S.R. 0070, Section T20. Engineering District ASHE National Project of the Year Award

Similar documents
I 75 PD&E STUDIES TABLE OF CONTENTS DTTM, TECHNICAL REPORT No. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS

Conceptual Design Report

APPENDIX B. Excerpts from the October 2002 Conceptual Alternatives Report

SR 0136-G10 ABC BRIDGE REPLACEMENT in Eighty Four, PA

FOR INTERSTATE 81 AND ROUTE 37 INTERCHANGE FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA MILEPOST 310

Engineering Design Services for Safety Improvements along CR 476 from the Hernando County Line to US 301 (SR 35) Sumter County, Florida

WELCOME. Public Meeting for I-35 / I-44 Interchange. October 6, 2015

CHAPTER 4 GRADE SEPARATIONS AND INTERCHANGES

Conclusions & Lessons Learned

5/11/2016 SR 15 SECTION 088 CSVT SOUTHERN SECTION SR 15 SECTION 088 CSVT SOUTHERN SECTION AGENDA

CHAPTER 5 PARALLEL PARKWAY CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS

DRAFT. SR-60 7 th Avenue Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) I-605 Corridor Improvement Project (CIP) I-605/SR-60 EA# 3101U0

Diverging Diamond Interchanges in Michigan

Welcome and thank you for spending time with us today to talk about the 75 th Street Corridor Improvement Project.

Overall project. The $288 million Phase 2 DesignBuild project starts construction. this spring, with completion by December 31, 2016

DDI s Can Move More Than Cars. Alex Ariniello. Presentation for the ITE Western District Annual Meeting. July, 2016 in Albuquerque, New Mexico

I-65/I-70 North Split Interchange Reconstruction Project Frequently Asked Questions

500 Interchange Design

The Folded Interchange: An Unconventional Design for the Reconstruction of Cloverleaf Interchanges

US 14 EIS (New Ulm to N. Mankato) Interchange and Intersection Type Comparison

Informational Brochure. Proposed Interchange. Interstate Route 295 (I-295) AT Greenville Avenue (State Route 5) Town of Johnston, Rhode Island

Reconstruction Project Update

CHAPTER 3 SCOPE SUMMARY

Community Advisory Committee Meeting No. 2. June 22, 2006

Highway Construction Program

500 Interchange Design

Interchange Design. Nick Hoernke, Bill Roth and Eric Sorensen

University Region FY 2023 Final Scoping Package

TRANSPORTATION PROJECT REPORT DRAFT CONCEPTUAL ACCESS MODIFICATION PROPOSAL OCTOBER 2002

MEMORANDUM: INITIAL CONCEPTS SUMMARY

CLA /10.54, PID Project Description:

ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS RECEIVED THROUGH 11:00 A.M. ON JANUARY 4, 2019:

NW La Center Road/I-5 Interchange Improvement Project (MP 16.80)

Steve Haines, P.E., Parsons, (303) , James Studer, Kiewit, (926) ,

PROPOSED AMENDMENT OF THE I 76 INTEGRATED CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT PROJECT TO THE CONNECTIONS 2040 PLAN FOR GREATER PHILADELPHIA

Appendix C. Wetland Impact Assessment and Two-Part Finding. I-94 St. Michael to Albertville Minnesota Department of Transportation

FY STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM New Jersey Department of Transportation Project Descriptions ($ millions)

Traffic Technical Memorandum: Hickman Road over Tuolumne River Bridge Replacement Project, Stanislaus County (BRLO-5938(199))

I-65/I-70 North Split Project

STRUCTURE AND BRIDGE DIVISION

I-65/I-70 North Split Project. Alternatives Screening Report CAC Meeting October 9, 2018

9.0 I-26 & I-526 Interchange Improvements

Rapid City, SD HDR Project No RE: Replacement of Existing I-190 Twin Bridges at I-190/Silver Street Interchange, Rapid City, SD

UNION CENTRE BLVD AND I-75 INTERCHANGE WEST CHESTER, OHIO

Interchange Workshop Report (August 2004)

PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE/ CONCEPTUAL MITIGATION/ CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION CONCURRENCE PACKAGE. US 219 IMPROVEMENT PROJECT From I-68 to Old Salisbury Road

DESIGN OF CAMPBELL ROAD OVERPASS IN KELOWNA. Yulin Gao, M.A.Sc., P.Eng., SNC-Lavalin Inc. Samson Chan, M.Eng., P. Eng., SNC-Lavalin Inc.

