This page intentionally left blank

Similar documents
Appendix 10-A. Optional Recharge Volume Approach

Stormwater Analysis Report

REFERENCE MAPS FEMA FIRM MAP NRCS SOILS MAP

Watershed Delineation Techniques

Chapter 2: Conditions in the Spring Lake Watershed related to Stormwater Pollution

Module 3: Rainfall and Hydrology for Construction Site Erosion Control

Hydrologic Soil Group Knowledge Matrix

Ponds: planning, design, and construction

Deep River-Portage Burns Waterway Watershed 2015

Computation of excess stormflow at the basin scale. Prof. Pierluigi Claps. Dept. DIATI, Politecnico di Torino

Water Resources Management Plan

SAMPLE DRAINAGE STATEMENT

Environment, Energy, Security & Sustainability (E2S2)

Ponds Planning, Design, Construction

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT FOR THE BORGATA OUTDOOR EVENT AREA POOL ADDITION

Site Description. CCR Rule Initial Inflow Design Flood Control System Plan (cont.) 2

Mapping and Understanding YOUR LAKE S WATERSHED By: Tony Groves, Pam Tyning, and Tory Meyers Water Resources Group, Progressive AE

WinTR-55 Small Watershed Hydrology

SFPUC Wastewater Enterprise URBAN WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

SFPUC Wastewater Enterprise URBAN WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

Names: ESS 315. Lab #6, Floods and Runoff Part I Flood frequency

Drainage Letter for Falcon High School Building Expansion

Concurrent Session B: LID Design Specifications (Chapter 4 in Draft Manual)

Hydrology for Drainage Design. Design Considerations Use appropriate design tools for the job at hand:

Design of Stormwater Wetlands

McColl Fence Addition GEOTECHNICAL ASSESSMENT

APPENDIX A: STORMWATER HYDROLOGY

RUNOFF CALCULATIONS RATIONAL METHOD. To estimate the magnitude of a flood peak the following alternative methods are available:

Permeable Pavement: A New Chapter

How & Where does infiltration work? Context: Summary of Geologic History Constraints/benefits for different geologic units

Stormwater Management Impacts Resulting from the Volumetric Abstraction of Runoff from Frequent Storms per PADEP CG-1. Geoffrey A. Cerrelli 1, P.E.

Effect of Land Surface on Runoff Generation

Rational Method Hydrological Calculations with Excel COURSE CONTENT

June 2017 C.3 Workshop Sizing Example. Section II.B Sizing Volume-Based Treatment Measures based on the Adapted CASQA Stormwater BMP Handbook Approach

Modeling Infiltration BMPs

Appendix I OFFICE OF THE MORGAN COUNTY SURVEYOR STORMWATER DESIGN MANUAL 7/1/2008

Standards for Soil Erosion and Sediment Control in New Jersey May 2012 STANDARD FOR GRASSED WATERWAYS. Definition. Purpose

THE CITY OF THE VILLAGE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DESIGN STATEMENT FOR MULFORD ESTATES

ORDINANCE APPENDIX F STORMWATER MANAGEMENT DESIGN CRITERIA

Runoff Processes. Daene C. McKinney

Appendix C Little Calumet River Watershed Curve Number Calculation

Chapter Introduction. 5.2 Computational Standard Methods HYDROLOGY

DRAINAGE STUDY CROWS LANDING INDUSTRIAL BUSINESS PARK. Stanislaus County. Prepared by:

MODULE 1 RUNOFF HYDROGRAPHS WORKSHEET 1. Precipitation

APPENDIX F RATIONAL METHOD

Basic Hydrology Runoff Curve Numbers

flows by at 100-year storm events. runoff drains

Standards for Soil Erosion and Sediment Control in New Jersey May 2012 STANDARD FOR SLOPE PROTECTION STRUCTURES. Definition

Memorandum. MIDS Work Group Barr Engineering Company

LAKE COUNTY HYDROLOGY DESIGN STANDARDS

Design Handbook. Low Impact Development Best Management Practices

Treatment Volume: Curve Numbers. Composite CN or Not? Treatment Volume: Curve Numbers. Treatment Volume: Calculation. Treatment Volume: Calculation

Porous Pavements. By Michael Drennan, P.E. Weston Solutions, Inc.

