Increasing Fertilizer Efficiency. Dr. Dave Franzen NDSU Extension Soil Specialist

Similar documents
Plant Nutrient Management. Dave Franzen PhD North Dakota State University Extension Soil Specialist

How to Squeeze the Most out of Your Fertilizer $ Dave Franzen, PhD Professor Soil Science NDSU Extension Soil Specialist Fargo, ND

Nitrogen Calibration for Corn. Dave Franzen, Ph.D. NDSU Extension Soil Specialist

Best Management Practices for Nitrogen Use in SOUTHWESTERN AND WEST-CENTRAL MINNESOTA

NDSU Soil Fertility Recommendation Updates A to Z

Split N Application for Corn and Wheat: Where, When, How and What to Expect

SOIL NITRATE TESTS FOR WISCONSIN CROPPING SYSTEMS. L.G. Bundy Dept. of Soil Science University of Wisconsin

Where do Pulse Crops Fit into Soil Health? The Role of Pulse Crops in Improving Soil Health

Getting the most out of your N fertilizer $ Prepared for 2013 Montana/Wyoming Barley and Sugarbeet Symposium

Nitrogen Fertilization for Corn

Optimizing Fertilizer Applications on Sugar Beet. Jay Norton Soil Fertility Specialist University of Wyoming

Split Application- North Dakota Perspective. Dave Franzen, PhD Professor Soil Science Extension Soil Specialist, NDSU, Fargo

Fertility requirements for peas and alternative crops. Rich Koenig, Extension Soil Fertility Specialist

Cover Crops, Crop Nutrition. Dave Franzen NDSU Extension Soil Specialist

End of Yield-Based Fertilizer Recommendations. Dave Franzen, PhD Professor Soil Science NDSU Extension Soil Specialist Fargo, ND

For Agronomic Crops. Fertilizer Recommendations. In Minnesota. George Rehm and Michael Schmitt . AG-MI MN 2500 AGMI (U.

Getting the Most out of Your Nitrogen Fertilization in Corn Brent Bean 1 and Mark McFarland 2

SF723 (Revised) Barley

Cover Crops, Crop Nutrition. Dave Franzen NDSU Extension Soil Specialist

MANAGING FERTILITY FOR PROTEIN IN SMALL GRAINS

North Dakota Fertilizer Recommendation Tables and Equations

Central Region Ag Agent Update Choteau, April 4, 2017

Fertilizing Corn in Minnesota

ENHANCED NITROGEN FOR HARD WHEAT YIELD AND PROTEIN Brad Brown University of Idaho, Parma R & E Center

Manure Management Facts Managing Manure within Tillage Systems and Crop Rotations

Overview of the Principles of Nitrogen Management and Sources on Crop Production. Dave Franzen, Ph.D. NDSU Extension Soil Specialist

Prepared for Glacier and Liberty Counties: February 28, 2007

HOW CAN WE REDUCE VOLATILIZATION LOSSES? Larry G. Bundy Department of Soil Science University of Wisconsin

Cost-Effective N Management Using Reduced Rates of Polymer Coated Urea in Corn

Preview of Summer 2014 Revision of Corn N Recommendations. Dave Franzen, PhD Extension Soil Specialist North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND

Effects of Cropping Systems on Nitrogen and Phosphorus Availability. Agronomy Workshop 2009, Baker

Ontario Corn Nitrogen Soil N Survey 2015

Fertilizer Placement Options Demonstration

Optimizing Fertilizer Applications on Big Horn Basin Crops

Preview of Summer 2014 Revision of Corn N Recommendations and N Issues

Common and Not So Common Fertility Issues in the Region for Soybean and Wheat

Nitrogen Management on Sandy Soils: Review of BMPs. Carl Rosen Department of Soil Water and Climate University of Minnesota

