THE OECD PROGRAM ON ADVERSE OUTCOME PATHWAYS (AOP)

Similar documents
Integrated Approaches to Testing and Assessment (IATA) ex. Skin Sensitisation

Use of Adverse Outcome Pathways (AOPs) to reduce uncertainty and animal use in chemical hazard and risk assessment

Catherine Willett, Humane Society of the United States, Humane Society International

Introduction to Adverse Outcome Pathways and the AOP Wiki

DEVELOPMENT OF INTEGRATED APPROACHES TO TESTING AND ASSESSMENT AT OECD

Pathway-based Approaches to Safety Assessment: development and use

Introduction and Overview of a Biological Pathway-Based Approach to Disease and Drug Discovery

EURL ECVAM. A broader role for greater impact. Maurice Whelan. Head of Systems Toxicology Unit and EURL ECVAM

Adverse Outcome Pathways: A Framework for Organizing Mechanistic Information to Improve Chemical Assessment

Evolving approaches to AOP development: observations from MOA frameworks to systems biology

The OECD activities on biocides and IATA

ADVERSE OUTCOME PATHWAYS: WHERE DO YOU START?

Problem Formulation: Lessons and Tools from Practical Applications Involving Systematic Review of Mechanistic Data

INDUSTRY S NEEDS FOR 21 ST CENTURY SAFETY SCIENCE & NON-ANIMAL APPROACHES: A UNILEVER PERSPECTIVE

Institute for In Vitro Sciences

The Role of Chemistry in Adverse Outcome Pathways. Paul Russell & Steve Gutsell Safety and Environmental Assurance Centre, Unilever April 2013

NON-ANIMAL SKIN SENSITIZATION TESTING UNDER REACH

Supporting document for evaluation and review of draft Guideline (GL) for Defined Approaches (DAs) for Skin Sensitisation

Adverse outcome pathways for grouping of nanomaterials

PERFORMANCE BASED VALIDATION APPROACHES AT OECD. Patience Browne Test Guidelines Programme, OECD SOT IVAMSS October 25, 2017

A new definition for animal-free testing. Replacing animalderived. regulatory in vitro methods.

Risk Management under the Chemicals Management Plan

2017 PROGRAM Hands-On Training

The OECD Framework for AOP Development and Application

Applicability of the AOP for Assessing Causality of Observations in Epidemiological Studies

Tox21: Opportunities& Challenges. Richard A. Becker Ph.D., DABT American Chemistry Council

The WHO Framework for Combined Exposures and MOA/AOP Analysis; Implications for Euromix. Euromix Kick Off Meeting

NON-ANIMAL APPROACHES TO SAFETY ASSESSMENT OF COSMETIC PRODUCTS. Cutting-Edge Science and Constant Innovation: The Keys to Success

ROLE OF OECD AND THE TEST GUIDELINES PROGRAMME IN THE REGULATORY ACCEPTANCE OF ALTERNATIVE METHODS

Development of a Non-Animal Testing Strategy for Ocular Hazard Labeling of Some Specific EPA-Regulated Products

Cosmetics Europe LRSS Programme

Advances in science: next generation of lab tools, models and testing platforms used in predictive toxicology

USERS HANDBOOK SUPPLEMENT TO THE GUIDANCE DOCUMENT FOR DEVELOPING AND ASSESSING AOPs

LSHB-CT

QSAR APPLICATION TOOLBOX, v 4.1 BASIC PRACTICAL TRAINING WORKSHOP. BARCELONA, SPAIN November, 2017 AGENDA

New methods: miniorgans

Gertrude-Emilia Costin, Ph.D., M.B.A.

Acceptance of New Technology. Richard Phillips, ExxonMobil Petroleum & Chemical CEFIC LRI 11th Annual Workshop, 19 November 2009

Mode of Action and Human Relevance Framework in the context of Classification and Labelling (CLH) and regulatory assessment of biocides and pesticides

Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Économiques Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development

OECD External Review (September 2015) Adverse Outcome Pathway 38: Protein Alkylation Leading to Liver Fibrosis

Harnessing Toxicity Testing in the 21 st Century to Help Train Chemists

Update of the WHO/IPCS Mode of Action Framework

Endocrine disruptors: EURL ECVAM activities related to validation

1. Support for Biological Plausibility of KERs MIE => KE1: Biological Plausibility of the MIE => KE1 is high. Histone Rationale: Upon the inhibition

Progress and Future Directions in Integrated Systems Toxicology. Mary McBride Agilent Technologies

Draft Guidance for describingcharacterising non-guideline in vitro test methods

Validation of the 21 st Century Toxicology Toolbox: Challenges, Opportunities, and the Way Forward

Using 21 st Century Science for Risk-related evaluations: An Overview of the NAS Risk21 Report

Scientific ifi Confidence Framework: 1) Analytical validation. 3) Utilization 4) Explicit documentation

Alternative Testverfahren und intelligente Teststrategien Position der EU-Kommission. Thomas Hartung & ECVAM Team.

