final report Herd Productivity

Similar documents
Weaner management. in northern beef herds. Russ Tyler Tyler rural consulting Gayndah. A joint initiative of:

Herd Management Method

Part 1 - Improving the performance of beef production systems in northern Australia

Section 5: Production Management

Your cattle need Rumensin

The profitability of increasing efficiency in the herd Brian Cumming. bcagriculture.com.au

ECONOMICS OF REDUCING METHANE EMISSIONS FROM CATTLE PRODUCTION IN CENTRAL QUEENSLAND

UNDER 16 MONTH BULL BEEF (SUCKLER)

Beef Cattle Handbook

for commercial breeders in Southern Australia

Backgrounding Calves Part 1: Assessing the Opportunity

Energy from forages and grain

Mulga your stock, your supplement with Clynt Johnstone

Custom Grazing. Lessons Learned

Building a fertile herd

The Value of Improving the Performance of your Cow-Calf Operation

The Effect of Winter Feed Levels on Steer Production

Cow/calf Management Winter and Spring

Level II Agricultural Business Operations - Assessment Booklet

Beef Cattle Management Update

Market specifications for beef cattle

Corn Silage for Beef Cattle

Fall Calving in North Dakota By Brian Kreft

Growing cattle fast on pasture

Northern Grazing Carbon Farming Integrating production and greenhouse gas outcomes

Emissions Reduction Fund Opportunities for cattle producers

A COMPARISON OF BEEF CATTLE BREEDING METHODS TO IMPROVE PERFORMANCE. D.G. Landblom and J.L. Nelson

BEEF PRODUCTION SYSTEM GUIDELINES. Animal & Grassland Research & Innovation Programme

FARMERS INFORMATION SERIES CONTINENTAL CATTLE. Management Guide. blade-farming.com

NIRS and Phosphorus testing a quality result

Beef Nutrition (Efficiency)

Formulating profitable rations

38 Trop Anim Prod :1

FARMERS INFORMATION SERIES ABERDEEN ANGUS. Management Guide. blade-farming.com

Monitoring Animal Performance For Maximum Profit

Angus Bull. Selecting your next

Selecting a Beef System by Pearse Kelly

Northern beef case study

Canfax Research Services A Division of the Canadian Cattlemen s Association

Livestock Enterprise. Budgets for Iowa 2016 File B1-21. Ag Decision Maker

How growth affects carcase and meat quality attributes

AGRICULTURAL ALTERNATIVES

Agricultural Science Past Exam Questions Animal Production Higher Level

Why Did We Change to June Calving?

Angus BREEDPLAN GETTING STARTED

On Farm Meeting Anawai

CHALLENGES FOR IMPROVING CALF CROP

STOCKTAKE REPORT 2016

How we feed our beef

INFLUENCE OF WEANING DATE (EARLY OR NORMAL) ON PERFORMANCE, HEALTH, AND CARCASS CHARACTERISTICS OF MAY BORN ANGUS CALVES

Comparison of Weaning System on Cow-Calf Performance and Intake

Introduction BEEF 140

Details. Note: This lesson plan addresses cow/calf operations. See following lesson plans for stockers and dairy operations.

Beef economics = Heifer management

Selection and Development of Heifers

White cottonseed a supplementary feed for beef cattle

STOCKTAKE REPORT 2015

Investigating New Marketing Options to Increase Beef Production in Ontario

27 July 2018 Dryland farming in New Zealand. Derek Daniell Masterton

Proceedings, The Range Beef Cow Symposium XX December 11, 12 and 13, 2007 Fort Collins, Colorado

Sustainability of Beef Cattle Systems in Uruguay. What type of sustainable system that we need to make focus?

