Review of HCFC-22: Metadata on Distributed Emissions. A. McCulloch. Emission Functions

Similar documents
Mr. Jean-Jacques Becker, Chair CDM Methodology Panel 20 Sept 2004 c/o CDM Secretariate UN Framework Convention on Climate Change sent by

Scenarios of ODSs and ODS substitutes. Guus Velders

Dr. Sébastien Gallet Speaker Marcel Morin (Akzo Nobel) November 24 th 2017

Sunyoung Park et al. Received and published: 19 June 2018

The role of the Montreal Protocol in protecting present and future climate: A scientific perspective

UNITED NATIONS FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON CLIMATE CHANGE

EMISSIONS OF FLUORINATED SUBSTITUTES FOR OZONE DEPLETING SUBSTANCES

Emissions of ozone-depleting halocarbons from China

The integrated global greenhouse gas observations and analysis system: WMO-GAW

CFCs - The Search. For Alternatives. Fluorocarbons

Looking Ahead: HCFCs, HFC, CTC and other Chemicals Addressing HCFC, CFC and HFC in a Package: World Bank and GEF Cooperation

PROPOSAL FOR A SCHEME TO PHASE DOWN HFCs

Committee The Finance and Expenditure Committee. Climate Change (Emissions Trading and Renewable Preference) Bill. This submission is made by

Q&A for CDM HFC 23 Incineration Projects

4. Stratospheric ozone depletion

New reactive nitrogen chemistry reshapes the relationship of ozone to its precursors 1

Stratospheric Chemistry HS 2017 Solution to Homework Problem Set 3

Table TSD-A.1 Source categories included under Section 202 Section 202 Source IPCC Sector IPCC Source Category Greenhouse Gases

Global Warming Potentials as revised in 2013

Subsidiary Body for Scientific and Technological Advice

New Jersey Clean Air Council Primer on Highly Warming Gases and Related Topics

HFC Emissions Report for Indonesia

HFCS, REFRIGERATION AND AIR-CONDITIONING: MINIMISING CLIMATE IMPACT, MAXIMISING SAFETY

(First Earth Summit-1992)

Abstract Process Economics Program Report No. 201 CHLOROFLUOROCARBON ALTERNATIVES (January 1991)

Yes, is attached. Yes, is attached.

1. World Meteorological Organization Global Ozone Research and Monitoring

Emission quantification of refrigerant CFCs, HCFCs and HFCs in megacity Lahore (Pakistan) and contributed ODPs and GWPs

HCFCs, HFCs and alternatives. April 7, 2009

The 2018 WMO/UNEP Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion

Eastern Asian emissions of anthropogenic halocarbons deduced from aircraft concentration data

Climate Benefits of a Rapid Global HFC Phase-Out

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

further reducing global warming

Statement of Mack McFarland, Ph.D. Global Environmental Manager

Halocarbon emissions estimated from Advanced Global Atmospheric Gases Experiment measured pollution events at Trinidad Head, California

Industry Activities to Promote Responsible Global HFC Management and Policies

Chapter 15 Air Pollution and Stratospheric Ozone Depletion

Submission to the CDM Executive Board on HFC-23 CDM projects

WMO/GAW observation system and greenhouse gases

Refrigerant Selection for Sustainability

Industry Activities to Promote Responsible Global HFC Management and Policies

Emissions of Selected Greenhouse Gases from a Landfill. Jim Hanson, Ph.D., PE Alex Sohn Nazli Yesiller, Ph.D. Derek Manheim, M.S.

Assessment for Decision-Makers

Welcome to the MARR WGs Session

Policies to Limit Emission of HFCs, PFCs, and SF6 in Japan

Achieving Multiple Objectives in the Phase-out of Ozone Depleting Substances

Merging the Transition to Next Generation HVAC Refrigerant Technology with Effective Climate Policy

Evaluation of R-449A as a Replacement for R-22 in Low and Medium Temperature Refrigeration

Refrigerant Selection for Sustainable Future

Development of HFC Regulations and Lessons Learned The Canadian Experience

TROPICS: insolation high year round, high sun angle and ~ constant duration

Emissions of Halogenated Compounds in East Asia Determined from Measurements at Jeju Island, Korea

