Climate and Land Use Consequences to 100-Year Flooding

Similar documents
Assessing the Risk of 100-year Freshwater Floods in the Lamprey River Watershed of New Hampshire Resulting from Changes in Climate and Land Use

Climate and Land Use Consequences to 100-Year Flooding

Climate and Land Use Consequences to 100-Year Flooding

Mapping and Legal Implications of Future Flooding in the Lamprey River Watershed of New Hampshire Due to Changes in Land Use and Climate

Assessing the Risk of 100-year Freshwater Floods in the Lamprey River Watershed of New Hampshire Resulting from Changes in Climate and Land Use

Assessing the Risk of 100-year Freshwater Floods in the Lamprey River Watershed of New Hampshire Resulting from Changes in Climate and Land Use

Assessing the Risk of 100-year Freshwater Floods in the Lamprey River Watershed of New Hampshire Resulting from Changes in Climate and Land Use

Hydrologic Calibration:

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT YATES ASH POND 3 (AP-3) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY

Building Resilience to Flooding and Climate Change in the Moonlight Brook Watershed

A Hydrologic Study of the. Ryerson Creek Watershed

SECTION IV WATERSHED TECHNICAL ANALYSIS

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT YATES ASH POND B (AP-B ) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY

GISHYDRO: Developing Discharges and Watershed Parameters

SECTION III: WATERSHED TECHNICAL ANALYSIS

SAW MILL RIVER DAYLIGHTING ANALYSIS AT RIVER PARK CENTER

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT BARRY ASH POND ALABAMA POWER COMPANY

5/25/2017. Overview. Flood Risk Study Components HYDROLOGIC MODEL (HEC-HMS) CALIBRATION FOR FLOOD RISK STUDIES. Hydraulics. Outcome or Impacts

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT GASTON GYPSUM POND ALABAMA POWER COMPANY

PWD s Systematic Watershed-wide Approach to Stormwater Mgmt.

Case Studies in Hazard Class Reductions Implementation of NY s Guidance for Dam Hazard Classification

Bridge Replacement Project. Preliminary Hydraulic Study. Lincoln, California BRLS-5089 (021) BRIDGE 19C Mcbean Park Drive at Auburn Ravine

Beaver Brook Flood Study

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. Part PLANT MCINTOSH ASH POND 1 GEORGIA POWER COMPANY

BMP Design Aids. w w w. t r a n s p o r t a t i o n. o h i o. g o v. Equations / Programs

San Antonio Water System Mitchell Lake Constructed Wetlands Below the Dam Preliminary Hydrologic Analysis

Stormwater: Too Simple?

INITIAL INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT MCMANUS ASH POND A (AP-1) 40 CFR

Growing Your Green Infrastructure Program

Appendix A Watershed Modeling Technical Data

Cokato Lake (86-263) Wright County. Hydrologic Investigation

Jacobi, Toombs, and Lanz, Inc.

TABLE OF CONTENTS. 1.0 Background Watershed Description Hydrology - HEC-HMS Models Hydraulics - HEC-RAS Models...

APPENDIX IV. APPROVED METHODS FOR QUANTIFYING HYDROLOGIC CONDITIONS OF CONCERN (NORTH ORANGE COUNTY)

N.H. Sea Grant Research Project Progress Report For time period 2/1/15 1/31/16

Distribution Restriction Statement Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

Reservoir on the Rio Boba

SEWRPC Staff Memorandum

Climate Change Implications for Stormwater Management in Massachusetts. Thomas Maguire, MassDEP March 2014

Chapter 6. Hydrology. 6.0 Introduction. 6.1 Design Rainfall

Estimating the 100-year Peak Flow for Ungagged Middle Creek Watershed in Northern California, USA

Technical Memorandum. Hydraulic Analysis Smith House Flood Stages. 1.0 Introduction

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT BOWEN ASH POND 1 (AP-1) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY

Surprise in Plymouth as flood floods floodplain in flooding season, 28 Feb 2017 (taken from Twitter)

