Appendix D Presentation Slides with Script

Similar documents
Appendix C Presentation Slides with Script

Welcome and thank you for spending time with us today to talk about the 75 th Street Corridor Improvement Project.

1. Evaluation of route and service alternatives; 2. Tier 1 Environmental Impact Analysis; and 3. Service Development Plan.

CREATE Program Overview

CREATE Program Overview. October 2015

Section IMPLEMENTATION PLAN. 7. Implementation Plan

Tier 1 EIS Round 2 Local Officials Briefing Fall 2011

Welcome and thank you for spending time with us today to talk about the 75 th Street Corridor Improvement Project.

Mental Health Awareness & Trespass Prevention Strategies

THE FUTURE OF FREIGHT RAILROADING. Joseph Schwieterman Professor, DePaul University

Long Bridge Project. Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Revised Purpose and Need

Tier 1 Environmental Impact Statement for the Chicago, Illinois, to Detroit-Pontiac,

2.0 ALTERNATIVES. 2.1 Introduction. 2.2 No Build Alternative

Section IMPLEMENTATION PLAN. 7. Implementation Plan

Tier 2 Environmental Impact Statement for the High-Speed Rail Project from Granite

1.0 INTRODUCTION Federal Mandate for State Rail Plans Stakeholder Consultation Ongoing Planning Process...

Long Bridge Project. Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Revised Purpose and Need

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM #1. The Vision, Goals and Objectives for Rail Transportation in Missouri

PURPOSE AND NEED FOR ACTION

Northern Illinois Commuter Transportation Initiative (NICTI) Locally Preferred Alternative Briefing Paper

Rail Freight and Passenger

FROM THE CHAIR By: Michael Dorweiler, AICP 2007 Chairman for the Tampa Bay Applications Group DATES TO REMEMBER

Federal Transit Administration s New Starts Process. Red Line Extension Alternatives Analysis Study

GULF COAST RAIL DISTRICT VISION FOR REGIONAL RAIL

Midwest Association of Rail Shippers Winter Meeting January 14, 2015

To provide an update on the progress of the Peel Goods Movement Task Force and Peel Goods Movement Strategic Plan.

Tier 1: Chicago to St. Louis High-Speed Rail Corridor Program

CREATE: Benefits to U.S. Seaports. American Association of Port Authorities Maritime Economic Development Workshop

Essex Junction Highway-Rail Grade Crossing Study

Summary. 1. Introduction

Twin Cities-Milwaukee-Chicago Intercity Passenger Rail Phase I Study Twin Cities- Milwaukee High Speed Rail to Chicago Corridor Study

LONG BRIDGE CAPACITY NEEDS. Oscar J. Gonzalez Virginia Railway Express Project Manager Alexandria, VA

Transportation Problems and Issues Excerpts from WWW Links

Stockton Freight & Passenger Rail Mobility Enhancement

Project Overview. A Collaborative Effort

Village Manager s Office

Livability 2050 Regional Transportation Plan Update. Transportation Policy Board (TPB) August 23, 2018

Chicago to St. Louis Tier 1 Environmental Impact Statement

Freight Work Group. May 1, :30 am 11:30 am

Frequently Asked Questions Connecting Palo Alto

Minnesota Comprehensive Statewide Freight and Passenger Rail Plan

Midtown Corridor Alternatives Analysis. Technical Advisory Committee Meeting November 15, 2012

2010 Minnesota Comprehensive Statewide Freight and Passenger Rail Plan. Minnesota Department of Transportation

Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)/ Section 106 Public Meeting Proposed Alternatives. December 14, 2017

Chicago Region Environmental and Transportation Efficiency Program. Final Feasibility Plan. Amendment 1

Introduction... 1 Florida s Rail System... 1 Rail Freight... 3 Rail Passengers... 5 Conclusions... 9

Massachusetts Rail Plan. September 16, 2010

Downtown Estes Loop Project Frequently Asked Questions

CREATE Central Corridor

SOUTHWEST LRT (METRO GREEN LINE EXTENSION)

To provide an update on the progress of the Peel Goods Movement Task Force and the Peel Goods Movement Strategic Plan.

