APC REPORT. TO: APC C Members File No: DP PL

Similar documents
Relevant Excerpts from Electoral Area C Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 725

EAD REPORT. TO: Chair and Electoral Area Directors File No: BL900 GEN

^ l.^^ i^-- Charles Hamilton, CAO

Wharf, Dock and Buoy Policy

Section 9 Specific Use Regulations

Mooring in Alberta: Defining the Policy Issues and Solutions. October 17, 2014 Annual General Meeting Association of Summer Villages of Alberta

PENDER HARBOUR DOCK MANAGEMENT PLAN

DRAFT - CLALLAM COUNTY SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM (SMP)

Provincial Mooring Directive and Disturbance Standard for Temporary Seasonal Docks for Personal Use. October 2016

BOWEN ISLAND. Municipality

Lot 3. Lot 2. Lot 1 KAP KAP Lot A. Lot A

DIVISION SEVEN RESIDENTIAL ZONES. 1. Permitted Uses of Land, Buildings, and Structures

Exhibit B Shoreline Checklist & Statement of Exemption Form for Ensuring Consistency with SMP Policies and Regulations and No Net Loss Policy

DOCK CONSTRUCTION GUIDE

CHAPTER 5 WO - WATERFRONT OVERLAY DISTRICT (Amended 03/12/2012), (Amended 11/12/2012

PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE May 14, 2015 SCRD Board Room, 1975 Field Road, Sechelt, BC AMENDED AGENDA

Initial Project Review

PUBLIC HEARING INFORMATION PACKAGE

Request for Decision STAFF REPORT. Recommendation. Presented To: Planning Committee. Presented: Tuesday, Jan 11, 2011

City of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT File:

Specific Project Information Form For Construction of New or Modification of Existing Residential Overwater Structures

DOUGLAS COUNTY TRANSPORTATION & LAND SERVICES

Shuswap Lake Integrated Planning Process Foreshore Development Interagency Technical Committee. Prepared For: Fraser Basin Council Society

Lake Anna Shoreline Packet for Lake Structures Updated March 23, 2018

I. GENERAL INFORMATION

Frequently Asked Questions

AGENDA: Steering Committee (#21) [v2]

SUNSHINE COAST REGIONAL DISTRICT. January 11, 2018

The following changes are recommended to ensure compliance with the SMA (RCW 90.58) and the SMP Guidelines (WAC , Part III):

SHO Recommendations June 16, Exhibit #11

Chapter 516 Shoreland Districts

TOWNSHIP OF GEORGIAN BAY. ZONING BY-LAW November 10, 2014

OFFICIAL PLAN. Office Consolidation

HOW TO OBTAIN A BUILDING PERMIT

Shoreline Restoration Planning. Technical Review Committee December 17, 2008 City of Tacoma Shoreline Master Program Update

dpd Seattle Permits CAM Environmentally Critical Areas: Wetlands and Fish & Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas

WELCOME. RM of Big River Official Community Plan & Zoning Bylaw. The purpose of this Open House is: What is a Zoning Bylaw? Background information:

From the ADA and ABA Accessibility Guidelines for Buildings and Facilities

THETIS ISLAND BYLAW NO. 42 VALDES ISLAND RURAL LAND USE BYLAW, 1998

DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND BUILDING STAFF REPORT TO CITY OF LAKE FOREST PARK HEARING EXAMINER

Date: December 2, 2016 Meeting Date: December 12, 2016

City of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT File: Development Permit Development Variance Permit

Minnesota s Alternative Shoreland Management Standards

The Corporation of the City of Kenora. By-law Number A By-law to Amend the Comprehensive Zoning By-Law Number , as amended

Sustainable Natural Environment Fish Habitat

Schedule for Completion of Study The study required pursuant to this section shall be completed in accordance with the following schedule:

CLALLAM COUNTY. Final Draft. Shoreline Master Program (SMP) Proposed Update to the 1992 Clallam County SMP

Fish Habitat Protection Development Permit Area

205. MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (RM5) This District provides for high density apartment accommodation. (B/L No.

This brochure outlines zoning information for single-family and two-family dwellings in the R1 to R5 and R9 to R10 Districts.

