Andrea Nifong, World Water Works (formerly HRSD) Stephanie Klaus, VT & HRSD

Similar documents
THE DEMON ANAMMOX PROCESS: RESOURCE SAVINGS THROUGH SIDE STREAM TREATMENT, AND THE STEPS TOWARDS AN ENERGY NEUTRAL WWTP PRESENTED AT: NC AWWA-WEA 97

Shortcut Biological Nitrogen Removal for sustainable wastewater treatment and achieving energy neutrality

Advances in Point Source Nitrogen Removal Technologies: Transitioning from Version 1.0 to 3.0

Deammonification for Cost-Effective Sidestream Treatment

Sidestream Treatment Overview. Kam Law, P.E. Beverley Stinson, Ph.D.

Presentation Outline

Tales from the Field: Troubleshooting Denitrification

Mainstream ANITA Mox Pilot Testing at Los Angeles County Joint Water Pollution Control Plant. Meg Hollowed Veolia Water Technologies

We Know Water. AnoxKaldnes. Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor (MBBR) Integrated Fixed-Film Activated Sludge (IFAS) and ANITA Mox Deammonification

ANITA Mox MBBR. Simon Piveteau, M. Christensson, B. Bigot, R. Lemaire, L. Rohold, B. Nussbaum, J. Ochoa

WWTP Side Stream Treatment of Nutrients Considerations for City of Raleigh s Bioenergy Recovery Project. Erika L. Bailey, PE, City of Raleigh

AnoxKaldnes. Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor (MBBR) and Integrated Fixed-Film Activated Sludge (IFAS)

At the Mercy of the Process Impacts of Nitrogen Removal Performance on WWTP Disinfection

We Know Water. AnoxKaldnes. Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor (MBBR) Integrated Fixed-Film Activated Sludge (IFAS) and ANITA Mox Deammonification

Developments in Mainstream Deammonification and Nitrite Shunt Haydée De Clippeleir

Developments in Mainstream Deammonification and Nitrite Shunt Haydée De Clippeleir

Sustainable Approaches to Sidestream Nutrient Removal and Recovery

A Battle to Be the Best: A Comparison of Two Powerful Sidestream Treatment Technologies: Post Aerobic Digestion and Anammox

NITROGEN REMOVAL GRANT WEAVER, PE & WWTP OPERATOR PRESIDENT THE WATER PLANET COMPANY. Create Optimal Habitats

Side Stream Nutrient Considera6ons and Nutrient Harves6ng

ONE-STAGE DEAMMONIFICATION PROCESS - MBBR VERSUS IFAS CONFIGURATIONS - DEVELOPMENT UPDATES AND APPLICATION CONSIDERATIONS

MAINSTREAM DEAMMONIFICATION

Short-Cut Nitrogen Removal: A State of the Art Review

2015 Spring Conference

Managing the Risk of Embracing Disruptive Technology

Experience from start-up and operation of ANITA Mox plants and development of a new Hybas ANITA Mox process

Post-Aerobic Digester with Bioaugmentation Pilot Study City of Meridian, ID WWTP PNCWA 2010

AMPC Wastewater Management Fact Sheet Series Page 1

AMPC Wastewater Management Fact Sheet Series Page 1

MBBR Technology: - A cost effective solution for upgrading existing Waste water Treatment Works. Bruno Bigot

Wastewater Process Ephemeralization -

Bhargavi Golluru. Chapel Hill 2016 Approved by: Michael D. Aitken Glenn W. Walters Stephen C. Whalen

Secondary Treatment Process Control

The following biological nutrient removal processes were evaluated in detail in the 2016 Liquid Processing Facilities Plan:

COMPARISON OF SBR AND CONTINUOUS FLOW ACTIVATED SLUDGE FOR NUTRIENT REMOVAL

Altoona Westerly Wastewater Treatment Facility BNR Conversion with Wet Weather Accommodation

AquaPASS. Aqua MixAir System. Phase Separator. System Features and Advantages. Anaerobic. Staged Aeration. Pre-Anoxic.

