Comparative study of new energy crops for the production of biogas

Similar documents
Reduction of microorganisms in thermophilic process of anaerobic digestion of cattle manure

ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS IN CULTIVATION OF PAULOWNIA IN BULGARIA. Avgusta STEPCHICH. Abstract

MICROBIOLOGICAL EVALUATION OF SEWAGE SLUDGE IN TERMS OF POSSIBILITY OF APPLICATIONS IN SOIL AS A FERTILIZER

Miscanthus biomass options for contaminated and marginal land: quality, quantity and soil interactions

Key benefits of compost use for the soil-plant system

Towards understanding complex agricultural systems with soil-test biological activity

An overview of integrated farming systems Manure treatment options

Agricultural and Biological Engineering. Biological Manipulation of Manure: Getting What You Want from Animal Manure

Highlights of socio-economic impacts from biogas in 28 target regions

Influence of Age at First Calving on Milk Quantity at Holstein-Friesian Cows

12693/15 LS/dd 1 DGB 1B

PHOSPHORUS AND POTASSIUM REMOVAL ASSESSMENT IN OMITTED PLOT TRIALS WITH WHEAT AND BARLEY

NUTRIENT CONTENT OF SOME LOCALLY AVAILABLE ORGANIC MATERIALS AND THEIR POTENTIAL AS ALTERNATIVE SOURCES OF NUTRIENTS FOR COCONUT

ABE 482 Environmental Engineering in Biosystems. September 22 Lecture 8

Microbiological evaluation of sewage sludge in terms of possibilities of application in soil as a fertilizer

Natural fertiliser control and application system in Poland state of the art. The natural manure composition in Poland estimating and verification

Figure 1. Schematic overview of biomass input flow to New Substrate Technology Concept and resulting products.

UNIT 5. Biomass energy

Environmental Constraints to Milk Production and Regulation CA Perspective. Ermias Kebreab University of California, Davis. San Diego, May 3, 2017

Unit 3: Matter & Energy Flow on Earth

PETROVA VERA ZAMFIROVA

Groot Zevert Vergisting (Beltrum, NL)

Agriculture and Greenhouse Gas Mitigation: Who, What, How, Where and When?

Advanced Biology: Bahe & Deken. Agriculture & Nutrition. Chapter 9. Text Page

Biomethane development and the decarbonisation strategy in Italy

What is ManureEcoMine? The project, its challenges and objectives

PROSPECTS FOR THE USE OF AGRICULTURAL RESIDUES FOR ENERGY PRODUCTION IN UKRAINE

PROJECT DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE

Nitrogen Availability from Manipulated Manures

The organizations and companies dealing with sericulture development in Bulgaria are the Sericulture Experiment Station in Vratza, Agricultural

Presented by: USA Biogas

What is the Greenhouse Gas Contribution from Agriculture in Alberta?

NUTRITION VALUE OF TWO GRAIN COMMON WHEAT

Agriculture in a bioeconomy What-to & How-to? Claus Felby, University of Copenhagen

Organica is a registered trademark of the Keter Group Energy Division.

Managing nutrient needs in organic farming. Judith Nyiraneza

Bio-waste Key elements of the EU framework legislation

Requirements for characterization of biorefinery residues

Pantelopoulos A., Magid J., Jensen L.S. Faculty of Science Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences University of Copenhagen

Anaerobic Digestion not just biogas production. FARM BIOGAS Methane consulting cc

14 th Lecture Biogas and Biohydrogen

Recommended Resources: The following resources may be useful in teaching

jf,

Closing the nutrient loop

Turning chicken litter to bioenergy and recycling nutrients. Dr. Ilkka Virkajärvi, Ductor Corp.

BIOMETHANE DIGESTATE FROM HORSE MANURE, A NEW WASTE USABLE IN COMPOST FOR GROWING THE BUTTON MUSHROOM, AGARICUS BISPORUS?

