TO THE ECONOMY OF THE UNITED STATES

Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education. North Central Region SARE. Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education

Section 2 - Agricultural Production

Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Fort Collins, CO

The Economic Impact of the Ophthalmic Goods Manufacturing Industry on the Southern California Economy

Economic Contribution of the Agbioscience Industry: Central Minnesota

Economic Contributions of Agriculture, Natural Resources and Food Industries in Polk County, Florida

Presidents Forum of the Distilled Spirits Industry Economic Impact Study. Methodology and Documentation Prepared for:

Economic Impact Report

Saskatchewan remains the breadbasket of Canada

Economic Impact of Florida's Fruit and Vegetable Industries 1

STAFF PAPER SERIES. How Big is Minnesota s Food and Agricultural Industry? William F. Lazarus DEPARTMENT OF APPLIED ECONOMICS

Chapter 7: Agriculture. 7.1 Overview and Key findings

USDA Farm Data for the HICAHS Region

analyst REGIONAL San Joaquin County s Goods Movement System Stockton

CONTRIBUTION OF THE ETHANOL INDUSTRY TO THE ECONOMY OF MINNESOTA. February 29, 2016

The University of Georgia

Agriculture-Based Economic Development in New York State: Assessing the Inter-industry Linkages in the Agricultural and Food System

MINNESOTA AGRICULTURAL ECONOMIST

The Importance of Agriculture and its Transportation Issues

The Economic Importance of Food and Fiber

Executive Summary. Fruits and Berries

Economic Contributions of Agriculture, Natural Resources, and Food Industries in Florida in 2016 Executive Summary

2014 Economic Contribution Analysis of the Washington Beef Industry

Value Added. Economic Impact of Agriculture in Arkansas

Botetourt County Agriculture Strategic Plan. November 24, 2015

Transcription:

EBERHARDT SCHOOL OF BUSINESS BusinessForecasting Center 12 Lodi 99 in partnership with San Joaquin Council of Governments 26 5 4 Stockton Lathrop 205 120 Manteca Ripon Tracy Escalon analyst REGIONAL september 2008 Economic Impact of San Joaquin County Agriculture Sector Overall, the total economic impact of San Joaquin County Agriculture on the San Joaquin County Economy is over 6.6 billion in output and nearly 47,000 jobs, about 17% of total resident employment. Agriculture has been a historic mainstay of the San Joaquin County economy. One might think its importance has faded with rapid population growth and increasing urbanization, but the data show that the Agriculture sector has grown in parallel with the local economy. The most recent year, 2007, shattered records as the value of the county s farm production exceeded $2 billion for the first time. In San Joaquin County, agriculture is what economists call a basic industry, which sells most of its output outside the region and in turn supports a number of locallyoriented businesses. Thus, the economic impact of agriculture extends far beyond on-farm output and employment. These include indirect impacts on local sectors that critically support agriculture, ranging from trucking and wholesale trade, professional services such as veterinarians and accountants, and manufacturing of fertilizers and other agricultural chemicals. There are also induced impacts as income earned in agriculture is spent on health care, retail, housing, restaurants and other consumer needs.

Figure 1. Distribution of San Joaquin County Farm Production in 2007 Livestock & Poultry (5.9%) Nursery Products (6.8%) Field Crops (10.8%) Vegetable Crops (12.4%) Typically, economic impact analysis looks at the downward linkages described above, but the local Agriculture sector also has some critical upward linkages to local food and beverage manufacturing sectors. To fully account for the local impact of agriculture, it is important to include certain food and beverage manufacturing that is located in San Joaquin County primarily because of the local agriculture industry. Examples of these locally-sourced sectors would be Fruit and Vegetable Canning, Nut Roasting, and Wineries. In this report we classify them as locally-sourced, Value-added Food Processing sector. Without the local agricultural inputs, these would most likely not exist in San Joaquin County. Livestock & Poultry Products (23.5%) Fruits & Nuts (39.5%) Total Gross Value of Production: $2 Billions Apiary & Seed Crops (1.0%) Source: 2007 San Joaquin County Agricultural Report, Agricultural Commissioner Our assessment excludes food manufacturing sectors in the County that are not dependent on local agriculture, and are most likely located here to access nearby retail markets and take advantage of local transportation and labor resources. An important example of local food manufacturing we do not include is the General Mills plant in Lodi and local bakeries. Overall, the total economic impact of San Joaquin County Agriculture on the San Joaquin County Economy is over 6.6 billion in output and nearly 47,000 jobs, about 17% of total resident employment. Fruit and Nuts is the most important subsector, representing about 40% of total Farm Production impacts, and generating over 50% of the Value-added Processing impacts. San Joaquin County Farm Production San Joaquin County agriculture is notable not only for its size, but also its diversity and distinctive products. No county in the United States produces more asparagus and walnuts. No county in California produces more cherries, apples, corn and pumpkins. However, the largest agricultural product in terms of value is milk. Figure 1 shows the distribution of the San Joaquin County agricultural output. Fruit and Nuts is the largest category at 40% of output. Livestock and poultry products, primarily milk but also including 2 Regional Analyst September 2008