Planning for the Future Battle Creek s Approach to Upgrading its Secondary Treatment Processes

Efficient Design Configurations for Biological Nutrient Removal

General Operational Considerations in Nutrient and Wet Weather Flow Management for Wastewater Treatment Facilities Part II

UPGRADING FOR TOTAL NITROGEN REMOVAL WITH A POROUS MEDIA IFAS SYSTEM

Energy Savings Through Denitrification

Upgrading Lagoons to Remove Ammonia, Nitrogen, and Phosphorus *nutrient removal in cold-climate lagoon systems

ONSITE TREATMENT. Amphidrome

A Novel Testing Approach for BNR Optimization in NYC. Vera Gouchev, P.E. January 23, 2017 NEWEA 2017 Annual Conference

A Shortcut Nitrogen Removal Process for a Wisconsin WWTP

Feel free to contact me should you require any additional information regarding the report. I can be reached at

AMMONIACAL NITROGEN REMOVAL FROM SLUDGE LIQUORS OPERATIONAL EXPERIENCE WITH THE DEMON PROCESS

Design, Construction and Startup of the First Enhanced Nutrient Removal Plant in Maryland Funded by the Chesapeake Bay Restoration Fund

An Innovative Approach to Retrofitting for Nitrogen Removal

Upgrade of the Marathon Louisiana Refining Division s Wastewater Treatment Plant to a State-of-the-Art Nitrification-Denitrification Facility

Global Leaders in Biological Wastewater Treatment

Technologies for Sustainable Wastewater Treatment. Nitrogen Removal from Sludge Dewatering Liquor

Enhancing activated sludge nitrification through seeding from a downstream nitrifying fixed-film reactor

Enhanced Nitrogen Removal Using Upflow Biological Filtration

Wastewater Nitrogen Characteristics, Treatment and Removal Options. Bob Smith, Orenco Systems, Inc. GEC 2013

Filtrate Treatment Facility Update

Contents General Information Abbreviations and Acronyms Chapter 1 Wastewater Treatment and the Development of Activated Sludge

DESIGNING LAGOON-BASED WWTP FOR <1 MG/ L AMMONIA (AND TN) IN <34 F WATER. Nick Janous Regional Manager

Innovations in Nitrogen and Phosphorus Removal

NUTRIENT REMOVAL PROCESSES IN WASTEWATER TREATMENT. We re Glad You re Here!

Nutrient Removal Processes MARK GEHRING TECHNICAL SALES MGR., BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT

Nutrient Removal Optimization at the Fairview WWTP

BioWin 3. New Developments in BioWin. Created by process engineers.. for process engineers

SIMPLE and FLEXIBLE ENERGY SAVINGS And PERFORMANCE ENHANCEMENT for OXIDATION DITCH UPGRADES

Ditches for Energy Efficiency and Improved Nitrogen Removal

NUTRIENT REMOVAL FROM ANAEROBIC DIGESTER SIDE-STREAM AT THE BLUE PLAINS AWTP Overlook Ave., SW, Washington, DC 20032

Integrated real-time SRT and aeration control in the city of Grand Rapids

New Developments in BioWin 5.3

Nitrogen Removal in Large Scale Plants. Dimitri Katehis PhD, PE

RE ENGINEERING O&M PRACTICES TO GET NITROGEN & PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL WITHOUT FACILITY UPGRADES

Making Your Plant Denitrify

We Know Water. AnoxKaldnes. Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor (MBBR) Integrated Fixed-Film Activated Sludge (IFAS) and ANITA Mox Deammonification

Operation and Control of Multiple BNR Processes in One WWTP

ENVE 302 Environmental Engineering Unit Processes DENITRIFICATION

PLANNING FOR NUTRIENT REMOVAL: WHAT STEPS CAN WE BE TAKING NOW?

Soggy in Snohomish - Biofilm Media Improves Wet-Weather Lagoon Nitrification

OCTOBER 31, NAMI Environmental Conference BEST PRACTICES: IMPROVING WW SYSTEMS

Stonecrest Estates Sewage Treatment Plant 2017 Annual Report

Pilot Testing a High-Speed Turbo Blower at the City of Plano, Illinois Water Reclamation Facility"

The ANITA Range Sustainable and cost-effective solutions for high-ammonia loaded effluents

In 2010, municipal wastewater treatment facilities

RE: Annual Report 2016 Wardsville Wastewater Treatment Plant and Collection System

Sensors for Activated Sludge Aeration Control

OWEA Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition Upgrading WRFs for Biological Nutrient Removal. June 25, 2015

