Kimberly-Clark Australia. Combining a scientific approach with stakeholder partnerships to lightweight packaging

Similar documents
National Packaging Covenant II 2010 REPORT. October 2010 Kimberly-Clark Australia Pty Ltd 52 Alfred St, Milsons Point, NSW 2061 ACN

THE BUSINESS CASE FOR PACKAGING SUSTAINABILITY. D&D Technologies. The transition from clamshell to pouch-style packaging

Supply Chain Guidelines: Generating value and improving packaging sustainability throughout your supply chain

Australian Packaging Covenant 5 year plan. March 2011 Kimberly-Clark Australia Pty Ltd 52 Alfred St, Milsons Point, NSW 2061 ACN

PACKAGING ASSESSMENT CASE STUDY. Country Road Group. Building on success in a new business structure

Signatory Name: Kimberly-Clark Australia Pty Ltd

The content in this APC Annual Report is hereby endorsed by the Chief Executive Officer, or equivalent officer of the organisation.

The content in this APC Annual Report is hereby endorsed by the Chief Executive Officer, or equivalent officer of the organisation.

Towards a sustainable future KIMBERLY-CLARK AUSTRALIA & NEW ZEALAND SUSTAINABILITY 2020 PROGRESS REPORT (2017)

Signatory Name: ALDI Stores (Australia) a Limited Partnership

The content in this APC Annual Report is hereby endorsed by the Chief Executive Officer, or equivalent officer of the organisation.

Date printed: 16/08/2018 Simplot Australia Pty Ltd

Signatory Name: Vitaco Health Australia Pty Ltd

Signatory Name: Master Distributors Pty Ltd

Date printed: 20/08/2018 Three Threes Condiments Pty Ltd

The content in this APC Annual Report is hereby endorsed by the Chief Executive Officer, or equivalent officer of the organisation.

Signatory Name: Hally Labels Pty Ltd

Australian Packaging Covenant Action Plan 1 February February 2015

Signatory Name: CHEP Australia Pty Ltd

Australian Packaging Covenant

Penrite Oil Co Pty Ltd. APC Action Plan

Huhtamaki Australia Australian Packaging Covenant. Action Plan March 2011

Australian Packaging Covenant Action Plan

Signatory Name: Integria Healthcare (Australia) Pty Ltd

Action Responsibility Baseline data Targets Milestones

The Sustainable Packaging Guidelines (SPGs)

Signatory Name: Orora Packaging Australia Pty Ltd

Konica Minolta Business Solutions Australia

The content in this APC Annual Report is hereby endorsed by the Chief Executive Officer, or equivalent officer of the organisation.

The content in this APC Annual Report is hereby endorsed by the Chief Executive Officer, or equivalent officer of the organisation.

Australian Packaging Covenant. ACTION PLAN 2015 to 2017

SEMILSM17 Allocate work to teams and individuals

THE BUSINESS CASE FOR PACKAGING SUSTAINABILITY. Nestlé Australia. A consumer-driven approach to packaging

ARDEX Australia Pty Ltd

Australian Packaging Covenant

MMP Industrial Pty Ltd Australian Packaging Covenant Action Plan

Signatory Name: SCA Hygiene Australasia Pty Ltd

AUSTRALIAN PACKAGING COVENANT

Signatory Name: Visy Industries Australia Pty Ltd

Master Distributors Pty. Ltd.

Rain Bird (Australia) Pty Ltd. Australian Packaging Covenant. Action Plan

PACKAGING ASSESSMENT CASE STUDIES. Haigh s Chocolates. A packaging assessment case study

Signatory Name: Key Pharmaceuticals Pty Ltd

Signatory Name: Ward McKenzie Pty Ltd

The specialists in glass & plastic packaging COSPAK PTY LTD AUSTRALIAN PACKAGING COVENANT (APC) ACTION PLAN

The content in this APC Annual Report is hereby endorsed by the Chief Executive Officer, or equivalent officer of the organisation.

Brilliant Lighting (Australia) Pty Ltd. Australian Packaging Covenant ACTION PLAN

Signatory Name: Brown Forman Australia Pty Ltd

Date printed: 20/08/2018 Microsoft Regional Sales Corporation

Risk Management Update ISO Overview and Implications for Managers

EPSON AUSTRALIA PTY LTD AUSTRALIAN PACKAGING COVENANT ACTION PLAN 1 JULY 2015

The content in this APC Annual Report is hereby endorsed by the Chief Executive Officer, or equivalent officer of the organisation.

