KARST GEOLOGY, VAPOR INTRUSION, AND HUMAN HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT. Fundamental Issues to Consider

Similar documents
Groundwater Investigations for CCR Landfills in Karst Terrain

Stormwater Design for Karst Terrain

Brenna McDonald Missouri Department of Natural Resources Missouri Geological Survey

Site Closure Strategy for Contaminants in Fractured Crystalline Rock Air Force Plant 6, Marietta, GA

A Rational Approach to Vapor Intrusion Preferential Pathways

Conceptual Site Models for Environmental Investigations and Remediation

Soil Vapor Migration Through Subsurface Utilities

General Groundwater Concepts

STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES FOR MUNICIPAL WATERWORKS, WASTEWATER AND STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEMS

Assessing Technical Impracticability in a Karst Setting at Anniston Army Depot

PA Vapor Intrusion Guidance

Challenges of Monitoring Groundwater at CCR Sites in Karst Terrain

Groundwater. Importance of Groundwater. The Water Table. Geol 104: Groundwater

Conceptual Site Model Considerations - Terrestrial/Groundwater

STRATEGIES FOR CHARACTERIZING SUBSURFACE RELEASES OF GASOLINE CONTAINING MTBE

Movement and Storage of Groundwater The Hydrosphere

DEVELOPMENT OF AQUIFER TESTING PLANS. Brent Bauman, P.G. / Erin Lynam, Aquatic Biologist

Groundwater. Chapter 10 11/22/2011. I. Importance of groundwater

4. LNAPL Conceptual Site Model (LCSM)

Area B Groundwater Investigation Fort Detrick

U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Soil Vapor Extraction Subsurface Performance Checklist

The Department issues this draft decision pursuant to APC&EC Minute Order

Establishing Contact

AREA B GROUNDWATER INVESTIGATION

DEVELOPING A GOOD CONCEPTUAL MODEL FOR FEDERAL CONTAMINATED SITES COMMON SHORTFALLS AND DATA NEEDS. Presented by: Pierre Maheux, M.Sc., P.Geo.

Groundwater basics. Groundwater and surface water: a single resource. Pore Spaces. Simplified View

Groundwater. Groundwater Movement. Groundwater Movement Recharge: the infiltration of water into any subsurface formation.

Site Investigation of Ground Water

Aquifer Type. Karst. Rock. Aquifer Characteristics. Permeability Mostly 1 0 Mostly 2 0 Almost All 2 0 Flow Slow, laminar Possibly fast/turbulent

HYDROLOGIC FACTORS AFFECTING SINKHOLE DEVELOPMENT IN A WELL FIELD IN THE KARST DOUGHERTY PLAIN, SOUTHWEST OF ALBANY, GEORGIA

Groundwater and surface water: a single resource. Santa Cruz River, Tucson

Helena Valley Ground Water Monitoring Program

2. Assessing the potential risk to Groundwater

11 HYDROLOGY, HYDROGEOLOGY AND DRAINAGE

EES 1001 Lab 9 Groundwater

EKOS Oct 2010 COMBINING SOIL GAS SAMPLING AND MIP INVESTIGATION TO OPTIMIZE A DNAPL SOURCE ZONE CHARACTERIZATION

Supplemental Guide II-Delineations

Manure Management Guidelines for Limestone Bedrock/Karst Areas of Genesee County, New York: Practices for Risk Reduction

INDUCED ALKALINE RECHARGE ZONES TO MITIGATE ACTIVE ACIDIC SEEPS

February 23, 2010 Version 0.0

CHAPTER 13 OUTLINE The Hydrologic Cycle and Groundwater. Hydrologic cycle. Hydrologic cycle cont.

