South Florida Coastal Water Quality Monitoring Network - 1-3/05 Quarterly Report (C-15397)

Similar documents
15 April Re: South Florida Coastal Water Quality Monitoring Network Oct. Dec Quarterly Report for SFWMD Contract #

AN INTEGRATED SURFACE WATER QUALITY MONITORING PROGRAM FOR THE SOUTH FLORIDA COASTAL WATERS

South Florida Coastal Water Quality Monitoring Network FY2003 Cumulative Report to the South Florida Water Management District (Contract No.

SOUTH FLORIDA COASTAL WATER QUALITY MONITORING NETWORK

FIU Digital Commons. Florida International University. Ronald Jones Southeast Environmental Research Center, Florida International University

FY2004 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF THE WATER QUALITY MONITORING PROJECT

AN INTEGRATED SURFACE WATER QUALITY MONITORING PROGRAM FOR SOUTH FLORIDA COASTAL WATERS

What We Know About the Water Quality of the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary

7 October Re: Little Venice Water Quality Monitoring Quarterly Reports #6

2006 Annual Report of the Water Quality Monitoring Project for the Water Quality Protection Program of the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary

Using Hydrologic Monitoring as a Tool for Synthesis of the Greater Everglades and Southern Estuaries Modules of the Monitoring and Assessment Plan

FY2003 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE WATER QUALITY MONITORING PROJECT

FY2002 Annual Report of the Water Quality Monitoring Project for the Water Quality Protection Program in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary

Water Quality Monitoring Project for the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary

Spatial patterning of water quality in Biscayne Bay, Florida as a function of land use and water management

2015 Annual Report of the Water Quality Monitoring Project for the Water Quality Protection Program of the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary

Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. Water Quality Monitoring Project

Compound Interest: The Value of Long-Term Water Quality Monitoring in the FKNMS

3. Descriptive Statistics and Trends

Water Quality Protection Program Technical Advisory Committee Meeting 14 July

2014 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE WATER QUALITY MONITORING PROJECT FOR THE WATER QUALITY PROTECTION PROGRAM OF THE FLORIDA KEYS NATIONAL MARINE SANCTUARY

Water Quality. Report for State of the Bay Casco Bay Water Quality Report for State of the Bay 2010 Friends of Casco Bay, 2009

Southern Coastal Systems

Captiva Water Quality Assessment Project Update Supported by TDC s Beach & Shoreline Program through the Captiva Community Panel

CITY OF BONITA SPRINGS OCTOBER SEPTEMBER 2017 SURFACE WATER QUALITY MONITORING REPORT

City of Delray Beach MS4 Assessment Program: Part V. Monitoring Requirements MS4 Permit No. FLS

Biscayne Bay. Southwest. Florida. Coast. Florida. Bay 3.2 SOUTHERN ESTUARIES MODULE Introduction

MS4 Assessment Program to Satisfy Part V. Monitoring Requirements

Four major objectives constitute the framework for the study and include:

Potential Impacts of Climate Change and Sea Level Rise on South Florida s Coastal Wetlands

Water Quality Monitoring Program for Islamorada, Village of Islands, Florida Keys- Preliminary Report #1: Canal Water Characterization and Monitoring

Little Bay Water Quality Report Card Spring 2014

2016 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE WATER QUALITY MONITORING PROJECT FOR THE WATER QUALITY PROTECTION PROGRAM OF THE FLORIDA KEYS NATIONAL MARINE SANCTUARY

Annual Report on Clam Bay Numeric Nutrient Concentration (NNC) Criteria

SEA LEVEL RISE AND CLIMATE CHANGE AT THE COASTAL BOUNDARY: OBSERVATIONS, PROJECTIONS, AND ISSUES OF CONCERN FOR RESOURCE MANAGEMENT

Ecosystem Restoration and Management in Biscayne National Park

WATER QUALITY MONITORING IN THE LOXAHATCHEE ESTUARY

Coastal studies in Long Term Ecological Research. Dan Reed Santa Barbara Coastal LTER

Florida Coastal Everglades Long Term Ecological Research. Field Guide to Research Sites

Spatial Distribution of the Winter Nutrient Pool

Little Venice Water Quality Monitoring Project: EPA Assistance Agreement X and FDEP contract SP674 & SP678

Update on Numeric Nutrient Criteria Development

LOXAHATCHEE RIVER WATER QUALITY EVENT SAMPLING TASK 2: FINAL REPORT ASSESSMENT OF LOXAHATCHEE RIVER WATER QUALITY

William J. Mitsch, Ph.D.

Nitrogen and Phosphorus trends of three rivers along the southwest coast of Everglades National Park ( )

Inflow, water quality, and flushing of Lake Worth Lagoon

Sea-Level Rise Rates, Projections, & Effects in Southern Florida: Connecting Science to Natural and Urban Resource Management

Appendix B. Box Plots of Water Quality Data

MONITORING OF KEY EUTROPHICATION PARAMETERS AT THREE INSHORE STATIONS OF STRYMONIKOS GULF, NORTH AEGEAN SEA

The Importance of Organic Phosphorus in Promoting Cyanobacterial Blooms in Florida Bay: Competition Between Bacteria and Phytoplankton

St. Lucie Estuary: Analysis of Annual Cycles and Integrated Water Column Productivity

Water Contamination Mapping Lab

Nutrients, Algal Blooms and Red Tides in Hong Kong Waters. Paul J. Harrison and Jie XU

San Carlos Bay Water Quality Monitoring Status and Trends Report

Numeric Nutrient Criteria (NNC) Regulations

Christian L. Avila, Galia Varona, Maurice Pierre, Omar Abdelrahman, and Jamie Monty Miami-Dade County Department of Regulatory and Economic Resources

3) Minutes of the July 8, 2013 meeting. 4) Agenda Additions, Deletions or Corrections. 5) The 2013 CHNEP Shoreline Survey Update - Lisa Beever

3.1 GREATER EVERGLADES WETLANDS MODULE Introduction

Lesson Overview 4.5 Aquatic Ecosystems

Example scenario: NH, Great Bay NERR Station: Great Bay water quality April 28-June 10, Question: What happened?