Historical and practical aspects of profitability in commercial beef production. systems

Beef Industry. Reality. Cow Numbers England 759, ,000 6% Scotland 471, ,000 7% Northern Ireland 269, ,000 9%

Pasture Stick. Plate Meter. Estimating Dry Matter Intake. C-Dax Pasture Meter 3/31/2014

Developing a Practical Range Beef Improvement Program

Research in Beef Cattle Nutrition and Management

How does your herd perform?

Reproductive Management of Commercial Beef Cows. Ted G. Dyer, Extension Animal Scientist

Autumn AutumnGrazing Guide

England 759, ,000 6% Scotland 471, ,000 7% Northern Ireland 269, ,000 9% Wales 187, ,000 9%

Effects of Feeding Perennial Peanut Hay on Growth, Development, Attainment of Puberty, and Fertility in Beef Replacement Heifers

Western Canadian Cow-Calf Survey Findings: Production Benchmarks

April 1, 2009 David Baber Southern States Livestock Rep Mike Peacock Manager of Beef Feed Sales

BEEF COW/CALF ENTERPRISE BUDGET 2016 Estimated Costs and Returns - San Luis Valley

Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, Queensland. B. Keywords: profitability, greenhouse gas emissions, carbon sequestration

GUIDE TO ASSEMBLING DATA FOR COW-CALF

Supplemental Feeding of Beef Calves on Pasture

Making Livestock Decisions in Dry Times

Backgrounding Calves Part 2: Herd Health and Feeding

Teagasc Dairy Farm Walk

Determining Your Unit Costs of Producing A Hundred Weight of Calf

TIMELY INFORMATION. DAERS 08-4 August Making Adjustments To The Cattle Herd Due To Higher Production Costs

PERFORMANCE OF NURSING CALVES FED SUPPLEMENT WITH VARYING PROTEIN LEVELS. D. B. Faulkner and F. A. Ireland

SDSU. Effect of Calving Time and Weaning Time on Cow and Calf Performance - A Preliminary Report CATTLE 00-7

The importance of Water and Fibre

PUBLISHED BY Meat & Livestock Australia Limited Locked Bag 991 NORTH SYDNEY NSW 2059

The business of calf and heifer rearing

S. Aaron Smith, Michael P. Popp and Nathan Kemper. Executive Summary

Integration of Pasturing Systems for Cattle Finishing Programs: A Progress Report

Suckler beef systems assessing steps to improve profitability

Benchmark Angus. Engineering Superior Beef

Profitability of Tasmanian beef enterprises:

Modelling Greenhouse Gas Emissions Abatement Options for Beef and Sheep Farm Businesses

Opportunities and Challenges for Cow/Calf Producers 1. Rick Rasby Extension Beef Specialist University of Nebraska

ALFALFA FOR BEEF CATTLE

A Discussion Where We Have Been Where We Are Where We Are Going

PLEASURE WITH A CLEAR CONSCIENCE beef from the grasslands of the Baltic States Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania.

INTRODUCTION MARITIME PASTURE MANUAL 123

Proceedings, The Range Beef Cow Symposium XX December 11, 12 and 13, 2007 Fort Collins, Colorado WHY DID WE CHANGE TO JUNE CALVING?

Reducing the costs of beef production through the genetic improvement of net feed conversion efficiency

Transcription:

final report Project code: B.PRS.0405 / PIRD.04.Q01 Prepared by: Chris Ollson Mt Surprise Beef Group Date published: March 2007 ISBN: 9781741918700 PUBLISHED BY Meat & Livestock Australia Limited Locked Bag 991 NORTH SYDNEY NSW 2059 Herd Productivity Meat & Livestock Australia acknowledges the matching funds provided by the Australian Government to support the research and development detailed in this publication. This publication is published by Meat & Livestock Australia Limited ABN 39 081 678 364 (MLA). Care is taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this publication. However MLA cannot accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the information or opinions contained in the publication. You should make your own enquiries before making decisions concerning your interests. Reproduction in whole or in part of this publication is prohibited without prior written consent of MLA.