Supports Item No. 3 T&T Committee Agenda February 17, 2009

Environmental Impact Statement; Lone Star Regional Rail Project Williamson, Travis, Bastrop, Hays, Caldwell, Comal, Guadalupe, and Bexar Counties, TX

Notice of Preparation For Link Union Station (Link US) Project. Joint Environmental Impact Statement and Environmental Impact Report

MPO/RPO Briefings. MPO/RPO Briefing. Briefing Topics Plan framework o NCDOT Policy to Projects process o Relationship to local/regional plans

Chapter 2. Alternatives

SR 432 RAIL REALIGNMENT AND HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT ELECTED AND AGENCY OFFICIALS PROJECT BRIEFING May 14, 2014

State of Ohio Rail Plan. MORPC Community Advisory Committee June 4, 2018 Meeting

12 Evaluation of Alternatives

SH 35 Public Meeting

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE June 7, ATK Contact: Media Relations

2010 Indiana Logistics Summit

Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study. Welcome to the scoping open house!

Introduction. Performance Measurement. Pg. 01

Minnesota Statewide Freight System Plan Action Agenda Development Lead Agency (MnDOT or

Benefit Cost Analysis Narrative

Public Open House and Stakeholder Meeting Summary

Rail Division 2012 Annual Summary

ITEM #11: PHASE 2B SUPPLEMENT HAMPTON ROADS PASSENGER RAIL STUDY: SCOPE OF WORK

Texas Transportation Forum The Fast Track: Passenger Rail In Texas. Federal Railroad Administration Karen Rae, Deputy Administrator

Pacific Northwest High Speed Rail Corridor Amtrak Cascades Passenger Service Update

NATIONAL CAPITAL REGION TRANSPORTATION PLANNING BOARD

West Seattle and Ballard Link Extensions. Stakeholder Advisory Group March 14, 2018

75 th Street Corridor Improvement Project Cook County, Illinois

Developing New Revenue Streams For Transit

Join the Conversation!

SCS Scenario Planning

Regional Transportation Studies Management Committee

Stakeholder Consultation Outcomes

NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. New Jersey Statewide Strategic Freight Rail Plan

FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT/RECORD OF DECISION AND SECTION 4(F) EVALUATION

TOWN OF HALTON HILLS TRUCKING STRATEGY STUDY

Northeast Rail Operations Study (NEROps)

Development of the I-70 Corridor of National Significance

Regional Connector Transit Corridor Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement/ Draft Environmental Impact Report

3. STATION SPACING AND SITING GUIDELINES

2004 FEASIBILITY STUDY UPDATE

Goal 1 Provide for a balanced and multimodal regional transportation system that meets existing and future needs.

Ann Arbor Station Environmental Review. Public Information Meetings April 2, 2014

Preapplication for HSIPR Program OMB No

CDTC NEW VISIONS FREIGHT & GOODS MOVEMENT

Intelligent Transportation Systems Master Plan

PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PASSENGER RAIL FREIGHT RAIL. Executive Summary.

DOT TIGER Grants and Rural America: Eligible Projects that Support Strong Economies and Livable Communities

Background. Purpose of This Phase of Project Development

D E C AT U R I N T E R M O D A L R A M P O P P O R T U N I T Y F I N A L R E P O R T A U G U S T 3 1,

3 Documentation of Alternatives

Chapter 1 Introduction

METRA UP-W LINE. Locally Preferred Alternative Report

FACT SHEETS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY

Transcription:

Appendix D Presentation Slides with Script 18 Grand Crossing Rail Project 10 S. Riverside Plaza, Suite 400 Chicago, IL 60606 www.grandcrossingrail.com info@grandcrossingrail.com

[title slide no narration] 1

Welcome to tonight s Community Meeting for the Grand Crossing Rail Project thank you for taking the time to join us. This meeting was requested by the community to provide the opportunity for individuals who were not able to participate in the December 2011 public meetings to review and provide input on the information and materials that were presented. Tonight s Community Meeting will present the same technical content as the December public meetings. This evening, we hope to learn about the community values and transportation issues that are important to you, as well as provide you with information about the Grand Crossing Rail Project and why it s needed. We would also like to hear your input on the project s Purpose and Need Statement, which is described later in this presentation. 2

