Animal and Forage Interactions in Beef Systems

Similar documents
Forage and Livestock Management Considerations

Forage and Livestock Management Considerations

MATCHING FORAGES WITH LIVESTOCK NEEDS

Intensified Cow/Calf Production Systems in the Southern Great Plains

Classes of Livestock. Numbers to Remember. Crude Protein. Nutrition for the Cow-calf. Factors influencing Requirements

The Value of Improving the Performance of your Cow-Calf Operation

Ranch Tools: Grazing and Hay Records

Relationship of Cow Size, Requirements, and Production Issues. Dr. Matt Hersom UF/IFAS Department of Animal Sciences

9/3/11. Joplin/newsroom.html. Implications of nutritional management for beef cow/calf systems

Beef Cattle Management Update

Beef Cattle Handbook

Measuring Cow Efficiency in the Herd. Ryon S. Walker Livestock Consultant Noble Research Institute

FORAGE SYSTEMS TO REDUCE THE WINTER FEEDING PERIOD. Gerald W. Evers

CHALLENGES FOR IMPROVING CALF CROP

Matching Calving Date With Forage Nutrients: Production and Economic Impacts

2013 Georgia Grazing School:

Grazing Management Different Strategies. Dr Jim Russell and Joe Sellers Iowa State University

Management and Supplementation Strategies to Improve Reproduction of Beef Cattle on Fescue. John B. Hall Extension Beef Specialist Virginia Tech

Using Confinement as a Component in Beef Production Systems. Karla H. Jenkins, Shelby Gardine, Jason Warner, Terry Klopfenstein, Rick Rasby

Background and Assumptions

Reproduction is the single most important factor associated with the economic success of the cow/calf producer

Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle

A Discussion Where We Have Been Where We Are Where We Are Going

GUIDE TO ASSEMBLING DATA FOR COW-CALF

Cow/calf Management Winter and Spring

S. Aaron Smith, Michael P. Popp and Nathan Kemper. Executive Summary

Central Texas Cow/Calf Clinic

Developing strategy - Protein

Nutrition (young/old) - Cattle Score (male/female)

Cattle Outlook. January, 2018

Situation Analysis. Kathleen R. Brooks, Ph.D. Extension Livestock Economics Specialist

Backgrounding Calves Part 1: Assessing the Opportunity

Economics Associated with Beef Cattle Ranching. Larry Forero UC Cooperative Extension April 21, 2016

Increase Profit: Feeding Cows by Body Condition and Production Potential

Proceedings, The Range Beef Cow Symposium XX December 11, 12 and 13, 2007 Fort Collins, Colorado

Forage Systems for Dairy Grazing. Robert Kallenbach University of Missouri

Background and Assumptions

The Optimal Cow Size for Intermountain Cow- Calf Operations: The Impact of Public Grazing Fees on the Optimal Cow Size

TIMELY INFORMATION. DAERS 08-4 August Making Adjustments To The Cattle Herd Due To Higher Production Costs

Relationship of Cow Size to Nutrient Requirements and Production Management Issues 1

ALFALFA FOR BEEF CATTLE

Background and Assumptions

Heifer Economics. Geoff Benson, PhD Extension Economist NCSU

Benefits of Raising Heifers on Pasture

Got Milk? An Economic Look at Cow Size and Milk. July 13 th, 2015

Comparison of Weaning System on Cow-Calf Performance and Intake

California Forage Quality From Grass to Poop

Heifer rearing cost: Critical control points

Background and Assumptions

Drought Arithmetic for Cowboys

co-products ethanol for cattle Distillers Grains for Beef Cows

Section 5: Production Management

Agriculture & Business Management Notes...

Defining Value and Requirements in Cow Rations: What is a Calorie Worth?

