Calibrating the Soquel-Aptos PRMS Model to Streamflow Data Using PEST

Similar documents
1 THE USGS MODULAR MODELING SYSTEM MODEL OF THE UPPER COSUMNES RIVER

Santa Cruz Mid-County Groundwater Model: PRMS Setup Page 1

GROUNDWATER MODELING A PRIMER FOR THE COMMUNITY

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

BAEN 673 / February 18, 2016 Hydrologic Processes

Subject: Groundwater Model Update and Scope for Fiscal Year

Mid-County Basin Groundwater Hydrology and Management

CONTINUOUS RAINFALL-RUN OFF SIMULATION USING SMA ALGORITHM

Introduction. Welcome to the Belgium Study Abroad Program. Courses:

Study of Hydrology based on Climate Changes Simulation Using SWAT Model At Jatiluhur Reservoir Catchment Area

M.L. Kavvas, Z. Q. Chen, M. Anderson, L. Liang, N. Ohara Hydrologic Research Laboratory, Civil and Environmental Engineering, UC Davis

Southern Sierra Headwaters Tour

Turbidity Monitoring Under Ice Cover in NYC DEP

Measuring and Valuing Ecosystem Services: InVEST and Modeling Approaches

M.L. Kavvas, Z. Q. Chen, M. Anderson, L. Liang, N. Ohara Hydrologic Research Laboratory, Civil and Environmental Engineering, UC Davis

Forests and Water in the Sierra Nevada. Roger Bales, Sierra Nevada Research Institute, UC Merced

Technical Memorandum

Application of the PRMS model in the Zhenjiangguan watershed in the Upper Minjiang River basin

Impacts of 2015 Drought on Streamflow in the Columbia River Basin

Effect of forest management on water yields & other ecosystem services in Sierra Nevada forests UCB/UC Merced/UCANR project

Mapping Groundwater Recharge Rates Under Multiple Future Climate Scenarios in Southwest Michigan

Influence of evapotranspiration estimates on the water balance of sugarcane cropping system in the Hawaiian island of Maui

Application of a Basin Scale Hydrological Model for Characterizing flow and Drought Trend

Hydrologic Cycle. Water Availabilty. Surface Water. Groundwater

TECHNICAL NOTE: ESTIMATION OF FRESH WATER INFLOW TO BAYS FROM GAGED AND UNGAGED WATERSHEDS. T. Lee, R. Srinivasan, J. Moon, N.

Toward an Improvement of the Hydrological Performance of the SWAT Model under Snow Cover and during Snowmelt

Ottawa County Water Resources Study Phase 2

Evaluation of Swat for Modelling the Water Balance and Water Yield in Yerrakalva River Basin, A.P. National Institute of Hydrology, Roorkee

Thanks to Bill Elliot, Research Leader U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service

Simulation of Basin Runoff due to Rainfall and Snowmelt

Utilization of the SWAT Model and Remote Sensing to Demonstrate the Effects of Shrub Encroachment on a Small Watershed

USDA-NRCS, Portland, Oregon

2. Watershed Modeling using HSPF

Institute of Water and Flood Management, BUET, Dhaka. *Corresponding Author, >

Simulation of basin runoff due to rainfall and snowmelt

Lecture 9A: Drainage Basins

Hydrologic Modeling with the Distributed-Hydrology- Soils- Vegetation Model (DHSVM)

The Impact of Wetland Drainage on the Hydrology of a Northern Prairie Watershed

Prairie Hydrology. If weather variability increases, this could degrade the viability of many aspects of ecosystems, human activities and economy

Ungauged drainage basins: Investigation on the basin of Peneios River, Thessaly, Greece

Physically-based Distributed Hydrologic Modeling

PRMS-IV, the Precipitation-Runoff Modeling System, Version 4

are sufficiently different that his models are not useful to us at this stage. We anticipate, however, that he can provide submodels

Hydrology Review, New paradigms, and Challenges

DEPARTMENT OF GEOGRAPHY POST GRADUATE GOVT. COLLEGE FOR GIRLS.SECTOR-11 CHANDIGARH CLASS-B.A.II PAPER-A RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT: WORLD PATTERNS

Soquel-Aptos Water. Let s get to the right questions

Texas A & M University and U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Hydrologic Modeling Inventory Model Description Form

Surface Water Accounting Model, SWAc linking surface flow and recharge processes to groundwater models

Scale Effects in Large Scale Watershed Modeling

Estimating Groundwater Recharge under Upland and Depression Using a Simple Soil Water Balance Model

Topography and the Spatial Distribution of Groundwater Recharge and Evapotranspiration:

Workshop 1 Our Groundwater and Surfacewaters are Connected and We are What We Drink Hosted by: Lackawanna County Conservation District

Watersheds and the Hydrologic Cycle

Modelling of the Hydrology, Soil Erosion and Sediment transport processes in the Lake Tana Catchments of Blue Nile River Basin, Ethiopia

Runoff Processes. Daene C. McKinney

GIS Applications in Water Resources Engineering

General Groundwater Concepts

Effects of land use change on the water resources of the Basoda basin using the SWAT model

2.3 Water Budget Data In Ontario

WMS Tools For Computing Hydrologic Modeling Parameters

Assessing Real Time - Drainage Water Management

San Diego Hydrology Model (SDHM 3.0) Reviewer Workshop. Doug Beyerlein, P.E., P.H., D.WRE Clear Creek Solutions, Inc. Mill Creek, Washington

Introduction to Hydrological Models. University of Oklahoma/HyDROS Module 1.2

SNAMP water research. Topics covered

Malfunctioning of streamgauge stations in the Chanza and Arochete rivers (Huelva, Spain) detected from hydrological modeling with SWAT.

