Traffic Noise Technical Report. LP 336 Widening (From IH45 to FM 1314) Montgomery County

Similar documents
1. Introduction Noise Analysis Results Figures. List of Tables

Examples of Recommended Text for Documenting Traffic Noise Analyses

Noise Impact Analysis Technical Report

MnDOT GREATER MN STAND ALONE NOISE BARRIER PROGRAM

TH 100 Interchange & Auxiliary Lane from 36 th Street to Cedar Lake Road

ENV125. Basics of Noise and Policy. Date. Date. Footer Text

PennDOTDistrict 8 I-83 East Shore Section 1 Improvements Project. Final Design Noise Analysis & Mitigation Recommendations

Why does MnDOT build noise barriers? What is a Type I project?

FORT WORTH. Photo by Liam Frederick. November 17, 2015

Traffic Noise Technical Report

Why does MnDOT build noise barriers? What is a Type I project? What is an impacted location?

Dulles Toll Road Highway Traffic Noise Policy. February 2, 2011

content chapter Highway Noise Policy and Regulations 15.1 Purpose 15.2 Definitions 15.3 Applicability

dministrator Wyoming Department of Transportation Federal ighway Administration Wyoming Division

T.H. 100 Reconstruction in St. Louis Park Environmental Assessment. Appendix C Traffic Noise Analysis Report

3. Existing Conditions and 3.6 Environmental Noise Consequences

APPENDIX F. Noise Impact Analysis

Draft Dulles Toll Road Highway Noise Policy

NOISE REPORT ADDENDUM July 2003

APPENDIX C NOISE STUDY TECHNICAL REPORT

APPENDIX E EAW ITEM 17 NOISE

HIGHWAY NOISE STUDY ANALYSIS

How Does NHDOT Address Highway Traffic Noise?

Appendix E I-73 North Noise Report

Bow-Concord I-93 Noise Study. Noise Study Informational Meeting

Draft Preliminary Design -- Traffic Noise Report

Island Park U.S. 20. Targhee Pass Environmental Assessment. Traffic Noise Analysis Report

Virginia Department of Transportation Coalfields Expressway Section II

A comparison of the Northwest Corridor (NWC) Project Noise Analysis Completed under the 2005 GDOT Noise Policy versus the 2011 FHWA Noise Policy

APPENDIX D NOISE QUALITY ANALYSIS, PROCEDURES AND RESULTS

Traffic Noise Report. Glenn Highway: MP 53 to 56 Reconstruction Moose Creek Canyon Project DOT&PF Project No: 58013

Appendix D. EAW Item 17: Noise. Traffic Noise Analysis Report

Appendix D Highway Traffic Noise Assessment

Standard emission minimization measures for construction activities will be implemented, as indicated above.

APPENDIX C NOISE STUDY TECHNICAL REPORT

NOISE GOALS / POLICIES / MEASURES

NOISE GOALS / POLICIES / MEASURES

Arkansas Department of Transportation. Policy on Highway Traffic Noise Abatement

COMPONENTS OF THE NOISE ELEMENT

US 6/19 th Street Interchange Lookout Lid Golden, CO

PRELIMINARY NOISE ANALYSIS

12-1 INTRODUCTION 12-2 REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS

Noise Study Report December 2016

NOISE BARRIER ANALYSIS

Virginia Department Of Transportation. Highway Traffic Noise Impact Analysis Guidance Manual

TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACT AND ABATEMENT ANALYSIS TECHNICAL REPORT FOR THE 6TH AVENUE PARKWAY EXTENSION ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT

Chapter 21. Noise BACKGROUND

Draft Noise Study Report

MnDOT Noise Policy. Type I Federal-aid Projects

Chapter 7 Noise. 1 How is noise perceived by the human ear?

NOISE STUDY REPORT DESIGN ADDENDUM

This federal regulation resulted from the Noise Control Act of 1972 and the Federal Aid Highway Act of These regulations state the following:

The locations of the Common Noise Environments and noise modeling sites are shown in Figure 1.

PRELIMINARY NOISE IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT

Final Noise Technical Report

Noise Analysis Technical Report Environmental Reevaluation of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement Bi-County Parkway Location Study

INDOT's New Traffic Noise Policy

FEDERAL BOULEVARD (5 TH AVENUE TO HOWARD PLACE) PLANNING ENVIRONMENTAL LINKAGE STUDY TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACT ANALYSIS

Traffic Noise Technical Report. November 2008

FIGURE N-1 LAND USE COMPATIBILITY FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT NEAR TRANSPORTATION NOISE SOURCES

The definitions for noise and ground-borne vibration are discussed in this section to provide context for the evaluation of noise.

