Earned Value Management on Firm Fixed Price Contracts: The DoD Perspective

Similar documents
Tailoring Earned Value Management

Earned Value Management from a Behavioral Perspective ARMY

OUSD(A&T) Initiatives Update. Wayne Abba 8th Annual International Cost Schedule Performance Management Conference

Advanced Amphibious Assault Vehicle (AAAV)

Earned Value Management

Implementation of the Best in Class Project Management and Contract Management Initiative at the U.S. Department of Energy s Office of Environmental

Defense Business Board

Earned Value. Defense Acquisition Reform and Project Management. Wayne Abba Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition & Technology)

Joint JAA/EUROCONTROL Task- Force on UAVs

Biased Cramer-Rao lower bound calculations for inequality-constrained estimators (Preprint)

Issues for Future Systems Costing

ITEA LVC Special Session on W&A

Improvements to Hazardous Materials Audit Program Prove Effective

US Naval Open Systems Architecture Strategy

Army Quality Assurance & Administration of Strategically Sourced Services

Robustness of Communication Networks in Complex Environments - A simulations using agent-based modelling

Tactical Equipment Maintenance Facilities (TEMF) Update To The Industry Workshop

DoD Solid Waste Diversion

PROJECT MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE:

Ultraviolet (UV) Curable Coatings DoD Executive for Bullet Agent Tip Identification

Trends in Acquisition Workforce. Mr. Jeffrey P. Parsons Executive Director Army Contracting Command

Flexible Photovoltaics: An Update

Panel 5 - Open Architecture, Open Business Models and Collaboration for Acquisition

Report No. D August 1, Internal Controls Over U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Civil Works, Disbursement Processes

Kelly Black Neptune & Company, Inc.

Department of Defense Green Procurement Program and Biobased Products

SEDD Our Vision. Anand Mudambi. Joseph Solsky USACE USEPA 3/31/2011 1

PL and Payment of CWA Stormwater Fees

Application of the HEC-5 Hydropower Routines

22 nd Annual Systems & Software Technology Conference. Salt Lake City, Utah April 2010

Satisfying DoD Contract Reporting With Agile Artifacts

Bio-Response Operational Testing & Evaluation (BOTE) Project

Contractor Past Performance Information: An Analysis of Assessment Narratives and Objective Ratings. Rene G. Rendon Uday Apte Michael Dixon

Diminishing Returns and Policy Options in a Rentier State: Economic Reform and Regime Legitimacy in Saudi Arabia

Supply Chain Modeling: Downstream Risk Assessment Methodology (DRAM)

Planning Value. Leslie (Les) Dupaix USAF Software S T S C. (801) DSN:

CORROSION CONTROL Anniston Army Depot

Energy Security: A Global Challenge

Ranked Set Sampling: a combination of statistics & expert judgment

An Open Strategy for the Acquisition of Models and Simulations. Rudolph P. Darken Director, MOVES Institute

Processing of Hybrid Structures Consisting of Al-Based Metal Matrix Composites (MMCs) With Metallic Reinforcement of Steel or Titanium

AIR FORCE RESEARCH LABORATORY RESEARCH ON AUTONOMOUS AND NON- DESTRUCTIVE PAVEMENT SURFACE ASSESSMENT

EXPLOSIVE CAPACITY DETERMINATION SYSTEM. The following provides the Guidelines for Use of the QDARC Program for the PC.

RFID and Hazardous Waste Implementation Highlights

AF Future Logistics Concepts

SE Tools Overview & Advanced Systems Engineering Lab (ASEL)

309th Commodities Group

Two Approaches to Rehabilitation of Metal Roofing at Wheeler Army Airfield Hawaii

Anti-Corrosion Nanotechnology Solutions for Logistics (ACNS-L)

Reliability and Maintainability (R&M) Engineering Update

Agenda. Current Acquisition Environment-Strategic Sourcing. Types of Contract Vehicles. Specific Contract Vehicles for Navy-wide Use DOD EMALL

Fort Belvoir Compliance-Focused EMS. E2S2 Symposium Session June 16, 2010

11. KEYNOTE 2 : Rebuilding the Tower of Babel Better Communication with Standards

Augmenting Task-Centered Design With Operator State Assessment Technologies

INVASIVE SPECIES IMPACT ON THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

TITLE: Identification of Protein Kinases Required for NF2 Signaling

The Nuts and Bolts of Zinc-Nickel

DoD Sustainable Buildings. Col Bart Barnhart ODUSD(I&E) May 12, 2011

Future Capabilities of GenCade Ashley Frey

Alex G. Manganaris Director, Workforce Plans and Resources

Transaction Cost Economics (TCE) and Cost Estimation Methodology

DISTRIBUTION A: APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE; DISTRIBUTION IS UNLIMITED

A Quality Control Procedure Specialized for Incremental Sampling

STANDARDIZATION DOCUMENTS

INDIAN HEAD DIVISION NAVAL SURFACE WARFARE CENTER INDIAN HEAD, MD. Erratum to IHTR 2375

Addressing Species at Risk Before Listing - MCB Camp Lejeune and Coastal Goldenrod

SENSITIVITY TESTING OF CONTAMINATED SURFACES TO ESTABLISH NON-REACTIVITY LEVELS OF HMX, TATB, HBNQ, NC, AND TETRYL ON WOOD, CONCRETE, AND METAL

Success with the DoD Mentor Protégé Program

Laura Biszko NSRDEC /03/2011 UNCLASSIFIED

NEC2 Effectiveness and Agility: Analysis Methodology, Metrics, and Experimental Results*

Service Incentive Towards an SOA Friendly Acquisition Process

1 ISM Document and Training Roadmap. Challenges/ Opportunities. Principles. Systematic Planning. Statistical Design. Field.