Hydrologic Cycle. Rain Shadow:

Comparative analysis of SWAT model with Coupled SWAT-MODFLOW model for Gibbs Farm Watershed in Georgia

Managing Forests for Snowpack Storage & Water Yield

Estimating Groundwater Recharge within Wisconsin s Central Sands

Hydrologic response to conifer removal and upslope harvest in a montane meadow

Forecast Informed Reservoir Operations (FIRO) ERDC Hydrologic Investigations

Report. Environmental Water Demands. Butte County Department of Water and Resource Conservation Integrated Water Resources Plan.

AN INTEGRATED GROUNDWATER RECHARGE AND FLOW MODEL TO PREDICT BASE FLOW

Hydromodification Computer Modeling

USGS Watershed Model Evolution RRM(1972) to GSFLOW(2012) George Leavesley, USGS Retired and Steve Markstrom, USGS, Denver

Song Lake Water Budget

GreenPlan Modeling Tool User Guidance

MODELING SEDIMENT AND PHOSPHORUS YIELDS USING THE HSPF MODEL IN THE DEEP HOLLOW WATERSHED, MISSISSIPPI

Estimating water needs of alfalfa and using ET to schedule Irrigation

SECTION IV WATERSHED TECHNICAL ANALYSIS

Prairie Hydrological Model Study Progress Report, April 2008

Collaboratively Modeling Water Resources in the Truckee-Carson River System

Representing the Integrated Water Cycle in Community Earth System Model

Hands-on Session. Adrian L. Vogl Stanford University

HYDROLOGIC MODELING OF THE APALACHICOLA CHATTAHOOCHEE FLINT RIVER BASIN USING THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PRECIPITATION RUNOFF MODELING SYSTEM

Hydrologic Model of the Vermilion River Watershed for Streamflow Simulations

Metal Fate and Transport Simulation Using SWAT in the Tri-State Mining District

Integrating wetlands and riparian zones in regional hydrological modelling

Watersheds and the Hydrologic Cycle

Model to assess the impacts of external drivers on the hydrology of the Ganges River Basin

Draft Fact Sheet Butte County Stable Isotope Recharge Study

Rainfall, Runoff and Peak Flows: Calibration of Hydrologic Design Methods for the Kansas City Area

Using Information from Data Rich Sites to Improve Prediction at Data Limited Sites

Hydrologic Modeling of Cedar Creek Watershed using SWAT

Forecasting Hydrological Processes under Combined Climate and Land-Use/Cover Change Scenarios

Assessing the impact of projected climate changes on small coastal basins of the Western US

APPLICATION OF SWAT MODEL TO THE STUDY AREA

Michael Cahn and Barry Farrara, UC Cooperative Extension, Monterey Tom Bottoms and Tim Hartz, UC Davis

LARGE SCALE SOIL MOISTURE MODELLING

Transcription:

Calibrating the Soquel-Aptos PRMS Model to Streamflow Data Using PEST Cameron Tana Georgina King HydroMetrics Water Resources Inc. California Water Environmental and Modeling Forum 2015 Annual Meeting Program March 10, 2015

Presentation Outline Study Purpose PRMS Model Model Input Data PEST Model Calibration Model Results

Study Purpose Develop a tool to estimate rainfall vs. deep groundwater recharge relationship Be able to examine how deep groundwater recharge changes spatially and over time Develop information that can be used to determine drought curtailment criteria

Precipitation-Runoff Modeling System (PRMS) USGS developed modeling system Distributed-parameter, physically based hydrologic model USGS provided support and assistance developing the Soquel-Aptos model

Model Input Data Develop Hydrologic Response Units (HRU) HRU attributes Land use Soils Vegetation type Canopy cover Climate data Precipitation Maximum and minimum temperature Model period from Water Year 1984 through Water Year 2009

Groundwater Reservoir Stream and/or Groundwater Reservoir Soil-Zone Reservoir Stream and/or Soil-Zone Reservoir PRMS HRU Components Solar Radiation and Fluxes Evaporation Sublimation Precipitation Air temperature Plant Canopy Interception Evaporation & Transpiration Throughfall Throughfall Snow Pack Throughfall Evaporation Snowmelt Surface runoff Upslope Flow Impervious-Zone Reservoir Fast and Slow Interflow Soil-Zone Reservoir Groundwater Recharge Upslope Flow Groundwater Reservoir Groundwater flow Groundwater Sink Elements and text in light gray are part of PRMS but were not used in the Soquel-Aptos PRMS model