WELCOME IL 47. Community Advisory Group Meeting #5 Waubonsee Community College Wednesday, May 31, 2017

I-95/US 322 Interchange Improvement Project. Website Update

I-35/I-80/Iowa 141 Interchange IJR and NEPA A Practical Approach to Resolving a Decades-Old Traffic Operations Challenge

NORTHWEST CORRIDOR PROJECT. NOISE TECHNICAL REPORT 2015 Addendum Phase IV

On behalf of the Carolina Crossroads project team we thank you for taking the time to attend this meeting.

NEPA and Design Public Hearings

2018 ACEC OF FLORIDA FICE OUTSTANDING PROJECT AWARDS (OPA) PROGRAM PROJECT NOMINATION FORM

2 Purpose and Need. 2.1 Study Area. I-81 Corridor Improvement Study Tier 1 Draft Environmental Impact Statement

DEVELOPMENT, ANALYSIS, AND DESIGN OF A NEW PARKWAY AT GRADE INTERSECTION (PAGI)

APPENDIX A TIER 1 ANALYSIS

DRAFT AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Air Quality Analysis Technical Memorandum

Review of Plans and Specs from a Constructability Perspective

Summary. Preliminary Alternative Development and Screening. DEIS July 23, 2018

FY STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM New Jersey Department of Transportation Project Descriptions ($ millions)

I-64 Capacity Improvements Segment I Financial Plan Annual Update

INTERCHANGE MODIFICATION REPORT

Active Traffic Management in Michigan. Patrick Johnson, P.E. HNTB Michigan Inc.

IH 30/IH 35E Reconstruction Project Pegasus Final Technical Memorandum - Evaluation of Conceptual Alternatives Task 7.5

Interchange Improvements at the Queen Elizabeth Way and Glendale Avenue

Chapter 4: Transportation and Circulation

WOO-SR Feasibility Study (PID 90541) Feasibility Study Report April 22, 2011

Project Initiation Form

SPECIAL PROVISION Detours, Barricades, Warning Signs, Sequence of Work, etc.

NJTPA Transportation Improvement Program Fiscal Years

Transportation Management Plan

Chapter URBAN & RURAL FREEWAY DESIGN

Alternatives Evaluation Report. Appendix C. Alternatives Evaluation Report

INTERCHANGE SAFETY. Steve Allen. Houston Daugherty. Director, Strategic Transportation Investments Division (TDOT)

St. Francis Drive through the City of Santa Fe Corridor Study

THE PROJECT. Executive Summary. City of Industry. City of Diamond Bar. 57/60 Confluence.

SPECIAL PROVISION Description of Project, Scope of Contract, and Sequence of Work

DESIGN SOLUTIONS FOR THE SOUTH TRI-STATE TOLL HIGHWAY (M.P. 0 TO M.P. 3.6) AUGUST 13-16, 2006

3.6 Construction Methods

Michael Lamplugh, Sr., PLS Vice President

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Planning and Environmental Management Office INTERCHANGE MODIFICATION REPORT

SR 15 SECTION 088 CSVT SOUTHERN SECTION PUBLIC MEETING MAY 25, 2017

I-10 CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS STAGE 0 FEASIBILITY STUDY STATE PROJECT NUMBER H FEDERAL AID PROJECT NUMBER H004100

Design-Build and Design-Bid-Build

GEOMETRIC DESIGN CRITERIA for Non-freeway Resurfacing, Restoration, and Rehabilitation Projects

ALBION FLATS DEVELOPMENT EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS AND POTENTIAL IMPACTS

Appendix C - Highway 400 Widening and Interchange Evaluation Summary Tables

Oklahoma Department of Transportation Environmental Programs Division Office Fax

Diverging Diamond Interchanges and their Relation to Sustainable Design

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Part 1 Introduction

2018 ACEC OF FLORIDA OUTSTANDING PROJECT AWARDS (OPA) PROGRAM PROJECT NOMINATION FORM

ASSOCIATED PENNSYLVANIA CONSTRUCTORS SUPPLEMENTAL ECMS ADVANCED INFORMATION LETTING MAY 24, 2018 (ALL WORK TO BE COMPLETED TO APPEAR IN THE PROPOSAL)

