Reproduction is the single most important factor associated with the economic success of the cow/calf producer

Similar documents
Beef Cattle Energetics

Classes of Livestock. Numbers to Remember. Crude Protein. Nutrition for the Cow-calf. Factors influencing Requirements

Animal and Forage Interactions in Beef Systems

3-Step Body Condition Scoring (BCS) Guide

Developing strategy - Protein

Nutrition (young/old) - Cattle Score (male/female)

9/3/11. Joplin/newsroom.html. Implications of nutritional management for beef cow/calf systems

REPLACEMENT HEIFER DEVELOPMENT & NUTRITION

Increase Profit: Feeding Cows by Body Condition and Production Potential

NUTRITIONAL IINFLUENCES ON REPRODUCTION. Scott Lake. Department of Animal Science University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY

Effects of Supplemental Undegradable Protein on the Performance of Fall-Calving Cows Grazing Dormant Native Range

Body Condition, Nutrition and Reproduction of Beef Cows

Forage Quality Influences Beef Cow Performance and Reproduction

Management and Supplementation Strategies to Improve Reproduction of Beef Cattle on Fescue. John B. Hall Extension Beef Specialist Virginia Tech

MATCHING FORAGES WITH LIVESTOCK NEEDS

Effects of a High-linoleic Sunflower Seed Supplement on Performance and Reproduction of Primiparous Beef Cows and their Calves

Outline. Heifers selection. Selection. Maternal Traits. Range Beef Cow Symposium, Dec. 3-5, /5/13. rangebeefcow.com 1

Comparison of target breeding weight and breeding date for replacement beef heifers and effects on subsequent reproduction and calf performance 1

Got Milk? An Economic Look at Cow Size and Milk. July 13 th, 2015

Phase-Feeding the Beef Herd for Improved Feed Utilization 1

Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle

Matching Cow Type to the Nutritional Environment

Body Condition: Implications for Managing Beef Cows

REPRODUCTION AND BREEDING Effects of Body Condition and Energy Intake on Reproduction of Beef Cows

Managing Body Condition to Improve Reproductive Efficiency in Beef Cows

Cow Condition and Reproductive Performance

Managing Body Condition Score to Improve Reproductive Efficiency in Postpartum Beef Cows.

Beef Cattle Management Update

Section 5: Production Management

Proceedings, The Range Beef Cow Symposium XVIII December 9, 10 and 11, 2003, Mitchell, Nebraska

EFFECTS OF EARLY-WEANING AND BODY CONDITION SCORE (BCS) AT CALVING ON PERFORMANCE OF SPRING CALVING COWS

Prepartum and Postpartum Nutritional Management to Optimize Fertility in Beef Cattle

CHALLENGES FOR IMPROVING CALF CROP

Impact of Selection for Improved Feed Efficiency. Phillip Lancaster UF/IFAS Range Cattle Research and Education Center

Beef Cattle Management Update

Raising the Bar on Calf & Heifer Feeding & Management. Jim Barmore, M.Sc., PAS Nutrition & Management Consulting Verona, WI

Proceedings, Applied Reproductive Strategies in Beef Cattle November 1 and 2, 2005, Lexington, Kentucky ESTRUS SYNCHRONIZATION SYSTEMS - COWS

Measuring Cow Efficiency in the Herd. Ryon S. Walker Livestock Consultant Noble Research Institute

Effects of Early and Late Fall Calving of Beef Cows on Gestation Length and Pregnancy Rate

Real-Life Implementation of Controlled Breeding Season

Body Condition Scoring Beef Cows:

Reproductive Management of Commercial Beef Cows. Ted G. Dyer, Extension Animal Scientist

Proceedings, State of Beef Conference November 7 and 8, 2018, North Platte, Nebraska COW SIZE AND COWHERD EFFICIENCY. Introduction

Relationship of Cow Size, Requirements, and Production Issues. Dr. Matt Hersom UF/IFAS Department of Animal Sciences

OSU CowCulator. A Tool for Evaluating Beef Cow Diets. Instructions for Use 1. Oregon State University. Beef Cattle Sciences. Introduction BEEF108

THE EFFECTS OF CONDITION SCORE ON THE PERFORMANCE OF EARLY LACTATION HOLSTEIN COWS

Heifer rearing cost: Critical control points

FEED EFFICIENCY IN THE RANGE BEEF COW: WHAT SHOULD WE BE LOOKING AT?

