Summary of Preliminary Study Result for Technical Cooperation Project 1. Title of the Cooperation Project, Relevant Project Report The Project for Bridge Construction in Southeast Sulawesi Province Project Activity: Reconstruction of 19 Bridges 2. Categorization and its reason Category B Reasons The scoping revealed that all of the environmental impacts associated with the project is not significant on the social and natural environmental areas due to the small scale reconstruction of bridges required on the existing national/provincial/local road. The Indonesian EIA law prescripts that full scale EIA is not required for bridges not longer than 500 meters. However, an IEE level (UKL+UPL) report, and an approval procedure by the provincial environmental management agency (BAPEDALDA), are both required before construction. With regard to social matters, small scale land acquisition might be caused by reconstruction structures at the some project sites (No. 1, 4, 12, 18 and 20). Although the Indonesian government has an appropriate law as well as procedures for compensation, the Japan s Government should monitor a negotiation between land owners and the project proponent (PU). Furthermore, the Indonesian procedure does not include any system of public involvement in case of an IEE level (UKL+UPL). Hence the proponent in cooperation with the JICA Study Team should hold a stakeholder meeting for consensus on the construction in the basic design stage from the view of JICA s environmental and social consideration guidelines. With regard to natural environment issues, the proposed bridges are not located in sensitive or protected areas excepting No. 18, 19 which are located in the North Buton Wildlife Sanctuary. According to the discussion with the Ministry of Forestry which is in charge of environmental conservation in Indonesia, the reconstruction of those bridges could be implemented based on the MOU between PU and the Ministry of Forestry considering the Project is a kind of improvement activity not new construction one. Taking these into the consideration, it would be appropriate that the project is categorized as Category B. 1
3. Outline of the Location (Maps, Environmental and Social Condition, Problems and so on) (1) Project Location Project site is located in South Sulawesi Province as shown in Figure-1. Project Site in Buton Island Project Site in Main Island Figure-1 Location Map of the Project (Southeast Province, Indonesia) (2)Natural and Socio-economic Conditions The land use of the project area consists of mainly paddy field and cultivated areas for cacao, cashew nuts, and banana and secondary forests. No large scale villages as well as historical/cultural heritages, religious facilities, cemeteries were not found in the vicinity of project sites. North Buton Wildlife Sanctuary and Rawa Aopa Watumohai National Park are located near the sites. (refer to Figure-2) 2
North Buton Wildlife Sanctuary Rawa Aopa Watumohai Natioanl Park Figure-2 Protected Areas around Project Sites 4. Legal Framework of Environmental and Social Considerations (Law, Projects subject to EIA, Procedures, Information Disclosure and Stakeholder Participation) (1) Relevant Law for EIA / Environmental Permission Name of Law: -Law No. 23 of 1997 Environmental Management -Government Regulation No. 27 of 1999 on Environmental Impact Assessment - Decree of State Ministry for the Environment No. 17 of 2001 on Types of Business and/or Activity Plans that are required to be completed with the Environmental Impact Assessment - Decree of State Ministry for the Environment No.11 of 2006 on Types of Business and/or Activity Plans that are Required to be Completed with the Environmental Impact Assessment - Decree of state Ministry of Public Works No.17/2003 (2) Criteria of the full scale EIA and IEE Table -1 Criteria for a full scale of EIA/ IEE Category Laws Requirement of full scale EIA Requirement of IEE level UKL+UPL Decree of state Ministry of Env. No.11/2006 Decree of state Ministry of Public Works No.17/2003 Bridge Length>=500m - Propose from proponent to authority (NTB-BAPEDALDA) Major Town (50,000-500,000) :Bridge Length>=60m Medium Town(20,000-2000,000) :Bridge Length>=20m 3
According to the environmental management agency (BAPEDALDA), EIA category issues will be screened generally based on the proposal report from the proponent. However, the person in charge of the EIA section BAPEDALDA commented that only an IEE level report (UKL+UPL) will be required. This is because the degree of impact resulting from the project must be limited, and it will not be significant for social and natural environment issues. An IEE level (UKL+UPL) procedure is shown in the Figure-3. BAPEDALDA (Southeast Province) Project Screening Evaluation Committee (UKL+UPL) Project Proponent (Ministry of Public Works Screening based on regulations Project Description AMDAL500m>= UKL+UPL500m< Review on the Draft of (UKL+UPL) and establishment of Evaluation Committee <Establishment of Evaluation Committee> BAPEDALDA PU,NGO etc. Draft of UKL+UPL Evaluation on UKL+UPL (<7days) Revising UKL+UPL based on recommendation b ythe Comittee(<7days) Final Examination by BAPEDALDA Issueing Approval Figure-3 Procedures of Environmental Permission (UKL+UPL) 5. Outline of Relevant Agency and Institution which implement Project, EIA and so on Proponent of this project is the Ministry of Public Works (PU). On the other hand, the environmental organization whose permission for this project is required is the Southeast Sulawesi Provincial environmental management agency (BAPEDALDA). The organization of BAPEDALDA is shown in Figure-4. 4