SUMMARY OF MAJOR POLICY IMPLEMENTATION TOPICS From 2016 COUNTY Comprehensive Plan

Lane Code CHAPTER 16 CONTENTS

2.1 Basis of the Designations

SEDs. Comments from Skokomish Tribe

Rob; Sincerely, Brian Causton, President FMLA. Jim Russell, Vice President FMLA [67 Highland Crescent, Cambridge, ON, N1S 1M1]

ECOLOGY MAY 25, 2011 PUBLIC HEARING COMMENT SUMMARY MATRIX CITY OF BELLINGHAM SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM

STAFF REPORT WASHINGTON STATE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION COVERED SHELTERS AND BIKE RACKS

COLUMBIA SHUSWAP REGIONAL DISTRICT Electoral Area Directors' Committee Meeting AGENDA

Waterfront Land Use. Michigan Coastal Community Working Waterfronts. Table of Contents. Case Studies

Shoreland Rules Revision Project Using GIS in North-Central Minnesota

Regional Watersheds Advisory Board. September 20, 2017

City Commission Workshop

Shoreland Protection Innovative Model Ordinance

Article XII Overlay Districts

ACTIVITIES ON THE SURFACE OF WATER RULES

AGENDA: Steering Committee (#25) [v1]

Public Notice: Application for Permit

Section 231 FOREST LAKES OVERLAY DISTRICT (rev. 12/8/08, 10/25/16, 06/13/17) 1. INTENT. The inland lakes of East Bay Charter Township are a defining

Skagit County Planning Development Services

Green Lake, B.C. Lakeshore Survey

Official Plans. Zoning By-laws. Site Plan Control Development Approvals and Agreements. Figure 28 Municipal Planning Tools

CLALLAM COUNTY. Preliminary Draft Committee Review. Shoreline Master Program (SMP) Proposed Update to the 1992 Clallam County SMP

Strip District Zoning PROPOSED UPDATES

Chapter 4 Policies and Regulations for Shoreline Modifications

Klickitat County Shoreline Master Plan Update. Open House November 15, 2017

2.4 Description of the No Action and Action Alternatives

City of Surrey ADDITIONAL PLANNING COMMENTS File:

I. GENERAL INFORMATION

BMP 5.4.2: Protect /Conserve/Enhance Riparian Areas

Exhibit #16. Additional SHO Recommendations June 13, 2011

HARBOR INFRASTRUCTURE INVENTORIES Presque Isle Harbor, Michigan

BEDWELL BAY SUSTAINABILITY PLAN

Waterfront Lands Analysis By: BST Associates For: City of Tacoma

LAKE BELLAIRE SHORELINE SURVEY SUMMARY REPORT

Applicant Information

For use by Principal Authority. A. Project information Building number, street name Unit number Lot/con. Street address Unit number Lot/con.

STAFF REPORT PIERRE SINGLE USE DOCK

Master Contents Chapter 2 Alternatives, Including the Proposed Action

Menominee County Zoning and Building Permitting Requirements

STAFF REPORT PARMENTER DUFENHORST BOATLIFT AND MOORING BUOY

REGIONAL BOARD REPORT

Public Notice NATIONWIDE PERMIT REISSUANCE FOR THE STATE OF OHIO

City of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT File:

Date: March 18, 2016 Meeting Date: March 29, 2016

APPENDIX I District of Lake Country Results

APPLICATION NUMBER A REQUEST FOR

MARINA PHASING AND COSTS

STAFF REPORT RIVERLAKE JOINT USE DOCKS AND BOATLIFTS

Model Riparian Buffer Ordinance.

