Mean Percentile Rank. Percentile Rank in Industry - Education - Postsecondary/ Higher Education Database

Similar documents
UMD Graduate Assistants Overall

Strengths. Opportunities. Engaged Not Engaged Actively Disengaged Engagement Index Ratio: % 61% 10%

NZ Police 2007 Employee Engagement Survey (Organisational Health Audit) Results Presentation

BUILDING A STRONGER WORKPLACE AT KYRENE SCHOOL DISTRICT

Gallup Q12 Assessment August 7, I. Introduction

What Creates an Engaged Higher Education Workforce? Why Would Anyone Want to Do Our Job?

Employee Engagement Hierarchy

Getting Engaged - What is Employee Engagement and Why Does it Matter?

1/26/2012 TOPICS 2011 SAN MATEO COUNTY EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT SURVEY SURVEY BACKGROUND SURVEY BACKGROUND

TEAM MEMBER ENGAGEMENT

The Competitive Advantage of Employee Engagement:

Employee Engagement. What s Your Engagement Ratio?

GALLUP CLIENT PLATFORM Q 12 REPORTING

The MLH Engagement Journey. Some people grow up to be housekeepers, and it is our job to find them.

50 EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT. IDEAS and TIPS A LEADER S GUIDE TO EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT

The 12 Ways to Engage & Retain Staff Part 5

Employee Engagement: Myth or Magic

PHCA Annual Convention. Welcome And Warm Up 9/10/2016. Culture/ Employee Engagement s Impact on Your Bottom Line, and How to Improve it

HR.com August 16, Bob Lavigna Bob Lavigna

How Managers Impact Culture & Engagement. Janice Appleby Chief Human Resources Officer Gallup Certified Strengths Coach

employee engagement material minds

University of Virginia Health System School of Medicine (SOM)

SCCE Compliance & Ethics Institute

EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT EQUATION

SampleCo Organization Survey Results

WHY EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT MATTERS. Kathy Bowersox

HRAC UPDATES CLICK TO EDIT MASTER TITLE STYLE. Department of Human Resources. January 7, 2019

GALLUP S PERSPECTIVE ON. Designing Your Organization s Employee Experience

Heidi Hrowal. Program & Policy Development Advisor, Employee Performance Management Los Angeles Unified School District

ENGAGE YOUR ASSOCIATES TO IMPROVE YOUR RESULTS

2016 EMPLOYEE SURVEY RESULTS AND ANALYSIS

Workplace. State of the American. The State of the American Workplace ANNAMARIE MANN. Workplace Analytics Practice Manager

Creating Thriving Schools During a Teacher Shortage

Improving Staff Engagement Without Spending Money and Using Very Little Time. Disclosures. Relevant Financial Relationship(s): Nothing to Disclose

Employee Engagement Best Practices at NRC

EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION SURVEY VOICE OF EMPLOYEE - ANALYSIS & RESULTS. SpiceJet Employee Satisfaction Survey

Staff engagement Where are we now?

Team Conversation Starters

The ROI of Strengths

Survey Solutions. Frontline Manager s Toolkit for Interpreting Survey Results

Coaching and Leadership Development in Non-Profit Settings

Building a Culture of Engagement: Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi Pharmacy Experience

There is not much agreement on

University wide Report Delivering quality survey, research and analysis solutions

Bruce K. Berger, Ph.D., Juan Meng, Ph.D., and William Heyman

Employee Engagement Survey Report Guide 2018

How Employee Engagement can Improve Safety in the Workplace. October 8, 2015

Building a Culture of Employee Engagement in Government

Employee Engagement A PATH TO GOVERNMENT RE-DESIGN

Demonstrating Positive Elearning ROI

UAF Administrative Services Work Environment Survey. Prepared for: University of Alaska, Fairbanks Administrative Services

The Role of the Manager in Impacting Employee Engagement. Presented by: Kerry Liberman, President People Perspectives LLC

Employee Engagement 101. Presented by Kelli Vrla, CSP

3 Components to High-Performing Healthcare Facilities: Data, Communication & Engagement

Developing High Performing Team Members 5/4/2016

Employee Engagement in New Normal. ARL HR Conference, December

Info-Tech Research Group

2017 One Stop Wellness, Inc. All Rights Reserved

International Association of Advances in Research and Development International Journal of Economics And Business Management

Jeffco Public Schools

Job Satisfaction and Employment Engagement:

2017 National NHS staff survey. Brief summary of results from London Ambulance Service NHS Trust

Supervisor Core - Module 2 - Leadership in the Child Welfare System. Ohio Child Welfare Training Program,

