September 9, Corzo Castella Carballo Thompson Salman, P.A. 901 Ponce de Leon Boulevard Suite 900 Coral Gables, Florida 33134

Similar documents
This report presents the findings of the subsurface exploration concerning the design of the taxiway rehabilitation. Description

May 1, THE CORRADINO GROUP 4055 N.W. 97 th Avenue Miami, Florida Mr. Carlos E. Verson, P.E. Project Manager

August 15, 2006 (Revised) July 3, 2006 Project No A

CONDUCTED FOR: PREPARED FOR: 18 October 2010 YPC Project No. 10GY133

Typical Subsurface Profile. November 28, 2016

REPORT OF GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION WEST MARJORY AVENUE TAMPA, FLORIDA

Subsurface Environmental Investigation

1.0 PROJECT INFORMATION. 1.1 Site Location and Description. October 31, 2017

Ardaman & Associates, Inc. Geotechnical, Environmental and Materials Consultants

Ardaman & Associates, Inc. Geotechnical, Environmental and Materials Consultants

April 7, Webster Street Sub-Surface Stormwater Storage System Bid No Bid Date: 4/13/17 ADDENDUM NO 1

PROJECT INFORMATION. 1.1 Site Location. October 4, Jerry Schwab/President 315 Aden Ave., Suite 26 Glendale, CA 91203

Re: Geotechnical Consultation for Storm Infiltration Robert Louis Stevenson ES Modernization th Avenue San Francisco, California

Report of Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Investigation for Ponds

June 28, Test Well Flow Rate Report MSD Underground Injection Control Wells City of Richlawn Louisville, Kentucky 40207

PROPOSED CONDOS 1129 Victoria Drive, Dunedin Parcel: , Pinellas County Geotechnical Services June Report No.

CONDUCTED FOR: PREPARED FOR: 5 May 2016 YPC Project No. 16GY146

mtec REPORT OF GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION FTFA Construct Bin Wall at HERD Eglin AFB, Florida

Applied GeoScience, Inc Hammond Dr., Suite 6 Schaumburg, Illinois

Subsurface Study. Faulk Assisted Living Facility Boca Raton, Florida. George E. Mueller West Palm Beach, Florida

Sepetember 27, Florida Department of Environmental Protection Attn: Dawn Templin 160 Governmental Center Pensacola, FL

Estimating the Seasonal High Water Table: A Mix of Art & Science

For. Report of Geotechnical Exploration. University of North Florida Parking Lot 47 Jacksonville, Florida

REPORT OF GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION AND ENGINEERING ANALYSIS

SUMMARY REPORT OF A GEOTECHNICAL SITE EXPLORATION LACROSSE CITRUS REPOSITORY LACROSSE, ALACHUA COUNTY, FLORIDA. GSE PROJECT No.

Subsurface Investigation Report. Proposed New 1-Story Building 6447 Grand Avenue Gurnee, Illinois

For. Report of Geotechnical Exploration. University of North Florida Parking Lot 11 Jacksonville, Florida

ABSTRACT & POWERPOINT PRESENTATION

Applied GeoScience, Inc Hammond Dr., Suite 6 Schaumburg, Illinois

Report of Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Investigation for Ponds

VOCs, including fuel oxygenates, via EPA Analytical Method The second soil sample from MW-24 (MW ) was analyzed for Total Organic Carbon.

Keys Edge Community Development District. Engineer s Report Infrastructure Improvements

Addendum # 1 Public Safety Complex Wetland Date of Addendum: 2/23/17

REPORT OF GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION PEPSI PLACE WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA E&A PROJECT NO CLIENT ID: 4784

PROJECT NO A. ISSUED: February 29, 2016

South Sound Geotechnical Consulting P.O. Box Lakewood, WA (253) Figure 1 Site Plan. SERA Playground Tacoma, WA.