R.Weatherdon & Co Pty Ltd Australian Packaging Covenant Action Plan Executive Summary / Action Plan(?)

Reducing Food and Packaging Waste in the Egg Supply Chain

Date printed: 27/09/2018 Rokset Industries Pty Ltd

Signatory Name: Visy Industries

Role Description Manager Design and Creative Media

Australian Packaging Covenant

For further information about this ASSA ABLOY Australia APC 5 Year Action Plan, please contact:

Jasco Pty Ltd AUSTRALIAN PACKAGING COVENANT (APC) ACTION PLAN

Role Description Manager, ICT

Australian Packaging Covenant. LyondellBasell Australia Action Plan

Weis Frozen Foods The Australian Packaging Covenant

Reducing weight, reducing cost: lightweighting can ends

Australian Packaging Covenant

Role Description Director, Human Resources

Virgin Australia Australian Packaging Covenant Action Plan 1 July June 2021

Signatory Name: The Smith's Snackfoods Company Limited & Sakata R

Signatory Name: Anzpac Services (Australia) Pty Ltd

New Balance Australia Pty Ltd. Australian Packaging Covenant (APC) Action Plan

Robert Bosch (Australia)

AUSTRALIAN PACKAGING COVENANT ACTION PLANS

EUROPEAN GUIDE TO INDUSTRIAL INNOVATION

APC ACTION PLAN

These guidelines are supported by the retailer participants of ECRA s Order to Receipt Excellence Standing Working group:

Efficient Consumer Response Australasia

Weis Frozen Foods The Australian Packaging Covenant

Australian Packaging Covenant. Ac3on Plan 2012

CAPABILITY STATEMENT SUSTAINABILITY ADVISORY SERVICES CLEAN ENERGY. CORPORATION AUSTRALIA

Signatory Name: Blue Lake Milling Pty Ltd

PILOT PEN AUSTRALIA PTY LTD. Australian Packaging Covenant ACTION PLAN

National Packaging Covenant

McDougall St. Toowoomba,QLD, 4350 PH: FAX: Contact Officer: TONY ISO-AHO

Australian Packaging Covenant Action Plan

Materials and Packaging Policy

For personal use only

INVESTIGATING SEALING ISSUES IN FLEXIBLE PACKAGING PRODUCTS

OUR CUSTOMERS AND PRODUCTS

Signatory Name: Three Threes Condiments Pty Ltd

APC ACTION PLAN Table of Contents

Tooltechnic Systems (Aust) Pty Ltd. August 2016 June 2018

Signatory Name: ASSA ABLOY Australia Pty Ltd

Green growth cycle: energy efficiency in support of competitiveness

ROLE DESCRIPTION. VISION To make Sydney and NSW one of the world s most successful tourism and events destinations.

Musgrave Environmental & Social Accountability Policy. Working together to deliver sustainability

Level 2 Certificate in Warehousing and Storage Skills (QCF)

Signatory Name: Baiada Pty Limited

English version. Company Profile. Member of Rafael Group Bulgaria

THE BUSINESS CASE FOR PACKAGING SUSTAINABILITY. Bristol-Myers Squibb Australia Redesigning packaging to improve supply chain efficiencies

Signatory Name: Caltex Australia Petroleum Pty Ltd

Transcription:

Kimberly-Clark Australia Combining a scientific approach with stakeholder partnerships to lightweight packaging

Summary Kimberly-Clark Australia (KCA) manufactures consumer essentials including nappies, baby wipes and tissues. This case study describes how KCA has reduced costs while improving the environmental performance of its packaging by lightweighting film and at the same time ensuring that the structural and heat sealing properties are maintained or improved. The KCA approach is based on establishing and maintaining a specifications system, with measureable properties fully defined for the current packaging. This serves as a performance baseline. Rigorous testing, evaluation and comparison back to the baseline properties throughout the process, and the development of constructive stakeholder partnerships across the value chain then ensures successful outcomes. Lessons from the case study A dedicated packaging team can deliver business value and improve the sustainability of packaging through the implementation of rigorous packaging redevelopment processes that combine a strong technical focus with effective stakeholder engagement. A scientific approach to lightweighting adds rigour to the product development process and maximises the business benefits. This first requires the establishment of detailed quality and performance specifications for each packaging material category. The next step is to set quantifiable objectives in conjunction with stakeholders before undertaking trials and regularly reviewing performance against agreed objectives. It is important to reassure internal stakeholders throughout the process that lightweighting is not going to be achieved at the expense of other business priorities such as safety, quality or productivity. To underpin continuous improvement each packaging technologist or project manager at KCA undertakes an extensive program of packaging training. This is undertaken within the KCA packaging team, through networking with Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KCC) global packaging colleagues, and by running regular technical sessions with suppliers for all packaging material categories. About the company KCA began operating in Australia in 1926. Today, KCA manufactures consumer essentials including nappies, baby wipes and tissues. These products are marketed under global brands such as HUGGIES, POISE and KLEENEX. KCA has an in-house packaging team that works closely with suppliers, manufacturing and marketing teams to improve the cost and overall sustainability of packaging. The packaging team also provides project management and technical prepress support for all new and updated graphics. Products are packaged at KCA s manufacturing