Relationship of Cow Size, Cow Requirements, and Production Issues

Beef Cattle Handbook

Relationship of Cow Size to Nutrient Requirements and Production Management Issues 1

Canola Meal & The Beef Industry. J. McKinnon & K. Wallburger University of Saskatchewan & B. Doig Saskatchewan Agriculture & Food

Reproductive Management in Beef Herds. Marcos G. Colazo Dairy Research Scientist Alberta Agriculture & Rural Development Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

GENETIC IMPROVEMENT FOR FORAGE USE GENETIC IMPROVEMENT PRINCIPLES FOR THE COWHERD 1/2/2014. Qualifications. Matt Spangler University of Nebraska

FACTORS INFLUENCING THE INITIATION OF ESTROUS CYCLES AND EXPRESSION OF ESTRUS IN BEEF COWS. J.S. Stevenson

Bath County Extension Agent for Agriculture and Natural Resources. January American Forage and Grassland Meeting Louisville

2013 Georgia Grazing School:

The Modern Range Cow has Greater Nutrient Demand than the Old Style Range Cow

Using Confinement as a Component in Beef Production Systems. Karla H. Jenkins, Shelby Gardine, Jason Warner, Terry Klopfenstein, Rick Rasby

Replacement Heifer Development: Part II - Nutrition

EC Body Condition Scoring Beef Cows: A Tool for Managing the Nutrition Program for Beef Herds

Relationship of Cow Size, Cow Requirements, and Production Issues

Changes In Growth Performance Of Steers And Nutritive Value Of Wheat Pasture From Fall/Winter Grazing To Graze-Out

Effects of Feeding Perennial Peanut Hay on Growth, Development, Attainment of Puberty, and Fertility in Beef Replacement Heifers

Effect of Body Weight Gain and Bovine Somatotropin Treatment on Plasma Concentrations of IGF-I in Postpartum Beef Cows

Proceedings, The Range Beef Cow Symposium XX December 11, 12 and 13, 2007 Fort Collins, Colorado HEIFER DEVELOPMENT THEN AND NOW

Nancy Cameron Chair Update: 2018 Montana Nutrition Conference & Livestock Forum

Intensified Cow/Calf Production Systems in the Southern Great Plains

Dr. Matt Hersom Dept. of Animal Sciences

Body Condition. The Beef Cow s Energy Gauge

Western Canadian Cow-Calf Survey

Comparison of Weaning System on Cow-Calf Performance and Intake

MANAGING NUTRITIONAL CHALLENGES TO REPRODUCTION

Heifer Management. by Brian Freking Beef Progress Report-1

Cost Effective Replacement Heifers

Opportunities to Improve Feed Efficiency of Beef Production

Beef Cattle Handbook

SUPPLEMENTAL PROTEIN LEVELS FOR SPRING CALVING COWS GRAZING OLD WORLD BLUESTEM OR TALLGRASS PRAIRIE

Selecting and Sourcing Replacement Heifers

co-products ethanol for cattle Distillers Grains for Beef Cows

Can We Modify Future Beef Calf Performance by Changing Cow Nutrition During Gestation?

Long Calving Seasons. Problems and Solutions

Effects of Prepartum Dried Distillers Supplementation on the Performance of Fescue Grazed Fall-Calving Cows and Subsequent Steer Feedlot Performance

Selection and Development of Replacement Heifers

IMPACTS OF ESTROUS SYNCHRONIZATION ON COWHERD PERFORMANCE

FORAGE SYSTEMS TO REDUCE THE WINTER FEEDING PERIOD. Gerald W. Evers

Managing Beef Cow Efficiency 1

The Value of Improving the Performance of your Cow-Calf Operation

The Optimal Cow Size for Intermountain Cow- Calf Operations: The Impact of Public Grazing Fees on the Optimal Cow Size

