Season-Long Patterns of Attraction of Brown Marmorated Stink Bug to Pheromone Lure in Orchard Agroecosystems

Similar documents
Multi-State Pheromone Trials Early Season Results

Tactics that reduce the use of broad-spectrum insecticides.

Overview of Brown Marmorated Stink Bug Research & Extension Programs

Development of Behaviorally Based Monitoring Tools and Management Strategies for the Brown Marmorated Stink Bug

NE BMSB Update for George C. Hamilton Department of Entomology Rutgers University

Brown Marmorated Stink Bug: Management Strategies for a New New England Pest

Identification. Brown Marmorated Stink Bug Life History 11/18/2011

Grant Objectives. USDA-ARS, Appalachian Fruit Research Station Insect Behavior and Ecology Laboratory

2. Where do you work?

Brown Marmorated Stink Bug Halyomorpha halys. Photo: Susan Ellis, Bugwood.org #

Monitoring and control strategy of Brown marmorated stink bug (Halyomorpha halys ) in Georgia

Brown Marmorated Stink Bug and More: Invasive Species Monitoring in Illinois

Final 2011 Delaware Soybean Board Report

Enhancing BC in organic orchards: Using HIPV lures to characterize, monitor, and manipulate natural enemies

Insects in Vegetables: A Review of 2011 and What to Know for Rick Foster Purdue University

Managing secondary pests post-op insecticides. Ric Bessin Extension Entomologist

Brown Marmorated Stink Bug Project Communications Review December 2015

Brown marmorated stink bug (BMSB; Halyomorpha

Brown Marmorated Stink Bug IPM Working Group Meeting. Virginia Tech

Jhalendra Rijal IPM Farm Advisor-North San Joaquin Valley San Joaquin, Stanislaus, Merced Counties University of California Cooperative Extension

Over the past eight years, the invasive Brown Marmorated

Benefits of Pyrethroids to Citrus

Program: Partnership. Project Title: Northeast Tree Fruit IPM Working Group. Project Type: IPM Working Groups

BROWN MARMORATED STINK BUG

Black Stem Borer Management Trials

Qualitative analysis of the pest risk potential of the brown marmorated stink bug (BMSB), Halyomorpha halys (Stål), in the United States

Development of an IPM Program for the Western Spotted Cucumber Beetle in Vegetable Cropping Systems John Luna

P. DILIP VENUGOPAL GALEN DIVELY WILLIAM LAMP. Department of Entomology, 4112 Plant Sciences Bldg University of Maryland College Park, MD 20742

Neonicotinoids. Neonicotinoid Profile. Safety. Neonicotinoids and Bees

Delmarva Feed Grain Overview and Forecast

Ongoing Research and Extension Activities

Invasive Insects: A Tour*

MARYLAND. Forest Resource Summary. Forest Health Programs

Integrated Pest Management 1: Sampling. Matthew J. Grieshop PhD Department of Entomology Michigan State University

Update on New Insect Invaders Dr. Paul Castrovillo Pest Survey and Detection Manager Idaho State Department of Agriculture

Management of Brown Marmorated Stink Bug in US Specialty Crops 2017 ANNUAL REPORT

Biology and Management of Bark Beetles (Shothole Borer) in Stone and Pome Fruits

National Clean Plant Network (NCPN) Update

Organic Research GRANT PROGRAMS FOR ORGANIC AND SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE

Mating disruption then, now and the future

Table of Contents. Objective 2: Develop monitoring and management tools for BMSB

Mile-a-Minute Project of the Hudson Valley

Fungicide Resistance Management Guidelines for the Control of Tomato Diseases in the Mid- Atlantic and Northeast Regions of the United States

Halyomorpha halys (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) Response to Pyramid Traps Baited with Attractive Light and Pheromonal Stimuli

Title: Integrated control of viburnum leaf beetle with minimally toxic methods

The spatial behavior of the brown marmorated stink bug (Halyomorpha halys) in peach trees

Lake Ontario Fruit Program Quarterly Highlights Jan-March, 2017

Identification and Grower Education of Key Pests in Apple Orchards in Northern New York

Brown Marmorated Stink Bug Workshop: An imminent threat to Australia and New Zealand

David Madge Research Scientist, Department of Primary Industries, Victoria

2007 Woolly and Green Apple Aphid Control Trial in Apples Utah Agricultural Experiment Station, Kaysville, UT

Food Program. EPA also codified updates to the stone fruit and tree nut crop groups.