NOISE STUDY REPORT. Interstate 75 / State Road 951 Ultimate Interchange Improvements PD&E Study. Collier County. June 20, 2013

Noise October 22, Noise Existing Conditions. Noise Characteristics

US 53 Noise Mitigation

Steve Coffinbargar, Kane County Division of Transportation Dr. Ken Runkle, Illinois Department of Transportation

Preliminary Noise Impact Analysis Report

Noise Study Report GOLDEN STATE CORRIDOR DEVELOPMENT

Traffic Noise Analysis

17 NOISE. A. Noise and Vibration Concepts

Attachment E2 Noise Technical Memorandum SR 520

Abbott Road Rehabilitation Project. Noise Study Report

SECTION B TABLES & FIGURES

CREATE. Noise and Vibration Assessment Methodology

NOISE TECHNICAL REPORT UPDATE FOR THE VROOMAN ROAD BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT

Noise Analysis Study along I Tim Bjorneberg Project Development Program Manager SDDOT

3.6 NOISE Affected Environment. Noise Level Terminology and Human Hearing

Noise. Our Quality of Life. Introduction

This section discusses and analyzes the ambient noise characteristics of the proposed Cluster I Solar Power Project.

STATE OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TRAFFIC AND CONSTRUCTION NOISE ANALYSIS AND ABATEMENT POLICY

Peak noise levels during any time period can be characterized with statistical terms.

TRAFFIC NOISE REPORT

NOISE IMPACT ESTIMATES per FTA and APTA CRITERIA

Harlem Avenue Interchange Design Discussion. August 24, 2015

Alternatives Evaluation Methodology

Protecting sensitive land uses, such as schools, hospitals, and libraries from sound levels in excess of residential sound levels.

Traffic Noise Introduction to Traffic Noise Analysis and Abatement

Noise Technical Report for the Fore River Bridge Replacement Study

Dormitory Authority of the State of New York Page 14-1 Staten Island Supreme Courthouse Project Draft EIS

PUBLIC HEARING LOOP 9

HIGHWAY TRAFFIC NOISE IN THE UNITED STATES

Hennepin County Public Works

7.0 NOISE ELEMENT 7.1 INTRODUCTION

Waukesha Bypass Noise Study

Traffic Noise Presentation

TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 12 Noise

Clearlake Road (SR 501) PD&E Study: Noise Study Report (NSR)

Town of Portola Valley General Plan. Noise Element

APPENDIX L IMPLEMENTATION MATRIX

Traffic Noise Analysis SouthEast Connector

Transcription:

Traffic Noise Technical Report LP 336 Widening (From IH45 to FM 1314) Montgomery County Prepared by: Houston District Date: April 2017 CSJ: 0338-11-056 The environmental review, consultation, and other actions required by applicable Federal environmental laws for this project are being, or have been, carried-out by TxDOT pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 327 and a Memorandum of Understanding dated December 16, 2014, and executed by FHWA and TxDOT.

Table of Contents 1. Introduction... 2 2. Noise Analysis Results... 4 FIGURE 1: NOISE RECEPTORS MAP Figures List of Tables Table 1: FHWA Noise Abatement Criteria (NAC)... 3 Table 2: Traffic Noise Levels db(a) Leq... 4 Table 3: Noise Impact Contours... 5 CSJ: 0338-11-056 i

1. Introduction This analysis was accomplished in accordance with TxDOT s (FHWA approved) Guidelines for Analysis and Abatement of Roadway Traffic Noise (2011). Sound from highway traffic is generated primarily from a vehicle s tires, engine and exhaust. It is commonly measured in decibels and is expressed as "db." Sound occurs over a wide range of frequencies. However, not all frequencies are detectable by the human ear; therefore, an adjustment is made to the high and low frequencies to approximate the way an average person hears traffic sounds. This adjustment is called A-weighting and is expressed as "db(a)." Also, because traffic sound levels are never constant due to the changing number, type and speed of vehicles, a single value is used to represent the average or equivalent sound level and is expressed as "Leq." The traffic noise analysis typically includes the following elements: Identification of land use activity areas that might be impacted by traffic noise. Determination of existing noise levels. Prediction of future noise levels. Identification of possible noise impacts. Consideration and evaluation of measures to reduce noise impacts. CSJ: 0338-11-056 2

