Presentation Outline

Similar documents
NITROGEN REMOVAL GRANT WEAVER, PE & WWTP OPERATOR PRESIDENT THE WATER PLANET COMPANY. Create Optimal Habitats

Post-Aerobic Digester with Bioaugmentation Pilot Study City of Meridian, ID WWTP PNCWA 2010

Altoona Westerly Wastewater Treatment Facility BNR Conversion with Wet Weather Accommodation

Operation and Control of Multiple BNR Processes in One WWTP

AquaPASS. Aqua MixAir System. Phase Separator. System Features and Advantages. Anaerobic. Staged Aeration. Pre-Anoxic.

OWEA Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition Upgrading WRFs for Biological Nutrient Removal. June 25, 2015

At the Mercy of the Process Impacts of Nitrogen Removal Performance on WWTP Disinfection

ENHANCING THE PERFORMANCE OF OXIDATION DITCHES. Larry W. Moore, Ph.D., P.E., DEE Professor of Environmental Engineering The University of Memphis

Secondary Treatment Process Control

General Operational Considerations in Nutrient and Wet Weather Flow Management for Wastewater Treatment Facilities Part II

James Winslade Instructor, Environmental Resources Training Center Southern Illinois University-Edwardsville

SIMPLE and FLEXIBLE ENERGY SAVINGS And PERFORMANCE ENHANCEMENT for OXIDATION DITCH UPGRADES

Nutrient Removal Optimization at the Fairview WWTP

RE ENGINEERING O&M PRACTICES TO GET NITROGEN & PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL WITHOUT FACILITY UPGRADES

20 Years of Nutrient Removal City of Beloit

A Battle to Be the Best: A Comparison of Two Powerful Sidestream Treatment Technologies: Post Aerobic Digestion and Anammox

Andrea Nifong, World Water Works (formerly HRSD) Stephanie Klaus, VT & HRSD

AMPC Wastewater Management Fact Sheet Series Page 1

AMPC Wastewater Management Fact Sheet Series Page 1

Preparing for Nutrient Removal at Your Treatment Plant

Contents General Information Abbreviations and Acronyms Chapter 1 Wastewater Treatment and the Development of Activated Sludge

Biological Phosphorus Removal Technology. Presented by: Eugene Laschinger, P.E.

NUTRIENT REMOVAL PROCESSES IN WASTEWATER TREATMENT. We re Glad You re Here!

A Novel Testing Approach for BNR Optimization in NYC. Vera Gouchev, P.E. January 23, 2017 NEWEA 2017 Annual Conference

Wet Weather and Advanced Treatment: Procurement Strategies to Secure the Right Technology

PLANNING FOR NUTRIENT REMOVAL: WHAT STEPS CAN WE BE TAKING NOW?

2015 Spring Conference

TWO YEARS OF BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL WITH AN ADVANCED MSBR SYSTEM AT THE SHENZHEN YANTIAN WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

Advances in Nitrogen and Phosphorus Removal at Low DO Conditions

Shortcut Biological Nitrogen Removal for sustainable wastewater treatment and achieving energy neutrality

BEING GOOD STEWARDS: IMPROVING EFFLUENT QUALITY ON A BARRIER ISLAND. 1.0 Executive Summary

Masses at Massillon: IFAS for Industrial Loads and Nutrient Removal

WWTP Side Stream Treatment of Nutrients Considerations for City of Raleigh s Bioenergy Recovery Project. Erika L. Bailey, PE, City of Raleigh

Simultaneous Nutrient Removal: Quantification, Design, and Operation. Leon Downing, Ph.D., PE Donohue & Associates

COMPARISON OF SBR AND CONTINUOUS FLOW ACTIVATED SLUDGE FOR NUTRIENT REMOVAL

Performance Evaluation of the Moores Creek Advanced Water Resource Recovery Facility

WASTEWATER FROM CARBON CAPTURE SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR WASTEWATER TREATMENT

Energy Savings Through Denitrification

An Innovative Approach to Retrofitting for Nitrogen Removal

Biological Nutrient Removal Operations. December 9 th, 2015 Presenter Georgine Grissop PE, BCEE