CCSP 2.4 March 11, Convening Lead Authors: A.R. Ravishankara, NOAA; Michael J. Kurylo, NASA

HFCs and Climate Policy

Report from the 10 th Meeting of the Ozone Research Managers of the Parties to the Vienna Convention for the Protection of the Ozone Layer

Guidance: F Gas and Ozone Regulations Information Sheet GEN 2: Fluid Uses. What are F Gases? What are ODS?... 1

UNFCCC COP21 December 5, 2015 Paris, France. Industry Support for Responsible Global HFC Management and Policies

Recent Trends in Global Emissions of Hydrochlorofluorocarbons and Hydrofluorocarbons: Reflecting on the 2007 Adjustments to the Montreal Protocol

Comment on Draft U.S. Ozone Depleting Substances. Project Protocol Version 1.0 and the. Draft Imported Ozone Depleting Substances Project Protocol

#13: Ozone Depletion. ESD.864 Noelle Selin. Session 13

Taiwan Environmental Protection Administration OZONE LAYER PROTECTION:

Sunyoung Park et al. Received and published: 19 June 2018

Climate Change and Ozone Depletion

Pollutant Release and Transfer Register (Registro de Emisiones y Transferencia de Contaminantes)

GLOBAL EMISSION SOURCES OF GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS FROM INDUSTRIAL PROCESSES: SF 6

CHCI3) and chlorodifiuoromethane (HCFC-22): Reactive

ON SUBSTANCES THAT DEPLETE

Refrigeration Cycle. Definitions , , 11-46, 11-49,

Article 5 Ozone Depleting Substances Project Protocol

WMO/UNEP Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion: 2010 OF THE MONTREAL PROTOCOL ON SUBSTANCES

GLOBAL WARMING IMPACT OF LOW GWP CHILLER REFRIGERANTS: LCCP/TEWI vs GWP LCCP/TEWI vs Other Factors

The role of carbon dioxide in climate forcing from 1979 to 2004: introduction of the Annual Greenhouse Gas Index

Utilities Infrastructure Cooling Production. Purpose of Today s Presentation. Agenda. GLHN Architects & Engineers, Inc. APPA Institute Session 301C EU

Carbon Tax on Refrigerants

Consumer Cost Impacts of U.S. Ratification of the Kigali Amendment

New Regulations & Innovation

ODS and F-Gas: Obligations for Refrigerant, Air-Conditioning and Fire Suppressant Contractors

HFC Emissions Evaluation Using IPCC Methods

Reserve Special Topic: Ozone Depleting Substances Project Protocols

GREENHOUSE GAS PROTOCOL POLICY AND ACTION STANDARD

IMPACT EC F GAS REGULATION (EC 842/2006) AND PROPOSED GLOBAL WARMING LIMITS ON VACUUM WEB COATERS. James Stenhouse

PRESS BACKGROUNDER. Basic facts and data on the science and politics of ozone protection

September 16 th 2010 International Day for the Preservation of the Ozone Layer

Domestic Approaches to Address High- GWP HFCs

Project report on. Climate Change and Carbon Emission

Japan s National Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Fiscal Year 2016 (Final Figures 1 ) <Executive Summary>

Sustainable Purchasing Guide Furniture

The 2018 WMO/UNEP Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion

Original Research Long-Term Measurements of CFCs and SF 6 Concentrations in Air

Life Cycle Climate Performance Model for Residential Heat Pump Systems

RESOURCE, OZONE, AND GLOBAL WARMING IMPLICATIONS OF REFRIGERANT SELECTION FOR LARGE CHILLERS

Trifluoroacetic Acid and Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) or Hydrofluoro-olefines (HFOs)

AIRAH Refrigerants Update controls on refrigerants

Operational Excellence

Phase Down of HFC Consumption in the EU Assessment of Implications for the RAC Sector EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1 st DRAFT CONCEPT DOCUMENT:

Utilities Infrastructure Cooling Production 316. Purpose of Today s Presentation. Agenda. GLHN Architects & Engineers, Inc.