Lake Elsinore and San Jacinto Watersheds Authority. Canyon Lake Phase 2 Water Quality Monitoring Plan

Session 2 Biodiversity Conservation

MIAMI RIVER BASIN WATER QUALITY IMPROVEMENT REPORT Action Item Matrix Quarterly Progress Report. Third Quarterly Report, 2002 (July 1 September 30)

Greater Everglades Coastal Salinity Gradients

Numeric Nutrient Criteria Update

WALTON COUNTY COASTAL DUNE LAKES WATER CHEMISTRY SUMMARY 2016

Progress on South Florida Estuaries Restoration: C-111 Western Spreader Canal and Biscayne Bay Coastal Wetland CERP Project

Little Bay Project Summary

EPA s Proposed Water Quality Standards for Florida s Lakes and Flowing Waters Establishing Numeric Nutrient Criteria January 14, 2010

Local Solutions to Our Water Quality Crisis

Boston Harbor Water Quality Update Massachusetts Water Resources Authority Environmental Quality Department Report

Special Publication SJ2004-SP22 St. Johns River Water Supply Project Surface Water Treatment and Demineralization Study

Surface Water and Seawater Interactions in the Coastal Environment of Biscayne Bay, Southeast Florida

Investigating the Causes and Mitigation of Harm Algal Blooms, Including Red Tide, in South Flor William J. Mitsch, Ph.D.

Nutrient Response to Sewage Abatement in Hong Kong

MONTHLY MARKET REPORT FOR MAY 2018

Chemical and Physical Analysis of the Cape Fear Estuary

Bring Your Highest Expectations MONTHLY MARKET REPORT FOR MARCH Naples / Bonita Springs / Estero / Marco Island Market Area

Initial Application of a Landscape Evolution Model to a Louisiana Wetland

Bring Your Highest Expectations MONTHLY MARKET REPORT FOR APRIL Naples / Bonita Springs / Estero / Marco Island Market Area

MONTHLY MARKET REPORT FOR OCTOBER 2018

eutrophication level indicators in Romanian seawater

Net ecosystem carbon balance in a tidal mangrove forest

Nutrient Sources, Fate, Transport, and Effects Study of Galveston Bay, Texas Rachel Windham,

The influence of coastal oceans and seas on nutrient limitation in estuaries

The State of Everglades Restoration

A nutrient loading budget for Biscayne Bay, Florida

RIVER SEDIMENTS AND COASTAL FISH PRODUCTION: WHAT ABOUT THE MEKONG?

Biscayne Bay. A Jewel in Jeopardy? Stephen Blair 1 and Sarah Bellmund 2

WATER QUALITY MONITORING PROJECT FOR DEMONSTRATION OF CANAL REMEDIATION METHODS FLORIDA KEYS

OCEANOGRAPHY. 11. The Coastal Ocean notes from the textbook, integrated with original contributions Part 2: Wetlands, and Pollution

Pleasant Bay Alliance Water Quality Monitoring Program: Statistical Analysis of Water Quality Monitoring Data

Water Quality Standards Program. FDEP Biocriteria Meeting May 16, 2017

SETTING SALINITY TARGETS FOR THE SOUTHERN COASTAL SYSTEM

Subwatershed Prioritization of the Lake Wister Watershed Using Baseflow Water Quality Monitoring Data

2004 Present, Director, Coastal Watershed Institute, FGCU , Sabbatical Leave

Spatio-Temporal Dynamics of SAV Abundance and Water Quality in the Mangrove Lakes Region of Florida Bay

List of proposed interim changes to MWRA s Effluent Outfall Ambient Monitoring Plan April 15, 2009

Georgia Coastal Water Quality

Estuaries and Catchments team, Water Wetlands and Coasts Science Branch, Science Division, Office of Environment and Heritage

Transcription:

Florida International University FIU Digital Commons SERC Research Reports Southeast Environmental Research Center 6-2- South Florida Coastal Water Quality Monitoring Network - 1-3/ Quarterly Report (C-1397) Joseph N. Boyer Southeast Environmental Research Center, Florida International University, boyerj@fiu.edu Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/sercrp Part of the Environmental Monitoring Commons, and the Water Resource Management Commons Recommended Citation Boyer, Joseph N., "South Florida Coastal Water Quality Monitoring Network - 1-3/ Quarterly Report (C-1397)" (). SERC Research Reports. 24. http://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/sercrp/24 This work is brought to you for free and open access by the Southeast Environmental Research Center at FIU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in SERC Research Reports by an authorized administrator of FIU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact dcc@fiu.edu.