Fall Calving in North Dakota By Brian Kreft

Calving Month Feed Budget Relative Cost

BEEF COW/CALF ENTERPRISE BUDGET 2016 Estimated Costs and Returns - San Luis Valley

AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF. EUGENE DUANE PANASUK for the MASTER OF SCIENCE (Name) (Degree)

Balancing Forage Demand with Forage Supply

What Hay Is Right For Your Livestock. Tom Gallagher Capital Area Agriculture Horticulture Program Livestock Specialist

OSU CowCulator. A Tool for Evaluating Beef Cow Diets. Instructions for Use 1. Oregon State University. Beef Cattle Sciences. Introduction BEEF108

Managing Beef Cow Efficiency 1

The Modern Range Cow has Greater Nutrient Demand than the Old Style Range Cow

Relationship of Cow Size, Cow Requirements, and Production Issues

PLANNING A HORIZONTAL SILO FOR BEEF OPERATIONS

Emmit L. Rawls Professor Agricultural Economics

Raising the Bar on Calf & Heifer Feeding & Management. Jim Barmore, M.Sc., PAS Nutrition & Management Consulting Verona, WI

Forage Seminar Cut Bank, MT - December 16, 2014

Dairy Outlook Midwest & Great Plains Outlook Conference. Katelyn McCullock Dairy & Forage Economist Livestock Marketing Information Center

Profit = Income - Costs. Profit = Income - Costs. What are overhead costs? Estimated average cow costs What are variable costs?

LAND & LIVESTOCK Blaine E. Horn, Ph.D., CPRM University Senior Extension Educator Rangeland & Forage Management

Calving Pattern- The Most Important Decision on Your Farm?

Relationship of Cow Size, Cow Requirements, and Production Issues

District 11-Projected Cow-Calf Enterprise Budget Breeding Cow Herd on Improved Pasture

1.Greenfield Dairy Farm Fact Sheet week ending 2-Sept Aug 26-Aug 2-Sept Cumulative

EC Estimating the Most Profitable Use of Center-Pivot Irrigation for a Ranch

Utilizing Coproducts in the Grazing Program

Comparison of target breeding weight and breeding date for replacement beef heifers and effects on subsequent reproduction and calf performance 1

FEED EFFICIENCY IN THE RANGE BEEF COW: WHAT SHOULD WE BE LOOKING AT?

Intro to Livestock Marketing Annie s Project. Tim Petry Livestock Economist 2018

Pasture Monitoring. Charles Fletcher Edgewood Dairy Purdy, Missouri

NO!!! Making the Most of Winter Forages. Replacements are Up, Cow Slaughter is Down. The Profit Equation Variables. Hay Ground is Disappearing

Valuing Soil Health Benefits for WY Ranchers. Holly Dyer John Ritten John Tanaka David Taylor Kristie Maczko Jennifer Moore-Kucera

Grazing Economics 101 Keys to Being a Profitable Forage Producer MODNR-SWCP Mark Kennedy and John Turner

Effects of Feeding Perennial Peanut Hay on Growth, Development, Attainment of Puberty, and Fertility in Beef Replacement Heifers

Nancy Cameron Chair Update: 2018 Montana Nutrition Conference & Livestock Forum

INTENSIFIED COW/CALF PRODUCTION IN THE SOUTHERN GREAT PLAINS

Reducing cow wintering cost grazing stockpiled grass and crop residues

SUPPLEMENTAL PROTEIN LEVELS FOR SPRING CALVING COWS GRAZING OLD WORLD BLUESTEM OR TALLGRASS PRAIRIE

Crunching the Numbers for Taxes and Analysis. Chris Prevatt University of Florida, Range Cattle REC Extension Economist

Winter Cow Feeding Strategies. Why is this Important?

Pasture Management for Western North Dakota Project No Complementary Rotation Grazing System in Western North Dakota

Factors Affecting Timing and Intensity of Calving Season of Beef Cow-Calf Producers in the Midwest

A GRAZING AND HAYING SYSTEM WITH WINTER ANNUAL GRASSES. Steve Orloff and Dan Drake 1 ABSTRACT

Weekly Mature U.S. Beef Cow Slaughter

2014 Forage GCA Convention Forage Systems for Extending the Grazing Season

Effects of Supplemental Undegradable Protein on the Performance of Fall-Calving Cows Grazing Dormant Native Range

Beef Cattle Nutrition Fast Start Training Dec. 11, Overview U.S. Beef Cattle Numbers. Industry Segments U.S.

