Assessment of Environmental Liabilities of Historically Reclaimed Sites

Similar documents
2015/16 Orphan Site Reclamation Fund Annual Report

Carbon Capture and Storage Regulatory Policy

Reclamation: Legislative / Regulatory Requirements

2012 Pipeline Performance and Activity Report. BC Oil and Gas Commission

FACTS. Highlights of Legislation and Regulations ON CONTAMINATED SITES

PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA MINISTRY OF ENERGY AND MINES

BC MINES ACT PERMITTING: UPDATE ON GOVERNMENT STRUCTURE, ROLES, RESPONSIBILITIES AND REQUIREMENTS

Multi-Year Area-Based Permitting Policy for Mineral and Coal Exploration Activities

2017/ /20 SERVICE PLAN

2018/ /21 SERVICE PLAN

Recommendations for a Sustainable Funding Mechanism

General Order #4473/76 was specific to oil and gas well sites, gathering and flow lines. The order contained the following statement and resolution:

Evolution of Compliance Oversight of Environmental Assessment Projects in BC

Audits of Two P3 Projects in the Sea-to-Sky Corridor

I N F O R M A T I O N B U L L E T I N

Engineer, Pipelines BC Oil & Gas Commission, Kelowna. Engineering Division - Pipelines

Ministry of Energy and Mines. 2003/04 Annual Service Plan Report

Informational Letter IL 98-2

Water Licence Application Manual

Indian and Northern Affairs Canada. Affaires indiennes et du Nord Canada MINE SITE RECLAMATION POLICY FOR THE NORTHWEST TERRITORIES

Water - policy and government regulation for heavy oil and oilsands development

Ac i Pl Status Report

2013 Restoration Verification Audit Program Procedure Manual

Pipeline Performance Summary Annual Report

T F Airport Road Fort St John BC V1J 4M6

Canada-British Columbia BUILDING CANADA FUND - Communities Component

TRANSBOUNDARY WATERS. Friends & Neighbors: Background on the Bilateral Working Group FALL Members of the Bilateral Working Group Alaska

Mitigating a legacy of liability for Alberta: A novel approach to the orphaned well challenge

March Protected area boundary adjustments fall within one of three categories:

Appendix 1: Forest Carbon Emission Offset Project Development Guidance

Ministry of Community, Sport and Cultural Development Executive Lead Arts, Culture and Sport Division Victoria, BC

KEY GOVERNING LEGISLATION, STANDARDS AND CODES

OFFICERS OF THE LEGISLATURE

2017/ /20 SERVICE PLAN

Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

A Proposed Framework for a Waste-Free Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change Technical Briefing

DRINKING WATER PROTECTION PLAN

Strategic Relations Specialist

Applications and Operations Operational Policy and Environment External Audit

Taxpayer Accountability Principles: Strengthening Public Sector Governance and Accountability June 2014

THE ENERGY DEVELOPMENT CYCLE

Invasive Alien Plant Program. Part I. Module 1.8. Prepared by Range Branch. Ministry of Forests and Range

Environmental Regulation & Mine Permitting in Ontario

Proposed regulation change under the Oil, Gas and Salt Resources Act

Alberta Energy Regulator Mandate and Roles Document

Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Regulation in British Columbia. McCarthy Tétrault LLP mccarthy.ca

Notice of Public Tender

Renewal of Conservation Permit CP Pipeline Road

Management of Contaminated Sites

Environmental Assessment, Reclamation and Exploration

KITSAULT MINE PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT. Section Compliance Reporting

A Proposed Framework for a Waste-Free Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change

A Summary of the Government of British Columbia s Crown Agency Accountability System

Cliff # Attachment 1

Allowable Annual Cut Partitioning Guide

MONTHLY UPDATE PRIMROSE OIL SANDS FLOW TO SURFACE

Shareholder s Expectations For British Columbia Crown Agencies

Indian Oil and Gas Canada

Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Regulation in British Columbia

J.H. Wiens. Contaminated Sites Unit Environmental Protection Division, BC Environment 777 Broughton St., Victoria, B.C.

MONTHLY UPDATE PRIMROSE OIL SANDS FLOW TO SURFACE

2017/ /20 SERVICE PLAN

International Overview of the Practices on Contaminated Sites in Canada Session A

Applications & Operations Compliance Operations. Qualifications

Please see attached. From: fred marshall

Appendix 8. Petroleum Hydrocarbon Products, Ammonium Nitrate and Explosives Management Plan

DRINKING WATER OFFICERS GUIDE INTRODUCTION

STRATEGIC PLAN

British Columbia United States Comparator: Standard-Making and Enforcement Functions

Vancouver Airport Fuel Delivery Project Environmental Assessment Certificate Decision Frequently Asked Questions

Vancouver Airport Fuel Delivery Project Environmental Assessment Certificate Decision Frequently Asked Questions

British Columbia s. VVater Act. Modernization. Policy Proposal on British Columbia s new Water Sustainability Act. December 2010

Environmental Assessment Office SERVICE PLAN 2004/ /07

MINING AND UPSTREAM PETROLEUM PRODUCTION. CONTAMINATED SITES ASSESSMENT AND REMEDIATION THE REGULATORY REGIMES AND THE POTENTIAL FOR LIABILITY

Atlantic PIRI Key Regulatory Developments

Remediation Certificate Application for Upstream Oil and Gas Sites

BRIEFING NOTE. Support for the project charter is requested from the Assistant Deputy Minister for Environmental Policy.