Monitoring of greenhouse gases and aerosols at Svalbard and Birkenes: Annual report 2009

Sources of Greenhouse Gases in East Asia (SOGG EA) Sources of Greenhouse Gases in East Asia (SOGG EA)

Transcription:

Review of HCFC-22: Metadata on Distributed Emissions A. McCulloch Emission Functions HCFC-22 (CHClF 2, chlorodifluoromethane) is used primarily within refrigeration and air conditioning systems as the working fluid. Some material is released into the atmosphere when these systems are first filled but the bulk of the losses occur subsequently during maintenance, or as the result of accidental damage or when the equipment is finally removed from service and scrapped. There are other minor uses in foam blowing and hermetically sealed systems. As a consequence of the delay between first use and release, it is necessary to calculate emissions from time series of data on production and sales into three end-use categories having short, medium and long-term "banking times". The calculation method is described in Midgley and Fisher (1993). Of the sales into "Short Banking Times" (mainly open cell foam), 83% are released in the year of manufacture and the remainder in the year following. Releases from "Medium Banking Times" (predominantly refrigeration) are distributed approximately normally about a 4.5 year mean following a 30% initial loss, so that all of the charge is expected to be lost within 10 years. Material in "Long Banking Times" applications is released at the rate of 2%/year. Emissions do not depend on the season of the year. Basic Data on Sales There is no single data set for global sales of any of the fluorocarbons. That compiled by industry (AFEAS, 2001) is compound specific and audited to ensure quality control, but has incomplete geographical coverage; production in China, India, Korea and Russia is not included. The data on production and consumption (the latter equating to sales) compiled by the United Nations Environment Programme to verify the application of the Montreal Protocol are neither compound specific nor audited although they do cover all parties to the Protocol (UNEP, 2002). UNEP data are reported as the aggregate total of all HCFCs in ODPtonnes (Ozone Depletion Potential multiplied by metric tonnes). Submissions by individual countries are incorporated into the UNEP database with no further checks and reported values have been revised, without explanation, several years after they were first submitted. These data sets have been amalgamated to provide global consumption values with defined quality and uncertainty and the distributed emissions described here were based on Midgley and McCulloch (1997) and Aucott et al. (1999). Geographical Distribution of Emissions

The calculated global emissions of HCFC-22 were distributed among countries using the distribution of CFC-12, calculated in McCulloch et al. (1994), as a surrogate. Within each country, emissions were distributed to individual gridsquares using the population distribution in Li (1996). Results are presented here as the percentage distribution among gridsquares, with no cutoff at low values. Absolute emission from each gridsquare in 1990 should be calculated by multiplying global emission for 1990 in Table 1 by the gridsquare percentages in Table 2. For other years, the distribution in Table 2 should be applied to the global emission for the appropriate year. While global emissions change relatively rapidly, distribution is affected only by relative economic activity and population dynamics, which have slower rates of change with time. It is expected that the distribution can be applied to the years 1985 to 1995 without significantly increasing uncertainty but this has not been tested. It can be applied to years beyond this range only with caution and new distributions for more recent years are under development. Time Series of Global Emissions Taken from McCulloch et al., 2002 (itself compiled from AFEAS, 2001 and UNEP, 2002), the time series (1943 to 2000) of HCFC-22 emissions and their uncertainties is shown in Table 1. Future emissions will be governed by the controls required by the Montreal Protocol and by the quantity of material currently in the "bank" (that is: material which is in use but has not yet been emitted). A scenario for future releases of HCFC-22 was described in Madronich and Velders (1999). This scenario has been updated and will be published in Fraser and Montzka (2003). Development In view of the changes brought about by the Montreal Protocol, it is proposed to revise the distribution functions to provide gridded data for the year 2000. A. McCulloch University of Bristol, UK mailing address: Barrymore, Marbury Road, Comberbach, Northwich, CW9 6AU, UK phone/fax: +44-1606-891604 e-mail: archie@marbury.u-net.com Table Year Annual HCFC-22 emission, Mg Mean + 2 SD - 2 SD

1947 0 0 0 1948 100 100 0 1949 100 200 100 1950 300 500 200 1951 500 700 300 1952 800 1100 500 1953 1200 1600 700 1954 1600 2200 1000 1955 2100 2900 1300 1956 3400 4500 2200 1957 3900 5400 2500 1958 4800 6500 3100 1959 6800 9100 4600 1960 8000 10700 5300 1961 8700 11500 5900 1962 10700 13900 7500 1963 13100 16700 9600 1964 16300 20500 12200 1965 19000 23900 14200 1966 23300 29000 17600 1967 27800 34700 20900 1968 33800 42200 25500 1969 41100 51400 30800 1970 44700 56000 33400 1971 49600 61400 37700 1972 54200 66500 42000

