Hydraulic Fracturing 101 Federal Regulatory Perspective SDWA/CWA. Presentation for the. ADEM Ground Water Conference

Similar documents
Hydraulic Fracturing 101

Natural Gas Extraction. Key Environmental Issues in US EPA Region 2 May 29, 2014

We weren t planning to talk about it, but since you asked... CEE With special thanks to Dr. Brian Rahm of the NY State Water Resources Institute

Lifecycle Water Management Considerations & Challenges for Marcellus Shale Gas Development

WATER AND SHALE GAS DEVELOPMENT

Memorandum July Task Force on Ensuring Stable Natural Gas Markets BPC Staff Lourdes Long Water Impacts Associated with Shale Gas Development

EARTHWORKS HYDRAULIC FRACTURING 101

FEDERAL ROLE IN REGULATING HYDRAULIC FRACTURING

Natural Gas. Hydraulic Fracturing 101. NC Energy Policy Issues Committee February 15 th, 2012

Potential Relationships Between Hydraulic Fracturing and Drinking Water Resources

The Regulation of Shale Gas Development in the U.S.

Chapter 9. Water Sourcing and Wastewater Disposal for Marcellus Shale Development in Pennsylvania

Session 2, Water Supply and Quality The Regulatory Framework June 5, Richard E. Schwartz Crowell & Moring LLP

Update on EPA s Clean Water Act Review of the Coalbed Methane (CBM) Industrial Sector. Overview for OK Independent Petroleum Association April 3, 2008

Considerations for hydraulic fracturing and groundwater and surface water protection: lessons learned in the U.S.

Hydraulic Fracturing: Selected Legal Issues

WATER RESOURCES ISSUES RELATED TO SHALE GAS DEVELOPMENT

Water Issues Relating to Unconventional Oil and Gas Production

EPA s Underground Injection Control Program Overview. Solid Waste Advisory Committee Meeting June 5, 2014

Core Value. Unconventional Gas Production and Water Resources: Lessons from the U.S. Brisbane, Sydney & Canberra, Australia February 27 March 1, 2012

Water Availability and Management in Shale Gas Operations

Natural Gas Reform Campaign

Hydraulic Fracturing and UDSW protection ALL Consulting Lead author: J. Daniel Arthur Contributing authors: Bill Hochheiser, and Brian Bohm

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION OFFICE OF OIL & GAS MANAGEMENT

2.4.1 NATURAL RESOURCES CASE STUDY: WHAT THE FRACK?

Shale gas & Hydraulic fracturing. Dr. Jürg M. Matter Ocean & Earth Science University of Southampton

Drilling for Natural Gas in the Marcellus and Utica Shales: Environmental Regulatory Basics

Shale Gas and Hydraulic Fracturing: CRS Experts

Impact of Unconventional Natural Gas Drilling Operations on the Environment and Public Health Industry Practices and Perspectives

Opportunities and Freight Transportation Needs from Marcellus and Utica in Ohio

Bryan Swistock Water Resources Extension Specialist Penn State University

Proposed New 18 CFR Part Hydraulic Fracturing in Shale and Other Formations:

Fracturing Overview: Fact vs. Fiction Andy Bond, Subsurface Manager December 8,

Table of Contents See also Summary of Contents on the previous page.

New York State Regulatory/Permitting Process and Practical Considerations for Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTWs) to Treat Flowback Water

EPA s Study of the Potential Impacts of Hydraulic Fracturing on Drinking Water Resources

Southern California Society For Risk Analysis 26th Annual Workshop May 30, 2013

Geologic Sequestration Rules: A Multi-Stakeholder Perspective

DAVID SPEARS STATE GEOLOGIST

Environmental Protection and Marcellus Shale Well Development. Scott Perry Director Bureau of Oil and Gas Management

The Pennsylvania State University. The Graduate School. College of Agricultural Sciences BARRIERS TO IMPROVING IMPLEMENTATION OF

Outline 1. Introduction and background

The (Re) Federalization of Fracking Regulation. Michael Burger April 19, 2013

Natural Gas- Green, Homegrown Energy for Virginia. Greg Kozera. President, Virginia Oil and Gas Association

Program: Proposed Coal Bed Methane (CBM) Study Design August 25, 2000

Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Oil and Gas Extraction Point

October 7, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Water Docket 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW Washington DC 20460

Regulatory Issues Affecting Management of Produced Water from Coal Bed Methane Wells. John A. Veil Argonne National Laboratory

Chapter 3 Wastewater Management Regulation in the Appalachian Basin

Hinckley Seniors Group January 2, 2012

Development in the United States: Water Issues

SHALE DRILLING. Linda Nicholson and Colleagues November 11, 2009

Water Resource Management for Shale Energy Development

The Fracking Facts. What is fracking? The issues. Questions and discussion

Monitoring and Remediation in Shale energy plays. Dr. Zacariah L. Hildenbrand, Inform Environmental, LLC

