Economic Opportunities for Missouri with Swine Finishing Operations. January 2013

Similar documents
The Iowa Pork Industry 2008: Patterns and Economic Importance by Daniel Otto and John Lawrence 1

The Iowa Pork Industry 2003: Patterns and Economic Importance

Economic Impacts from Increasing Pig Farrowing in Iowa

National Pork Producers Council

Diversified versus Specialized Swine and Grain Operations

Partnering Associations

EXTENSION. The Economic Impact of a Commercial Cattle Operation in a Rural Nebraska County. Key Findings EC856

Jason Henderson Vice President and Branch Executive Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Omaha Branch April 25, 2012

A. Circle the best answer. Put a square around your second choice, if you want. If your second choice is correct you get half credit.

Prepared by: Agricultural Marketing Services Division Minnesota Department of Agriculture 90 West Plato Boulevard St.

2012 Farm Outlook. Highlights

Economic Research Service The USDA Commodity Costs and Returns (CAR) Estimation Project

2006 Iowa Farm Costs. and Returns File C1-10. Ag Decision Maker. Definition of Terms Used

Grant County Blake s Point RE, LLC information sheet for a sow farm

Economic Impact of Swine Operations. User Guide. National Pork Board

Using Enterprise Budgets to Compute Crop Breakeven Prices Michael Langemeier, Associate Director, Center for Commercial Agriculture

LIVESTOCK FEEDING ENTERPRISES PROFITABLE IN 1996

BUILDING ENTERPRISE BUDGETS FOR INDIANA SPECIALTY CROP GROWERS

Economic Impact of Agriculture and Agribusiness in Miami-Dade County, Florida

The University of Georgia

USING IMPLAN TO ASSESS LOCAL ECONOMIC IMPACTS. David Mulkey and Alan W. Hodges. Introduction 1

Report on Minnesota Farm Finances. April, 2010

Missouri 700-Cow Dairy Model. A Value Added Enterprise for Missouri Crop Producers

Report on Minnesota Farm Finances. August, 2009

How do cover crops affect whole farm profitability?

Enterprise Diversification to Improve Efficiency and Profitability

FARM BUSINESS MANAGEMENT

CONTRIBUTION OF THE ETHANOL INDUSTRY TO THE ECONOMY OF THE UNITED STATES

Trends in the Missouri Swine Industry

Economic Contribution of the Missouri Corn and Ethanol Industry

Agriculture has historically been an

The University of Georgia

Nutrient Management in Crop Production

Two-litter Outdoor Farrowing System Budget

Livestock Enterprise. Budgets for Iowa 2017 File B1-21. Ag Decision Maker

What is going on in hog industry? Slow down in growth Plain says 1.8% bigger YTD

The Nutrient Value of Manure: What s it Really Worth? Brad Joern Department of Agronomy

Flue Cured Tobacco Production Costs:

Contribution of Agribusiness to the Magic Valley Economy, 2010

Cash Flow and Enterprise Information - step two for your 2016 farm analysis

Urban Ag Academy. A Look Into Iowa s Pork Industry. Gregg Hora Iowa Pork Producer IPPA President Elect

MEASURING SCOPE EFFICIENCY FOR CROP AND BEEF FARMS. M. R. Langemeier 1 and R. D. Jones 1

Economic Contribution of the U.S. Lead Battery Industry

Guidelines for Estimating. Weaner Pig (Nursery) Costs 2012 in Manitoba

Revenue Components. Yield Government Programs Crop Insurance

Mapping for manure management Written by Diane Mettler

Contribution of Agribusiness to the Magic Valley Economy, 2013

2011 Michigan Cash Grain Farm Business Analysis Summary. Eric Wittenberg And Christopher A. Wolf. Staff Paper October, 2012

October 1, 1996 Ames, Iowa Econ. Info. 1703

Appendix I Whole Farm Analysis Procedures and Measures

Economic Impact of a Second Generation Biofuels Facility

EASTERN CORN BELT DELAYS CONTINUE, MORE FARM PROGRAM DETAILS

1. What variable costs are associated with corn and grain sorghum production?

2005 In Review In Review. Mark Greenwood in Review Cost of Production What is happening in the country Challenges & Issues