facilities (mills) in Albury and Ingleburn (NSW) and Millicent (South Australia). The company has a broad aspirational goal of reducing the weight of its packaging by 10% by 2015 from a 2010 baseline. Improvements in packaging sustainability also support the achievement of Kimberly-Clark s global environmental objectives and targets. These include a commitment in their Global Sustainability 2015 plan to achieve 20% recycled or renewable content in all plastic packaging and a 10% reduction in the overall weight of flexible packaging. Corporate responsibility and sustainability are integral to Kimberley-Clark s business strategy and brands. More information is available from http://www.kimberly-clark.com.au/en/sustainability/. Figure 1: Kleenex Cottonelle and other KCA products place a strong emphasis on environmental attributes KCA s approach to lightweighting packaging Over the years KCA cross functional teams have worked with packaging and equipment suppliers, to continuously reduce the weight of its packaging including cartons, corrugates and plastic film. This has been achieved by: Eliminating outer boxes for Bath Tissue and Towel products in 1993 Changing plastic resins and processing technologies to reduce film gauge continuously since 2001 Adjusting product size, loading orientation and pack counts, which saves packaging and improves transport efficiency Marketing larger bulk pack formats which results in less packaging per unit of product Adopting a continuous product development focus which provides ongoing opportunities to optimise packaging and distribution. These initiatives have been driven by: The need to reduce costs and remain competitive in a challenging manufacturing environment The company s target of a 10% reduction in packaging by 2015 and overall sustainability objectives

The company s involvement with the Australian Packaging Covenant. KCA became a foundation signatory to the National Packaging Covenant, now known as the Australia Packaging Covenant (the Covenant), in September 1999. Other environmental strategies are also being pursued as part of the company s commitment to the Covenant. These include research into the potential use of recycled resins and support for the REDcycle plastic film recycling program in supermarkets. The challenges The challenges involved in developing lighter weight packaging include the need to: Engage multiple stakeholders Work around other manufacturing priorities at the mill to trial new packaging materials and processes Ensure that thinner films maintain the quality, premium look and feel that is required by the marketing team. These challenges and the strategies that KCA has developed to address them are summarised in Table 1. Table 1: Challenges associated with lightweighting packaging Challenge Managing the project with many KCA stakeholders including operations, marketing, procurement, packaging, legal, distribution and logistics. For example, operations people often feel that lighter weight packaging won t run as well in their equipment. Progressing the project while accommodating business priorities including new product launches and upgrades Maintain the premium look of packaging by ensuring consistent, high quality printing Strategies Work with all stakeholders at the start of the process to: o Set measurable objectives o Establish roles, responsibilities and tasks for each stakeholder o Agree to the process that will be followed. Provide regular feedback on progress using measures relevant to each stakeholder. Apply Lean manufacturing principles to streamline the packaging development process. Develop a 12 month plan with key milestones including when trials are expected to be undertaken. Conduct and evaluate trials beginning with a specific pack type and progressively expand to additional ranges and sizes. Don t run any trials until there is confidence that the trials are likely to be successful. Start trials at a small scale and build up to longer duration trials. Communicate achievements as they are made. Ensure high quality printing by updating press profiles and conducting print trials. Select packaging suppliers who manage printing by numbers (i.e. apply spectro-densitometry), establish optimum press running conditions and run to profile every time a new batch of packaging is printed.