Goal Oriented Use of Genetic Prediction

Agricultural Science Past Exam Questions Animal Production Higher Level

Pre-Weaning Mortality 7.8% average death loss on heifers born alive. Colostrum Management. Managing Calf Care. Colostrum Quality. Colostrum Quantity

A Comparison of Milk Production In

Forage Seminar Cut Bank, MT - December 16, 2014

A Discussion Where We Have Been Where We Are Where We Are Going

What Hay Is Right For Your Livestock. Tom Gallagher Capital Area Agriculture Horticulture Program Livestock Specialist

Using EPDs in a Commercial Herd

Getting Large Numbers of Dairy Heifers Bred AI

Effects of heat stress on reproduction in cattle

Precision Feeding Dairy Heifers Using feed efficiency principles and basic animal physiology to feed heifers correctly and cheaper

Transcription:

NUTRITIONAL INFLUENCES ON REPRODUCTION: ENERGY AND PROTEIN Reproduction is the single most important factor associated with the economic success of the cow/calf producer Applied Reproductive Strategies in Beef Cattle Sioux Falls, SD Dec. 4, 2012 Scott Lake, Beef Cattle Extension Specialist Department of Animal Science, University of Wyoming Management cycle of a beef cow Factors that affect the postpartum interval To have 1 calve every 365 days, a cow has ~83 days from calving to conceive. The interval of postpartum anestrus will dictate if she can accomplish this The postpartum interval is dependent upon many factors and is very difficult to predict. Calving Season Breeding Season Calving Season Breeding Season -Nutrition -Age -Calving difficulty -Calving season -Genetics -Suckling of calf -Body Condition (fatness) Gestating Cows Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept % Anestrus 60 50 40 30 20 10 Anestrus in US beef cattle at start of synchronization Range 8-69% 2212 cows 12 locations 69 dpp Range 17-67% 851 cows 6 locations 56 dpp % %+$ *)$ *+$ ')$ '+$ &)$ &+$ )$ +$./01$2345467$8/$.359:$;<=$ *!")$ '#")$ '!"&$ &("#$ &'"#$ #"%$!"#$ &,'+$ '&,%+$ %&,!+$!&,-+$ -&,&++$ &+&,&'+$ &'&,&%+$ 0 Beef Cows Beef Cows Lucy et al., 2001; Larson et al., 2006 Effect of calving date on the number of cows calving the following year (adapted from Burris and Priode, 1958) 1

Factors effecting reproduction in beef cows #1 is Nutrition Fat reserves (BCS) at calving and start of the breeding season Weight loss between calving and breeding = long PPI Recommendations: Mature cows: BCS 5-5.5 at calving and maintaining this BCS during the breeding season 2 year-old cows: BCS 5.5-6 at calving and maintaining this BCS during the breeding season BCS is a practical indicator of nutritional status and its effect on reproduction in the postpartum cow Short et al., 1990; Williams, 1990; Wagner et al., 1988; Randel, 1990 Body Condition Scores 1 - Emaciated 2 - Very thin 3 - Thin 4 - Moderately thin 5 - Moderate (ideal) 6 - Moderately fleshy 7 - Fleshy 8 - Very fleshy 9 - Obese BCS 3: To Thin BCS 5: Ideal BCS 8: To Fat BCS Examples Percent Estimates of body fat in beef cows relative to body condition score 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Fat (% of carcass) Fat Cover (in) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Body Condition score 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 Inches Energy Reserves and Reproduction Rapid weight gain is difficult after calving especially late calving cows need to reach target by calving Cows in good to moderate BCS can lose some weight (BCS) after calving Thin cows at calving must have postpartum E Economics (sell or feed?) 2