Contents Project Aims... 3 Background... 3 Main Outcomes:... 4 Feeding Results:... 4

Location: Mt Surprise district - Far North Queensland Producer Group: Doug and Mary Buchanan, Rocky Springs Mt Surprise Chris and Kim Ollson, Springfield Station Mt Surprise Alan and Ursula Gaynor, Springfield Mt Surprise Shane and Kim Gaynor, Gum Creek Croydon Ken and Fiona Atkinson, Glen Harding Mt Garnet Greg and Judy Brown, Meadowbank Mt Garnet Craig and Jade Buchanan, Forest Home Georgetown Charlie and Wilma Pointon, Yamnanie Mt Garnet Tom and Christine Saunders, Whitewater Mt Surprise Glen and Cheryl Connolly, Blancourt Georgetown Site Leader: Chris Ollson, Phone: 07 4062 3163 springfield1@bigpond.com.au Duration: 2004 2006 Project Aims To lift herd productivity in the North Queensland Dry Tropics using economically viable and environmentally sustainable management and feeding practices. Measure the supplementation costs and performance of cattle on producer group properties. Improve weight for age of sale cattle Background The typical North Queensland property runs a breeding herd to produce sale cattle for selling into a diverse market place. The more fertile the country the better weight for age animals are at turnoff. Supplementation with phosphorus over the wet season is widely used across northern Australia s tropics where needed to enhance animal performance. Protein based supplements are commonly used during the dry season. The main profit drivers of the northern breeding herd in order of importance is the branding rate, death rate and growth rate of sale cattle. Good herd and nutritional management is required if all profit drivers are to be addressed. To maintain a good branding rate and maximise weaner weights, most calves must be born before Christmas, which means that cows will often be calving during the October December period when pasture conditions are extremely dry, and standard dry season protein supplements will not prevent serious weight loss for the cow and poor performance for the new calf. Over the last 10 years high energy molasses supplements have become more popular first as a weaner feed and now for breeders during the dry season, especially when calving starts during October - December. This PIRD project aims to record the cost benefit of feeding molasses mixtures to specific groups of cattle and the impact on herd performance and profitability.

Main Outcomes Molasses based energy-protein mixtures will improve breeder performance and weaner live weight gain during the dry season. Good management should be used to feed these high cost supplements to specific groups of cattle to maximise economic returns. Cattle being fed these high energy-protein mixtures will consume more grass per day so stocking rates must be adjusted to available feed. Poor supply of paddock feed will dramatically lift molasses mixture feed intake levels and costs. Property needs good infructure and station service roads to enable molasses and other feed inputs to be mixed and distributed cost effectively. Adequate trough space is an important issue especially with young cattle. Feeding Results Springfield Station Molasses mixtures were first fed to the herd in the 2002 dry season. It is usual to begin feeding the mixtures in August and continue until the break of the season in November-December. Mixtures used Weaners under 150kg M3U Molasses 3% Urea 9% Copra meal 1% Salt 1% Kynofos 21 0.05% Rumensin 100 Breeders and weaners over 150kg M8U Molasses 8% Urea 1% Kynofos 21 0.05% Rumensin 100 Intake Levels Cows 1.5kg/day M8U Weaners over 150kg 2.5kg/day M8U Weaners under 150kg 2 kg/day M3U Performance: 2003 2004 Branding rate for herd 62% 70% Branding rate for 1 st calf heifers 44% 60% Weaner LWG/day Dry season 0.14kg Weaner LWG/day Wet season 0.6kg

