APPENDIX A. 1. Background. 1.1 Existing Facilities. Page 1

Similar documents
Technical Specifications for Biosolids Management Services JEA Buckman Residuals Management Facility

Technical Specifications for Biosolids Management Services JEA Buckman Residuals Management Facility

Chapter 2: Description of Treatment Facilities

Role of Entrant s Firm. »» Final Design»» Completion of Funding. »» Engineering Services During Applications. »» Plant Startup and Filtration

City of Elk River Wastewater Treatment Facility Improvements. Achieving Wastewater Treatment Goals

WASTEWATER DEPARTMENT. Bentonville Wastewater Treatment Plant Facts:

VILLAGE OF ALGONQUIN 2014 WASTEWATER FACILITY PLAN UPDATE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Comprehensive Biosolids and Bioenergy Planning Authors: Cameron Clark* 1, Irina Lukicheva 1, Anna James 1, Kathy Rosinski 1, Dave Parry 1

HOW TO SAVE COSTS AND IMPROVE SUSTAINABILITY WHILE REDUCING EFFLUENT NITROGEN

CITY OF FORT MYERS SOUTH ADVANCED WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY

Current Treatment Approaches and Planning for the Future A Panel Discussion

CITY OF FORT MYERS CENTRAL ADVANCED WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY

Wastewater Treatment. Where does wastewater go when it leaves your house?

BEING GOOD STEWARDS: IMPROVING EFFLUENT QUALITY ON A BARRIER ISLAND. 1.0 Executive Summary

Wastewater Treatment Plant Facility Plan Update City Project # City of Liberty, Missouri May 6, 2013

W O C H H O L Z R E G I O N A L W A T E R R E C L A M A T I O N F A C I L I T Y O V E R V I E W

Agenda Item IV A-1 (TAHOE) Meeting Date: Douglas County Sewer Improvement District #1. Wastewater Reclamation Facilities

A Battle to Be the Best: A Comparison of Two Powerful Sidestream Treatment Technologies: Post Aerobic Digestion and Anammox

Tour of Altamonte Springs Regional Water Reclamation Facility

CHAPTER 1 - WASTEWATER SYSTEM DESCRIPTION

Performance Evaluation of the Moores Creek Advanced Water Resource Recovery Facility

Palmer Wastewater Treatment Plant 6.7 Alternative 7: Upgrade Existing Lagoons with New Percolation Bed

Altoona Westerly Wastewater Treatment Facility BNR Conversion with Wet Weather Accommodation

Texas A&M Wastewater Treatment Plant 9685 Whites Creek Rd., College Station, TX

Pre-RFP Meeting for Integrated Wastewater Treatment Plant Master Plan (MWWTP Master Plan) Presentation to Interested Parties. September 13, 2018

EVALUATION OF ENERGY RECOVERY OPTIONS FOR CONVERSION OF AEROBIC DIGESTERS TO ANAEROBIC DIGESTION

Fremont Water Pollution Control Center Plant Expansion for Nutrient Removal and Wet Weather Flow Treatment

Watertown Wastewater Facility Plan. August 11, 2015

Description: D05_100_OVW_015_PlantOverview.htm Plant Overview Durham Plant Overview Last Update: October 30, 2013 Purpose:

ENVIRONMENTAL VISITATION CENTER ALEGRIA WWTP

SECTION 2.0 WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT AND DISPOSAL SYSTEM DESCRIPTION

UDWQ POTW Nutrient Removal Cost Impact Study: Analysis of Tremonton City Wastewater Treatment Plant

Wastewater Plant Tour. There Is Gold In Them There Plants

WHEREAS, the Board has previously so adopted a wastewater supply system comprehensive plan, and

Orange County Utilities ANNUAL BIOSOLIDS REPORT

Capital Improvement Plan Update:

Providing Infrastructure Redundancy at the Rocky River WWTP. Timothy McCann AECOM Keith Bovard Rocky River WWTP