Staff Retention. August 7, 2015 Brandi Alexander, BSW Michelle R. Datema, MS RN Rita Trinklein, MA Cynthia Zagar, LMSW

Employee Engagement Leadership Workshop

BUILDING A CULTURE OF ENGAGEMENT: THE IMPORTANCE OF SENIOR LEADERSHIP

Work Expectations Profile

Coconino Community College Employee Opinion Survey

Report Employee Satisfaction Survey

2016 National NHS staff survey. Brief summary of results from Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust

EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT SURVEY 2011 RESULTS

Sample Company. New Hire Survey Report. Prepared For: Current Survey Period: Month Year Month Year New Hires (Surveys Completed Month - Month Year)

SPRING 2012 EMPLOYEE OUTLOOK PART OF THE CIPD OUTLOOK SERIES

Building A Team Who Will Walk Through Walls for You Presented by: Sarah Hanna CEO

2016 National NHS staff survey. Brief summary of results from Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust

Assessing Employee Engagement in an ODL Context: Some Observation from the Zimbabwe Open University

2016 National NHS staff survey. Brief summary of results from Hertfordshire Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust

New Hire Survey. Sample Company, Inc. # of employees: 223. # of responses: 116. responses rate: 52% Current Period: Apr 1, 2017 Oct 31, 2017

Inclusiveness Index for Q 12

Wisconsin Department of Revenue: Enhancing Employee Engagement Tuesday, June 14, 2016

2016 National NHS staff survey. Brief summary of results from Leicestershire Partnership NHS Trust

Organizational Culture Diagnostic Instrument (OCDI)

Dynamic Employee Engagement in Times of Change

Alignment. Engagement. performance. Low. Legend: NSW + All staff

2015 National NHS staff survey. Brief summary of results from Sussex Community NHS Trust

Managing and Motivating People

ENGAGING AND EMPOWERING EMPLOYEES: FROM BULLIES TO GO-GETTERS

The Employee Net Promoter Score: A (new) Metric for Assessing Your Workforce Engagement Profile

Today s Alternate Agenda. Welcome Groups & Teams Approaches to People A Healthy Organizational Climate (Optional singing of Kum By Ya)

COMPLIANCE VS ENGAGEMENT

Engagement Survey. Table of Contents

Increase Employee Engagement Through Training

NOVA Behavioral Healthcare Corporation. Annual Employee Survey Report, ICF/MR. July, 2011

EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT SURVEY

Closing the Discretionary Effort Gap The Business Case for Employee Engagement Through Performance Management

2017 National NHS staff survey. Brief summary of results from South East Coast Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust

Leadership MOT. Action Planning Guide

Performance Group. Employee Engagement EMPLOYEE COMMITMENT INDEXTM SCORECARD GUIDE

UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT GUIDE

THE DYNAMICS OF EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT

Transcription:

EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT REPORT Lewis & Clark College Employee Engagement Q12 All - All Jan 22, 2018 - Feb 03, 2018 Q 12 GrandMean Change Mean Percentile Rank Engagement Index N/A 52 Engaged 37% Last mean: N/A Percentile Rank in Industry - Education - Postsecondary/ Higher Education Database Not Engaged 51% Actively Disengaged 12% Not shown if n < 4 for Mean and Top Box, n < 10 for Frequency, or data is unavailable. Mean Percentile Rank is being calculated against other workgroup scores in the Industry - Education - Postsecondary/Higher Education database. Meaningful change is represented by a green or red arrow if the score changes by 0.2 or more between survey periods. Percentile Rank in Industry - Education - Postsecondary/Higher Education Database < 25th Percentile 25-49th Percentile 50-74th Percentile 75-89th Percentile >= 90th Percentile Percent Engaged available when n 30. All categories available when n 100.