Modeling a Complex Hydraulic Environment Using a 1-D Approach Supplemented with Simple 2-D Principles Manas Borah Ed Dickson June 5, 2014

Little Bear Brook Flood Hazard Assessment and Redevelopment Area Regional Stormwater Management Analysis. Progress Meeting

City of Katy Flood Protection Study (Meeting 3 of 3) October 23, 2017

Rainfall, Runoff and Peak Flows: Calibration of Hydrologic Design Methods for the Kansas City Area

The prioritization list along with the estimated probable construction cost and future cost index is shown in Table 1.

DRAINAGE MASTER PLAN FOR THE TOWN OF BLOOMING GROVE AND VILLAGES OF WASHINGTONVILLE AND SOUTH BLOOMING GROVE

PA of NY&NJ - TETERBORO AIRPORT RUNWAY 6-24 Engineered Material Arresting System (EMAS) UNSTEADY-STATE FLOODPLAIN ANALYSIS

IBS Site Drainage: Senior Design Project

Prepared for: City of Jeffersonville. November Prepared by

DEVELOPMENT OF A HYDRO-GEOMORPHIC MODEL FOR THE LAGUNA CREEK WATERSHED

Project Summary: - Hydrologic Models. - LiDAR Based - 10 Synthetic Events - No Historic Events - 100yr Runoff is Largest - Assumes Even Rainfall

Integrated Watershed Modeling of the Alewife Brook: Developing the Right Tools for Climate Change Preparedness

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT GREENE COUNTY ASH POND ALABMA POWER COMPANY

3.3 Acceptable Downstream Conditions

December 7, Dr. Christine Pomeroy University of Utah Civil and Environmental Engineering MCE Salt Lake City, UT. Dear Dr.

Modeling Infiltration BMPs

What to Expect When You re Expecting A LOMR. Mark Seidelmann, PE, GISP ASFPM 2015, Atlanta Georgia

Integrating HEC HMS generated flow hydrographs with FLO-2D. Nanda Meduri, PE, PMP, CFM Seth Lawler Venkata Dinakar Nimmala, CFM

Project Drainage Report

Engineering Report Preliminary Floodplain Study. Executive Summary

ATTACHMENT 6 WATER QUALITY SWALE DESIGN ADDENDUM

HEC-RAS 2D Modeling in Support of Ascension Parish Levee Certification

FAST WATER / SLOW WATER AN EVALUATION OF ESTIMATING TIME FOR STORMWATER RUNOFF

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND INFORMATION REVIEWED

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT DANIEL ASH POND B MISSISSIPPI POWER COMPANY

HYDROLOGIC-HYDRAULIC STUDY BAYAMON SOUTH COMMERCIAL CENTER BAYAMON, PUERTO RICO. Casiano Ancalle, P.E. August, 2006 I.

Freight Street Development Strategy

San Luis Obispo Creek Watershed Hydrologic Model Inputs

6/9/2014. An overview of the upcoming 25th anniversary of the highly visible, multijurisdictional, Outline of Presentation

Creating a Flood Forecasting System for the San Diego River Watershed

HYDROLOGY REPORT HEACOCK & CACTUS CHANNELS MORENO VALLEY, CALIFORNIA NOVEMBER 2005 REVISED APRIL 2006 REVISED AUGUST 2006

Hey and Associates, Inc.

Drainage Analysis. Appendix E

Are You Ready for Risk and Uncertainty Analysis?

Sawmill Brook Culvert and Green Infrastructure Analysis

Autumn semester of Prof. Kim, Joong Hoon

Technical Memorandum No River Geometry

Master Watershed Study Final Report Volume 1

Airport Master Plan. Floodplain Report. Prepared by: Prepared for: Illinois Department of Transportation

Design of Stormwater Wetlands

UNH STORMWATER CENTER EFFECTIVE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT Lamprey River Symposium January 16, 2009

DRAFT FOREST VIEW, ILLINOIS SECTION 205 FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT APPENDIX E HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS

Urban Watershed Renewal in Berry Brook: An Examination of Impervious Cover, Stream Restoration and Ecosystem Response

RUN-ON AND RUN-OFF CONTROL PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT DANIEL NORTH ASH MANAGEMENT UNIT MISSISSIPPI POWER COMPANY

STORMWATER HYDROLOGY

DRAFT. Jacob Torres, P.E.; Nick Fang, Ph.D., P.E.