Reduced stormwater peak flows by at least 75% for 10-year storm events and 40% for 100-year storm events.

Module 14: Small Storm Hydrology, Continuous Simulations and Treatment Flow Rates The Integration of Water Quality and Drainage Design Objectives

Faculty of Applied Science and Engineering. Department of Civil Engineering. Hydrology and Hydraulics. Final Exam, April 21, 2017

STORMWATER HYDROLOGY

APPENDIX IV. APPROVED METHODS FOR QUANTIFYING HYDROLOGIC CONDITIONS OF CONCERN (NORTH ORANGE COUNTY)

What is runoff? Runoff. Runoff is often defined as the portion of rainfall, that runs over and under the soil surface toward the stream

Module 3 and Module 4 Watershed Analysis and RUSLE Calculation. Noboru Togawa. Presented to: Dr. Pitt Construction Site Erosion Control

SURFACE RUNOFF ESTIMATION BY SCS CURVE NUMBER METHOD USING GIS FOR RUPEN-KHAN WATERSHED, MEHSANA DISTRICT, GUJARAT

6.0 Runoff. 6.1 Introduction. 6.2 Flood Control Design Runoff

Precipitation Surface Cover Topography Soil Properties

Evapotranspiration Calculations for Stormwater Quality Models

Evapotranspiration Calculations for Stormwater Quality Models

Rainfall, Runoff and Peak Flows: Calibration of Hydrologic Design Methods for the Kansas City Area

Table of Contents CHAPTER. Chapter 2 Hydrologic Analysis. 2.1 Estimating Runoff

RI Site Specific Soil Mapping Standards and Procedures

DRAINAGE DESIGN AND RUTTING PERFORMANACE GUIDELINES FOR PERMEABLE PAVEMENT

How Climate Change Impacts Urban Runoff and Water Quality Design

Peak discharge computation

Permeable Pavement. Pavements constructed with these units create joints that are filled with permeable

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT DANIEL ASH POND B MISSISSIPPI POWER COMPANY

APPENDIX E APPENDIX E ESTIMATING RUNOFF FOR SMALL WATERSHEDS

TECHNICAL NOTES U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE. TEXAS Revised May, 2011 NITROGEN LEACHING INDEX FOR TEXAS

City Plaza Residential (TPM ) Preliminary Hydrology Report

ORDINANCE APPENDIX C RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS AND CURVE NUMBERS

Land Development and Soil Characteristics Affects on Runoff

Appendix F. Flow Duration Basin Design Guidance

Stormwater Non-potable Beneficial Uses: Modeling Groundwater Recharge at a Stormwater Drywell Installation. Leila Talebi 1 and Robert Pitt 2

Water Resources Management Plan Appendix B

Porous Asphalt Parking Lot Sand Run Metro Park 2400 Sand Run Parkway, Akron, Ohio. Paul D. Wilkerson, PE, CPESC

PERVIOUS PAVEMENT. Alternative Names: Permeable Pavement, Porous Concrete, Porous Pavers

SOILS INFORMATION FOR GEORGIA

CHAPTER 3 Water Quality Standards

Infiltration Guidelines

CENTRALIZED BMPS TYPICALLY PUBLICLY OWNED & MAINTAINED BMPS, TREATING A LARGE (>20 ACRES) URBAN DRAINAGE WITH MULTIPLE LAND

CEEN Geotechnical Engineering

Modular Porous Paver Systems

Public Notice U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Norfolk District

and Construction: A Design Consultant's Perspective Mark Popik, M.Eng.,P.Eng. Applied Research

Storm Water Management Design Manual Georgetown County, South Carolina

Pennsylvania Stormwater Best Management Practices Manual. Chapter 3. Stormwater Management Principles and Recommended Control Guidelines