3. FIELD INVESTIGATION PROGRAM

Report of Exploratory Test Pits

This Page Intentionally Left Blank


November 9, Tredyffrin Township Stephen Burgo, PE Township Engineer 1100 Duportail Road Berwyn, PA

Geotechnical Exploration and Evaluation Report

May 2, Mr. Tim Kurmaskie, AIA ARCHITECT KURMASKIE ASSOCIATES, INC Washington Street Raleigh, NC

November 13, IP3406. Mr. Uriah Sowell Rooney Engineering 115 Inverness Drive East, Suite 300, Englewood, CO 80112

HSA ENGINEERS & SCIENTISTS. A member of the CRA family of companies

PAVEMENT DESIGN SUMMARY TANGERINE ROAD CORRIDOR PROJECT INTERSTATE 10 TO LA CANADA DRIVE PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA

Geotechnical Engineering Report

GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION PROPOSED OUTFALL LOCATION CITY OF MORGAN S POINT DRAINAGE HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS REPORT NO

ADDENDUM NO. 1. PROJECT NAME: Bostic Pelt Road NRCS Drainage Improvements PRI PROJECT NO: Wakulla Co ITB#

Preliminary Soil Survey Report

GEOTECHNICAL STUDY PROPOSED CONCRETE ROADWAY TIKI ISLAND COMMUNITY GALVESTON COUNTY, TEXAS PROJECT NO E

Attachment B: Field Forms and Notes

Geotechnical Exploration and Evaluation Report

LICENSED ENGINEERING, ASBESTOS & GEOLOGICAL BUSINESS

Report of Geotechnical Exploration For Baymeadows Road/Old Still PUD 6 inch Reclaimed Water Main Jacksonville, FL

Results of Onsite Percolation Testing Ellis Commons Senior Housing Development APN City of Perris, California

For. Report of Geotechnical Exploration. St. Johns Parkway Race Track Road to Espada Lane 8-inch Reclaimed Water Main St.

November 13, IP3406. Mr. Uriah Sowell Rooney Engineering 115 Inverness Drive East, Suite 300, Englewood, CO 80112

July 23, Mr. Richard Miller, Vice President Lake Arrowhead Property Owners Association 7065 Arrowroot Trail Gaylord, Michigan 49735

EXHIBIT G GEOTECHNICAL REPORT (DRAFT)

Report of Geotechnical Exploration For. University of North Florida Kernan Shuttle Stop Jacksonville, Florida

Cherry Estates APPENDIX A

October 11, 2011 Re-Issued November 15, 2011

ENGINEERING SERVICES REPORT FOREST LAKES BOULEVARD PAVEMENT EVALUATION TAMPA ROAD TO COUNTY LINE FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FL. May 21, 2010 URS CORPORATION

Water Management Under Severe Storm Conditions in Central and South Florida

REPORT OF GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTING SERVICES

SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT. Question 13: Wetlands

Subsurface Investigation Report

GEOTEK ENGINEERING & TESTING SERVICES, INC. 909 East 50 th Street North Sioux Falls, South Dakota Phone Fax

September 3, 2013 Via

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION: MATERIALS REPORT COVER SHEET. Soil Survey Report March 29, 2015 Matthew G. Moore, P.E.

Report of CCR Rule Stability Analyses AEP Clifty Creek Power Plant Boiler Slag Pond Dam and Landfill Runoff Collection Pond

Earth Mechanics, Inc. Geotechnical & Earthquake Engineering

REPORT OF GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION BYFORGE ENGINEERING FOR REFERENCE ONLY

Geotechnical Investigation Report

LAKE LABELLE ENGINEERING REPORT

ORLANDO SANFORD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT OUTPARCEL 1 SANFORD, FLORIDA

paterson -MEMO consulting engineers

Stormwater Standards. Clackamas County Service District No. 1. Infiltration Testing Guide

100% Report of Geotechnical Engineering Investigation CENTRAL FLORIDA COMMUTER RAIL TRANSIT SUNRAIL PHASE 2 SOUTH Poinciana Vehicle Storage & Light

THIS INFORMATION IS PROVIDED BY PLUMAS COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH

ORLANDO SANFORD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT OUTPARCEL 6 SANFORD, FLORIDA

Florida s Leading Engineering Source

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT. 158 Attachment 2. Borough of Perkasie

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT FOR. Chick-Fil-A S Ferdon Blvd, Crestview FL. February 10 th, 2017

Soil Improvement by Compaction Grouting

Bioreactor Landfill Design

Subject: Aquifer Test Observation Well Installation Work Plan Hilmar Cheese Company, Hilmar, Merced County, CA

BROWARD COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DEPARTMENT (EPD) MINIMUM CRITERIA FOR MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION AND SAMPLING

APPENDIX A GEOTECHNICAL REPORT

Determination of Design Infiltration Rates for the Sizing of Infiltration based Green Infrastructure Facilities

FENCE INSTALLATION PERMIT APPLICATION INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS FOR WOOD FENCES AS PER THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE

Report of Geotechnical Exploration PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER AND FORCE MAIN REPLACEMENT

INVESTIGATION RESULTS

SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION & GEOTECHNICAL RECOMMENDATIONS PROPOSED MONOPOLE CELL TOWER INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA A&W PROJECT NO: 15IN0464

Highway 12 SP , Willmar Wye Soils Borings, Soils Tests, and Reporting

March 10, 2017 SITE AND PROJECT INFORMATION

File No Supplemental November Geotechnical and Environmental Consulting Engineers

Applicant s Handbook, Volume II (including Appendices A through F`) is Incorporated by Reference in Rule , F.A.C.