Fine-tune Nitrogen Management Using 4R Stewardship

Management School. by Clain Jones, Extension Soil Fertility Specialist

NITROGEN MANAGEMENT USING REDUCED RATES OF POLYMER COATED UREA IN CORN

SULFUR AND NITROGEN FOR PROTEIN BUILDING

Pulse Crop Fertilizer Needs July 11, 2013 NE MT Pulse Crop Tour, Richland

GETTING THE MOST FROM N AND P APPLICATIONS ON PROCESSING CROPS. Larry G. Bundy Dept. of Soil Science Univ. of Wisconsin

Irrigated Spring Wheat

OM 2 OM Processes 2 N Processes 3Sinks 4 losses 5 additions

Nitrogen input decisions with tight crop production margins

Best Management Practices for Nitrogen Use in SOUTH-CENTRAL MINNESOTA

Sidedress. trogen Uptake. Seasonal Nit. 80% of requirement after V8-10

Fertilizing Corn in Minnesota

Nitrogen Fertilizer Use Efficiency and Fertilizer Economics Cabin Fever January 6, 2009

Cost-Effective N Management Using Reduced Rates of Polymer Coated Urea in Corn

Corn Tillage and Plant Nutrition Research, NDSU Carrington Research Extension Center

VARIABLE RATE NITROGEN MANAGEMENT. Larry G. Bundy Dept. of Soil Science University of Wisconsin

BEST PRACTICES FOR MANAGING NITROGEN IN NO-TILL

Nutrient Management of Forages and Legumes Crop Pest Management School Bozeman, January 6, 2010

Inoculants and Nutrient Management of Pulses May 25, 2017 Ag Agent Update, Havre

The Enigma of Soil Nitrogen George Rehm, University of Minnesota

Fertilizer Management Considerations for Carrie Laboski, Dept. of Soil Science, UW-Madison

November 2008 Issue # Nutrient Management Considerations in a High-Cost Environment

Cover Crops for Montana KENT A MCVAY

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT FOR MALT BARLEY AND FALL CEREALS

Cover Crops at Dakota Lakes

Evaluation of ESN Fertilizer in Southcentral Montana

FERTILIZING CANOLA and MUSTARD

Nutrient Management of Pulses and Fertilization during and after Drought January 8-11, 2018

Nitrogen Management in Wheat

Fertility Requirements and Contributions of Pulse Crops. Jeff Schoenau PAg Dept of Soil Science

Fertilizer Management in No- Tillage Cucurbits

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT. philosophy/approach for determining N rate guidelines for corn.

Protecting Your Water and Air Resources

Results from On-farm N Rate Response Trials. Larry G. Bundy Dept. of Soil Science University of Wisconsin

FERTILITY RECOMMENDATIONS

FERTILIZER SOURCES Extension Agent Agronomy College September 24, 2014

Enhanced Efficiency Fertilizers

Challenges of Soil Nutrient Management

Nitrogen Transformation Inhibitors and Controlled Release Urea

CROP ROTATIONS TO COMPLEMENT WINTER WHEAT

Number 209 September 11, 2009

Seed Banding Fertilizer What are the Limits?

Timing of Foliar Applications

Use of the Late-Spring Soil Nitrate Test

Proceedings of the 4th Annual Nitrogen: Minnesota s Grand Challenge & Compelling Opportunity Conference

Clain Jones

Nitrogen management in annual vegetable crops

DOES IT PAY TO FERTILIZE CORN WITH NITROGEN? 1

Nitrogen Management in Strawberries

Nitrogen Management Impacts on Wheat Yield and Protein

Guidelines for Safe Rates of Fertilizer Placed with the Seed

Placement and Timing of Fertilizer Application for Greater Efficiency. Dave Franzen, PhD Professor of Soil Science NDSU Extension Soil Specialist

Fall Strip Tillage and Fertilizer Placement

Corn: Nitrogen Applications

Grain Sorghum Fertility Management Lucas Haag Ph.D., Asst. Professor/Northwest Area Agronomist K-State Northwest Research-Extension Center, Colby

Corn Fertility. Peter Scharf University of Missouri 2018 Regional Corn Meeting Sikeston, December 12

SOIL TEST N FOR PREDICTING ONION N REQUIREMENTS - AN IDAHO PERSPECTIVE. Brad Brown, University of Idaho Parma Research and Extension Center

Soil Fertility Update

Pulse Crop Inoculation and Fertilization January 13, 2017 Hill County Extension Pulse Workshop

Precision Nitrogen Management of Corn

Cover Crop Contributions to Nitrogen Fertility

Transcription:

Increasing Fertilizer Efficiency Dr. Dave Franzen NDSU Extension Soil Specialist

Nitrogen prices are high- 35-55 cents/lb N.