Gallup Q¹² Items Total N Current Mean Last Mean Change Engagement Index The Gallup Q 12 score represents the average of the scores of 12 items that Gallup has consistently found to measure employee engagement as linked to business outcomes. 552 N/A N/A Engaged: 37% Not Engaged: 51% Actively Disengaged: 12% Q00: How satisfied are you with your organization as a place to work? Total N 551 3.74 Q01: I know what is expected of me at work. 552 4.27 Q02: I have the materials and equipment I need to do my work right. Q03: At work, I have the opportunity to do what I do best every day. Q04: In the last seven days, I have received recognition or praise for doing good work. Q05: My supervisor, or someone at work, seems to care about me as a person. Q06: There is someone at work who encourages my development. 550 3.93 547 3.90 523 3.27 539 4.27 532 3.70 Q07: At work, my opinions seem to count. 542 3.76 Q08: The mission or purpose of my organization makes me feel my job is important. Q09: My associates are committed to doing quality work. 543 4.09 547 4.23 Q10: I have a best friend at work. 519 3.12 Current Mean Frequency Distribution 1 2 3 4 5 1:1% 2:7% 3:25% 4:50% 5:17% 1:0% 2:5% 3:10% 4:38% 5:47% 1:2% 2:7% 3:20% 4:38% 5:33% 1:3% 2:8% 3:21% 4:34% 5:34% 1:18% 2:15% 3:18% 4:22% 5:28% 1:4% 2:6% 3:10% 4:22% 5:59% 1:7% 2:12% 3:21% 4:24% 5:36% 1:7% 2:7% 3:19% 4:36% 5:31% 1:3% 2:6% 3:15% 4:30% 5:45% 1:1% 2:4% 3:13% 4:33% 5:48% 1:17% 2:17% 3:24% 4:21% 5:21% Industry - Education - Postsecondary/Higher Education 46 27 47 34 45 35 51 35 46 27 60 50 45 31 59 41 63 45 66 52 47 19 Gallup Overall Q11: In the last six months, someone at work has talked to me about my progress. 531 3.37 1:17% 2:12% 3:17% 4:25% 5:29% 31 19 Q12: This last year, I have had opportunities at work to learn and grow. 539 3.95 1:5% 2:9% 3:13% 4:33% 5:40% 52 36 2

ENGAGEMENT HIERARCHY Growth - How can I grow? Total N Current Mean Last Mean Change 543 N/A N/A Total N Current Mean Frequency Distribution 1 2 3 4 5 Industry - Education - Postsecondary/Higher Education Gallup Overall Q11: Progress In the last six months, someone at work has talked to me about my progress. 531 3.37 1:17% 2:12% 3:17% 4:25% 5:29% 31 19 Q12: Learn and Grow This last year, I have had opportunities at work to learn and grow. 539 3.95 1:5% 2:9% 3:13% 4:33% 5:40% 52 36 3

ENGAGEMENT HIERARCHY Teamwork - Do I belong here? Total N Current Mean Last Mean Change 550 N/A N/A Total N Current Mean Frequency Distribution 1 2 3 4 5 Industry - Education - Postsecondary/Higher Education Gallup Overall Q07: Opinions Count At work, my opinions seem to count. 542 3.76 1:7% 2:7% 3:19% 4:36% 5:31% 59 41 Q08: Mission/Purpose The mission or purpose of my organization makes me feel my job is important. 543 4.09 1:3% 2:6% 3:15% 4:30% 5:45% 63 45 Q09: Committed to Quality My associates are committed to doing quality work. 547 4.23 1:1% 2:4% 3:13% 4:33% 5:48% 66 52 Q10: Best Friend I have a best friend at work. 519 3.12 1:17% 2:17% 3:24% 4:21% 5:21% 47 19 4

ENGAGEMENT HIERARCHY Individual - What do I give? Total N Current Mean Last Mean Change 551 N/A N/A Total N Current Mean Frequency Distribution 1 2 3 4 5 Industry - Education - Postsecondary/Higher Education Gallup Overall Q03: Opportunity to do Best At work, I have the opportunity to do what I do best every day. 547 3.90 1:3% 2:8% 3:21% 4:34% 5:34% 51 35 Q04: Recognition In the last seven days, I have received recognition or praise for doing good work. 523 3.27 1:18% 2:15% 3:18% 4:22% 5:28% 46 27 Q05: Cares About Me My supervisor, or someone at work, seems to care about me as a person. 539 4.27 1:4% 2:6% 3:10% 4:22% 5:59% 60 50 Q06: Development There is someone at work who encourages my development. 532 3.70 1:7% 2:12% 3:21% 4:24% 5:36% 45 31 5

ENGAGEMENT HIERARCHY Basic Needs - What do I get? Total N Current Mean Last Mean Change 552 N/A N/A Total N Current Mean Frequency Distribution 1 2 3 4 5 Industry - Education - Postsecondary/Higher Education Gallup Overall Q01: Know What's Expected I know what is expected of me at work. 552 4.27 1:0% 2:5% 3:10% 4:38% 5:47% 47 34 Q02: Materials and Equipment I have the materials and equipment I need to do my work right. 550 3.93 1:2% 2:7% 3:20% 4:38% 5:33% 45 35 6

Engagement Index There is a powerful link between employees who are engaged in their jobs and the achievement of crucial business outcomes. Engaged Engaged employees feel involved in and enthusiastic about their work and workplace; they are loyal and productive. Not Engaged Not Engaged employees are less likely to put high energy and passion into their work and are less loyal and productive. Actively Disengaged Actively disengaged employees are emotionally against the organization; they are not loyal and are likely to undermine the efforts of others. Engagement Index Ratio 3:1 3 Engaged to Actively Disengaged Employees % Past % 37% * 51% * 12% * Percent Engaged available when n 30. All categories available when n 100. 7