Southeast Environmental Research Center OE-148 Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199 3-348-39, 3-348-496 fax, http://serc.fiu.edu Kim Hanes SFWMD 8894 Belvedere Road West Palm Beach, FL 33411 2 June Re: South Florida Coastal Water Quality Monitoring Network 1-3/ Quarterly Report (C-1397) Dear Mr. Hanes: This letter serves to transmit the South Florida Coastal Water Quality Monitoring Network Quarterly Report as per our SFWMD/SERC Cooperative Agreement #C-1397. This report consists of this letter along with corresponding tables and figures. Project Background This report includes water quality data collected monthly during the annual period of record (POR) Jan. Mar. from 28 stations in Florida Bay, 22 stations in Whitewater Bay, 2 stations in Ten Thousand Islands, 2 stations in Biscayne Bay, and 28 stations in Cape Romano-Rookery Bay-Pine Island Sound. A total of 49 stations were also collected on the SW Florida Shelf on a quarterly basis. Figure 1 shows the location of the fixed sampling stations. Water quality parameters monitored at each station include the dissolved nutrients nitrate + nitrite (NO x ), nitrite (NO 2 ), nitrate (NO 3 ), ammonium (NH 4 ), inorganic nitrogen (), and soluble reactive phosphorus (SRP). Silicate (Si(OH) 4 ) was analyzed at all stations on a quarterly basis in conjunction with SW Shelf sampling. Total concentrations of nitrogen (TN), organic nitrogen (TON), phosphorus (), and organic carbon (TOC) were also measured. All concentrations for each of these parameters are reported as parts per million () except where noted. Biological parameters monitored included chlorophyll a (µg l -1 ) and alkaline phosphatase activity (APA; µm hr -1 ). Field parameters measured at both surface and bottom of the water column include salinity, dissolved oxygen (DO; mg l -1 ), and temperature ( o C). Turbidity (NTU) of the surface water was also measured.

Data Results A previous spatial analysis of data from Florida Bay resulted in the delineation of 3 groups of stations which have robust similarities in water quality (Fig. 2). We have argued that these spatially contiguous groups of stations are the result of similar loading and processing of materials, hence we call them 'zones of similar influence'. The Eastern Bay zone (FBE) acts most like a 'conventional' estuary in that it has a quasi-longitudinal salinity gradient caused by the mixing of freshwater runoff with seawater. In contrast, the Central Bay (FBC) is a hydrographically isolated area with low and infrequent terrestrial freshwater input, a long water residence time, and high evaporative potential. The Western Bay zone (FBW) is the most influenced by the Gulf of Mexico tides and is also isolated from direct overland freshwater sources. Station #7 - Highway Creek did not cluster out with any of the Florida Bay stations and was considered separately. Using the same statistical approach as above, the TTI-WWB complex was partitioned into 6 distinct zones of similar water quality (Fig. 3). The first cluster was composed of 13 stations in and around the Shark, Harney, Broad, and Lostmans Rivers and is called the Mangrove River (MR) group. This cluster also included a sampling station just off the Faka Union Canal. The second cluster was made up of the 8 stations enclosed within Whitewater Bay proper (WWB). Twelve stations situated mostly in and around the coastal islands of TTI-WWB formed the Gulf Island group (GI). The water quality characteristics at the Coot Bay site were sufficiently different so as to be a cluster of its own. The next cluster contained the northernmost 2 stations in the Blackwater River estuary (BLK). Finally, the Inland Wilderness Waterway zone (IWW) included 11 stations distributed throughout the inside passage as well as the Chatham River and the station off Everglades City. Biscayne Bay was partitioned into 6 distinct ZSI using the above statistical analysis. The first cluster was composed of 2 stations closest to the shore in the south Bay (Fig. 4); they were called the Alongshore group (AS). These are stations most influenced by the Goulds, Military and Mowry Canals. The second cluster was made up of the stations farther from the coast called Inshore (IS). Thirteen stations situated mostly in the bay proper were called the main Bay (MAIN) group. The next cluster contained 3 stations situated in areas of great tidal exchange (ocean channel, not shown). Two stations in Card Sound grouped together SCARD. For purposes of this report, the stations added to the area north of the Rickenbacker Causeway are defined, a priori, as a distinct cluster, North Bay (NBAY). The above statistical analysis objectively classified the 49 Shelf sampling sites into 3 zones having similar water quality (Fig. ). The first cluster was composed of only 2 stations which were closest to the shore off Cape Sable; they were called the SHARK group, after the Shark River, the main source of freshwater to the region. The second cluster was made up of the 7 more northerly stations nearest the coast and called SHOAL. The remaining stations were called the SHELF group. Sampling in the Rookery Bay area began Jan. 1999, so we now have years of data available. But because of the very heterogeneous nature of the area, we will continue to use generally accepted geomorphological characteristics to group the stations (Fig. 6). These groupings are Cocohatchee River (COCO), Estero Bay (EST), Cape Romano-Marco Island (MARC), Naples Bay (NPL), Pine Island Sound (PIS), Rookery Bay (RB), and San Carlos Bay (SCB).

Data are also reported as box-and-whiskers plots (Figs. 7-28). The center horizontal line in the box is the median of the data, the top and bottom of the box are the 2 th and 7 th percentiles (quartiles), and the ends of the whiskers are the th and 9 th percentiles. Summary statistics of all water quality parameters by ecosystem are shown in Table 1. The median was chosen because it is a more accurate measure of central tendency in non-normally distributed water quality data. The range is expressed as the minimum (Min.) and maximum (Max.) values for the POR, and n is the number of data points used in the analysis. If you have any questions about the content of this report, please do not hesitate to contact me at 3-348-476 or boyerj@fiu.edu. Sincerely, Joseph N. Boyer, Ph.D. Associate Director and Scientist

Figure 1: All fixed water quality stations funded by this SFWMD project.

2.4 Florida Bay Water Quality Zones 2.2 2. 24.8-81.2-81. -8.8-8.6-8.4-8.2 Eastern Bay ( ), Central Bay, ( ), Western Bay ( ) Figure 2. Florida Bay zones.