May 3, Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street NE, Room 1A Washington, D.C

Transcription:

September 9, 2009 Corzo Castella Carballo Thompson Salman, P.A. 90 Ponce de Leon Boulevard Suite 900 Coral Gables, Florida 3334 Attn: Mr. Ian John, E.I. Re: Exfiltration Test Results Glenroyal East Phase Roadway and Drainage Improvements NW 7 th Avenue and NW 7 th Street Miami, Miami-Dade County, Florida Terracon Job No. 3409509 Dear Mr. John: As proposed we have completed 9 exfiltration tests for the above referenced project. The following is a brief description of the test procedures and an overview of the results. Also included in the attachments are Exfiltration Sheets containing the test data and an Exfiltration Test Location Diagram showing the approximate location of the tests. Nine exfiltration tests (E- through E-9) were performed at the site in general accordance with the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) procedures for the "Usual Open-Hole Constant Head Condition" Percolation Tests. The test was performed in a 0- inch diameter borehole advanced by means of a PVC casing to a depth of 5 feet below the existing ground surface. A 6-inch diameter perforated PVC pipe was placed in the borehole prior to retrieving the casing. Water was then pumped into the borehole in order to raise the water level in the borehole to near the ground surface. Once the inflow stabilized with the outflow rate, the average pumping rate and the elevation of the water obtained with this stabilized flow rate were recorded. Material encountered at the exfiltration test site was identified in the field from cuttings brought to the surface by the augering process. Upon completion of the drilling and following groundwater stabilization, the distance from the existing ground surface to the water table was recorded. The rate of water flow required to maintain a constant hydraulic head was then recorded. The hydraulic conductivity value was determined from the test results and is presented in the Exfiltration Test Sheets attachment in this memo. The hydraulic conductivity value is reported in units of cubic feet per second per square foot of seepage area per foot of head (cfs/ft 2 -ft head). Terracon Consultants, Inc. 0080 NW 53 rd Street Sunrise, FL 3335 P [954] 74 8282 F [954] 74 8240 terracon.com

Glenroyal East Phase Drainage and Roadway Improvements Terracon Job No. 3409509 September 9, 2009 The soil profile at the exfiltration test locations generally consisted of fill material consisting of sand and limerock to depths of approximately 2 to feet below grade. Sand with limestone fragments was encountered below the fill material to a depth of approximately 3 feet at E-. Miami limestone was encountered below the sand with limestone fragments at E- and extended to the exfiltration test depth of 5 feet below grade. Limestone was typically encountered at the remaining test locations at depths ranging between 2 and 5 feet below grade and extended to the exfiltration test termination depths of 5 feet. The groundwater level was recorded at the exfiltration test locations during the augering process. During the subsurface exploration, groundwater (measured in August) was typically observed at the test locations at depths ranging from 3 to 6 feet below existing grade. Exceptions exist at test locations E-2 and E-3 where groundwater levels were encountered at approximately 0½ feet and 3 feet, respectively. These water level observations provide an approximate indication of the groundwater conditions existing on the site at the time the borings were drilled. Fluctuations in the groundwater table can occur due to seasonal variations, recent rainfall conditions and other site specific conditions. Therefore, at the time of the year different from the time of drilling, there is a possibility of a change in the recorded level. We estimate that during the peak of the wet hydroperiod, with rainfall and recharge at a maximum, groundwater level at the site could be one to five feet higher than those measured in the borings. This possibility should be considered when developing design and construction plans and specifications for the project. Long term monitoring in cased holes or piezometers would be necessary to accurately evaluate the potential range of groundwater conditions at the site. Asphalt core samples were recovered from the roadway at the exfiltration test locations by J&R Precision Drilling, Inc. A total of nine (9) 4-inch diameter cores were taken. Once the cores were extracted, they were transported to our laboratory in Sunrise, Florida. A summary of the test results and asphalt core thicknesses are presented in the following table. More detailed test information can be found in the attachments included with this letter. Test Location Hydraulic Conductivity (cfs/ft 2 ft.head) TABLE : Exfiltration Test Results Asphalt Thickness (in.) Test Location Hydraulic Conductivity (cfs/ft 2 ft.head) Asphalt Thickness (in.) E- 5.5 x 0-6.99 E-4 2.25 x 0-4 2.60 E-2.09 x 0-5 2.22 E-5 8.5 x 0-4 2.70 E-3 4.56 x 0-3.74 E-6 5.63 x 0-5.7