CONTRIBUTION OF THE ETHANOL INDUSTRY TO THE ECONOMY OF THE UNITED STATES

A Comparison of High and Low Profit Swine Producers in Iowa

Contribution of Agribusiness to the Idaho Economy, 2013

2007 Michigan Cash Grain Farm Business Analysis Summary. Eric Wittenberg And Stephen Harsh. Staff Paper December, 2008

Farrow-to-Finish Swine Production in Ten Counties of West Tennessee

Crops Marketing and Management Update

Value of Manure as a Fertilizer. What s so good about manure? Typical Nutrient Concentration

Diversifying Your Income Streams

Construction and Operational Impacts

Revised Estimated Returns Series Beginning in 2007

Grain Prices Remain Sensitive to Weather, Export Developments

Weaner Pig (Nursery) Costs 5-23 kg

Bank of America Corporation Estimated economic benefits of the Environmental Business Initiative September 2017

THE BENEFITS OF FINANCIAL BENCHMARKING TO FARMERS IN THE UNITED STATES

ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF CATTLE, HOG, DAIRY, AND POULTRY INDUSTRY CHANGES

Contribution of Agribusiness to the Idaho Economy, 2011

Livestock Enterprise. Budgets for Iowa 2010 File B1-21. Ag Decision Maker

Livestock Enterprise. Budgets for Iowa 2008 File B1-21. Ag Decision Maker

Economics of Specialty Corn Production in Missouri

2015 Cost of Potato Production Study for Colorado s San Luis Valley With Comparison to 2014

JUNE 2002 HOGS AND PIGS SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS


Wind Energy for Rural Economic Development

Costs to Produce Corn and Soybeans in Illinois 2017

and returns for an enterprise of a different size and type than the one in this budget or for different

Glenn. County PRODUCTION COSTS FOR SUDANGRASS SEED TENANT LANDOWNER SD-GL-92 BASIS. ROBERT L. SAILSBERV Farm Advisor

LITTLE EXPANSION, BUT LITTLE PROFIT AS WELL FOR PORK PRODUCERS

2006 Michigan Dairy Grazing Farm Business Analysis Summary. Eric Wittenberg And Christopher Wolf. Staff Paper November, 2007

UPDATED HOG PRODUCTION ESTIMATED RETURNS

2004 Michigan Dairy Farm Business Analysis Summary. Eric Wittenberg Christopher Wolf. Staff Paper September 2005

Costs to Produce Milk in Illinois 2016

Contribution of Agriculture to Oklahoma s Economy: 2015

FAPRI-UMC Report December 8, 2005

Hog Enterprise Summary

Economic Contribution of Projects Leveraged with AURI Assistance: Fiscal Years

Size and Growth of Contract Hog Production in Iowa

2008 Michigan Cash Grain Farm Business Analysis Summary. Eric Wittenberg And Stephen Harsh. Staff Paper November, 2009

Economics of Finishing Pigs in Hoop Structures and Confinement: A Summer Group under Different Space Restrictions

Missouri Dairy Industry Revitalization Study. Joe Horner Extension Dairy Economist MU Commercial Agriculture Program

Grain Profitability Projections

Chuck Danehower Extension Specialist Farm Management Danny Morris Extension Specialist Farm Management

Iowa Farm Outlook. July 2017 Ames, Iowa Econ. Info Large Hog Supplies Should be Manageable

Costs to Produce Milk in Illinois 2003

2017 FINBIN Report on Minnesota Farm Finances

Economic Contributions of Agriculture, Natural Resources, and Food Industries in Florida in 2016 Executive Summary

2014 Michigan Cash Grain Farm Business Analysis Summary. Eric Wittenberg And Christopher A. Wolf. Staff Paper December, 2015

Transcription:

Economic Opportunities for Missouri with Swine Finishing Operations January 2013

The Commercial Agriculture Program at the University of Missouri completed this report. This program is an interdisciplinary group of faculty in agricultural economics, agricultural engineering, animal science, plant science and veterinary medicine. Their mission is to create new opportunities for Missouri entrepreneurs and develop partnerships with firms that are both dedicated to profitable and sustainable agriculture and food systems. Faculty that contributed to this report includes: Ryan Milhollin Ray Massey Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics For further information about this report, please contact: Ryan Milhollin (573) 882 0668 (phone) or MilhollinR@missouri.edu (e mail) 1

Economic Opportunities for Missouri with Swine Finishing Operations Swine production has always been and continues to be an important economic activity in many regions of the state of Missouri. In the year 2011, Missouri had an estimated $979 million in cash farm receipts from the hog industry. Economic effects from these revenues flow into the local communities and stimulate rural economic development. While Missouri is one of the top ten states in swine production, a majority of feeder pigs are exported to other states for finishing production. This report will examine the current Missouri industry of exporting feeder pigs, the economics of a contract finishing unit and demonstrate the value created in Missouri if more feeder pigs were retained and finished in Missouri. Background on Missouri s Industry Missouri has always been a net pig exporter. Historically, Southern Missouri in particular was a very favorable place to operate sow enterprises in that production was outdoors, land and labor were relatively cheap and feeder pig production did not require a great deal of feed. This all changed as technology and new practices evolved which effectively moved production indoors and made climate and weather less relevant. Modern confinement facilities reduced labor requirements per sow which also diminished any competitive advantage of Southern Missouri. In recent decades, however, the farms in Missouri that continued to produce pigs have made substantial capital investments to expand and achieve efficiencies and have adopted ever improving practices and genetics to create the state s modern and competitive weaner/feeder pig production sector. Over the same period, many farms in Missouri that had previously purchased many of these pigs, exited the industry. The Missouri Department of Agriculture collects information concerning the number of feeder pigs that move to other states. Exhibit 1 illustrates an increasing trend of Missouri feeder pig exports over the past eight years. In 2011, Missouri exported over 4 million pigs, which is the highest level during this time period. 2

Exhibit 1 Missouri Feeder Pig Exports per Year Head 4,500,000 4,000,000 3,500,000 3,000,000 2,500,000 2,000,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 500,000 0 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Source: Missouri Department of Agriculture Currently Missouri is the seventh largest swine producer in the country. Iowa and Illinois, two bordering states, are ranked number one and number four respectively in swine production. These two states also receive over 90 percent of the feeder pigs exported from Missouri (see Exhibit 2). Missouri also sends a significant number of pigs to Indiana, Kansas, Minnesota and South Dakota. Swine production industries in importing states are impacted positively; farmers are directly impacted with revenue and the complementary industries to swine production, such as the feed mills and processing plants, experience increased business which stimulates state economic growth. 3

Exhibit 2 Missouri Feeder Pig Destinations, Percent of Total, Jan. Aug. 2012 IL 6% IN 2% MN Other States 1% 4% IA 87% Source: Missouri Department of Agriculture Economics of Swine Finishing Operations Swine finishing operations (wean to finish or grow to finish) can provide various economic impacts to the individual producer, local community, region and state. Swine finishing production contracts have been used in Missouri as a way for producers to minimize risk and capital requirements which enables them to gain financing from lenders. In this situation, the integrator generally provides the pigs, transportation, feed and other services to the producer. The producer, or grower, is the individual who supplies the building, utilities, management and labor required to care for the pigs. To understand the potential economic benefits from swine finishing, we will analyze the economics of a 2,480 head contract grow to finish operation. Developing a new operation can require various construction related activities that provide a one time economic impact. Developing a new Missouri contract grow tofinish operation in 2012 reflects a cost of approximately $240 per pig space. Construction cost estimates include all building requirements, dirt work, roads, water supply, electrical work, buildings, and land. A significant portion of these dollars will be spent locally for contractors, specialized labor, and building supplies for constructing the operation. While crop farmers entering into contract production are expected to have sufficient tractor power, additional manure handling equipment will cost approximately $55,000. The total direct economic impact for construction and capital investments for a 2,480 head grow to finish operation would be approximately $650,200. 4