Head of BAPEDALDA Secretary Head Section of Programme Head Section of Public Head Section of Law Head Section of Finance Section of Development and Capacity Section of Environmental Impact Prevention Section of Approval and Management Section of Monitoring and Recovery Sub-Section of Development Sub-Section of AMDAL (in charge of EIA) Sub-Section of Management Sub-Section of Monitoring Sub-Section of Development and Capacity Sub-Section of Evaluation Sub-Section of Permission Sub-Section of Environment and Recovery Figure-4 Organization of BAPEDALDA 6. Outline of the Project, Analysis of Alternatives (Proposed Project, Comparative Examination of Alternatives, Selected Project on the basis of the Preliminary Study) (1) Outline of the Project The project consists of reconstruction of 19 bridges (4bridges in Main Island and 15 bridges in Buton Island respectively). The list of proposed bridges and location are Table-2 and Figure-5. Table-2 List of Proposed Bridges No. Bridge No. Name of Bridge Existing Bridge Proposed Bridge Type Length Width Height Type Length Width Height <Main Island> 1 1 RorayaⅢBridge Baily 42.0 4.0 6.5 Concrete 50.0 7.0 6.5 2 3 Pinnango Bridge Timber 20.0 3.5 4.0 Concrete 25.0 7.0 3.5 3 4 R.RayaⅡBridge Baily 62.0 3.5 10.0 Concrete 62.0 7.0 10.0 4 7 Lapoa Bridge Timber 20.0 3.5 4.5 Concrete 25.0 7.0 4.5 <Buton Island> 5 8 Wamorapa Bridge Timber 19.0 1.5 2.0 Concrete 25.0 7.0 2.0 6 9 Labuan WolioⅢBridge Timber 16.0 1.5 3.5 Concrete 20.0 7.0 3.5 7 12 MaliganoⅡBridge Baily 30.0 4.0 4.3 Concrete 30.0 7.0 4.3 8 14 PakakaⅡBridge Timber 17.0 4.0 4.4 Concrete 20.0 7.0 4.4 9 15 Labungka Bridge Timber 8.1 4.0 4.0 Concrete 20.0 7.0 4.0 10 16 Tolie Bridge Timber 8.5 3.5 4.7 Concrete 20.0 7.0 4.0 11 17 Wakorumba Bridge Timber 25.0 3.5 4.5 Concrete 40.0 7.0 4.5 12 18 Siloi Bridge Baily 30.0 4.0 6.0 Concrete 35.0 7.0 6.0 13 19 SiloiⅡBridge Timber 15.0 3.5 4.0 Concrete 20.0 7.0 5.0 14 20 LantahiwoⅣBridge Baily 21.0 3.5 4.3 Concrete 30.0 7.0 4.3 15 21 Lambale Bridge Timber 17.0 3.5 3.2 Concrete 20.0 7.0 4.0 16 22 Pembulumemea Bridge Baily 18.0 3.5 3.6 Concrete 40.0 7.0 3.6 17 23 Uea Bridge Baily 15.0 3.5 4.2 Concrete 20.0 7.0 4.2 18 24 Lampangi Bridge Baily 18.5 3.5 3.0 Concrete 20.0 7.0 3.0 19 25 Ahara Bridge Timber 11.0 8.0 3.1 Concrete 20.0 7.0 3.1 5
Figure-5 Location of Proposed Bridges (2) Analysis of Alternatives The result of analysis of alternatives for the project is shown in Table-3. The alternatives include with and without project. With project was further divided into Alternatuve-1 conducting construction of all proposed bridges and Alternatuve-2, construction for the selected bridges. Alternatuve-1 is recommendable from the viewpoint of securing basic human needs (BHN). Table-3 Analysis of Alternatives No. Alternative Expected Environmental Impact With Project(Alternatuve-1) -Temporary water pollution, noise and vibration Reconstruction of the all occurring during the construction could be minimized proposed 19 bridges through an adequate implementation of mitigation measures. 1 -All of the road net work consisting of the national/provincial/local roads connecting Lapoa and Raterate at main island and North-South road and West-East road in Buton island will be completed. This will contribute to secure BHN and variable economical effects.(this positive impacts are based on the 6
2 3 With Project( Alternative-2) Reconstruction of the proposed bridges excepting 8 bridges located on the West-East provincial road in Buton Island Without Project (Option Zero) assumption of conducting pavement of the related roads by Indonesia Government.) -Temporary water pollution, noise and vibration occurring during the construction could be minimized through an adequate implementation of mitigation measures. -The road net work consisting of the national/provincial/local road connecting Lapoa and Raterate at main island and North-South road in Buton island will be completed. This will contribute to secure the accessibility for transmigration people In addition, the plan of construction of national road and ferry route connecting Kendri and Baubau will be encouraged by the reconstruction of those bridges. However, the isolated situation of Ereke will not be improved. -No natural environmental negative impacts are expected. -But equitable promotion of the local economy, poverty reduction and securing the BHN could not be achieved due to lack of stable transportation system. 7. Adverse Environmental and Social Impacts (Results of Scoping and Environmental and Social Considerations Studies) Scoping matrix for the project is shown in Table-4. The scoping revealed that all of the environmental impacts associated with the project is not significant on the social and natural environmental areas due to the small scale reconstruction of bridges required on the existing national/provincial/local road. 7