EPA s Clean Water Act Review of the Coalbed Methane (CBM) Industrial Sector. Stakeholder Teleconferences June 2007

Study of the Potential Impacts of Hydraulic Fracturing on Drinking Water Resources PROGRESS REPORT

MARCELLUS SHALE ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY UPDATE: WATER AND WASTE

Water Sourcing and Recycling in Oil & Gas Operations. Michael Sims, P.E. Technical Permitting, Oil &Gas Division Main Line:

Facts of Myths of the Marcellus Shale: A Scientific Perspective

Protecting Water, Producing Gas

Hydraulic Fracturing For Gas What Would It Mean for NC?

Rick Henderson, Field Operations Supervisor DEQ Office of Oil, Gas, and Minerals

Evaluating the Acceptability of Gas Well Development and Production- Related Wastewater at New York Wastewater Treatment Plants 5/16/11

The Honorable Mayor and City Council Members. Environmental Stewardship Advisory Commission. Hydraulic Fracturing. DATE: January 17, 2014

The Opportunities, Challenges, and Unknowns of Shale Gas Exploration

REVIEW OF THE AQUIFER EXEMPTION PROCESS, HISTORY AND IMPLEMENTATION RELATED TO GROUNDWATER PROTECTION AND USE

A MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT Between. The United States Environmental Protection Agency. And

Hydraulic Fracturing of Coalbed Methane Wells: A Threat to Drinking Water

The Marcellus Shale Safe Drilling Initiative:

California Well Stimulation Treatment Regulations

Tribal Lands and Environment: A National Forum on Solid Waste, Emergency Response, Contaminated Sites

Shale Revolution Creates Challenge & Opportunity for Water. Gray Peckham Coastal Consulting Concepts February 2012

Hydraulic Fracturing of Shales: Water Contamination Risks, Wastewater Management Strategies, and Emerging Research Challenges

Department of the Environment

Shale Play Hydraulic Fracturing: Water Quality and Supply Issues

Recycle Project of Produced Water Westwater Utah Project

Fracture Stimulation Just the Facts, Ma am

Implementation of Underground Injection Control Program Regulations for Class V Shallow Disposal Systems

DRINKING WATER. EPA Needs to Collect Information and Consistently Conduct Activities to Protect Underground Sources of Drinking Water

Prepared For: Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection PA DEP. Prepared By: The Shale Alliance for Energy Research, Pennsylvania SAFER PA

Facts of Myths of the Marcellus Shale: A Scientific Perspective

J. Daniel Arthur, P.E., ALL Consulting. Author. Ground Water Protection Council January 2009 San Antonio, Texas. Presented at

Water for Onshore Oil & Gas

Shale gas environmental issues: A Natural Resource Perspective. John Quigley John H Quigley, LLC

Paul Ziemkiewicz, PhD, Director WVU Water Research Institute NORM Workshop Columbus OH 12 May 14 SHALE GAS: RADIOACTIVITY IN SOLID AND LIQUID WASTES

Division Mandates. Supervise the drilling, operation, and maintenance of wells to prevent damage to life, health, property, and natural resources.

Marcellus Shale Public Outreach Marcellus Shale Coalition 1 MARCELLUS SHALE COALITION

Water Management for Hydraulic Fracturing in Unconventional Resources Part 1

The State of Hydraulic Fracturing in CA: Where Are We, and Where Are We Going?

Hydraulic Fracturing & Public Health: What we know, what we can infer and how we can move forward

Fracking Waste in New York: What is Fracking Waste?

Risks Related to Water and Wastewater for an Oil and Gas Company

GAS WELL/WATER WELL SUBSURFACE CONTAMINATION

The proposed rulemaking does not address items required to protect Pennsylvania residents from water, air and noise pollution.

New Information on Produced Water Volumes and Management Practices. John Veil

Impoundments for Cost-Effective Recycling of Produced Water for Hydraulic Fracturing

Trends, Issues and Market Changes for Crude Oil and Natural Gas

Department of Conservation Division of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Resources Bill Bartling Inland District Deputy

Enhanced Coal Bed Methane (CBM) Recovery and CO 2 Sequestration in an Unmineable Coal Seam

Transcription:

Hydraulic Fracturing 101 Federal Regulatory Perspective SDWA/CWA Presentation for the ADEM Ground Water Conference June 5, 2013 Fred McManus, U.S. EPA, Region 4 1