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN NUCLEAR WASTE MANAGEMENT IN CANADA

Incident Reporting Requirements

Reasons for Ministers Decision

FACT SHEET. Ministry of Forests, Lands, Natural Resource Operations and Rural Development. Managing Dugouts in Northeast B.C.

Geophysical Guidelines for the Muskwa-Kechika Management Area

Flaring, Incinerating and Venting Reduction Report for 2010

Glossary of Treaty-Related Terms As Used by the Province of British Columbia

Ministry of Energy and Mines SERVICE PLAN 2003/ /06

Strengthening Management of Contaminated Sites in Canada: A Federal Perspective

Investing in Alberta s Clean Energy Future A Framework. The Plan

Environmental Code Including the Role of Agrologists Saskatchewan Institute of Agrologists

NUCLEAR WASTE MANAGEMENT AND DECOMMISSIONING BACKGROUND INFORMATION

YANKEE GIRL TAILINGS REMEDIATION PROJECT YMIR BC. NOAMI Case Study Presentation Part 1 Friday, November 14

Canadian Mining Law and the Impacts on Indigenous Peoples Lands and Resources Federal Structure:

Ministry of the Economy. Plan for saskatchewan.ca

FILE: EFFECTIVE DATE: June 1, 2011 AMENDMENT:

Municipal Boundary Extension Process Guide

Protocol Agreement. Ministry of Sustainable Resource Management and the Oil and Gas Commission

Source Water Protection in BC: Challenges and Opportunities

INTEGRITY DIGS AND STORAGE CAVERNS

2018 SA ELECTION ENVIRONMENTAL LAW REFORM PRIORITIES PAPER

OGC 3: Bachelor s degree in Hydrology, Hydrogeology, Physical Geography, Earth Science, Engineering,

Facilitating Implementation of the Canada-Ontario Agreement on Environmental Assessment Cooperation

Transcription:

Assessment of Environmental Liabilities of Historically Reclaimed Sites

About the BC Oil and Gas Commission The BC Oil and Gas Commission is an independent, single-window regulatory agency with responsibilities for overseeing oil and gas operations in British Columbia, including exploration, development, pipeline transportation and reclamation. The Commission s core roles include reviewing and assessing applications for industry activity, consulting with First Nations, ensuring industry complies with provincial legislation and cooperating with partner agencies. The public interest is protected through the objectives of ensuring public safety, protecting the environment, conserving petroleum resources and ensuring equitable participation in production.

TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary...Page 2 Background...Page 3 Analysis...Page 4 Moving Forward... Page 6

Executive SUMMARY A February 2010 report by British Columbia s Auditor General, entitled Oil and Gas Site Contamination Risks Improved Oversight Needed, recommended that the BC Oil and Gas Commission (Commission) assess the risks associated with legacy sites and develop a suitable workplan to deal with the risks. The purpose of this report is to provide a summary of what constitutes a legacy site and provide additional information on the potential risks posed by these sites. There are 3,721 legacy sites in British Columbia. Legacy sites are wellsites that were decommissioned and remediated prior to the establishment of the Crown Land Restoration Branch (CLRB) in 2004, which is now under the Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations. These wellsites were decommissioned and reclaimed in accordance with the prevailing standards at the time of well closure and as such there is no reason to believe that there are any unaccounted for liabilities associated with these wells. The Commission has undertaken research which shows that existing operators active in oil and gas developments in British Columbia or other Canadian provinces are linked to all but 54 of these wellsites, showing there remain viable operators with significant assets who are responsible for any further remedial costs that may arise from these well sites. There is minimal environmental liability associated with the 54 wellsites for which no operator can be identified as only two were ever placed into active operation (one gas well on private land and one oil well on Crown land). Legacy Sites Orphan Sites Certificate of Restoration (CoR) All sites that received a Certificate of Restoration (CoR), or were exempt from the requirement, prior to October 2004. Oil and gas sites that may require remedial work but no viable operator can be identified. The Orphan Site Reclamamtion Fund was created for such instances. These sites are designated by the Commissioner. This certificate ensures that a site used for oil and gas development was restored to a safe and productive state. The Commission is responsible for overseeing the restoration activity ensuring all applications approved are in the public interest with regard to environmental, economic and social effects. ability to designate any Crown legacy sites as orphans and access the Orphan Site Restoration Fund to manage them if necessary. Any issues arising from residual contamination associated with wells on private land are also managed by the Commission under the Orphan Site Restoration Fund. In addition to the 54 wellsites mentioned above, there are wells that were drilled and abandoned prior to any formal regulation and are not included in the Commission s records. To date, approximately 16 potential locations have been identified in southeast British Columbia that were drilled by early prospectors between 1900 and 1930, and many of these were drilled at the location of natural oil seeps. Provisions within the Oil and Gas Activities Act provide the 2

