Temperament and Cattle Performance Montana Nutrition Conference 2016 Challenges and Opportunities of Cow Herd Expansion Reinaldo F. Cooke Oregon State University EOARC, Burns What is Temperament? Behavioral responses of cattle when exposed to human handling As cattle temperament worsens Response to human contact becomes more excitable Selection for temperament (docility) Heritable trait - Up to h 2 = 0.50 Mainly for safety reasons Productive implications being established 1
How to assess temperament? Chute Score Cattle are individually restrained in the chute Scored in 1-5 scale according to behavior 1. Calm with no movement 2. Restless movement 3. Frequent movement with vocalization 4. Constant movement, vocalization, shaking of chute 5. Violent and continuous struggling 2
How to assess temperament? Exit Velocity or Score Speed of cattle after it leaves the chute Methods for measurement Electronic Establish distance to be traveled by the animal (feet) Measure time (chronometer, infrared sensor in seconds) Classify animals according to speed (feet/second) Visual 1. Walks away from the chute 2. Trots away from the chute 3. Runs away from the chute 3
How to assess temperament? Chute Score and Exit Velocity Use scores individually Average both scores = Temperament Score n = 430 r = 0.60 P < 0.01 Cooke et al. (2010) How to assess temperament? Based on Temperament Score Adequate temperament (TS 3) Excitable temperament (TS > 3) Maintain some temperament in the herd Without impairing safety and productive traits Cow-calf systems Pairs survive challenges of extensive environments Feedlot systems Competition for bunk space 4
Factors that affect temperament Sex Females are more temperamental Age Young animals are more temperamental Production system Range cattle are more temperamental Breed type Greatest source of variation Bos indicus cattle are more temperamental Temperament x Production What s the relationship? Reducing feed intake and nutritional status? Physiological effects? Fear-related stress responses Including CRH ACTH - cortisol axis Disrupt secretory activity of repro glands Breakdown of muscle and fat tissues = Nutrient sink = feed efficiency ADG Genetic effects? Deserves further investigation 5
Temperament x Cortisol Brangus/Braford replacement heifers Plasma cortisol, ng/ml 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 n = 74 r = 0.58 P < 0.01 1 2 3 4 5 Temperament score Cooke et al. (2009) Temperament x Cortisol Nelore (Bos indicus) Steers Plasma cortisol, ng/ml 45 42 39 36 33 30 P < 0.01 n = 44 Adequate ( 3) Excitable (> 3) Francisco et al., 2012 6
Plasma cortisol, ng/ml 30.0 25.0 20.0 15.0 10.0 5.0 Temperament x Cortisol Angus x Hereford mature cows P < 0.01 n = 450 0.0 Cooke et al., 2012 1 2 3 4 Temperament Score Temperament x Cortisol Using hair cortisol as parameter Handling for blood collection impacts cortisol Elevated cortisol during handling only? Cortisol is accumulated in the hair Retrospective assessment of blood cortisol (30 d) 7
Hair cortisol, pg/mg of hair 25 20 15 10 5 Temperament x Cortisol Using hair cortisol as parameter P = 0.04 Adequate ( 3) Excitable (> 3) Basal plasma cortisol concentrations are greater (2x) in cattle with excitable temperament Cooke et al., 2016 Temperament x Reproduction 8
Cortisol, ng/ml Temperament x Reproduction Physiological effects 80.0 70.0 60.0 50.0 40.0 30.0 20.0 10.0 0.0 10.0 Mean (ng/ml) Pulses/4h P < 0.01 9.0 P < 0.01 Acclimated Non-acclimated adapted from Echternkamp (1984) Acclimated to human handling = calm temperament Plasma LH 8.0 7.0 6.0 5.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 Acclimated Non-acclimated Temperament x Reproduction Heifers pubertal by 12 mo of age Average from weaning to beginning of breeding season Temperament Score (1 to 5) 5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 P < 0.05 Plasma cortisol, ng/ml 60 50 40 30 20 10 P < 0.05 1.0 Pubertal adapted from Cooke et al, (2009) Non-pubertal 0 Pubertal Non-pubertal 9
Probability of pregnancy, % Temperament x Reproduction Braford mature cows 100 80 60 40 20 0 Cooke et al. (2009) Assessed at beginning of breeding season (90-d bull only) Linear effect; P < 0.01, n = 400 1 2 3 4 5 Temperament score Temperament x Reproduction Nelore mature cows Assessed at fixed time AI Cooke et al. (2011) Temperament Score 10
Cooke et al. (2011) Temperament x Reproduction Angus x Hereford mature cows Assessed at beginning of breeding season (FTAI + 50-d bull) Pregnancy rates, % 100 95 90 85 80 P = 0.03, n = 433 94.6 88.7 Adequate ( 3) Excitable (> 3) Cooke et al. (2010) 11
Temperament x Reproduction Angus x Hereford mature cows Weaning rate 100 P = 0.09, n = 433 Weaning rate, % 95 90 85 80 90.0 83.9 Adequate ( 3) Excitable (> 3) Cooke et al. (2012) Temperament x Reproduction Angus x Hereford mature cows Calf weaning age Weaning age, days 225 215 205 195 185 175 Cooke et al. (2012) P = 0.45 201 203 Adequate ( 3) Excitable (> 3) 12