Proceedings, State of Beef Conference November 7 and 8, 2018, North Platte, Nebraska COW SIZE AND COWHERD EFFICIENCY. Introduction

Prescribed Grazing Plan

Transcription:

Planning and Managing for Dry Conditions in Range and Pasture Production Systems Don Adams dadams1@unl.edu Animal and Forage Interactions in Beef Systems 1

Diets of Grazing Cattle The Primary Factor Affecting Nutrient Content of Grazed Diets is Plant Maturity 2

14 Crude Protein in Cattle Diets on Sandhills Range 12 1 8 6 4 2 APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB Month 8 In vitro Organic Matter Digestibility (IVOMD, % OM) of Cattle Diets on Sandhills Range 7 6 5 IVOMD, % 4 3 2 1 APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB Month 3

Nutrient Requirements of the Cow Net Energy (NE) Requirements for a 12 lb March Calving Cow with 23 lbs/day Peak Milk Production 2 NE (Mcal/day) 15 1 5 Calve 3 5 Wean 9 11 Months After Calving NRC (1996) 4

Forage Intake Needed to Provide Protein Required for Pregnancy and Milk (12 Pound Cow) 8 12% 8% 4% Forage lb/day 6 4 2 Mid 1/3 pregnancy Last 1/3 pregnancy 1 lb milk/day 2 lb milk/day Physiological Status of the Cow 5

g/kg BW Rumen Volume and Dry Matter Fill of Steers Grazing Sandhills Meadow and Range 16 14 12 1 8 6 4 2 Rumen Volume Dry Matter Fill Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Dec Nebraska Ranch Practicum Forage Organic Matter Intake and Particulate Passage Observed Using Steers Grazing Sandhills Meadow or Range 25 2 15 1 5 Organic Matter Intake g/kg BW Particulate Passage %/hr Meadow Range Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Dec Nebraska Ranch Practicum 6

Lactation and Nutrient Content of Forages Forage Intake Needed To Provide Protein Required for Pregnancy And Milk (12 Pound Cow) 8 12% 8% 4% Forage lb/day 6 4 2 Mid 1/3 pregnancy Last 1/3 pregnancy 1 lb milk/day 2 lb milk/day Physiological Status of the Cow g/kg BW 16 14 12 1 8 6 4 2 Rumen Volume and Dry Matter Fill of Steers Grazing Sandhills Meadow and Range Rumen Volume Dry Matter Fill Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Dec Forage Organic Matter Intake and Particulate Passage Observed Using Steers Grazing Sandhills Meadow or Range 25 2 15 1 5 Organic Matter Intake g/kg BW Particulate Passage %/hr Meadow Range Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Dec Effect of Precipitation Level on Forage and Cattle at the Gudmundsen Sandhills Laboratory (24-214) Source: Nebraska Ranch Practicum 7

3 Year Average (1985 215) Monthly Precipitation Levels At GSL January.32 February.43 March.66 April 2.5 May 3.9 June 3.66 July 2.95 August 2.17 September 1.72 October 1.18 November.52 December.18 Annual 18.93 April, May, June Precipitation in Dry, Average and Wet Years Dry Years 212 3.4 24 5.5 22 5.8 26 5.9 23 6.6 Average Years 21 8. 28 8.2 2 8.9 213 9.2 27 1.6 Wet Years 214 12.4 25 12.6 211 12.9 21 13. 29 14.7 8

Precipitation Level on Crude Protein (CP) CP, % 2 15 1 5 June July Sept Nov Dec Month DRY AVG WET Precipitation Level on TDN TDN, % 8 7 6 5 4 3 June July Sept Nov Dec Month DRY AVG WET 9

Precipitation Level on Cow BW Cow BW, kg 55 5 45 4 35 3 June July Sept Nov Jan Month DRY AVG.5 < P.1 P <.1 Precipitation Level on Cow BCS Cow BCS 5.6 5.4 5.2 5 4.8 4.6 P <.1 June July Sept Nov Jan Month 1

Precipitation Level on Milk Production Milk production, kg 8 6 4 2 June July Sept Nov Month P <.5 DRY AVG WET Precipitation Level on Pregnancy Rate Pregnancy rate, % 1 8 6 4 2 DRY AVG WET Precipitation Level P =.95 11

Precipitation Level on Calf BW Calf BW, kg 25 2 15 1 5 June July Sept Nov Month P.1 DRY AVG WET Weaning Date on Cow BW Cow BW, kg 6 5 4 3 2 June July Sept Nov Jan Month P.1 Sept Nov 12

Weaning Date on Cow BCS Cow BCS 6 5.5 5 4.5 4 June July Sept Nov Month Jan P <.1 Sept Nov Managing During Drought 13