BACKGROUND All wellsites, test holes and production facilities within British Columbia must be properly deactivated and the land restored before a surface lease is removed. In 1974 amendments were introduced to the Petroleum and Natural Gas Act to provide for the issuance of a CoR. From 1974 to 1998, CoRs were issued by the Ministry of Energy and Mines (MEM) to permit holders that had completed site restoration and had applied for a CoR. Prior to 1974, CoRs were not issued and sites were restored in accordance with the standards of the day under the administration of MEM. Some sites that were restored prior to the 1974 legislated requirement for CoRs were subsequently issued a CoR by MEM. Since the formation of the Commission in 1998, CoRs have been issued by the Commission. A total of 3,721 sites within British Columbia are considered to be legacy sites. Table 1 provides a summary of the types of these sites. Table 1 Summary of Legacy Sites Site Type Total Never Produced 3,507 Gas Production 119 Oil Production 64 Well Sites Mixed Oil and Gas 6 Production Water Source Wells 11 Water Disposal Wells 5 Test Holes Drilled 9 Total 3,721 3

Analysis Test holes are shallow holes under 600 metres in depth that were typically drilled to obtain stratigraphic information about the geological conditions at the site. In rare circumstances, limited evaluation of a reservoir might occur. As the test holes are shallow and do not involve the commercial production of petroleum or natural gas, there is minimal risk of contamination associated with these sites. Given that legacy sites were restored to a productive state in accordance with the standards administered by MEM, combined with the typical geology of northeast British Columbia and standard practices for the disposal of waste associated with drilling, the Commission believes there is minimal probability that these sites pose a significant risk to human health or the environment. It is expected the vast majority of these sites would not require any further remedial work if provincial risk assessment protocols and procedures were applied. However, the Commission is mindful standards change over time and additional information may be received regarding these legacy sites indicating additional remedial work is required. Under Section 45 of the Environmental Management Act (EMA), current and past owners and operators of contaminated sites and persons whose activities resulted in site contamination are responsible for the remediation of that contamination. This responsibility is not time sensitive and per Section 47(1) of the EMA the responsible parties are absolutely, retroactively and jointly and separately liable for incurred costs of the remediation whether on or off-site. The bulk of legacy sites (3,341 sites) can be linked via Section 45 of the EMA to companies who have current active production operations within British Columbia. These are companies that have a favourable Liability Management Rating (LMR), meaning the Commission believes they have sufficient assets to provide for any additional site remedial work if required. An additional 326 legacy sites can be linked to one or Mulching on a restored activity site. 4

more companies who have operations in British Columbia or other jurisdictions. The Commission believes the companies responsible for these sites do have the resources to perform additional remediation work at legacy sites if required, but notes the LMR for these companies indicates a moderate risk of financial default. The balance of legacy sites includes 54 wellsites for which no current operating company can be identified. A breakdown of these 54 wells by type is provided below in Table 2. The responsibility for remediation of any legacy sites on Crown land lies with the CLRB. However, for practical purposes the Commission remains actively involved in the assessment and remediation of these sites as funding for any future restoration work will potentially come from the Orphan Sites Reclamation Fund rather than from public funds. Should additional restoration be required, the Commission will make all reasonable attempts to identify a responsible party and to recover funds through available legislative and legal means. In addition to the known legacy sites there are a limited number of sites which predate the provincial records. There is evidence approximately 16 wells that are not accounted for in Commission records may have been drilled in southeast British Columbia between 1900 and 1930. These wells typically targeted natural oil seeps near Sage Creek and Akamina Creek, and one well is known to have produced small quantities of light crude oil and saline water. Table 2 Legacy Sites Not Linked to Current Operating Companies Wellsites Site Type # on Private Land # on Crown Land Total Number Never Produced 19 33 52 Producing Gas Site 1 0 1 Producing Oil Site 0 1 1 5

moving forward This report was created to address the British Columbia Auditor General s report Oil and Gas Contamination Sites Improved Oversight Needed, as well as detail Commission s ongoing efforts in identifying and restoring legacy sites. Of the approximately 3,721 legacy sites, all but 54 referred to as orphan sites can be linked to active companies that own or operate wells or production facilities in British Columbia or other jurisdictions. The Commission continues to work toward restoring these sites through such means as the Orphan Site Restoration Fund. A key priority of the Commission, as detailed in our mandate and expressed in our mission statement, is conservation of the environment. Moving forward, the Commission will continue transparency in the oversight of legacy sites and continue to ensure the balance between environmental concerns and resource development for the benefit of all British Columbians. We welcome your comments on this report as well as suggestions to improve future reporting. For more information contact: Devin Scheck Director, Waste Management & Reclamation 250-794-5232 Devin.Scheck@bcogc.ca 6