Rapid City, SD HDR Project No RE: Replacement of Existing I-190 Twin Bridges at I-190/Silver Street Interchange, Rapid City, SD

Similar documents
Conceptual Design Report

6 th STREET VIADUCT SIESMIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

Chapter 1. General Design Information. Section 1.02 Structure Selection and Geometry. Introduction

I-35/I-80/Iowa 141 Interchange IJR and NEPA A Practical Approach to Resolving a Decades-Old Traffic Operations Challenge

EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITION ASSESSMENT REPORT (ERCAR) SAMPLE OUTLINE

CHAPTER 4 GRADE SEPARATIONS AND INTERCHANGES

Alternatives Development Report. Twin Ports Interchange Reconstruction Project

LOCATION AND DESIGN DIVISION

CHAPTER 3 SCOPE SUMMARY

AGENDA AGENDA. Route 15/29 SBL Bridge Superstructure Replacement & Widening. NOVA District. Bridge Views SCOPE. Existing Structure.

DRAFT. SR-60 7 th Avenue Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) I-605 Corridor Improvement Project (CIP) I-605/SR-60 EA# 3101U0

Exit 73 I-29 Interchange Modification Justification Study

SOUTH MEDFORD INTERCHANGE BRIDGES

49-2A Clear-Zone Width for New Construction or Reconstruction B Clear-Zone Adjustment Factor, K cz, for Horizontal Curve...

ASCE STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING CONFERENCE. Ames Iowa

500 Interchange Design

STRUCTURE AND BRIDGE DIVISION

Red Wing Bridge Alternates

2.0 Purpose. 3.0 Work Plan. Page 1 of 7

Clinton Street Bridge over the Maumee River. ODOT Project DEF December 2, 2014 Stakeholder s Meeting

WELCOME. Public Meeting for I-35 / I-44 Interchange. October 6, 2015

TRANSPORTATION PROJECT REPORT DRAFT CONCEPTUAL ACCESS MODIFICATION PROPOSAL OCTOBER 2002

2016 STRUCTURE INSPECTION APPRAISAL REPORT. Prepared For: THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF AMARANTH COUNTY OF DUFFERIN

Conclusions & Lessons Learned

GEOMETRIC DESIGN CRITERIA for Non-freeway Resurfacing, Restoration, and Rehabilitation Projects

EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITION ASSESSMENT REPORT (ERCAR) SAMPLE OUTLINE

PROJECT SCOPING PHASE ~ SCOPE OF SERVICES MAIN STREET BRIDGE OVER WINOOSKI RIVER CITIES OF BURLINGTON & WINOOSKI VERMONT

Mn/DOT BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT

Steve Haines, P.E., Parsons, (303) , James Studer, Kiewit, (926) ,

Engineering Design Services for Safety Improvements along CR 476 from the Hernando County Line to US 301 (SR 35) Sumter County, Florida

DESIGN OF CAMPBELL ROAD OVERPASS IN KELOWNA. Yulin Gao, M.A.Sc., P.Eng., SNC-Lavalin Inc. Samson Chan, M.Eng., P. Eng., SNC-Lavalin Inc.

I 75 PD&E STUDIES TABLE OF CONTENTS DTTM, TECHNICAL REPORT No. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS

500 Interchange Design

The Folded Interchange: An Unconventional Design for the Reconstruction of Cloverleaf Interchanges

APPROACHES AND BRIDGE OVER TYE RIVER (RTE. 29 NBL) RFP QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS-REVISION 2

CHITTENDEN COUNTY REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION Winooski/Burlington, US RTs 2 & 7 Bridge Scoping Study ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING NO.

MAINE TURNPIKE AUTHORITY ADDENDUM NO. 1 CONTRACT EXIT 103 SOUTHBOUND UNDERPASS BRIDGE REHABILITATION MILE 103.0

South Dakota Department of Transportation. Interchange Modification Justification Report. Interstate 90 Exit 44 (Bethlehem Road - Piedmont)

Maine Turnpike Authority FINAL 4-year Capital Investment Plan ( )

FOR INTERSTATE 81 AND ROUTE 37 INTERCHANGE FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA MILEPOST 310

billion Move Illinois Program includes the 62-mile-long Jane Addams Memorial Tollway (I-90) Rebuilding and Widening Project.