BCS and the postpartum interval Relationship of BCS with Cow/Calf Performance in Beef Cows Effect of body condition score (BCS) at calving on postpartum interval. Postpartum BCS Interval 3 88.5 4 69.7 5 59.4 6 51.7 7 30.6 % Rebred 100 Adapted from Houghton et al., 1990 40 90 80 70 60 50 BCS < 4 BCS 5 BCS > 6 Adapted from G. Selk, Oklahoma State Univ. BCS Preg % Calving Interval, d Calf ADG, lbs Calf WW, lbs 3 43 414 1.6 374 4 61 381 1.75 460 5 86 364 1.85 514 6 93 364 1.85 514 Kunkle, 1994 Net Energy (NE) Requirements for a 1200 lb March Calving Cow with 23 lbs/day Peak Milk Production NE (Mcal/day) 20 15 10 5 0 Calve 3 5 Wean 9 11 NRC (1996) Months After Calving NEEDED WEIGHT GAINS IN MATURE PREGNANT COWS IN DIFFERENT BODY CONDITIONS Body Condition Wt. Gain Needed to Calving, lbs. Calf Fluids At Needed at And Body Days to Weaning Calving Membrane Weight Total Calving ADG 5 5 100 0 100 120.8 4 5 100 80 180 120 1.5 3 5 100 160 260 180.9 3 5 100 160 260 150 1.7 3 5 100 160 260 120 2.2 3 5 100 160 260 90 2.9 Wiltbank, 1982. NEEDED WEIGHT GAIN IN MATURE, LACTATING COWS IN DIFFERENT BODY CONDITIONS Body Condition Wt. Gain Needed to Breeding, lbs. Needed at Body Days to At Calving Breeding Weight Breeding ADG 5 5 0 60 0.0 4 5 80 60 1.3 3 5 160 80 2.0 3 5 160 60 2.7 3 5 160 40 4.0 Wiltbank, 1982. Adjusting Energy and Protein NE m Requirements, Mcal/d (1200 lb cow) Mid-gestation 8.68 (25% Late- gestation 10.83 increase) Early Lactation (10 lb milk) 12.09 Early Lactation (20 lb milk) 15.48 (80% increase) CP Requirements, lb/d (1200 lb cow) Mid-gestation 1.4 Late- gestation 1.7 Early Lactation (10 lb milk) 2.1 Early Lactation (20 lb milk) 2.7 (25% increase) (95% increase) 3

Use Body Condition as a Wake-up Call Breed, Cow Type and Maintenance Milk production potential, NE m (Mcal / W. 75 ) requirements Ferrell and Jenkins (1984) Ferrell and Jenkins (1985) Anderson (1980) Lemenager et al. (1980) Byers (1982) NRC (1996) BCS Change for Cows With High or Low Milk Production During Summer Grazing Effect of Nutrition on Reproduction Body condition score change 1 0.5 0 (0.5) Low High Most cases of protein, mineral, and vitamin deficiencies are confounded with ENERGY Lemenager et al., 1991 (1) April 10 On grass June 19 Aug 5 Sept 20 Weaning Adams et al. 1993 Sub-Maintenance ENERGY Delayed onset of puberty PPI effects of suckling on anestrus onset/duration of seasonal anestrus Source of Energy Several studies have examined source of energy on reproduction. As long as CP & TDN req. are met. Forage/silage=CGF=SH=WM=CS Lemenager et al., 1991; Dunn and Moss, 1992 Fat Carbohydrates 4

Importance of Fats Fats in Beef Cow Diets Needed by all animals Cell walls Hormones Nerves Most fatty acids are synthesized, but a few are essential Linoleic acid most important Fat is generally only 2 % of diet Limited to 5 to 8 % of diet Increasing fat in diet of cycling heifers and postpartum cows resulted in: Increased progesterone longer CL lifespan Increased number of follicles Heifers High fat diet tended to increase the number of heifers pregnant to AI. Effect appears to be dependent on length of exposure. Inadequate protein intake can result in reduced pregnancy rates in cows receiving diets containing equal energy. High fat increased percentage of thin 1 st calf heifers cycling at the start of the breeding season. Sasser et al., 1989 Protein and Reproduction Metabolizable Protein Equal energy, CP deficiency calving difficulty uterus involution presence of first ovarian follicle PPI no. of females showing estrus 1 st service and overall pregnancy rate CP bypass UIP energy (TDN) DIP (ammonia) MCP MP Sasser et al. 1988 5