Value of Foraging Bats: IPM Far and Wide

Cold tolerance of two potential biological control agents of the brown marmorated stink bug

Entomopathogenic fungi to suppress BMSB. Participants: Thomas Pike (Graduate Student), Paula Shrewsbury, Ray St. Leger, Department of Entomology, UMD

Photo: Donald Hobern, 2008 wikimedia commons. Light Brown Apple Moth Epiphyas postvittana

Thomas Kuhar & John Aigner

STINK BUG ECOLOGY IN SOUTHEASTERN FARMSCAPES

Dr. Julie M. Urban Department of Entomology Penn State University. Photo : Pennsylvania Dept. of Agriculture

Potatoes Summary. September United States Department of Agriculture. National Agricultural Statistics Service.

A Strategy for Priori.zing Research Goals and Outreach Plans to Reduce Soybean Produc.on Losses Caused by S.nk Bugs and Related Insect Pests

Statewide Insect Pest Survey in Soybeans

Outline. Why IR 4 remains relevant Accomplishments What keeps me up at night Future

PJM EIS Generation Attribute Tracking System (GATS)

Asian Carp Control Technology Development and Potential Applications

YEAR 2 STAKEHOLDER UPDATE

Project Title: Development and Implementation of Novel Trapping Systems for Monitoring Cranberry Fruitworm and Cranberry Weevil Populations

Potatoes Summary. September United States Department of Agriculture. National Agricultural Statistics Service.

In China, > 20 species of mirid bugs were recorded in cotton fields. These above five species are the major ones. Yanhui Lu, IPP-CAAS 1

Treatments for Brown Marmorated Stink Bug

Pheromone Trap Assisted Scouting - Mexican Rice Borer in Sugarcane

Are Apple Tree Canker Diseases Impacted by Glyphosate Herbicide?

Pest management is a vital part of tree fruit production on

Brown Marmorated Stink Bug IPM Working Group Meeting

INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT. insights. Spring 2014 Northeastern IPM Center

Insect Control Research for Pecan

Invasion of redhaired pine bark beetle into the Southern California National Forest system following fires

Who s eating who? Evaluating predators and parasitoids and the influence of the farm-scape using protein-marking and gut content analysis

EFFECTIVE AUGMENTATIVE BIOLOGICAL CONTROL IMPORTANCE OF NATURAL ENEMY DISPERSAL, HOST LOCATION, AND POST-RELEASE ASSESSMENT

Cranberry Fruitworm in BC. Tracy Hueppelsheuser British Columbia Ministry of Agriculture BC Cranberry Congress, Feb. 4, 2014

Extension Implementation Program. Departments {NO DATA ENTERED}

Field Day Forum. Oct 27, Cornell University New York State Agricultural Experiment Station Geneva, NY

Operational approach

2018 RURAL DEVELOPMENT FUND GRANT. Application Proposal (FY 18/19)

The Oklahoma First Energy Plan: A Pragmatic Path Forward

USDA Programs Addressing Pollinator Decline and CCD

Conservation Committee Report Volume 13 Issue 7

Wheat Science News. MANAGING VOLUNTEER CORN IN ORDER TO BREAK THE GREEN BRIDGE IN WHEAT James R. Martin Extension Professor of Wheat Science

Ambrosia Beetle (Xylosandrus germanus) Infestations and Management Trials in High-Density Apple Orchards

Effects of Mixed Species Cover Crops on Soil Health

Implications of Cover Crops for Crop and Insect Management the good, the bad, and the ugly SCOTT D. STEWART THE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE

Spring Statistics. Supporting Potential New Grape Farmers in Eastern NY

Biological Control: The Basics. Ian Brown Ph.D. Georgia Southwestern State University

Assessing Vulnerability and Adaptation Potential of Northeast Agriculture to Climate Change

I-95 Corridor Coalition Vehicle Probe Project Scope and Methodology

Using Trap Crops to Control Brown Marmorated Stink Bugs & The Feasibility of Biodegradable Mulches

Halyomorpha halys in Italy: first results of field monitoring in fruit orchards

Concepts of Integrated Pest Management for Ornamentals and Turf

Educating Farmers and Ag Professionals about Invasive Species in Pesticide Training Workshops. Gary Wyatt Extension Educator, Agroforestry

Transcription:

Season-Long Patterns of Attraction of Brown Marmorated Stink Bug to Pheromone Lure in Orchard Agroecosystems Tracy. C. Leskey, Starker E. Wright, Ashot Khrimian, Aijun Zhang, and Donald C. Weber

Brown Marmorated Stink Bug is a Devastating Pest of Tree Fruit

Feeding and Reproduction Throughout The Season

Lack of Monitoring Tools and Knowledge July 29, 2010 Many mid-atlantic growers in WV, MD, PA, NJ and VA had significant losses. Numerous growers lost over 50% of their peach crop in 2010. Some lost their entire crop.