How HRUs are Delineated NRCS Watersheds GIS Watersheds Aquifer Outcrops Land Use "J "J + U + U + U + U + U + "J U Gages + U

Primary Spatial Layers HRU Parameters and Attributes calculated from Primary Layer DEM Aspect Slope Elevation Land Cover Cover Type Root Depth Winter Rain Interception Summer Rain Interception % Impervious SSURGO Soil depth Available Water Content % Clay % Sand Canopy Density Summer Density Winter Density Spatial HRU Parameters PRMS Parameter HRU Attribute HRU parameters from a combination of attributes and parameters Root Depth Minimum of Soil Depth Rooting Depth Product of Available Water Content Rooting Depth Minimum of 18 x AWC Average of % Clay % Sand Rooting Depth Soil Moisture Maximum Soil Recharge Maximum Soil Type Aspect Elevation Max Temperature Adjustment Min Temperature Adjustment Air Temperature Coefficient for Evapotranspiration For details on calculations, see: wwwbrr.cr.usgs.gov/projects/sw_mows/software/gsflow_s/input_instructions/modelattributes/hruattributes.htm

Stepwise Model Calibration Manual calibration Solar radiation Potential evapotranspiration Calibration with PEST Streamflow Steps recommended by USGS

Solar Radiation PRMS calculates solar radiation for each HRU Based on slope, aspect, and day of year Calibrate monthly relationship between air temperature and solar radiation Calibrate to mean monthly solar radiation at local CIMIS station

Potential Evapotranspiration PRMS calculates using modified Jensen-Haise Based on air temperature and solar radiation Calibrate monthly Jensen-Haise coefficient Due to lack of local data, calibrated to mean monthly values from PET maps by National Weather Service

Streamflow 10 gages

Groundwater Reservoir Stream and/or Groundwater Reservoir Soil-Zone Reservoir Stream and/or Soil-Zone Reservoir Calibrate Soil Zone Parameters 15 Parameters Recommended by USGS Coefficients for flow routing Storage capacities Percentage area contributing to runoff Evaporation & Transpiration Evaporation Upslope Flow Soil-Zone Reservoir Impervious-Zone Reservoir Surface runoff Fast and Slow Interflow Groundwater Recharge Upslope Flow Groundwater Reservoir Groundwater flow Groundwater Sink

Grouping by Geology Calibration Zones Group 1 2 3 4 HARDROCK(4) PURISIMA (2) Undifferentiated PURISIMA (3) AROMAS (1)

The PEST Model (Batch File) PAR2PAR PRMS TSPROC

Calibrate Soil Zone Parameters PAR2PAR Translates Zone Based Parameter Values to HRU Parameter Values Creates HRU Based PRMS Input PRMS TSPROC

Calibration to Streamflow PAR2PAR PRMS TSPROC Process Streamflow Timeseries Data Daily Mean annual Monthly mean Mean monthly Nash-Sutcliffe

Daily Calibration Plots from PRMS Gage 5 Red = Measured Blue = Simulated Gage 8 Green = Measured Yellow = Simulated

Daily Calibration Data from PRMS Gage 5 Red = Measured Blue = Simulated Gage 8 Green = Measured Yellow = Simulated

Mean Annual Flow Rate "J 1 +U +U 4 3 "J 2 +U 5 +U 6 910 +U "J +U 7 +U 8

Model Calibration Monthly Mean Mean Monthly "J 1 +U +U 4 3 "J 2 +U 5 +U 6 910 +U "J +U 7 +U 8

Monthly Mean Flow Rate Calibration Statistics Mean Error = -0.4 Absolute Mean Error = 3.7 Standard Deviation = 8.7 Standard Deviation/Range = 1%

Nash-Sutcliffe Goodness of Fit Gage NS < 0 1 1989 2 1985, 1987, 1994 3 none 4 none 5 none 6 1985 7 1988 8 1988, 1994 9 1985, 1992 10 NA

Nash-Sutcliffe Goodness of Fit One day causes NS < 0 Removing one day, moves 1989 NS to 0.4

Model Results 4 Purisima Aquifer 2 3 1 P a c i f i c O c e a n Aromas Aquifer Purisima = 51 miles 2 Aromas = 14 miles 2 All units in Acre-Feet per Year

4 Year Deep Recharge, acre-feet Drought Curtailment Criteria Based on recharge shortfall estimated from 3 year rainfall totals, SqCWD declared Stage 3 drought curtailment in 2014 120,000 100,000 Santa Cruz Stn Identified False Positive Allowable Shortfall Unidentified 97 in. 80,000 thru 2/15 60,000 40,000 20,000 0 Stage 4 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 4 Year Rainfall through March

Acknowledgements Soquel Creek Water District Central Water District City of Santa Cruz US Geological Survey