2,000 Figure 2. Gross Value of Farm Production San Joaquin County, 2001-2007 ($Millions) 800 Figure 3. Farm Acreage in San Joaquin County 2001-2007 (Thousands of Acres) Apiary 1,500 Livestock & Poultry Products Livestock & Poultry 600 Fruits and Nuts 1,000 Nursery Products 400 Vegetable Crops Fruits and Nuts 500 200 Field Crops Vegetable Crops Field Crops 0 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Sources: San Joaquin County Agricultural Reports, Agricultural Commissioner 0 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Sources: San Joaquin County Agricultural Reports, Agricultural Commissioner eggs, is about 25% of the county s output. San Joaquin County ranks number seven in total agricultural output in California, which is by far the leading state in the United States (U.S.) for agriculture. Although it trails southern Central Valley counties such as Fresno and Kern, San Joaquin County s Farm sector exceeds that of at least 10 states and is comparable to the total output of the six New England states combined. Figure 2 shows the growth in the County s agricultural output since 2001, and Figure 3 shows changes in farm acreage. The vegetable and nursery products categories have been fairly stable in terms of total value. In general, vegetables have become relatively less important as total acreage has declined 8%. Asparagus and melons have seen the largest declines this decade, whereas tomatoes and sweet corn have seen expanded production. Fruit and nuts have experienced steady growth as walnuts, almonds, cherries, and grapes have all added several thousand acres to production in recent years. The value of livestock and poultry production has seen steady growth and a surge in 2007 driven by high prices for milk. Field crops such as corn and hay are grown on over 50% of the acreage, but account for about 10% of value. Both field crop acres and value surged in 2007 in response to high corn prices fueled by the demand for bio-ethanol, a trend that is expected to continue without a change to government policy. While the value of farm production has steadily grown, Figure 4 shows that farm employment has declined since its 1999 peak at about 28,000 jobs. The most recent data from the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) shows that the Farm Production sector directly supports about 20,000 jobs in San Joaquin County, more than 7% of all employed San Joaquin County residents. The BEA data includes not only regular payroll workers, but also farm proprietors and workers not covered by unemployment insurance. Data from the state Employment Development Department (EDD) is more current but only counts payroll The over $2 billion worth of Farm Production output generates another $1.3 billion indirect and induced output impact, yielding a total output impact of $3.3 billion. Regional Analyst September 2008 3

30 26 22 Figure 4. Employment in Farm Production San Joaquin County (Thousands) workers. EDD data show a similar trend to BEA, peaking in 1999, and a subsequent decline up until 2006. The most recent EDD data show a slight increase in farm employment in 2007 and 2008 fairly steady to date, so it appears that farm employment has stabilized after decreasing in the first part of the decade to a level similar to the early 1990s. 18 14 '90 '91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA), U.S. Department of Commerce. The employment number includes not only farm workers but also farm proprietors. Figure 5. Economic Impact of Farm Production Sector Farm Production Sector Direct Output Impact ($ Millions) Indirect & Induced Total Cattle Ranching & Farming 550.0 516.7 1,066.7 Fruit & Tree Nut Farming 791.3 468.2 1,259.5 Nursery Production 137.3 81.3 218.5 Oil Seed and Grain Farming 82.2 40.3 122.5 Other Animal Production 15.9 8.9 24.8 Other Crop Farming 135.7 71.4 207.2 Poultry and Egg Production 40.2 13.3 53.4 Vegetable and Melon Farming 253.2 132.7 385.8 Total Output Impact 2,005.8 1,332.7 3,338.5 Employment Impact (Jobs) Total Employment Impact 19,336 13,445 32,781 The previous three paragraphs detail the direct economic impact of San Joaquin County farms. Its overall impact includes multiplier effects through inter-industry supplier purchases (indirect impact) and consumption spending from earnings in the industry (induced impact). For example, growing walnuts requires inputs such as the purchase and maintenance of farm equipment, buildings, agricultural chemicals, banking services and more. It also involves hiring workers who support the local economy through their spending on housing, healthcare, leisure activities, taxes, and more. Calculating these multiplier impacts requires the use of an input-output model, such as IMPLAN. The production categories reported earlier are slightly redefined from the local data discussed earlier to fit the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) categories used by IMPLAN. For instance, we split up livestock 4 Regional Analyst September 2008