DP Glacier Lane Whistler/Blackcomb Lift Workshop Addition Council Presentation. April 14, 2015

Transcription:

APC REPORT TO: APC C Members File No: DP725-137 PL20180000028 FROM: Erica Hartling Development Services Assistant Date: March 16, 2018 SUBJECT: Electoral Area C: Development Permit 725-137 SHORT SUMMARY: The applicant is proposing to install a dock on the foreshore adjacent to the subject property. A Development Permit is required for all dock and buoy installations. The proposed dock exceeds the size requirements outlined in Lakes Zoning Bylaw No. 900 by more than 10%. As such the Development Permit must be approved by the Regional District Board in accordance with Development Services Procedures Bylaw No. 4001. BACKGROUND: REGISTERED OWNER(S): Elizabeth Anne Robertson Shepherd APPLICANT: Nadine Mayer, Triton Docks Inc ELECTORAL AREA: C LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 1, Section 4, Township 23, Range 9, West of the 6th Meridian, Kamloops Division Yale District, Plan 43738 PID: 016-441-605 CIVIC ADDRESS: 4162 Galligan Road SURROUNDING LAND USE PATTERN: North = Rural residential South = Rural residential East = Shuswap Lake West = Rural residential CURRENT USE: Single Family Dwelling, dock, two mooring buoys PROPOSED USE: The proposed dock is to replace the floating dock that is currently existing at this location. The proposed dock measures 9.144 m (30 ft.) x 3.048 m (10 ft.) with a surface area of 27.87 m 2 (300 ft 2 ) in size and a width of 3.048 m (10 ft.). The proposed associated walkway is 0.9144 m (3 ft.) x 9.144 m (30 ft.), with a width of 0.9144 m (3 ft.). PARCEL SIZE: 0.74 ha (1.84 ac) Page 1 of 5

DESIGNATION: Electoral Area C Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 725 RR - Rural Residential ZONE: South Shuswap Zoning Bylaw No. 701 Land = RR1 - Rural Residential (.4ha) Lakes Zoning Bylaw No. 900 Foreshore = FR1 - Foreshore Residential 1 SHUSWAP WATERSHED INVENTORY MAPPING: Aquatic Habitat Index Rating Moderate Shoreline Type - Rocky SITE COMMENTS: This property is located at Eagle Bay in Electoral Area C. The upland has a single family dwelling and the foreshore has an existing dock and two mooring buoys. POLICY: Electoral Area C Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 725 Section 3.7 Foreshore Water (FW) (Moorage) 3.7.1 Objective.1 To acknowledge existing permitted private moorage uses and commercial marinas and provide limited opportunities for future moorage associated with residential development. 3.7.2 Policies.1 Moorage, including docks, private moorage buoys and boat lifts, may be considered only for new fee simple waterfront parcels..2 New development proposals on the waterfront parcel will provide a maximum of 1 moorage space per: a) New waterfront parcel created; or b) 30 m of water frontage of the parent parcel; and c) Each moorage space shall be calculated as 10 m linear length of dock that may be used for mooring a single vessel..3 Dry land boat storage solutions are strongly preferred over floating or fixed docks for all new or redeveloped waterfront properties..4 Moorage proposals will be located away from or redesigned to avoid negative impacts on adjacent structures and uses, including other docks, marinas, beach access points, parks, utilities, water intakes, etc..5 Support for new waterfront proposals should consider the provision of related public amenities such as dedicated moorage spaces and facilities for public use, dedicated public accesses to the foreshore (including boat launches), waterfront park dedication, or similar amenities which enable greater public access and use of the foreshore and water. Page 2 of 5

.6 Moorage should be located away from or be designed to have minimal impact on fish and riparian habitat. The Shuswap Watershed Mapping Project data, as updated from time to time on the Community Mapping Network (www.cmnbc.ca), should be referenced to help determine habitat values (other government data sources may also be utilized). Lakes Zoning Bylaw No. 900 4.4 FR1 Foreshore Residential 1 1. Permitted Uses: (a) Floating dock, including removable walkway, that is accessory to a permitted use on an adjacent waterfront parcel. (b) Private mooring buoy(s) that is accessory to a permitted use on an adjacent waterfront parcel or an adjacent semi-waterfront parcel. (c) Boat lift(s) that is accessory to a permitted use on an adjacent waterfront parcel. 2. Regulations COLUMN 1 MATTER REGULATED COLUMN 2 REGULATION (a) Density maximum number of docks and private mooring buoys: o Dock: 1 floating dock per adjacent waterfront parcel. o Private mooring buoys: (a) 1 per adjacent semi-waterfront parcel. (b) 1 per adjacent waterfront parcel having a lake boundary length less than 30 m (98.43 ft.). (c) 2 per adjacent waterfront parcel having a lake boundary length 30 m (98.43 ft.) or more. (b) Size of dock and walkway: o Floating dock must not exceed 24 m 2 (258.33 ft 2 ) in total upward facing surface area (not including removable walkway). o Floating dock surface must not exceed 3 m (9.84 ft) in width for any portion of the dock. o Removable walkway surface must not exceed 1.5 m (4.92 ft.) in width for any other portion of the walkway. Page 3 of 5