26. 74 7 Blackwater River 7 73 72 71 69 Faka Union Canal 68 64 67 6 66 1 34 2 Gulf Islands 6Inner Waterway 6 8761 Everglades 9 City 62 63 Mangrove Rivers 3 29 31 32 33 3 34 36 37 38 39 4 41 4244 Whitewater 4 Bay 43 46 47 2. 48 49 Coot Bay -81. -81. 2. Mangrove Rivers, Whitewater Bay, Gulf Islands, Coot Bay, Blackwater River, Inner Waterway Figure 3. WWB-TTI water quality zones.

26. 133 134 132 131 Miami 129 13 128 126 127 14 13 12 19 18 2. 111 11 11 124 123 113 122 116 112 13 121-8.4-8.3-8.2-8.1 Alongshore, Inshore, Main Bay, North Bay, South Card Sound Figure 4. Biscayne Bay water quality zones.

26. 363 364 2. 362 361 36 36 366 367 38 386 384387 383 388 39 368 382 389 38 369 381 39 37 37 38 391 36 371 379 392 399 2. 3 34 33 372 373 374 378 377 376 393 394 39 398 397 396 32 37 31 24. -82. -81. -81. Figure. SW Florida Shelf water quality zones. Shark, Shoal, Shelf

26.7 26.6 26. Pine Island Sound 26.4 San Carlos Bay Estero Bay 26.3 26.2 26.1 Naples Bay 26. Rookery Bay 2.9 Marco Island 2.8-82.3-82.2-82.1-82. -81.9-81.8-81.7-81.6 Figure 6. SW estuaries.

Eastern Florida Bay Zone 1 3 4 6 1989-6 199-1 199-6 199-11 1991-4 1991-1 1992-3 1992-8 1993-1 1993-6 1993-11 1994-4 1996-1 1996-11 1997-4 1997-9 1998-2 1999-6 1-2 1-12 4-6..2.4.6.8 1. 1989-6 199-1 199-6 199-11 1991-4 1991-1 1992-3 1992-8 1993-1 1993-6 1993-11 1994-4 1996-1 1996-11 1997-4 1997-9 1998-2 1999-6 1-2 1-12 4-6.1.2.3.4 1989-6 1989-12 199-4 199-8 199-12 1991-4 1991-9 1992-1 1992-1992-9 1993-1 1993-1993-9 1994-1 1994-199-2 199-6 199-1 1996-2 1996-1 1997-2 1997-6 1997-1 1998-2 1998-6 1998-11. 1. 2. 3. 4.. 6. 7. 1989-6 199-1 199-6 199-11 1991-4 1991-1 1992-3 1992-8 1993-1 1993-6 1993-11 1994-4 1996-1 1996-11 1997-4 1997-9 1998-2 1999-6 1-2 1-12 4-6 Figure 7. Box-and-whisker plots of water quality in Eastern Florida Bay by survey.

Central Florida Bay Zone 1 3 4 6 7 1989-6 199-1 199-6 199-11 1991-4 1991-1 1992-3 1992-8 1993-1 1993-6 1993-11 1994-4 1996-1 1996-11 1997-4 1997-9 1998-2 1999-6 1-2 1-12 4-6..2.4.6.8 1. 1989-6 199-1 199-6 199-11 1991-4 1991-1 1992-3 1992-8 1993-1 1993-6 1993-11 1994-4 1996-1 1996-11 1997-4 1997-9 1998-2 1999-6 1-2 1-12 4-6.2.4.6.8.1.12 1989-6 1989-12 199-4 199-8 199-12 1991-4 1991-9 1992-1 1992-1992-9 1993-1 1993-1993-9 1994-1 1994-199-2 199-6 199-1 1996-2 1996-1 1997-2 1997-6 1997-1 1998-2 1998-6 1998-11 1 1 2 3 3 1989-6 199-1 199-6 199-11 1991-4 1991-1 1992-3 1992-8 1993-1 1993-6 1993-11 1994-4 1996-1 1996-11 1997-4 1997-9 1998-2 1999-6 1-2 1-12 4-6 Figure 8. Box-and-whisker plots of water quality in Central Florida Bay by survey.

Western Florida Bay Zone 1 3 4 6 1989-6 199-1 199-6 199-11 1991-4 1991-1 1992-3 1992-8 1993-1 1993-6 1993-11 1994-4 1996-1 1996-11 1997-4 1997-9 1998-2 1999-6 1-2 1-12 4-6..1.1..2.3.3 1989-6 199-1 199-6 199-11 1991-4 1991-1 1992-3 1992-8 1993-1 1993-6 1993-11 1994-4 1996-1 1996-11 1997-4 1997-9 1998-2 1999-6 1-2 1-12 4-6..1.1..2 1989-6 1989-12 199-4 199-8 199-12 1991-4 1991-9 1992-1 1992-1992-9 1993-1 1993-1993-9 1994-1 1994-199-2 199-6 199-1 1996-2 1996-1 1997-2 1997-6 1997-1 1998-2 1998-6 1998-11 1 1 2 1989-6 199-1 199-6 199-11 1991-4 1991-1 1992-3 1992-8 1993-1 1993-6 1993-11 1994-4 1996-1 1996-11 1997-4 1997-9 1998-2 1999-6 1-2 1-12 4-6 Figure 9. Box-and-whisker plots of water quality in Western Florida Bay by survey.