and poultry products (primarily milk and eggs), and regroup them with the associated livestock sector (cattle and poultry). Figure 5 shows the $2 billion in 2007 farm output allocated to these groupings in the direct impact column. The largest output comes from Fruit and Tree Nut Farming, amounting to nearly $800 million or 40% of the total output. Cattle Ranching and Farming (which includes milk production) follows with $550 million, and Vegetable and Melon Farming has over $250 million in direct impacts. As it triggers inter-industry purchases, this over $2 billion worth of output generates another $1.3 billion indirect and induced output impact, yielding a total output impact of $3.3 billion. Figure 5 also shows that the largest indirect and induced impacts are attributable to Cattle Ranching and Farming so that this sector s total economic impact in the County exceeds $1 billion. Fruit and Nut Farming still has the highest total impact of around $1.25 billion. Employment impacts are more difficult to allocate to specific farm sectors since there is a significant amount of labor that moves between sectors. As a whole, the analysis shows over 13,000 San Joaquin County jobs are linked to farm production through indirect and induced impact, so that the total employment impact of San Joaquin County farms is just short of 33,000, about 12% of all working San Joaquin County residents. In other words, the jobs of about 1 in 8 local workers depend on farming. Locally Sourced Valueadded Food Processing Food product manufacturing is an important part of the San Joaquin County economy. A complete assessment of the economic impact of agriculture must also look at food production. Rather than look at the entire food manufacturing sector, two safeguards are taken to ensure that the local contribution of agriculture is not overstated. First, only the sectors that use mostly local agricultural inputs and are unlikely to exist in San Joaquin County without the presence of the associated Agricultural sector are Fruit and Nuts is the most important subsector representing about 40% of total Farm Production impacts, and generating over 50% of the Value-added Food Processing impacts. Regional Analyst September 2008 5

Figure 6. Employment in Value-added Food Processing Sector San Joaquin County (Thousands) and should not be interpreted that way. 8 6 4 2 0 '90 '91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 Source: California Regional Economies Employment (CREE), California Employment Development Department (CA EDD). Numbers for the Related Food Manufacturing are estimates. examined. Nut roasting and processing facilities are in the County because of the large nut production. The same can be said for fruit and vegetable canning and wineries. Several sectors that are not critically linked to local agriculture are excluded, most notably commercial baking and the General Mills cereal plant in Lodi. To avoid double counting, backward linkages to the Agricultural sector are excluded in our calculation of indirect and induced effects. For example, consider the indirect effects of wineries. Winery purchases of local grapes are excluded since grape production has already been fully captured in the previous analysis of the Farm Production sector. However, the Selected Food Mfg Wineries Total indirect effects of other inputs purchased by wineries such as payments for boxes and shipping are still included. Thus, this is not a full economic impact study of the Food Processing sector, Figure 6 shows that employment in these local sourced Valueadded Food Processing sector was in decline until about 2002 but has since shown slow steady gains over the past 5 years. There was a steep decline of over 1,000 Fruit and Vegetable canning jobs in 2001 and 2002, and the growth since then has been more broad-based with slight gains in Nuts, Fruit and Vegetable Canning, Wineries, and Meat Processing that parallels the slow and steady increase in the local production of nuts, grapes, cherries, cattle and poultry. Overall, local direct employment in these sectors is slightly over 5,000 jobs - about 2% of the County s workers. The value of these sectors output is around $2.2 billion, which is a similar value of production to the Farm Figure 7. Economic Impact of Value-added Food Processing Sector Processing Sector Direct Output Impact ($ Millions) Indirect & Induced Total Cheese and Dairy Mfg 206.3 131.8 338.1 Meat & Poultry Processing Mfg 307.8 165.9 473.7 Roasted Nut & Other Snack Mfg 430.6 123.9 554.5 Fruit & Vegetable Canning Mfg 736.4 383.1 1,119.5 Wet Corn Milling 162.6 70.8 233.3 Wineries 422.5 201.0 623.5 Total Output Impact 2,266.0 1,076.0 3,343.0 Employment Impact (Jobs) Total Employment Impact 5,409 8,579 13,988 6 Regional Analyst September 2008