Biosolids Monthly Report

Technical Memorandum No. 1

Pima County Regional Optimization Master Plan

Palmer Wastewater Treatment Plant Environmental Impacts. A summary of the impacts of this treatment alternative are listed below:

Evaluation of Energy Recovery Options for Conversion of Aerobic Digesters to Anaerobic Digestion

Study Session Wastewater Enterprise, Proposed Improvement Projects and Projected Funding Needs Update

Tour of Regional Water Reclamation Facility

Post-Aerobic Digester with Bioaugmentation Pilot Study City of Meridian, ID WWTP PNCWA 2010

Energy Optimized Resource Recovery Project Presented By: Curtis Czarnecki, P.E.

Carbon Heat Energy Assessment and. (CHEApet) Tutorials: Carbon Footprint Primer

Executive Summary. ES.1 Introduction

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A. INTRODUCTION B. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS. 1. Conveyance System

Operation and Control of Multiple BNR Processes in One WWTP

PERMIT TO OPERATE SILVER CLOUD CT., MONTEREY, CA TELEPHONE (831) FAX (831)

Why THP Made Sense for TRA

Wastewater Treatment clarifier

PEIRCE ISLAND WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY UPGRADE

A -M WRF Solids Alternatives. Joint City Council Meeting

Gross Receipts Tax Exemption for Equipment Installed in a Wastewater Treatment Facility Opinion Number

Facilities Plan. Volume 2 Wastewater Facilities Assessment Report Executive Summary

FAIRMONT WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

Anderson Water Pollution Control Plant

The alternatives addressed in this EIR were selected in consideration of one or more of the following factors:

Total Makeover for Biosolids Handling at DC Water s Blue Plains Advanced Wastewater Treatment Plant. February 2015

CITY OF ALBANY BIOSOLIDS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM DEQ/EPA ANNUAL REPORT 2009

The following biological nutrient removal processes were evaluated in detail in the 2016 Liquid Processing Facilities Plan:

Design, Construction and Startup of the First Enhanced Nutrient Removal Plant in Maryland Funded by the Chesapeake Bay Restoration Fund

Irvine Ranch Water District SCAP Energy Committee Meeting IRWD Biosolids Project Update. August 26, 2015

Presentation Outline

Harrisburg Advanced Wastewater Treatment Facility Biosolids Facilities Improvement Plan Existing Conditions Report. February 2017

2017 Annual Performance Report

Lycoming County Water and Sewer Authority WWTP Mechanical Thickened Aerobic Digester Case Study

Kenosha Wastewater Treatment Plant - Energy Optimized Resource Recovery Project

City of Portsmouth Portsmouth, New Hampshire Public Works Department RFP #52-14 REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL

Chapter 5: Treatment Assessment Future Condition

6.2 Umgeni Water Owned Wastewater Works

Refinement of Nitrogen Removal from Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plants

January 25, Utility of the Future One City s Journey

Wastewater treatment objecives

CITY OF YUMA WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS. Cactus Moon Education, LLC.

SHAFDAN (Greater Tel Aviv Wastewater Treatment Plant) - Recent Upgrade and Expansion

City of Andover, Kansas Energy Assessment-Wastewater Treatment Plant

Advanced Aerobic Digestion. ThermAer. Autothermal Thermophilic Aerobic Digestion. Biosolids Treatment. Thermal Process Systems ThermAer Process

WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT MASTER PLAN 6. BUSINESS CASE EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES

ES.1 Solids Master Planning Background and Goals

ETHANOL DOSING OPTIMISATION IN BIOREACTOR. Blake Schneider. Blake Schneider, Duty Operator, Thakshila Balasuriya, Process Engineer, City of Gold Coast

Borough of Chambersburg Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion and Upgrade Project

OPTIMIZATION STUDY OF THE ST. MARY'S WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