Estimating Stormwater Runoff from the 3D-model of an Urban Area in Istanbul

2011 Guidance Manual for Development Stormwater Quality Control Measures

IBS Site Drainage: Senior Design Project

4.1 General Methodology and Data Base Development

APPENDIX E ESTIMATING RUNOFF FROM SMALL WATERSHEDS

Transcription:

REFERENCE DOCUMENTS

This page intentionally left blank

TABLE OF CONTENTS REFERENCE DOCUMENTS REFERENCE DOCUMENT A: MEAN SEASONAL PRECIPITATION MAP R 1 REFERENCE DOCUMENT B: K FACTOR R 2 REFERENCE DOCUMENT C: RUNOFF COEFFICIENT C FACTOR R 3 REFERENCE DOCUMENT D: HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUPS R -4 REFERENCE DOCUMENT E: SAMPLE STRUCTURAL SOIL SPECIFICATION R 5 REFERENCE DOCUMENT F: STRUCTURAL SOIL REFERENCE INFORMATION R 12 Low Impact Development Technical Design Manual

This page intentionally left blank

REFERENCE DOCUMENT A MEAN SEASONAL PRECIPITATION MAP City of Santa Rosa and County of Sonoma

REFERENCE DOCUMENT B K FACTOR Low Impact Development Technical Design Manual

REFERENCE DOCUMENT B 2.5 2.5 2.0 2.0 1.5 1.5 1.0 1.0 0.5 0.5 K FACTOR K = MEAN SEASONAL PRECIPITATION DIVIDED BY 30 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 MEAN SEASONAL PRECIPITATION - INCHES Page R-2 PROVIDED BY THE SONOMA COUNTY WATER AGENCY

REFERENCE DOCUMENT C RUNOFF COEFFICIENT C FACTOR City of Santa Rosa and County of Sonoma

REFERENCE DOCUMENT C 6 Runoff Reduction Areas 6.1 Design Philosophy Using alternative surfaces with a lower coefficient of runoff or C-Factor helps reduce runoff from developed areas. The C-Factor is a representation of a surface s ability to produce runoff. Surfaces that produce higher volumes of runoff are represented by higher C-Factors, such as impervious surfaces. Surfaces that produce smaller volumes of runoff are represented by lower C-Factors, such as more pervious surfaces. See Table 6-1 for typical C-Factor values for various surfaces during small storms. Pervious Concrete Pervious Asphalt Turf Block Brick (un-grouted) Natural Stone Concrete Unit Pavers Table 6-2 compares the C-Factors of conventional paving surfaces to alternative, lower C-Factor paving surfaces. By incorporating more pervious, lower C-Factor surfaces into a development, lower volumes of runoff are produced. Lower volumes and rates of runoff translate directly to lower treatment requirements. Site design techniques may be used to reduce the C- Factor of a developed area, reducing the amount of runoff requiring treatment, including: Crushed Aggregate Cobbles Wood Mulch Other site design techniques such as disconnecting impervious areas, preservation of natural areas, and designing concave medians may be used to reduce the overall C-Factor of development areas. Table 6-1 Estimated C-Factors for Various Surfaces During Small Storms Paving Surface Concrete Asphalt Pervious Concrete Cobbles Pervious Asphalt Natural Stone without Grout Turf Block Brick without Grout Unit Pavers on Sand Crushed Aggregate Grass Grass Over Porous Plastic Gravel Over Porous Plastic C-Factor 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.60 0.55 0.25 0.15 0.13 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.05 0.05 Note: C-Factors for frequent small storms used to size water quality BMPs are likely to differ (be lower) than C-Factors developed for infrequent, large storms used to size flood control facilities. The above C-Factors were produced by selecting the lower end of the best available C-Factor range for each paving surface. These C-Factors are only appropriate for small storm treatment design, and should not be used for flood control sizing. Where available, locally developed small storm C-Factors for various surfaces should be utilized. Page R-3 Provided by BASMA

REFERENCE DOCUMENT D HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUPS Low Impact Development Technical Design Manual

