Meeting employer s expecations on employability competencies of higher education graduates A. Līce, T. Volkova, A. Zvaigzne
Research questions & methodology What expectations do employers have of higher education in Latvia regarding employability competencies? (based on CareerEDGE model by Pool et al., 2014) What are the activities employers are willing to be involved to enhance employability of graduates? What support is needed from HEIs for employers to get involved? How to improve higher education quality assurance system to better achieve employers expectations? Electronic questionnaire to 87 employer representatives which were in the QA experts database of the Employers Confederation of Latvia (LDDK), 40% response rate.
Results
Importance How to interpret IPA Matrix (Martilla & James, 1977) I = P (Bacon, 2003) I > P Performance
Importance 5.5 5.0 4.5 8 4 13 6 1 7 2 15 16 10 18 123 Largest mean gaps: Ability to adapt Responsibility for own decisions Attitude towards work and colleagues Work motivation 4.0 3.5 17 11 14 9 5 All included in the Emotional Competence Framework by Goleman, 1998. 3.0 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 Performance 1 - Adaptability 2 - Communication skills 3 - Generate new ideas 4 - Responsibility for own decisions 5 - Presentation skills 6 - Independent work 7 - Team work 8 - Attitude towards work and colleagues 9 - Achievements in education 10 - Good planning and organizing skills 11 - Clarity about career objectives 12 - Goal orientation 13 - Work motivation 14 - Mathematical skills 15 - Problem solving skills 16 - Computer skills 17 - Relevant work and life experience 18 - Emotional intelligence
Future competencies Ability to adapt/ flexibility and ability to learn continuously (10) Digital competence (8) Work in a team/ cooperation skills, including with people of all ages (7) Emotional intelligence (6) Problem solving skills (5) Ability to take responsibility (4) Foreign languages and creativity/ ability to work interdisciplinary (4) Ability to distinguish true information and to use it creatively (4)
HE activities employers would be ready to get involved in Developing occupational standards 6% 6% 89% Offering work placements 14% 6% 80% Offering resarch topics 17% 6% 77% Organising visits to enterprises 20% 9% 71% Developing and improving learning outcomes 20% 11% 69% Career days 23% 9% 69% Student evaluation 23% 9% 69% Implementation of the study programmes Participation in conferences and seminars about the quality of HE 23% 23% 9% 11% 69% 66% Teaching study courses 29% 20% 51% Coaching of students 37% 14% 49% The work of the study programme council 34% 17% 49% Leading the research work of students as advisors 34% 20% 46% Improving competences of academic staff 34% 20% 46% Cooperation with the Student Union of Latvia 37% 20% 43% 0 25 50 75 100 Percentage Response Not at all Rather no Neither Rather yes Definitely yes
What employers expect from HEIs Openness and willingness to cooperate Clear and concise communication HEIs should participate as a coordinator and facilitator for cooperation between students and employers HEIs should provide a compilation of all activities employers could participate in Very precise information regarding what HEI wants from employers Clear division of responsibilities To consider employer feedback Procedures for involving employers in internal QA
ESG Part 1 Suggestions for improvement of HE QA system Pay more attention to internal QA system Evaluate the quality, not just compliance with formal criteria Ensure stronger demand for quality from all stakeholders (students, employers, state) to ensure the evaluation of academic staff based on student and alumni assessments and to ensure regular programme evaluations by HEIs ESG Part 3 to implement properly all existing procedures for QA and to promote partnerships with stakeholders on a daily basis
Suggestions for improvement of HE QA system ESG Part 2 Processes & Methodology Peer-review experts: careful selection, professional attitude, proper training, high quality work, international experts, avoid conflict of interest. Stronger requirements and control to ensure that striving to attract more students and funding doesn t override the quality of education International experience Decrease bureaucracy Regular monitoring of HE quality and consistent follow-up process ensuring implementation of recommendations Criteria: To evaluate quality of work-placements whether they are linked to the study programme and learning outcomes
Conclusions HEIs should consider concentrating the resources on developing the competencies related to emotional intelligence. In the future, the importance of flexibility and ability to learn continuously, digital competence and cooperation skills will increase. Employers are willing to participate the most in development of occupational standards, providing work placements, offering research topics and organising visits to enterprises. To enhance employer participation in higher education, HEIs should be more open and willing to cooperate, as well as ensure clear and concise communication. QA system of HEIs should ensure better work of peer-review experts, pay more attention to the development of internal quality assurance system and consider application of best international practice.
Thank you for your attention! References Bacon, D.R. (2003). A comparison of approaches to importance performance analysis. International Journal of Market Research, 45(1), 55-77. Goleman, D. (1998), Working with Emotional Intelligence, Bloomsbury, London. Martilla, J. A., & James, J. C. (1977). Importance performance analysis. Journal of Marketing, 41(1), 77-79. Pool, L., & Sewell, P. (2007). The key to employability: developing a practical model of graduate employability. Education + Training, 49(4), 277 289. Pool, L. D., Qualter, P., & Sewell, P. J. (2014). Exploring the factor structure of the CareerEDGE employability development profile. Education + Training, 56(3), 303 313.
Questions What procedures do HEIs in other countries have for involving employers in QA? How much of the curricula should be controlled by employers? Should HEIs be concerned with employability competencies? What role should alumni associations play as a facilitator of communication between employers and higher education institutions? What are the expectations of other stakeholders in quality assurance?