Whitewater Bay Zone 1 1 2 3 3 4 1992-9 1993-2 1993-7 1994-1994-1 1996-1 1996-11 1997-1997-1 1998-3 1998-8 1999-2 1999-12 -1 1-1 3-6 4-4 -2..1.2.3.4. 1992-9 1993-2 1993-7 1994-1994-1 1996-1 1996-11 1997-1997-1 1998-3 1998-8 1999-2 1999-12 -1 1-1 3-6 4-4 -2.2.4.6.8.1 1992-9 1993-1 1993-1993-9 1994-1 1994-199-1 199-199-9 1996-1 1996-1996-9 1997-2 1997-6 1997-1 1998-2 1998-6 1998-11 2-9 3-9 1 1 2 3 1992-9 1993-2 1993-7 1994-1994-1 1996-1 1996-11 1997-1997-1 1998-3 1998-8 1999-2 1999-12 -1 1-1 3-6 4-4 -2 Figure 1. Box-and-whisker plots of water quality in WWB-TTI by survey.

Mangrove Rivers Zone 1 1 2 3 3 4 4 1992-9 1993-2 1993-7 1994-1994-1 1996-1 1996-11 1997-4 1997-9 1998-2 1999-6 1-2 1-12 4-6..1.2.3.4. 1992-9 1993-2 1993-7 1994-1994-1 1996-1 1996-11 1997-4 1997-9 1998-2 1999-6 1-2 1-12 4-6.2.4.6.8.1.12 1992-9 1993-1 1993-1993-9 1994-1 1994-199-1 199-199-9 1996-1 1996-1996-9 1997-1 1997-1997-9 1998-1 1998-1999-2 1999-6 1999-1 -2-6 -1 1-2 1-6 1-1 2-2 2-6 3-2 3-6 3-1 4-2 4-6 4-1 -2 1 1 1992-9 1993-2 1993-7 1994-1994-1 1996-1 1996-11 1997-4 1997-9 1998-2 1999-6 1-2 1-12 4-6 Figure 11. Box-and-whisker plots of water quality in WWB-TTI by survey.

Gulf Islands Zone 1 1 2 3 3 4 4 1992-9 1993-2 1993-7 1994-1994-1 1996-1 1996-11 1997-4 1997-9 1998-2 1999-6 1-2 1-12 4-6..1.1..2 1992-9 1993-2 1993-7 1994-1994-1 1996-1 1996-11 1997-4 1997-9 1998-2 1999-6 1-2 1-12 4-6..1.1. 1992-9 1993-1 1993-1993-9 1994-1 1994-199-1 199-199-9 1996-1 1996-1996-9 1997-1 1997-1997-9 1998-1 1998-1999-2 1999-6 1999-1 -2-6 -1 1-2 1-6 1-1 2-2 2-6 3-2 3-6 3-1 4-2 4-6 4-1 -2 1 1 1992-9 1993-2 1993-7 1994-1994-1 1996-1 1996-11 1997-4 1997-9 1998-2 1999-6 1-2 1-12 4-6 Figure 12. Box-and-whisker plots of water quality in WWB-TTI by survey.

Inner Waterway Zone 1 1 2 3 3 4 4 199-2 199-7 1996-1 1996-8 1997-1 1997-6 1997-11 1998-4 1999-8 -6 1-4 2-2 2-12 3-1 4-8..1.1..2.3 199-2 199-7 1996-1 1996-8 1997-1 1997-6 1997-11 1998-4 1999-8 -6 1-4 2-2 2-12 3-1 4-8..1.1. 199-2 199-7 1996-1 1996-8 1997-1 1997-6 1997-11 1998-4 1999-8 -6 1-4 2-2 2-12 3-1 4-8 1 1 2 199-2 199-7 1996-1 1996-8 1997-1 1997-6 1997-11 1998-4 1999-8 -6 1-4 2-2 2-12 3-1 4-8 Figure 13. Box-and-whisker plots of water quality in WWB-TTI by survey.

Blackwater River Zone 1 1 2 3 3 4 199-2 199-7 1996-2 1996-9 1997-2 1997-7 1998-1998-11 1999-4 -2-12 1-1 3-6 4-4 -2..1.1..2.3 199-2 199-7 1996-2 1996-9 1997-2 1997-7 1998-1998-11 1999-4 -2-12 1-1 3-6 4-4 -2..1.1..2 199-2 199-7 1996-2 1996-9 1997-2 1997-7 1998-1998-11 1999-4 -2-12 1-1 3-6 4-4 -2 1 1 199-2 199-7 1996-2 1996-9 1997-2 1997-7 1998-1998-11 1999-4 -2-12 1-1 3-6 4-4 -2 Figure 14. Box-and-whisker plots of water quality in WWB-TTI by survey.

Alongshore Zone 1 1 2 3 3 4 4 1993-9 1994-3 1994-6 1994-12 199-6 199-9 199-12 1996-3 1996-9 1996-12 1997-3 1997-6 1997-9 1998-3 1998-6 1999-4 1999-1 -1 1-8 2-2 3-2 4-2 4-8 -2..2.4.6.8 1. 1.2 1.4 1993-9 1994-3 1994-6 1994-12 199-6 199-9 199-12 1996-3 1996-9 1996-12 1997-3 1997-6 1997-9 1998-3 1998-6 1999-4 1999-1 -1 1-8 2-2 3-2 4-2 4-8 -2.1.2.3.4 1993-9 1994-3 1994-6 1994-12 199-6 199-9 199-12 1996-3 1996-9 1996-12 1997-3 1997-6 1997-9 1998-3 1998-6 1999-4 1999-1 -1 1-8 2-2 3-2 4-2 4-8 -2.. 1. 1. 2. 2. 3. 1993-9 1994-3 1994-6 1994-12 199-6 199-9 199-12 1996-3 1996-9 1996-12 1997-3 1997-6 1997-9 1998-3 1998-6 1999-4 1999-1 -1 1-8 2-2 3-2 4-2 4-8 -2 Figure 1. Box-and-whisker plots of water quality in Biscayne Bay by survey.