Gas prices have been hovering around $8/MMBTU all year.

More and more of our N supply (about 50%) is imported.

The infrastructure of pressurized ships, port facilities, pipelines and rail is not great enough to handle the increased need. There is little incentive to domestic manufacturers to make imports easier to obtain.

Urea is also being imported in record quantities, but the distribution network is operated by companies involved with manufacture. There is little incentive to cut deals, and the result is charging what the market will bear.

In addition, the ITC has ruled that the tariffs on Russian and eastern bloc urea into the US stay in place for another 5 years, meaning that a large source of cheaper product is not available for reasonable shipment into the US. Recently, the ruling has come up again, but with Russia/US relations on the chill again, the outcome is doubtful, unless an olive branch is needed.

Corn is the number 1 user of N in the US. Last year s 15% rise in corn acreage caused a major scrambling for product and a substantial price jump.

This year, acreage is expected to remain high. Relatively high corn yield in the central corn belt and relatively high corn prices will keep N rates high despite the costs and despite University research that suggests backing off rates would be economically prudent.

Management Strategies- Use of soil testing to identify residual N.

Management Strategies- Use of soil testing to identify residual N. Sampling by zone will result in more confidence in the number. Tools that we found to be helpful in zone delineation weretopography, yield frequency maps, soil EC, aerial/satellite imagery

Dividing data sets into classes that make 3-5 zones greatly improves understanding of residual N patterns and provides opportunities for management. NEW ZONES USING REGRESSION WEIGHTS -97.90788-97.90487 46.8745-97.90917-97.90616 46.874-97.90874-97.90745-97.90573 720 46.8735-97.90831-97.90702-97.9053 620 46.873-97.90959-97.90659 46.8725-97.90917-97.90788-97.90616-97.90487 520 46.872-97.90745 420-97.90874-97.90573 46.8715-97.90702-97.9095-97.909-97.9085-97.908-97.9075-97.907-97.9065-97.906-97.9055-97.905 320

Management Strategies- Alternative crops -Crops that require no N -Crops that require reduced N rates

Crops that require no N Most legumes- -Peas -Lentils -Alfalfa -Soybean

From these data, maximum N rate regardless of yield potential should be about 50 lb/acre for inoculated dry beans and 75 lb/acre for non-inoculated dry beans. $400.00 Return to N, inoculated and non-inoculated trials Inoculated in yellow, non-inoculated in purple $350.00 RetN0 $300.00 Return to N $250.00 $200.00 $150.00 Ret N Inoculated RetN RetN $100.00 $50.00 $0.00 0 50 100 150 200 250 N rate, lb/a

Crops that require less N than wheat/corn- Flax- N recs are capped at 80 lb N. Barley- N rates should be conservative. Rates in the west lower than east. Canola- New recs cap maximum N at 150 lb. Less in the west. Sunflowers- Rooting depth can scavenge unaccounted for deep N.

Sugarbeet N rates are well-defined. Some local heavy clay areas may need a little more N, but not much more. In most areas, following the recs will result in successful production.

Take advantage of N credits from previous crops and conditions- Legumes- -Annual legumes- 40 lb N/acre -Sugarbeet leaves- 0-80 lb N/acre -Volunteer grains present when fields were sampled- 20% to 50% of N contained in the growing cover.

N application methods- Urea application- Avoid application on the surface in no-till fields. Ammonia volatilization is a problem. Losses can be high.

N application methods- Urea application- In conventionally-tilled fields, till into the soil within 48 hours generally unless it is so dry that granules remain intact. It takes at least ½ inch of rain to incorporate urea.