PROJECT UPDATE SOUTH NORFOLK JORDAN BRIDGE CITIES OF PORTSMOUTH AND CHESAPEAKE, VIRGINIA. April 2012

SCCRTC- MP San Lorenzo River Bridge Walkway Widening Feasibility Report

St. Francis Drive through the City of Santa Fe Corridor Study

January 2015 v 2.0. (Revised April 2016)

Guidelines for Checking Final Design Bridge Plans

STATE OF NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

State of New Jersey NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1035 PARKWAY AVENUE P.O. Box 600 TRENTON, NEW JERSEY

Project Team. D6 South Miami-Dade Resident Engineer Erik Padron, P.E. D6 Construction Project Manager Dari Vorce

University Region FY 2023 Final Scoping Package

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT

SAN ANTONIO STREET BRIDGE AT COMAL RIVER. Open House

I-95 Corridor Study Phase II Highway Element

I-65/I-70 North Split Project

QEW Garden City Skyway Niagara Street to Glendale Avenue Risk and Value Engineering Support Major Infrastructure Decisions

Review of Plans and Specs from a Constructability Perspective

Railway Alignment Design and Geometry

APPENDIX G DIVERSION AND PELICAN LAKE CUTOFF CHANNELS HYRAULICS AND BRIDGE TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

APPENDIX B. Excerpts from the October 2002 Conceptual Alternatives Report

USE OF HIGH PERFORMANCE STEEL IN TEXAS BRIDGES

Ironton Russell Bridge Project

NEWINGTON-DOVER WELCOME

Rt. 15/29 (SBL) Bridge Superstructure Replacement and Roadway Widening

Pattullo Bridge Replacement Project. Cost Report

IMPROVING I 81 IN MARYLAND

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT

Traffic Technical Memorandum: Hickman Road over Tuolumne River Bridge Replacement Project, Stanislaus County (BRLO-5938(199))

I-395 HOV Ramp at Seminary Road From: Sanger Avenue To: Seminary Road. with I-395 NB Auxiliary Lane Extension From: Duke Street To: Sanger Avenue

Ironton Russell Bridge Project

Public Meeting. SD 37 James River Bridge Beadle County P 0037(140)140 PCN 04FH. Steve Johnson, PE Chief Bridge Design Engineer.

Ironton Russell Bridge Project

S.R. 0070, Section T20. Engineering District ASHE National Project of the Year Award

PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING TUESDAY MARCH 9, 2010

Bridge Deck Drainage

Northeast Bridge Preservation Partnership Meeting

Ironton Russell Bridge Project

SCOPE OF WORK AND DELIVERABLES

Ironton Russell Bridge Project

NORTHWEST CORRIDOR PROJECT. NOISE TECHNICAL REPORT 2015 Addendum Phase IV

Cumberland Viaduct Rehabilitation Project Contract No. AL R Presenter Bob Bofinger MDSHA Office of Structures

2 Purpose and Need. 2.1 Study Area. I-81 Corridor Improvement Study Tier 1 Draft Environmental Impact Statement

2016 UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT. CSAH 22 over POMME DE TERRE RIVER. Date of Inspection: Equipment Used: 06/18/2016. County Highway Agency

CE 435/535, Fall 2003 Preliminary Design Example 1 / 6

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Permit Application Tips

LOCATION HYDRAULIC REPORT

2003 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING STUDY JUNE 2006

Ironton Russell Bridge Project

Submission Date: November 14, ,114 words (not including Title Page) plus words each = 4,114

Design and Construction of the SH58 Ramp A Flyover Bridge over IH70. Gregg A. Reese, PE, CE, Summit Engineering Group, Inc.

How to Review SI&A Data

The Main Street Bridge - Supporting Transportation Systems

Ironton Russell Bridge Project

PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING June 24, 2015

STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION LOAD RATING REPORT GENERAL SULLIVAN BRIDGE - DOVER 200/023 OVER THE LITTLE BAY

I-65/I-70 North Split Project. Alternatives Screening Report CAC Meeting October 9, 2018

STRUCTURE SELECTION REPORT

I-395 Reconstruction MDX SR Improvements I-95 Concrete Pavement Reconstruction

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT

Community Advisory Committee Meeting No. 2. June 22, 2006

Chapter GRADE SEPARATIONS & INTERCHANGES

Transcription:

To: Steve Gramm, SDDOT Memo From: HDR Project: SDDOT I-190 Silver Street Interchange Study Rapid City, SD HDR Project No. 000000000137390 Date: December 27, 2011 RE: Replacement of Existing I-190 Twin Bridges at I-190/Silver Street Interchange, Rapid City, SD Background SDDOT has requested a study to evaluate the design and operations of replacing the Silver Street interchange on I-190 in Rapid City. I-190 crosses over Silver Street/North Street with twin bridges that carry northbound (NB) and southbound (SB) traffic. The adjacent terrain is not conducive to changing the profiles of I-190 and North Street, therefore, preliminary design alternatives were developed maintaining I-190 traffic over North Street through the interchange. For each of the interchange alternatives, the bridge(s) are on a tangent which would not require curved structures or superelevation. The study has been spurred by structural deficiencies with the Silver Street Interchange bridges; therefore these existing 2-lane bridges will be replaced. The structure alternatives documented in this technical memo are part of a comprehensive study of the I-190 Silver Street interchange which includes preparation of an interchange modification justification report (IMJR) and an environmental assessment (EA). Project administration is through the South Dakota Department of Transportation Office of Project Development. The purpose of this memo is to describe the preliminary structure options studied for the replacement bridges. An outline of this memo is as follows: Overall Project Limits and Proposed Traffic Phasing Description of the Existing Bridges Criteria used for Preliminary Bridge Options Bridge Option Summary Conclusions Appendix Overall Project Limits and Proposed Traffic Phasing Bridge inspections continue to show structural deterioration in the existing I-190 bridges at Exit 1C that requires maintenance to keep the structures open to the traveling public. The deterioration and added maintenance costs show that the existing structures are reaching the end of their useful life. The SDDOT Statewide Transportation Improvement Program indicates a project for the replacement of the bridges programmed for 2015. In addition to the bridge replacements, a total interchange reconstruction is also being planned. The overall project limits for the proposed modified interchange layouts are being addressed in the Environmental Analysis (Alternative 1, 1a, and 2a) and shown on pages 2-4. During project construction, traffic is expected to be maintained on the existing roadway while the proposed structure(s) are constructed adjacent to and to the west of the existing bridges. Periodic lane closures will be necessary to allow for work to occur adjacent to the existing roadway and a closure of I-190 may be necessary to tie each end of the proposed alignments to the existing alignments. All traffic will be moved to the new roadway alignment and bridges after they are completed so that the existing bridges can be demolished. Page 1