Use of Biowin for Process Troubleshooting / Design for a Unique Wastewater

Increasing Denitrification in Sequencing Batch Reactors with Continuous Influent Feed

THE DEMON ANAMMOX PROCESS: RESOURCE SAVINGS THROUGH SIDE STREAM TREATMENT, AND THE STEPS TOWARDS AN ENERGY NEUTRAL WWTP PRESENTED AT: NC AWWA-WEA 97

Activated Sludge Process Control: Nitrification

SECTION 8.0 NEWPCC SECOND PRIORITY CONTROL ALTERNATIVES

Meeting SB1 Requirements and TP Removal Fundamentals

Optimizing Nutrient Removal. PNCWA - Southeast Idaho Operators Section Pocatello, ID February 11, 2016 Jim Goodley, P.E.

ENVE 302 Environmental Engineering Unit Processes DENITRIFICATION

Appendix D JWPCP Background and NDN

Making Your Plant Denitrify

Design, Construction and Startup of the First Enhanced Nutrient Removal Plant in Maryland Funded by the Chesapeake Bay Restoration Fund

Nutrient Removal Processes MARK GEHRING TECHNICAL SALES MGR., BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT

Ditches for Energy Efficiency and Improved Nitrogen Removal

Process Monitoring for Biological and Chemical Nutrient Removal

Technical Memorandum-Low Cost Retrofits for Nitrogen Removal at Wastewater Treatment Plants in the Upper Long Island Sound Watershed

CITY OF OXFORD WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR OF 2018

Aqua MSBR MODIFIED SEQUENCING BATCH REACTOR

Dipankar Sen, PhD, PE Santa Clara Valley Water District Professor, Virginia Tech Civil & Env Engr

American Water College 2010

General Information on Nitrogen

Module 17: The Activated Sludge Process - Part III Answer Key

Wastewater Tools: Activated Sludge and Energy Use Analysis

ISAM SBR with Blower Assisted Jet Aeration Design Calculations For Lyons, CO WWTP Upgrade

PILOT SCALE TESTS OF A UNIQUE APPROACH FOR BNR UPGRADE OF A SHORT SRT HIGH PURITY OXYGEN SYSTEM AT PIMA COUNTY, AZ

BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHOROUS REMOVAL AN OPERATOR S GUIDE

By Jack Wendler/Ripon WWTF

CITY OF OXFORD WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR OF 2014

operation of continuous and batch reactors. Contrary to what happens in the batch reactor, the substrate (BOD) of the wastewater in the continuous rea

Short-Cut Nitrogen Removal: A State of the Art Review

Sidestream Treatment Overview. Kam Law, P.E. Beverley Stinson, Ph.D.

- 1 - Retrofitting IFAS Systems In Existing Activated Sludge Plants. by Glenn Thesing

2015 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved.

Biological Nutrient Removal Processes

OCTOBER 31, NAMI Environmental Conference BEST PRACTICES: IMPROVING WW SYSTEMS

CSR Process Simulations Can Help Municipalities Meet Stringent Nutrient Removal Requirements

Presenters: Rodrigo Pena-Lang, PE (D&B Engineers), Magdalena Gasior, PE (D&B Engineers) and Paul D. Smith, PE (NYCDEP)

BIOLOGICAL WASTEWATER BASICS

WASTEWATER DEPARTMENT. Bentonville Wastewater Treatment Plant Facts:

ANOXIC BIOREACTOR SIZING

OPTIMIZATION STUDY OF THE ST. MARY'S WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

Technical Survey of Nitrogen Removal Alternatives for the Deer Island Treatment Plant

Troubleshooting Activated Sludge Processes. PNCWA - Southeast Idaho Operators Section Pocatello, ID February 11, 2016 Jim Goodley, P.E.

Bloomingdale WWTF Private/Public Partnership Works. Bob Wilcox, PE Fleis & VandenBrink May 10, 2016

The Development of Operational Tools for City-Wide Implementation of BNR in New York City. Sarah Galst, P.E. Hazen and Sawyer, P.C.