DLA Troop Support Clothing & Textiles

DoD Sustainability Strategy The Latest. Mr. Dave Asiello DUSD(I&E)/CMRM

TITLE: Molecular Determinants Fundamental to Axon Regeneration after SCI

Addressing the Barriers to Agile Development in DoD

Predicting Disposal Costs for United States Air Force Aircraft (Presentation)

Improving Energy Efficiency at the Watervliet Arsenal

73rd MORSS CD Cover Page UNCLASSIFIED DISCLOSURE FORM CD Presentation

Water Sustainability & Conservation in an Exhaust Cooling Discharge System Case Study

Oversight Review January 27, Quality Control Review of Army Audit Agency's Special Access Program Audits. Report No.

Performance-Based Acquisitions (PBA) E2S2 Conference April 2011

Geothermal Energy Demonstration at Fort Indiantown Gap

Using Ferromagnetic Material to Extend and Shield the Magnetic Field of a Coil

Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme For. Information Technology Laboratory. Guidance to Validators of IT Security Evaluations

Big Data: Big Confusion? Big Challenges?

Cataloging Green Items

Emission Guide Update for Mobile and Stationary Sources at Air Force Installations

DESCRIPTIONS OF HYDROGEN-OXYGEN CHEMICAL KINETICS FOR CHEMICAL PROPULSION

NOGAPS/NAVGEM Platform Support

Aircraft Enroute Command and Control Comms Redesign Mechanical Documentation

Aeronautical Systems Center

PREPARED FOR: U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command Fort Detrick, Maryland

Strategic Sourcing with Small Business in Mind

At the Defense Acquisition University, we spend a lot of time with incoming program. Calling on Mission Assistance. John Higbee Jesse Stewart

Agile Integration of Complex Systems

Performance of FRP Connectors for Seismic Rehab of Michie Stadium

DoD Environmental Information Technology Management (EITM) Program

THE NATIONAL SHIPBUILDING RESEARCH PROGRAM

DoD CIO Interoperability Process

Transcription:

Earned Value Management on Firm Fixed Price Contracts: The DoD Perspective Van Kinney Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition & Technology)

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burder for this collection of information is estibated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing this collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burder to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports (0704-0188), 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR FORM TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS. 1. REPORT DATE (DD-MM-YYYY) 2. REPORT TYPE 17-05-1998 Conference presentation 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE Earned Value Management on Firm Fixed Price contracts: The DoD Perspective Unclassified 6. AUTHOR(S) Van Kinney, ; 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS OUSD(A&T) xxxxx xxxxx, xxxxxxx 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS OUSD(A&T), 3. DATES COVERED (FROM - TO) 17-05-1998 to 20-05-1998 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR'S ACRONYM(S) 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR'S REPORT NUMBER(S) 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT APUBLIC RELEASE, 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES Presentations and papers from 14th annual International Performance Management Association Conference held May 17-20, 1998 in Clearwater Beach, FL. 14. ABSTRACT See report. 15. SUBJECT TERMS 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT Public Release a. REPORT Unclassified b. ABSTRACT Unclassified c. THIS PAGE Unclassified 18. NUMBER OF PAGES 7 19. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON http://www.acq.osd.mil/pm/paperpres/0598pma_conf. (blank) lfenster@dtic.mil 19b. TELEPHONE NUMBER International Area Code Area Code Telephone Number 703767-9007 DSN 427-9007 Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std Z39.18

Contracting Policy Select contract type based on risk (FAR 16) Use of fixed price contracts on development or on contracts for first ship of a class requires USD(A&T) approval (DoD 5000.2, DFARS 235.006) Acquisition requirements usually result in FFP being used only on contracts with minimal risk.

EVMS Criteria Policy (DoD 5000.2-R) Compliance with EVMS criteria required on major contracts R&D >$70M* Procurement >$300M* May be required on smaller contracts at management discretion High risk or management interest * FY 96 constant $

FFP EVMS Policy (DoD 5000.2-R) EVMS discouraged for FFP Requires exception by Milestone Decision Authority EVMS not considered necessary for low risk contracts But PMs should exercise judgment May be appropriate on critical contracts

Use of EVMS Criteria on FFP Contracts - Why Do It? Contractor point of view: Use enterprise-wide management systems Government point of view: Provide contract administration tool to assess payments Common points of view: Provide integrated schedule status Important to manage resources well EVMS Criteria = good management

Reporting Considerations Less information should be required Reporting needs should flow from reasons for application Support progress payments Integrate schedule status Inform management

Other Considerations Perceived/real inhibitor to market entry by commercial firms? Validation? Integrated Baseline Reviews? Differing agency interpretations? Judgment vs regulation Risk based application