The U.S. Food and Fiber Industry Chapter 2

Similar documents
The state of the farm economy: Some big-picture considerations. Patrick Westhoff

AGEC 105 Spring 2010 Test #1 Capps

Baseline Update for U.S. Farm Income and Government Outlays

Outlook for the 2014 U.S. Farm Economy. Kevin Patrick Farm Economy Branch Resource and Rural Economics Division

Wisconsin Agricultural Economics Outlook Forum

Estimating North Dakota s Economic Base. Randal C. Coon, Dean A. Bangsund, and Nancy M. Hodur *

Australian Beef Financial performance of beef farms, to

2011 Southern Peanut Farmers Conference. Marshall Lamb USDA/ARS National Peanut Research Laboratory Dawson, GA

2011 STATE FFA FARM BUSINESS MANAGEMENT TEST PART 2. Financial Statements (FINPACK Balance Sheets found in the resource information)

John Deere Committed to Those Linked to the Land Market Fundamentals

Focus. Panhandle Model Farms Case Studies of Texas High. Plains Agriculture

Profitability Outlook. Ag Credit Conference October 29, 2014 Roy Black & Dennis Stein Michigan State University

Agricultural Outlook Forum 2016 Trends in Farm Household Income and Assets

THE BENEFITS OF FINANCIAL BENCHMARKING TO FARMERS IN THE UNITED STATES

John Deere. Committed to Those Linked to the Land. Market Fundamentals. Deere & Company September 2013

Appendix I Whole Farm Analysis Procedures and Measures

Measuring Systematic Risk for Crop and Livestock Producers

Hancock Farmland Investor

The Iowa Pork Industry 2008: Patterns and Economic Importance by Daniel Otto and John Lawrence 1

U.S. Farm Sector Profits

AIM-AG Agri-Industry Modeling and Analysis Group 1

Agriculture has historically been an

2017 Tennessee Agricultural Outlook. Aaron Smith Crop Economist University of Tennessee Extension

The Iowa Pork Industry 2003: Patterns and Economic Importance

AGEC 105 Fall 2010 Test #1 Capps (70 questions)

Report on Minnesota Farm Finances. April, 2010

Farm Financial Outlook

National WIC Association

1. Name two specific reasons from course materials why study of agricultural markets is important.

Costs to Produce Milk in Illinois 2016

The Outlook for Grain Markets and Texas Agriculture in Emily Kerr and Michael Plante

Focus. Panhandle Model Farms 2016 Case Studies of Texas. High Plains Agriculture. DeDe Jones Steven Klose

Agricultural Price Change

Report on Minnesota Farm Finances. August, 2009

John Deere. Committed to Those Linked to the Land. Market Fundamentals. Deere & Company August/September 2014

John Deere. Committed to Those Linked to the Land. Market Fundamentals. Deere & Company June/July 2014

National Pork Producers Council

Introduction to Agricultural Economics Fifth Edition

Introduction to Agricultural Economics Fifth Edition

Chuck Danehower Extension Specialist Farm Management Danny Morris Extension Specialist Farm Management

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE ECONOMIC RESEARCH SERVICE August 1972 FCR-83 cooperating with New Mexico State University COSTS NOV

Ohio Farm Financial Conditions and Outlook: Farm Income and Assets, Land Values and Rent, and Farm Financial Stress

Effects of Reducing the Income Cap on Eligibility for Farm Program Payments

Agriculture and Oregon's Economy

Regional Food Systems

Focus. Panhandle Model Farms 2012 Case Studies of Texas. High Plains Agriculture

Costs to Produce Milk in Illinois 2003

Agricultural Outlook Forum Presented: March 1-2, 2007 U.S. Department of Agriculture

Characteristics, Plans, and Opinions of Kentucky Dairy Termination Program Participants

MILK PRODUCTION COSTS in 1998 on Selected WISCONSIN DAIRY FARMS

FARM COSTS AND EXPORTS

Manitoba Economic Highlights

Statement of. Thomas M. Hoenig. President. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City. before the. Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry

Focus. Panhandle Model Farms 2018 Case Studies of Texas. High Plains Agriculture

College of Agriculture, Extension Service in Agriculture and Home Economics FOOD IN OUR SOCIETY

2012 STATE FFA FARM BUSINESS MANAGEMENT TEST PART 2. Financial Statements (FINPACK Balance Sheets found in the resource information)

2012 Farm Outlook. Highlights

Chapter 7. Dairy -- Farm Management Wayne A. Knoblauch, Professor George J. Conneman, Professor Emeritus Cathryn Dymond, Extension Support Specialist

Characterizing U.S. Fruit and Vegetable Production

Agriculture: expansions highlighted developments

Market Fundamentals. August October 2017

Trends in Agricultural Contracts

Changes in Southern Cotton and Peanut Producing Regions

Predicting Fertilizer Prices

SMALL FARMS ARE "REAL" FARMS. John Ikerd University of Missouri

Current Agricultural Economy and Farm Bank Conditions

As Chinese Trade Tensions Build, Do Ohio Producers Need to Worry?

Third Quarter 2012 Earnings Conference Call. 15 August 2012

Purpose and Uses of ARMS Data

Economic Impacts from Increasing Pig Farrowing in Iowa

Module 6: Addressing Opportunity Costs in the Analysis of Economic Impacts across Local Food Systems

TIMELY INFORMATION. Agriculture & Natural Resources AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS AND RURAL SOCIOLOGY, AUBURN UNIVERSITY, AL

CFAES CENTER FOR COOPERATIVES. Trends of U.S. Agricultural Cooperatives ( )

Agricultural Economics

Table 1 Declining number of farms with chickens, increasing cash receipts, Year Farms Cash receipts for with chickens* chickens and

Contribution of Agribusiness to the Idaho Economy, 2011

10/22/2012. Current Land Values & Cash Rental Rates. Nebraska Land Values Know how. Know now.

CONTRIBUTION OF THE ETHANOL INDUSTRY TO THE ECONOMY OF THE UNITED STATES

2008 Illinois Farm Economics Summit The Profitability of Illinois Agriculture: Looking Ahead in Extraordinary Times

Higher Cropland Value from Farm Program Payments: Who Gains? Real estate accounts for more than three-quarters of total

CONTRIBUTION OF THE ETHANOL INDUSTRY TO THE ECONOMY OF THE UNITED STATES

Financial Characteristics of North Dakota Farms


Hog:Corn Ratio What can we learn from the old school?

Still Waiting for the Farm Boom Family Farmers Worse Off Despite High Prices By Timothy A. Wise*

FAPRI-UMC Report December 8, 2005

BioEnergy Policy Brief July 2009 BPB

ECONOMIC IMPACTS ON THE FARM COMMUNITY OF COOPERATIVE OWNERSHIP OF ETHANOL PRODUCTION

Focus. Analyzing the Impact of Drought Conditions on Texas High Plains Agriculture

Fertilizer is a world market commodity, which means that supply

Contribution of Agribusiness to the Idaho Economy, 2013

Financial Characteristics of North Dakota Farms

1979 Food and Agricultural Outlook

The Revenue Program Option in the 2008 U.S. Farm Bill: Evaluating Performance Characteristics of the ACRE Program

Jason Henderson Vice President and Branch Executive Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Omaha Branch April 25, 2012

Farmland Investing: Risks and Opportunities. John R. Farris Founder & President LandFund Partners 70th CFA Institute Annual Conference May 22, 2017

Hancock Farmland Investor

Sponsored by Farm Foundation USDA Office of Energy Policy and New Uses USDA Economic Research Service

2007 Michigan Cash Grain Farm Business Analysis Summary. Eric Wittenberg And Stephen Harsh. Staff Paper December, 2008

Contribution of Agriculture to Oklahoma s Economy: 2015

Transcription:

The U.S. Food and Fiber Industry Chapter 2 CHAPTER 2: TOPICS OF DISCUSSION Indices and nominal versus real values What is the Food and Fiber Industry Changing complexion of production agriculture Physical structure Productivity Profitability Financial structure Sectors within the Food and Fiber Industry Farm input suppliers Food processors, wholesalers and retailers Value added process 1

THE FOOD AND FIBER INDUSTRY... Consists of those business entities that are involved in one fashion or another with the supply of food and fiber to consumers. FOOD & FIBER INDUSTRY (1) FARM INPUT SUPPLY SECTOR (e.g., John Deere, Ralston-Purina) (2) FARM SECTOR (3) PROCESSION & MANUFACTURING SECTOR (e.g., Tyson Foods, Del Monte, Swift) (4) WHOLESALE & RETAIL SECTOR (e.g., Sysco, Kroger, HEB) (5) CONSUMER (us) 2

1 out of every 6 jobs is tied to the food and fiber industry Responsible for roughly 12 to 15 percent of GDP Net Farm Income ($ billion) 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 85.9 78.7 58.5 70.9 87.1 57.0 30% decline Value of Crop Production ($ billion) 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 124.5 114.4 118.9 150.9 182.5 164.2 18% decline Value of Livestock Production ($ billion) 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 124.4 126.5 119.4 138.5 139.7 117.4 22% decline Source: Economics Research Service, USDA (www.ers.usda.gov) 3

Some Key Measurement Topics Output and Price Indices Nominal and Real Expenditures Indices Index a percentage comparison from a fixed point of reference or benchmark. with an index, economists can more easily describe how much, say wheat output for example, has increased or decreased relative to the benchmark or base period. CPI Consumer Price Index WPI Wholesale Price Index Index of prices received or paid by producers Pages 14-15 4

Output and Price Indices Apple Production Price of apples (1000 short tons) Output Index ($/pound) Price index 1985 3,957 0.819 $0.685 0.952 1990 4,828 1.000 $0.719 1.000 1997 5,162 1.069 $0.907 1.261 1990 is the base year Page 14 Output and Price Indices Apple Production Price of apples (1000 short tons) Output Index ($/pound) Price index 1985 3,957 0.819 $0.685 0.952 1990 4,828 1.000 $0.719 1.000 1997 5,162 1.069 $0.907 1.261 1990 is the base year 1.069 = 5,162 4,828 Output 6.9% higher in 1997 than it was in 1990. Page 14 5

Output and Price Indices Apple Production Price of apples (1000 short tons) Output Index ($/pound) Price index 1985 3,957 0.819 $0.685 0.952 1990 4,828 1.000 $0.719 1.000 1997 5,162 1.069 $0.907 1.261 1990 is the base year 1.069 = 5,823 5,512 5,162 4,828 Output 6.9% 6% higher in in 1997 than it it was in 1990. 1.261 = 0.907 0.719 Price 26.1% higher in 1997 that it was in 1990. Page 14 6

Nominal and Real Expenditures for Food Eaten Away From Home Nominal Expenditures CPI Real Expenditures (billion dollars) 1982-84=1.00 (billion dollars) 1980 120.296 0.824 145.990 1985 168.831 1.076 156.906 1990 248.464 1.307 190.102 1995 302.419 1.569 198.437 1982-84 average is the base year for the CPI Page 15 7

Nominal and Real Expenditures for Food Eaten Away From Home Nominal Expenditures CPI Real Expenditures (billion dollars) 1982-84=1.00 (billion dollars) 1980 120.296 0.824 145.990 1985 168.831 1.076 156.906 1990 248.464 1.307 190.102 1995 302.419 1.569 198.437 1982-84 average is the base year for the CPI CPI was 56.9% higher in 1995 than it was in 1982-84 period Page 15 Nominal and Real Expenditures for Food Eaten Away From Home Nominal Expenditures CPI Real Expenditures (billion dollars) 1982-84=1.00 (billion dollars) 1980 120.296 0.824 145.990 1985 168.831 1.076 156.906 1990 248.464 1.307 190.102 1995 302.419 1.569 198.437 1982-84 average is the base year for the CPI CPI was 56.9% higher in 1995 than it was in 1982-84 period Page 15 198.437 = 302.419 1.569 The increasing CPI eroded the purchasing power of the dollar. 8