THE SEQUENCED AERATION PROCESS MONTAGUE, MASSACHUSETTS

North Side WRP Master Plan Research and Development Department 2006 Seminar Series October 27, 2006 Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of

ETHANOL DOSING OPTIMISATION IN BIOREACTOR. Blake Schneider. Blake Schneider, Duty Operator, Thakshila Balasuriya, Process Engineer, City of Gold Coast

Using Process Optimization and Energy Audits to Reduce Energy Costs

We Know Water. AnoxKaldnes. Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor (MBBR) Integrated Fixed-Film Activated Sludge (IFAS) and ANITA Mox Deammonification

Nutrient Removal Enhancement Using Process Automation at Holly Hill

COLD WEATHER NITRIFICATION OF LAGOON EFFLUENT USING A MOVING BED BIOFILM REACTOR (MBBR) TREATMENT PROCESS

The following biological nutrient removal processes were evaluated in detail in the 2016 Liquid Processing Facilities Plan:

Side Stream Nutrient Considera6ons and Nutrient Harves6ng

MBBR Technology: - A cost effective solution for upgrading existing Waste water Treatment Works. Bruno Bigot

Bioprocess Intelligent Operating System -Beyond Ammonia Control-

INTRODUCTION TO NUTRIENT CONTROL FOR SMALL COMMUNITIES NUTRIENTS 101

Aeration University Advanced Concepts in Energy Efficiency

Removal of High C and N Contents in Synthetic Wastewater Using Internal Circulation of Anaerobic and Anoxic/Oxic Activated Sludge Processes

Efficient Design Configurations for Biological Nutrient Removal

Transcription:

Presentation Outline Nitrification/denitrification refresher Treatment technologies available for nitrification and BNR/ENR What is the problem? BNR/ENR VPDES permitting Causes of reduced BNR performance during winter Cold wet weather strategies Case Studies Kearney, NE; Christiansburg, Abingdon Advances in process control

Nutrient Removal - Nitrification Nitrifying bacteria (AOB and NOB) use alkalinity for cell growth (autotrophic); do not remove BOD; and utilize CO 2 from air Temperature sensitive Require excess DO Consumes 7.1 mg/l of Alkalinity per mg/l of NH 3 -N

Nutrient Removal - Denitrification Denitrifying bacteria remove BOD but use NO 3 instead of O 2 Denitrification requires anoxic conditions.. NO 3 but no O 2 Recover 3.6 mg/l of Alkalinity per mg/l of NO 3 -N

Nitrification Factors - Mean Cell Residence Time (MCRT) MCRT actual = MLVSS Volume of Aeration Tank Q EFF X EFF +Q WAS X WAS Need to maintain minimum MCRT for healthy nitrifying population MCRT min = 1 µ maxn bn If actual MCRT > minimum MCRT then complete nitrification can occur MCRT is temperature dependent: 10-14 C MCRT min of 12-16 days 16-20 C MCRT min of 6-10 days Reference: Metcalf and Eddy s Wastewater Engineering: Treatment, Disposal, and Reuse 5 th edition, 2014.

Nitrification Factors - Temperature Optimum temperature for nitrification is 77 to 95 o F Growth rate decreases by 50% at 64 o F Growth rate decreases by 75% at 46 to 50 o F No activity at 39 o F Ammonia (mg/l) Minimum MCRT Design MCRT MCRT (days)

Treatment Technologies Trickling Filters and RBCs (BOD and NH 3 ) Activated Sludge (BOD, NH 3, and BNR) MLE e-mle Bardenpho Vendor Activated Sludge (BOD, NH 3, and BNR) No Primaries Sequencing Batch Reactor Oxidation Ditch Aeromod Sequox D-ditch Counter Current Aeration (Schreiber) Modified Activated Sludge (BOD, NH 3, and BNR) Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor Integrated Fixed Film Membrane Bioreactor Hybrids (BOD, NH 3, and BNR) Biological Aerated Filters Filters (nitrifying and denitrifying)

What is the Problem? Nitrification and BNR are significantly impacted by cold wastewater temperatures Cold Wet Weather Events (CWWE) The problem is compounded in the northeast and mid-atlantic during winter months because 40+ inches of annual precipitation Wet weather events produce peak day flows that are 5-10 Q These flows are likely due to inflow of snow melt, cold rain inflow, and/or river inflow In Virginia, we have seen influent WW temperatures as low as 39 o F