Codigestion Case Studies Enhancing Energy Recovery From Sludge

Rehoboth Beach Commissioners Meeting Ocean Outfall & Treatment Plant Project Update July 26, Jeff Sturdevant Principal Kelvin George Principal

WEAO STUDENT DESIGN COMPETITION 2019 PROJECT STATEMENT

Emerging Issues in the Water/Wastewater Industry. Austin s Full-Scale Step-BNR Demonstration

The TRA CRWS Master Plan. Past, Present, & Future of CRWS. Kaylee Dusek, EIT, Garver Matt Jalbert, PE, TRA

Learning Wastewater Treatment

Duffin Creek Water Pollution Control Plant Technical Information

City of Redlands Wastewater Treatment Plant. Redlands, CA LOCATION: Carollo Engineers; CH2M HILL MBR MANUFACTURER: COMMENTS:

North Side WRP Master Plan Research and Development Department 2006 Seminar Series October 27, 2006 Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of

Since 2009, the 7-mil-gal-per-day (mgd)

PANEL DISCUSSION: PLANNING FOR SUSTAINABLE RESOURCE RECOVERY PROGRAMS

THE NEW DUBBO SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT UPGRADE. Glenn Clifford. Dubbo City Council

WEF Residuals and Biosolids Conference 2017

MUNCIE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT 5150 KILGORE AVE. MUNCIE, IN 47304

Transcription:

APPENDIX A PRELIMINARY TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS FOR BIOSOLIDS MANAGEMENT SERVICES JEA Buckman Residuals Management Facility 1. Background JEA is seeking biosolids management services from experienced biosolids management contractor(s) and service providers (the Contractor or Company ) that possess technical expertise in managing and beneficially reusing Class A, thermally dried biosolids pellets and Class B and unclassified dewatered cake biosolids for a large, municipal wastewater utility. JEA intends to award one continuing service contract for this work but reserves the right to issue more than one. Separate contracts may be utilized for management of biosolids from different JEA facilities. The operating contract(s) will remain valid for a minimum 10-year contract period. 1.1 Existing Facilities Dewatered cake biosolids from JEA s Buckman Residuals Management Facility (RMF), Blacks Ford Water Reclamation Facility (WRF), Monterey WRF, and future Greenland WRF will be included in the contract(s) for biosolids management services. The Blacks Ford WRF and Monterey WRF produce primarily Class B, aerobically digested and dewatered biosolids. The Greenland WRF will be a similar facility to the Blacks Ford WRF and is predicted to begin operation about 2025. The Buckman Water Reclamation Facility (WRF) and the Buckman Residuals Management Facility (RMF) are located at 2221 Buckman Street, Jacksonville, Florida, and are centrally located within JEA s service area. The Buckman WRF is JEA s largest wastewater treatment facility, with a permitted annual average daily flow (AADF) treatment capacity of 52.5 million gallons per day (mgd) and an AADF ranging from approximately 32 mgd in 2015 to 29 mgd in 2017. Residuals from the Buckman WRF and several other WRFs are transferred to the Buckman RMF for treatment. Influent wastewater to the Buckman WRF passes through mechanical bar screens before entering an onsite influent pump station. This pump station sends the screened influent to an influent chamber where it combines with influent from offsite lift stations. This combined flow then enters two grit settling basins with three channels per basin. The degritted flow then passes through two mechanical fine screens and onto one of eight primary clarifiers. The primary effluent proceeds to secondary treatment, which is composed of four aeration tanks with fine bubble diffusers operated in series. The combined basin includes anoxic and oxic zones along with recycle pumping for nitrogen removal. The flow then proceeds to one of six secondary clarifiers and then to an ultraviolet (UV) disinfection system. Effluent is discharged to the St. Johns River with a permitted discharge capacity of 52.5 mgd AADF. Sludge from the primary and secondary clarifiers is transferred to the raw holding tank at the Buckman RMF. The biosolids management process at the Buckman RMF begins with primary sludge, waste activated sludge (WAS), and the pumped or trucked residual solids from the JEA WRFs being combined in the raw sludge storage tank, then pumped to the gravity belt thickeners. Output from the gravity belt thickeners is then pumped into three anaerobic digesters. Biogas is harnessed from the digesters and used as fuel Page 1