IMPROVED MODELING OF THE GREAT PEE DEE RIVER: DOCUMENTATION IN SUPPORT OF FEMA APPEAL. Horry County, South Carolina

HYDROLOGIC MODELING CONSISTENCY AND SENSITIVITY TO WATERSHED SIZE

CEDAR RUN WATERSHED ACT 167 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN FINAL REPORT

Section 6: Stormwater Improvements

LIST OF TABLES.II LIST OF FIGURES.II LIST OF ATTACHMENTS.II I. INTRODUCTION.1 II. STUDY AREA.3 III

Overview of NRCS (SCS) TR-20 By Dr. R.M. Ragan

Modeling the Hydrologic Impacts of Control Structures Utilizing LiDAR, ICPR, and GIS Technologies

THE WATER IS RISING SCALABLE, RELIABLE, AND RELEVANT INFORMATION SUPPORTING FIRST RESPONDERS. May 3, 2017

Recent Activities of the Maryland Hydrology Panel

Transcription:

Climate and Land Use Consequences to 100-Year Flooding Robert Roseen D.WRE, PE, PhD, Ann Scholz, PE, CPSWQ, Thomas Ballestero, PhD, PE, PH, UNH Stormwater Center Nebraska Post- Construction Stormwater Workshop Lincoln, Nebraska March 21, 2012 Lamprey River 100 Year Flood Risk Project Two year project funded by the Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology (CICEET) Interdisciplinary Team: Robert Roseen, Ann Scholz, Thomas Ballestero, UNH Stormwater Center Cameron Wake, Institute for the Study of Earth, Oceans and Space, UNH Steve Miller, Great Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve Kathy Mills, Great Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve Fay Rubin, Institute for the Study of Earth, Oceans and Space, UNH Michael Simpson, Antioch University New England Lisa Townson and Julia Peterson, UNH Cooperative Extension 1

1. Failure to think globally and act locally-we must account for climate change 2. Failure to absorb new knowledge 3. Failure to understand, manage, and communicate risk-need to take rigorous risk based approach, 4. Failure to build quality in 5. Failure to build in resilience 6. Failure to provide redundancy 7. Failure to see that the sum of many parts does not equal a system 8. The buck couldn t find a place to stop--poor organization, lack of accountability 9. Beware of interfaces: materials and jurisdiction 10. Follow the money-people responsible for design and construction had no control of the monies. 4 2

Research examining impacts of climate change on rainfall depths (28-60% increase) demonstrated existing urban infrastructure (culverts) will be under-capacity by 35% (Guo, 2006) This in addition to stressed stormwater infrastructure from land use change 15 Highest Events Peak Recorded Discharges on Lamprey River Rank Date Discharge (cfs) 1 16-May-06 8,970 2 18-Apr-07 8,450 3 7-Apr-87 7,570 4 22-Oct-96 7,080 5 15-Mar-10 6,760 6 20-Mar-36 5,490 7 15-Mar-77 5,000 8 15-June-98 4,720 9 3-Apr-04 4,690 10 30-Mar-83 4,570 11 6-Apr-60 4,470 12 11-May-54 4,070 13 2-Feb-81 3,670 14 31-July-38 3,530 15 1-Apr-93 3,400 Of 15 largest events since 1934: 8 have occurred in last 25 years 5 have occurred in last 15 years 3 have occurred in last 5 years FIS: 7300 cfs =100-Yr Flood Flow Source: http://waterdata.usgs.gov/nwis 6 3