Dosing for Controlled Exposure (DoCE): Dosing strategies for characterising in vitro dose-responses with increased relevance for in vivo extrapolation

Subcommittee on Distinguishing Adverse from Non-Adverse and Adaptive Effects

Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Économiques Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development

AN INTERNATIONAL COALITION ADVANCING A NEW PARADIGM FOR CHEMICAL SAFETY TESTING

A Strategy for Reducing Animal Use in the U.S. EPA's Endocrine Disruption Screening Program

Guidance Document for the Implementation of the Hazard-based Criteria to Identify Endocrine Disruptors

Addressing Complex Challenges Posed by Hazardous Substances

Detection of toxicity to reproduction for human pharmaceuticals. Explanatory slides agreed by EWG members

SYSTEMATIC APPROACH TO THE SAFETY ASSESSMENT OF NATURALS FOR USE IN CONSUMER PRODUCTS

Workshop report: Pathways-based approaches across the biosciences: Towards application in practice

ICH Topic S 6 Preclinical Safety Evaluation of Biotechnology-Derived Pharmaceuticals. Step 5

Introduction to Drug Design and Discovery

Genetic Toxicology Mini-Adverse Outcome Pathways (mini-aops) Azeddine Elhajouji March 22, 2018

Moving Towards Version 2.0 of Toxicity Testing in the 21 st Century and Application to Regulatory Decision Making

Cost Reduction in REACH Alternatives to Testing ChemicalWatch EXPO Berlin, April 2017 Peter Jenkinson CEHTRA

SEURAT-1: Why predictive safety science is important to regulatory acceptance of alternative methods

Guidance for the identification of endocrine disruptors in the context of Regulations (EU) No 528/2012 and (EC) No 1107/2009

Introduction to the AOP framework concept and online course

Guideline on the non-clinical requirements for radiopharmaceuticals

Mutagenic impurities: predicting alerting structures using in silico tools

Endocrine discuptors under REACH

The Food and Drug Administration Predictive Toxicology Roadmap and its Implementation

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL

Towards a future of scientific progress without the need for experimental animals: Global trends

Strategies for Assessment of Immunotoxicology in Preclinical Drug Development

London, 11 October 2006 Doc. Ref. EMEA/CHMP/BWP/271475/2006 COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE (CHMP)

Exploring new approaches to assess safety without animal testing

Process and mechanistic concepts in toxicity testing. Ronny Blust Department of Biology University of Antwerp

Glyphosate Research Scoping

Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Économiques Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development

Key Aspects of Non-Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacokinetics in the Evaluation of Safety

Standards for Safety Assessments of Food Additives produced Using Genetically Modified Microorganisms

The Integrated Biomedical Sciences Graduate Program

Panama City, Panama April, 12-15, Marcelo Mario Matos Moreira. The Brazilian Health Surveillance Agency (ANVISA)

Gettysburg Room Introduction to In Vitro Testing

Retrieval of gene information at NCBI

Leadscope Model Applier and the ICH M7 Impurities Guidelines Frequently Asked Questions

APPENDIX IV OECD GUIDELINES FOR TESTING OF CHEMICALS. 1- The OECD Test Guidelines submission and adoption process

significant concerns no or very low predictive power

Current State of the Science in Chemical Risk Assessment

Strategies for grouping chemicals to fill data gaps to assess genetic toxicity and genotoxic carcinogenicity

Replacement alternatives. The rule of 3R and the alternative methods. Alternative methods and REACH

Procedures of Application for Safety Assessment of Foods and Food Additives Produced by Recombinant DNA Techniques

Quality In Vitro Research Services

Interplay of Cells involved in Therapeutic Agent Immunogenicity. Robert G. Hamilton, Ph.D., D.ABMLI Professor of Medicine and Pathology

Maximizing opportunities towards achieving clinical success D R U G D I S C O V E R Y. Report Price Publication date

validation of the LuSens test method for skin sensitisation testing

Three recently approved in vivo genotoxicity test guidelines

Preclinical development for SSc indications NO COPY. a preclinical portfolio in a perfect world. Jörg Distler

Transcription:

THE OECD PROGRAM ON ADVERSE OUTCOME PATHWAYS (AOP) WC-9 Satellite meeting AOP 101 24 August 2014 Anne Gourmelon Principal Administrator OECD Test Guidelines Programme Environmental, Health and Safety Division

Launch of the Programme at OECD The AOP Development Programme was launched at OECD in 2012, under the umbrella of the Advisory Group on Molecular Screening and Toxicogenomics (Programme on Chemical Safety). AOPs are a central concept in future work at OECD on predictive toxicology, improving uses and applications of mechanistic information for both future testing and assessment needs. Several OECD groups are involved, interdisciplinary nature of the work