for energy production. The approximately 3 percent total solids (TS) digested sludge is moved from the digesters to the centrifuges for dewatering where additional polymer is added. The dewatered biosolids, now at approximately 20 percent TS, are conveyed from the centrifuges to a thermal dryer where they reach 95 percent TS. The dried biosolids are stored in silos before being land applied or further processed by the vendor into other fertilizer products. The Buckman RMF has an approximate design capacity of about 35 dry tons per day of solids loading based on the existing condition of equipment. The biosolids dewatering and drying building has reached the end of its useful life and is not considered a viable candidate for rehabilitation because of the extremely high costs involved in rehabilitating the building and bringing up to current design and building code standards. 1.2 New Biosolids Process Facility A new facility will be constructed for thickening, dewatering, and truck loading. The current concept for a new biosolids process facility at Buckman WRF is a three-story structure with thickening and polymer feed processes and two truck loading bays on the first floor. Conveyors would be located on the second level for safe and convenient access for maintenance. The third floor will house operations and dewatering. Existing thickening and dewatering equipment will be relocated to the new biosolids process facility. New biosolids cake storage bins and truck loadout facilities will be used to transfer dewatered cake from the Buckman RMF to the Contractor s trucks for hauling to the Contractor s biosolids processing, reuse, or disposal sites. Viable thickening, dewatering, and conveyance equipment will be relocated from the existing solids process building to the newly constructed facility as needed. Once the new facility is operating, the existing facility will be demolished to alleviate safety concerns and provide available space for future plant upgrades as needed. The Contractor s input will be considered in the design process for the new Buckman Solids Process Building by reviewing the truck loadout facility and providing input on loadout features and traffic flow that will facilitate the Contractor s operations when switching to the new Solids Process Building. A DigestivorePAD (post-aerobic digestion process) is also planned to be added to the Buckman RMF between anaerobic digestion and dewatering. One of the anticipated benefits of this process is the reduction in total solids (TS) produced by approximately 10 percent through further volatile solids reduction. 1.3 Other Facilities Solids from the existing Blacks Ford WRF and Monterey WRF and future Greenland WRF will also be included in the contract for biosolids management services. The Blacks Ford WRF expansion is under construction and when complete will consist of screening, biological treatment in an oxidation ditch in a 5-stage Bardenpho process configuration for biological nitrogen and phosphorus removal, secondary clarifiers, filtration, and UV disinfection. Alum may be added to polish residual phosphorus from the biological process when necessary. Waste activated sludge will be sent to aerobic digestion followed by centrifuge dewatering producing Class B dewatered biosolids. The Greenland WRF is expected to be a similar facility to the Blacks Ford WRF, and is predicted to begin operation about 2025 as noted in Table 2-2. Page 2