Production sector. However, the processing sector operates with about 25% of the workers in the Farm sector, and subsequently wages are nearly double that of this sector. Food manufacturing wages average nearly $40,000 per year, comparable to the overall County average annual wage. Figure 7 shows that the Valueadded Processing sector generates a direct output impact of $2.3 billion, or about $250 million more than Farm Production sector. The largest output impact comes from Fruit and Vegetable Canning, which amounts to nearly $750 million, or more than 30% of total direct output impact. Wineries and Nut related sectors follow with more than $400 million direct output impacts. The $2.3 billion Value-added Processing output generates another $1 billion worth of indirect and induced output impact (after stripping out indirect impacts in the Farm Production sector). This yields a total output impact of $3.3 billion, about the same as the Farm Production sector. Figure 7 also shows substantial indirect and induced employment of around 8,500 jobs that brings the total employment impact to about 14,000 jobs. The employment multipliers for Food Processing are much larger than the Farm Production sector, a reflection of the higher wages and different input characteristics of the food manufacturing sector. Total Economic Impact of Agriculture Sector on San Joaquin County Economy Figure 8 shows the total economic impact of overall Agriculture sector, which represents the combined impact generated by both Farm Production and Value-added Food Processing sectors. Both groups of activities generate a combined $4.3 billion of direct output, which further generate another $2.4 billion of indirect and induced output. In total, they create $6.6 billion of total output impact. In terms of Type of Impact employment, they generate a total of nearly 47,000 jobs. More than 17% of County residents jobs either directly or indirectly associated with the Agriculture sector. Moreover, the sector also generates a total of more than $300 million of tax revenues for the state and local government. Some of the top economic sectors outside agriculture and manufacturing that are supported by the County s agricultural industry are shown in Figure 9. In terms of output, the leading sectors are Wholesale Trade, Real Figure 8. Overall Economic Impact of Agriculture Sector Direct Farm Production Sector Indirect & Induced Total Output Impact ($ Millions) 2,005.8 1,332.7 3,338.5 Employment Impact (Jobs) 19,336 13,445 32,781 Tax Impact ($ Millions) -- -- 176.5 Value-added Food Processing Sector Output Impact ($ Millions) 2,266.1 1,076.4 3,342.5 Employment Impact (Jobs) 5,409 8,579 13,988 Tax Impact ($ Millions) -- -- 136.1 Total Agriculture Sector Output Impact ($ Millions) 4,271.8 2,408.7 6,681.5 Employment Impact (Jobs) 24,745 22,024 46,769 Tax Impact ($ Millions) -- -- 312.6 For questions or comments about this article, please contact: Business Forecasting Center Eberhardt School of Business 3601 Pacific Avenue Stockton, CA 95211 Phone: 209.946.7385 Director, Jeffrey Michael E-mail: jmichael@pacific.edu Regional Economic Analyst, Christiadi E-mail: cchristiadi@pacific.edu Regional Analyst September 2008 7

Figure 9. Top 5 Private Industries Receiving Indirect and Induced Impact of Agriculture Sector* Industry Output Impact ($ Millions) Employment Impact (Jobs) Wholesale Trade 262.5 1,825.8 Real Estate & Rental 173.9 938.4 Health & Social Services 150.3 1,873.3 Finance & Insurance 142.6 766.5 Transportation & Warehousing 139.2 1,227.3 Retail Trade 138.1 1,894.2 Food Processing sectors than the other farm sectors, as an even larger share (at least 50%) of locally-sourced Value-added Food Processing is critically dependent on fruit and nuts. * The list includes only industries outside of Agriculture, Manufacturing, and the Government sectors. Estate, Healthcare, and Finance. Looking at total jobs, Retail, Healthcare and Wholesale trade, and Food Service have the most jobs indirectly connected to Agriculture. Sectors such as Real Estate and Finance have relatively high wages compared to Retail and Food Service, and will therefore rank lower in total employment than output. This report also highlights the critical role of the Fruit and Nut sector to local economy. It is the leading category of farm output with about 40% of the value of farm production. However, it is even more critically linked to upstream San Joaquin County Council of Governments 555 E. Weber Avenue Stockton, CA 95202 PH: 209.468.3913 Presort Standard U.S. Postage Paid Stockton, CA Permit #383 INSIDE THIS ISSUE Economic Impact of San Joaquin County Agriculture Sector...Page 1 San Joaquin County Farm Production...Page 2 Local Sourced Value-added Food Processing...Page 5 Total Economic Impact of Agriculture Sector of San Joaquin County Economy...Page 7