Description of the Existing Bridges Per the 2011 SDDOT bridge inspection, the existing NB I-190 6 span bridge over Silver Street was built in 1959 having a total length of 394-0 and an overall bridge width of 34-4. The existing SB I-190 7 span bridge was built in 1959 having a total length of 421-0 and an overall bridge width of 34-4. Each roadway width is 30 which carries two lanes of traffic on each structure. The twin bridges are approximately 40 apart from centerline of roadways and are parallel to each other. The superstructure is a continuous steel girder with a substandard clearance height of 12 above Silver Street. The substructure consists of twocolumn piers and sill type abutments. An aerial photograph is shown below and general pictures of the bridges are shown on page 6. Aerial Photograph of Existing Bridges Page 5

Looking southeast at existing bridges from Silver Street. Looking southwest at existing bridges from Howard Johnson parking lot. Page 6

Criteria used for Preliminary Bridge Options Preliminary designs for potential interchange Alternatives allow for either a single bridge structure handling NB and SB traffic or separate structures for each direction of traffic. Specific structure types were not considered in these planning stages, only the general deck area of the bridge structures required for the interchange alternatives are being covered in this memo. Bridge Width The proposed bridge section for Alternatives 1, 1a and 2a will carry two lanes of traffic utilizing 12 wide lanes with a 6 inside shoulder and a 10 outside shoulder. The proposed sections for the 2 bridge section and single bridge section can be found below. Each bridge in the 2 bridge section will have a width of 42.7 for a combined width of 85.4 for both structures. The single bridge section will have a width of 85.1. PROPOSED 2 BRIDGE SECTON PROPOSED SINGLE BRIDGE SECTON Page 7

Bridge Length City of Rapid City North/Philadelphia Street crosses under the I-190 mainline in the proposed interchange layouts. The proposed section for the cross street in all alternatives is five lanes with a sidewalk on each side. Alternative 1 maintains the existing skewed connection of North Street and Silver Street with a standard diamond interchange having a proposed bridge length of 212. The proposed bridge length of Alternative 1a, standard diamond interchange with a modified North Street to Philadelphia Street connection, is 154. Alternative 2a, a single point urban interchange with the North/Philadelphia connection, requires more sight distance under the structure having a proposed length of 194. Bridge Option Summary The following table summarizes estimated structure construction costs as compared in the three interchange Alternative options: PRELIMINARY BRIDGE COMPARISON SUMMARY Alternative 1 1a 2a Bridge Section 2 Bridges Single Bridge 2 Bridges Single Bridge 2 Bridges Single Bridge Total Bridge Length (feet) 424 212 308 154 388 194 Total Bridge Width (feet) 42.7 84.7 42.7 84.7 42.7 84.7 Deck Area (square feet) 18,104.8 17,956.4 13,151.6 13,043.8 16,567.6 16,431.8 Unit Cost ($/sq ft) $110.00 $110.00 $110.00 $110.00 $110.00 $110.00 Total Bridge Cost ($ 1 M) $1.992 $1.975 $1.447 $1.435 $1.822 $1.807 Conclusions HDR recommends the single bridge section and maintaining/extending the median barrier section currently in place to the north of the interchange along I-190. This option alleviates potential hazards of guardrail and other barriers that would be needed to transition to the two bridge section. The single structure also minimizes the project area footprint potentially reducing costs including retaining wall and right of way. Based on preliminary estimated structure costs, the single bridge structure is also slightly more economical. Alternative 1a requires the shortest bridge length, therefore the least expensive structure. Although 1a has the least expensive structure cost, Alternative 2a has the least expensive overall interchange construction cost. Detailed cost estimates for each interchange alternative can be found in the appendix. Once the preferred interchange alternative is selected through the Interchange Modification Justification Report and Environmental Analysis processes, a more detailed cost comparison can be developed to compare single span versus multiple span bridge costs. Page 8