Closed Castner Firing Range Remedial Investigation. Technical Project Planning (TPP) Meeting #4 07 November :00 AM 11:00 AM

Protocols to Reduce Remediation Costs Using Ultra-High Resolution Site Characterization

Developing a Site Characterization Plan

Understanding Earth Fifth Edition

Risk Assessment Methodologies in Ranking Decontamination Actions on National and Local Level. a Hungarian Experience

Shelbyville, Kentucky Stormwater Best Management Practices (BMPs) Stormwater Pollution Treatment Practices (Structural) DRAFT

Reference Guideline #1. Hydrogeological Impact Assessment

LNAPL Recovery Using Vacuum Enhanced Technology. Theresa Ferguson, R.G. June 2014

Groundwater Earth 9th Edition Chapter 17 Mass wasting: summary in haiku form Importance of groundwater Importance of groundwater

Hydrogeology 101 3/7/2011

CHAPTER 4 - EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE OF DUBUQUE COUNTY, IOWA. Adopted March 29, 2010.

August Vapor Intrusion Guidance FAQs

Vapor Intrusion in Massachusetts Gerard Martin

Conceptual Site Models Don t Start a Project Without One

STRAWMAN OUTLINE March 21, 2008 ISWS/ISGS REPORT ON THE OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES OF MEETING WATER DEMAND IN NORTH-EAST ILLINOIS

Wells To ensure a continuous supply of water, a well must penetrate below the water table. Pumping of wells can cause:

Ground Water Monitoring Guidance for Nuclear Power Plants EPRI Report No

Operational Range Assessment Program (ORAP) Phase II Overview For Active Installations

Santa Susana Field Laboratory Simi Hills

ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT WATER DIVISION- INDUSTRIAL SECTION

EFFECTS OF WATERSHED TOPOGRAPHY, SOILS, LAND USE, AND CLIMATE ON BASEFLOW HYDROLOGY IN HUMID REGIONS: A REVIEW

Preferential Ground-Water Flow: Evidence from Decades of Fluorescent Dye-Tracing

MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES. Monitored Natural Attenuation of Groundwater Contamination at Voluntary Cleanup Program Sites

Groundwater in Alberta: What Don t We Know

THE EDWARDS AQUIFER: A GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE. Philip Rykwalder

Ground Water Chapter 11

Groundwater Level and Movement

Proposed MCP Amendments

Evolving Conceptual Models and Monitoring Well Reconstruction in the Passaic Formation in New Jersey Abstract

Innovative Remediation of Light Non Aqueous Phase Liquids (LNAPL): Development of a Conceptual Site Model Leading to a Sustainable Remedial Design

Science Olympiad. Mentor Invitational Hydrogeology ANSWER KEY. Name(s): School Name: Point Totals

CONTAMINATED LAND FUNDAMENTALS

Water Framework Directive. Groundwater Monitoring Programme. Site Information. Cregduff Spring

Experience Background

Introduction. Welcome to the Belgium Study Abroad Program. Courses:

ENVIRONMENTAL HYDROGEOLOGY

Using the Conceptual Site Model Approach to Characterize Groundwater Quality

Groundwater Risk Assessment

Understanding Hydrologic Process for Better Stormwater Management

Evaluation and Protection of the Tomstown Aquifer in Western Cumberland County, PA

Corps Base Camp Lejeune: Utilizing the DoD Phased Approach to Prioritize Building Investigations

MEMORANDUM. Kathy Yager USEPA OSRTI Dick Goehlert USEPA Region 1 Darryl Luce USEPA Region 1 Mindy Vanderford, GSI Environmental, Inc.

Navy s Portfolio Optimization: In Situ Remediation Sites Presented By Mike Singletary, P.E. Naval Facilities Engineering Command (NAVFAC) Southeast

TECHNICAL GUIDANCE FOR CONTAMINATED SITES GROUNDWATER INVESTIGATION AND CHARACTERIZATION

4.5 GEOTECHNICAL, SUBSURFACE, AND SEISMIC HAZARDS

Making Better Decisions: Real-Time Data Collection and Interpretation

Rockland County s Water Resources -Selected Findings from the USGS Study- Paul M. Heisig, Hydrologist New York USGS Water Science Center Troy, NY

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY OIL, GAS, AND MINERALS DIVISION OIL AND GAS OPERATIONS. Filed with the Secretary of State on

Water Cycle. Are you really drinking the same water as the caveman?