Producers receive two forms of compensation for contract production: contract payments and fertilizer in the form of manure. Contract hog production payments are generally based on payment per pig space. Grow to finish contract rates in Missouri are currently close to $41 per pig space. For a 2,480 head grow to finish operation, this would result in a producer receiving a total of $101,680 on an annual basis. Manure provides an opportunity for producers to save in fertilizer costs for crop production. Based on using a deep pit for manure storage, manure nutrients from the grow finish swine operation provide one year of nitrogen and two years of P and K 2,480 head grow-to-finish operation Income per year Contract payments = $101,680 Value of manure = $56,170 Total $157,850 fertilizer requirements for approximately 640 acres of cropland managed in a cornsoybean rotation (150 bu/acre corn and 45 bu/acre soybeans). Landowners would save approximately $174/acre over the two year crop rotation assuming fertilizer prices of $.49/lb N, $.61/lb P2O5 and $.50/lb K2O. The fertilizer value in manure from a 2,480 head grow to finish operation would be approximately $56,170 per year. Swine finishing operations will also provide annual indirect economic benefits to other businesses. The producer will use his income sources to pay for these additional services, which will further stimulate the economy. Services that may be needed by the operation include building/equipment repairs, utilities, professional fees, banking, insurance, supplies, custom manure hauling, and veterinary services. In the case of the 2,480 head contract grow to finish operation, no significant outside labor will be needed to take care of the pigs. All labor expenses will be compensated in the contract payment which the farmer receives. Benefits from Increased Swine Finishing Finishing more feeder pigs in Missouri would provide many new economic impacts to individual producers, the local community and the state s economy. An analysis using IMPLAN software was conducted to illustrate the economic effects from increased swine finishing in the state of Missouri. IMPLAN is an input output model and includes economic data sets, multipliers, and demographic statistics for the entire U.S. economic infrastructure. It is a robust tool that can assess the effects of changes or industries and is widely used by economists and analysts. 5

The impacts from IMPLAN can be separated into three different categories: direct, indirect, and induced. A direct effect can be defined as the direct changes in an area as a result of a change in an industry. For example, the contract revenue and credit for manure fertilizer is a direct impact. An indirect effect would be when a producer purchases supplies or inputs from other industries (fuel, utilities, repairs, etc.). Induced effects are the changes in spending from income generated by direct and indirect impacts. For instance, the producer will use their income from their swine finishing operation to purchase homes, go shopping, doctor visits, and participate in local banking. Economic impacts are categorized by various indicators such as output, jobs, valueadded and labor income. Output reflects the total value of industry production. Another indicator is the number of jobs supported by the industry. Value added refers to the difference between the industry output (value of production) and the cost of the inputs used in its production. This term can also be interpreted as the contribution to the state s gross domestic product. Labor or household income is another economic measure that is included in the value added category. It reflects the total of employee compensation (wages and benefits) and proprietor income (self employment). In a hypothetical example, Missouri is estimated to retain and finish 100,000 feeder pigs per year. This would lead to the development of approximately 20 new 2,480 head grow to finish swine finishing operations, assuming each operation would have two turns of animals per year. The following impacts for construction and annual operations were developed using this example. Construction Impact from 100,000 Feeder Pigs Retained and Finished in Missouri A new Missouri 2,480 head contract grow to finish operation in 2012 reflects a projected cost of $650,200, which includes the building, dirt work, roads, water supply, electrical work, buildings, manure handling equipment, and land. These costs are the one time direct economic impacts that will occur from developing this new operation. For 100,000 feeder pigs retained and finished in Missouri, this would result in new direct investment of $13.1 million for the development of approximately 20 new operations. The total one time economic impacts estimated to occur in the state of Missouri from the development of these new operations are illustrated in Exhibit 3. As a result of the construction of these new swine operations, it is estimated that approximately 180 jobs would be created, $8.3 million paid to labor, $11.9 million in value added, and $22.9 in industry output when considering all economic effects. 6