Addition of Agrotain will add about 10 days to the safety of surface-applied urea. It really works. Lots of studies support its use. ESN studies have shown that the product needs to be handled gently. In non-irrigated soils, results have been inconsistent.

We have worked with a Georgia-Pacific product for several years. In dry years, the urea or liquid behaves similar to urea or 28%. In wet springs after application on sandy soils, it has an advantage over urea or 28%. This season, 30 lbs acted like 60 urea. 60 lbs acted like 90 urea.

N application methods- Ammonia- Application at least 4-inches deep is considered 100% efficient. I consider 2-3 inch deep application 90% efficient.

N application methods- Timing- In some years, there is little difference between fall and spring application. In some years, there may be as much as 20% difference. Canadian recommendations consider fall about 90% efficient.

Should N rates be the same regardless of the price of N and the crop? Probably not.

Current corn recommendations do not consider either crop price or N price. N rate = YG X 1.2 less credits Yld N rate

Relative yield vs N rate Oakes 1990-1995 1.2 1 Relative yield 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 y = -0.000016x 2 + 0.007031x + 0.247357 R 2 = 0.772492 0 100 200 300 N rate, lb/a NY Poly. (NY)

What several state are doing now is calculating the Return to N based on their data base, cost of N and price of commodity.

Return to N with N rate, corn at $2.50 $ Return to N $350.00 $300.00 $250.00 $200.00 $150.00 $100.00 $50.00 $0.00 1 32 63 94 125 182 156 187 218 204 249 15 cent N 20 cent N 25 cent N 30 cent N 35 cent N 40 cent N N rate, lb/a

Given the high price of N and low price for corn, this is what I would consider- In the east,- No higher than 180 lb N ± 20 lb. Take credits against that number. Out west- No higher than 120 lb N " 20 lb. But no lower than 100 lb N.

In irrigated sands, 50-60 lb N preplant 50-100 lb sidedress tissue test to determine in-season N through the pivot.

How About Wheat??? The formula does not contain a contemporary economic component. -no allowance for soil mineralization differences -no allowance for agri-climatology differences 120 100 Wheat Yield Potential 80 60 40 20 0 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 N-rate + Credits

N-rate includes 2-ft nitrate-n and any previous crop credit estimate.

Protein in ND is an economic quality component. Below 14%, elevators subtract a dock. From 14 to about 15% elevators provide a $ premium. Above 15%, no additional premium.

There has been consistent success with post-anthesis application of N for protein enhancement.

56 Yield, Minot, 1995 Spring Wheat with N Supplemented from 1/2 flower to post anthesis Yellow horizontal lines indicate LSD 5% above or below check Yield, bu/a 54 52 50 48 46 44 42 CK 28-H H-CoRon H 28 H28split FolicrCoR Folicr28sp 40 CK 28-H H-CoRon H 28 H28split FolicrCoR Folicr28sp Treatment 28-H = 28% with Headline, H-CoRon = Headline with CoRon, H 28 = 28% alone at heading, H28split = Headline and 28% put on separately, FolicrCoR = Folicur and CoRon applied together; Folicr28sp = Folicur and 28% applied separately.

Protein with N Supplemented at or near Heading, Minot, 2005 16.2 16 Protein, % 15.8 15.6 15.4 15.2 CK 28-H H-CoRon H 28 H28split FolicrCoR Folicr28sp 15 14.8 CK 28-H H-CoRon H 28 H28split FolicrCoR Folicr28sp Treatment 28-H = 28% with Headline, H-CoRon = Headline with CoRon, H 28 = 28% alone at heading, H28split = Headline and 28% put on separately, FolicrCoR = Folicur and CoRon applied together; Folicr28sp = Folicur and 28% applied separately.

2007 research on UAP NPact With 2 gal/a rate at 5-6 leaf stage, no increase in yield or quality or spring wheat. Flag leaf-n was not increased by 2 gal/a rate.

Phosphate efficiency? Band application- can decrease recommended P rates (or K) by 1/3. Deep bands should be followed by small starter applications for corn at planting.

QUESTIONS?