1973 62200 75100 49400 1974 70300 84400 56300 1975 71100 84500 57700 1976 80100 93800 66500 1977 89300 104100 74500 1978 97600 113300 81900 1979 104700 121500 87800 1980 113000 130600 95400 1981 119500 137700 101300 1982 121200 138000 104400 1983 133100 150100 116000 1984 142800 160500 125000 1985 148600 165800 131500 1986 157700 175300 140100 1987 166500 184200 148700 1988 185600 205400 165800 1989 210500 232800 188300 1990 217100 238600 195700 1991 226500 248200 204800 1992 235400 257300 213500 1993 236200 256500 215800 1994 241300 260500 222200 1995 247600 264800 230400 1996 263700 280900 246500 1997 257300 274300 240200 1998 256500 273500 239600

1999 266700 282700 250800 2000 267600 282400 252900 Table 1: Global Emissions of HCFC-22 (chlorodifluoromethane) from 1947 to 2000 Data in Mg (millions of grams or metric tonnes), SD=Standard Deviation Compiled by A. McCulloch (archie@marbury.u-net.com) Based on: McCulloch A., P.M. Midgley and P. Ashford Releases of Refrigerant Gases (CFC-12, HCFC-22 and HFC-134a) to the Atmosphere submitted to Atmos. Environ., 2002. Production, Sales and Atmospheric Releases of Fluorocarbons through 2000, Alternative Fluorocarbons Environmental Acceptability Study, Arlington, VA, USA, 2001. Production and Consumption of Ozone Depleting Substances, 1986-2000, Secretariat to the Montreal Protocol, United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi, Kenya, 2002. References AFEAS (Alternative Fluorocarbons Environmental Acceptability Study) Production, Sales and Atmospheric Releases of Fluorocarbons through 2000, AFEAS, Arlington, VA, USA, 2001 (see www.afeas.org). Aucott M.L., A. McCulloch, T.E. Graedel, G. Kleiman, P. Midgley and Yi-Fan Li, Anthropogenic emissions of trichloromethane (chloroform, CHCl 3 ) and chlorodifluoromethane (HCFC-22): Reactive Chlorine Emissions Inventory, J. Geophys. Res., 104(D7), 8405-8415, 1999. Fraser P. and S. Montzka, Controlled Substances and Other Source Gases, Ch. 1 of Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion: 2002, in preparation, WMO, Geneva, 2003. Li, Y.-Fan, Global Population Distribution Database, Canadian Global Emiss. Invent. Cent., Atmospheric Environment Service, Environment Canada, Downsview, Ont., 1996. Madronich S. and G.J.M. Velders, Halocarbon Scenarios for the Future Ozone Layer and Related Consequences, Ch. 11 of Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion: 1998, World Meteorological Organization Ozone Research and Monitoring Project Report No 44, WMO, Geneva, 1999.

McCulloch A., P.M. Midgley and D.A. Fisher, Distribution of emissions of chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) 11, 12, 113, 114 and 115 among reporting and non-reporting countries in 1986, Atmos. Environ., 28(16), 2567-2582, 1994. McCulloch A., P.M. Midgley and P. Ashford, Releases of Refrigerant Gases (CFC-12, HCFC-22 and HFC-134a) to the Atmosphere, submitted to Atmospheric Environment, 2002. Midgley P.M. and D.A. Fisher, The production and release to the atmosphere of chlorodifluoromethane (HCFC 22), Atmos. Environ., 27A (14), 2215-2223, 1993. Midgley P.M. and A. McCulloch, Estimated national releases to the atmosphere of chlorodifluoromethane (HCFC-22) during 1990, Atmos. Environ., 31(6), 809-811, 1997. UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme), Production and Consumption of Ozone Depleting Substances, 1986-2000, Secretariat to the Montreal Protocol, UNEP, Nairobi, Kenya, 2002 (see www.unep.org/ozone). (last modified 02/28/05)