Ensure packaging suppliers and prepress houses work as a team with internal packaging and marketing teams. Maintain a focus throughout the process on the needs of the endconsumer. A scientific approach to lightweighting: the Kleenex Cottonelle example The lightweighting project for Kleenex Cottonelle tissue wrapping film began by establishing the objectives of the project with the packaging supplier and all internal stakeholders. The properties of the current packaging material were reviewed and clear specifications were established for the new resin. The aim was to reduce the gauge of the film by formulating a resin with: Higher stiffness Wider sealing temperature range Lower seal initiation temperature. Quality and financial targets were established and project status and next steps were reviewed in monthly development meetings with the supplier and internal stakeholders. Operational staff were concerned that the lighter film could tear, burn or have difficulties sealing during the production process. This was addressed by: Paying careful attention to quality control systems at the resin supplier to ensure that the quality of the new material would be consistent, before it was used in trials. This involved material tests and ongoing dialogue with suppliers through meetings and site visits. Explaining the key properties of the new resin compared to the old resin, including a wider sealing temperature window that gave the mill operators confidence to run a trial. Other benefits that were highlighted included the higher film stiffness which enables easier wrapping and the lower sealing temperature which enables maintenance or improvement of run speed and equipment downtime. Undertaking trials and ensuring that any performance issues were addressed through meetings between the packaging team, suppliers and operators. A phased approach was adopted for the trials. A very limited trial was undertaken first, and then after a review a full day trial was undertaken before ramping up production across 3-4 stock keeping units (SKUs). Carefully integrating trials with the production schedule. If failures occurred then follow up meetings were held with suppliers to determine causes and the corrective actions required. KCA s Marketing team were engaged in the process as packaging samples were developed. Their primary concern was to ensure that the thinner packaging material did not compromise the premium look of the product. This concern was addressed by putting a lot of effort into the printing process to avoid the crinkly sound that can result from thinner films; and by continually working with prepress suppliers to trial, develop

and implement new plate technologies. It is important to continually reassure stakeholders throughout the process that lightweighting is not going to be achieved at the expense of other criteria such as quality or productivity. Cost savings and sustainability benefits have been achieved over time through great teamwork across functions (packaging, mills, marketing, sales, procurement, distribution and supply chain) and with our supplier partners. Our technical success has been facilitated by establishing detailed packaging specifications and reviewing our performance against quantifiable metrics. Frank Bova, Packaging Manager, Product Supply, Kimberly-Clark Australia The benefits Benefits in the Kleenex Cottonelle example The Kleenex Cottonelle project demonstrates that production benefits are also achievable if projects are scoped and implemented appropriately. A 13% reduction in film weight has been obtained by using higher quality resin that can be sealed at a lower temperature, resulting in reduced energy inputs and improved productivity. It is possible to substitute the resin formulation with one that gives higher film stiffness, reduces film thickness, lowers the sealing temperature, widens the sealing temperature window and give packaging material savings all at the same time. If films can be sealed at lower temperate the speed of the packaging machinery can be increased, because it doesn t take as long to reach the sealing temperature and the heating time doesn t need to be as long. Recent improvements in palletising efficiency also translated into distribution and warehouse benefits in KCA retailer warehouses. Benefits of packaging improvements at KCA overall Lightweighting, packaging material substitution, optimisation of the printing process and improving pallet cubic utilisation at KCA have delivered savings over $10m over the past 12 years. KCA s Light weighting whilst maintaining packaging functionality approach reduces the quantity of raw materials required and minimises environmental impacts associated with manufacturing and transport. KCA received awards at the 2007, 2008 and 2009 Packaging Evolution Awards including an additional best in show award in 2007. Public recognition of KCA s achievements through these awards assisted the packaging team to promote the benefits of sustainability and cost reductions to management. This helped the packaging team to build their profile within the company and to demonstrate the value that a professional packaging team can deliver.

Selling the benefits of a project to stakeholders: keys to success Build trust over time To achieve lightweighting improvements over time, it is important to develop trust with each of the key stakeholders involved in the process. Trust is developed by understanding and responding to the concerns of each stakeholder throughout the process. It is also enhanced by recognising achievements and attributing success to the wider team including production teams, packaging suppliers, marketing and the packaging team. Combine quantifiable metrics with regular stakeholder communication There are two key aspects of the KCA approach to lightweighting packaging. The first is adopting a scientific approach. This means building a specifications platform and then setting objectives and regularly reviewing the performance of new materials and palletisation against current properties. The second is a partnership approach to working with stakeholders across the packaging value chain. Stakeholders are actively engaged in packaging reviews, provide input into objective setting and are provided with data on performance against those objectives.

Disclaimer All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced in any material form or transmitted to any other person without the prior written permission of the Australian Packaging Covenant Organisation Ltd. (APCO) except as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) (as amended) or unless expressly permitted in writing by APCO and all authorised material must at all times be acknowledged. Requests regarding the use of the information on this site for any purpose other than educational or personal non-commercial uses should be directed to apco@packagingcovenant.org.au. Level 4, 332 Kent St, Sydney NSW 2000 (02) 8381 3700 apco@packagingcovenant.org.au