% Fruit Injury 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 BMSB Feeding Injury Rate and Severity Regional Commercial Apple Orchards 2010 Growing Season Severity = 4.26 Perimeter Economic Injury Orchard Sample Location Severity = 3.11 Interior 2010 economic loss in mid-atlantic apples due to BMSB feeding estimated at 37 million dollars (US Apple Association)

Development of Effective Detection and Monitoring Tools Tools that provide accurate measurements of presence, abundance, and seasonal activity of BMSB. Growers can make informed management decisions.

Key Components: 2009-2010 Studies Visual Stimulus Large black pyramid Olfactory Stimulus methyl (2E,4E,6Z)-decatrienoate Capture Mechanism Tapered pyramid to inverted funnel jar with DDVP toxicant strip Deployment Strategy Traps placed in peripheral row of orchard

Methyl (2E, 4E, 6Z)- decatrieonate. Pheromone of Plautia stali Cross attractive to brown marmorated stink bug and other pentatomids. Reports from Asia and U.S.

Will BMSB Respond to Methyl (2E, 4E, 6Z)-Decatrienoate in the early-season? Reports of earlyseason attraction in Asia. Previous trials had relied on low doses (<5 mg). Evaluated 66 mg lures.

Despite Reports in the Asian Literature, Our Only Attractant Fails During the Early- and Mid-Season Methyl (2E,4E,6Z)-decatrieonate (MDT) attractive to adults only during the late-season. Confirmed in MD, WV, NJ, PA, VA and other states in 2011. Not attractive to adults in early- and mid-season.

Mean No. Per Trap Almost No Captures in Traps Baited with MDT, Despite Very Large Immigrating Populations 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Serious Early-Season Invasion Period Sample Date

Identification of BMSB Aggregation Pheromone

Mean No. Per Trap Identification of the BMSB Aggregation Pheromone 9-30 September 2011 1000 a 800 600 400 200 b b b b 0 #2 #6 #9 #10 Unbaited Treatment Traps baited with #10 captured ~15x more than control and ~3-4x more than other treatments.

Is #10 Attractive in the Early Season? Pre-Trial (March 20-April 17, 2012)

Early Season Attraction Documented for BMSB March 20-April 17, 2012 N = 77 BMSB N = 8 BMSB

Biology, Ecology, and Management of Brown Marmorated Stink Bug in Orchard Crops, Small Fruit, Grapes, Vegetables, and Ornamentals USDA-NIFA SCRI Project USDA-ARS Appalachian Fruit Research Station, Kearneysville, WV Beneficial Insects Introduction Research Unit, Newark, DE Invasive Insect Biocontrol and Behavior Laboratory, Beltsville, MD Horticultural Crops Research Unit, Corvallis, OR The Pennsylvania State University Washington State University North Carolina State University Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Rutgers University Northeastern IPM Center Oregon State University University of Maryland University of Delaware Cornell University Photo Courtesy of Chris Bergh

Broad Validation in Multi-State Trial Is BMSB attracted to #10 in the early season? Is BMSB attracted to #10 season-long? How attractive is this stimulus relative to MDT and unbaited traps? WV, MD, VA, PA, NJ, NY, DE, NC, OR, WA, and OH

Leveraged and In-Kind Support USDA-ARS USDA-APHIS AgBio Sterling/Rescue Total of 350 Traps Deployed Across 12 States

General Protocol Black pyramid traps Three odor treatments 1) #10 2) MDT 3) unbaited control Traps are deployed between wild host habitat and agricultural production area. Traps were deployed in mid-april and left in place season-long.