Livestock waste to biogas: the Italian BiogasDoneRight model

Animal productions in food and nutrition security

The Effects of Hog Waste on the Environment

Biogas research in Teagasc Grange

Closing the Phosphorus (P) cycle and manure processing

MATERIAL RECYCLING AND BIOLOGICAL WASTE TREATMENT FOR BIOGAS AND NUTRIENT RECOVERY Important parts in a CO2 smart and circular economy

Solid Biomass and Biogas in Danube Basin Potentials, Outlooks and R&D Needs, Case Serbia

Biogas Production from Lignocellulosic Biomass

USDA GLOBAL CHANGE FACT SHEET

Quantifying Emissions of Ammonia For Air Quality Analysis

Multifunctional production of biomass for the bio-based economy. Erik Steen Jensen Biosystems and Technology LTJ Faculty

Feed Industry Perspective on EU Protein Production Nick Major FEFAC President

Linear Programming-Based Optimization of Synthetic Fertilizers Formulation

Organic products from field to shelf

Nitrogen mangement for organic potatoes. Dan M. Sullivan Soil Scientist Oregon State University Corvallis, OR

Concept of Organic Farming S S R A N A S R S C I E N T I S T

OPTIONS FOR REDUCTION OF MAIZE SILAGE IN BIOGAS PLANT DRAZENCI

jf, FiBL, CH-Frick 1

/05. sustainability. of the production chain. From biodegradability. to the second life of. Mater-Bi: our fundamental. concepts for.

Effects of 45-years mineral fertilization on mobile potassium content in the Pellic Vertisols

GALEGA BIOMASS FOR BIOGAS PRODUCTION

CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF DIGESTATE

Welcome to the Web Conference U.S. Dairy Industry s Report National Market Value of Anaerobic Digester Products April 11, 2013

Manure-DNDC: Building a Process-Based Biogeochemical Tool for Estimating Ammonia and GHG Emissions from California Dairies

UDC :

STUDY OF THE INFLUENCE OF THE FODDER, CULTIVATED WITH THE USE OF ORGANIC AND MINERAL FERTILIZERS, ON THE BODY MASS OF RABBITS

Nutrient Management Act, 2002 ONTARIO REGULATION 267/03 GENERAL LAWS.GOV.ON.CA/HTML/REGS/ENGLISH/ELAWS_REGS_030267_E.

Biogas Installations for CEE Markets Solar & Benefit International / Solar & Benefit Bulgaria May 2013

BIOPLASTICS & Biodegradibility Questions & Answers

THE INFLUENCE OF MINERAL AND ORGANIC FERTILIZERS ON SOIL, FODDER PLANTS AND QUALITY OF CHICKEN MEAT

Selection of Robinia pseudoacacia var. monophylla for increased feeding value in the Mediterranean environment

Comparing Water Extractable Phosphorus (WEP) from Various Organic Amendments

INTERACTION OF THE TECHNOLOGICAL PROPERTIES OF COMMON WINTER WHEAT VARIETIES WITH SOME AGRONOMY FACTORS

Reducing the carbon footprint of coffee production through improved fertilizer management. Katharina Plassmann

Verification report New Substrate Technology Concept

International Journal of Science, Environment and Technology, Vol. 6, No 3, 2017,

GCE Environmental Technology. Energy from Biomass. For first teaching from September 2013 For first award in Summer 2014

Many systems are. Manure Utilization and Treatment Technologies Land application

Anaerobic Digestion of Biowaste An Ecosanitation Solution for Developing Countries. Reginald TOUSSAINT July

Grass silage for biorefinery A meta-analysis of silage factors affecting liquid-solid separation

Schmack Biogas (Viessmann Group) Comprehensive supplier of biogas technology

Permanent grasslands in Europe

IMPROVING THE BIOGAS APPLICATION IN THE MEKONG DELTA OF VIETNAM BY USING AGRICULTURAL WASTE AS AN ADDITIONAL INPUT MATERIAL

Vermont Tech Community Anaerobic Digester! Harvesting renewable energy & recycling nutrients for a more sustainable community

Accounting for plant-available nitrogen from cover crops in vegetable production systems

Optimized recovery of organic waste

Production from Organic Residues. Biogas

Factors Affecting the Performances of Biomass Anaerobic Digestion Process

The natural manure composition in Poland estimating and verification

Class IX Chapter 15 Improvement in Food Resources Science


Recycling urban organic waste to agriculture and horticulture

Potential options for mitigation of climate change from agriculture. Agustin del Prado

Emerging Paradigms in Biosolids Management. Dr Bill Barber 15 th February 2013

Transcription:

ISSN: 2319-7706 Volume 3 Number 11 (2014) pp. 181-188 http://www.ijcmas.com Original Research Article Comparative study of new energy crops for the production of biogas Veselin Kirov 1*, Zaprianka Shindarska 1, Gergana Kostadinova 3, Adelina Gencheva 2, Stojan Hadgiev 3, Toncho Penev 4 and Bayko Baykov 1 1 University of Forestry, 10, St.Kl.Ochridsky Blvd., 1756 Sofia, Bulgaria 2 New Bulgarian University, h.c. Ovcha Kupel, St. Montevideo 21, 1618 Sofia, Bulgaria 3 Trakia University, Faculty of Agriculture, Student Campus, 6000 Stara Zagora, Bulgaria 4 Department of Applied Ecology and Animal Hygiene, Faculty of Agriculture, Trakia University, 6000 Stara Zagora, Bulgaria *Corresponding author email: A B S T R A C T K e y w o r d s Biogas, Energy plants (crops), Biogas, Methane. comparative study of new energy crops has been conducted. Its aim was to give a comparative assessment of the main technological parameters for biogas production. Samples of the following energy crops were examined: four species of Paulownia hybrid, Shan Tong, Kawakamii and Elungata, Willow, Miscanthus and Arundo. The examined energy crops have optimum values of the main technological parameters in the production of biogas/dry matter, organic matter, carbon, nitrogen and the C:N ratio. Introduction In recent years it has become clear that alternative energy crops are required for the production of biogas (Mueller et al., 2001; Shindarska et al., 2012; Baykov et al., 2005; Arsova, 2010, Dimitrova et al., 2009, Zaharinov et al., 2012). The aim is to preserve the soil through crop rotation. With proper combination of crops and providing sowing cycle, the use of mineral fertilizers is reduced, which increases the cost efficiency of the biogas production. The use of new (and little known in Bulgaria and in the rest of Europe) energy crops is one solution due to the provision of raw materials for biofuel and achieving ecological balance. In previous studies we examined the most common species of the energy crop Paulownia Elungata (Shindarska et al., 2013). Our aim with the current study is to analyze 4 different species of Paulownia, along with willow, arundo and miscanthus in terms of their composition and technological parameters for the production of biogas. 181

Materials and Methods Samples were taken from the following species of Paulownia: Paulownia (hybrid), Shan Tong, Kawakamii and Elungata. All these belong to the genus Paulownia and are widespread in Asia, especially in China. The leaves are rich in sugars, fats and protein; in terms of nutritional value they are similar to alfalfa. The reason for them not to be used as animal feed, is the high lignin content and in some species the high content of alkaloids. After the leaves fall from the trees, they fertilize the soil, enrich it with nitrogen and improve its structure. Description of energy crops in Table 1. Table.1 Energy crops S.No. Types of plant substrates 1. Paulownia /hybrid/ leaves 2. Paulownia Shantong /leaves 3. Paulownia Kawakamii /leaves 4. Paulownia Elungata /leaves 5. Willow /leaves + branches 6. Arundo 7. Miscanthus The following models of analysis were used: Dry matter (DM) by BSS (Bulgarian State Standard) EN 14346, Organic matter (OM) and Organic carbon (OC) by BSS EN 13137, Nitrogen by Kjeldahl (N) by BSS 13342, N-ammonium by BSS 3587, N- nitrate by BSS EN ISO 10304-2, (SO 4 ) by BSS EN ISO 10304-2, (CaO) by EPA 6010C, (MgO) by EPA 6010C, (K) by EPA 6010C, (P) by EPA 6010C, ph (H 2 O) by BSS EN 12176. Results and Discussion The technological indicators characterizing the production of biofuel are shown in Table 2. Of the studied energy crops, willow and miscanthus have the highest (almost equal) values of dry matter (DM) (Fig. 1) 43.39 and 43.10% respectively, while Paulownia Elungata has the lowest value (25.52%). Of the four species of Paulownia the hybrid has the highest DM value. The differences between the remaining three species are from 1 1.5%. The DM data correspond to those for the Organic matter (OM) where willow and miscanthus have the highest values, while Paulownia Shan Tong has the lowest OM content (Fig. 2). With respect to carbon, Paulownia Elungata has the highest content (Fig. 3) 43.68%, while Paulownia hybrid has the lowest 32.70%. In terms of carbon content, willow and miscanthus have almost identical values. In terms of nitrogen content Paulownia hybrid contains 2.85%, followed by willow. Nitrogen content is the lowest in miscanthus (Fig. 4). The examined energy crops are in the most optimal range of the C:N ratio, where it is widest in miscanthus and most optimal in arundo (Fig. 5). The ph values are close for all the studied energy crops and are in the range between 5.10 and 5.63 (Fig. 6). With regards to the three nitrogen forms relevant to soil fertility, ammonium nitrogen has the highest values (Fig. 7) (Table 3). The nitrite and nitrate nitrogen forms are below the admissible limits in all examined crops. The amount of ammonium nitrogen from the total nitrogen content is highest in arundo. Of the four species of Paulownia, the ammonium nitrogen content is highest in Paulownia Elungata. It is worth noting the low values of ammonium nitrogen from the total nitrogen in Paulownia hybrid. With respect to potassium content (Fig. 8) arundo has the highest content, while Paulownia Shan Tong has the lowest content (1.16%). The phosphorus content (Fig. 9) in the examined energy crops is between 0.33 0.16%. 182

