NEMC Challenges of Managing Water in the Marcellus Play. Nick Inkenhaus Water Resources Engineer

Similar documents
Shale Gas (D: unkonventionelles Erdgas )

WATER AND SHALE GAS DEVELOPMENT

Drilling for Natural Gas in the Marcellus and Utica Shales: Environmental Regulatory Basics

Chapter 9. Water Sourcing and Wastewater Disposal for Marcellus Shale Development in Pennsylvania

Water Management Optimization

Water Issues Relating to Unconventional Oil and Gas Production

Natural Gas Well Development in the Marcellus Shale: The Use of Fresh Water and Beyond

Evaluation of Abandoned Mine Drainage as a water supply for hydraulic fracturing

3 rd Shale Play Water Management Marcellus and Utica COLLABORATION CASE STUDY

Crystallization A Viable and Green Solution to Industry s Wastewater Needs

Crystallization A Viable and Green Solution to Industry s Wastewater Needs

WATER RESOURCES ISSUES RELATED TO SHALE GAS DEVELOPMENT

George E. King SPE GCS 27 October 2011

THE MARCELLUS SHALE AN ENERGY GAME

New England Council Shale Gas Development. October 7, 2011 David J. Spigelmyer---VP, Government Relations Chesapeake Energy

CHALLENGES AND ADVANCEMENTS IN PRODUCED WATER REUSE AND RECYCLING

J. Daniel Arthur, P.E., ALL Consulting. Author. Ground Water Protection Council January 2009 San Antonio, Texas. Presented at

Water Availability and Management in Shale Gas Operations

Lifecycle Water Management Considerations & Challenges for Marcellus Shale Gas Development

WATER USED FOR HYDRAULIC FRACTURING: AMOUNTS, SOURCES, REUSE,

Water/Energy Sustainability Symposium 2010 Annual Forum Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania September 26-29, 2010

RECYCLING PRODUCED & FLOWBACK WASTEWATER FOR FRACKING TECHNOLOGY. Clarifying misconceptions on the obstacles for frac water reuse

The Use of Electro-Coagulation Technology to Treat Hydrofracturing Flowback Water and Other Oil and Gas Field Wastewaters

Environmental and Economic Considerations for Marcellus Natural Gas Development. Presented by Tom Murphy and Dave Yoxtheimer

Where in New York are the Marcellus and Utica Shales??

GWPC Shale Gas and Water Use Presentation September 28, 2010

Approaches with Recycle, Treatment, and Disposal of Flowback and Produced Water and the ABCs of Managing NORM in the Marcellus Shale Region

Changes in the Quantity and Quality of Produced Water from Appalachian Shale Energy Development and their Implications for Water Reuse

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR RE-USE OF PRODUCED WATER. Presented by: Richard Bost, P.E., P.G. (Texas) I2M Associates

Water / Fluid Treatment Technologies and the Art of Applying Technology to Address Reuse and Recycling Challenges in the Oil and Gas Field

David Blackmon Managing Director for Public Policy and Strategic Communications FTI Consulting

Natural Gas Reform Campaign

The role of water management in unlocking unconventional resources

Where in New York are the Marcellus and Utica Shales??

Characterization of Marcellus Shale and Barnett Shale Flowback Waters and Technology Development for Water Reuse

New York State Regulatory/Permitting Process and Practical Considerations for Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTWs) to Treat Flowback Water

Bryan Swistock Water Resources Extension Specialist Penn State University

Opportunities and Freight Transportation Needs from Marcellus and Utica in Ohio

EXPERIENCES IN SHALE WASTE WATER MANAGEMENT An Update on the Issues Associated with Water in the United States Shale Gas Sector

The Opportunities, Challenges, and Unknowns of Shale Gas Exploration

Annex A ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PART I. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROTECTION OF NATURAL RESOURCES ARTICLE II.

Aquatech Energy Services

Impoundments for Cost-Effective Recycling of Produced Water for Hydraulic Fracturing

Regulatory, Policy and Transportation Challenges to Gas Delivery:

We weren t planning to talk about it, but since you asked... CEE With special thanks to Dr. Brian Rahm of the NY State Water Resources Institute

Water Resource Management for Shale Energy Development

Table of Contents See also Summary of Contents on the previous page.

Incorporating Sustainability Practices to Reduce Water in Upstream Oil and Gas Development

Utilizing Unconventional Water Sources for Industrial Reuse

Rethinking Water Treatment in Shales Less is More

Compatibility of Scale Inhibitors and Biocides with Fracturing Fluids. Christy C. Wentworth, Ph.D.