Temperament x Reproduction Angus x Hereford mature cows Calf weaning BW Weaning BW, lbs 600 580 560 540 520 P = 0.71 545 544 500 Cooke et al. (2012) Adequate (< 3) Excitable (> 3) Temperament Temperament x Reproduction Angus x Hereford mature cows Lbs of weaned calf per cow exposed to breeding Lbs of weaned calf/cow 500 480 460 440 420 400 490 35 lbs difference @ 180/ctw = U$ 63.00 455 P = 0.08 Adequate (< 3) Excitable (> 3) Cooke et al. (2012) Temperament 13
Temperament x Reproduction Excitable temperament is detrimental to: Reproductive performance of females Independent of breed But how? Nutritional status was accounted in studies Physiological effects (cortisol, what else?) Genetic relationship? Still unknown Adequate temperament of the cowherd Benefit production in cow-calf operations Temperament x Feedlot 14
Temperament is a heritable trait Calf temperament x Production Angus x Hereford calves CALF temperament assessed at weaning Feedlot ADG, lbs/d 3.00 2.80 2.60 2.40 2.20 2.80 P = 0.21 n = 200 2.40 2.00 Francisco et al. (2012) Adequate ( 3) Excitable (> 3) 15
Calf temperament x Production Angus x Hereford calves CALF temperament assessed at weaning P = 0.09 814 798 Francisco et al. (2012) Calf temperament x Production Angus x Hereford calves CALF temperament assessed at weaning Carcass value, U$ 1,330 1,320 1,310 1,300 1,290 1,280 1,270 1,260 1,250 1,240 Francisco et al. (2012) P = 0.07 1,872 1,835 Adequate ( 3) Excitable (> 3) 16
Feedlot ADG, lbs/d 3.50 3.00 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 0.00 Temperament x Feedlot Nelore steers Steer temperament at feedlot entry (109 days) 2.90 P = 0.02, n = 50 2.30 Adequate ( 3) Excitable (> 3) Francisco et al. (2012) Feed intake, lbs/d 21.5 21.0 20.5 20.0 19.5 19.0 18.5 18.0 Temperament x Feedlot Nelore steers Steer temperament at feedlot entry (109 days) 9.4 P = 0.12, n = 50 8.8 Adequate ( 3) Excitable (> 3) Francisco et al. (2012) 17
Feed efficiency, G:F 0.16 0.14 0.12 0.10 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 0.00 Temperament x Feedlot Nelore steers Steer temperament at feedlot entry (109 days) 0.138 P = 0.03, n = 50 0.119 Adequate ( 3) Excitable (> 3) Francisco et al. (2012) Bruises\carcass 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 Temperament x Feedlot Nelore steers Steer temperament at feedlot entry (109 days) P = 0.05, n = 50 0.6 1.3 Adequate ( 3) Excitable (> 3) Francisco et al. (2012) 18
Temperament x Feedlot Nelore steers Steer temperament at feedlot entry (109 days) Intramuscular Fat, % 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 2.66 Standard 2.54% P = 0.05, n = 50 2.28 0.0 Adequate ( 3) Excitable (> 3) Francisco et al. (2012) Temperament x Feedlot Gain Excitable temperament is detrimental to: Bos taurus Feedlot performance Carcass weight = carcass value Bos indicus Feedlot performance and efficiency Carcass quality Other research groups (various breeds) Feedlot performance, health, vaccine response Carcass quality (marbling, tenderness) 19
Conclusions Excitable temperament impacts: Reproductive and overall efficiency of females Cow-calf production efficiency Performance and carcass quality of feeder cattle Feedlot production efficiency Overall productivity of the beef industry Independent of breed So, what is the connection? Behavioral and physiological effects Genetic relationships? Conclusions Strategies to improve herd temperament Imperative to enhance beef production efficiency Temperament as selection/culling criteria Selection of sires Culling aggressive and unproductive females Maintain some temperament in the herd Adequate handling of cattle Aggressive and docile animals Acclimation of young cattle to human interaction 20
Improving Temperament Acclimate cattle to human handling Research studies conducted at UF and EOARC Grazing heifers UF = Brangus/Braford OSU = Angus x Hereford Exposed or not to acclimation after weaning 4 weeks total Brought to the cowpens 3x/week Exposed to common handling procedures Growth, temperament, and reproduction 21
Acclimation of Heifers - OSU After the acclimation process 3.0 2.5 Acclimated Control P < 0.01 Exit velocity, m/s 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 Pre-acclimation Day of the study Post-acclimation Cooke et al. (2012) 22
Acclimation of Heifers - OSU After the acclimation process Plasma cortisol, ng/ml 45.0 40.0 35.0 30.0 25.0 20.0 15.0 10.0 5.0 0.0 Cooke et al. (2012) Acclimated Control P < 0.01 Pre-acclimation Post-acclimation Day of the study Acclimation of Heifers - OSU After the acclimation process Cooke et al. (2012) 23
Acclimation of Heifers Acclimation of heifers to human handling Decreased cortisol concentrations Hastened reproductive development Independent of breed type Effects on mature cows? No positive effects detected Cows often on extensive conditions Improve temperament of mature cowherd Include temperament in selection/culling criteria Conclusions Excitable temperament is detrimental to: Overall productivity of beef operations How? Independent of breed type Physiological + Genetic effects Additional research needed Improve temperament of the cowherd Benefit production in beef operations Selection for temperament / acclimation to handling Environment (stress situations, handling, predators) 24
Thank you for your attention Oregon State University Eastern Oregon Agricultural Research Center, Burns 25