FOOTNOTES Not shown if n < 4 for Mean and Top Box, n < 10 for Frequency, or data is unavailable. Meaningful change is represented by a green or red arrow if the score changes by 0.2 or more between survey periods. Percentile Rank in Industry - Education - Postsecondary/Higher Education Database < 25th Percentile 25-49th Percentile 50-74th Percentile 75-89th Percentile >= 90th Percentile Percent Engaged available when n 30. All categories available when n 100. 8

GLOSSARY The glossary provides high-level definitions of terms within the engagement report. Because of the dynamic nature of this site, not all terms will be applicable to or displayed on your report. Please use the terms that are relevant to your team when discussing and interpreting the data. ENGAGEMENT DEFINED EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT: Employee engagement refers to how committed an employee is to their organisation, their role, their manager and their co-workers. Engagement drives performance. Gallup's research shows that more highly engaged employees give more discretionary effort at work and have higher productivity, profitability and customer service, as well as reduced turnover and safety incidents. THE SURVEY ITEMS/QUESTIONS OVERALL SATISFACTION: Overall Satisfaction is a measure of how content your team is with the overall company as a place to work. Overall Satisfaction is not included in the Overall Workgroup Engagement (GrandMean) score. Being a satisfied employee does not equate with being engaged, though the two are highly related. Q01-Q12: These items are Gallup s proprietary workgroup engagement questions (commonly referred to as the Q¹² ). These items were selected for their strong connection to performance outcomes and the ability to take action at the workgroup level. INDICES: In addition to the Q¹² items, Gallup has created a number of empirically-derived sets of indices, which are comprised of 3-4 questions each. Individual scores of each index item are provided, along with a combined index score, which measures the strength of the core index construct. These indices help companies strategically pinpoint and improve specific focus areas relevant to their current situation. CUSTOM ITEMS: These items are unique to your company and can vary across companies and surveys. While these additional questions link to the Gallup Engagement hierarchy, they are not always within the power of the workgroup to influence or change. These questions can provide additional insights into employees perceptions, the situational workplace environment or company-specific initiatives. EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT RESULTS GRANDMEAN: The GrandMean measures overall Workgroup Engagement, which is an average of the 12 Workgroup Engagement items (Q01-Q12). The higher your score (with a maximum possible score of 5), the more engaged your fellow employees are. ENGAGEMENT INDEX: The Engagement Index (EI) is a macro-level indicator of an organisation's health that allows leaders to track the engagement levels of employees. This analysis identifies the percentage of participants who are engaged, not engaged and actively disengaged based on their responses to the Q¹² survey items. You must have 100 employees participate to receive the full spectrum of responses for the EI. If you have 30<100 employees, the report will include the percentage of engaged employees only. ENGAGEMENT HIERARCHY: Every employee has a distinct set of needs that follows a hierarchy, with basic needs at the foundation and growth at the top. Employees feel more or less engaged depending on how well they believe their needs are being met in the workplace. UNDERSTANDING THE SCORES THE SURVEY SCALE: The engagement survey utilises a 5-point scale with 1=Strongly Disagree and 5=Strongly Agree. For each question, employees have the option to also select 9

Don t know or Does not apply. TOTAL N: The total number of employees who responded to the survey. MEAN SCORES: The average score using the 5-point survey scale, with 5.00 being the highest score and 1.00 being the lowest. TOP BOX/%5: The percentage of employees who responded 5 Strongly Agree to the survey item. DISTRIBUTION OF RESPONSES: The percentage of employees who responded 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5 to an item. If 10 or more employees respond to the survey, the report could display a full distribution of responses. Otherwise, only the percentage of employees who responded with a 5 (TopBox) and item means will display. SUPPRESSED DATA: Confidentiality of responses is extremely important to Gallup. If too few employees respond to a survey item, the data will be suppressed (not published) and an asterisk ( * ) will appear in its place. COMPARISONS EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING: (GALLUP DATABASE COMPARISON): Used as a benchmark to determine how your team s results compare to other workgroups within the Gallup Database of clients. PERCENTILE RANKING: The 25th percentile indicates 75% of workgroups fell above this score; the 50th percentile indicates 50% of workgroups fell above and below this score; the 75th percentile indicates only 25% of workgroups fell above this score. The higher your percentile, the stronger the item is in relation to the database. Used as a benchmark to determine how your team's results compare to internal and external workgroups. 10