Characteristics of the Food and Fiber System The Nation s food and fiber system consists of various sectors that provide food and fiber products to their ultimate consumer. Page 16 9

Changing Complexion of Farming Physical structure Fewer number of farms but larger-sized farms Increasing use of capital relative to labor Increasing productivity or output per unit of input Financial structure and performance Nominal net farm income growth offset by inflation Declining debt use strengthens equity position Recovering real estate values after sharp declines during the financial crises in the mid-1980s Pages 17-26 Important Facts Number of farms roughly 2.1 million at present Peak 1935 6.8 million farms Average size of the US farm between 400 and 500 acres today Since WWII, average farm size has doubled 10

Fig. 2.2A Trends in the number of Farms, 1990 to 2007 2,220,000 2,200,000 NUMBEROFFARMS Number of Farms 2,180,000 2,160,000 2,140,000 2,120,000 2,100,000 2,080,000 2,060,000 90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 Fig. 2.2B Trends in the average size of farms, 1990 to 2007 465 460 Number of Farms 455 450 445 440 435 430 90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 11

Specialization, Diversification, Organization, and Contracting Share of the 50,000 largest farms (2%) account for roughly 50% of total sales 56% of US farms have sales < $10,000 Concentration of production may be more of a critical issue than the decline in the number of farms; 10% of U.S. farms account for 75% of value of production The number of farms has been holding steady at 2.1 million for the past 10 years Specialization, Diversification, Organization, and Contracting US farms tend to be specialized rather than diversified About half of US farms produce one commodity ¾ of farms with sales > $0.5 million produce no more than three commodities 60 percent of all farms are comprised of retired operators and operators who also work off the farm Average age of farm operator is in the mid 50s today, 48 in 1940 12

Specialization, Diversification, Organization, and Contracting Corporate farms versus family farms Family-owned farms are NOT losing their share of US agriculture to non-farm corporations US farms are most organized as individual operations; farms organized as partnerships are about 5 percent of US farms; farms organized as corporations are roughly 3 percent of US farms But partnerships and corporations account for roughly 40 percent of the value of production Specialization, Diversification, Organization, and Contracting Over the past 40 years, farmers have become LESS dependent on terminal markets and spot pricing Roughly 10 percent of farms today rely on production and marketing contracts, and these farms account for 52 percent of agricultural production 90 percent of US farms today have no production and marketing contracts 13

A Note on Farm Inputs Land, Labor, Capital, Materials Capital refers to durable equipment and structures Labor Hired and Self-Employed Materials Energy, chemicals, and purchased services A Note on Farm Inputs Total farm input, in the aggregate, has remained relatively stable since WWII Labor on the decline, materials on the rise Capital substituted for labor; use of capital inputs peaked around 1980 and then declined from 1981 to 1995; since 1996 capital has leveled off 14

Fig. 2.3 A Index of total farm inputs used in agricultural production, 1948 to 2006 (1996=1.00) 1.20 TOTALFARMINPUT 1.15 Indices 1.10 1.05 1.00 0.95 0.90 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 00 05 Fig. 2.3B Index of capital, labor, and materials used in agricultural production, 1948 to 2006 3.5 (1996=1.00) 3.0 2.5 Indices 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 00 05 Capital Labor Materials 15

A Note on Productivity Productivity defined as output per unit of input Productivity has increased dramatically since WWII Output has been on the rise due primarily to development and use of technology and biotechnology (e.g. BST) Growth rates in livestock and crop output have been about the same; average growth rate is 2 percent per year A Note on Productivity US farmers have adopted widely genetically-engineered (GE) crops since their introduction in 1996 Examples soybeans and cotton genetically-engineered with herbicidetolerant traits; cotton and corn with insectresistant traits 16