(c) Location and Siting of dock, private mooring buoys or boat lifts: The minimum setback of a floating dock, private mooring buoy or boat lift accessory to an adjacent waterfront parcel (and adjacent semiwaterfront parcel in the case of private mooring buoys) is as follows: o 5 m (16.4 ft) from the side parcel boundaries of that waterfront parcel (and semi-waterfront parcel in the case of private mooring buoys), projected onto the foreshore and water. o 6 m (19.69 ft) from a Foreshore Park (FP) zone or park side parcel boundaries projected onto the foreshore and water. Additional setbacks for private mooring buoys: o 20 m (65.62 ft) from any existing structures on the foreshore or water. o 50 m (164.04 ft.) from any boat launch ramp or marina. KEY ISSUES/CONCEPTS: The proposed dock is to replace the floating dock (9.25 m x 3.048 m, with a surface area of 28.2 m 2 ) that is currently existing at this location. The proposed dock measures 9.144 m (30 ft.) x 3.048 m (10 ft.) with a surface area of 27.87 m 2 (300 ft 2 ) in size and a width of 3.048 m (10 ft.). The proposed associated walkway is 0.9144 m (3 ft.) x 9.144 m (30 ft.), with a width of 0.9144 m (3 ft.). As the maximum permitted dock surface area in the FR1 zone is 24 m 2 and maximum width is 3 m, two variances are required for the proposed dock size. o Section 4.4.2(b) maximum total upward facing surface area of a floating dock from 24 m 2 (258.33 ft 2 ) to 27.87 m 2 (300 ft 2 ); and, maximum width of a floating dock from 3.0 m (9.84 ft) to 3.048 m (10 ft). The applicant has identified that the proposed variance to the total surface area of dock is intended to meet the required depth of 1.5 m to moor a boat, as outlined in the Ministry of Environment best management design practices. The design minimum clearance below a floating structure at low water is 1.5 m to avoid the wash from propellers disturbing the waterbody floor. As the property sits in a shallow bay, the applicant has increased both the walkway and the dock to allow for further depth. In order to meet the 1.5 m depth, the dock length has been proposed to be 1.144 m greater than the typical 8 m length, with a total of 9.144 m (30 ft.). The proposed minor dock width variance is requested for ease of construction and saving material, as the standard dock materials and frame kits are measured and sold in feet and when converted to metric (metres), exceed the dock maximum width by 0.05 m. Front Counter BC grants general permissions for dock structures constructed and used in accordance with the terms and conditions contained in the General Permission with no application required. Where a dock is proposed that does not comply with any one of the conditions, the owner must apply for a Page 4 of 5

Specific Permission through Front Counter BC. All structures built below the foreshore require a Water Act Section 11 approval to construct. An application to Front Counter BC for a Section 11 approval was made for the proposed dock. This permit addresses local government regulations only. SUMMARY: The applicant has applied for a Development Permit to replace a dock on the foreshore adjacent to the subject property. The proposal includes a request to vary the maximum upward facing area for a dock from 24 m 2 as permitted in Lakes Zoning Bylaw No. 900 to 27.87 m 2 ; and, maximum width of a floating dock from 3.0 m to 3.048 m. As this variance exceeds what is allowed by bylaw by more than 10%, it cannot be approved by the Manager of Development Services and must be approved by the Board. COMMUNICATIONS: Notice of the proposed variance will be sent to all owners of property within 100 m of the subject property 10 days in advance of the meeting at which the application will be considered by the Board. LIST NAME OF REPORT(S) / DOCUMENT(S) ATTACHED TO APC REPORT: 1. Maps_Plans_DP725-137: Location, Zoning, OCP, Site Plan, Orthophoto, Shuswap Watershed Inventory Page 5 of 5