EFILTRATION TEST LOG - E- Client: C3TS Job # 3409509 Site: NW 7th Avenue and NW 7th Street Test # Project: Glenroyal East Phase Roadway and Drainage Improvements Date: 8/9/2009 6.50 Auger Diameter: 0 inches Tube : 5 Ft Increment Gal/Min 0.5 2 0.5 3 0.3 4 0.3 5 0.3 6 0.3 7 0.3 2 -INCH ASPHALT 8 0.3 0.0-9.0 SAND, fine, brown 9 0.3 9.0-3.0 SAND, with limestone fragments, fine, brown 0 0.3 3.0-5.0 LIMESTONE, with sand, light brown Q = Average Stabilized Rate: 0.3 Gal/Min H = to Groundwater Level: 6.5 Ft Ds = Saturated : 8.5 Ft D = of Hole: 5 Ft Hydraulic Conductivity 5.5E-06 cfs/ft 2 ft.head

EFILTRATION TEST LOG - E-2 Client: C3TS Job # 3409509 Site: NW 7th Avenue and NW 7th Street Test # 2 Project: Glenroyal East Phase Roadway and Drainage Improvements Date: 8/9/2009 0.50 Auger Diameter: 0 inches Tube : 5 Ft Increment Gal/Min.0 2.0 3 0.8 4 0.8 5 0.8 6 0.8 7 0.8 2 /4-INCH ASPHALT 8 0.8 0.0-5.0 FILL-SAND, with limerock, fine, brown 9 0.8 5.0-5.0 LIMESTONE, with sand, light brown to gray 0 0.8 Q = Average Stabilized Rate: 0.8 Gal/Min H = to Groundwater Level: 0.5 Ft Ds = Saturated : 4.5 Ft D = of Hole: 5 Ft Hydraulic Conductivity.09E-05 cfs/ft 2 ft.head

EFILTRATION TEST LOG - E-3 Client: C3TS Job # 3409509 Site: NW 7th Avenue and NW 7th Street Test # 3 Project: Glenroyal East Phase Roadway and Drainage Improvements Date: 8/20/2009 3.00 Auger Diameter: 0 inches Tube : 5 Ft Increment Gal/Min 35.0 2 35.0 3 35.0 4 35.0 5 35.0 6 35.0 7 35.0 3/4-INCH ASPHALT 8 35.0 0-0.0 FILL-LIMEROCK, with sand, light brown 9 35.0 0.0-5.0 LIMESTONE, with sand, tan 0 35.0 Q = Average Stabilized Rate: 35.0 Gal/Min H = to Groundwater Level: 3 Ft Ds = Saturated : 2 Ft D = of Hole: 5 Ft Hydraulic Conductivity 4.56E-03 cfs/ft 2 ft.head Values adjusted since groundwater was not able to be raised to the surface.

EFILTRATION TEST LOG - E-4 Client: C3TS Job # 3409509 Site: NW 7th Avenue and NW 7th Street Test # 4 Project: Glenroyal East Phase Roadway and Drainage Improvements Date: 8/2/2009 4.33 Auger Diameter: 0 inches Tube : 5 Ft Increment Gal/Min 2.0 2.0 3 0.0 4 8.0 5 8.0 6 8.0 7 8.0 2 /2-INCH ASPHALT 8 8.0 0.0-3.0 FILL-LIMEROCK, with sand, fine, light brown 9 8.0 3.0-5.0 LIMESTONE, with sand, brown 0 8.0 Q = Average Stabilized Rate: 8.9 Gal/Min H = to Groundwater Level: 4.33 Ft Ds = Saturated : 0.7 Ft D = of Hole: 5 Ft Hydraulic Conductivity 2.25E-04 cfs/ft 2 ft.head