I-64 Capacity Improvements Segment I Financial Plan Annual Update December 1, 2017

SOUTH MEDFORD INTERCHANGE BRIDGES

Hampton Roads Bridge-Tunnel Expansion Feasibility Study. Design Considerations

Section 3-01 General Concepts, Design Standards and Design Exceptions TABLE OF CONTENTS

FINDINGS OF FACT and CONCLUSIONS

Exit 73 I-29 Interchange Modification Justification Study

Transcription:

S.R. 0070, Section T20 Engineering District 12-0 ASHE National Project of the Year Award

AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HIGHWAY ENGINEERS National Project of the Year Award OFFICIAL ENTRY FORM AWARD CATEGORY (Check One): Under $20 Million X Over $20 Million SPONSORING REGION (Check One): X Northeast Mid-Atlantic Southeast Great Lakes North Central South Central Northwest Rocky Mountain Southwest CONTACT INFORMATION FOR SPONSORING REGION: Primary Contact Name: Richard Cochrane, PE ASHE Region Position: Secretary, Northeast Region Phone (Office): 610.841.2700 Phone (Mobile): 484.225.4358 E-Mail Address: rcochrane@mctish.com Secondary Contact Name: Scott Eshenaur ASHE Region Position: NPAC Chairperson Phone (Office): 717.790.9565 Phone (Mobile): 717.580.8426 E-Mail Address: sreshenaur@modjeski.com PROJECT INFORMATION (From Section Entry): ENTERING AGENCY/COMPANY S NAME: Gannett Fleming, Inc. PROJECT NAME: S.R. 0070, Section T20 (I-79 N.J. to S.R. 136) TYPE: Highway Construction PROJECT LOCATION: South Strabane Township, Pennsylvania CITY: Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania COUNTY: Washington County, Pennsylvania CONSTRUCTION COST: $49,135,000 BUDGETED CONSTRUCTION COST: $51,268,386 PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: January 21, 2018 PROJECT OWNER: Pennsylvania Department of Transportation, Engineering District 12-0 STREET ADDRESS: 825 North Gallatin Avenue Ext. CITY: Uniontown STATE: Pennsylvania ZIP: 15401-2105 PHONE: 724.439.7336 FAX: 724.439.2331 CONTACT PERSON: E-MAIL ADDRESS: Barry Lyons, PE blyons@pa.gov PROJECT DESIGN FIRM: Gannett Fleming, Inc. STREET ADDRESS: Foster Plaza 8, Suite 400, 730 Holiday Drive CITY: Pittsburgh STATE: Pennsylvania ZIP: 15220 PHONE: 412.922.5575, x5320 FAX: 412.922.3717 CONTACT PERSON: David Kozel, PE E-MAIL ADDRESS: dkozel@gfnet.com PRIME CONTRACTOR: Golden Triangle Construction Company STREET ADDRESS: 8555 Old Steubenville Pike CITY: Imperial STATE: Pennsylvania ZIP: 15216 PHONE: 724.828.2800 FAX: 724.828.2828 CONTACT PERSON: E-MAIL ADDRESS: Eric Klimas, PE eklimas@gtcpgh.com Entry Form Completed By: David Kozel, PE Date: January 29, 2018