Hydraulic Fracturing 101 Fred McManus - EPA, Region 4 Larry Cole/Karrie-Jo Shell - EPA, Region 4 Karen Johnson - EPA, Region 3 Brian Graves - EPA, Region 6 Chitra Kumar - EPA, HQ Marvin Combs - KY Div. of Oil and Gas Dave Bolin/Butch Gregory - AL Oil & Gas Board Ron Tarbutton - MS Oil & Gas Board Jamie Crawford MS DEQ Scotty Sorrells - TDEC Evan Kane - NCDENR Jim Kennedy GA State Geologist 1

Hydraulic Fracturing 101 Hydraulic fracturing is a well stimulation process used to maximize the extraction of subsurface resources oil, natural gas, and geothermal energy. The process includes the acquisition of source water, well construction, well stimulation, and waste disposal. 1

HF Fluid - Typical Chemical Makeup 1

Coalbed Methane - Hydraulic Fracturing 5 2

Vertical vs. Horizontal Drilling

7

Dan River Basin Deep River Basin with modifications by Bill Holman

Importance of Natural Gas U.S. Energy Independence U.S. has some of the largest shale gas plays in the world 95% of natural gas consumed in the U.S. in 2011 was produced domestically* Natural gas production expected to increase by 44% by 2040; primarily due to shale gas* Cleaner burning 45% less CO 2 than coal Used to heat homes, generate electricity, industry, etc. *Source: Energy Information Administration, Annual Energy Outlook 2013

10

Shale Gas - Statistics Currently accounts for 14% of the U.S. natural gas supply Projected to make up 20% of the U.S. natural gas supply by 2020 Projected to make up 45% of the U.S. natural gas supply by 2035

Coalbed Methane Statistics & U.S. Gas Supplies 2009 Shale gas 14% Coalbed methane 8% Other Gas Sources 50% Coalbed methane provides 8.0% of natural gas supplies Tight Gas sands 28% Note: Most, but not all CBM wells are hydraulically fractured Typical CBM Well: Eastern basins, wells receive 2-3 fractures over lifetime Life of well is between 4-15 years Fracture event lasts approximately 1-2 hours; Fracture heights and length are usually measured in 10s - 100s of feet Average gas production is 97 MM cubic feet per year (enough to heat approximately 1,164 homes/year) Cost of well: $500,000; Cost of fracture: $50,000 Source: U.S. Department of Energy; EPA Study of Hydraulic Fracturing

Alabama Coalbed Methane Activity Alabama - Over 7,500 wells drilled/hf - Hydraulic fracturing used to enhance methane production from coal seams - Nearly 35% of the total gas production in the State - Cumulative production exceeds 2 TCF - Coalbed methane production HAS averaged from about 86 to 125 BCF annually

Kentucky Shale Gas Activity 6,000+ shale gas wells in southeastern KY (Upper Devonian - Huron and Cleveland) - Liquid nitrogen and hydrochloric acid (500 gal.) are fracturing fluids - Mostly dry gas but some saltwater is produced - Produced water/brine disposed via UIC Class II permitted injection wells - Initial production about 750 MCF/day

KNOTT CO., KY 18 Stage: Devonian Shale Horizontal Frac Treatment using Nitrogen Kentucky Shale Gas Activity

Kentucky Shale Gas Activity KNOTT CO., KY 18 Stage: Devonian Shale Horizontal Frac Treatment using Nitrogen 50 bbl. polyurethane tank for produced fluids TWIN-WELL PAD PERRY COUNTY, KY

AL, MS, TN, GA Shale Gas Activity 20 exploratory wells in AL Conasauga shale - No sustained commercial production 41 exploratory wells in Floyd/Chattanooga shale in 5 counties in north/western AL - No sustained commercial production About 10 exploratory wells in north MS - Floyd/Neal shale - No sustained commercial production Exploratory wells in southwestern MS - Tuscaloosa marine shale - Initial production 500-1,000 BOD + Gas+ Water

AL, MS, TN, GA Shale Gas Activity About 100 wells in the Chattanooga shale in TN - Primary fracturing agent is nitrogen - Minimal produced water One rank wildcat well drilling and one proposed in the Conasauga shale play of northeast GA - Wells are vertical - No plans to hydraulically fracture the formation at this time

Potential Environmental Issues/ Areas of Concern Drilling/hydraulic fracturing requires 2-20 million gallons water - Alteration of hydrologic regime Propagation of fractures in confining layer - Fracturing fluid into overlying USDW - Lower quality, more saline water into higher quality USDW Flowback fluids (brine, hydrocarbons, chemicals, surfactants, minerals/metals, radionuclides) - Improper treatment/disposal - Difficult for POTWs to treat - Pre-treatment may not be adequate - Negative impacts to DW/PWSs (disinfection by-products) 11

Potential Environmental Issues/ Seepage/runoff/leaks Areas of Concern - Bad casing/cementing jobs and other inappropriate drilling/hydrofracing/production methods (lack of BMPs) 11