Inshore Zone 1 1 2 3 3 4 4 1993-9 1994-3 1994-6 1994-12 199-6 199-9 199-12 1996-3 1996-9 1996-12 1997-3 1997-6 1997-9 1998-3 1998-6 1999-4 1999-1 -1 1-8 2-2 3-2 4-2 4-8 -2..1.2.3.4..6.7.8.9 1993-9 1994-3 1994-6 1994-12 199-6 199-9 199-12 1996-3 1996-9 1996-12 1997-3 1997-6 1997-9 1998-3 1998-6 1999-4 1999-1 -1 1-8 2-2 3-2 4-2 4-8 -2.1.2.3.4 1993-9 1994-3 1994-6 1994-12 199-6 199-9 199-12 1996-3 1996-9 1996-12 1997-3 1997-6 1997-9 1998-3 1998-6 1999-4 1999-1 -1 1-8 2-2 3-2 4-2 4-8 -2. 1. 2. 3. 4.. 6. 7. 1993-9 1994-3 1994-6 1994-12 199-6 199-9 199-12 1996-3 1996-9 1996-12 1997-3 1997-6 1997-9 1998-3 1998-6 1999-4 1999-1 -1 1-8 2-2 3-2 4-2 4-8 -2 Figure 16. Box-and-whisker plots of water quality in Biscayne Bay by survey.

Main Bay Zone 1 1 2 3 3 4 4 1993-9 1994-3 1994-6 1994-12 199-6 199-9 199-12 1996-3 1996-9 1996-12 1997-3 1997-6 1997-9 1998-3 1998-6 1999-4 1999-1 -1 1-8 2-2 3-2 4-2 4-8 -2..1.2.3.4. 1993-9 1994-3 1994-6 1994-12 199-6 199-9 199-12 1996-3 1996-9 1996-12 1997-3 1997-6 1997-9 1998-3 1998-6 1999-4 1999-1 -1 1-8 2-2 3-2 4-2 4-8 -2.1.2.3.4. 1993-9 1994-3 1994-6 1994-12 199-6 199-9 199-12 1996-3 1996-9 1996-12 1997-3 1997-6 1997-9 1998-3 1998-6 1999-4 1999-1 -1 1-8 2-2 3-2 4-2 4-8 -2.. 1. 1. 2. 2. 3. 3. 4. 4. 1993-9 1994-3 1994-6 1994-12 199-6 199-9 199-12 1996-3 1996-9 1996-12 1997-3 1997-6 1997-9 1998-3 1998-6 1999-4 1999-1 -1 1-8 2-2 3-2 4-2 4-8 -2 Figure 17. Box-and-whisker plots of water quality in Biscayne Bay by survey.

South Card Sound Zone 1 1 2 3 3 4 4 1993-1 1994-1 1994-4 1994-7 1994-1 199-1 199-4 199-7 199-1 1996-1 1996-4 1996-7 1996-1 1997-1 1997-4 1997-7 1997-1 1998-1 1998-4 1998-11 1999-2 1999-8 -2-8 1-6 1-12 2-6 2-9 2-12 3-6 3-9 3-12 4-6 4-12..1.1..2 1993-1 1994-1 1994-4 1994-7 1994-1 199-1 199-4 199-7 199-1 1996-1 1996-4 1996-7 1996-1 1997-1 1997-4 1997-7 1997-1 1998-1 1998-4 1998-11 1999-2 1999-8 -2-8 1-6 1-12 2-6 2-9 2-12 3-6 3-9 3-12 4-6 4-12.1.2.3 1993-1 1994-1 1994-4 1994-7 1994-1 199-1 199-4 199-7 199-1 1996-1 1996-4 1996-7 1996-1 1997-1 1997-4 1997-7 1997-1 1998-1 1998-4 1998-11 1999-2 1999-8 -2-8 1-6 1-12 2-6 2-9 2-12 3-6 3-9 3-12 4-6 4-12.. 1. 1. 2. 2. 3. 3. 1993-1 1994-1 1994-4 1994-7 1994-1 199-1 199-4 199-7 199-1 1996-1 1996-4 1996-7 1996-1 1997-1 1997-4 1997-7 1997-1 1998-1 1998-4 1998-11 1999-2 1999-8 -2-8 1-6 1-12 2-6 2-9 2-12 3-6 3-9 3-12 4-6 4-12 Figure 18. Box-and-whisker plots of water quality in Biscayne Bay by survey.

North Bay Zone 1 1 2 3 3 4 1996-8 1996-1 1996-12 1997-2 1997-4 1997-6 1997-8 1997-1 1998-2 1998-4 1998-6 1998-8 1998-11 1-4 1-6 1-8 1-1 1-12 2-2 2-4 2-6 2-12 3-2 3-4 3-6 3-1 3-12 4-2 4-4 4-6 4-8 4-1 4-12 -2..1.1..2.3.3 1996-8 1996-1 1996-12 1997-2 1997-4 1997-6 1997-8 1997-1 1998-2 1998-4 1998-6 1998-8 1998-11 1-4 1-6 1-8 1-1 1-12 2-2 2-4 2-6 2-12 3-2 3-4 3-6 3-1 3-12 4-2 4-4 4-6 4-8 4-1 4-12 -2.1.2.3.4 1996-8 1996-1 1996-12 1997-2 1997-4 1997-6 1997-8 1997-1 1998-2 1998-4 1998-6 1998-8 1998-11 1-4 1-6 1-8 1-1 1-12 2-2 2-4 2-6 2-12 3-2 3-4 3-6 3-1 3-12 4-2 4-4 4-6 4-8 4-1 4-12 -2. 2. 4. 6. 8. 1. 1996-8 1996-1 1996-12 1997-2 1997-4 1997-6 1997-8 1997-1 1998-2 1998-4 1998-6 1998-8 1998-11 1-4 1-6 1-8 1-1 1-12 2-2 2-4 2-6 2-12 3-2 3-4 3-6 3-1 3-12 4-2 4-4 4-6 4-8 4-1 4-12 -2 Figure 19. Box-and-whisker plots of water quality in Biscayne Bay by survey.