Sludge liquid treatment with Combined Nitritation / Anammox

ISAM SBR with Blower Assisted Jet Aeration Design Calculations For Lyons, CO WWTP Upgrade

Increasing Denitrification in Sequencing Batch Reactors with Continuous Influent Feed

SBR PROCESS FOR WASTEWATER TREATMENT

EHS SMART-Treat Onsite Moving Media Treatment System

Aqua MSBR MODIFIED SEQUENCING BATCH REACTOR

ADAMSTOWN BOROUGH SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT LANCASTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

Performance Evaluation of the Moores Creek Advanced Water Resource Recovery Facility

Waste water treatment

Nitrogen Removal Using Saturated Upflow Woody Fiber Media

Activated Sludge Process Control: Nitrification

1/22/2013. Low Energy Process Control

PILOT-SCALE DEMONSTRATION OF ANITA MOX PROCESS FOR SIDESTREAM DEAMMONIFICATION

Biological Phosphorus Removal Technology. Presented by: Eugene Laschinger, P.E.

CE421/521 Environmental Biotechnology. Nitrogen and Phosphorus Cycles Lecture Tim Ellis

Transcription:

Recommendations and Lessons Learned from the Startup of the First Two Full-Scale Sidestream Deammonification Processes in North America: DEMON and ANITA Mox Andrea Nifong, World Water Works (formerly HRSD) Stephanie Klaus, VT & HRSD

Key Points Training is key but only 2 champions need in depth training Control strategy for long term operation is stable and hands off AOB are the most sensitive bacteria in the process, AOB are limiting not anammox 25 C is a reasonable minimum temperature Long term shutdowns are possible 2

Sidestream Deammonification ~1% of Total Plant Influent Flow ~20-40% of the Total Plant TN load NH 4 Concentration between 900 1,500 mg/l Alkalinity/NH4 ratio 3.5-4.0 Temperature 30-38 C Alkalinity insufficient for complete nitrification Insufficient carbon for denitrification Influent Primary Clarifier Aerobic Secondary Clarifier Tertiary Deammonification Anaerobic Digestor Dewatering Centrate 3

Conventional Nitrification-Denitrification Autotrophic Bacteria Aerobic Environment 25% O 2 (energy) Nitratation 1 mol Nitrate (NO 3- ) 40% Carbon (BOD) Denitratation Heterotrophic Bacteria Anoxic Environment 1 mol Nitrite (NO 2- ) 1 mol Nitrite (NO 2- ) 60% Carbon (BOD) Nitritation Denitritation 75% O 2 (energy) ~100% Alkalinity 1 mol Ammonia (NH 3 / NH 4 + ) NITRIFICATION ½ mol Nitrogen Gas (N 2 ) DENITRIFICATION 4

Partial Nitritation + Anammox = Deammonification NH 4+ + 1.32 NO 2- + 0.066 HCO 3- + 0.13 H + 0.26 NO 3- + 1.02N 2 + 0.066 CH 2 O 0.5 N 0.15 + 2.03 H 2 O Autotrophic Bacteria Aerobic Environment 0.5 mol Nitrite (NO 2- ) Advantages: 63% reduction in oxygen demand (energy) Nearly 100% reduction in carbon demand 80% reduction in biomass production No additional alkalinity required 37% O 2 (energy) ~57% Alkalinity 1 mol Ammonia (NH 3 / NH 4 + ) Autotrophic Anoxic Environment ½ mol Nitrogen Gas (N 2 ) + 0.11 mol Nitrate (NO3 - ) 5

One-Step Sidestream Deammonification (with full-scale applications) Upflow Granular Sludge Paques ANAMMOX SBR DEMON MBBR ANITA Mox Deammon 6

Operation Objectives Target is 90% NH 4 Removal (80% TIN Removal) Target is 10-15% NO 3 Production Typical Guidelines: o Residual alkalinity 150-250 mg/l as CaCO 3 o Residual NH 4 of 50-100 mg/l o Nitrite concentration below 20-40 mg/l 7

ANAEROBIC DEWATERING DIGESTION THICKENING DEMON AERATION BASINS HEADWORKS DENITE FILTERS DEMON at York River

Demon York River WWTP 9

DEMON Process Components Seed Sludge Aeration System Instruments & Controls Tank Blowers Decanter Mixer Cyclone 10