Table.2 Content of the energy crops DM % OM % % N % C:N ph 1 30,92±1,23 20,52±0,19 32,70±1,15 2,85±0,09 11,47 5,31±0,17 2 26,30±1,34 14,69±0,15 35,89±1,23 2,10±0,11 17,09 5,63±0,24 3 27,00±1,09 16,20±0,98 40,10±2,04 1,88±0,07 21,33 5,52±0,07 4 25,52±2,01 16,24±0,56 43,68±2,15 2,74±0,13 15,83 5,46±0,15 5 43,39±2,09 38,33±1,01 39,07±1,18 1,37±0,04 28,52 5,21±0,07 6 34,89±1,88 19,84±0,97 33,27±2,04 1,57±0,05 21,19 5,10±0,09 7 43,10±2,12 36,68±1,12 39,81±1,19 0,98±0,03 40,69 5,44±0,12 Table.3 Biogenic macroelements content in energy crops Indicators Nitrogen fractions, K, P, mg/kg % % ammonium nitrite nitrate 1. 73,40 <5 <5 2,25 0,29 2. 60,11 <5 <5 1,16 0,21 3. 60,50 <5 <5 1,27 0,33 4. 1744 <5 <5 1,26 0,21 5. 1325 <5 <5 1,13 0,16 6. 5247 <5 <5 2,29 0,20 7. 657 <5 <5 1,53 0,17 Fig.1 Content of dry matter (DM) 183

Fig.2 Content of organic matter (OM) Fig.3 Content of carbon 184

Fig.4 Content of nitrogen Fig.5 Range of the C:N ratio 185

Fig.6 Values of ph in the energy crops Fig.7 Nitrogen fractions ammonium mg/kg 186

Fig.8 Content of potassium Fig.9 Content of nitrogen phosphorus References Arsova, L. 2010. Anaerobic digestion of food waste: Current status, problems and an alternative product. M.S. Degree Thesis, Department of Earth and Environmental Engineering, Columbia University, USA, Pp. 35 74. Baykov, B., Popova, J., Zaharinov, B., Kirov, K., Simeonov, I. 2005. Assement of the compost from the 187

methane fermentation of litter from broiler production with a view to its utilization in organic plant, ISAH, Warsaw, Poland, vol. 2, Pp. 69 72. Dimitrova D, Cherijska, Iv., Marinova- Garvanska, Sv., Kolev, N. 2009. Potencial for biogas production in Bulgaria, Biogas for Eastern Europe. Mueller, J.P., Luginbuhl, J.M., Bergmann, B.A. 2001. Establishment and early growth characteristics of six Paulownia genotypes for goat brouse in Raleigh, NC, USA, Agroforestry Syst., 52: 62 72. Shindarska, Z., Kirov, V., Popova, T., Baykov, B. 2013. New materials for biogas production in livestock farms in Bulgaria, XVIth International Congress on Animal Hygiene, China (in press). Shindarska, Z., Loutskanova, O., Baykov, B. 2012. Evaluation of new raw materials for production on biogas, J. Balkan Ecol., 2: 197 201. Zaharinov, B. 2012. Biomass, biogas, compost in energy of athropogenic ecosystems, NBU, Sofia, P. 559. 188