Shelf Zone 1 1 2 3 3 4 199-199-12 1996-3 1996-7 1996-1 1997-2 1997-1997-7 1997-1 1998-1 1998-4 -1 2-4 3-4 3-1 4-4 4-1.1.2.3.4..6.7.8.9 199-199-12 1996-3 1996-7 1996-1 1997-2 1997-1997-7 1997-1 1998-1 1998-4 -1 2-4 3-4 3-1 4-4 4-1.1.2.3.4 199-199-12 1996-3 1996-7 1996-1 1997-2 1997-1997-7 1997-1 1998-1 1998-4 -1 2-4 3-4 3-1 4-4 4-1. 2. 4. 6. 8. 1. 199-199-12 1996-3 1996-7 1996-1 1997-2 1997-1997-7 1997-1 1998-1 1998-4 -1 2-4 3-4 3-1 4-4 4-1 Figure. Box-and-whisker plots of water quality in SW Florida Shelf by survey.

Shark Zone 1 1 2 3 3 4 4 199-199-12 1996-3 1996-7 1996-1 1997-2 1997-1997-7 1997-1 1998-1 1998-4 -1 2-4 3-4 3-1 4-4 4-1.2.4.6.8.1.12 199-199-12 1996-3 1996-7 1996-1 1997-2 1997-1997-7 1997-1 1998-1 1998-4 -1 2-4 3-4 3-1 4-4 4-1.2.4.6.8 199-199-12 1996-3 1996-7 1996-1 1997-2 1997-1997-7 1997-1 1998-1 1998-4 -1 2-4 3-4 3-1 4-4 4-1. 2. 4. 6. 8. 1. 199-199-12 1996-3 1996-7 1996-1 1997-2 1997-1997-7 1997-1 1998-1 1998-4 -1 2-4 3-4 3-1 4-4 4-1 Figure 21. Box-and-whisker plots of water quality in SW Florida Shelf by survey.

Shoal Zone 1 1 2 3 3 4 199-199-12 1996-3 1996-7 1996-1 1997-2 1997-1997-7 1997-1 1998-1 1998-4 -1 2-4 3-4 3-1 4-4 4-1.1.2.3.4..6 199-199-12 1996-3 1996-7 1996-1 1997-2 1997-1997-7 1997-1 1998-1 1998-4 -1 2-4 3-4 3-1 4-4 4-1.1.2.3.4 199-199-12 1996-3 1996-7 1996-1 1997-2 1997-1997-7 1997-1 1998-1 1998-4 -1 2-4 3-4 3-1 4-4 4-1. 1. 2. 3. 4.. 6. 7. 199-199-12 1996-3 1996-7 1996-1 1997-2 1997-1997-7 1997-1 1998-1 1998-4 -1 2-4 3-4 3-1 4-4 4-1 Figure 22. Box-and-whisker plots of water quality in SW Florida Shelf by survey.

Marco Zone 1 1 2 3 3 4 4 2-9 3-9..1.1..2 2-9 3-9.2.4.6.8.1.12.14 2-9 3-9.. 1. 1.. 2-9 3-9 Figure 23. Box-and-whisker plots of water quality in RB-PIS by survey.

Rookery Bay Zone 1 1 2 3 3 4 2-9 3-9..1.1..2.3 2-9 3-9.2.4.6.8.1 2-9 3-9.. 1. 1.. 2. 3. 2-9 3-9 Figure 24. Box-and-whisker plots of water quality in RB-PIS by survey.

Naples Zone 1 1 2 3 3 4 2-9 3-9..1.1..2 2-9 3-9.2.4.6.8.1.12 2-9 3-9.. 1. 1.. 2-9 3-9 Figure 2. Box-and-whisker plots of water quality in RB-PIS by survey.

San Carlos Bay Zone 1 1 2 3 3 4 2-9 3-9..1.2.3.4..6 2-9 3-9..1.1. 2-9 3-9.. 1. 1.. 2. 3. 2-9 3-9 Figure 26. Box-and-whisker plots of water quality in RB-PIS by survey.

Estero Bay Zone 1 1 2 3 3 4 2-9 3-9..1.1. 2-9 3-9..1.1. 2-9 3-9.. 1. 1.. 2-9 3-9 Figure 27. Box-and-whisker plots of water quality in RB-PIS by survey.

Pine Island Sound Zone 1 1 2 3 3 4 2-9 3-9..1.1. 2-9 3-9..1.1. 2-9 3-9.. 1. 1.. 2. 2-9 3-9 Figure 28. Box-and-whisker plots of water quality in RB-PIS by survey.