2. Scope of Work The work will consist of receiving Class AA thermally dried biosolids, Class B dewatered biosolids, or at times, unclassified solids from the designated truck loading stations at JEA s existing Buckman Solids Process Building while it remains operational until approximately 2020, and then switching the biosolids receiving location to the new Buckman Solids Process Building, where the material received will consist primarily of Class B dewatered biosolids (Project). The work will also consist of receiving primarily Class B dewatered biosolids from JEA s Blacks Ford and Monterey WRFs and future Greenland WRF. The Contractor will transport the biosolids to permitted biosolids processing or land application sites, or to biosolids disposal locations such as landfills. Work areas and scope may include, but not be limited to, the following: 1. Design, construct, operate, and maintain biosolids processing facility (BPF), or biosolids land application, or biosolids disposal facilities at offsite locations either owned or operated by the Contractor with sufficient capacity to process JEA s biosolids, which have projections of mass quantities as shown in Tables 2-1 and 2-2, and general characteristics as described in Table 2-3, for a 10-year contract operating period. 2. Receive dewatered cake biosolids or dried biosolids at designated interface connection points and transport them to the Contractor s BPF(s), land application, or disposal sites throughout the 10-year contract operating period. The location of interface connection points at the Buckman RMF are shown approximately in Figures 2-1 and 2-2 (Process Schematics), Figure 2-3(Existing Site Plan) and Figure 2-4 (Future Site Plan), and will be determined more precisely at the Invitation to Negotiate (ITN) phase. 3. Design facilities for handling any recycle waste streams produced at the Contractor s BPF(s). 4. Design, construct, operate, and maintain all required utilities (water, sewer, electricity, natural gas, biogas) for the BPF(s). 5. Operate and maintain, or produce, biosolids end product(s) that can be marketed or disposed of. 6. Identify, obtain, and maintain all construction and operating permits required by local, state, and national jurisdictions. Permits will include those for site development, utilities, water and air pollution prevention, zoning, and environmental. All permits and licenses required for design and construction will be obtained and paid for by the Contractor. 7. Market the biosolids end product(s) to potential users, or properly handle and dispose of any other biosolids products. 8. Develop an appropriate monitoring, record keeping, and reporting program to accomplish the following: Measure the quantity of materials processed Identify and track where material is used Maintain a record demonstrating the quality of the material produced Record and maintain all regulatory reports Maintain all accounting records, recording costs and revenues generated by the Contractor. Perform all sampling and analyses required for the program; sampling and analyses must be performed in accordance with local, state, and federal regulatory requirements. Page 3

Develop and implement an appropriate asset management and maintenance management program, perform all preventive and corrective maintenance for the new facilities, and perform asset replacement consistent with the asset management program. 9. Perform all work in accordance with the more stringent code or regulation should there be a conflict in applicable regulations. Table 2-1. Solids Production Forecast for the Buckman RMF* Year TS to Buckman RMF ADF Peak 3 Month 1.11 x ADF TS after Digestion 62% x TS to Buckman RMF Peak 3 Month After Digestion 1.11 x TS after Digestion 2018 46.0 51.1 31.3 34.7 2019 46.1 51.1 31.3 34.8 2020 46.1 51.2 31.4 34.8 2021 46.2 51.3 31.4 34.9 2022 46.6 51.7 31.7 35.2 2023 47.0 52.2 32.0 35.5 2024 47.4 52.6 32.2 35.8 2025 47.8 53.0 32.5 36.1 2026 48.3 53.6 32.8 36.4 2027 48.8 54.1 33.2 36.8 2028 49.3 54.7 33.5 37.2 2029 49.8 55.2 33.8 37.6 2030 50.3 55.9 34.2 38.0 2031 50.8 56.4 34.5 38.3 2032 51.3 56.9 34.9 38.7 2033 51.8 57.5 35.2 39.1 2034 52.3 58.0 35.5 39.4 2035 52.7 58.5 35.9 39.8 2036 53.2 59.1 36.2 40.2 *Updated from JEA Biosolids Management Study, CH2M, 2017. Values do not account for anticipated 10% mass reduction in biosolids if post-aerobic digestion (PAD) is implemented as planned at Buckman RMF. Page 4

Table 2-2. Solids Production Forecast for the Blacks Ford and Greenland WRFs Year Blacks Ford WRF TS ADF Greenland WRF TS ADF Monterey WRF TS ADF 2018 2.5 0 0.96 2019 2.7 0 0.99 2020 2.8 0 1.01 2021 3.0 0 1.01 2022 3.2 0 1.02 2023 3.4 0 1.02 2024 3.6 0 1.02 2025 3.7 0.8 1.02 2026 3.2 1.5 1.02 2027 3.4 1.5 1.02 2028 3.5 1.6 1.02 2029 3.7 1.6 1.02 2030 3.4 2.1 1.03 2031 3.6 2.2 1.03 2032 3.7 2.3 1.03 2033 3.8 2.4 1.03 2034 3.9 2.5 1.03 2035 4.1 2.6 1.03 2036 4.2 2.7 1.03 Page 5