CAUSES Land Use Changes Increase in impervious cover Changes in storm depth, duration, and frequency Increased rainfall depth and runoff volume SOLUTIONS Land use management strategies to mitigate runoff volumes 7 The use of LID planning and technologies can contribute to building community resiliency in managing water resources and reduce the flood risk associated with current and projected changes in land use and climate. 8 4

Hydrologic Model Scenarios Project Models Rainfall Rates and Global Change Model Scenario Climate Period Climate Period Land Use Rainfall Atlas 2035-2069 2070-2099 Conditions TP-40 NRCC NRCC Regional Model 6.3 in/hr 8.5 in/hr 8.5 in/hr X in/hr Current 2005 2005 Build-out 2050 2085 LID/Build-out 2050 2085 9 Lamprey River Watershed 10 5

FEMA Requirements for Redelineation Hydrologic Analysis: o Bulletin 17B for gaged streams Effective Model 1935 through 1987 Q 100 = 7,300 cfs o Criteria for revised hydrologic analysis Statistically Significance (68-percent confidence interval) L 0.01,0.68 = 6,886 cfs H 0.01,0.68 = 7,834 cfs 75 yr record 1935-2009 Q 100 = 9,411 cfs Statistically Significant 11 W6510 W6730 W7060 Subbasin Area (mi2) W6510 32.2 W8600 19.0 W11900 16.0 W10910 6.5 W8380 12.3 W11020 6.1 W6730 58.3 W7060 33.9 W7920 4.5 W10250 21.7 W8590 0.9 Total 211.7 W7920 W8600 W8380 W11020 W8590 W11900 W10910 W10250 12 6

Subbasin CN W6510 62.5 W8600 63.0 W11900 64.2 W10910 61.2 W8380 63.5 W11020 62.5 W6730 65.4 W7060 63.9 W7920 67.7 W10250 66.0 W8590 71.0 W6510 W6730 W7060 W7920 W8600 W8380 W8590 W11020 W11900 W10910 W10250 13 Current Conditions, CN = 66.8 Conventional Build-Out, CN = 78.0 LID Build-Out CN = 69.5 14 7

Commercial Zoning One Acre Residential Runoff Curve Number Reduction Method from : 1. McCuen, R. and M. D. E. (1983). Changes in Runoff Curve Number Method; 2. Maryland Department of Environment (2008). Maryland Stormwater Design Manual, Supplement No. 1. 15 Summary of Cross Section Data Source Source Number FEMA FIS Backup Data 111 Duplicates 19 Surveyed 12 NHDOT/Consultants 34 GIS 44 Total 220 16 8

Elevation (ft) 3/30/2012 Hydraulics Model Results for RT108 Hydraulics Model Results and Calibration for RT108 45 40 River = Beaudette Brook Reach = DS RT108 FP.06.07.06 NRCC 100-YR WSE = 35.83 April 2007 WSE = 34.41 March 2010 WSE =33.58 FIS WSE = 33.0 Observed WSE: April 2007 34.1 March 2010 33.3 Legend WS SCS 100-YR WS 04-07 WS 03-10 Ground Bank Sta 35 30 25 20-1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 Station (ft) 1 8 9

Model updates indicated a 45% increase in the 100-year flood flow from USGS gage: 7,300 cfs (FIS) to 10,649 cfs (NRCC) An increase in the base flood elevations by an average of 2.7 feet along the 36 mile study reach. NRCC elevation almost two feet higher than April 2007 event Watershed Scale Build-Out Conventional development resulted in an increase 0.3 feet in base flood elevation and a 4.3% flood flow increase and only a 2.8% increase with the LID scenario. Subwatershed Scale Build-Out Urban sub basins had substantial runoff reductions using LID build-out scenarios and in one instance actually reduced beyond current conditions. Conventional build-out had increases in runoff from 29-36% whereas LID build-out had a range of -2-7%. This last finding is substantial illustrates that LID in a redevelopment scenario can serve to reduce runoff from current conditions. 10