Table 1. Parameter Zone Median Min. Max. n Alkaline Biscayne Bay.11.33.698 7 Phosphatase Florida Bay.188.23 1.289 84 Activity Rookery Bay.42.18.66 87 (µm h -1 ) SW Shelf.4.23.192 49 Ten Thousand Is..43.27.44 78 Whitewater Bay.4.18 3.731 66 Chlorophyll a Biscayne Bay.24.9 1.874 7 (µg l -1 ) Florida Bay.336.86 2.8 84 Rookery Bay 1.983.819 7.329 87 SW Shelf.766.192 4.91 49 Ten Thousand Is. 2.14.646 1.276 78 Whitewater Bay 2.966.646 14.13 66 Surface Biscayne Bay 6.7 6.12 8.31 7 Dissolved Florida Bay 6.98.2 8.77 84 Oxygen Rookery Bay 7.2 4.98 8.83 87 (mg l -1 ) SW Shelf 7.19.76 8.31 49 Ten Thousand Is. 7.4.21 8.9 78 Whitewater Bay 7.4 4.31 11.24 66 Bottom Biscayne Bay 6.8 6.14 8.39 7 Dissolved Florida Bay 7.11.43 8.76 84 Oxygen Rookery Bay 6.96.13 8.87 87 (mg l -1 ) SW Shelf 7.2 6.31 8.21 49 Ten Thousand Is. 7.9.16 9.32 78 Whitewater Bay 7.36 4.46 1.6 66 Biscayne Bay 6 1.16 7 () Florida Bay.18 2.168 84 Rookery Bay 9 1.2 87 SW Shelf 3 1.11 49 Ten Thousand Is..1 1.13 78 Whitewater Bay.28 4.142 66 NH 4 +

Parameter Zone Median Min. Max. n Biscayne Bay 1 4 7 () Florida Bay 2.41 84 Rookery Bay 2 6 87 SW Shelf 1 7 49 Ten Thousand Is. 2.14 78 Whitewater Bay.26 66 NO 2 - Biscayne Bay 2.39 7 () Florida Bay 2.82 84 Rookery Bay 2.1 87 SW Shelf 1 49 Ten Thousand Is..116 78 Whitewater Bay.26 2.12 66 NO 3 - ph Biscayne Bay 8.7 7.94 8.43 7 Florida Bay 8.23 7.88 8.71 84 Rookery Bay 7.98 6.9 8.24 87 SW Shelf 8.1 7.89 8.7 49 Ten Thousand Is. 7.86 7.46 8.14 78 Whitewater Bay 7.867 7.31 8.7 66 Surface Biscayne Bay 3.92 32.19 37.93 7 Florida Bay 36.39 26.67 43.91 84 Rookery Bay 34.4 21. 3.71 87 SW Shelf 3.21 32.12 36.3 49 Ten Thousand Is. 34.19. 36.32 78 Whitewater Bay 16.36 2.74 37.7 66 Bottom Biscayne Bay 3.99 32.21 38.44 7 Florida Bay 36.38 26.87 43.9 84 Rookery Bay 34.69 2.34 3.78 87 SW Shelf 3.23 32.1 36.8 49 Ten Thousand Is. 34.39 4.98 36.33 78 Whitewater Bay 16.68 3.17 33.74 66 Si(OH) 4 Biscayne Bay.11.211 2 () Florida Bay.194.12 1.87 28 Rookery Bay.8.16 1.264 29 SW Shelf.36 1.377 49 Ten Thousand Is. 1.146.19 2.6 26 Whitewater Bay 2.372.77 4.1 22

Parameter Zone Median Min. Max. n Soluble Biscayne Bay 1 2 7 Reactive Florida Bay 1 2 84 Phosphorus Rookery Bay 8 1.37 87 () SW Shelf 1 1 3 49 Ten Thousand Is. 1.21 78 Whitewater Bay 2 1 8 66 Surface Biscayne Bay 22.69 1.89 28.19 7 Temperature Florida Bay 22.3 13.67 26.7 84 ( o C) Rookery Bay 19.78 17.33 23.46 87 SW Shelf 19.81 18.8 21.24 49 Ten Thousand Is. 19. 13.74 27.39 78 Whitewater Bay.68 1.9 24.1 66 Bottom Biscayne Bay 22.67 1.83 28. 7 Temperature Florida Bay 22.34 13.71 26.9 84 ( o C) Rookery Bay 19.47 17. 23.2 87 SW Shelf 19.63 18.81 21.23 49 Ten Thousand Is. 19.9 14.8 27.8 78 Whitewater Bay.7 14.96 23.93 66 Total Biscayne Bay.189.82.47 7 Nitrogen Florida Bay.31.14.71 82 () Rookery Bay.23.14.434 87 SW Shelf.213.128.294 49 Ten Thousand Is..244.143.11 78 Whitewater Bay.398.229.99 66 Total Biscayne Bay 2.227 1.128 4.92 7 Organic Florida Bay 6.48 1.831 21.33 83 Carbon Rookery Bay 3.4 1.443 8.46 87 () SW Shelf 2.14 1.67 4.49 49 Ten Thousand Is..32 2.433 17.6 78 Whitewater Bay 13.779 4.1 24.88 66 Total Biscayne Bay.171.73.42 7 Organic Florida Bay.26.97.2 82 Nitrogen Rookery Bay.214.18.43 87 () SW Shelf.4.127.284 49 Ten Thousand Is..212.116.37 78 Whitewater Bay.3.174.8 66

Parameter Zone Median Min. Max. n Total Biscayne Bay 4 2.24 7 Phosphorus Florida Bay 3.34 84 () Rookery Bay.34..8 87 SW Shelf.1 6. 49 Ten Thousand Is..28.14.89 78 Whitewater Bay.27.12.62 66 Turbidity Biscayne Bay.64.12 2.84 7 (NTU) Florida Bay 2.17.34 16.6 84 Rookery Bay 2.76.33 16.82 87 SW Shelf 1.9.7 11. 49 Ten Thousand Is. 4.61 1.18 19.22 78 Whitewater Bay.21 1.7 37.4 66