1 S.R. 0070, Section T20 Award Category: Greater than $20,000,000 Focused on increasing safety and mobility throughout the Interstate 70 (I 70) corridor, Section T20 improvements involved reconstructing and widening nearly 1.5 miles of I 70 between I 79 North Junction and S.R. 136 (Beau Street) and reconfiguring the interchange between I 70 and Route 19. The existing substandard cloverleaf interchange at the Route 19 Murtland Avenue was replaced with a Diverging Diamond Interchange (DDI), the first in Pennsylvania. Photo 1 Aerial view of the completed DDI. In addition, I 70 was widened to add a third lane in each direction for additional capacity. Between the Route 19 interchange and Route 136 interchange, I 70 was widened to four lanes in each direction for auxiliary lanes between the ramps. I 70 and Route 19 combine to average 98,000 vehicles per day. As the result of adding a third lane westbound on I 70 and widening of the I 79 northbound ramp, a major fork condition was formed, creating a new decision lane for motorists. The new lane increases safety by providing an easier turn across traffic. COMPLEXITY When the DDI concept was selected, there were minimal design guidelines available and DDI examples were limited. Designs also were based on relatively flat grades and tangent alignments. The Route 19 DDI was in a reverse horizontal curve condition, residing on an upgrade ranging from 3 to 5 percent, with a vertical crest curve just north of I 70. To address this challenge, the project team designed Route 19 on a plane and provided 2 percent superelevation. The design also required adequate drainage with a 2 percent minimum slope in any direction to avoid stormwater ponding on the travel lanes. In September 2016, the DDI temporary traffic pattern was implemented enabling final completion, including shoulder areas, curbed islands, and ramp islands. This required permanent signalization to be operational and placement of temporary signing and pavement markings. To maintain two lanes of traffic on I 70 and Route 19 during peak periods from 6 a.m. to 8 p.m. daily, an extensive traffic control plan was developed and implemented throughout three years of construction. Staging was further complicated by the need to maintain access at the interchanges, requiring temporary ramps and cross overs. The plan required 12 foot lane widths on I 70, except over existing bridges, to account for heavy truck traffic. Stage 1 (2015 2017): Construction of Route 19 and the DDI, containing six sub stages. This staging allowed ramp construction to occur while the connections between I 70 and Route 19 remained accessible. Stage 2 (2015): Focused on the eastbound side of I 70 with five sub stages. The eastbound traffic was split with one lane crossing over to the westbound side to maintain traffic. When the eastbound bridge over Route 19 was redecked, a second cross over was implemented to place all four I 70 travel lanes on the westbound bridge over Route 19.

2 S.R. 0070, Section T20 Award Category: Greater than $20,000,000 Stage 3 (2016): Construction of the westbound side, containing three sub stages, with traffic shifted to the completed eastbound side. This allowed the contractor to work on the entire westbound side, including the bridges. Three temporary interchange configurations, with temporary ramps and signals, were implemented to maintain access between I 70 and Route 19. A trumpet interchange used existing ramps on the west side of Route 19, allowing construction of new ramps on the eastern side of Route 19. The second temporary configuration reverted to the cloverleaf while constructing the middle portion of Route 19. The third involved implementing a long term temporary diamond configuration to complete Route 19 and the remaining ramps. The existing dual three span bridges over Route 19 remained in place. To extend serviceable life, the bridges were redecked and a new barrier was Photo 4 View of reconstructed I 70 looking added, meeting interstate requirements. To address its east toward Route 19. substandard vertical clearance of 14 feet, 2 inches, the westbound bridge was raised to achieve a vertical clearance of 16 feet, 6 inches. During construction, the existing steel beams were removed and repainted, eliminating jacking and temporary support needs. In addition to complex traffic sequencing, DDI innovation, and right of way accommodations, Section T20 featured a range of design elements: point of access study utility relocations DDI design collaboration highway lighting and two new traffic signals structure design five adjacent traffic signal upgrades signing and pavement markings intelligent transportation system relocation erosion and sediment pollution control geotechnical investigations stormwater management environmental clearance roadway drainage noise investigation and agency permitting. NEW APPLICATIONS OF EXISTING TECHNIQUES/ORIGINALITY/INNOVATION Constructed in 1960, functionally obsolete, and surrounded by commercial development, the original Route 19 interchange was a substandard cloverleaf interchange that could not be upgraded without incurring significant commercial property impacts. The current average daily traffic counts are 70,000 for I 70, including heavy truck traffic, and 28,000 for Route 19. To improve safety and minimize traffic impacts, the DDI was designed and constructed as an innovative application of existing techniques, resulting in a first in state engineering feat. The project was made possible by a collaborative effort between PennDOT, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), the design team, and the contractor.