Funding Funding is provided by the Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology (CICEET) whose mission is to support the scientific development of innovative technologies for understanding and reversing the impacts of coastal and estuarine contamination and degradation. Thank you for your time. Questions? 11

Hydraulics Model Cross Sections Summary of Cross Section Data Source Source Number FEMA FIS Backup Data 111 Duplicates 19 Surveyed 12 NHDOT/Consultants 34 GIS 44 Total 220 FIS sections were duplicated as needed to provide immediate sections up and downstream of bridges No backup data available for Lee Projects included additional sections supplementing FIS sections Improved modeling in RT108 corridor and tributaries 23 Hydraulics Model Structural Data Summary of Bridge Structure Source for the Lamprey River Community Station Road Name Data Source Raymond 181300 Dudley Road 180964 Raymond Road (RT 27) 167900 Langford Road 160746 Main Street 155060 Epping Street 154106 B&M Railroad 147643 Freetown Road (RT 107) 141372 Prescott Road Epping 136759 State Route 101 Electronic WSP2 files from Roald Haestad, Inc. March 1993 127937 Epping Road (RT 27) Electronic HEC-RAS files from NHDOT, 2010 123964 Blake Road 107459 Main Street (Plummer) As-built drawings from NHDOT, dates vary 106269 Mill Street 105560 Calef Hwy (RT 125) Electronic HEC-RAS files from NHDOT, 2000 88171 Hedding Road (RT 87) WSPRO print out and As-built from NHDOT, 2000 Lee 61457 Wadleigh Falls Road 35683 Lee Hook Road As-built drawings from NHDOT, dates vary Durham 20082 Wiswall Road Electronic HEC-RAS files from CLD Consulting, 2009 16028 Packer's Falls Road Newmarket 1602 RT 108 FEMA FIS Backup Data Summary of Bridge Structure Source for the RT108 Corridor Watercourse Station Road Name Data Source Floodplain 71 Newmarket Road (RT 108) Survey drawings from NHDOT, 2010 Hamil Brook 1040 Newmarket Road (RT 108) Longmarsh Brook 4182 Bedard Road Longmarsh Brook 1703 Longmarsh Road FEMA FIS Backup Data Longmarsh Brook 275 Tote Road 24 12

Hydraulics Model Dam and In-line Structural Data Summary of In-line Structure Source for the Lamprey River Community Station Road Name Data Source Epping 127265 Bunker Pond Dam Electronic HEC-RAS files from NHDOT Lee 61266 Wadleigh Falls Dam Land Records Durham 19859 Wiswall Dam Electronic HEC-RAS files from CLD Consulting Engineers Newmarket 1286 Coffee Sluice Newmarket 1164 Macallen Dam Electronic HEC-RAS files from Wright-Pierce NHDES Dam Management studying removal of Bunker Pond dam Wiswall bridge has been replaced and downstream dam replacement in near future Macallen Dam recently inspected per NHDES request Spillway dimensions and layout, elevation field verified 25 Calibrating the Watershed Calibration: o April 2007 7,590 cfs, Precipitation 7.65 in o March 2010 6,550 cfs, Precipitation 7.02 in Optimization parameters: o Manning s n o Lag Time o Tc Simulated for o Time to peak o Runoff volume o Peak flow 2 6 13

Calibrating the Watershed 2 7 Calibrating the Watershed 28 14

Calibrating the Watershed Hydrology Model Calculated flood flow for the gaged 183 sq.mi. watershed Results of calibrated model run for current land use (2005) using TP-40 rainfall. Q 100, TP-40 = 7,580 cfs vs. Q 100, FIS = 7,300 cfs Results of calibrated model run for current land use (2005) using NRCC Atlas rainfall. Q 100, CA = 10,649 cfs 68-percent confidence interval of gaging station estimate for data from 1935-2009, Q 100, LP3 = 9,411 cfs L 0.01,0.68 = 8,862 cfs H 0.01,0.68 = 10,040 cfs 29 15