The FHWA has established the following Noise Abatement Criteria (NAC) for various land use activity areas that are used as one of two means to determine when a traffic noise impact would occur (Table 1). Table 1: FHWA Noise Abatement Criteria (NAC) Activity Category A B C D E db(a) Leq 57 (exterior) 67 (exterior) 67 (exterior) 52 (interior) 72 (exterior) Description of Land Use Activity Areas Lands on which serenity and quiet are of extra-ordinary significance and serve an important public need and where the preservation of those qualities is essential if the area is to continue to serve its intended purpose. Residential Active sport areas, amphitheaters, auditoriums, campgrounds, cemeteries, day care centers, hospitals, libraries, medical facilities, parks, picnic areas, places of worship, playgrounds, public meeting rooms, public or nonprofit institutional structures, radio studios, recording studios, recreation areas, Section 4(f) sites, schools, television studios, trails, and trail crossings Auditoriums, day care centers, hospitals, libraries, medical facilities, places of worship, public meeting rooms, public or non-profit institutional structures, radio studios, recording studios, schools, and television studios Hotels, motels, offices, restaurants/bars, and other developed lands, properties, or activities not included in A-D or F. F -- Agricultural, airports, bus yards, emergency services, industrial, logging, maintenance facilities, manufacturing, mining, rail yards, retail facilities, shipyards, utilities (water resources, water treatment, electrical), and warehousing. G -- Undeveloped lands that are not permitted. A noise impact occurs when either the absolute or relative criterion is met: Absolute criterion: the predicted noise level at a receiver approaches, equals or exceeds the NAC. "Approach" is defined as one db(a) below the NAC. For example: a noise impact would occur at a Category B residence if the noise level is predicted to be 66 db(a) or above. CSJ: 0338-11-056 3

Relative criterion: the predicted noise level substantially exceeds the existing noise level at a receiver even though the predicted noise level does not approach, equal or exceed the NAC. Substantially exceeds is defined as more than 10 db(a). For example: a noise impact would occur at a Category B residence if the existing level is 54 db(a) and the predicted level is 65 db(a). When a traffic noise impact occurs, noise abatement measures must be considered. A noise abatement measure is any positive action taken to reduce the impact of traffic noise on an activity area. The FHWA traffic noise modeling software was used to calculate existing and predicted traffic noise levels. The model primarily considers the number, type and speed of vehicles; highway alignment and grade; cuts, fills and natural berms; surrounding terrain features; and the locations of activity areas likely to be impacted by the associated traffic noise. 2. Noise Analysis Results Existing and predicted traffic noise levels were modeled at receiver locations (Table 2 and Figure 1) that represent the land use activity areas adjacent to the proposed project that might be impacted by traffic noise and potentially benefit from feasible and reasonable noise abatement. Table 2: Traffic Noise Levels db(a) Leq Representative Receiver NAC Category NAC Level Existing Predicted (2041) Change (+/-) R1 Residential B 67 54 57 +3 No R2 Residential B 67 50 53 +3 No R3 Residential B 67 50 52 +2 No R4 Residential B 67 50 52 +2 No R5 Residential B 67 48 51 +3 No R6 Softball Field C 67 51 56 +5 No Noise Impact As indicated in Table 2, the proposed project would not result in a traffic noise impact. To avoid noise impacts that may result from future development of properties adjacent to the project, local officials responsible for land use control programs must ensure, to the maximum extent possible, no new activities are planned or constructed along or within the following predicted (2041) noise impact contours. CSJ: 0338-11-056 4

Table 3: Noise Impact Contours Land Use Impact Contour Distance From Right of Way NAC Category B&C 66 db(a) 25 feet NAC Category E 71 db(a) At ROW Noise associated with the construction of the project is difficult to predict. Heavy machinery, the major source of noise in construction, is constantly moving in unpredictable patterns. However, construction normally occurs during daylight hours when occasional loud noises are more tolerable. None of the receivers are expected to be exposed to construction noise for a long duration; therefore, any extended disruption of normal activities is not expected. Provisions will be included in the plans and specifications that require the contractor to make every reasonable effort to minimize construction noise through abatement measures such as work-hour controls and proper maintenance of muffler systems. A copy of this traffic noise analysis will be available to local officials. On the date of approval of this document (Date of Public Knowledge), FHWA and TxDOT are no longer responsible for providing noise abatement for new development adjacent to the project. CSJ: 0338-11-056 5

Figures FIGURE 1: NOISE RECEPTOR MAP

END PROJECT ED R6 KH A 1314 S. FRAZIER ST T DR RBA CO TX -3 36 NR OE R3 R4 E RT R5 R R2 PO R1 RD BEGIN PROJECT Legend Non-Impacted Receptors 66 db(a) Contour 71dB(A) Contour 0 600 1,200 Feet FIGURE 1 LOOP 336 SOUTH (IH 45 TO FM 1314) NOISE RECEPTOR MAP MONTGOMERY COUNTY, TEXAS DATE: APRIL 2017