3 S.R. 0070, Section T20 Award Category: Greater than $20,000,000 Photo 2 Southern DDI intersection crossovers and islands. The DDI features three main advantages compared to a standard diamond interchange: 1. Traffic on Route 19 crosses over to the opposite side of the roadway, improving traffic flow. 2. Left turn movements from Route 19 to the I 70 entrance ramps are free flowing; eliminating the need to cross opposing travel lanes and reducing traffic platooning at the entrance ramps. This eliminated the need for dual left turn lanes to entrance ramps. 3. When turning left from the I 70 exit ramps, the need to cross lanes was eliminated, providing better access to Route 19. In addition to curbed islands, signals, signing, and markings to guide traffic and provide a safer environment, the DDI: Is expected to reduce the number of traffic conflict points from 26 to 14, when compared to a standard diamond interchange. Saved millions by avoiding replacement of Route 19 s dual bridges. Enabled the majority of DDI construction to occur within existing interchange right of way. Allowed traffic flow during construction, keeping businesses accessible without detours. Only required two phase traffic signals at the ramp intersections, compared to conventional signal phasing configurations. Photo 3 DDI crosses Route 19 traffic to the left side of the roadway. SOCIAL/ECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS The project eliminated a substandard condition and increased capacity, resulting in a safer and more efficient interstate for the public. During design development, a primary goal was to minimize right of way impacts. Reconstructing the cloverleaf interchange to meet current standards would have resulted in significant commercial property impact and excessive costs. To minimize impacts, the I 70 widening extended into the existing median and the DDI layout was primarily contained within the existing interchange footprint. The project also utilized concrete barriers at the outside shoulder instead of full swales to reduce disturbance. Businesses were not displaced as a result of this collaborative effort, and strip takes on only eight parcels were required. To improve public perception and engagement, Gannett Fleming developed a DDI brochure for distribution and an informational video presented during public meetings. The video includes windshield view animations, clearly explaining how the DDI works and its associated benefits. These are available on the project website (http://www.i 70projects.com/I 70andI 79NorthJunction.html).

4 S.R. 0070, Section T20 Award Category: Greater than $20,000,000 SAFETY With improved connections between I 70 and Route 19, Section T20 begins the process of widening I 70 for 3.5 miles from two to three lanes in each direction between the I 79 North and South Junctions. The additional lane provides extra capacity and safety while commuting through the corridor. South Strabane Township reported that only one crash occurred in the interchange since the DDI implementation in September 2016. The original cloverleaf interchange averaged 20 crashes per year. AESTHETICS AND SUSTAINABLE FEATURES Photo 5 Ramp islands with colored concrete, walkway, and decorative stone. The project implemented walkways and colored concrete in the ramp intersection island areas to match the repainted I 70 bridge beams over Route 19. A large portion of the ramp island areas included decorative stone, reducing the impervious area and improving aesthetics. New pavement and drainage systems also minimized required maintenance and increased roadway system longevity. MEETING AND EXCEEDING OWNER/CLIENT NEEDS The DDI implementation and I 70 widening met the needs of the client, minimizing impacts to adjacent properties and reducing project costs, as it did not require bridge replacements along I 70. Featuring a first in state DDI accomplishment, I 70 reconstruction and widening supports PennDOT s longterm mission to update a deteriorating interstate system, improve safety, and minimize motorist impacts. It also moves PennDOT one step closer to completing a 40 mile reconstruction of aging I 70 between Washington and New Stanton. "As we maintain and upgrade our infrastructure across the state, we continually look for opportunities to put improved practices to work," said PennDOT Secretary Leslie S. Richards. "This project brings together sorely needed improvements to safety and traffic movement alike." OTHER RECOGNITION No. 7 Road, 2017, Roads & Bridges Top 10 Roads Excellence in Concrete Award, 2017, Pennsylvania Aggregates and Concrete Association Diamond Certificate Award, 2017, ACEC Pennsylvania Section Civil Engineering Achievement Award, 2017, ASCE Pittsburgh Section COMMITMENT At least one representative will attend the ASHE awards presentation.

Photo 1: Seen here, I-70 and Route 19 interchange looking north. The project s Diverging Diamond Interchange (DDI) solution emerged as the leading design innovation and the rst DDI constructed in enns lvania, ene tting the travelling pu lic in ashington ount. It reduces tra c con ict points, saved ta -pa er mone avoiding dual I-70 mainline ridge replacement over Route 19, and avoided the need for Route 19 dual left-turn lanes onto the I-70 entrance ramps. It also minimized commercial right-of-wa impacts and allowed tra c to ow during construction.

Photo 2:

Photo 3:

Photo 4: The aerial view of reconstructed I-70 looking east toward the Route 19 DDI. For the construction phase, two lanes of tra c on oth I-70 and Route 19 were maintained etween 00 pm and 00 am am dail through an e tensive tra c control plan. Staging was further complicated the need to maintain access at the interchanges, re uiring temporar ramps and cross-overs. The tra c control also re uired 1 -foot lane widths, e cept over e isting ridges, to account for heav truck tra c on I-70.

Photo 5: cohesiveness.

ISO 9001:2008 CERTIFIED