REFERENCE DOCUMENT D Appendix B Hydr Synt ologic het ic Soil Rainfall Gr oups Dist r ibut ions and Rainfall Dat a Sour ces Ex hi bi t A: Hydr ol ogi c Soil Gr oups f or t he Uni t ed St at es Soils are classified into hydrologic soil groups (HSG s) Di st u r b ed so il p r o f iles to indicate the minimum rate of infiltration obtained for The bare highest soil after peak prolonged discharges wetting. from The small HSG watersheds s, which in are the United As a States result are of urbanization, usually caused the by soil intense, profile brief may rainfalls A, B, that C, and may D, occur are one as element distinct events used in or determining as part of a longer storm. siderably These altered intense and rainstorms the listed do group not usually classification ex- may be contended runoff curve over numbers a large area (see and chapter intensities 2). For vary the greatly. convenience synthetic of TR-55 rainfall users, distribution exhibit A-1 to use lists in the lieu HSG of classifi- actual storm events. ing to This determine distribution HSG according includes maximum to the texture rainfall of the One common no longer practice apply. in rainfall-runoff In these circumstances, analysis is use to develop the follow- a intensities cation of United for the States selected soils. design frequency arranged in a sequence new surface that is soil, critical provided for producing that significant peak runoff. compaction has not occurred (Brakensiek and Rawls 1983). Syn The infiltration t h et i c rate r ainf is the all rate at d which i st r iwater b u t enters i o n sthe soil at the soil surface. It is controlled by surface conditions. length HSG also of the indicates most intense the transmission rainfall period rate contributing the rateto the peak runoff rate is related to the time of concentration which (Tthe c ) for water the moves watershed. within In the a hydrograph soil. This rate created is with NRCS Aprocedures, Sand, th loamy sand, or sandy loam HSG Soi l textures The controlled by the soil profile. Approximate numerical B Silt loam or loam ranges for transmission rates shown in the HSG definitions were first published by Musgrave (USDA 1955). C Sandy clay loam D Clay loam, silty clay loam, sandy clay, silty The four groups are defined by SCS soil scientists as clay, or clay follows: Gr oup A soils have low runoff potential and high infiltration rates even when thoroughly wetted. They consist chiefly of deep, well to excessively drained sand or gravel and have a high rate of water transmission (greater than 0.30 in/hr). Gr oup B soils have moderate infiltration rates when thoroughly wetted and consist chiefly of moderately deep to deep, moderately well to well drained soils with moderately fine to moderately coarse textures. These soils have a moderate rate of water transmission (0.15-0.30 in/hr). Gr oup C soils have low infiltration rates when thoroughly wetted and consist chiefly of soils with a layer that impedes downward movement of water and soils with moderately fine to fine texture. These soils have a low rate of water transmission (0.05-0.15 in/hr). Gr oup Dsoils have high runoff potential. They have very low infiltration rates when thoroughly wetted and consist chiefly of clay soils with a high swelling potential, soils with a permanent high water table, soils with a claypan or clay layer at or near the surface, and shallow soils over nearly impervious material. These soils have a very low rate of water transmission (0-0.05 in/hr). In exhibit A-1, some of the listed soils have an added modifier; for example, Abrazo, gravelly. This refers to a gravelly phase of the Abrazo series that is found in SCS soil map legends. Dr ainage an d gr o u p D so ils Some soils in the list are in group D because of a high water table that creates a drainage problem. Once these soils are effectively drained, they are placed in a different group. For example, Ackerman soil is classified as A/D. This indicates that the drained Ackerman soil is in group A and the undrained soil is in group D. Page R-4

REFERENCE DOCUMENT E SAMPLE STRUCTURAL SOIL SPECIFICATIONS City of Santa Rosa and County of Sonoma

REFERENCE DOCUMENT E CU-Soil Specification and Mixing Procedure CU-Soil is a patented material and must be purchased from a licensed supplier. Amereq (http://www.amereq.com/) licenses the manufacturing of CU-Soil to ensure quality control of installations. Page R-5

Page R-6

Page R-7

Page R-8

Page R-9

Page R-10

Page R-11