EFILTRATION TEST LOG - E-5 Client: C3TS Job # 3409509 Site: NW 7th Avenue and NW 7th Street Test # 5 Project: Glenroyal East Phase Roadway and Drainage Improvements Date: 8/20/2009 3.50 Auger Diameter: 0 inches Tube : 5 Ft Sample Location: Increment Gal/Min 30.0 2 28.0 As shown on Exfiltration Test Location Diagram 3 27.0 4 28.0 5 28.0 6 28.0 7 28.0 2 3/4-INCH ASPHALT 8 28.0 0-2.0 SAND, trace limerock, fine, brown 9 28.0 2.0-5.0 LIMESTONE, with sand, light gray to brown 0 28.0 Q = Average Stabilized Rate: 28. Gal/Min H = to Groundwater Level: 3.5 Ft Ds = Saturated :.5 Ft D = of Hole: 5 Ft Hydraulic Conductivity 8.5E-04 cfs/ft 2 ft.head

EFILTRATION TEST LOG - E-6 Client: C3TS Job # 3409509 Site: NW 7th Avenue and NW 7th Street Test # 6 Project: Glenroyal East Phase Roadway and Drainage Improvements Date: 8/20/2009 5.50 Auger Diameter: 0 inches Tube : 5 Ft Increment Gal/Min 3.5 2 3.5 3 2.5 4 2.5 5 2.5 6 2.5 7 2.5 3/4-INCH ASPHALT 8 2.5 0-3.0 FILL-SAND, with limerock, fine, light brown 9 2.5 3.0-5.0 LIMESTONE, with sand, light gray to brown 0 2.5 Q = Average Stabilized Rate: 2.7 Gal/Min H = to Groundwater Level: 5.5 Ft Ds = Saturated : 9.5 Ft D = of Hole: 5 Ft Hydraulic Conductivity 5.63E-05 cfs/ft 2 ft.head

EFILTRATION TEST LOG - E-7 Client: C3TS Job # 3409509 Site: NW 7th Avenue and NW 7th Street Test # 7 Project: Glenroyal East Phase Roadway and Drainage Improvements Date: 8/2/2009 4.00 Auger Diameter: 0 inches Tube : 5 Ft Sample Location: Increment Gal/Min 0.0 2 9.0 As shown on Exfiltration Test Location Diagram 3 9.0 4 9.0 5 9.0 6 9.0 7 9.0 4 3/4-INCH ASPHALT 8 9.0 0 -.0 FILL-SAND, with limerock, fine, brown 9 9.0.0-5.0 LIMESTONE, with sand, tan 0 9.0 Q = Average Stabilized Rate: 9. Gal/Min H = to Groundwater Level: 4 Ft Ds = Saturated : Ft D = of Hole: 5 Ft Hydraulic Conductivity 2.46E-04 cfs/ft 2 ft.head

EFILTRATION TEST LOG - E-8 Client: C3TS Job # 3409509 Site: NW 7th Avenue and NW 7th Street Test # 8 Project: Glenroyal East Phase Roadway and Drainage Improvements Date: 8/20/2009 3.50 Auger Diameter: 0 inches Tube : 5 Ft Increment Gal/Min 8.0 2 7.0 3 7.0 4 7.0 5 7.0 6 7.0 7 7.0 3-INCH ASPHALT 8 7.0 0-2.0 FILL-SAND, fine, brown 9 7.0 2.0-3.0 FILL-LIMEROCK, with sand, brown 0 7.0 3.0-5.0 LIMESTONE, with sand, tan Q = Average Stabilized Rate: 7. Gal/Min H = to Groundwater Level: 3.5 Ft Ds = Saturated :.5 Ft D = of Hole: 5 Ft Hydraulic Conductivity 2.5E-04 cfs/ft 2 ft.head

EFILTRATION TEST LOG - E-9 Client: C3TS Job # 3409509 Site: NW 7th Avenue and NW 7th Street Test # 9 Project: Glenroyal East Phase Roadway and Drainage Improvements Date: 8/2/2009 4.00 Auger Diameter: 0 inches Tube : 5 Ft Increment Gal/Min 0.0 2 9.0 3 7.0 4 5.0 5 5.0 6 5.0 7 5.0 4 /2-INCH ASPHALT 8 5.0 0-2.0 FILL-SAND, with limerock, fine, brown 9 5.0 2.0 5.0 LIMESTONE, with sand, tan 0 5.0 Q = Average Stabilized Rate: 6. Gal/Min H = to Groundwater Level: 4 Ft Ds = Saturated : Ft D = of Hole: 5 Ft Hydraulic Conductivity.65E-04 cfs/ft 2 ft.head