Your feedback is vital to building a better transportation system for the community and region. The Grand Crossing Rail Project team is using the Context Sensitive Solutions process to develop an Environmental Impact Statement, or EIS, for the project. This process engages all project stakeholders, including neighborhood residents, elected officials, community and business leaders, interest groups, other government agencies, and anybody whointeracts with the railroads and roadways in the project study area. The intent is to identify and have a clear understanding of the community s transportation concerns. Your valuable input will help shape a solution for the Grand Crossing Rail Project tthat t best tbl balances the transportation t ti needs of this project with the concerns and values of your community. 3

CREATE stands for Chicago Region Environmental and Transportation Efficiency Program, a first of its kind partnership between the Federal Highway Administration, State of Illinois, City of Chicago, Metra, Amtrak, and the nation s freight railroads. A project of regional and national significance, CREATE consists of 70 separate yet interrelated projects, including roadway and rail overpasses and underpasses, improvements to existing viaducts and grade crossings, and upgrades to tracks, switches, and signal and dispatch systems. 4

For almost 150 years, Chicago has been the nation's rail hub due to its location at the center of the North American railroad network. Each day, nearly 1,300 freight and passenger trains pass through the region. Chicago handles one fourth of the nation's freight rail traffic, or 37,500 railcars each day, with this number expected to nearly double by 2020. Chicago also is Amtrak s primary intercity rail hub outside the Northeast Corridor, with nearly all of its long distance and intercity passenger rail services in the Midwest terminating at Union Station. In Illinois, Amtrak service operates almost entirely on freight owned track and has been increasingly affected by conflicts with freight operations resulting from growing rail traffic. Ridership is also growing on Metra commuter rail service, further worsening capacity and congestion issues on the region s rail network. 5

Because of the manner in which train tracks currently intersect with each other and with ihroads, and because tracks are shared dby freight and passenger trains, it can now take up to 30 hours for freight trains to pass through the Chicago region. Delays in rail freight, including at grade crossings, threaten the economic vitality of the region, lead to increased traffic congestion on roadways, generate unnecessary levels of air pollution, raise safety concerns, and adversely affect the reliability and speed of passenger rail service. The infrastructure improvements completed under the CREATE Program will increase efficiency of freight and passenger rail service throughout the region. 6

For Chicago residents, CREATE will mean reduced traffic delays, shorter commute times, better air quality and increased public safety. For workers and businesses region wide, it will mean more jobs and economic opportunity. 7

The Grand Crossing Rail Project is one component project of the overall CREATE Program. Every day, six Amtrak trains on the Illini, Saluki, and City of New Orleans lines pass through Chicago s south side, coming from Champaign, Carbondale, Memphis, and New Orleans. The route they currently travel is congested and does not provide direct access into Union Station, causing delays for rail passengers. The Grand Crossing Rail Project will examine alternate, less congested routes that would enable Amtrak trains to travel directly into Union Station, reducing delays for rail passengers and freight trains. 8

The study area is located on Chicago s South Side, between Pershing Road and 115 th Street. It includes neighborhoods along portions of the Canadian National Railway or CN and Norfolk Southern or NS rail lines, including the area where these two lines intersect near E. 75th Street at Grand Crossing. 9

Currently, Amtrak s Illini, Saluki, and City of New Orleans trains travel a roundabout and congested route through the South Side of Chicago. Because the existing rail infrastructure lacks a direct connection between the tracks that these trains use and those that lead into and out of Union Station, trains must make a time consuming backup move to pull into and out of Union Station. On their way, they also pass through a congested rail crossing at 16 th Street, which frequently makes these trains late and worsens congestion throughout the rail system. Together, these issues add 19 minutes to the schedule. 10