DEMON Control Strategy SBR configuration typically 6 or 8 hour cycle time Last hour of cycle - settle and decant During React Period multiple mini-cycles (10-30 mins): Aerate Mix/fill Mix Aeration: DO ~0.2-0.5 mg/l (PID control or constant airflow) ph based aeration control 11

DEMON Control Strategy - Anammox Enrichment AOB/NOB/OHO/debris Continual enrichment of anammox Large excess of activity Provides stability Ability to Washout NOB if proliferation occurs Anammox returned to Process 12

Confidential; Copyright 2013, World Water Works, Inc. All rights reserved. Seed Sludge 13 13

% NH4-N Removal ; % NO3-N Production NO2-N Concentration (mg/l); Temperature ( C) NH 4 and TIN Removal Percentages 100% NH4-N Removal NO3-N Production 100 90% NO2-N Cencentration Temperature 90 80% 80 70% 60% removal efficiency loss due to low temperatures 70 60 50% 50 40% 40 30% 30 20% 20 10% 10 0% 8-Oct-12 28-Oct-12 17-Nov-12 7-Dec-12 27-Dec-12 16-Jan-13 5-Feb-13 25-Feb-13 0 14

NH4-N kgn/m3/day) NH4 Loading and Removal Rates 0.50 0.45 0.40 NH4-N Influent Load (kgn/m3/day) NH4-N Load Removed (kgn/m3/day) 0.35 0.30 0.25 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 System Shut- down 0.00 15

HRSD James River Treatment Plant 16

ANITA Mox Process Components Aeration System Instrumentation Centrate Feed Mixers and Heaters K5 Media Media Retention 17

Supplemental Heating DEMON Temp maintained above 25 C after supplemental heating was supplied Lesson Learned: Insulate or provide heating during startup ANITA Mox Temp maintained above 30 C during startup and 25 C long term 18

Anitamox Process Control Centrate Feed Control Aeration Control Continuous and Intermittent Three Different Modes 1. Airflow setpoint (scfm) 2. Fixed DO setpoint 3. ph-based DO or airflow Mixer Control 19

Seeding and Startup 20

Biofilm Growth New media 12/12/13 New media 2/26/14 New media 4/10/14 New media 7/15/14 Seed media 12/12/13 Seed media 2/26/14 Seed media 4/10/14 Seed media 7/15/14 21

%, mg/l, C 100.0 NH 4 and TIN Removal Percentages 90.0 80.0 70.0 60.0 50.0 40.0 Startup Complete TIN Removal % NH4 Removal % NO2 out (mg/l) Temperature NO3 Production Ratio 30.0 20.0 10.0 0.0 12/3/13 1/2/14 2/1/14 3/3/14 4/2/14 5/2/14 6/1/14 7/1/14 22

kg/m3/day 1.0 0.9 NH4 Loading and Removal Rates Intermittent Aeration Continuous Aeration 0.8 0.7 0.6 NH4 Load (kg/m3/day) NH4 Removed (kg/m3/day) 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 Startup Complete 0.1 0.0 12/3/13 1/2/14 2/1/14 3/3/14 4/2/14 5/2/14 6/1/14 7/1/14 23

ph-based Aeration Control 24

DEMON ph-based Aeration Control Aeration time is based on a low ph setpoint Anoxic/Feed time based on a timer or high ph setpoint 25

Option 1: ANITA Mox Fixed DO or Airflow Setpoint DO (mg/l), Centrate Flow (m 3 /hr) 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 7.0 6.9 6.8 6.7 6.6 6.5 6.4 ph ph DO Centrate Flow DO setpoint Time (min) 26

Option 2: ANITA Mox ph-based Aeration Control DO (mg/l), Centrate Flow (m 3 /hr), ph 20 15 10 5 0 0 420 430 440 450 460 470 480 Day 100 80 60 40 20 NO3 Production %, NH4 Removal % ph Feedback Centrate Flow ph Setpoint DO Setpoint NO3 Production % NH4 Removal % 27