The Adverse Outcome Pathways concept AOPs delineate the documented, plausible, and testable processes by which a chemical induces molecular perturbations (Molecular Initiating Events) and the associated biological responses (Key Events) that describe how the molecular perturbations cause effects at the subcellular, cellular, tissue, organ, whole animal, and population levels of observation. Toxicant Molecular Interactions Cellular Responses Organ Responses Organism Responses Population Responses Chemical Properties Receptor/Ligand Interaction DNA Binding Protein Oxidation Gene activation Protein production Altered signaling Altered physiology Disrupted homeostasis Altered tissue development/ function Lethality Impaired Development Impaired Reproduction Structure Extinction

AOP for skin sensitisation Chemical Structure & Properties Molecular Initiating Event Cellular Response Organ Response Organism Response Metabolism Penetration Electrophilic substance Key Event 1 Covalent interaction with skin proteins Key Event 3 Dendritic Cells (DCs) Induction of inflammatory cytokines and surface molecules Mobilisation of DCs Key Event 2 Keratinocyte responses Activation of inflammatory cytokines Induction of cytoprotective genes Key Event 4 T-cell proliferation Histocompatibility complex presentation by DCs Activation of T cells Proliferation of activated T-cells Adverse Outcome Inflammation upon challenge with allergen The Adverse Outcome Pathway for Skin Sensitisation Initiated by Covalent Binding to Proteins; Part 1: Scientific Evidence Series on Testing and Assessment No.168 ENV/JM/MONO(2012)10/PART1 4

Mapping alternative methods to key events Chemical Structure & Properties Molecular Initiating Event Cellular Response Organ Response Organism Response Metabolism Penetration Electrophilic substance Key Event 1 Direct Peptide Reactivity Assay (DPRA) QSARs Key Event 3 Dendritic Cells (DCs) human Cell Line Activation Test (h-clat) Mobilisation of DCs Key Event 2 Keratinocyte responses Activation of inflammatory cytokines KeratinoSens Key Event 4 T-cell proliferation Histocompatibility complexes presentation by DCs Activation of T cells Proliferation of activated T-cells Adverse Outcome Inflammation upon challenge with allergen 5

AOP Development Programme: an horizontal activity at OECD The OECD programme on the development of AOPs addresses the needs of: the OECD Test Guidelines Programme for the identification of new in vitro test methods that are candidates to become OECD Test Guidelines; The OECD QSAR Project for the identification of new methods/profilers for grouping chemicals; the OECD Hazard Assessment activities for the development of IATAs for defined hazard endpoints. 6

Application of the AOP concept to support grouping of chemicals As the MIE in each AOP involves a rather specific interaction of chemicals with biological systems, it can be used as the basis for generating structure activity relationships, whether or not quantifiable. In turn, such information can be used for chemical grouping and read-across approaches, thus facilitating predictive and mechanism-based toxicology 7

Relevant documentation published at OECD Template format for project proposals Guidance document on developing and assessing AOP (2013), No. 184 Series Testing and Assessment User handbook (more practical and wikioriented than the guidance, under preparation)

Functioning of the AOP Development Programme at OECD The OECD Advisory Group on Molecular Screening and Toxicogenomics (EAGMST) is a large group of experts from various areas of toxicology. Experts are designated by governmental or nongovernmental affiliations (academia, agencies, industry, animal welfare groups, scientific societies, etc.) The EAGMST meets once a year before summer and holds a teleconference, usually in December to keep pace with new developments. 9

Functioning of the AOP Development Programme at OECD Project proposals to develop new AOPs can be made by members of EAGMST or the public (academia, scientific societies, industry groups, etc.) Project proposals can be submitted any time of the year to the Secretariat who makes them available to the EAGMST for their review. The AOP Development Programme maintains a rolling work plan, updated twice a year with new project proposals and new information on existing projects. Twice a year, project proposals are reviewed and included in the work plan if justified and in line with the objectives of the Programme.

Where can I find relevant information? A public web-page provides summary information to the public on the AOP development programme, including titles of AOP on the workplan and lead organisations/countries, relevant templates for making proposals, guidance on how to develop AOPs, etc. [http://www.oecd.org/env/ehs/testing/adverse -outcome-pathways-molecular-screening-andtoxicogenomics.htm]

Where can AOPs under development be found? A wiki-based interface has been developed to enable AOP description (MIE, KE, KER, AO) http://aopwiki.org see Kristie Sullivan s presentation The AOP wiki will be publicly launched by end of September 2014 All AOPs should be considered at this stage as drafts under development

13

14

Status of AOPs developed at OECD AOPs are scientific descriptive documents depicting interactions, events, outcome, etc.: as such, they have no regulatory implication AOP can be developed in parallel of scientific publications (OECD work does not preclude scientists to publish in the literature) AOPs can be seen as continuously developing, and OECD-agreed versions of AOPs can evolve as science progresses

Conclusions and take home messages AOP Development Programme is evolving fast with participation of multiple groups of experts in various areas of toxicology The public can make project proposals to develop AOPs (published guidance for users) AOPwiki soon publicly available (end Sept. 2014) to enable crowd-sourcing

Thank you for listening on a Sunday morning! anne.gourmelon@oecd.org