To remedy this situation, the Project Team will identify potential solutions to meet the transportation needs that are the focus of the Grand Crossing Rail Project. These may include identifying alternate routes for Amtrak s Illini, Saluki, and City of New Orleans trains, as well as infrastructure improvements to make these options feasible. In developing alternatives, the project team will take into account the many challenges of implementing transportation improvements in an urban area and complex rail environment with many users. For instance, there are limited options for approaching Union Station from the south, and these routes are currently used by other passenger and freight trains. Shifting Illini, Saluki, and City of New Orleans trains to another route will reduce available capacity along the new route, so any solution must also provide additional railroad improvements so the new route can handle both the existing and projected freight trains, as well as the Amtrak trains that would be rerouted onto it. 11

As part of this project, IDOT will prepare an Environmental Impact Statement, or EIS. Federal llaw requires that an EIS be prepared for federallyfunded projects that could potentially affect the quality of the human and natural environment. When it is complete, the EIS will identify the solution called the Preferred Alternative that will best address the transportation issues, and then detail how this solution was selected. 12

The EIS will state the purpose of the Grand Crossing Rail Project and will detail the needs that the proposed action will address. Then, the EIS will document the alternatives that were developed and evaluated to meet the project s purpose and need. It also will explain the potential impacts and benefits resulting from the project and identify ways to avoid or lessen the potential negative impacts. Finally, the EIS will describe how stakeholders were engaged in the decision making process and how the local community s concerns and values were factored into the proposed solution. 13

Public meetings and other outreach activities are an important part of the EIS process, which will take approximately two and a half years to complete. Two sets of public meetings have been held to date. These meetings which were held in December 2011 and March 2012 focused on the Purpose and Need Statement and the Range of Alternatives, respectively. Tonight s meeting was specifically requested by membersofthe community to provide local residents with an additional opportunity to review and comment on the Purpose and Need Statement. The technical information presented here tonight is identical to the information presented at the December 2011 meetings. Although the focus of tonight s meeting is the Purpose and Need Statement, the Project Team has developed da Range of Alternatives to address the identified ifi d transportation needs in the project corridor. The Range of Alternatives was presented at the March 2012 public meetings and is available on the project website for review at any time. Input received from tonight s meeting will be used by the Project Team to confirm the purpose p of and need for the project, as well as the alternatives or solutions to address these needs. The findings of this assessment will be used to develop the Draft EIS, which will be presented at public hearings in early 2013. This is the only round of public hearings scheduled for the project. 14

Two community advisory groups, consisting of local residents and representatives frombusinesses businesses, police and fire districts, non profit organizations, churches and schools, have been formed for this project. These Community Advisory Groups will be an important part of this project. As representatives of the community, these individuals provide another forum for the project team to learn about the interests and concerns of residents, business owners, and other community stakeholders as they relate to this project. Two sets of Community Advisory Group meetings have been held to assist in development of the Purpose and Need Statement and the Range of Alternatives. The Purpose and Need meeting held in November 2011 featured a briefing by the Project Team and a group survey exercise focused on identifying the community resources and transportation issues that are most important to the community. The Range of Alternatives meeting held in March 2012 shortly before the March public meetings also included a project briefing, which was followed by small group discussions where Community Advisory Group members and Project Team staff had the opportunity for detailed, back and forth conversation on the alternatives presented. The next Community Advisory Group meeting will be held this summer and will help the Project Team identify a Preferred Alternative for the project. 15

Other outreach activities will include meetings with Federal, state, and local agencies, elected officials, i and other stakeholders. khld The Project Team will also attend community group meetings, as invited, to discuss the project. Public hearings, tentatively scheduled for early 2013, will provide the opportunity for the public to review and comment on the Draft EIS and weigh in on the selection of the Preferred Alternative. 16

This Community Meeting along with the public meetings held to date represent an important step in the EIS process. We hope that you will take the time to provide us with your thoughts on the project and what transportation issues are most important to you. We welcome your questions and comments at any time and encourage you to provide input throughout the life of the project. Contact information including the project s website, bi mailing address, and phone number is provided on many of the handout materials you received tonight. The Project Team requests that any comments specific to the Purpose and Need Statement be submitted by June 1, 2012 to help us maintain the EIS schedule. 17

Thank you once again for participating p in tonight s Community Meeting for the Grand Crossing Rail Project. We hope to see you again. 18