Purpose: Continued development of a conceptual model, incorporating the hydrogeologic information.

New Minnesota Landfill Siting Rules

Introduction to Groundwater

Groundwater Training Course SOPAC, April Island Groundwater Resources

8. Regional groundwater system

June 28, Test Well Flow Rate Report MSD Underground Injection Control Wells City of Richlawn Louisville, Kentucky 40207

Soil Vapor Extraction O&M Report Camp Stanley Storage Activity, Texas

Vadose Zone Profiling to Better Understand Processes

Groundwater Models and Modeling Considerations

Best management practices for vapor investigation and building mitigation decisions

Transcription:

KARST GEOLOGY, VAPOR INTRUSION, AND HUMAN HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT Fundamental Issues to Consider

Introduction 2 Development of property with karst features Standard geologic investigation methods to determine structural complexity of karst geology Risk Assessment on site with contamination in karst geology How do we differentiate the SOW when the property is contaminated with VOCs? How might we interpret the study results if contamination exists? How will the Conceptual Site Model (CSM) assist with process?

Karst Geology vs. Contamination 3 Typical Karst Assessment Structural Condition Groundwater Use Risk Assessment with Contamination in Karst Geology Structural Condition Groundwater Use Potential Chemical Vapor Migration Exposure/Human Health Risk Assessment

Outline 4 Human Health Risk Assessment Preliminary Conceptual Site Model Development of Scope of Work Elements of Karst for a Hydrogeologic Model Investigative Methods Evaluation of Karst Refining the Conceptual Site Model CSM Figure

Human Health Risk Assessment 5 What is a Human Health Risk Assessment? It s a tool used to estimate whether exposure to chemicals in the environment (e.g. soil, groundwater, air) will cause adverse health effects

Basic Components of a RA 6 Site Characterization (data collection) Measure the chemical concentration in source media Exposure assessment (conceptual site model) Evaluate potential fate and transport, receptors and exposure pathways Toxicity assessment Assess the health effects the chemicals may have on a receptor (carcinogenic and noncarcinogenic effects) Risk characterization Combines the amount of chemical intake with the toxicity assessment to establish a numeric risk estimate

7 Basic Components of a RA

Basic Components of CSM 8 There are several components to a conceptual site model (CSM): Hydrogeologic Model Human Health Model

Conceptual Site Model 9 Different forms Picture Flowchart Table

Preliminary CSM 10 Start by gathering information: Regional geology Future development plans Historic use of property Well survey (local water usage) Helps to define Geologic/Hydro SOW

Development of Scope of Work 11 Develop characterization SOW to define vertical and horizontal extent of contamination Extent of pinnacles and voids (solution cavities) Bedrock topography GW in fractures vs. unconsolidated or both Extent of unconsolidated zone and type of material Level of fracturing DNAPL/LNAPL Groundwater flow

Important Elements of Karst for Hydrogeologic CSM Development 12 Variable Depth to Bedrock Sinkholes and Closed Depressions Fractures and Voids Disappearing Streams Complex Groundwater Flow

Variable Depth to Bedrock 13 Soil cover ranges from thick to absent Exposed rock at surface Contact of rock with buildings/foundations SIGNIFICANCE: Direct entry of contaminants to fractured bedrock and/or groundwater through exposed fractures No attenuation capacity for soil gas emanating from groundwater or from subsurface impacts

Variable Depth to Bedrock 14 Heating oil on top of weathered limestone bedrock at 2 ft-bgs

Sinkholes and Closed Depressions 15 Significance of Closed Depressions Zones of groundwater recharge Future sinkhole development Flooding Sinkholes Direct pathway to groundwater system Instability Flooding Seasonal flooding may be result of backing-up of conduit system Transport mechanism delivering contamination to surface

Sinkholes and Closed Depressions 16 Sinkhole development in stormwater retention basin

Fractures and Voids 17 Solution enhanced conduits for contaminant accumulation and migration Conduit network is generally unpredictable and complex Provides significant pockets for accumulation of residuallycontaminated sediments and water Seasonal activity Seasonal or episodic activity sediments or contaminated subsurface pool may only be in contact with rest of karst system when flooded during heavy precipitation events Timing of monitoring is critical can miss initial flush of impacts from system Provides additional element of variability to analytical data