DEMON and ANITA Mox Both use a form ph-based Aeration Control Control modes: DEMON ph affects aeration time at controlled DO ANITA Mox ph affects DO concentration ph Probe minimal maintenance/calibration Use handheld/lab probe to verify Consistent ammonia load & removal = constant OUR 1 or 2 Lead Operators trained on ph Based aeration control 28

Alarms and Fail Safes Low ph = air shut off High DO = air and centrate feed shut off Low Level = air and centrate feed shut off Centrate Feed Pump Low Flow/Fail = air shut off High Level = centrate feed shutoff High/Low Temperature = alarm Cyclone Pump Low Pressure= shut off Manual Mode Alarm = alarm 29

Training Entire plant staff trained on basic understanding of process theory, process components, analysis requirements and controls Daily meetings during startup, tapering to weekly meeting. Participants included: Plant staff, R&D team, and vendor. 1-2 of the plant staff understand in depth theory, troubleshooting, and process control 30

Sampling/Analysis Sampling Frequency: Daily during startup tapering down to weekly Parameters: -On site: HACH test kit NH 3, NO 2, NO 3 -Lab data: Alk, scod, TSS, OP Training: 2 Lab Technicians Convenient Sample Ports 31

Sensor Management Instrument Calibration Frequency Maintenance ph Quarterly Max Weekly Cleaning DO Annual Weekly Cleaning/Air Blast Function Control Control Conductivity Annual No issue Monitoring Ammonia/Nitrate As needed compared to lab values Air Blast Monitoring 32

Specific Conductivity Specific conductivity represents the measure of all relevant ions For deammonification the most important are NH 4+, NO 2-, NO 3-, HCO 3 - Great monitoring tool 33

Specific Conductivity- ANITA Mox 7.2 240 ph 7.0 6.8 6.6 6.4 6.2 6.0 5.8 5.6 5.4 420 430 440 450 460 470 220 200 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 Specific Conductivity, NH4 ph NH4 Specific Conductivity Day 34

Centrate Quality Automate centrate diversion valves Eliminate sources of dilution water Sufficient EQ size and settling Temperature control if necessary 35

Micronutrient Addition Source: Grady, C., Daigger, G., Love, N., Filipe, C. (2011). Biological Wastewater Treatment, IWA Publishing. 36

% NH4-N Removal ; % NO3-N Production NO2-N Concentration (mg/l); Temperature ( C) Micronutrient Deficiency - DEMON 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% Micronutrient Addition 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0% 26-Jan-13 15-Feb-13 7-Mar-13 27-Mar-13 16-Apr-13 6-May-13 26-May-13 15-Jun-13 5-Jul-13 NH4-N Removal NO3-N Production NO2-N Cencentration Temperature 0 37

Percent % ph ANITA Mox Micronutrient Deficiency 100 NH4 Removal % 90 NO3 Production Ratio ph 80 70 60 50 40 14 12 10 8 6 30 20 10 12% NO3 Production Resume Micronutrient Addition 4 2 0 9/26/2014 10/26/2014 11/25/2014 12/25/2014 1/24/2015 0 38

Shutdowns Shutdown for a week at a time with no significant change in operation strategy > 1 week requires a reduced load during startup AOB are the limiting factor Anammox are very robust (very slow decay rate) DEMON and ANITA Mox appear similar One month shutdown for DEMON = one month restart 39

ANITA Mox Shutdown Test James River Main Plant Performance with and without ANITA Mox FIN EFF FIN EFF FIN EFF TKN NOx T-N 4/5/2015 2.42 2.33 4.75 4/6/2015 3.72 2.8 6.52 4/7/2015 3.63 3.28 6.91 4/8/2015 2.87 3.3 6.17 4/9/2015 4/10/2015 4/11/2015 4/12/2015 4.36 3.13 7.49 4/13/2015 5.95 3.07 9.02 4/14/2015 5.82 3.5 9.32 4/15/2015 5.99 3.92 9.91 With sidestream treatment Without sidestream treatment 40

Conclusions Complete ownership of the system starts with daily, then weekly performance discussions with two champions of the system Anammox are robust, all limiting issues have been caused by AOB ph control is simple and effective Sidestream deammonification is a proven technology Process is not plug & play, careful attention required during startup Thoughtful attention during normal operation; set point changes ~1-2X/week (assuming good EQ) Lessons learned from DEMON applied to ANITA Mox 41