VPDES Permitting Nutrient limits (TN & TP) in Virginia are based upon annual concentration and loading (saving grace) NH3 or TKN limits are weekly maximum and monthly average When in doubt: maintain aeration and maintain solids inventory (avoid washout) After the CWWE, return basins to established SOP and BNR will quickly return

VPDES Permitting

Primary Causes of Reduced BNR Performance During CWWE Solids inventory management Reduced influent BOD Reduced hydraulic retention time Elevated influent dissolved oxygen Lack of side stream nutrient management TN and TP effluent concentrations are low due to dilution

Cold Wet Weather Strategies Focus collection system on identification and correction of inflow sources Make sure that all tanks, clarifiers, and filters are in service If you have equalization, plan for it to be empty in advance of CWWE Equalize nutrient-laden sidestreams Provide more biomass in winter; minimize wasting if you can Minimize sludge blankets in clarifier Increase aerobic HRT anoxic/aerobic swing zones go aerobic Be prepared to add metal salt for P removal Enhanced process control - consider installing ion specific electrode to monitor nitrogen In Virginia, BNR during CWWE is not as important; maintain biomass and nitrification - TN removal will recover quickly after CWWE

City of Kearney TF/SC WWTP Headworks Primary Clarifiers Dewatering Activated Sludge Trickling Filters Secondary Clarifiers Disinfection

City of Kearney WWTP

City of Kearney BioWin Data Influent: Average Daily Flow 3.5 MGD Current Design Flow = 4.8 MGD Future Design Flow = 5.8 MGD Total cbod = 220 mg/l TSS = 237 mg/l Ammonia = 24.7 mg/l Nebraska Winter: Routine air temperatures less than 0 o F Trickling Filter WW temperature greater than 11 o F

City of Kearney BioWin Data Current Performance: Average Daily Flow 3.5 MGD Winter NH 3 Performance less than 1 mg/l-n Future NH 3 Limit 1.2 mg/l at 5.9 MGD Steady State BioWin Model Results Season Summer Winter Summer Winter Flow (mgd) 4.8 4.8 5.9 5.9 Total cbod (mg/l) 2.32 2.89 2.90 4.74 TSS (mg/l) 5.70 6.31 6.27 7.58 Ammonia (mg/l) 0.19 1.10 0.27 4.21 Total Nitrogen (mg/l) 13.93 14.83 12.05 16.73

Town of Christiansburg WWTP Effluent PS Disinfection Dewatering Secondary Clarifiers Anaerobic Digestion Primary Clarifiers Headworks Influent EQ Activated Sludge

History and Design Expansion to 4 MGD completed in 2000 For future growth Due to CWWE NH 3 Violations Rerated WWTP to 6 MGD in 2008 ADF 2.5 MGD; PDF 10+ MGD Plug Flow Activated Sludge configured for 5-stage process in future High influent Nitrogen: TKN of 40 mg/l NH 3 of 30 mg/l Converted to MLE over 2014 and 2015 Primarily to recover alkalinity and avoid the use of lime Anoxic selector to enhance floc-forming bacteria and improved settling TN has averaged: 10 mg/l in summer 11 mg/l in winter

Town of Christiansburg WWTP

Strategies at Christiansburg Make sure that all tanks, clarifiers, and filters are in service Equalization (2.6 MG) Equalize nutrient-laden sidestreams (not planned) Minimize sludge blankets in clarifier Maintain aeration in aerobic zones

Influent: Town of Christiansburg BioWin Data Flow = 2.5 MGD Total cbod = 204 mg/l TSS = 255 mg/l Ammonia = 30 mg/l-n BioWin Simulation Example of GBT slug loading Anaerobically digested sludge campaign thickened 1 to 2 times per week. Can double the NH 3 in one day

Town of Christiansburg BioWin Data Steady State BioWin Model Results Season Summer Winter Winter Winter Temperature (⁰C) 20.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 Filtrate Storage No No* Yes* Yes MLVSS (mg/l) 1,600 1,600 1,600 2,400 Recycle Rate (%) 400% 400% 400% 400% Flow (mgd) 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 Total cbod (mg/l) 1.75 2.45 2.45 1.73 TSS (mg/l) 7.52 7.17 7.17 7.17 Ammonia (mg/l) 0.34 4.97* 4.97* 2.30 Total Nitrogen (mg/l) 11.2 13.2 13.2 12.2 * Steady State BioWin Modeling Based Average Conditions. See Time Series Charts For Plant Reaction To Campaign Thickening.