Figure 2.4. Index of agricultural productivity, 1948 to 2006 (1996=1.00) 1.2 1.1 1.0 Indices 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 00 05 Figure 2.5 A Index of total output from the farm sector, 1948 to 2006 (1996=1.00) Indices 1.2 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 00 05 17

Figure 2.5 B Index of output associated with livestock products, 1948 to 2006 (1996=1.00) 1.2 1.1 1.0 Indices 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 00 05 Figure 2.5 C Index of output associated with crops, 1948 to 2006 (1996=1.00) 1.2 1.1 1.0 0.9 Indices 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 00 05 18

Farm Profitability Cash receipts from farm marketings + Government payments + Other income from farm sources = Gross farm income Production expenses = Nominal net farm income Broadly-based price deflator = Real net farm income Pages 23-24 Figure 2.6 A Gross farm income and production expenses, 1949 to 2007 350 300 250 Billion $ 200 150 100 50 0 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 00 05 Gross Farm Income Production Expenses 19

Figure 2.6 B Nominal and Real Net Farm Income, 1949 to 2007 90 80 70 Billion $ 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 00 05 Net Farm Income Real Net Farm Income Financial Structure Value of real estate assets + Value of nonreal estate assets + Value of financial assets = Total assets Total liabilities or debt = Equity or net worth Pages 25-26 20

Figure 2.7 A Real Estate Assets and Non-real Estate Assets 1960 to 2006 2,000 1,600 Nominal Billions of dollars $ 1,200 800 400 0 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 00 Real Estate Assets Non-real Estate Assets 05 Figure 2.7 B Farm assets and liabilities, 1960 to 2007 2,400 2,000 Nominal Billions of dollars $ 1,600 1,200 800 400 0 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 00 05 Farm Assets Liabilities 21

Figure 2.7 C Equity associated with the farm sector, 1960 to 2007 2,400 2,000 Billion $ 1,600 1,200 800 400 0 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 00 05 Figure 2.7 D Debt-to-asset ratio associated with the farm sector, 1960 to 2007 24 22 20 Percent % 18 16 14 12 10 8 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 00 05 22

Figure 2.7 E Debt-to-equity ratio associated with the farm sector, 1960 to 2007 30.0 27.5 25.0 22.5 Percent % 20.0 17.5 15.0 12.5 10.0 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 00 05 A Note on Profitability Nominal net farm income was about $57 billion in 2009; over the period 2004 to 2009, range $58.5 billion (2006) to 87.1 billion (2008) Since the 1930s, the worst year in terms of lowest real net farm income was 1983 In 2007, farm assets were roughly $2.2 trillion; farm liabilities were on the order of $200 billion; thus equity in the farm sector was $2 trillion, largely due to real estate assets in 2007. 23

A Note on Profitability Debt-to-asset ratio peaked at 22 percent in 1985; currently this ratio is about 10 percent Debt-to-equity ratio peaked at 28 percent in 1985; currently this ratio is about 10 percent Relative Importance of Farm Input Expenditures Page 27 24

Beyond the Farm Gate TABLE 2.4 Value Added for a Loaf of Bread Page 30 25

Figure 2.9 Share of the food dollar for food eaten at home and for food eaten away from home. Percent % 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 91 89 9 11 87 13 83 17 80 20 76 24 74 26 67 33 61 39 Food at home Food away from home 52 52 52 52 51 51 51 51 48 48 48 48 49 49 49 49 0 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Source: USDA Economic Research Service Figure 2.10 Percentage of disposable personal income spent on food, 1929 to 2007 28 24 Percent % 20 16 12 8 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 26

Figure 2.11 Illustration of Engel s Law using annual data from 1929 to 2007 28 24 Share of Total Food 20 16 12 8 0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 DPI Figure 2.14 The marketing bill share and the farm value share of consumer food expenditures, 1950 to 2006 90 80 70 Percent % 60 50 40 30 20 10 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 00 05 Farm Value Share Marketing Bill Share 27

What a Dollar Spent for Food Typically Pays for Only 20 cents of each dollar spent on food products goes to farmers and ranchers Page 32 28