Fractures and Voids 18 Groundwater discharge from conduit flow

Disappearing Streams 19 Unpredictable Surface Water Intermittent occurrence of streams due to majority of water transport occurring below ground Seasonality of quantity and quality Surface water may be present during wetter periods of year when conduit network is full or near capacity Surface water quality is variable due to flushing from conduit network

Disappearing Streams 20 Losing stream in a limestone valley, central PA

Disappearing Streams 21 Swallow-hole within losing stream bed, central PA

Groundwater 22 Complex Groundwater Flow Direction of decreasing potentiometric head versus actual groundwater flow path Conduits/voids provide seasonal contaminant loading to groundwater Groundwater occurrence overburden, bedrock or both? Multiple flow regimes possible Groundwater follows different conduits based on overall stage of groundwater system Diffuse versus conduit flow Diffuse flow saturated groundwater flow through the rock matrix Conduit flow flow within the fractures, solution-enhanced conduits Which is representative of groundwater system?

Groundwater and Surface Water 23 Heating oil seep along bedrock in drainage ditch

Groundwater 24 Groundwater flow pre- and post-hurricane Ivan, Sept. 2004 August 31, 2004 September 30, 2004

Investigative Methods 25 The complexities with karst require multiple investigative techniques to minimize unknowns Geophysics electrical resistivity, GPR, etc. Soil Borings Confirmation of geophysical results depth to bedrock Assessment of soil impacts Monitoring Wells assess groundwater flow and impacts Tracer Testing identify groundwater flow and discharges that your monitoring network has missed

Investigative Methods 26 Use of geophysics to map bedrock and sinkholes Terrain Conductivity Investigation

Investigative Methods 27 Tracer testing of Karst System

Evaluation of Karst Data 28 Evaluation of karst data relative to development of Hydrogeologic Conceptual Site Model How does karst setting effect contaminant migration pathways? How does karst setting effect potential exposure pathways?

Karst and Contaminant Migration 29 Contaminant migration Vapor migration from shallow bedrock Soils as source Fractures/conduits as source Sediments within fractures/conduits as source Standing pools within conduits as source Surface water Identify how the impacts migrate to surface water Identify where impacts discharge to surface water Groundwater Potential for significant off-site migration given conduit network Groundwater to surface water discharge Inferred groundwater flow direction versus actual flow direction and path Bedrock groundwater to overburden and overburden groundwater contaminant transport Periodic back-up of conduit system can transport contaminants to overburden

Karst and Exposure Pathways 30 Identify potential exposure pathways relating to the occurrence and migration of contamination Soils capability to provide attenuation for soil gas Soil thickness Soil type Separation from groundwater

Karst and Exposure Pathways 31 Groundwater Potential for significant off-site migration given conduit network = potentially large number of receptors Seasonality Diffuse versus conduit flow Inferred groundwater flow direction versus actual flow direction and path Frequency of conduit backup Flooding of overburden with bedrock groundwater thereby decreasing the maximum depth of exposure to contaminated groundwater Significant conduit flooding resulting in formation of surface water containing contaminated bedrock groundwater

Refining the CSM 32 So far Vertical/horizontal extent accomplished by monitoring well and soil boring placement Fate and Transport of constituents Use geologic/hydro model to determine receptors/exposure pathways Now we can refine the CSM

Refining the CSM: Things to Consider 33 Volatiles within solution cavities? Preferential pathway Do bedrock pinnacles reach near the surface? Do fractures lead to building? How much attenuation? How far do karst fractures extend? Does contamination on-site migrate through karst fractures to off-site buildings or potable water source?

34 CSM Figure

Contacts 35 The Mahfood Group LLC 1061 Waterdam Plaza Drive Suite 201 McMurray, PA 15317 (724) 260-5219 DMS Environmental Services LLC 103 South Spring Street Bellefonte, PA 16823 (814) 353-3356