Town of Christiansburg BioWin PFD Screened Influent Recycle Pump 1-Anoxic 2-Aerobic 3A-Aerobic 3B-Aerobic 4-Aerobic 5-Anoxic Primary Clarifier Secondary Clarifier Effluent RAS Pump PS Pump Sludge Gravity Belt Thickener Anaerobic Digester WAS Pump

Effluent Nitrogen Winter 10⁰C, 1600 MLVSS, No Filtrate Storage CONC (mgn/l) 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Effluent Total N Effluent Ammonia N Effluent Nitrite + Nitrate

Christiansburg BioWin PFD With Filtrate Storage Screened Influent Recycle Pump 1-Anoxic 2-Aerobic 3A-Aerobic 3B-Aerobic 4-Aerobic 5-Anoxic Primary Clarifier Secondary Clarifier Effluent RAS Pump PS Pump Sludge Filtrate Storage Gravity Belt Thickener Anaerobic Digester WAS Pump

Effluent Nitrogen Winter 10⁰C, 1600 MLVSS, With Filtrate Storage CONC (mgn/l) 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Effluent Total N Effluent Ammonia N Effluent Nitrite + Nitrate

Effluent Nitrogen Winter 10⁰C, 2400 MLVSS, With Filtrate Storage CONC (mgn/l) 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Effluent Total N Effluent Ammonia N Effluent Nitrite + Nitrate

Town of Abingdon WCWRF Headworks Dewatering Activated Sludge Influent EQ Primary Clarifiers Disinfection Secondary Clarifiers Anaerobic Digestion

Town of Abingdon WCWRF History and Design Expansion from 2.75 MGD to 4.95 MGD in 2007 For future growth Wet weather treatment Ammonia limit due to discharge to Wolf Creek Provide treatment above and beyond VPDES requirements Existing CMAS converted to MLE Anoxic selector to enhance settling TN removal without expanding tank volume Cloth media filtration Converted secondary clarifier to sidestream storage

Town of Abingdon WWTP

Town of Abingdon BioWin PFD Screened Influent Recycle Pump Primary Clarifier 1-Anoxic 2-Aerobic 3-Aerobic 4-Aerobic Secondary Clarifier Effluent RAS Pump PS Pump Sludge Thickener WAS Pump Centrate Storage Centrifuge Anaerobic Digester NH4 Correction

Strategies at Town of Abingdon s WCWRF Equalization (1.6 MG) Equalize nutrient-laden sidestreams (conversion of abandon secondary clarifier) Minimize sludge blankets in clarifier Maintain aeration in aerobic zones Cloth media filter provides limited protection from washout

Case Study Improved Process and Control CHA SBR Pilot Study for high TKN waste stream AERATE and MIX controlled by ion selective sensor NH 4 +/NO 3 - Continuous DO and ORP monitoring

Case Study Improved Process and Control AERATE ANOXIC MIX

Aeration Basin Control Ammonia Based Aeration Control (ABAC) 1. Ammonia feedback control 2. Cascade DO Control NH4 1.5 mg/l then DO = 0.5 mg/l NH4 1.5 mg/l then DO = 2.0 mg/l VFD DO PLC NH4 Nitrate Nitrogen NH 4 Nitrite Nitrate Anoxic Oxic

In Conclusion Focus on maintaining nitrification Focus on maintaining solids inventory Prepare for the next CWWE by: Utilizing all tanks Managing high nutrient return sidestreams Empty equalization storage After the CWWE: Provide environmental conditions for BNR, and it will recover quickly

Acknowledgements Ryan Hendrix Town of Christiansburg Sarita Moore Town of Abingdon Charles Bott, PhD, PE HRSD Stephanie Klaus, PE - HRSD

Questions and Comments