Table 2-3. Characteristics of Biosolids Produced at the Buckman RMF Type of Biosolids Total Solids Concentration, % Ratio of volatile solids to total solids (%) Regulatory Standard Met Class AA Dried Pellets Class B Dewatered Cake Unclassified, dewatered cake 88-95% TS 65-75% TS EPA Class A pathogen reduction Vector attraction reduction Pollutant concentrations under EPA Table 3 limits 18-22% TS 60-80% TS EPA Class B pathogen reduction Vector attraction reduction Pollutant concentrations under EPA Table 3 limits 17-22% TS n/a Does not meet Class B pathogen reduction, vector attraction reduction, or pollutant concentration limits, so it must be landfilled or processed further at Contractor s BPF provided it meets pertinent requirements Dewatered Cake Loadout Dried Biosolids Loadout Figure 2-1. Existing Buckman RMF Process Flow Diagram Page 6

Mandarin WRF Nassau Regional WRF JCP WRF Ponte Vedra WRF Hauled Biosolids Ponce De Leon WRF From Sludge Holding Tank Arlington East WRF District II WRF Southwest WRF Pumped Biosolids Raw Sludge Storage Tank Buckman WRF Treatment Facility Centrifuge Feed Pumps Gravity Belt Thickener (GBT) Feed Pumps Centrifuge No. 1 GBT #1 GBT #2 GBT #3 Centrate Pump Station Recirculation Pumps Feed Pumps To Buckman WRF Grit Chamber Centrate Heat Exchangers To Buckman WRF Sidestream Process Centrate Anaerobic No. 3 Anaerobic No. 1 Anaerobic No. 2 To Buckman WRF Headworks Overflow Recirculation Pumps Heat Exchanger Sludge Holding Tank To Digested Sludge Transfer Pumps Post Aerobic Centrifuge No. 2 Digested Sludge Transfer Pumps Centrifuge No. 3 PAD Blower Cake Bin Dewatered Cake Loadout Figure 2-2. Future Buckman RMF Process Flow Diagram Dewatered Cake and Pellet Loadout Location (Existing) Figure 2-3. Buckman RMF Existing Site Plan Concept Page 7

Dewatered Cake Loadout Location (Future) Figure 2-4. Buckman RMF Future Site Plan Concept 3. Technical Qualifications and Capability The Procurement Committee will evaluate each Respondent s technical qualifications and capability in accordance with the following criteria as stated in the Request for Qualifications (RFQ): A. Introduction and Administrative B. Organization and Management C. Technical Experience, Capabilities, and Project Understanding D. Financial Capabilities and Experience The content and format that the Statements of Qualifications are to follow are described in the RFQ. The Procurement Committee will evaluate each Respondent s financial qualifications and capability in accordance with the extent and depth of equity members experience in investing equity and structuring financing sources to obtain firm financing commitments for proposals for, and achieving financial close on, similar projects using a diverse range of financial products (including bank loans, taxable and taxexempt bonds, government credit assistance programs, letters of credit, and other financing sources). The Respondent team should demonstrate their overall financial strength and capability to carry out the Project responsibilities potentially allocated to it, as evidenced by the financial statements of the equity members, lead contractor and lead contractor team members, level of support and financial statements of any guarantor and information contained in the financial officer certificates and surety letter provided in accordance with the requirements of the RFQ. Page 8

4. Other Considerations 4.1 Ineligible Firms The following firms are not eligible to respond to this RFQ, to assist in preparing a Statement of Qualifications (SOQ), or to participate on any Respondent s team: Jacobs Page 9