Protein Supplementation forage intake and digestibility reproduction (Caton et al., 1988; Short et al., 1990; Wheeler et al., 2002) After meeting DIP requirement, added UIP May PPI and weight loss (Wiley et al., 1991; Appeddu et al., 1996; Anderson et al., 1996) May conception rate (Triplett et al., 1995; McCormick et al., 1999) Protein Balancing for MP vs. CP pre-calving pregnancy rate in 1 st calf heifers No effect on BW or BCS More effective in thinner heifers Patterson et al., 2003 Deficiencies Energy deficiency (65%): young females calf birth weights (Corah et al., 1975) weaning wt. (Corah et al., 1975) Protein deficiency: cows Birth weight (Carsten et al., 1987) Birth weight (Martin et al., 2007) Weaning wt. (Beaty et al., 1994, Martin et al., 2007) pregnancy rate, later calving (Martin et al., 2007) Under practical management conditions, much of the variation in reproductive performance of beef cows may be accounted for by differences in total energy intake and body condition. Lemenager et al., 1991 Slow down.. Thank you Scott Lake Dept. of Animal Science University of Wyoming scotlake@uwyo.edu 307-766-3892 (office) 307-460-8129 (cell) 6

Supplemental Protein Protein Availability Needed when CP intake is below requirements 7 to 10 % Improves forage digestibility Enhances energy intake Beneficial effects on: Cow weight & BCS Cow reproduction Calf health Effect of prepartum supplementation to meet metabolizable protein (MP) or crude protein (CP) requirements on pregnancy rates in two-year-old cows Location A Location B Year MP req. CP req. MP req. CP req. 1997-98 c 95 95 84 75 1998-99 d 95 88 89 85 apatterson et al., 2003. btreatment Year Location interaction (P =.07). ctreatments differ at Location B (P =.01). dtreatments differ at Location A (P =.01) and Location B (P =. 15) What about RDP? High level of RDP are associated with high NH 3 Inconsistent effects on reproduction decreased pregnancy rates abnormal follicular development poor oocyte quality uterine effects? Interaction with energy intake RUP Could it Help? Protein supplementation is a major concern in some areas of the Southeast and South Central states. RUP increases performance in steers and dairy cows Could it be of benefit in reproductively active beef females? Adding RUP to Cow and Heifer Diets 30% of protein as RUP decreased PP interval and increased number of first calf heifers bred in 1st 21 d of breeding season. 25% but not 50% RUP decreased PP interval in mature cows 250 g per head per day of RUP had no effect on replacement heifers 7

Effect of RUP on Developing Replacement Heifers RUP (Grams per day) 0 100 ADG, lb. 1.86 2.1 Pelvic Area 150.6 162.8 % Cycling 54.0 77.0 Graham, 1998 Nutritional Management for Proper Reproduction Use Target Weight for replacements Cows need to calve in BCS 5 or 6 Heifers should calve in BCS 6 or 7 Cows need to maintain wt. after calving Thin cows that gain weight after calving have improved conception rate Weight-Cycling During the Year Normal fluctuation Excess nutrients = weight and BCS gain Limited nutrients = weight and BCS loss Timing of fluctuation is critical Economical recovery is critical Moderate BCS at calving / breeding Nutrients Required for Pregnancy Last trimester Concept of energy balance vs. BCS per se (Houghton et al., 1990; Lake et al., 2005) E retention and uptake by the uterus (Ferrell et al., 1976; Reynolds et al., 1986) Suggests this is a critical time for nutrients Thin cows gaining weight in last trimester No change in birth weight (Corah et al., 1975; DeRouen et al., 1994; Morrison et al., 1999; Freetley et al., 2000) Managing Energy Reserves Maintenance energy requirements 77 kcal/w.75 Confirmed for mature cows (Buskirk et al., 1992) Confirmed for gestating 1 st calf heifers (Graffam, 1992) Lactating 1 st calf heifers (Ripberger, 1997) 97.2 kcal/w.75 (23% ) for Angus 106.9 kcal/w.75 (38.8% ) for Simmental 8