Fracture Stimulation Just the Facts, Ma am

ESC Technology and Market Assessment Forum

The Application of Produced Water Treatment and Water Blending in Shale Resource Development

Novel Treatment Technologies for Desalination and Selective Ion Removal

TENORM and Shale Oil & Gas Considerations for State Programs

Core Value. Unconventional Gas Production and Water Resources: Lessons from the U.S. Brisbane, Sydney & Canberra, Australia February 27 March 1, 2012

Gastem USA. Environmental Concerns, Mitigating Actions & Best Practices Otsego County, NY.

Cumulative Risks of Shale Gas Development

BENEFICIAL USE OF PRODUCED WATER SOUNDS SIMPLE ENOUGH. Rick McCurdy, Ground Water Protection Council s Annual UIC Conference February 21-23, 2017

Chemical precipitation out performs filtration in flowback and produced water recycling operations.

Hydrofracing 101 (Part 2)

Environmental Protection and Marcellus Shale Well Development. Scott Perry Director Bureau of Oil and Gas Management

Effective Water Management Strategies For Sustainable Growth. Karthik Viswanathan 8/22/14

PREPARED BY KEN PANDYA AWTS, INC TRIPLE CROWN LN PLANO, TX OFFICE: APRIL 11, 2012

Shale Gas Water Water Management Consortiums: Marcellus and Barnett Regions

The Oklahoma Water Conundrum. D. Steven Tipton, PE September 28-30, 2015 Ground Water Protection Council Annual Forum Oklahoma City, OK

Collection and Treatment of Flowback and Produced Waters from Hydraulic Fracturing. Edwin Pinero Veolia Water North America

Statistics valid as of January 2004.

Hydrofracing 101 (Part 2)

Hydraulic Fracturing of Shales: Water Contamination Risks, Wastewater Management Strategies, and Emerging Research Challenges

Evaluation of Potential Impacts of Hydraulic Fracturing Flowback Fluid Additives on Microbial Processes in Publicly-Owned Treatment Works (Po-rvvs)

The Oklahoma Water Conundrum

Paradox Valley Unit Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Project

Implications for Disposal of Oil and Gas Flowback Fluids from Brine Treatment Plants

Simple, Environmentally Friendly, and Economical Methods to Maximize the Reuse of Produced Water for Frac Operations

Shale Gas Wastes: Ohio Public Policy & Potential Impacts to Water Supplies

Considerations for hydraulic fracturing and groundwater and surface water protection: lessons learned in the U.S.

Chemical Precipitation and Ballasted Flocculation

SHALE DRILLING. Linda Nicholson and Colleagues November 11, 2009

Addressing increasing wastewater volumes in industrial and oil & gas operations using thermal systems

Water Technologies & Solutions Water Technologies & Solutions. water treatment solutions for unconventional fuels

CONSIDERATIONS FOR USE OF PRODUCED WATER AT COAL-FIRED POWER PLANTS

Arthur W. Rose Professor Emeritus of Geochemistry Penn State University

Techno-economic Assessment of Water Management Solutions

Facts of Myths of the Marcellus Shale: A Scientific Perspective

Detail on Concentrate Handling and Disposal Options

DRBC Natural Gas Regulations. UDC Committee Briefing February 10, 2011

Energy-Water Science & Technology Research Roadmap. John Gasper Argonne National Laboratory and Energy Water Nexus Team

Viscosifying FR Fluids Mark Van Domelen

Jill Cooper, HSE Manager Reporting & Advocacy

Lee Shafer Basin Engineering October 26, 2017

Treatment for Blended Produced and Fresh/Brackish Water

Water Management Barnett Shale November 21, 2008

Risks of Shale Gas Exploration and Hydraulic Fracturing to Water Resources in the United States

Water Management for Hydraulic Fracturing in Unconventional Resources Part 1

9. It has been documented that toxic chemicals have been injected via the fracing process in the states of Alabama, Colorado, New Mexico, Ohio,

SPE SPE PP. Woodford Completion Operations

Energy & Water. Roland L. Moreau ExxonMobil Upstream Research Company NSF Energy-Water Nexus Workshop June 10-11, 2013 Alexandria, VA

Transcription:

NEMC Challenges of Managing Water in the Marcellus Play August 5, 2013 December 22, 2011 Nick Inkenhaus Water Resources Engineer

Water Requirements for Marcellus Shale Completion typically requires 3-5 million gallons of water Pump rates range from 70 100 bpm Is that a lot of water? 5 million gallons is 1.8 inches of water over an area of 100 acres, the approximate drainage area of a well PA receives about 40 inches of rainfall per year If the productive area of the Marcellus takes 50 years to drill, annual water use over the productive area would be 0.04 inches of water per year or 1/10 th of 1% of annual rainfall 2