Table-4 Scoping Matrix The Project for Construction of Bridges in the Province of South Sulawesi Planning Phase Construction Phase Post Construction Social Environment Natural Environment Pollution No. Likely Impacts Overall Rating Land acquisition 1 Resettlement B B 2 Local economy such as employment and livelihood, etc. 3 Land use and utilization of local resources Social institutions such as social 4 infrastructure and local decision-making institutions 5 Existing social infrastructures and services 6 The poor, indigenous and ethnic people 7 Misdistribution of benefit and damage 8 Cultural heritage Change of Land use plan, Control of various activities by regulations for the construction Reclamation of Wetland, etc. Deforestation Alteration to ground by cut land, filling, drilling, tunnel, etc. Operation of Construction Equipment and Vehicles Construction of Roads, tollgates, parking lots, Access roads for bridges and other related facilities Traffic Restriction in construction area Influx of construction workers, construction of base camp Increase of Through Traffic Appearance/ Occupancy of Roads and related building structures B B B B B B 9 Local conflict of interests C C 10 Water Usage or Water Rights and Rights of Common B B 11 Sanitation 12 Hazards (Risk) Infectious diseases such as HIV/AIDS B B B 13 Accidents B B B B 14 Topography and Geographical features 15 Soil Erosion B B 16 Groundwater 17 Hydrological Situation 18 Coastal Zone 19 Flora, Fauna and Biodiversity B B B 20 Meteorology 21 Landscape 22 Global Warming 23 Air Pollution 24 Water Pollution B B B B 25 Soil Contamination 26 Waste B B B B B 27 Noise and Vibration B B B B 28 Ground Subsidence Increasing influx of settlers 8
29 Offensive Odor 30 Bottom sediment Rating: A: Serious impact is expected. B: Some impact is expected. C: Extent of impact is unknown (Examination is needed. Impacts may become clear as study progresses.) No Mark: Few impacts are expected. IEE/EIA is not necessary. 8. Mitigation for Key Impacts The proposed environmental mitigation measures for key items are shown in Table-5. Social Environment Natural Environment Pollution Table-5 Mitigation Measures and Monitoring Methodology Parameter Rating Description Mitigation Measures 1 No involuntarily Involuntary resettlement will be occurred -Implementation of public B but small scale land consultation in the Basic Design Resettlement acquisition will be -Law based procedure should be necessary. taken 2 Small scale change on Land use and existing land use due to -Implementation of public utilization of B temporary yard for consultation in the Basic Design local resources construction will be Law based procedure should be anticipated. taken 3 4 5 Local conflict of interests Water Usage or Water Rights and Rights of Common Hazards (Risk) Infectious diseases such as HIV/AIDS C B B 6 Accidents B 7 Soil erosion B 8 Flora, Fauna and Biodiversity B 9 Water pollution B 10 Waste B Land acquisition will be undertaken smoothly based on appropriate procedures. The river water is used for irrigation at upstream of the some of the Project bridges Inflow of labors from outside might cause increase of infectious diseases. Some concerns of traffic accidents caused by vehicles during construction and by local traffic after completion of the project. Serious soil erosion is observed at some river bank. The second forest of the both side of the riverbank might be destroyed. Illegal logging by labors is concerned. Degradation of water quality during pier construction is anticipated. Solid waste from construction yards and work camps -Implementation of public consultation in the Basic Design -To minimize impact to river users -Encourage to carry out civil works in dry season -Education through public consultation for village people and construction workers during construction -Traffic safety campaign through public consultation -Placement of safety equipments and assign safety staff Appropriate slope protection - Minimization of felling trees in the construction site -prohibit illegal cutting by labors -Establishment of the plan for avoiding water pollution -Appropriate treatment of construction waste and waste from work camp 9
11 Noise Vibration and B Noise and vibrations from construction activities -Fixed construction time/date (in respect of residential area, religion considerations, praying time) 9. Whether another Environmental and Social Considerations Study is required at this stage or not? The Indonesian EIA law prescripts that full scale EIA is not required for bridges not longer than 500 meters. However, an IEE level (UKL+UPL) report, and an approval procedure by the provincial environmental management agency (BAPEDALDA), might be required before construction. 10