Exhibit 3 Construction Impact for 100,000 Feeder Pigs Retained and Finished in Missouri Impact Type Employment Labor Income Value Added (jobs) (millions) (millions) Output (millions) Direct Effect 100.4 $4.8 $6.0 $13.1 Indirect Effect 27.8 $1.5 $2.3 $4.0 Induced Effect 50.9 $2.0 $3.6 $5.8 Total Effect 179.2 $8.3 $11.9 $22.9 Note: May not sum due to rounding Annual Operational Impact from 100,000 Feeder Pigs Retained and Finished in Missouri Each year, a contract grow to finish operation is expected to generate value from their contract payments and manure. For the year 2012, a 2,480 head contract grow finish operation is expected to generate $157,850, which would be the value of production (direct effect). For 100,000 feeder pigs retained and finished in Missouri, this would result in new total value of production of $3.2 million for operating approximately 20 new operations each year. The total annual economic impacts estimated to occur in the state of Missouri from the development of these new operations are illustrated in Exhibit 4. It is estimated that approximately 110 jobs would be sustained, $1.0 million paid to the labor force, $2.7 million in value added, and $5.1 in industry output when considering all economic effects from these new contract grow to finish operations. Exhibit 4 Annual Impact of 100,000 Feeder Pigs Retained and Finished in Missouri Impact Type Employment Labor Income Value Added (jobs) (millions) (millions) Output (millions) Direct Effect 91.6 $0.4 $1.7 $3.2 Indirect Effect 12.4 $0.3 $0.6 $1.3 Induced Effect 6.1 $0.2 $0.4 $0.7 Total Effect 110.1 $1.0 $2.7 $5.1 Note: May not sum due to rounding Tax revenues (also included in value added classification) described in this section includes those paid to local, state, and federal entities. Tax impact values show the amount of revenue generated from employee compensation, proprietor income, indirect business taxes, households, and corporations. For 100,000 feeder pigs retained and finished in Missouri, this scenario would stimulate $185 thousand in state and local taxes to Missouri and $288 thousand in federal taxes (Exhibits 5 and 6) 7

Exhibit 5 Annual Tax Impact of 100,000 Feeder Pigs Retained and Finished in Missouri - State and Local Taxes Description Total Dividends $669 Social Insurance Tax (Employee and Employer) $2,086 Indirect Business Tax (Sales, Property, Vehicle, Other) $150,810 Corporate Profits Tax $7,539 Personal Tax (Income, Property, Vehicle, Other) $24,175 Total State and Local Tax $185,280 Note: May not sum due to rounding Exhibit 6 Annual Tax Impact of 100,000 Feeder Pigs Retained and Finished in Missouri - Federal Taxes Description Total Social Insurance Tax (Employee and Employer) $94,026 Indirect Business Tax (Excise, Custom Duty, Other) $29,610 Corporate Profits Tax $107,190 Personal Tax (Income Tax) $56,827 Total Federal Tax $287,654 Note: May not sum due to rounding Annual Impact from Various Levels of Feeder Pigs Retained and Finished in Missouri Based on methodology developed in the previous section, an extrapolation of what the annual economic impacts would be for various amounts of feeder pigs being retained and finished was estimated in Exhibit 7. These impacts are based on the cumulative of the direct, indirect and induced economic effects. Exhibit 7 Annual Total Impact of Feeder Pigs Retained and Finished in Missouri Number of Employment Labor Income Value Added Output Taxes Pigs (jobs) (millions) (millions) (millions) (millions) 100,000 110.1 $1.0 $2.7 $5.1 $0.5 500,000 550.3 $5.0 $13.5 $25.7 $2.4 1,000,000 1,100.7 $9.9 $27.0 $51.4 $4.7 2,000,000 2,201.3 $19.8 $53.9 $102.7 $9.5 8