Mean No. Per Trap Early Season Summary Mid-April to Mid-June 2012 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 Trap Capture Ratios #10:Unbaited 11 : 1 MDT:Unbaited 1 : 1 #10:MDT 9 : 1 0.4 0.2 0 19-Apr 26-Apr 3-May 10-May 17-May 24-May 31-May 7-Jun 14-Jun Sample Date #10 MDT Control BMSB reliably captured by traps baited with #10. These captures represents invading overwintering adults during early season.

Mean No. Per Trap Mid-Season Summary Mid-June to Mid-August 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 Trap Capture Ratios #10:Unbaited 7 : 1 MDT:Unbaited 4 : 1 #10:MDT 2 : 1 0.2 0.1 0 25-Jun 2-Jul 9-Jul 16-Jul 23-Jul 30-Jul 6-Aug 13-Aug Sample Date #10 MDT Control Low numbers during much of mid-season. Increasing populations beginning in mid-july.

Mean No. Per Trap 80 70 60 50 40 Late-Season Summary Mid-August to Mid-October Trap Capture Ratios #10:Unbaited 12 : 1 MDT:Unbaited 90 : 1 MDT:#10 7 : 1 30 20 10 0 20-Aug 3-Sep 17-Sep 1-Oct Sample Date #10 MDT Control MDT very attractive and #10 attractive in late season. MDT outcompetes #10 in late season at tested release rates. Large numbers in the field.

Season-Long Trap Captures Adult Captures Period Time Reps #10 MDT Control Early Season Mid-April to Mid-June 79 208 26 18 Mid Season Mid-June to Mid-August 81 568 443 59 Late Season Mid-August to Mid-October 81 3793 14420 421 Nymphal Captures Period Time Reps #10 MDT Control Early Season Mid-April to Mid-June 79 2 11 6 Mid Season Mid-June to Mid-August 81 4845 11990 666 Late Season Mid-August to Mid-October 81 2714 10633 638

Mean No. BMSB Per Trap Dose Response Trial June 14-July 19, 2012 Mean No. BMSB Per Trap 11:1 Ratio (Baited: Unbaited) for 10 mg lure ~25:1 Ratio (Baited: Unbaited) for 100 mg lure 50 45 Adults 250 40 35 30 25 Shepherdstown Keedysville a a 200 150 Nymphs Shepherdstown Keedysville a a 20 15 10 5 0 ab b b b b b b b Control 0.1 mg 1 mg 10 mg 100 mg Dose 100 50 0 b b ab b a b b b b b c Control 0.1 mg 1 mg 10 mg 100 mg Dose

Lure Affordability: Encouraging Results from Purity Trial a a a b

Conclusions Aggregation pheromone of BMSB has been identified. This stimulus provides reliable, seasonlong detection of BMSB. Likely will need a higher loading of material. Crude material can be used to formulate lures, reducing overall costs. MDT is very sensitive stimulus in the lateseason.

Peak Late-Season Captures using MDT in Commercial Apple Orchards Indicative of Early-Season Populations The Following Year Year Adults Nymphs 2010 68.1 ± 21.0a 5.2 ± 1.6ab 2011 6.7 ± 2.7b 0.3 ± 0.2b 2012 60.6 ± 6.8a 7.4 ± 2.0a

Visual Cues Identifying Optimal Wavelengths and Intensities of Light

Experimental Light Traps

Night View

Traps Provisioned With Blue 25W Compact Fluorescent Bulbs Attractive and Species-Specific

Season-Long Evaluation of Combination Stimuli Preliminary Results 2012 Light #10 Combination Control Line of Sight To Light #10 Combination Control Trap 178 m 2 7.5 ± 1.6b (448) 4.1±0.8bc (246) 15.0 ± 3.4a (898) 0.3 ± 0.1c (20) 10 m 2 0.8 ± 0.2bc (47) 2.2 ± 0.5a (133) 1.7± 0.5ab (103) 0.1 ± 0.1c (6)

Next Steps Establish physiological and behavioral state of responders to different stimuli. Combining attractive visual and olfactory stimuli. Improve monitoring tools. Develop attract and kill strategies.

Acknowledgements USDA-ARS, USDA NIFA SCRI # 2011-51181-30937, and USDA-APHIS BMSB SCRI Team and Working Group Doo-Hyung Lee Starker Wright Sean Wiles Brent Short John Cullum Jeanne Sullivan Cameron Scorza Brittany Rankin Teresa Mersing Torri Hancock Zoe Milburn