Herd Performance Previous With M8U feeding Cattle numbers 8746 8795 Branding rate 62% 70% Death rate 6% 3% Female sales % total sales 42% 47% Female sale price $460 $471 Steer sale price $696 $698 Gross margin/adult equivalent $89 $117 In large northern herds where it s hard to keep tabs on cattle deaths, a good benchmark is to calculate the female sales as a percentage of total sales. As the table below indicates if this figure falls below 40% then the death rate is getting too high. Female Sales % Death Rate 48% 2-4% 44% 4-7% 38% 8-10% 32% 10-12% An important message that is coming through on Springfield and other properties feeding molasses mixtures, is that cattle performance is being lifted but animals are eating more grass per day. So that paddocks that safely carried 500 cows and calves, is now being eaten out as animals are eating more forage per day and stock numbers must be matched to available grass The Springfield management team is satisfied with the molasses feeding programme so far, as branding rates and weight for age of sale cattle have continued to improve despite the run of poor seasons. They have constructed a large molasses storage facility which will improve feeding efficiency into the future.

Meadowbank Station Large areas of Leucaena have been established through native pasture on this property. Sale cattle grazing Leucaena have double the annual live weight gain plus heavier stocking rates. Native Pasture Native Pasture plus Leucaena at 10m rows Stocking rate per adult equivalent 1-5/ha 1-3/ha Annual LWG 100-120kg 240-280kg This pasture system showed great promise in this district but with the new tree clearing restrictions across Queensland no new areas will be established because the native trees must be removed for the Leucaena to establish successfully. Molasses mixtures are used on this property every year for young weaners, but the owner was interested in maximising wet season live weight gain with his Leucaena pasture system. The steers averaged 378kg in September and all received a compudose 200 day. Both groups were on Leucaena-native pasture and the feeding went from October to March. LWG/day Plus molasses mix 1.1kg No supplement 0.93kg The extra weight gain, 0.17kg/day, only just paid for the extra supplement cost 22cents/head/day. Rocky Springs This station uses molasses mixtures for all weaners every year and for breeders who calve late in the wet season. The calves are usually under 60kg when the last muster is done in June. These cows and calves are drafted off into a separate paddock and fed molasses and 12% Urea (M12U) until December. The cow calf unit eats approximately 2.4kg of mix per day. In December the calf is weaned and the cow goes back into calf over the following wet season and has the next calf at the right time of the year. Glen Harding Some interesting figures from a mob of weaners which were weighed at branding and averaged 105kg. They stayed on the cow for another 180 days gaining 0.69kg per day and were 229kg average weight at weaning. The weaners were fed good hay and M3U mixture in the yards and lost an average of 1.38kg per day for 10 days. Weaners were then put into a good pasture and fed ad lib M4U and when they were weighed 49 days later they were back up to 266kg a 1.04kg per day LWG.

Yammanie Sale cattle were grazed in a good paddock and fed a brew of Molasses + 8% Urea + 1% Kynofos all year. This mixture in 2004 cost $205/t LWG/day Feed cost/head/day November 2003 April 2004 0.62kg $0.13 May 2004 July 2004 0.69kg $0.14 August 2004 September 2004 0.33kg $0.18 October 2004 November 2004 0.24kg $0.20 Fat cattle were sold in November 2004 when finished cattle are in short supply and prices usually at their best. Blancourt The Manager had been feeding molasses-urea mixtures to his weaners for many years and averaging approximately 0.25kg/day live weight gain. The weaners were fed over the usual northern dry season of June to December. For this last season sorghum silage has been home grown for feeding to weaners and sale cattle. The feed mixture has been whole cotton seed, molasses and silage and animal performance is over 1kg /day weight gain. This extra weight gain has allowed this owner to sell better weight for age cattle and access new marketing outlets, and he plans to continue his silage feeding programme. Forest Home This property has also grown sorghum silage at home for feeding to young cattle. The ration was also based on silage and whole cotton seed, costing approximately $190/t (dry matter basis). Steer Weight Ration daily Cost feed intake D.M. head/day LWG/day Cost/kg gain 200kg 4.4kg $0.836 0.8kg $1.04 400kg 8.8kg $1.672 1.1kg $1.52 As the figures above show, the lighter animal uses the feed more efficiently and has a cheaper cost per kg gain, but final selling price per kg will determine the profitability of the exercise.