Precipitation Level on CP CP, % 2 15 1 5 June July Sept Nov Dec Month DRY AVG WET Crude Protein Content of Cattle Diets on Sandhills Range Date Average 22 June 7 th 12.3 12.7 July 16 th 11. 8.2 July 3 th 1.3 5.9 August 2 th 9.3 5.6 September 5 th 8.6 7.5 October 14 th 6.7 5.9 14

Precipitation Level on TDN TDN, % 8 7 6 5 4 3 June July Sept Nov Dec Month DRY AVG WET TDN Content of Cattle Diets on Sandhills Range Date Average 22 June 7 th 69 53 July 16 th 63 49 July 3 th 6 5 August 2 th 57 49 September 5 56 48 October 54 48 15

Amount of Milk Produced by the. Cow Milk Production by Cows With High and Low Production During Summer Grazing Daily milk production, lbs 25 2 15 1 Low High 5 May 28 June 18 Aug 1 Sept 14 Adams et al. 1993 16

Body Condition Score Change for Cows With High or Low Milk Production During Summer Grazing 1 Body condition score change.5 (.5) Low High (1) April 1 On grass June 19 Beginning breeding Aug 5 End breeding Sept 2 Weaning Weight Gain of Calves From Cows With High or Low Milk Production During Summer Grazing 4 High Calf gain, lbs 3 2 Low 1 April 1 June 19 Aug 5 Sept 2 Weaning 17

CRUDE PROTEIN IN THE DIETS OF SUCKLING CALVES AND MATURE STEERS ON MONTANA RANGE Date Suckling Calves Mature Steers June 13 13.1 9.1 July 26 9.7 6.1 September 2 6.4 4.1 November 28 3.4 3.1 Crude protein and digestibility of cow and calf diets on Sandhills Range Crude Protein 1 Organic Matter Digestibility Date Cow Calf Cow Calf June 9.7 13.7 6.8 59.5 July 11. 14. 63.5 61.3 August 11.1 11.9 57.8 56.8 September 7.7 9.4 5.7 54.6 1 Crude protein expressed on organic matter basis 18

Early Planning gives more Flexibility Conserving Grazed Forages 19

Plan Expected days of grazing vs. Needed days of grazing Adjustments to attain needed days of grazing: Weaning Culling Marketing Supplements Purchased Feed and/or Grazing Weaning 2

Weaning the calf early saves grazed forage when the calf is fed harvested feeds or is moved off of the ranch. Forage organic matter intake (lb/day) by cows and calves grazing Sandhills range Total Date Cow 1 Calf (Cow + Calf) July 1991 26.1 5.9 32. September 1991 24.3 6.4 3.7 July 1992 27. 4. 31. 1 Average body weight of cows for 1991 = 197 lb; for 1992 = 1139 lb 21

About 1 pounds of forage is conserved for each day a calf is weaned (1 lbs forage =.4 day grazing for a dry cow) Weaning Primary Impacts of Drought 1. Lower forage production 2. Lower diet nutrients 22

Crop Residue Concerns 1)Nitrates 2)Poisonous Plants 23

22 Drought Actions taken by University at the Gudmundsen Sandhills Ranch 1. Kept inventory current culls sold as identified 15 cows for 1 month = 18 aums 2. Identified 15 cows in May as culls and sold them in June as pairs instead of at weaning. 15 cows off ranch for 5 months = 113 aums 3. Weaned March born in early Sept. 1 month early. 3 calves off ranch 1 mo = 12 aums 4. Steer calves shipped within 1 days of weaning (included in 3) 24

Actions (continued) 5. Surplus heifer calves sold 3 weeks after weaning (2 mo. Early) = 24 aums 6. Reduced March herd 5% (15 cows) and sold remaining open/culls in Sept. a) 3 fewer cows due to June sales and the 15 reduction for 9 mos (Sept. thru May) = 324 aums b) 2 open cows sold in Sept. (2 mos. Early) = 48 aums Actions (continued) 7. 11 cows to corn stalks in early November to late February = 475 aums 8. 25 pregnant June calving cows sold in January rather than April as normal = 75 aums saved 9. TOTAL AUMs SAVED FOR COWS = 1197 or 58 days for 52 cows 25

Actions (continued) 1. Projected savings in hay = 14 tons or about 18 days for the entire herd. 11. TOTAL COW DAYS OF FEED SAVED FOR 52 COW HERD = 58 (grazing) + 18 (hay) = 76 Days Implement Plan Early 26