CWA Current NPDES Regulation For direct dischargers of unconventional oil and gas wastewaters from onshore oil and gas facilities with the exception of coalbed methane technology-based limitations are based on the Effluent Limitations Guidelines (ELGs) for the Oil and Gas Extraction Category (40 CFR Part 435). Permits for onshore oil and gas facilities must include the requirements in Part 435 A ban on the discharge of pollutants, except for wastewater that is of good enough quality for use in agricultural and wildlife propagation for those onshore facilities located in the continental US and west of the 98th meridian. 11

CWA Proposed Revision to ELGs EPA is developing a proposed rule to amend the Effluent Limitations Guidelines (ELGs) for the Oil and Gas Extraction Category, (40 CFR Part 435). Revise Part 435 to address discharges from coalbed methane and from shale gas extraction. The proposed rule is scheduled for publication in 2014. 11

EPA s Underground Injection Control (UIC) Program The UIC Program provides a regulatory framework to ensure protection of USDWs from endangerment related to underground injection activities - Class II wells are associated with oil and gas production - 2005 amendment to SDWA requires a permit for hydraulic fracturing when diesel fuels are used in fracturing fluids or propping agents - Diesel fuels may be used as a carrier fluid or added to other HF fluids to adjust fluid properties (e.g., viscosity and lubricity) - Chemicals of concern in diesel fuels include benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes (BTEX)

2005 Energy Policy Act The 2005 Energy Policy Act excluded oil and gas hydraulic fracturing from UIC regulation under the SDWA except when diesel fuels are used in fracturing fluids and/or propping agents (SDWA 1421(d)(1)(B)(ii)). SDWA 1421 (d)(1) The term underground injection - means the subsurface emplacement of fluids by well injection; and excludes - the underground injection of natural gas for purposes of storage; and - the underground injection of fluids or propping agents (other than diesel fuels) pursuant to HF operations related to oil, gas, or geothermal production activities

Actions to Address Concerns EPA s hydraulic fracturing study EPA s UIC permitting guidance for HF using diesel fuels (draft ) EPA s Office of Wastewater Management memo (3/17/11) EPA is currently developing a proposed rule to amend ELGs (40 CFR Part 435) Congressional investigations/reports Inquiries to EPA from Congressmen/Senators

Actions to Address Concerns Proposed state legislation Media reports NC s existing rules prevent directional drilling/hydraulic fracturing; NC study/report and passage of Act PA DEP set a deadline of 5/19/11 for operators to stop bringing HF waste to wastewater treatment plants

EPA s Hydraulic Fracturing Study The overall purpose of the Study is to understand the relationship between hydraulic fracturing and drinking water resources Scope of proposed research includes the full lifespan of water in HF: - Acquisition of water - Mixing of chemicals - Actual fracturing - Post-fracturing stage

EPA s Hydraulic Fracturing Study December 2012 - EPA released report on progress in its Study of the Potential Impacts of Hydraulic Fracturing on Drinking Water Resources http://www2.epa.gov/hfstudy

EPA s Draft UIC Guidance for Hydraulic Fracturing Using Diesel Fuels Purpose of Guidance - Describe current Class II oil and gas injection requirements under SDWA and UIC regulations - Provide a description of diesel fuels for the purposes of UIC Program implementation - Provide recommendations to EPA permit writers for how to apply Class II requirements to HF

EPA s Draft UIC Guidance for Hydraulic Fracturing Using Diesel Fuels Draft Guidance Applicability - Class II permit is required prior to injection - Does not create new regulations: Technical recommendations in guidance intended for EPA UIC program permit writers issuing Class II permits (Region 4 - KY, FL and TN) - Technical guidelines generally consistent with state guidelines - Not intended to limit or supersede state authority or oversight of oil/gas permitting activities - State UIC programs (review and consider)

EPA s Draft UIC Guidance for Hydraulic Fracturing Using Diesel Fuels The draft guidance, press release, and link to the Federal Register Notice are available on EPA s website at http://water.epa.gov/type/groundwater/uic/class 2/hydraulicfracturing/hydraulic-fracturing.cfm EPA received 97,000+ comments (2,734 unique) Working with stakeholders to finalize the guidance Hope to finalize guidance this summer (2013)

Take Home Message U.S. demand for energy will continue to grow Coalbed methane/shale gas and oil exploration and production activities will continue to increase Coalbed methane/shale gas and oil extraction activities have the potential to impact the environment and public health Coordination between state and federal agencies to ensure protection of environment (USDWs/sources of DW) and public health States/stakeholders utilize guidance documents and participate in review of HF Study results

Hydraulic Fracturing 101 Federal Regulatory Perspective SDWA/CWA Questions?

Hydraulic Fracturing 101 Federal Regulatory Perspective SDWA/CWA Contact - Fred McManus mcmanus.fred@epa.gov (404) 562-9385