Water Requirements for Marcellus Shale Water use per million btu of energy: Deep shale natural gas Marcellus Shale gas avg Nuclear (uranium ready to use in a power plant) Conventional oil Synfuel-coal gasification Coal (delivered power plant) Oil shale Tar sands/oil sands Fuel ethanol from corn Biodiesel from soy 0.60-5.80 gallons 1 gallon 8-14 gallons 8-20 gallons 11-26 gallons 13-32 gallons 22-56 gallons 27-68 gallons 2,510-29,100 gallons (irrigation) 14,000-75,000 gallons (irrigation) Shale gas production uses less water than any other significant energy source Source: U.S. Dept. of Energy 3

Water Usage Comparison Source: USGS, Pennsylvania Water Consumption 4

Source Requirements Reliability/Seasonality Quality/Compatibility Location/Proximity 5

Sources - Municipal 6

Sources Surface Water 7

Sources Surface Water 8

Water supply sources Larger streams, rivers, and reservoirs PA DEP has adopted SRBC method for analyzing water withdrawal and must approve all water management plans Water can be safely withdrawn at reasonable rates all year with exceptions for very dry periods Protection of downstream uses Cumulative impact considerations Reuse is now a significant water source 29.5% of Range s total PA water usage in 2011 was from reuse 29% of Range s total PA water usage in 2012 was from reuse 9

Acid Mine Drainage Sources Alternative Parameter Min Max Average Units Flow 80 45,553 1,638 gpm ph 2.8 8.6 5 TSS 2 656 29 ppm TDS 144 3,486 1,120 ppm Chlorides 1 348 31 ppm Sulfate 5 2,800 416 ppm Hardness 74 1,559 435 ppm Iron (total) 0 238 19 ppm Magnesium (total) 2 525 47 ppm PA DEP Orphaned Mine Discharge Project 10

Sources Alternative Municipal Parameter Value Units ph 5.0-9.0 TSS 30 ppm 5-Day BOD 30 mg/l EPA Secondary Treatment Standard 11

Water Transfer 12

Water Transfer Minimize Trucking Source water, 800-900 trucks per well Flowback, ~180 trucks per well Proximity is key Pumping and Pipelines Temporary Integrity Distance Permanent network Link large sources to storage locations Noise Mitigation 13

Water Transfer 3 rd Party Engineer Develops Test Pipe rating Component ratings Layout Weather conditions Separate Testing Firm Executes Approximately 8 hours Any failure results in re-test Scheduled 3-7 days prior to frac Procedure/test for each job 14

Treatment, Reuse, and Disposal 10-30% of water flows back to surface near-term after completions activities; balance is bound in micro fractures in shale Water flowed back after frac contains salts and other naturally occurring dissolved minerals present in ancient sea water Water is gathered and removed from site by either truck or pipeline Management methods during 2011/2012: Recycle Injection wells Advanced treatment facilities 15

Recycling - Challenging Convention Simplified Fluid Design Slickwater with scale inhibitor and biocide Water Quality Shale permeability Production mechanism Water mobility Challenge conventional rules of thumb Parameter Conventional Limits Considerations ph 6.0 to 8.0 Fluid Stability, Scaling Chlorides <20,000 mg/l Fluid Stability Iron <20 mg/l Fluid Stability Ca, Mg, Ba, SO 4, CO 3, ƒ(p,t,ph) (+/- 350 mg/l) Scaling Bacteria Count <100/100 mg/l Bacteria Growth nanodarcy, nd, 1 x 10-9 D Suspended Solids <50 mg/l Skin Oil & Soluble Organics <25 mg/l Fluid Stability millidarcy, md, 1 x 10-3 D 16

Timeline Recycling - Challenging Convention Fall 2008 Range formed Water Resources Group April 2009 Started accumulating recycle water August 2009 Competed first recycled water frac 17

Range s Water Recycling Program Rapidly Evolving Technology Recycling technology did not develop in other shale gas plays due to abundant opportunities for disposal by injection into deep rock formations Recycling in the Marcellus play has been driven by lack of other disposal options and regulatory framework Technology will continue to improve rapidly Completions designs Chloride tolerant friction reducers 18

Industry Recycling Progression in PA PA DEP Oil & Gas Reporting Website Data 19

Range s Water Recycling Program Throughout the first half of 2013: Southern Marcellus Operations Flowback Recycle 100% Production Brine Recycle 100% Drilling Fluids Recycle 88.3% Overall Recycle Rate 98.1% 20

Thank You Nick Inkenhaus Water Resources Engineer Range Resources Appalachia, LLC Southern Marcellus Shale Division 724-743-6700 Additional Information: www.rangeresources.com www.marcelluscoallition.org 21